identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
F67082097211FF962BC1FA6AFBF7FE00.text	F67082097211FF962BC1FA6AFBF7FE00.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ceratothoa Dana 1852	<div><p>Genus Ceratothoa Dana, 1852</p> <p>Ceratothoa Dana, 1852: 303; 1853: 752. – Miers 1876: 104–105. – Haswell 1882: 282. – Schioedte and Meinert 1883: 322–323. – Richardson 1905: 233–234. – Bowman 1978: 217–218. – Brusca 1981: 177–178. – Bruce and Bowman 1989: 1–2. – Horton 2000: 1041. – Martin et al. 2013: 396; 2015 a: 253–254. – Hadfield et al. 2014a: 3–4; 2014b: 449–450; 2016: 41–42. – Martin et al. 2015: 253–254. – Hadfield and Smit 2020: 3–4.</p> <p>Codonophilus Haswell, 1881: 471. – 1882: 283. – Hale 1926: 201, 223.</p> <p>Rhexana Schiöedte and Meinert, 1883: 289–290.</p> <p>Cteatessa Schiöedte and Meinert, 1883: 296–297.</p> <p>Meinertia Stebbing, 1893: 354; 1900: 642, 1910: 103. – Richardson 1905: 236–237. Menzies 1962: 116. – Schultz 1969: 156.</p> <p>Rhexanella Stebbing, 1911: 179.</p> <p>Not Ceratothoa. – Dana 1853: 747. – Richardson 1905: 236. – Schultz 1969: 155. – Kussakin, 1979: 287 [= Glossobius Schiöedte and Meinert, 1883].</p> <p>Type species</p> <p>Cymothoa parallela Otto, 1828 (by subsequent designation, see Martin et al. 2015 a).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F67082097211FF962BC1FA6AFBF7FE00	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Aneesh, Panakkool Thamban;Helna, Ameri Kottarathil;Kumar, Appukuttannair Biju	Aneesh, Panakkool Thamban, Helna, Ameri Kottarathil, Kumar, Appukuttannair Biju (2022): Redescription and further report of two buccal attaching fish parasitic cymothoids, Ceratothoa carinata (Bianconi, 1869) and Cymothoa bychowskyi Avdeev, 1979 (Crustacea: Isopoda) with a new record from the southern India Ocean. Journal of Natural History 56 (17 - 20): 1063-1089, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2022.2099318, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2022.2099318
F67082097212FF972BA0FA5AFD33FE52.text	F67082097212FF972BA0FA5AFD33FE52.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ceratothoa carinata (Bianconi 1869)	<div><p>Ceratothoa carinata (Bianconi, 1869)</p> <p>(Figures 1–4)</p> <p>Cymothoa carinata Bianconi, 1869: 210–211, pl. II, fig. 2(a–b). – Gerstaecker 1901: 258. Cymothoa (Ceratothoa) carinata. – Hilgendorf 1879: 846.</p> <p>Ceratothoa carinata. – Schioedte and Meinert 1883: 327–329, pl. XIII (cym. XX) figs 1–2. – Trilles 1986: 623, table 1; 1994: 116–117; 2008: 23. – Kensley 2001: 232. – Bruce 2007: 278. – Martin et al. 2013: 397–401, figs 1–3. – Nagasawa et al. 2014: 59–61, fig. 1. – Martin et al. 2015: 266–267. – Hadfield et al. 2016: 48–51, fig. 3.</p> <p>Meinertia carinata. – Lanchester 1902: 378. – Stebbing 1910: 103–104. – Trilles 1972a: 1244–1245, 1256, pl. I, photos 5–7; 1972c: 3–7, photos 1–4. – Avdeev 1979b: 48, 50.</p> <p>Codonophilus carinatus. – Nierstrasz 1931: 132.</p> <p>Ceratothoa curvicauda Nunomura, 2006: 36–38, figs 12–13.</p> <p>Ceratothoa sp. – Saito 2009: 7–9, figs 1–2.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F67082097212FF972BA0FA5AFD33FE52	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Aneesh, Panakkool Thamban;Helna, Ameri Kottarathil;Kumar, Appukuttannair Biju	Aneesh, Panakkool Thamban, Helna, Ameri Kottarathil, Kumar, Appukuttannair Biju (2022): Redescription and further report of two buccal attaching fish parasitic cymothoids, Ceratothoa carinata (Bianconi, 1869) and Cymothoa bychowskyi Avdeev, 1979 (Crustacea: Isopoda) with a new record from the southern India Ocean. Journal of Natural History 56 (17 - 20): 1063-1089, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2022.2099318, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2022.2099318
F67082097218FF9D2BD1F982FC43FF24.text	F67082097218FF9D2BD1F982FC43FF24.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cymothoa Fabricius 1793	<div><p>Genus Cymothoa Fabricius, 1793</p> <p>Cymothoa Fabricius, 1793: 503. – Milne Edwards 1840: 264. – Schioedte and Meinert 1884: 223. – Kussakin, 1979: 289. – Brusca 1981: 185. – Brusca and Iverson 1985: 45. – Trilles 1994: 137. – Hadfield et al. 2011: 58; 2013: 153: – Martin et al. 2016: 5.</p> <p>Type species</p> <p>Oniscus oestrum Fabricius, 1793; by subsequent designation (Kussakin 1979).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F67082097218FF9D2BD1F982FC43FF24	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Aneesh, Panakkool Thamban;Helna, Ameri Kottarathil;Kumar, Appukuttannair Biju	Aneesh, Panakkool Thamban, Helna, Ameri Kottarathil, Kumar, Appukuttannair Biju (2022): Redescription and further report of two buccal attaching fish parasitic cymothoids, Ceratothoa carinata (Bianconi, 1869) and Cymothoa bychowskyi Avdeev, 1979 (Crustacea: Isopoda) with a new record from the southern India Ocean. Journal of Natural History 56 (17 - 20): 1063-1089, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2022.2099318, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2022.2099318
