identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03D187D04947FFBFFF5CFD80FD3CF926.text	03D187D04947FFBFFF5CFD80FD3CF926.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neoathyreacarus Khaustov & Frolov 2022	<div><p>Genus Neoathyreacarus gen. nov.</p> <p>Type species: Neoathyreacarus pygmephoroides sp. nov.</p> <p>Diagnosis (adult female only). With all characters of the family (Khaustov &amp; Frolov 2019). Gnathosoma. Gnathosoma dorsally with two pairs of cheliceral setae (cha, chb); palps ventrally with small accessory setigenous structure medially and baculiform solenidion laterally; palp tibiotarsus without lateral seta, distally with short rodlike eupathid and well developed tibial claw, subcapitulum with only one pair of setae (m), setae n absent. Pharynx weakly sclerotized, not clearly subdivided laterally into pharyngeal pumps. Cheliceral stylets very short and thin.</p> <p>Idiosomal dorsum. Prodorsum with three setae (v1, v2, sc2) and alveolar pits sc1. Bothridia absent. Stigmata located near anterolateral corners of prodorsal shield. Tergite C entire, not subdivided into median and lateral parts.</p> <p>Idiosomal venter. Genital setae absent. Pseudanal segment with three pairs of setae (ps1-3) located ventrally; anal opening small, located ventrally.</p> <p>Legs. Leg I with large tarsal claw ridged on inner surface. Unguinal setae (u’, u”) on tarsus I separated, modified, spine-like, with weak ridges on inner surface. Tarsi II and III with large claws distinctly thickened near their bases. Claws on tarsus IV not thickened basally. Empodium on tarsi II-IV large, weakly plicate on ventral surface. Leg setation. Leg I: Tr 1 (v’), Fe 5 (d, l’, l”, v’, v”), Ge 4 (l’, l”, v’, v”), Ti 6 (2) (k, d, l’, l”, v’, v”, φ1, φ2), Ta 13 (2) (p’, p”, tc’. tc”, ft’, ft”, pl’, pl”, u’, u”, s, pv’, pv”, ω1, ω2); leg II: Tr 1 (v’), Fe 3 (d, l’, v”), Ge 3 (l’, l”, v’), Ti 4 (1) (d, l’, v’, v”, φ), Ta 7 (1) (pl”, tc’, tc”, u’, u”, pv’, pv”, ω); leg III: Tr 1 (v’), Fe 2 (d, v’), Ge 3 (l’, l”, v’), Ti 4 (1) (d, l’, v’, v”, φ), Ta 7 (pl”, tc’, tc”, u’, u”, pv’, pv”); leg IV: Tr 1 (v’), Fe 2 (d, v’), Ge 2 (l”, v’), Ti 4 (1) (d, l’, v’, v”, φ), Ta 6 (pl”, tc’, tc”, u’, pv’, pv”). Solenidion φ on tibiae II-IV located in anterior part of segment.</p> <p>Species included. The genus Neoathyreacarus includes one species: N. pygmephoroides sp. nov.</p> <p>Distribution and hosts. N. pygmephoroides sp. nov. is recorded from Chile on the bolboceratine beetle Bolborhinum tubericeps Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Geotrupidae).</p> <p>Differential diagnosis. The new genus is most similar to Athyreacarus in having three pairs of pseudanal setae, absence of bothridia and setae sc1 represented by alveolar pits. The new genus differs from Athyreacarus in having only one pair of subcapitular setae (two in Athyreacarus), entire tergite C (subdivided into median and lateral parts in Athyreacarus), absence of setae d on genu I and p’ on tarsus IV (present in Athyreacarus), pharynx not clearly subdivided into four pharyngeal pumps (pharynx clearly subdivided into four pharyngeal pumps in Athyreacarus), and very small cheliceral stylets (large in Athyreacarus).</p> <p>Etymology. The name of the new genus is a combination of two words: Greek neos meaning new, and Athyreacarus, the name of closely related genus.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D187D04947FFBFFF5CFD80FD3CF926	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Khaustov, Alexander A.;Frolov, Andrey V.	Khaustov, Alexander A., Frolov, Andrey V. (2022): New taxa of Athyreacaridae (Acari: Heterostigmata) from Neotropical and Afrotropical realms. Zootaxa 5188 (6): 501-520, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5188.6.1
