identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
C56D87819828A51DFF02FD17968FFC4B.text	C56D87819828A51DFF02FD17968FFC4B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca 2009	<div><p>Siamspinops Dankittipakul &amp; Corronca, 2009</p> <p>Type species. Siamspinops spinosissimus Dankittipakul &amp; Corronca, 2009, by original designation.</p> <p>Diagnosis. For genus description and diagnosis, see Dankittipakul &amp; Corronca (2009).</p> <p>Distribution. India (new record), Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Thailand, Taiwan) (Simon 1901; Kayashima 1943; Dankittipakul &amp; Corronca 2009; present data).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C56D87819828A51DFF02FD17968FFC4B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Kadam, Gautam;Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu;Tripathi, Rishikesh	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Kadam, Gautam, Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu, Tripathi, Rishikesh (2022): First record of Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca, 2009 from India, first description of the female of Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931), and a catalogue of Indian selenopid fauna (Araneae, Selenopidae). Zootaxa 5194 (1): 109-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.6
C56D87819828A518FF02FBD596F4FEB1.text	C56D87819828A518FF02FBD596F4FEB1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Siamspinops garoensis Kadam, Tripathi & Sankaran 2022	<div><p>Siamspinops garoensis Kadam, Tripathi &amp; Sankaran, 2022 sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs 1–4, 8</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet is an adjective and refers to the type locality of the new species.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: ♂ from INDIA: Meghalaya: North Garo Hills: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=90.5995&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=25.923666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 90.5995/lat 25.923666)">Resu Haluapara</a> (25°55.42′N, 90°35.97′E; 197 m a.s.l.), 05 April 2022, from tree trunk, by hand, G. Kadam (ZSI/ WGRC /I. R.-INV.20973). Paratypes: 1 ♀, same data as for the holotype; 1 ♀, same data as for the holotype except West Jaintia Hills: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=92.472&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=25.506834" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 92.472/lat 25.506834)">Raliang</a> (25°30.41′N, 92°28.32′E; 1089 m a.s.l.), 08 April 2022 (ZSI/ WGRC /I. R.-INV.20974 &amp; 20975).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Siamspinops garoensis sp. nov. is most similar to Siamspinops formosensis (Kayashima, 1934) as both share a short, hook-shaped median apophysis, semi-circular posterior epigynal pockets, and M-shaped uterus externus, but can be distinguished by the following combination of characters: males by distally rounded ventral branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis (vs. distally narrow in S. formosensis), dorsal branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis broad along its entire length in ventral view (vs. distally narrow in S. formosensis) and conductor with sclerotised retrolateral apex ending at 3-o’ clock ventrally (vs. 4-o’ clock in S. formosensis) (compare Figs 2H, 4A with Yu et al. 2019: figs 9, 15); females by deep posteromedian excavation of epigyne (vs. less deep in S. formosensis) and copulatory ducts with 14 turns (vs. 9 turns in S. formosensis) (compare Figs 3H–I, 4C–E with Yu et al. 2019: figs 4–5, 12–13).