identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03BBA15F1475FFF31CC1847BFE12FF7C.text	03BBA15F1475FFF31CC1847BFE12FF7C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cleantioides pandemus Negromonte & Lucatelli & Paiva & Souza-Filho 2022	<div><p>Cleantioides pandemus sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figures 5–8)</p> <p>Type material</p> <p>Holotype. Male (2.7 mm), <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-35.09&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-8.77" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -35.09/lat -8.77)">Tamandaré Bay</a>, Pernambuco (8.77°S, 35.09°W), #2 light trap, 25 September 2014, MOUFPE 20060.</p> <p>Paratypes. 1 male, same as holotype, #2 light trap, 3 October 2013, MOUFPE 20061. 1 male, same as holotype, #1 light trap, 21 July 2012, MOUFPE 20062. 1 male, same as holotype, #2 light trap, 25 September 2014, MOUFPE 20063.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Body 5.6x longer than wide, lacking plumose setae. Antenna 2 article 2 with a ventromesial process with bilobed apex and much longer than dorsalmesial process. Pereopod 4 propodus with a robust seta tridentate distally; dactylus without unguis and with rounded tip. Pleotelson dorsally almost straight, 0.3x total body length, 1.9x longer than wide; dorsum of distal half with oblique circular plane inclined ~20° from horizontal, occupying 0.44 of pleotelson length, well defined by a sharp marginal ridge extending all around, with 2 submedian poorly developed rounded-edged lobes dorsally separated by a very faint furrow, followed by 2 submedian longitudinal rounded ridges (best seen in lateral view). Ridges not reaching posterior margin.</p> <p>Description. Based on holotype.</p> <p>Body 5.6x longer than wide, dorsal densely rugose. Head 1.5x wider than long, with anteromesial excavated depression; posterior margin convex. Eyes dorsolateral, reniform. Coxae 5–7 and epimeral plates 1–4 without plumose setae on posterior margin. Pleotelson 0.3x total body length, 1.9x longer than wide, lacking setae. Pleonite 1 free and articulated, barely visible under pereonite 7. Pleonites 2–3 well defined but not articulated, pleonite 4 fused medially only, lateral margin hidden under pleonite 2; remaining pleotelson parallel-sided and with semicircular apex; dorsum of distal half with oblique circular plane inclined ~20° from horizontal, occupying 0.44x of pleotelson length, well defined by a sharp marginal ridge extending all around, dorsally with 2 submedian poorly developed rounded-edged lobes separated by a very faint furrow, followed by 2 submedian longitudinal rounded ridges (best seen in lateral view); ridges not reaching posterior margin.</p> <p>Antenna 1 reaching ~1/3 of article 3 of antenna 2 peduncle; peduncle article 1 1.2x wider than long; flagellum ~4/5 length of article 3 peduncle, with 3 apical plumose setae. Antenna 2 0.26x length of body, article 2 with a ventromesial process with bilobed apex and much longer than dorsalmesial process; flagellum 1 articulated, 0.22x total antenna length, and a tuft of setae distally. Mandible molar columnar and triturative; right incisor with 3 teeth, right lacinia mobilis with 3 teeth, and left with 5 teeth. Maxilla 1 outer plate without a row of setules, distal margin with 6 robust setae, inner plate shorter than outer plate, bearing 2 robust and plumose setae distally. Maxilla 2 outer plate with an oblique row of 11 plumose setae; middle and inner plate with a row of 7 and 8 plumose setae, respectively. Maxillipedal endite with 2 robust setae on lateral margin, 6 slender setae distally and 3 on transverse apex; palp width 0.37x length, 5 visible articles; articles 2–5 setose mesially; article 3 lobed mesiodistally; article 5 wider than long, 0.25x length of article 4; epipod tapering and rounded distally.</p> <p>Pereopod 1 basis with setose dorsal margin; ventral margin of merus with only 1 robust seta, carpus and propodus with dense robust setation; propodus almost 2x longer than wide. Pereopods 2 and 3 similar, basis without setae on ventral margin, dorsal margin with a proximal tuft of slender setae; ischium longer than merus, distal margin widened, with a robust seta on dorsodistal angle (pereopod 2 with a robust seta on ventrodistal angle); merus with dorsodistal angle slightly produced; carpus and propodus with robust setae on ventral margin; carpus shorter than propodus, with a line of robust setae on ventral margin, dorsal margin of pereopod 3 lacking setae; propodus longer than wide (2.4x pereopod 2 and 2.9x pereopod 3), with a line of robust setae on ventral margin, dorsal margin of pereopod 3 with a line of slender setae; dactylus well developed, curved and bearing a distal unguis. Pereopod 4 0.45x length of pereopod 3, ischium with 2 robust setae; merus, carpus and propodus with posterodistal U-shaped rows of 10, 12, and 8 robust setae, respectively; propodus with a robust seta tridentate distally; dactylus without unguis and with