03D187D04947FFBDFF5CF8E1FF52F82A.text	03D187D04947FFBDFF5CF8E1FF52F82A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neoathyreacarus pygmephoroides Khaustov & Frolov 2022	<div><p>Neoathyreacarus pygmephoroides sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 1–6)</p> <p>Description. Female. Length of idiosoma 300 (290–320), width 170 (160–180).</p> <p>Gnathosoma (Fig. 2). Gnathosomal capsule, excluding palps, broadly oval, length 32 (32–34), width 37 (37–46). Dorsal gnathosomal apodeme poorly visible. Two pair of barbed, blunt-tipped cheliceral setae cha 33 (28–33) and chb 10 (10–11). Postpalpal setae (pp) 8 (8–9) blunt-tipped, smooth. Setae m 19 (18–20) pointed and smooth. Setae dFe 16 (15–16) and dGe 22 (20–22) weakly barbed and pointed. Tibial claw slightly hooked, without projection. Cheliceral stylet length 8 (7–9).</p> <p>Idiosomal dorsum (Figs 1A, 5A, 6A–C). All dorsal shields with numerous sparsely distributed puncta (Figs 6A– C). Prodorsal shield without lateral projections. All dorsal setae weakly barbed; setae sc2, c2, d, and f pointed, other dorsal setae blunt-tipped;. Cupules ia on tergite D, im and ip on tergite EF and ih on tergite H small, round. Tergites C, D, and EF with few pore-like structures. Stigmata round. Pseudanal segment completely covered dorsally by tergite H. Lengths of dorsal setae: v1 50 (46–52), v2 20 (19–21), sc2 90 (79–90), c1 53 (46–54), c2 105 (98–105), d 110 (105–110), e 34 (31–40), f 120 (115–120), h1 88 (79–88), h 2 73 (70–77). Distances between setae: v1–v1 23 (18–24), v2–v2 58 (52–58), sc2–sc2 63 (55–63), c1–c1 70 (66–72), c1–c2 31 (27–32), d–d 83 (76–89), e–e 76 (73–80), f–f 83 (82–84), h1–h1 29 (28–36), h1–h2 25 (22–26).</p> <p>Idiosomal venter (Figs 1B, 5B, 6 D–F). All ventral plates with numerous puncta (Figs 6D–F). Setae 3b, 3c, 4a, 4b, and 4c smooth; other ventral setae weakly barbed. Setae 1b, 2c, 3a, ag1 and ps1-3 blunt-tipped, other ventral setae pointed; in most specimens at least one of setae ps1 and/or ps3 bifurcate, in other specimens not bifurcate; setae ps1-3 situated in one transverse row. Ap1 well developed and fused with appr; ap2 well developed and fused with appr; apsej absent; ap3 weakly developed and presented by small oval sclerites; ap4 and ap5 well developed. Aggenital plate with two pairs of aggenital setae (Fig. 6F). Length of mid-sternal plate 64 (63–67), width 61 (61– 65); ratio length/width 1.0. Lengths of ventral setae: 1a 25 (25–28), 1b 15 (15–16), 1c 24 (20–24), 2a 28 (27–29), 2b 28 (25–28), 2c 15 (12–20), 3a 14 (14–23), 3b 28 (27–29), 3c 26 (25–27), 4a 26 (26–27), 4b 34 (28–34), 4c 27 (25–28), ag1 15 (14–15), ag2 33 (29–33), ps1 48/53 (47–50), ps2 29 (24–41), ps3 65/76 (62–72).</p> <p>Legs (Figs 3, 4). Leg I (Fig. 3A): setae l’, l”, v’ of femur, v’ of genu, k of tibia, and all of tarsus smooth, other leg setae barbed; seta l’, l”, v’ of femur, v’ of genu, l”, v’ and k of tibia and (p), (tc), (ft) of tarsus blunt-tipped, other leg setae pointed; seta l’ of femur spiniform, situated very close to d. Lengths of solenidia ω1 15 (14–15), ω2 7 (7), φ1 10 (10–11), φ2 6 (6–7); all solenidia digitiform. Leg II (Fig. 3B): solenidia ω 10 (10–14) and φ 3 (3) digitiform; all leg setae weakly barbed; setae d, l’ of femur and (pv) of tarsus blunt-tipped, other leg setae pointed. Leg III (Fig. 4A) similar in shape and length to leg II; solenidion φ 3 (3–4) digitiform; all leg setae weakly barbed; setae v’ of trochanter, d of femur and (pv) of tarsus blunt-tipped, other leg setae pointed. Leg IV (Fig. 4B): solenidion φ 4 (4) digitiform; all leg setae weakly barbed; setae v’ of femur and genu blunt-tipped, other leg setae pointed.