identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
D004FE1CA06CB40CF988FB0B2EE1FEF4.text	D004FE1CA06CB40CF988FB0B2EE1FEF4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fonsecaiulus youngi Felix & Mejdalani & Domahovski & Cavichioli 2022	<div><p>Fonsecaiulus youngi sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 1–8)</p> <p>Etymology. This species is named in honor of the late Prof. Dr. David A. Young (1915–1991), who published three impressive monographs on the Cicadellinae (1968, 1977, 1986). Fonsecaiulus was described in the 1977 monograph.</p> <p>Total length (mm). Male holotype 6.13.</p> <p>Color (Figs 1–3). Dorsum brown with three longitudinal yellow stripes extending from anterior margin of crown to apex of clavus; median stripe narrowed posteriorly from median portion of pronotum, continuing as narrow line along commissural margins; lateral stripes strongly narrowed on median portion of clavus. Corium with irregular yellow stripe extending from anterior portion of brachial cell to inner anteapical cell, strongly narrowed along anterior third; very narrow yellow stripe extending longitudinally near costal margin, posteriorly connected to yellow macula on median and outer anteapical cells.</p> <p>Male terminalia. Pygofer (Fig. 4), in lateral view, well produced posteriorly; posterior margin subtriangular; without processes; macrosetae of distinct sizes on posterior portion and extending anteriorly over ventral portion. Valve (Fig. 5), in ventral view, short and broad, subrectangular; anterior margin slightly concave. Subgenital plate (Figs 4, 5), in ventral view, broad at basal two-thirds and narrow at apical third, these areas not separated by constriction; plate fused at base to its counterpart; without macrosetae; in dorsal view, with two tiny dentiform processes at apical portion of basal two-thirds, not located close to each other, anterior process associated with style apex; in lateral view, plate not extending as far posteriorly as pygofer apex. Connective (Fig. 6), in dorsal view, short, Y-shaped; stalk with median keel. Style (Fig. 6), in dorsal view, extending farther posteriorly than connective; apophysis with preapical, slight angulate lobe; portion behind lobe narrowed, bearing setae; apex slightly expanded, truncate. Aedeagus (Figs 7, 8) symmetrical; shaft, in lateral view, curved dorsally and tall; dorsal margin with elongate preapical spine directed posteriorly; apex acute; in ventral view, shaft flattened for most of its length, slightly expanded apically, apical portion with fusiform crown of spines; gonopore located ventroapically. Paraphyses (Figs 7, 8), in lateral view, with pair of sinuous acute rami, extending as far posteriorly as aedeagal apex.</p> <p>Female unknown.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: male, “ Brasil, Minas Gerais, \ PN [Parque Nacional] da Serra do Cipó 9– \ 13.XII.2011 (Malaise) \ <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-43.60083&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-19.37139" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -43.60083/lat -19.37139)">Santana do Riacho</a>, \ Córrego das Pedras”; “ 19°22′17″S \ 43°36′03″W 766m \ Monné, M.L.; Santos, \ A.; Takiya, D.M. &amp; \ Cavichioli, R.R.” (DZUP).</p> <p>Remarks. Fonsecaiulus youngi sp. nov. can be distinguished from the remaining species of the genus by the aedeagus, in lateral view, with an elongate preapical spine directed posteriorly (Fig. 7) and, in ventral view, with a fusiform crown of spines (Fig. 8). The paraphyses in this new species have a pair of sinuous acute rami that extend as far posteriorly as the aedeagal apex (Figs 7, 8) and the subgenital plates are narrowed at the apical third (Fig. 5).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D004FE1CA06CB40CF988FB0B2EE1FEF4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Felix, Márcio;Mejdalani, Gabriel;Domahovski, Alexandre C.;Cavichioli, Rodney R.	Felix, Márcio, Mejdalani, Gabriel, Domahovski, Alexandre C., Cavichioli, Rodney R. (2022): Eight new Brazilian species of Fonsecaiulus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini) new records of species, and key to males of the genus. Zootaxa 5195 (2): 101-124, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.2.1
D004FE1CA06EB40BF988FEEA2AF2FE8C.text	D004FE1CA06EB40BF988FEEA2AF2FE8C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fonsecaiulus spinosus Felix & Mejdalani & Domahovski & Cavichioli 2022	<div><p>Fonsecaiulus spinosus sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 9–26)</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet, spinosus, refers to the dorsal row of spines and crown of apical spines on the aedeagal shaft (Figs 15, 16).</p> <p>Total length (mm). Male holotype 5.75; male paratype 5.81; female paratype 6.13.</p> <p>Color (Figs 9–11). Dorsum brown with three longitudinal yellow stripes extending from anterior margin of crown to apex of clavus; median stripe narrowed posteriorly from median portion of pronotum, continuing as narrow line along commissural margins; lateral stripes strongly narrowed on median portion of clavus. Corium with irregular yellow stripe extending from anterior portion of brachial cell to inner anteapical cell, strongly narrowed along anterior third; very narrow yellow stripe extending longitudinally near costal margin, posteriorly connected to yellow macula on median and outer anteapical cells.</p> <p>Male terminalia. Pygofer (Fig. 12), in lateral view, moderately produced posteriorly; posterior margin subtriangular; without processes; macrosetae of distinct sizes on posterior portion and extending anteriorly over ventral portion. Valve (Fig. 13), in ventral view, short and broad, with distinct median constriction. Subgenital plate (Figs 12, 13), in ventral view, broad at basal third and narrow at apical two-thirds, these areas separated by slight constriction; plate fused at base to its counterpart; without macrosetae; in dorsal view, with three tiny dentiform processes at apical portion of basal third, located close to one another, anterior process associated with style apex; in lateral view, plate not extending as far posteriorly as pygofer apex. Connective (Fig. 14), in dorsal view, short and broad, with posterior margin deeply notched, without stalk. Style (Fig. 14), in dorsal view, elongate, extending much farther posteriorly than connective; apophysis with preapical, slight angulate lobe; portion behind lobe strongly narrowed, bearing setae; apex subtruncate. Aedeagus (Figs 15, 16) symmetrical; shaft, in lateral view, curved dorsally and very tall; dorsal margin with row of spines that are larger toward apex (last spine much larger than previous ones and with apex curved anteriorly); apex broad; in ventral view, shaft flattened and with crown of apical spines; gonopore located ventroapically. Paraphyses (Figs 15, 16) with membranous base; in lateral view, rami robust, directed dorsally, and with obtuse apex.