</p> <p>Description. Male (holotype, Figs 2A–F, colouration in alcohol): Carapace, eye region, clypeus, chelicerae, endites, labium yellowish brown; sternum, leg and palp segments, opisthosoma, spinnerets creamy-white; carapace, dorsal chelicerae, dorsal and lateral opisthosoma, leg and palp segments with olive green blotches and streaks. Carapace covered with scattered fine white hairs, with brownish streaks; thoracic margin with curved setae (Fig. 2B). Eyes on low tubercles, encircled with black pigment (Fig. 2C). Chelicerae significantly longer than those of female; promargin with four and retromargin with two teeth (Figs 2E–F). Sternum round, hirsute (Fig. 2D). Opisthosoma sub-oval, hirsute (Fig. 2A). All tarsi with well-developed claw tufts. Body length 8.64. Carapace 4.07 long, 4.70 wide. Opisthosoma 4.58 long, 3.94 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: ALE 0.11, AME 0.21, PLE 0.23, PME 0.21; ALE–ALE 1.71, AME–ALE 0.49, AME–AME 0.17, PLE–PLE 2.09, PME–PLE 0.41, PME–PME 0.84. Clypeus height at AMEs 0.12, at ALEs 0.26. Length of chelicerae 1.82. Length of palp and legs: palp 4.71 [1.62, 0.66, 0.82, 1.61], I 17.01 [5.11, 1.91, 4.55, 3.88, 1.56], II 21.96 [7.02, 2.11, 6.05, 5.12, 1.66], III 20.19 [6.98, 1.79, 5.42, 4.53, 1.47], IV 16.87 [5.81, 1.64, 4.36, 3.77, 1.29]. Leg formula: 2341. Spination of palp: femur pld 1 plv 3 do 3 rlv 5, patella pl 1 pld 2 do 2, tibia pl 2 pld 3 do 2 rl 1 rld 2, tarsus/cymbium pl 2 do 2 rld 1; legs: femur I pl 2 do 3, II–IV do 3; patellae I–IV 0; tibia I plv 7 rlv 8, II plv 7 rlv 7, III–IV 0; metatarsus I plv 6 rlv 6, II plv 6 rlv 5, III rlv 2, IV 0; tarsi I–IV 0.</p> <p>Palp (Figs 2G–J, 4A–B): ventral branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis small, distally rounded and spoonshaped (Figs 2H–I, 4A–B; vRTA); dorsal branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis large, laminate, 2x wider than ventral branch of retrolateral tibial apophysis (Figs 2H–J, 4A–B; dRTA). Cymbium rounded, with long marginal setae (Figs 2G, I–J). Tegulum nearly flat, rounded (Figs 2H, 4A–B; T). Median apophysis small, unbranched, hookshaped (Figs 2H–I, 4A–B; MA). Conductor T-shaped, with long, folded, sclerotised and pointed retrolateral apex (Figs 2H–I, 4A–B; C, arrow 1). Embolus filiform, originating retrolaterally at 3-o’ clock position (left palp in ventral view), encircling tegulum, with short and sclerotised embolic base, with chisel-shaped tip, with a slight constriction near the tip (Figs 2G–I, 4A–B; E, EB, arrow 2).</p> <p>Female (paratype, Figs 1A, 3A–F, colouration in alcohol): General aspects essentially as in male except the following: habitus dull pinkish creamy-white with pale dark blotches and streaks; opisthosoma posteriorly with indistinct chevron pattern (Fig. 3A). Chelicerae comparatively short; promargin with three teeth, retromargin with two (Figs 3E–F). Body length 10.36. Carapace 3.84 long, 4.56 wide. Opisthosoma 6.52 long, 4.95 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: ALE 0.10, AME 0.19, PLE 0.21, PME 0.19; ALE–ALE 1.72, AME–ALE 0.50, AME–AME 0.14, PLE–PLE 1.91, PME–PLE 0.26, PME–PME 0.82. Clypeus height at AMEs 0.12, at ALEs 0.21. Length of chelicerae 1.47. Length of palp and legs: palp 3.61 [1.09, 0.60, 0.70, 1.22], I 13.80 [4.18, 1.63, 3.74, 3.02, 1.23], II 12.76 [4.19, 1.29, 3.38, 2.73, 1.17], III 16.12 [5.74, 1.55, 4.35, 3.33, 1.15], IV 14.14 [5.05, 1.37, 3.59, 3.01, 1.12]. Leg formula: 3412. Spination of palp: femur pld 1 plv 3 do 3 rld 1, tarsus pl 2 pld 2 do 2 rl 2 rld 1; legs: tibia I plv 8 rlv 8, II plv 7 rlv 7, III–IV pld 1; metatarsus II plv 6 rlv 5, III–IV 0. Genitalia (Figs 3G–I, 4C–E): epigyne with posteromedian excavation (Figs 3G–I, 4C–E; arrow 3), with semi-circular posterior epigynal pockets having sclerotised triangular prolateral rims, retrolateral rims indistinct (Figs 3G–H, 4C; EP). Copulatory openings small, semi-circular, obliquely oriented, with sclerotised prolateral rims (Figs 3G–H, 4C; CO), enclosing a broad epigynal median field having wavy lateral margins (Figs 3G–H, 4C; MF). Copulatory ducts long, compact, convoluted with 14 turns (Figs 3I, 4D–E; CD). Spermathecae short, lying posteromedially (Fig. 4E; S). Proximal part of copulatory ducts, spermathecae and fertilization ducts covered by M-shaped, hyaline uterus externus (Figs 3I, 4D; UE). Accessory bulbs of spermathecae thick, anteriorly oriented (Figs 3I, 4D–E; AB). Fertilization ducts leaf-like, diverging (Fig. 4E; FD).</p> <p>Variation. Female (n=2): body length 9.43–10.36. Second female specimen (Fig. 1B) shows variation in leg spination as follows: tibia I plv 7 rlv 8, II plv 7 rlv 8, metatarsus II plv 5 rlv 5.</p> <p>Distribution. Known only from Meghalaya, India (Figs 1C–D, 8).</p> <p>Remarks. First record of the genus from India.