rounded tip. Pereopod 5 longer than 4, basis, ischium and merus with a row of long slender setae on dorsal margin; carpus ventral margin with a single robust seta; ventral margin dactylus slightly hooked. Pereopods 6 and 7 more elongate than 5, basis, ischium and merus with a row of long slender setae on the dorsal margin; propodus of pereopod 7 3.1x longer than wide. Penes near base of uropod, on ventrum of pereonite 7, rami 1.2x basal width, separate and tapering to rounded apices. Pleopod 1 peduncle with 3 robust setae; inner ramus longer than outer ramus (1.3x). Pleopod 2 peduncle with 3 robust setae; inner ramus longer than outer ramus (1.3x); outer ramus subrectangular with apex truncate, outer margin smooth. Appendix masculina inserted mesially and slightly surpassing distal margin of inner ramus (in development). Uropodal peduncle 2.8x longer than wide; endopod almost as wide as long, rounded distally.</p> <p>Etymology. The species epithet pandemus relates to the global pandemic starting in 2020 caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2. During this time the new species was recognised and described by the authors.</p> <p>Remarks. Cleantioides pandemus sp. nov. is closely related to C. bruscai and C. occidentalis by the structure of the subcircular part of the pleotelson. However, it is readily distinguished from both species by the poorly developed rounded-edged lobes (vs strongly developed in C. bruscai and C. occidentalis); these lobes are separated by a very faint furrow, followed by 2 submedian longitudinal rounded ridges (vs absent in C. bruscai and C. occidentalis).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BBA15F1475FFF31CC1847BFE12FF7C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Negromonte, Aurinete Oliveira;Lucatelli, Debora;Paiva, Ricardo José de Carvalho;Souza-Filho, Jesser F.	Negromonte, Aurinete Oliveira, Lucatelli, Debora, Paiva, Ricardo José de Carvalho, Souza-Filho, Jesser F. (2022): Three new species of the genus Cleantioides Kensley and Kaufman, 1978 (Isopoda: Valvifera) from Brazil, with new record of the family Holognathidae from Brazil. Journal of Natural History 56 (13 - 16): 923-941, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2022.2056538, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2022.2056538
03BBA15F147EFFEF1CA88011FED3FDD9.text	03BBA15F147EFFEF1CA88011FED3FDD9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cleantioides tamandarensis Negromonte & Lucatelli & Paiva & Souza-Filho 2022	<div><p>Cleantioides tamandarensis sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figures 9–12)</p> <p>Type material</p> <p>Holotype. Female, 3.1 mm, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-35.09&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-8.77" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -35.09/lat -8.77)">Tamandaré Bay</a>, Pernambuco, (8.77°S, 35.09°W), #2 light trap, 3 October 2013, Pernambuco, MOUFPE 20064.</p> <p>Paratypes. 1 male, 2 females, same as holotype, #1 light trap, 21 July 2012, MOUFPE 20065.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Body 4.0–4.2x longer than wide. Antenna 2 article 2 with a ventromesial process with bilobed apex much longer than dorsalmesial process. Posterior margin of coxae 5–7, epimeral plates 1–4 and ventral margin of pleotelson with plumose setae. Pereopod 4 propodus with robust simple setae; dactylus without unguis and with rounded tip. Pleotelson dorsally almost straight, 0.33x total body length, 1.75x longer than wide; dorsum of distal half with oblique circular plane inclined ~35° from horizontal, occupying 0.5 of pleotelson length, with dorsal sparse short setae, well defined by a sharp marginal ridge extending all around, dorsally with 2 submedian poorly developed rounded-edged lobes, followed by 2 submedian inconspicuous dorsal humps (best seen in lateral view), distal margin rounded or slightly sinuous. Uropodal peduncle and endopod with inner margin and surface bearing plumose setae.</p> <p>Description. Based on holotype.</p> <p>Body 4.2x longer than wide, dorsal poorly rugose. Head 1.75x wider than long, with anteromesial excavated depression; posterior margin convex. Eyes dorsolateral, reniform. Coxae 5–7 and epimeral plates 1–4 with plumose setae on posterior margin. Pleotelson 0.33x of total body length, 1.75x longer than wide, ventral margin with plumose setae. Pleonite 1 free and articulated, barely visible under pereonite 7. Pleonites 2–3 well defined but not articulated, pleonite 4 fused mesially only, lateral margin hidden under pleonite 3; remaining pleotelson parallel-sided and with semicircular apex; dorsum of distal half with oblique circular plane inclined ~35° from horizontal, occupying 0.5 of pleotelson length, with dorsal sparse short setae, well defined by a sharp marginal ridge extending all around, dorsally with 2 submedian poorly developed rounded-edged lobes, followed by 2 submedian inconspicuous dorsal humps (best seen in lateral view), distal margin rounded.