</p> <p>Female terminalia. Sternite VII (Figs 17–19), in ventral view, subtriangularly produced posterolaterally; posterior margin with moderately produced median lobe. “Internal” sternite VIII without distinct sclerites. Pygofer (Figs 17, 18), in lateral view, moderately produced posteriorly; apex narrowly rounded; surface with row of sparse macrosetae along ventroapical margin and a few grouped near apex. First valvifer (Figs 20, 21), in lateral view, somewhat elliptical; anterior portion with rigidly attached, sclerotized bifurcated structure associated with first valvula (indicated by an arrow in Fig. 20 and magnified in Fig. 21); surface of this structure distinctly covered by denticuli. First valvula (Figs 20, 22), in lateral view, with basal portion enlarged and subrectangular; basal margin truncate and oblique in ventral view; dorsal sculptured area extending from basal portion to apex of blade, formed mostly by scalelike processes arranged in oblique lines, except basally with more linear processes; ventral sculptured area restricted to apical portion of blade, formed by scalelike processes; blade apex acute. Second valvula (Figs 23–25), in lateral view, broadened beyond basal curvature, narrowing slightly toward narrowly rounded apex; ventral margin approximately rectilinear; preapical prominence distinct, obtuse; dorsal margin with approximately 20 mostly triangular continuous teeth, extending from expanded basal portion to apical portion of blade; most teeth with steep, short ascending portion, and gradually declivous, long descending portion; denticles distributed on teeth and on apical portion of blade, except on apex; ventral dentate apical portion distinctly longer than dorsal portion; blade with ducts attaining teeth or terminating below them, also extending to apex. Gonoplac (Fig. 26) of the usual Cicadellinae type: in lateral view, with basal half distinctly narrow, abruptly expanded on median portion; ventral margin slightly concave on median third; apex narrowly rounded.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: male, “ Brasil, Minas Gerais, \ São Roque P. N. [Parque Nacional] Serra \ da Canastra \ 14–19.xii.2013 Malaise \ Melo &amp; Rosa legs.” (DZUP). Paratypes: two males and one female, same data as the holotype (DZUP).</p> <p>Remarks. Fonsecaiulus spinosus sp. nov. has a quite peculiar aedeagus (Fig. 15), which will readily distinguish it from the other known species of the genus. The aedeagal shaft, in lateral view, has a row of dorsal spines that become larger toward the apex, the last spine being much larger than the previous ones (Fig. 15). The paraphyses rami are robust and obtuse apically (Fig. 15). In the female terminalia, a peculiar bifurcate structure was observed in association with the first valvifer and valvula (Figs 20, 21). This kind of structure was also observed in F. unciformis sp. nov. (Figs 54, 55).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D004FE1CA06EB40BF988FEEA2AF2FE8C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Felix, Márcio;Mejdalani, Gabriel;Domahovski, Alexandre C.;Cavichioli, Rodney R.	Felix, Márcio, Mejdalani, Gabriel, Domahovski, Alexandre C., Cavichioli, Rodney R. (2022): Eight new Brazilian species of Fonsecaiulus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini) new records of species, and key to males of the genus. Zootaxa 5195 (2): 101-124, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.2.1
D004FE1CA06BB408F988FF1A2FAAFBDC.text	D004FE1CA06BB408F988FF1A2FAAFBDC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fonsecaiulus longiramus Felix & Mejdalani & Domahovski & Cavichioli 2022	<div><p>Fonsecaiulus longiramus sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 27–34)</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet, longiramus, refers to the very long paraphyses rami (Fig. 33).</p> <p>Total length (mm). Male holotype 5.44.</p> <p>Color (Figs 27–29). Dorsum brown with three longitudinal yellow stripes extending from anterior margin of crown to apex of clavus; median stripe narrowed posteriorly from median portion of pronotum, continuing as narrow line along commissural margins; lateral stripes strongly narrowed on median portion of clavus. Corium with irregular yellow stripe extending from anterior portion of brachial cell to inner anteapical cell, strongly narrowed along anterior third; very narrow yellow stripe extending longitudinally near costal margin, posteriorly connected to yellow macula on median and outer anteapical cells.</p> <p>Male terminalia. Pygofer (Fig. 30), in lateral view, strongly produced posteriorly; posterior margin subtriangular; without processes; sparse macrosetae of distinct sizes on posterior portion and extending anteriorly over ventral portion. Valve (Fig. 31), in ventral view, short and broad, subrectangular; anterior margin slightly concave medially. Subgenital plate (Figs 30, 31), in ventral view, subtriangular, broad at basal half and narrow at apical half, outer margin rounded at basal half; plate fused to its counterpart along basal third; without macrosetae; in dorsal view, with two tiny dentiform processes at apical portion of basal half, not located close to each other, anterior process associated with style apex; in lateral view, plate not extending as far posteriorly as pygofer apex. Connective (Fig. 32), in dorsal view, without stalk, forming transverse bar, with median keel. Style (Fig. 32), in dorsal view, elongate, extending much farther posteriorly than connective; apophysis with inconspicuous preapical lobe; portion behind lobe distinctly narrowed, bearing setae; apex truncate, foot-shaped. Aedeagus (Figs 33, 34) symmetrical; shaft, in lateral view, elongate, subcylindrical, strongly curved dorsally, with acute apex; without processes; gonopore located ventrally at apical third. Paraphyses (Figs 33, 34), in lateral view, with rami very elongate, extending almost as far posteriorly as pygofer apex, each one with apical portion curved ventrally and expanded, apex truncate and with pair of lateral small spines; in ventral view, basal half of each ramus with slender process directed medially.</p> <p>Female unknown.