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C56D87819828A518FF02FBD596F4FEB1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Kadam, Gautam;Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu;Tripathi, Rishikesh	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Kadam, Gautam, Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu, Tripathi, Rishikesh (2022): First record of Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca, 2009 from India, first description of the female of Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931), and a catalogue of Indian selenopid fauna (Araneae, Selenopidae). Zootaxa 5194 (1): 109-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.6
C56D8781982FA514FF02FF33910EFCF1.text	C56D8781982FA514FF02FF33910EFCF1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely 1931)	<div><p>Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931)</p> <p>Figs 5–7</p> <p>Selenops shevaroyensis Gravely, 1931: 259, fig. 15C (♂).</p> <p>Makdiops shevaroyensis Sankaran et al., 2020: 598, figs 3A–C, 4A–D (♂).</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: ♂ from INDIA: Tamil Nadu: Salem, Yercaud, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=78.2&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=11.766666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 78.2/lat 11.766666)">Servarayan Hills</a> (=Shevaroy Hills) (11°46′N, 78°12′E; 1410 m a.s.l.), 1929, Mason (NZC-ZSI, Kolkata) (holotype images are presented in Sankaran et al. 2020: figs 3A–C, 4A–D).</p> <p>Other material examined. INDIA: Tamil Nadu: 1 ♀, Salem, Yercaud, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=78.21667&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=11.766666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 78.21667/lat 11.766666)">Pagoda Point</a> (11°46′N, 78°13′E; 1355 m a.s.l.), 04 December 2017, from bark, by hand, M.S. Pradeep &amp; Jimmy Paul (ADSH10275).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Females of M. shevaroyensis are similar to the females of Makdiops mahishasura Crews &amp; Harvey, 2011 as both share deep posteromedian excavation of epigyne, transversely oriented membranous epigynal field with M-shaped anterior margin, longitudinally oriented posterior epigynal pockets, wide copulatory openings and broad copulatory ducts, but can be distinguished from the latter by the following combination of features: obliquely oriented tubular part of copulatory ducts (vs. longitudinally oriented in M. mahishasura) and globular spermathecae with turns (vs. reniform without turns in M. mahishasura) (compare Figs 5F–H, 6A, C with Crews &amp; Harvey 2011: figs 85–86).</p> <p>Description. Female (Figs 5A–E, colouration in alcohol): Carapace, clypeus, chelicerae pale brown, carapace with indistinct brownish streaks; endites, labium, sternum, leg and palp segments, spinnerets yellowish brown, leg segments with brownish annulations and blotches, palp segments with brownish blotches; opisthosoma creamy white with black posteriorly, dorsum with scattered brownish black spots and blotches (Fig. 5A). Carapace with black, fine setae intermingled with short stiff setae, laterally with patches of white setae (Fig. 5B). Cheliceral promargin with three teeth, retromargin with two (Fig. 5E). Sternum rounded, rebordered (Fig. 5D). Tarsi without scopulae. Opisthosoma sub-oval, with short black setae (Fig. 5A). Body length 10.83. Carapace 4.17 long, 5.09 wide. Opisthosoma 6.66 long, 5.56 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: ALE 0.11, AME 0.23, PLE 0.39, PME 0.27; ALE–ALE 1.73, AME–ALE 0.53, AME–AME 0.21, PLE–PLE 2.07, PME–PLE 0.87, PME–PME 0.88. Clypeus height at AMEs 0.13, at ALEs 0.26. Length of chelicerae 1.37. Length of palp and legs: palp 4.24 [1.32, 0.80, 0.84, 1.28], I 15.33 [4.74, 1.96, 3.83, 3.37, 1.43], II 17.57 [5.72, 2.14, 4.57, 3.68, 1.46], III 14.43 [4.94, 1.56, 3.78, 2.98, 1.17], IV 16.84 [5.80, 1.72, 4.38, 3.50, 1.44]. Leg formula: 2413. Spination of palp: femur pld 1 do 5 rld 1 rlv 1, patella pld 1 do 2, tibia pl 1 pld 2 do 2 rl 1, tarsus pl 4 pld 2 plv 1 do 3 rl 3 rld 2 rlv 2 v 1; legs: femur I pl 2 do 3, II–IV do 3, patellae I–IV 0; tibiae I–II plv 3 rlv 3, III 0, IV plv 1; metatarsi I–II plv 2 rlv 2, III–IV 0; tarsi I–IV 0.