</p> <p>Type material. Female holotype, slide No. ZISP T-Ath-011, Chile, Termas de Chillán, 15.I.2010, on Bolborhinum tubericeps. Paratypes: 24 females, same data.</p> <p>Type deposition. The holotype and five paratypes are deposited in the collection of the Zoological Institute of RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia; other paratypes are deposited in the collection of the Tyumen State University Museum of Zoology, Tyumen, Russia.</p> <p>Etymology. The name of the new species pygmephoroides refers to its morphological (not phylogenetic) similarity to some species of the superfamily Pygmephoroidea sharing the following characters: subcapitulum with only one pair of setae, tergite C not divided into three parts, and similar position of anal opening and pseudanal setae.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D187D04947FFBDFF5CF8E1FF52F82A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Khaustov, Alexander A.;Frolov, Andrey V.	Khaustov, Alexander A., Frolov, Andrey V. (2022): New taxa of Athyreacaridae (Acari: Heterostigmata) from Neotropical and Afrotropical realms. Zootaxa 5188 (6): 501-520, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5188.6.1
03D187D04943FFBBFF5CFA92FAA2FA70.text	03D187D04943FFBBFF5CFA92FAA2FA70.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Athyreacarus Lindquist, Kaliszewski and Rack 1990	<div><p>Genus Athyreacarus Lindquist, Kaliszewski and Rack, 1990</p> <p>Type species: Athyreacarus pleiotretus Lindquist, Kaliszewski and Rack, 1990, by original designation.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D187D04943FFBBFF5CFA92FAA2FA70	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Khaustov, Alexander A.;Frolov, Andrey V.	Khaustov, Alexander A., Frolov, Andrey V. (2022): New taxa of Athyreacaridae (Acari: Heterostigmata) from Neotropical and Afrotropical realms. Zootaxa 5188 (6): 501-520, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5188.6.1
03D187D04943FFB2FF5CF9CEFEFDFACA.text	03D187D04943FFB2FF5CF9CEFEFDFACA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Athyreacarus staturosus Khaustov & Frolov 2022	<div><p>Athyreacarus staturosus sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 7–13)</p> <p>Description. Female. Body broadly oval. Length of idiosoma 635 (565–750), width 360 (330–445).</p> <p>Gnathosoma (Fig. 8). Gnathosomal capsule, excluding palps, almost round, length 74 (67–79), width 75 (66– 80). Dorsal gnathosomal apodeme not evident. Two pairs of barbed, blunt-tipped cheliceral setae cha 44 (38–56) and chb 33 (27–41). Postpalpal setae (pp) 17 (15–18) blunt-tipped, with some weak barbs in distal half. Setae m 43 (33–44) and n 85 (62–88) pointed; setae m smooth, n weakly barbed. Setae dFe 37 (27–41) and dGe 39 (30– 40) barbed; setae dFe blunt-tipped, dGe pointed. Tibial claw slightly hooked, with distinct subapical projection. Pharynx typical for the genus. Ass short, with small distal projection. Palpal tibiotarsus with short spiniform seta l” anterolaterad palpal solenidion, rather long eupathid-like seta distally and very short setiform structure anteriad ass. Cheliceral stylets 11 (10–13) relatively short and thin.