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: male, “ BRASIL Maranhão, Mirador \ Parque Estadual Mirador \ Base de Geraldina \ 063726S–455209W \ 28–30.ix.2006, J.A. Rafael &amp; \ F.L. Oliveira, Varredura” (DZUP).</p> <p>Remarks. In F. longiramus sp. nov., the paraphyses rami are extremely elongate with expanded apices (Figs 33, 34), two conditions that will easily distinguish it from the remaining known species of the genus. The pygofer is also strongly produced, extending posteriorly much farther than the subgenital plates (Fig. 30).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D004FE1CA06BB408F988FF1A2FAAFBDC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Felix, Márcio;Mejdalani, Gabriel;Domahovski, Alexandre C.;Cavichioli, Rodney R.	Felix, Márcio, Mejdalani, Gabriel, Domahovski, Alexandre C., Cavichioli, Rodney R. (2022): Eight new Brazilian species of Fonsecaiulus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini) new records of species, and key to males of the genus. Zootaxa 5195 (2): 101-124, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.2.1
D004FE1CA06AB407F988FB0B2881FE38.text	D004FE1CA06AB407F988FB0B2881FE38.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fonsecaiulus alvarengai Felix & Mejdalani & Domahovski & Cavichioli 2022	<div><p>Fonsecaiulus alvarengai sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 35–42)</p> <p>Etymology. This species is named in honor of the late Air Force Officer Moacyr Alvarenga (1915–2010), who was a gifted collector of insects and thus contributed greatly to the development of Brazilian entomology. He was the collector of the type series of this new species.</p> <p>Total length (mm). Male holotype 5.44; male paratype 5.50.</p> <p>Color (Figs 35–37). Dorsum brown with three longitudinal pale yellow stripes extending from anterior margin of crown to mesonotum; median stripe narrowed posteriorly from median portion of pronotum, continuing as narrow line along commissural margins; lateral stripes very narrow; veins of clavus and claval sulcus pale yellow. Corium with some longitudinal veins partially pale yellow.</p> <p>Male terminalia. Pygofer (Fig. 38), in lateral view, moderately produced posteriorly; posterior margin broadly rounded; without processes; macrosetae of distinct sizes distributed mostly on distal half of disk. Valve (Fig. 39), in ventral view, short and broad, subrectangular; anterior margin concave; posterior margin broadly concave. Subgenital plate (Figs 38, 39), in ventral view, subtriangular; outer margin rounded at basal half; plate fused along basal three-fifths to its counterpart; without macrosetae; in dorsal view, with two tiny dentiform processes at apical portion of basal half, not located close to each other, anterior process associated with style apex; in lateral view, plate not extending as far posteriorly as pygofer apex. Connective (Fig. 40), in dorsal view, forming transverse bar, without stalk, slightly curved posteriorly, with dorsal median keel. Style (Fig. 40), in dorsal view, extending farther posteriorly than connective; apophysis with slight, rounded preapical lobe; portion behind lobe strongly narrowed, bearing setae; apex acute. Aedeagus (Figs 41, 42) symmetrical; shaft, in lateral view, tubular, expanded apically, directed dorsally; basiventral area with pair of elongate acute processes, extending farther posteriorly than aedeagal shaft; gonopore located preapically at ventral margin. Paraphyses absent.</p> <p>Female unknown.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: male, “ BRAZIL: \ M. Alvarenga \ B.M. 1971-165.” (DZUP). Paratypes: two males, same data as the holotype (DZUP).</p> <p>Remarks. Fonsecaiulus alvarengai sp. nov., which unfortunately is currently known from three males with only “ Brazil ” as locality information, is one of three of our new species that have no paraphyses; the other two are F. takiyae sp. nov. and F. truncatus sp. nov. (see descriptions and remarks below). The absence of paraphyses is a condition that was not mentioned by Young (1977) in the original description of the genus, and the three new species described by Felix et al. (2015) have these structures. In addition to the absence of paraphyses, F. alvarengai can be recognized by the apically expanded aedeagus, which bears at base a pair of elongate acute processes (Figs 41, 42). The outer margin of the subgenital plate is rounded at the basal half (Fig. 39).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D004FE1CA06AB407F988FB0B2881FE38	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Felix, Márcio;Mejdalani, Gabriel;Domahovski, Alexandre C.;Cavichioli, Rodney R.	Felix, Márcio, Mejdalani, Gabriel, Domahovski, Alexandre C., Cavichioli, Rodney R. (2022): Eight new Brazilian species of Fonsecaiulus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini) new records of species, and key to males of the genus. Zootaxa 5195 (2): 101-124, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.2.1
D004FE1CA064B404F988FF1A29A8FA90.text	D004FE1CA064B404F988FF1A29A8FA90.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fonsecaiulus unciformis Felix & Mejdalani & Domahovski & Cavichioli 2022	<div><p>Fonsecaiulus unciformis sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 43–60)</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet, unciformis, refers to the hook-shaped apical portion of the paraphyses rami in lateral view (Fig. 49).</p> <p>Total length (mm). Male holotype 5.63; female paratype 5.69.</p> <p>Color (Figs 43–45). Dorsum brown with three longitudinal yellow stripes extending from anterior margin of crown to apex of clavus; median stripe narrowed posteriorly from median portion of pronotum, continuing as narrow line along commissural margins; lateral stripes strongly narrowed on median portion of clavus. Corium with irregular yellow stripe extending from anterior portion of brachial cell to inner anteapical cell, strongly narrowed along anterior third; very narrow yellow stripe extending longitudinally near costal margin, posteriorly connected to yellow macula on median and outer anteapical cells.