</p> <p>Genitalia (Figs 5F–H, 6A–C): epigyne with a deep posteromedian excavation (Figs 5F–G, 6A), with longitudinally oriented, arc-like epigynal pockets with sclerotised prolateral rims (Figs 5F–G, 6A; EP). Copulatory openings wide, semi-circular, transversely oriented, with sclerotised prolateral rims (Figs 5F–G, 6A; CO), enclosing a broad, transversely oriented, membranous epigynal median field with M-shaped anterior margin (Figs 5F–G, 6A; MF). Copulatory ducts unspiralled, with broad, flat proximal and transversely oriented, long, narrow, tubular distal parts (Figs 5H, 6C; CD). Spermathecae globular, proximal part with 3–4 turns (Figs 5H, 6C; S). Copulatory ducts, spermathecae and fertilization ducts entirely covered by hyaline uterus externus with broad, median, cup-shaped invagination (Figs 5H, 6B; UE, arrow). Fertilization ducts flat, diverging (Fig. 6C; FD).</p> <p>Male. For redescription and illustrations of the male, see Sankaran et al. (2020).</p> <p>Note. There seems discrepancy in the terminologies used by various authors to denote different structures of the female genitalia of Makdiops and Siamspinops and possibly of other selenopid genera. For example, Dankittipakul &amp; Corronca (2009) used the term ‘secondary epigynal pocket’ to denote the posteromedially located, paired epigynal invaginations found in Makdiops and Siamspinops (Dankittipakul &amp; Corronca 2009: fig. 27). The usage of ‘secondary epigynal pocket’ is confusing as these authors did not indicate the occurrence of ‘primary epigynal pocket’ in the female genitalia. Crews &amp; Harvey (2011: fig. 81) and Yu et al. (2019: fig. 4) used the term ‘epigynal pocket’ to represent these invaginations. Dankittipakul &amp; Corronca (2009) used the term ‘uterus externus’ to denote the hyaline membranous covering, but Crews &amp; Harvey (2011: fig. 82) and Yu et al. (2019: fig. 5) used ‘posterodorsal fold’ or ‘posterodorsal epigynal fold’ to denote it. In fact, the sclerotised ‘posterodorsal fold’ can only be seen in the caudal view of the epigyne, whereas the hyaline ‘uterus externus’ can be visible ventrally and is always connected with the fertilization ducts. Some of the structures of the female genitalia of Siamspinops are found incorrectly named in previous works. For example, Dankittipakul &amp; Corronca (2009: fig. 30) considered the entire spiralled structure of the genitalia as the spermathecae. However, Yu et al. (2019: fig. 5) considered it as the copulatory ducts. The latter authors considered the anterior most turn of the copulatory ducts as the spermathecae, which was considered as the spermathecal head by the former authors. The spermathecae in Siamspinops could be the turn of the copulatory ducts that may be anterior or posterior, to which the fertilization ducts always found attached as shown in Fig. 4E. In fact, Dankittipakul &amp; Corronca (2009: fig. 30) misidentified the spermathecae as the spermathecal head. The structure labelled as the accessory lobe of the spermathecae in Dankittipakul &amp; Corronca (2009: fig. 35) corresponds to the accessory bulb of the spermathecae as shown in Figs 4D–E.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C56D8781982FA514FF02FF33910EFCF1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Kadam, Gautam;Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu;Tripathi, Rishikesh	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Kadam, Gautam, Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu, Tripathi, Rishikesh (2022): First record of Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca, 2009 from India, first description of the female of Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931), and a catalogue of Indian selenopid fauna (Araneae, Selenopidae). Zootaxa 5194 (1): 109-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.6