</p> <p>Idiosomal dorsum (Figs 7A, 11, 13A, D). All dorsal shields with numerous sparsely distributed puncta (Figs 13A, D). Prodorsal shield without lateral projections. Setae sc1 completely absent, or in some specimens represented by poorly visible alveolar pits (Fig. 13D). All dorsal setae weakly blunt-tipped and weakly barbed. Cupules ia on tergite D, im, ip on tergite EF and ih on tergite H very small, round. Tergites C, D, and EF with pore-like structures typical for the genus. Stigmata round. Pseudanal segment almost completely covered by tergite H. Lengths of dorsal setae: v1 94 (70 – 125), v2 73 (73 – 75), sc2 160 (135 – 175), c1 140 (130 – 185), c2 150 (145 – 195), d 145 (130 – 180), e 120 (105 – 150), f 170 (140 – 180), h1 170 (145 – 195), h2 175 (150 – 200). Distances between setae: v1–v1 58 (55 – 78), v2–v2 85 (80 – 105), sc2–sc2 120 (115 – 145), c1–c1 145 (135 – 180), c1–c2 77 (65 – 87), d–d 180 (145 – 190), e–e 185 (145 – 205), f–f 200 (175 – 245), h1–h1 145 (120 – 150), h1–h2 25 (24 – 35).</p> <p>Idiosomal venter (Figs 7B, 112, 13B, C). All ventral plates with numerous puncta (Figs 13B, C). Setae ps1 and ps2 weakly barbed; other ventral setae smooth. Setae 1c pointed; other ventral setae weakly blunt-tipped; setae 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b, 3c, 4a, 4b, 4c, and ag1 swollen basally and attenuate distally (Figs 13 B, C). Ap5 long, ap3 and ap4 fused; apsej not evident. Aggenital plate with two pairs of aggenital setae.Anal opening ventral. Pseudanal setae located ventrally Length of mid-sternal plate 128 (96–128), width 145 (120–145); ratio length/width 0.8. Lengths of ventral setae: 1a 39 (34 – 43), 1b 34 (29 – 37), 1c 96 (73 – 99), 2a 45 (43 – 49), 2b 39 (38 – 50), 2c 40 (36 – 53), 3a 29 (27 – 35), 3b 43 (42 – 51), 3c 40 (34 – 46), 4a 44 (38 – 55), 4b 45 (39 – 61), 4c 43 (40 – 52), ag1 41 (40 – 60), ag2 79 (79 – 96), ps1 110 (79 – 140), ps2 125 (105 – 145), ps3 43 (31 – 59).</p> <p>Legs (Figs 9, 10). Leg I (Fig. 9A): setae v’ of trochanter and d of femur and genu barbed, other setae smooth; setae d of femur, v’ of genu, d, l’, v” of tibia pointed, other leg setae weakly blunt-tipped; lengths of solenidia ω1 15 (13–16), ω2 14 (11–14), φ1 11 (10–11), φ2 12 (10–12); all solenidia digitiform. Tarsal claw very thick and blunttipped. Leg II (Fig. 9B): solenidia ω 14 (12–14) and φ 13 (11–14) digitiform; seta d of femur barbed, other setae smooth; seta u” very short, spiniform; seta v’ of trochanter with swollen basal half and attenuate distally; setae (tc) with widened and flattened tips; setae (pv) weakly blunt-tipped, other setae pointed. Tarsal claws distinctly smaller than in other Athyreacarus species. Empodium with distinct dorsal longitudinal striation. Leg III (Fig. 10A) similar in shape and length to leg II; solenidion φ 12 (11–14) digitiform; setae d of femur, l” of genu and d of tibia barbed, other setae smooth; seta u” very short, spiniform; seta v’ of trochanter with swollen basal half and attenuate distally; setae (tc) with widened and flattened tips; setae v’ of trochanter, d of femur and (pv) weakly blunt-tipped, other setae pointed. Claws and empodium as on tarsus II. Leg IV (Fig. 10B): solenidion φ 14 (14–16) digitiform; setae d of femur, l” of genu, d of tibia and p’ barbed, other setae smooth; seta v’ of trochanter with swollen basal half and attenuate distally; seta v’ of femur thickened in basal half; seta tc’ with widened and flattened tip; setae v’ of trochanter, d of femur, v’ of genu, and p’ weakly blunt-tipped, other setae pointed. Claws and empodium as on tarsi II and III.</p> <p>Type material. Female holotype, slide No. ZISP T-Ath-012, Argentina, Catamarca Prov., Londres, 7-17.II.2015, G.L. Agnoli, on Zefevazia cantisani Martinez. Paratypes: 7 females, same data; 17 females, Argentina, Catamarca Prov., Punta de Balasto, II.2015, G.L. Agnoli, on Zefevazia cantisani; 1 female, Argentina, Catamarca Prov., Belen, II.2013, G.L. Agnoli, on Zefevazia cantisani.