</p> <p>Male terminalia. Pygofer (Fig. 46), in lateral view, moderately produced posteriorly; posterior margin broadly rounded; without processes; sparse macrosetae of distinct sizes distributed mostly on posterior portion and extending anteriorly over ventral portion. Valve (Fig. 47), in ventral view, short and broad, subrectangular; anterior margin concave. Subgenital plate (Figs 46, 47), in ventral view, with basal half broad and apical half narrow, outer margin rounded at basal half; plate fused along basal third to its counterpart; without macrosetae; in dorsal view, with two tiny dentiform processes at apical portion of basal half, not located close to each other, anterior process associated with style apex; in lateral view, plate not extending as far posteriorly as pygofer apex. Connective (Fig. 48), in dorsal view, subquadrate, without stalk, with slight median keel. Style (Fig. 48), in dorsal view, extending farther posteriorly than connective; apophysis without preapical lobe; apical portion strongly narrowed, bearing setae; apex truncate, foot-shaped. Aedeagus (Figs 49, 50) symmetrical; shaft, in lateral view, elongate, subcylindrical, curved dorsally, with acute apex; without processes; gonopore located ventrally at apical third. Paraphyses (Figs 49, 50), in lateral view, with elongate rami, each one with ventral subquadrate lobe at median portion and with apex curved ventrally, hook-shaped.</p> <p>Female terminalia. Sternite VII (Figs 51–53), in ventral view, with posterior margin trilobed; median lobe broad, subquadrate. “Internal” sternite VIII without distinct sclerites. First valvifer (Figs 54, 55), in lateral view, somewhat trapezoidal; anterior portion with sclerotized bifurcated structure with short dorsal and long ventral branch associated with first valvula (indicated by an arrow in Fig. 54 and magnified in Fig. 55); surface of this structure distinctly covered by tegumentary processes. First valvula (Figs 54, 56), second valvula (Figs 57–59), and gonoplac (Fig. 60) much as described for F. spinosus sp. nov. Second valvula with about 22 teeth.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: male, “ Brasil, Minas Gerais, \ São Roque P. N. [Parque Nacional] Serra \ da Canastra \ 14–19.xii.2013 Malaise \ Melo &amp; Rosa legs.” (DZUP). Paratypes: one female, same data as the holotype (DZUP); one female, “BRA [Brazil], MG [Minas Gerais], Serra do Salitre, \ RPPN [Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural] <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-46.567192&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-19.162695" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -46.567192/lat -19.162695)">Cachoeira do Campo</a> \ (19º09′45,7”S / 46º34′01,9”W, \ alt. 1063m) 11–15.X.2012 \ Lima &amp; Kumagai col.” (DZUP).</p> <p>Remarks. Males of F. unciformis sp. nov. can be recognized by the subquadrate lobe at the median portion and the hook-shaped apex of the paraphyses rami (Figs 49, 50). In females, the posterior margin of the sternite VII is characteristically trilobed (Fig. 53) and, as aforementioned, a peculiar bifurcate structure is associated with the first valvifer and valvula of the ovipositor (Figs 54, 55).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D004FE1CA064B404F988FF1A29A8FA90	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Felix, Márcio;Mejdalani, Gabriel;Domahovski, Alexandre C.;Cavichioli, Rodney R.	Felix, Márcio, Mejdalani, Gabriel, Domahovski, Alexandre C., Cavichioli, Rodney R. (2022): Eight new Brazilian species of Fonsecaiulus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini) new records of species, and key to males of the genus. Zootaxa 5195 (2): 101-124, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.2.1
D004FE1CA066B401F988FA322FC1FCD0.text	D004FE1CA066B401F988FA322FC1FCD0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fonsecaiulus chelatus Felix & Mejdalani & Domahovski & Cavichioli 2022	<div><p>Fonsecaiulus chelatus sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 61–78)</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet, chelatus, refers to the shape of the apical portion of the paraphyses rami in lateral view (Fig. 67).</p> <p>Total length (mm). Male holotype 5.50; male paratypes 5.50–5.95 (n = 3); female paratypes 5.56–6.06 (n = 3).</p> <p>Color (Figs 61–63). Dorsum dark brown with three longitudinal yellow stripes; median stripe extending from anterior margin of crown to transverse sulcus of mesonotum, narrowed posteriorly from anterior margin of pronotum; lateral stripes extending from anterior margin of crown to about two-thirds of clavus. Corium with longitudinal yellow stripe parallel to claval sulcus, extending from apical portion of lateral stripe to inner anteapical cell; yellow spot on outer anteapical cell.</p> <p>Male terminalia. Pygofer (Fig. 64), in lateral view, moderately produced posteriorly; posterior margin narrowly rounded; posteroventral margin forming pair of small, inner dentiform processes; macrosetae of distinct sizes distributed mostly on posterior portion and extending anteriorly over ventral portion. Valve (Fig. 65), in ventral view, short and broad, subrectangular; anterior margin slightly concave. Subgenital plate (Figs 64, 65), in ventral view, broad at basal third and narrow at apical two-thirds, outer margin rounded at basal third; plate fused at base to its counterpart; without macrosetae; in dorsal view, with two tiny dentiform processes at apical portion of basal third, not located close to each other, anterior process associated with style lobe and posterior process associated with style apex; in lateral view, plate elongate, extending posteriorly for about three-fourths of pygofer length. Connective (Fig. 66), in dorsal view, subquadrate, stalk small and broad, with slight median keel. Style (Fig. 66), in dorsal view, short but extending farther posteriorly than connective; apophysis with inconspicuous preapical lobe; portion behind lobe strongly narrowed, bearing setae; apex truncate. Aedeagus (Figs 67–68) symmetrical; shaft, in lateral view, elongate, curved posterodorsally, base tall, apical third tapered; gonopore located ventrally at apical third. Paraphyses (Figs 67–68), in lateral view, with distinct stalk; rami tall, elongate, attaining median portion of aedeagus, their distal portion with two acute processes, one directed dorsally and another posteriorly; in ventral view, rami divergent at apical half.</p> <p>Female terminalia. Sternite VII (Figs 69–71), in ventral view, with posterior margin simple, distinctly emarginate in unmacerated specimens and more broadly rounded in macerated ones. “Internal” sternite VIII, in dorsal view, with sclerotized areas, including conspicuous semilunar sclerite (indicated by an arrow in Fig. 73). First valvifer (Fig. 72), in lateral view, somewhat elliptical. First valvula (Figs 72, 74), second valvula (Figs 75–77), and gonoplac (Fig. 78) much as described for F. spinosus sp. nov. Second valvula with about 25 teeth.