</p> <p>Antenna 1 reaching ~1/4 of article 3 antenna 2 peduncle; peduncle article 1 1.2x wider than long; flagellum 1/3 length of article 3 of peduncle, with 8 apical aesthetascs. Antenna 2 0.27x length of body, article 2 with a ventromesial process with bilobed apex and much longer than dorsalmesial process; flagellum of article 1 0.25x antenna total length, with a tuft of setae distally. Mandible molar columnar and triturative; right incisor with 3 teeth, right lacinia mobilis with 3 teeth, left 5 teeth. Maxilla 1 outer plate without a row of setules, distal margin with 6 robust setae, inner plate shorter than outer plate, bearing 2 robust and plumose setae distally. Maxilla 2 outer plate with an oblique row of 11 plumose setae; middle and inner plate with a row of 7 setae. Maxillipedal endite with 2 robust setae on lateral margin, 1 plumose seta mesially and 6 on transverse apex; palp 0.37x wider than length, 5 articles visible but suture between 2 and 3 not articulated; articles 2–5 setose mesially; article 3 mesiodistally lobed; article 5 wider than long, 0.25x length of article 4; epipod tapering and rounded distally.</p> <p>Pereopod 1 basis with setose dorsal margin (plumose setae);ventral margin of merus with 3 setae,carpus and propodus with dense robust setation; propodus almost 2x longer than wide. Pereopods 2 and 3 similar. Pereopod 2 basis with a tuft of plumose setae on both proximal dorsal and ventral margins; ischium longer than merus, distal margin widened, without setae; merus with dorsodistal angle slightly produced, bearing a tuft of robust setae; carpus shorter than propodus, with a line of robust setae on ventral margin; propodus 2.7x longer than wide; dactylus well developed, curved and bearing a distal unguis, a subdistal robust seta and a tuft of slender setae.Pereopod 3 basis without a tuft of plumose setae on both proximal dorsal and ventral margins;ischium longer than merus,distal margin widened,dorsal margin with 4 setae; merus with dorsodistal angle slightly produced, bearing a tuft of robust setae; carpus shorter than propodus, with a line of robust setae on ventral margin; propodus 2.8x longer than wide; dactylus well developed, curved and bearing a distal unguis, a subdistal robust seta and a tuft of slender setae. Pereopod 4 0.45x length of pereopod 3, ischium with 4 robust setae; merus, carpus and propodus with posterodistal U-shaped rows of 8, 17, and 10 robust setae, respectively; propodus with robust simple setae; dactylus without unguis and with rounded tip. Pereopod 5 longer than 4, basis to propodus with a row of long plumose setae on dorsal margin; merus, carpus and propodus with a row of robust setae; ventral margin of dactylus strongly hooked. Pereopods 6 and 7 more elongate than 5, basis to propodus with a row of long plumose setae on dorsal margin; propodus of pereopod 7 3.1x longer than wide. Oostegites present on pereopods 1–5. Pleopod 1 peduncle with 3 robust setae; inner ramus longer than outer ramus (1.2x). Pleopod 2 peduncle with 3 robust setae; inner ramus longer than outer ramus (1.3x), outer ramus subrectangular with rounded apex,outer margin smooth. Uropodal peduncle 3.2x longer than wide; inner margin of peduncle, endopod and surface with plumose setae; endopod almost as wide as long, outer distal margin rounded and inner distal margin subacute.</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet tamandarensis refers to the city of Tamandaré (State of Pernambuco, Brazil), the type locality of this species.</p> <p>Remarks. Cleantioides tamandarensis sp. nov. closely resembles C. planicauda and C. vonprahli in the shape of the pleotelson. However, the new species is distinguished from C. vonprahli by the palp of maxilliped with 5 articles (vs 4), with tufts of plumose setae on coxae 5–7, epimeral plates and lateral margin of pleotelson (vs without any plumose setae), and 6 longitudinal dorsal pigmented lines on pereion (vs 4). Cleantoides tamandarensis sp. nov. differs from C. planicauda (description and illustration in Brusca and Iverson 1985) in having body 4.2x as long as wide (vs 5.2 or more), and pleotelson with 2 submedian poorly developed rounded-edged lobes dorsally, followed by 2 submedian inconspicuous dorsal humps (best seen in lateral view) (vs pleotelson dorsally unadorned).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BBA15F147EFFEF1CA88011FED3FDD9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Negromonte, Aurinete Oliveira;Lucatelli, Debora;Paiva, Ricardo José de Carvalho;Souza-Filho, Jesser F.	Negromonte, Aurinete Oliveira, Lucatelli, Debora, Paiva, Ricardo José de Carvalho, Souza-Filho, Jesser F. (2022): Three new species of the genus Cleantioides Kensley and Kaufman, 1978 (Isopoda: Valvifera) from Brazil, with new record of the family Holognathidae from Brazil. Journal of Natural History 56 (13 - 16): 923-941, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2022.2056538, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2022.2056538