F67082097219FF852BA1FBF7FC34FAE5.text	F67082097219FF852BA1FBF7FC34FAE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cymothoa bychowskyi Avdeev 1979	<div><p>Cymothoa bychowskyi Avdeev, 1979</p> <p>(Figures 5–11)</p> <p>Cymothoa bychowskyi Avdeev, 1979a: 230, pl. 6, 7; 1985: 217, fig. 1. – Trilles 1994: 138. – Williams et al. 2000: 157. – Kensley 2001: 232. – Bruce et al. 2002: 174. – Paulay et al. 2003: 479. – Trilles and Bariche 2006: 228. – Rameshkumar et al. 2013: 42, fig. 1(C). – Martin et al. 2016: 6. – Ravichandran et al. 2019: 18, fig. 1J–l.</p> <p>Material examined</p> <p>Four females and two males.</p> <p>Voucher specimens</p> <p>All from Fistularia petimba Lacepède, 1803, 1♀ (ovig., 24.5 mm L, 11.5 mm W), (DABFUK / AR-IS-02); 1♂ (14.5 mm L, 7.0 mm W), (Reg. no. DABFUK/AR-IS-03); 1♀ (ovig., 24.0 mm L, 11.5 mm W))(Reg. no. DABFUK/AR-IS-26); 1♀ (ovig., 25.0 mm L, 12.0 mm W))(Reg. no. DABFUK/AR-IS-27) partially dissected; 1♂ (14.0 mm L, 6.8 mm W), (Reg. no. DABFUK/AR-IS -28) partially dissected, coll. P. T. Aneesh from Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu, south-eastern India, 26 May 2018.</p> <p>Description</p> <p>Ovigerous female (Figures 5–9). Body elongate, 2.1 times as long as greatest width, dorsal surfaces rugose, widest at pereonite 4, narrowest at pereonite 1, lateral margins slightly convex. Cephalon 0.4 times as long as wide, visible in dorsal view, anterior margin rounded, immersed in pereonite 1. Frontal margin rounded to form blunt rostrum and thickened, ventrally folded. Eyes not visible. Pereonite 1 with slight indentations, anterior border slightly indented, anterolateral angle rounded, posterior margins of pereonites smooth, slightly curved laterally. Coxae 2–3 with posteroventral angles acute, posteriorly produced; 4–7 rounded. Pereonites 1–4 increasing in length and width; 5–7 decreasing in width; 5–6 subequal in length; pereonite 7 shortest. Pleon with all pleonites visible; pleonite 1 as wide as pleonite 2; pleonites increasing in width from 3 to 5; pleonites posterior margin smooth; posterolateral angles of pleonite 2 rounded, not posteriorly produced. Pleonite 5 posterior margin indented medially. Pleotelson 0.6 times as long as anterior width, dorsal surface with medial furrow, lateral margins weakly concave, posterior margin sub-truncate, without median point.</p> <p>Antennule stouter than antenna, comprised of 8 articles; article 1, 0.6 times as long as wide; article 2, as long as article 1; article 3, 1.4 times as long as article 1, 1.2 times as long as wide; articles 4–8 gradually decreasing in width; article 8 with 8–10 short, simple terminal setae. Antenna comprised of 9 articles; article 1, 0.6 times as long as wide; article 2, 0.7 times as long as wide, 1 time as long as article 1; article 3, 0.8 times as wide as article 2; article 4 subequal to 3; articles 5–9 gradually decreasing in width; article 9 with 8–10 short, simple terminal setae. Mandibular process ending in acute incisor, mandible palp article 2 without distolateral setae, article 3 without terminal setae. Maxillule simple, with 4 terminal RS. Maxilla mesial lobe partly fused to lateral lobe; lateral lobe and mesial lobe with 4 recurved RS each. Maxilliped weakly segmented, with lamellar oostegite lobe, palp article 2 without setae, article 3 with 4 recurved RS; oostegites lobes without marginal plumose setae.