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: male, “ Brasil, PR [Paraná], Antonina, \ R.P.P.N. [Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural] <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-48.696&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-25.316" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -48.696/lat -25.316)">Guaricica</a>, \ 25.316°S 48.696°W \ 15–19.IV.2019, Sweep \ Entomologia—UFPR” (DZUP). Paratypes: three males and four females, same data as the holotype (DZUP); one male and two females, same data as the holotype, except “luz solo” (MZSP); three males and three females, “ Brasil, PR, Antonina, \ RPPN— <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-48.696&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-25.316" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -48.696/lat -25.316)">Guaricica</a>, 50m \ 25.316°S 48.696°W \ 23–27.X.2017 Malaise \ A. Domahovski, G. Melo, \ A. Pinto &amp; M. Savaris ” (one couple in DZRJ, CEIOC, and MNRJ); one female: “ Brasil, Paraná, Antonina \ Res. [Reserva] Nat. [Natural] Guaricica, 50m, \ 25.316°S 48.696°W \ 05–09.XI.2018 sweep \ Entomologia UFPR” (DZUP); three males, “MORRETES— PR \ Iapar [Instituto Ambiental do Paraná] \ 23-XI-1984 \ CIIF [<a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-48.696&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-25.316" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -48.696/lat -25.316)">Centro de Identificação de Insetos Fitófagos</a>] (LUMINOSA)” (DZUP); one male, same data as preceding except “ 7 a 8-XII-1985 ” (DZUP); one female, same data as preceding except “26-XI a 3-XII-84” and “(MALAISE)” (DZUP); one female, “MORRETES— PR \ 18-II-1985 \ CIIF—LUMINOSA” (DZUP).</p> <p>Remarks. In F. chelatus sp. nov. the rami of the paraphyses bear apically two acute processes, which give each ramus a pincer-like appearance (Fig. 67). The distal two-thirds of the subgenital plates are narrowed (Fig. 65). The “internal” female sternite VIII in this species bears a characteristic semilunar sclerite (Fig. 73).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D004FE1CA066B401F988FA322FC1FCD0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Felix, Márcio;Mejdalani, Gabriel;Domahovski, Alexandre C.;Cavichioli, Rodney R.	Felix, Márcio, Mejdalani, Gabriel, Domahovski, Alexandre C., Cavichioli, Rodney R. (2022): Eight new Brazilian species of Fonsecaiulus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini) new records of species, and key to males of the genus. Zootaxa 5195 (2): 101-124, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.2.1
D004FE1CA063B41EF988FC072955FB92.text	D004FE1CA063B41EF988FC072955FB92.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fonsecaiulus takiyae Felix & Mejdalani & Domahovski & Cavichioli 2022	<div><p>Fonsecaiulus takiyae sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 79–96)</p> <p>Etymology. This species is named in honor of our colleague and friend Prof. Dr. Daniela M. Takiya (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), who has greatly contributed to our knowledge of the Cicadellidae and other insects.</p> <p>Total length (mm). Male holotype 5.50; male paratypes 5.20–5.60 (n = 3); female paratypes 5.55–5.90 (n = 3).</p> <p>Color (Figs 79–81). Dorsum dark brown with three longitudinal yellow stripes; median stripe broad, extending from anterior margin of crown to apex of clavus, narrowed posteriorly on basal half of clavus; lateral stripes narrow, extending from anterior margin of crown to posterior margin of mesonotum; veins of clavus and claval sulcus covered with yellow. Corium with two irregular yellow stripes extending from anterior portion of brachial cell and connecting posteriorly to each other on inner anteapical cell, outer stripe narrower than inner one; very narrow yellow stripe extending longitudinally near costal margin, posteriorly connected to yellow macula on median and outer anteapical cells.</p> <p>Male terminalia. Pygofer (Fig. 82), in lateral view, well produced posteriorly; posterior margin narrowly rounded; without processes; sparse macrosetae of distinct sizes on posterior portion and extending anteriorly over ventral portion. Valve (Fig. 83), in ventral view, short and broad, subrectangular; anterior margin slightly concave. Subgenital plate (Figs 82–83), in ventral view, subtriangular, basal half broad and with outer margin rounded; plate fused at base to its counterpart; without macrosetae; in dorsal view, with two tiny dentiform processes at apical portion of basal half, not located close to each other, anterior process associated with style apex; in lateral view, plate not extending as far posteriorly as pygofer apex. Connective (Fig. 84), in dorsal view, forming transverse bar, with small stalk, slightly curved posteriorly, with dorsal median keel. Style (Fig. 84), in dorsal view, short but extending farther posteriorly than connective; apophysis with inconspicuous preapical lobe; portion behind lobe strongly narrowed, falciform, bearing setae; apex tapered. Aedeagus (Figs 85, 86), in lateral view, elongate, tubular, tapering slightly toward apex; with pair of slender, acute basiventral processes and pair of small, acute ventroapical processes; gonopore located apically. Paraphyses absent.</p> <p>Female terminalia. Sternite VII (Figs 87–89), in ventral view, with posterior margin trilobed; median lobe broad, rounded. “Internal” sternite VIII, in dorsal view, with sclerotized areas, including three distinct sclerites (indicated by arrows in Fig. 91). First valvifer (Fig. 90), in lateral view, subquadrate. First valvula (Figs 90, 92), second valvula (Figs 93–95), and gonoplac (Fig. 96) much as described for F. spinosus sp. nov. Second valvula with about 32 teeth.