</p> <p>Type deposition. The holotype and five paratypes are deposited in the collection of the Zoological Institute of RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia; other paratypes are deposited in the collection of the Tyumen State University Museum of Zoology, Tyumen, Russia.</p> <p>Differential diagnosis. The new species considerably differs from other Athyreacarus species in having very short spiniform setae u” on tarsi II and III (always seta-like in other Athyreacarus), setae 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b, 3c, 4a, 4b, 4c, and ag1 swollen basally and attenuate distally (not modified in other Athyreacarus), palp tibiotarsus ventrally with short spiniform seta l” (absent in other Athyreacarus).</p> <p>Etymology. The name of the new species is a Latin word staturosus meaning gigantic and refers to extremely large body size.</p> <p>Remarks. The considerable differences in the new species compared to other Athyreacarus may represent another genus. However, the most sufficient difference (presence of seta l” on palpal tibiotarsus) is a plesiomorphic character state and not useful for creating a new taxon. However, apomorphic characters such as very short spiniform setae u” on tarsi II and III, unusually small cheliceral stylets, and modifications of most ventral idiosomal setae could be helpful. The discovery of other species with similar character states may result in creation of another supraspecific taxon.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D187D04943FFB2FF5CF9CEFEFDFACA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Khaustov, Alexander A.;Frolov, Andrey V.	Khaustov, Alexander A., Frolov, Andrey V. (2022): New taxa of Athyreacaridae (Acari: Heterostigmata) from Neotropical and Afrotropical realms. Zootaxa 5188 (6): 501-520, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5188.6.1
03D187D0494AFFAFFF5CFA95FD20FD42.text	03D187D0494AFFAFFF5CFA95FD20FD42.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Athyreacarus camerikae Khaustov & Frolov 2022	<div><p>Athyreacarus camerikae sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 14–20)</p> <p>Description. Female. Body broadly fusiform. Length of idiosoma 405 (350–405), width 230 (190–255).</p> <p>Gnathosoma (Fig. 15). Gnathosomal capsule, excluding palps, broadly oval, length 64 (61–64), width 66 (64– 69). One pair of barbed, blunt-tipped cheliceral setae cha 29 (27–29). Postpalpal setae (pp) 12 (11–12) blunt-tipped, with tiny subapical barbs. Setae m 10 (9–10) smooth and blunt-tipped, n 53 (51–54) pointed and barbed. Setae dFe 14 (14–16) and dGe 36 (32–36) weakly barbed; setae dFe blunt-tipped, dGe pointed. Tibial claw very small, with tiny basal projection. Pharynx typical for the genus. Ass almost three times shorter than palpal solenidion. Tiny eupathid-like seta on palpal tibiotarsus located dorsally. Cheliceral stylet length 20 (18–22).</p> <p>Idiosomal dorsum (Figs 14A, 18, 20A). All dorsal shields with tiny puncta (Fig. 20A). Prodorsal shield without lateral projections. Setae sc1 present, strongly reduced to alveolar remnants (Fig. 20A). All dorsal setae weakly barbed; setae v2 and e blunt-tipped, other dorsal setae pointed. Cupules ia on tergite D, im, ip on tergite EF and ih on tergite H small, round. Tergites C, D, and EF with pore-like structures typical for the genus. Stigmata round. Pseudanal segment shorter than tergite H. Lengths of dorsal setae: v1 73 (72–74), v2 34 (30–35), sc2 140 (140– 145), c1 125 (120–125), c2 150 (145–150), d 140 (130–145), e 37 (33–39), f 145 (120–145), h1 115 (95–115), h2 110 (100–110). Distances between setae: v1–v1 47 (39–48), v2–v2 75 (68–80), sc1–sc1 78 (68–84), sc2–sc2 89 (79–89), c1–c1 87 (66–88), c1–c2 49 (46–50), d–d 95 (77–96), e–e 88 (76–89), f–f 91 (76–94), h1–h1 52 (47–52), h1–h2 20 (15–21).