C56D87819820A515FF02F9CA901BF829.text	C56D87819820A515FF02F9CA901BF829.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Makdiops agumbensis (Tikader 1969)	<div><p>Makdiops agumbensis (Tikader, 1969)</p> <p>Selenops agumbensis Tikader, 1969: 252, figs 1–3 (♀).</p> <p>Makdiops agumbensis (Tikader). Crews &amp; Harvey 2011: 87; Sankaran et al. 2020: 596, figs 1A–C (♀).</p> <p>Type locality. Agumbe Ghat, Karnataka, India (Tikader 1969).</p> <p>Type repository. NZC-ZSI (Sankaran et al. 2020).</p> <p>Records from India. Karnataka (Tikader 1969; Fig. 7).</p> <p>Distribution. Known only from India (World Spider Catalog 2022).</p> <p>Remarks. Crews &amp; Harvey (2011) transferred this species from Selenops to Makdiops based on original textual description. Sankaran et al. (2020) redescribed and illustrated the holotype female.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C56D87819820A515FF02F9CA901BF829	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Kadam, Gautam;Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu;Tripathi, Rishikesh	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Kadam, Gautam, Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu, Tripathi, Rishikesh (2022): First record of Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca, 2009 from India, first description of the female of Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931), and a catalogue of Indian selenopid fauna (Araneae, Selenopidae). Zootaxa 5194 (1): 109-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.6
C56D87819820A515FF02FAEB9654FA1D.text	C56D87819820A515FF02FAEB9654FA1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Selenopidae Simon 1897	<div><p>Catalogue of Selenopidae in India</p> <p>Following this study, the Selenopidae in India now comprises eight species in three genera; all are described/ recorded from mainland India. There are six species of Makdiops, of which four are known only from females (World Spider Catalog 2022; present data).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C56D87819820A515FF02FAEB9654FA1D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Kadam, Gautam;Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu;Tripathi, Rishikesh	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Kadam, Gautam, Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu, Tripathi, Rishikesh (2022): First record of Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca, 2009 from India, first description of the female of Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931), and a catalogue of Indian selenopid fauna (Araneae, Selenopidae). Zootaxa 5194 (1): 109-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.6
C56D87819823A516FF02FF7A97E9FE24.text	C56D87819823A516FF02FF7A97E9FE24.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Makdiops mahishasura Crews & Harvey 2011	<div><p>Makdiops mahishasura Crews &amp; Harvey, 2011</p> <p>Makdiops mahishasura Crews &amp; Harvey, 2011: 88, figs 85–86 (♀).</p> <p>Type locality. Two miles northwest of Punjur, Karnataka, India (Crews &amp; Harvey 2011).</p> <p>Type repository. CAS (Crews &amp; Harvey 2011).</p> <p>Records from India. Karnataka (Crews &amp; Harvey 2011; Fig. 7).</p> <p>Distribution. Known only from India (World Spider Catalog 2022).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C56D87819823A516FF02FF7A97E9FE24	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Kadam, Gautam;Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu;Tripathi, Rishikesh	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Kadam, Gautam, Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu, Tripathi, Rishikesh (2022): First record of Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca, 2009 from India, first description of the female of Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931), and a catalogue of Indian selenopid fauna (Araneae, Selenopidae). Zootaxa 5194 (1): 109-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.6