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: male, “ Brasil, Paraná, S. [São] J. [José] dos \ Pinhais, 25°36′18″S \ 49°11′37″W 880m \ 13.VIII.2016 Sweep \ A. C. Domahovski leg.” (DZUP). Paratypes: one female, same data as the holotype except “ 19.III.2016 ” (DZUP); one male and one female, same data as preceding except “ 01–28.II.2018 ” (MNRJ); three females, same data as preceding except “ 05–15.XII.2018 ” (DZUP); one female, same data as preceding except “ 01–31.XII.2018 ” (DZUP); one male, same data as preceding except “ 01–28.II.2019 ” and “Malaise” (DZUP); one female, same data as preceding except “ 01–31.I.2019 ” and “Malaise” (DZUP); two males and one female, same data as preceding except “ 28–30.III.2019 ” and “Sweep” (CEIOC); one female, same data as preceding except “ 13. IV.2019 ” (DZUP); one male, same data as preceding except “ 15–19.IV.2019 ” (DZUP); one male, same data as preceding except “ 01–31.VIII.2019 ” and “Malaise” (DZUP); two females, same data as preceding except “ 11– 28.IX.2019 ” and “Sweep” (DZUP); four males and seven females, same data as preceding except “ 14–31.XII.2019 ” (two couples in DZRJ and MNRJ, three females in MZSP); one female, same data as preceding except “ 01– 31.XII.2019 ” and “Malaise” (DZUP); one male and two females, same data as preceding except “ 01–31.I.2020 ” (CEIOC); one male, same data as preceding except “ 01–31.III.2020 ” (CEIOC); one male, same data as preceding except “ 01–30.IX.2021 ” and “Sweep” (MZSP); one male, same data as preceding except “ 01–31.III.2021 ” (MZSP); two females, same data as preceding except “ 08–20.III.2020 ” (DZUP); one male, “ Brasil, Paraná, Morretes \ Estrada da Inhanha [do Anhaia], \ 25°34′38″S 48°52′12″W \ 400m 11.XI.2016 Sweep \ A.C. Domahovski &amp; R.R. \ Cavichioli leg.” (DZRJ); one female, “ Brasil, PR [Paraná], Antonina \ Res. [Reserva] <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-48.696&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-25.316" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -48.696/lat -25.316)">Rio Cachoeira</a>, 50m \ 25.316°S 48.696°W \ 23–27.I.2017 Sweep \ A.C. Domahovski leg.” (DZRJ); one female, same data as preceding except “ 23–27.X.2017 ” (DZUP); one female, same data as preceding except “ 25–26.III.2017 ” (DZUP); one female, “ Brasil, PR [Paraná], Antonina, \ R.P.P.N. [Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural] Guaricica, \ 25.316°S 48.696°W \ 31.I–04.II.2022, Malaise \ Solo, Trilha dos Fornos \ Entomologia—UFPR” (DZUP); one male, “ Brasil, PR [Paraná], Antonina, R.P.P.N. [Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural] \ Guaricica, 25.316°S 48.696°W, \ 17.II–04.III.2022, Malaise Susp. [Suspensa], \ Trilha dos Pinheiros, G. Melo, R. \ R. Cavichioli &amp; A.C. Domahovski ” (DZUP).</p> <p>Remarks. Fonsecaiulus takiyae sp. nov. is our second new species that has no paraphyses. In addition to this feature, it can be distinguished from the remaining species of the genus by the elongate aedeagus, which has a pair of slender, acute basiventral processes and a pair of small, acute ventroapical processes (Figs 85, 86). The posterior margin of the female sternite VII in F. takiyae is trilobed as in F. unciformis sp. nov., but the median lobe is rounded in the former species (Fig. 89) and subquadrate in the latter one (Fig. 53). The “internal” sternite VIII, in dorsal view, has three distinct sclerites (Fig. 91).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D004FE1CA063B41EF988FC072955FB92	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Felix, Márcio;Mejdalani, Gabriel;Domahovski, Alexandre C.;Cavichioli, Rodney R.	Felix, Márcio, Mejdalani, Gabriel, Domahovski, Alexandre C., Cavichioli, Rodney R. (2022): Eight new Brazilian species of Fonsecaiulus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini) new records of species, and key to males of the genus. Zootaxa 5195 (2): 101-124, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.2.1
D004FE1CA07CB41BF988FB4F2F2FFA28.text	D004FE1CA07CB41BF988FB4F2F2FFA28.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fonsecaiulus truncatus Felix & Mejdalani & Domahovski & Cavichioli 2022	<div><p>Fonsecaiulus truncatus sp. nov.</p> <p>(Figs 97–114)</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet, truncatus, refers to the shape of the posterior margin of the male pygofer in lateral view (Fig. 100).</p> <p>Total length (mm). Male holotype 5.38; male paratypes 5.13–5.75 (n = 4); female paratypes 5.44–5.63 (n = 3).</p> <p>Color (Figs 97–99). Dorsum brown with three longitudinal pale yellow stripes extending from anterior margin of crown to posterior margin of mesonotum; median stripe narrowed between pronotum and mesonotum; lateral stripes very narrowed; commissural margin, veins of clavus, and claval sulcus almost entirely pale yellow. Corium with some longitudinal veins partially pale yellow; two pale yellow maculae, one adjacent to median portion of claval sulcus and another on inner anteapical cell.</p> <p>Male terminalia.Pygofer (Fig. 100), in lateral view, slightly produced posteriorly; posterior margin truncate, with inner fold; without processes; sparse macrosetae of distinct sizes distributed mostly on posterior half, except dorsally. Valve (Fig. 101), in ventral view, short and broad, subrectangular; anterior margin slightly concave. Subgenital plate (Figs 100, 101), in ventral view, with basal third broad, pronounced, and with outer margin rounded; plate fused along basal half to its counterpart; without macrosetae; in dorsal view, with two strong dentiform processes at apical portion of basal third, not located close to each other, anterior process associated with style apex; in lateral view, plate extending almost as far posteriorly as pygofer apex. Connective (Fig. 102), in dorsal view, forming transverse bar, with small stalk, slightly curved posteriorly, with dorsal median keel. Style (Fig. 102), in dorsal view, short but extending farther posteriorly than connective; apophysis with conspicuous, pronounced preapical lobe; portion behind lobe strongly narrowed, bearing setae; apex tapered. Aedeagus (Figs 103, 104) symmetrical; shaft, in lateral view, elongate, expanded apically, with pair of basiventral, acute elongate processes, extending posteriorly slightly beyond pygofer apex; gonopore located ventrally at apical third. Paraphyses absent.</p> <p>Female terminalia. Sternite VII (Figs 105–107), in ventral view, with posterior margin, in unmacerated specimens, slightly emarginate, median portion with pair of slight concavities on each side of small median dentiform projection; posterior margin, in macerated specimens, triangularly produced. “Internal” sternite VIII, in dorsal view, with sclerotized areas, including broad anterior sclerite and rounded posterior sclerite (indicated by arrows in Fig. 109). First valvifer (Fig. 108), in lateral view, subrectangular. First valvula (Figs 108, 110), second valvula (Figs 111–113), and gonoplac (Fig. 114) much as described for F. spinosus sp. nov. Second valvula with about 30 teeth.