</p> <p>Idiosomal venter (Figs 14B, 19, 20B–D). All ventral plates with tiny puncta (Figs 20B–D). All ventral setae weakly barbed. Setae 1b and 2c blunt-tipped, other ventral setae pointed. Ap5 long, extending beyond bases of setae 4a. Aggenital plate with three pairs of aggenital setae (Fig. 20D). Female holotype with additional pair of setae on coxisternal fields III (3x), other specimens with normal three pairs of setae (Fig. 20C). Anal opening terminal. Length of mid-sternal plate 68 (66–68), width 42 (42–46); ratio length/width 1.4–1.6. Lengths of ventral setae: 1a 39 (39–45), 1b 27 (23–30), 1c 27 (27–30), 2a 53 (51–55), 2b 41 (40–42), 2c 33 (25–34), 3a 35 (26–35), 3b 48 (41–48), 3c 47 (43–48), 4a 47 (46–48), 4b 56 (55–57), 4c 41 (35–42), ag1 50 (42–50), ag2 62 (47–63), ag3 58 (48–58), ps1 64 (59–65), ps2 69 (61–70), ps3 42 (41–48).</p> <p>Legs (Figs 16, 17). Leg I (Fig. 16A): setae l’, v’ of femur, v’ of genu, k of tibia, and s, pv’, pv”, pl’, (p), (tc), (ft) of tarsus smooth, other leg setae barbed; setae l’, v’ of femur, v’ of genu, v’ and k of tibia and s, pv”, (p), (tc), (ft) of tarsus blunt-tipped, other leg setae pointed; lengths of solenidia ω1 12 (11–12), ω2 10 (9–10), φ1 11 (11–12), φ2 9 (8–9); all solenidia digitiform. Leg II (Fig. 16B): solenidia ω 12 (11–12) and φ 10 (9–10) digitiform; setae (u) smooth, other setae weakly barbed; setae l’ of femur blunt-tipped, other leg setae pointed. Leg III (Fig. 17A) similar in shape and length to leg II; solenidion φ 10 (9–10) digitiform; setae (u) smooth, other setae weakly barbed; all setae pointed. Leg IV (Fig. 17B): solenidion φ 10 (9–10) digitiform; all leg setae weakly barbed; seta p’ blunttipped, other leg setae pointed.</p> <p>Type material. Female holotype, slide No. ZISP T-Ath-013, Republic of South Africa, Northern Cape Prov., Brandvlei, 12-14.VI.1997, Namibiobolbus helgae Gussmann and Scholtz.</p> <p>Paratypes: 8 females, same data.</p> <p>Type deposition. The holotype and two paratypes are deposited in the collection of the Zoological Institute of RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia; other paratypes are deposited in the collection of the Tyumen State University Museum of Zoology, Tyumen, Russia.</p> <p>Differential diagnosis. The new species is most similar to A. pseudoindicus Khaustov and Frolov, 2021 in having similar setal lengths on idiosoma, presence of one pair of cheliceral setae, presence of cupuli ih and presence of setae 1c. The new species clearly differs from A. pseudoindicus only by the presence of tiny setae sci (completely absent in A. pseudoindicus).</p> <p>Also females of the new species are phoretic on beetles of the genus Namibiobolbus, while A. pseudoindicus phoretic on beetles of the genus Mimobolbus.</p> <p>Etymology. The new species named after Anne M. Camerik who passed away in 2021, for her contribution to study of heterostigmatic mites of South Africa.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D187D0494AFFAFFF5CFA95FD20FD42	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Khaustov, Alexander A.;Frolov, Andrey V.	Khaustov, Alexander A., Frolov, Andrey V. (2022): New taxa of Athyreacaridae (Acari: Heterostigmata) from Neotropical and Afrotropical realms. Zootaxa 5188 (6): 501-520, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5188.6.1