</p> <p>Pereopod 1 basis 1.4 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.7 times as long as basis, 1.7 times as long as greatest width; merus proximal margin without bulbous protrusion; carpus with straight proximal margin; propodus 1.7 times as long as wide; dactylus slender, 1.1 times as long as propodus, 2.2 times as long as basal width. Pereopod 2 basis 1.3 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.6 times as long as basis; merus 0.7 times as long as wide, 0.4 times as long as ischium; propodus 1.2 times as long as wide; dactylus slender, 1.7 times as long as propodus, 2 times as long as basal width. Pereopod 3 basis 1.3 times as long as greatest width; propodus 1.2 times as long as wide, 0.5 times as long as basis; dactylus slender, 1.7 times as long as propodus, 2.3 times as long as basal width. Pereopod 4 basis as long as greatest width; ischium 0.6 times as long as basis, 1.5 times as long as greatest width; merus 0.5 times as long as ischium; propodus 1.1 times as long as wide; dactylus, 2.1 times as long as propodus, 2.8 times as long as basal width. Pereopod 5 basis 1.1 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.6 times as long as basis; propodus 1.3 times as long as wide; dactylus slender, 1.9 times as long as propodus, 2.1 times as long as basal width. Pereopod 6 basis as long as greatest width, ischium 0.7 times as long as basis, propodus 1.3 times as long as wide, dactylus 1.7 times as long as propodus. Pereopod 7 basis 1.1 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.6 times as long as basis; merus as long as wide, 0.5 times as long as ischium; propodus 0.6 times as long as ischium, 1.3 times as long as wide; dactylus, 1.6 times as long as propodus, 2.6 times as long as basal width.</p> <p>Pleopods peduncle without setae, exopod larger than endopod. Pleopod 1 exopod as long as wide, lateral margin weakly convex; endopod as long as wide, lateral margin weakly concave, distally narrowly rounded, mesial margin straight, peduncle 0.4 times as wide as long, without retinaculae. Pleopod 2 exopod 1.1 times as long as wide, lateral margin weakly convex; endopod 1.3 times as long as wide, lateral margin weakly concave, distally narrowly rounded, mesial margin straight, peduncle 0.3 times as wide as long, without retinaculae. Pleopods 3–5 similar to pleopod 2, mesial margins becoming more strongly produced. Pleopods 3–5 endopods with large fleshy folds; folds well developed in pleopods 4 and 5.</p> <p>Uropod 0.8 times the length of pleotelson, peduncle 0.7 times longer than exopod, 0.8 times as long as wide, peduncle lateral margin without setae; rami not extending beyond pleotelson, marginal setae absent, apices narrowly rounded. Endopod apically rounded, 4.4 times as long as greatest width, 0.8 times as long as exopod, lateral margin weakly convex, mesial margin weakly convex. Exopod extending to almost end of endopod, 5.4 times as long as greatest width, apically rounded, lateral margin weakly convex, mesial margin weakly convex.</p> <p>Male (Figures 10–11). Similar to female but smaller, body oval, elongate, 2.1 times as long as wide. Cephalon visible in dorsal view, 0.9 times as long as wide. Pereonite 1 anterolateral margins slightly produced. Pleotelson 2 times as wide as long; posteriorly rounded. Pleopods simple, with fewer folds on endopod. Pleopod 2 with appendix masculina, as long as endopod. Uropod 0.7 times the length of pleotelson, peduncle 0.7 times longer than exopod, 0.7 times as long as wide, peduncle lateral margin without setae; rami not extending beyond pleotelson, marginal setae absent, apices narrowly rounded. Endopod apically rounded, 0.8 times as long as exopod, lateral margin weakly convex, mesial margin weakly convex. Exopod extending to almost end of endopod, apically rounded, lateral margin weakly convex, mesial margin weakly convex.</p> <p>Hosts</p> <p>Known only from the family Fistulariidae: Fistularia petimba Lacepède, 1803 (see Avdeev 1979a; Williams et al. 2000; Rameshkumar et al. 2013; present study) and blue spotted cornetfish Fistularia commersonii Rüppell, 1838 (Williams et al. 2000).</p> <p>Distribution</p> <p>North-western and Western Australia (Avdeev 1979a; Kensley 2001); Guam, Micronesia (Williams et al. 2000), Okinawa, Japan (Williams et al. 2000) and Lakshadweep, India (Rameshkumar et al. 2013); south-west coast India (present study).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F67082097219FF852BA1FBF7FC34FAE5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Aneesh, Panakkool Thamban;Helna, Ameri Kottarathil;Kumar, Appukuttannair Biju	Aneesh, Panakkool Thamban, Helna, Ameri Kottarathil, Kumar, Appukuttannair Biju (2022): Redescription and further report of two buccal attaching fish parasitic cymothoids, Ceratothoa carinata (Bianconi, 1869) and Cymothoa bychowskyi Avdeev, 1979 (Crustacea: Isopoda) with a new record from the southern India Ocean. Journal of Natural History 56 (17 - 20): 1063-1089, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2022.2099318, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2022.2099318