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: male, “ Brasil, Paraná, S. [São] J. [José] dos \ Pinhais, 25°36′18″S \ 49°11′37″W 880m \ 01–31.XII.2019 Malaise \ A. C. Domahovski leg.” (DZUP); two females, same data as the holotype (DZUP); two females, same data as preceding except “ 11.V.2011 ” and “Sweep” (DZUP); two females, same data as preceding except “ 18.VIII.2011 ” (DZUP); one male and one female, same data as preceding except “ 02.V.2015 ” (MNRJ); three females, same data as preceding except “ 30.v.2015 ” (DZUP); one female, same data as preceding except “ 06. IV.2016 ” (DZUP); one male, same data as preceding except “ 27.VII.2016 ” (DZUP); five males and five females, same data as preceding except “ 01–30.X.2016 ” (DZUP); four females, same data as preceding except “ 01–28.II.2018 ” (DZUP); two females, same data as preceding except “ 04.III.2018 ” (DZUP); one male and three females, same data as preceding except “ 05–15.XII.2018 ” (DZUP); one male and one female, same data as preceding except “ 01– 31.XII.2018 ” and “Malaise” (DZRJ); one female, same data as preceding except “ 28–30.III.2019 ” and “Sweep” (DZUP); two females, same data as preceding except “ 13.IV.2019 ” (DZUP); one male and two females, same data as preceding except “ 11–28.IX.2019 ” (CEIOC); two females, same data as preceding except “ 01–31.X.2019 ” and “Malaise” (DZUP); one male and two females, same data as preceding except “ 09.XI.2019 ” and “Sweep” (DZUP); one male, same data as preceding except “ 01–30.XI.2019 ” (DZUP); three females, same data as preceding except “ 14–31.XII.2019 ” and “Sweep” (DZRJ); three males, same data as preceding except “ 01–31.III.2020 ” and “Malaise” (DZRJ, MNRJ, CEIOC); one female, same data as preceding except “ 01–12.I.2020 ” and “Sweep” (MZSP); three females, same data as preceding except “ 08–22.II.2020 ” (MNRJ); one female, same data as preceding except “ 01– 31.III.2020 ” and “Malaise” (CEIOC); one female, same data as preceding except “ 01–30.IV.2020 ” (CEIOC); one female, same data as preceding except “ 19.X.2020 ” and “Sweep” (CEIOC); one female, “ Brasil, Paraná, São José \ dos Pinhais, Br277 Km54 \ (Torre—Telepar) 1060m \ 25°33′18″S 48°58′22″W \ Malaise 18–25.VIII.2015 \ ACD &amp; RRC leg.” (DZUP); one female, same data as preceding except “ 15–22.IX.2015 ” (DZUP); one female, same data as preceding except “ 22–31.IX.2015 ” (DZUP); one male and one female, “ Brasil, Paraná, Piraquara \ Mananciais da Serra, \ proximidades do Reservató- \ rio do Carvalho, 01.II.2019 \ A.C. Domahovski leg.” (DZUP); one female, “ Brasil, PR [Paraná], Piraquara, \ <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-52.40555&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-28.227842" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -52.40555/lat -28.227842)">Mananciais da Serra</a>, \ 25.4967°S 48.9839°W, \ 1010m, malaise \ 01–16.II.2019 G. Melo \ &amp; A. Martins leg.” (DZUP); one female, same data as preceding except “ 16.II–11.III.2019 ” (DZUP); one male, same data as preceding except “ 30.III–14.IV.2020 ” (MZSP); one female, “ Brasil, Paraná, Piraquara, Ma- \ nanciais da Serra, 25.4967°S \ 48.9839°W, 1010m, Sweep, \ 30.XI.2021 A.P. Pinto &amp; \ A.C. Domahovski ” (MZSP); one female, “ Brasil, Paraná, Piraquara, Manan- \ ciais da Serra, 25º29′47”S \ 48º 58′54”W, 1021m sweep \ 27–28.II.2022, A.C. Domahovski ” (MZSP); one male, “ Guarapuava — Paraná \ Est. [Estação] Águas Sta. [Santa] Clara \ Brasil 20.X.1986 \ Lev. [Levantamento] Ent. [Entomológico] Profaupar \ Malaise ” (DZUP); one female, “ Brasil, RS [Rio Grande do Sul], Passo Fundo, \ 28º13′40.23”S \ 52º24′19.97”W \ 20.v.2011 Malaise \ S. Lampert leg.” (DZUP); one female, same data as preceding except “ 18.xi.2021 ” (DZUP).</p> <p>Remarks. Fonsecaiulus truncatus sp. nov. is our third new species that has no paraphyses. It can also be distinguished from other species of the genus by the truncate posterior margin of the pygofer (Fig. 100), pronounced basal portion of the subgenital plates (Fig. 101), and aedeagus expanded apically, bearing an elongate pair of basiventral processes (Figs 103, 104). The female sternite VII has a median dentiform projection (Figs 105–107) and the “internal” sternite VIII, in dorsal view, has a large anterior sclerite (Fig. 109).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D004FE1CA07CB41BF988FB4F2F2FFA28	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Felix, Márcio;Mejdalani, Gabriel;Domahovski, Alexandre C.;Cavichioli, Rodney R.	Felix, Márcio, Mejdalani, Gabriel, Domahovski, Alexandre C., Cavichioli, Rodney R. (2022): Eight new Brazilian species of Fonsecaiulus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini) new records of species, and key to males of the genus. Zootaxa 5195 (2): 101-124, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.2.1
D004FE1CA078B41AF988FF1A2EE1F80E.text	D004FE1CA078B41AF988FF1A2EE1F80E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fonsecaiulus , Young 1977	<div><p>Key to males of Fonsecaiulus</p> <p>1. Crown and pronotum with lateral portions brown, without longitudinal yellow stripes (Felix et al. 2015: figs 4a, b, h)..... 2</p> <p>- Crown and pronotum with lateral pair of longitudinal yellow stripes (Figs 1, 9, 27, 43, 61, 79, 97)..................... 3</p> <p>2. Dorsal yellow stripe broad and occupying most of claval region (Felix et al. 2015: fig. 4h), its outer boarder markedly serrated on clavus; costal yellow mark large and rounded (Felix et al. 2015: fig. 4h); aedeagus, in lateral view, with shaft moderately broad and with long dorsoapical acute process (Young 1977: fig. 624f)................... F. dorsifascia (Osborn, 1926)</p> <p>- Dorsal yellow stripe narrower and not occupying most of claval region (Felix et al. 2015: figs 4a, b), its outer boarder slightly sinuous on clavus; costal yellow mark a very small dot (Felix et al. 2015: fig. 4b); aedeagus, in lateral view, with shaft slender and bearing long apical acute process continuing shaft shape (Felix et al. 2015: fig. 4f)...... F. filiformis Felix et al., 2015</p> <p>3. Mesonotum dark brown, rarely with small faint yellow marks anteriorly; paraphyses with pair of long and narrow rami, each with short process on median portion and a shorter one on apical portion (Young 1977: fig. 626h)... F. sciotus Young, 1977</p> <p>- Mesonotum with distinct longitudinal yellow stripes; paraphyses, when present, with rami not as above................ 4</p> <p>4. Paraphyses with pair of long bifid rami, each one bifurcated from the basal portion (Young 1977: fig. 627h).............................................................................................. F. gaudialis Young, 1977</p> <p>- Paraphyses, when present, with pair of simple rami, at most bifurcated only in the apical portion (Felix et al. 2015: figs 2f, g; Figs 6, 7, 33, 34, 67, 68)............................................................................... 