C56D87819823A516FF02FE369154FC2C.text	C56D87819823A516FF02FE369154FC2C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Makdiops montigena (Simon 1889)	<div><p>Makdiops montigena (Simon, 1889)</p> <p>Selenops montigena Simon, 1889: 335 (♀). Gravely 1931: 260, fig. 15D (♀).</p> <p>Makdiops montigenus (Simon). Crews &amp; Harvey 2011: 84, figs 81–84, 112 (♂ ♀).</p> <p>Makdiops montigena (Simon). Sankaran et al. 2020: 597, figs 2A–B, D (♀).</p> <p>Type locality. Jaunsar-Bawar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India (Sankaran et al. 2020).</p> <p>Type repository. NZC-ZSI (Sankaran et al. 2020).</p> <p>Records from India. Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand (Crews &amp; Harvey 2011; Sankaran et al. 2020; Fig. 7).</p> <p>Distribution. India, Nepal (World Spider Catalog 2022).</p> <p>Remarks. Crews &amp; Harvey (2011) transferred this species from Selenops to Makdiops based on non-type material collected from India and Nepal. Sankaran et al. (2020) redescribed and illustrated the holotype female.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C56D87819823A516FF02FE369154FC2C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Kadam, Gautam;Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu;Tripathi, Rishikesh	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Kadam, Gautam, Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu, Tripathi, Rishikesh (2022): First record of Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca, 2009 from India, first description of the female of Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931), and a catalogue of Indian selenopid fauna (Araneae, Selenopidae). Zootaxa 5194 (1): 109-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.6
C56D87819823A516FF02FC3E91B0FAA0.text	C56D87819823A516FF02FC3E91B0FAA0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Makdiops nilgirensis (Reimoser 1934)	<div><p>Makdiops nilgirensis (Reimoser, 1934)</p> <p>Selenops nilgirensis Reimoser, 1934: 486, fig. 10 (♀).</p> <p>Makdiops nilgirensis (Reimoser). Crews &amp; Harvey 2011: 89, figs 87–88, 113 (♀).</p> <p>Type locality. Karteri Valley, Tamil Nadu, India (Reimoser 1934; Crews &amp; Harvey 2011).</p> <p>Type repository. MHNG (Crews &amp; Harvey 2011).</p> <p>Records from India. Tamil Nadu (Reimoser 1934; Crews &amp; Harvey 2011; Fig. 7).</p> <p>Distribution. Known only from India (World Spider Catalog 2022).</p> <p>Remarks. Crews &amp; Harvey (2011) transferred this species from Selenops to Makdiops based on type material.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C56D87819823A516FF02FC3E91B0FAA0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Kadam, Gautam;Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu;Tripathi, Rishikesh	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Kadam, Gautam, Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu, Tripathi, Rishikesh (2022): First record of Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca, 2009 from India, first description of the female of Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931), and a catalogue of Indian selenopid fauna (Araneae, Selenopidae). Zootaxa 5194 (1): 109-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.6
C56D87819823A516FF02FAB295EDF911.text	C56D87819823A516FF02FAB295EDF911.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely 1931)	<div><p>Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931)</p> <p>Selenops shevaroyensis Gravely, 1931: 259, fig. 15C (♂).</p> <p>Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely). Sankaran et al. 2020: 598, figs 3A–C, 4A–D (♂).</p> <p>Type locality. Servarayan Hills, Yercaud, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India (Gravely 1931; Sankaran et al. 2020).</p> <p>Type repository. NZC-ZSI (Sankaran et al. 2020).</p> <p>Records from India. Tamil Nadu (Gravely 1931; Sankaran et al. 2020; Fig. 7).</p> <p>Distribution. Known only from India (World Spider Catalog 2022).</p> <p>Remarks. Sankaran et al. (2020) redescribed and illustrated the holotype male of S. shevaroyensis and transferred it to Makdiops.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C56D87819823A516FF02FAB295EDF911	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Kadam, Gautam;Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu;Tripathi, Rishikesh	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Kadam, Gautam, Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu, Tripathi, Rishikesh (2022): First record of Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca, 2009 from India, first description of the female of Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931), and a catalogue of Indian selenopid fauna (Araneae, Selenopidae). Zootaxa 5194 (1): 109-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.6