03D187D04957FFACFF5CFD11FA19FD80.text	03D187D04957FFACFF5CFD11FA19FD80.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Athyreacaridae Lindquist, Kaliszewski and Rack 1990	<div><p>Key to females of world genera and species of Athyreacaridae (based on Khaustov &amp; Frolov 2019, 2021)</p> <p>1. Setae sc1 vestigial or setiform, sometimes absent, not located in bothridia; three pairs of pseudanal setae................ 2</p> <p>- Setae sc1 clavate, located in bothridia; two pairs of pseudanal setae............................................................................................... Bembidiacarus, with one species, B. eidelbergi Khaustov, 2000</p> <p>2. Subcapitulum with two pairs of setae; tergite C divided into median and two lateral parts; genu I with five setae; seta p’ on tarsus IV present … Athyreacarus........................................................................ 3</p> <p>- Subcapitulum with one pair of setae; tergite C not divided into median and two lateral parts; genu I with four setae; seta p’ on tarsus IV absent........................... Neoathyreacarus gen. nov., with one species, N. pygmephoroides sp. nov.</p> <p>3. With two pairs of cheliceral setae (cha, chb)............................................................... 4</p> <p>- With one pair of cheliceral setae (cha)..................................................................... 9</p> <p>4. Setae u” on tarsi II and III setiform; palpal tibiotarsus without ventral seta l”; ventral idiosomal setae not swollen basally.. 5</p> <p>- Setae u” on tarsi II and III very short, spiniform; palpal tibiotarsus with ventral seta l”; most of ventral idiosomal setae swollen in basal half........................................................................ A. staturosus sp. nov.</p> <p>5. With three pairs of aggenital setae........................................................................ 6</p> <p>- With two pairs of aggenital setae............................................. A. latus Khaustov and Frolov, 2019</p> <p>6. Dorsal and ventral idiosomal setae not thickened in basal part, at least some dorsal idiosomal setae very long; cheliceral stylets without subapical tooth; tergites D, EF and H without scale-like microsculpture................................... 7</p> <p>- Most dorsal and ventral idiosomal setae thickened in basal part, all dorsal idiosomal setae short; cheliceral stylets with subapical tooth; tergites D, EF and H with scale-like microsculpture.................. A. brevisetosus Khaustov and Frolov, 2020</p> <p>7. Prodorsal shield with lateral projections; cupules on tergites D and EF not visible.................................. 8</p> <p>- Prodorsal shield without lateral projections; cupules on tergites D and EF well developed................................................................................................ A. primitivus Khaustov and Frolov, 2017</p> <p>8. Setae sc1 distinct, at least 6 in length; ap1 narrow, almost as wide as ap2.......... A. angustus Khaustov and Frolov, 2019</p> <p>- Setae sc1 reduced to alveolar vestiges; ap1 wide, much wider than ap2............. A. ovalis Khaustov and Frolov, 2019</p> <p>9. Setae c1 absent, setae v2 vestigial; setae sc2, c2, d and f shorter than greatly attenuated ps1,2........................ 10</p> <p>- Setae c1 present, setae v2 well developed; setae sc2, c2, d and f ultralong, exceeding setae ps 1,2 in length.............. 11</p> <p>10. Setae sc2, c2, d, f, h1, and h2 with distinctly thickened basal half; setae e very short, spiniform; puncta on segment ps small, similar to puncta on tergite H and aggenital plate.............................. A. grandis Khaustov and Frolov, 2019</p> <p>- Setae sc2, c2, d, f, h1, and h2 not thickened; setae e well developed, filiform; puncta on segment ps large, distinctly larger than puncta on tergite H and aggenital plate.......................... A. pleiotretus Lindquist, Kaliszewski and Rack, 1990</p> <p>11. Setae ag1 pointed................................................................................... 