5</p> <p>5. Pygofer very long, about three times longer than high in lateral view (Fig. 30); paraphyses with rami very long, extending posteriorly much farther than aedeagus apex (Figs 33, 34).................................... F. longiramus sp. nov.</p> <p>- Pygofer broad, at most about two times longer than high in lateral view (Figs 4, 12, 38, 46, 64, 82, 100); paraphyses, when present, with rami shorter, ending anterad of aedeagus apex (Figs 15, 67) or extending posteriorly at most a little farther than aedeagus apex (Fig. 7)................................................................................. 6</p> <p>6. Subgenital plates with apical third narrowed in ventral view (Fig. 5); aedeagal shaft with strong acute dorsal process on apical third (Fig. 7)........................................................................... F. youngi sp. nov.</p> <p>- Subgenital plates narrowed along apical half (Fig. 31) or along apical two-thirds (Fig. 13), or subtriangular (Figs 39, 83); aedeagal shaft without such process...................................................................... 7</p> <p>7. Paraphyses with rami crossing each other on median portion (Young 1977: figs 625q, r)....... F. cognatus (Schmidt, 1928)</p> <p>- Paraphyses, when present, with rami not crossing each other or crossing only on apical portion (Figs 8, 16, 34, 50, 68).... 8</p> <p>8. Aedeagus with pair of long and slender basiventral processes that are acute apically (Figs 41, 42, 85, 86, 103, 104); paraphyses absent.............................................................................................. 9</p> <p>- Aedeagus without basiventral processes (Figs 7, 15, 33, 49, 67); paraphyses present............................... 11</p> <p>9. Aedeagus with basiventral processes not extending posteriorly beyond middle of shaft (Fig. 85); shaft long, tubular, with apex slightly tapered, bearing pair of ventral small acute processes (Figs 85, 86)......................... F. takiyae sp. nov.</p> <p>- Aedeagus with basiventral processes attaining or exceeding apex of shaft (Figs 41, 103); shaft shorter and expanded on apical half (Figs 41, 103)................................................................................... 10</p> <p>10. Pygofer truncate posteriorly (Fig. 100); aedeagus with basiventral processes slightly curved medially on apical portion (Fig. 104)............................................................................... F. truncatus sp. nov.</p> <p>- Pygofer broadly rounded posteriorly (Fig. 38); aedeagus with basiventral processes slightly divergent (Fig. 42)............................................................................................. F. alvarengai sp. nov.</p> <p>11. Connective with stalk very long (Felix et al. 2015: fig. 2e); aedeagus strongly curved ventrally and with broad apex (Felix et al. 2015: fig. 2f); paraphyses with short basal plate and pair of long and broad complex rami, each ramus with four acute processes (Felix et al. 2015: figs 2f, g).................................................... F. guttiformis Felix et al., 2015</p> <p>- Connective without stalk (Figs 14, 32, 40, 48, 66) or with stalk very short (Figs 84, 102); aedeagus curved dorsally (Figs 49, 67); paraphyses without basal plate and with rami not as above............................................... 12</p> <p>12. Clavus with one continuous oblique yellow stripe on central portion, not attaining claval apex (Fig. 61); connective with distinct stalk (Fig. 66)....................................................................................... 13</p> <p>- Clavus with one broad yellow stripe extending posteriorly to claval apex, interrupted by a median dark elongate macula (Fig. 43); connective without stalk (Fig. 48)................................................................... 15</p> <p>13. Aedeagus with apex truncate to slightly concave in lateral view (Felix et al. 2015: fig. 1g); paraphyses with pair of long simple rami (Felix et al. 2015: figs 1g, h).............................................. F. rectangularis Felix et al., 2015</p> <p>- Aedeagus with apex tapered, acute in lateral view (Fig. 67); paraphyses with pair of complex rami, bearing variable processes (Fig. 67)........................................................................................... 14</p> <p>14. Paraphyses pincer-like, with distal portion of each ramus with two acute processes, one directed dorsally and another posteriorly (Fig. 67)............................................................................. F. chelatus sp. nov.</p> <p>- Paraphyses with each ramus bearing slender, acute dorsal process on median portion and conspicuous dorsoapical process with apical portion curved posteriorly (Young 1977: fig. 622r)................................. F. flavovittata (Stål, 1859)</p> <p>15. Aedeagus with shaft elongate, subcylindrical and with acute apex, without processes (Figs 49, 50); paraphyses with each ramus bearing ventral subquadrate lobe at median portion and with apex curved ventrally, hook-shaped (Figs 49, 50).............................................................................................. F. unciformis sp. nov.</p> <p>- Aedeagus with shaft very tall and with broad apex (Fig. 15); paraphyses with rami not curved apically, without lobe at median portion (Figs 15, 16)................................................................................. 16</p> <p>16. Aedeagus with irregular dorsoapical process (Young 1977: fig. 623f); paraphyses with rami slender, with apex acute (Young 1977: fig. 623p).......................................................... F. sanguineovittata (Signoret, 1855)</p> <p>- Aedeagus with dorsal row of spines, shaft, in ventral view, with crown of apical spines (Figs 15, 16); paraphyses with rami robust, with apex obtuse (Figs 15, 16)..................................................... F. spinosus sp. nov.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D004FE1CA078B41AF988FF1A2EE1F80E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Felix, Márcio;Mejdalani, Gabriel;Domahovski, Alexandre C.;Cavichioli, Rodney R.	Felix, Márcio, Mejdalani, Gabriel, Domahovski, Alexandre C., Cavichioli, Rodney R. (2022): Eight new Brazilian species of Fonsecaiulus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini) new records of species, and key to males of the genus. Zootaxa 5195 (2): 101-124, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.2.1