C56D87819823A517FF02F8E29170FF79.text	C56D87819823A517FF02F8E29170FF79.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Makdiops shiva Crews & Harvey 2011	<div><p>Makdiops shiva Crews &amp; Harvey, 2011</p> <p>Makdiops shiva Crews &amp; Harvey, 2011: 90, figs 89–90 (♀). Sankaran et al. 2020: 597.</p> <p>Type locality. Bhimashankar, Maharashtra, India (Crews &amp; Harvey 2011).</p> <p>Type repository. CAS (Crews &amp; Harvey 2011).</p> <p>Records from India. Maharashtra (Crews &amp; Harvey 2011; Fig. 7).</p> <p>Distribution. Known only from India (World Spider Catalog 2022).</p> <p>Remarks. According to Sankaran et al. (2020), this species may be a junior synonym of M. agumbensis.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C56D87819823A517FF02F8E29170FF79	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Kadam, Gautam;Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu;Tripathi, Rishikesh	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Kadam, Gautam, Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu, Tripathi, Rishikesh (2022): First record of Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca, 2009 from India, first description of the female of Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931), and a catalogue of Indian selenopid fauna (Araneae, Selenopidae). Zootaxa 5194 (1): 109-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.6
C56D87819822A517FF02FE8A9566FD45.text	C56D87819822A517FF02FE8A9566FD45.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Selenops radiatus Latreille 1819	<div><p>Selenops radiatus Latreille, 1819</p> <p>Selenops radiatus Latreille, 1819: vol. 30, p. 580. For complete synonymy list, see World Spider Catalog (2022).</p> <p>Type locality. Unknown.</p> <p>Type repository. Unknown.</p> <p>Records from India. Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Gujarat, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal (Pocock 1900; Gravely 1931; Patel &amp; Patel 1973; Fig. 8).</p> <p>Distribution. Africa, China, India, Mediterranean, Middle East, Myanmar (World Spider Catalog 2022).</p> <p>Remarks. Pocock (1900) recorded this species for the first time from India. Patel &amp; Patel (1973) misidentified and described it as Selenops sumitrae Patel &amp; Patel, 1973, which was later synonymised with S. radiatus (Zamani &amp; Crews 2019).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C56D87819822A517FF02FE8A9566FD45	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Kadam, Gautam;Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu;Tripathi, Rishikesh	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Kadam, Gautam, Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu, Tripathi, Rishikesh (2022): First record of Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca, 2009 from India, first description of the female of Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931), and a catalogue of Indian selenopid fauna (Araneae, Selenopidae). Zootaxa 5194 (1): 109-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.6
C56D87819822A517FF02FC9796FFFBE5.text	C56D87819822A517FF02FC9796FFFBE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Siamspinops garoensis Kadam, Tripathi & Sankaran 2022	<div><p>Siamspinops garoensis Kadam, Tripathi &amp; Sankaran, 2022 sp. nov.</p> <p>Type locality. Resu Haluapara, North Garo Hills, Meghalaya, India.</p> <p>Type repository. ZSI/ WGRC.</p> <p>Records from India. Meghalaya.</p> <p>Distribution. Known only from India (Fig. 8).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C56D87819822A517FF02FC9796FFFBE5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.;Kadam, Gautam;Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu;Tripathi, Rishikesh	Sankaran, Pradeep M., Kadam, Gautam, Sudhikumar, Ambalaparambil Vasu, Tripathi, Rishikesh (2022): First record of Siamspinops Dankittipakul & Corronca, 2009 from India, first description of the female of Makdiops shevaroyensis (Gravely, 1931), and a catalogue of Indian selenopid fauna (Araneae, Selenopidae). Zootaxa 5194 (1): 109-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.6