12</p> <p>- Setae ag1 distinctly blunt-tipped........................................................................ 17</p> <p>12. Setae 1c absent..................................................................................... 13</p> <p>- Setae 1c present..................................................................................... 14</p> <p>13. Setae c1 much longer than distance between their bases, dorsal shields with distinct sparsely distributed puncta.............................................................................. A. longisetus Khaustov and Frolov, 2021</p> <p>- Setae c1 shorter than distance between their bases, dorsal shields without distinct puncta, with rough microsculpture........................................................................... A. reductus Khaustov and Frolov, 2021</p> <p>14. Setae 2c blunt-tipped, setae e longer than 25.............................................................. 15</p> <p>- Setae 2c pointed, sometimes 2 c bifurcate, setae e shorter than 16................ A. africanus Khaustov and Frolov, 2021</p> <p>15. Cupules ih present................................................................................... 16</p> <p>- Cupules ih absent....................................................... A. indicus Khaustov and Frolov, 2020</p> <p>16. Setae sc1 completely absent......................................... A. pseudoindicus Khaustov and Frolov, 2021</p> <p>- Setae sc1 present, very short............................................................ A. camerikae sp. nov.</p> <p>17. With two pairs of aggenital setae........................................................................ 18</p> <p>- With three pairs of aggenital setae....................................................................... 19</p> <p>18. Setae c2 about 10 times longer than c1; most of dorsal and ventral idiosomal setae pointed; length of idiosoma 420-450....................................................................... A. vazdemelloi Khaustov and Frolov, 2019</p> <p>- Setae c2 at most three times longer than c1; most of dorsal and ventral idiosomal setae blunt-tipped; length of idiosoma 240- 270.................................................................. A. pusillus Khaustov and Frolov, 2019</p> <p>19. At least setae tc” on tarsi II and III with spatulate tips; ap3 well separated from ap4 on either side.................... 20</p> <p>- All setae on tarsi II and III with pointed tips, none with spatulate tips; ap3 nearly contiguous with ap4 on either side............................................................................. A. similis Khaustov and Frolov, 2019</p> <p>20. Setae tc’ on tarsi II and III with distinctly spatulate tips; puncta of idiosomal plates relatively large, sparsely distributed; length of idiosoma 440-465................................................. A. magnificus Khaustov and Frolov, 2019</p> <p>- Setae tc’ on tarsi II and III with pointed tips; puncta of idiosomal plates very small, densely distributed; length of idiosoma 305- 405................................................................. A. variabilis Khaustov and Frolov, 2019</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D187D04957FFACFF5CFD11FA19FD80	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Khaustov, Alexander A.;Frolov, Andrey V.	Khaustov, Alexander A., Frolov, Andrey V. (2022): New taxa of Athyreacaridae (Acari: Heterostigmata) from Neotropical and Afrotropical realms. Zootaxa 5188 (6): 501-520, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5188.6.1
