taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03D72F3EFFBCFFA5509ADE7A2AE9FCBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195244/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195244	Fig. 10. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. A‒B. Dorsal and lateral overviews showing the scale and spine pattern. C. Detail showing the cuticular teeth protruding from the mouth ring. D. Elongated dorsal spines with a membrane. E. Terminal dorsal spines. F. Internal morphology of a strongly squeezed specimen (body shape hence not representative). G. Ventral overview. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; F–G = 20 µm.	Fig. 10. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. A‒B. Dorsal and lateral overviews showing the scale and spine pattern. C. Detail showing the cuticular teeth protruding from the mouth ring. D. Elongated dorsal spines with a membrane. E. Terminal dorsal spines. F. Internal morphology of a strongly squeezed specimen (body shape hence not representative). G. Ventral overview. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; F–G = 20 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFBCFFA5509ADE7A2AE9FCBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195246/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195246	Fig. 11. Scales of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. A. Head lateral scales. B. Head dorsal scales. C. Neck dorsal scales. D. Trunk lateral scale. E. Trunk dorsolateral scale. F. Trunk dorsal scale. G. Terminal dorsal scale. H. Furcal ventral three-lobed scales. I. Furcal ventral oblong scales.	Fig. 11. Scales of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. A. Head lateral scales. B. Head dorsal scales. C. Neck dorsal scales. D. Trunk lateral scale. E. Trunk dorsolateral scale. F. Trunk dorsal scale. G. Terminal dorsal scale. H. Furcal ventral three-lobed scales. I. Furcal ventral oblong scales.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFBCFFA5509ADE7A2AE9FCBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195250/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195250	Fig. 12. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., holotype (CU-FNS-11-09-19/HO), differential interference contrast. A‒B. Optical sections showing the general body organization. C. Lateral overview. Arrows in (B) and (C) mark the lateral denticle of spines. Scale bars = 30 µm.	Fig. 12. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., holotype (CU-FNS-11-09-19/HO), differential interference contrast. A‒B. Optical sections showing the general body organization. C. Lateral overview. Arrows in (B) and (C) mark the lateral denticle of spines. Scale bars = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFBCFFA5509ADE7A2AE9FCBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195252/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195252	Fig. 13. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A, C, E, G. Paratype (CU-FNS-25-10-19/PA-1). B, D, F. Paratype (CU-FNS-02-10-19/PA-2). A. Internal morphology. Opposed arrowheads denote posterior pharyngeal dilatations. B. Lateral view of the anterior body region. White star marks the cerebral ganglion. C. Anterior pharyngeal dilatations (opposed arrowheads). D. A pair of cuticular teeth is situated in the center of the mouth ring. E. Ventral view of the head region. Asterisks mark the beginning of the ventral ciliary bands. F. The intestine contains highly refractive and regularly arranged structures (white double arrowheads). G. Furca with a U-shaped indentation and adhesive glands. Scale bars: A = 15 µm; B, E–G = 10 µm; C–D = 5 µm.	Fig. 13. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A, C, E, G. Paratype (CU-FNS-25-10-19/PA-1). B, D, F. Paratype (CU-FNS-02-10-19/PA-2). A. Internal morphology. Opposed arrowheads denote posterior pharyngeal dilatations. B. Lateral view of the anterior body region. White star marks the cerebral ganglion. C. Anterior pharyngeal dilatations (opposed arrowheads). D. A pair of cuticular teeth is situated in the center of the mouth ring. E. Ventral view of the head region. Asterisks mark the beginning of the ventral ciliary bands. F. The intestine contains highly refractive and regularly arranged structures (white double arrowheads). G. Furca with a U-shaped indentation and adhesive glands. Scale bars: A = 15 µm; B, E–G = 10 µm; C–D = 5 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFBCFFA5509ADE7A2AE9FCBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195254/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195254	Fig. 14. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A–B, E. Paratype (CU-FNS-25-10-19/PA-1). C–D, F–G. Paratype (CU-FNS-02-10-19/PA-2). A. Dorsal view showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Head scales. C. Neck and upper trunk dorsolateral scales. D. Terminal dorsal trunk scales with a lateral denticle (arrows). E. Ventral ciliary bands. White dashed lines mark upper-furcal scales. F. Lateral trunk scales. G. Dorsal trunk spines with a membrane. White double arrowheads mark the highly refractive bodies in the intestine. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; B–F = 5 µm; G = 10 µm.	Fig. 14. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A–B, E. Paratype (CU-FNS-25-10-19/PA-1). C–D, F–G. Paratype (CU-FNS-02-10-19/PA-2). A. Dorsal view showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Head scales. C. Neck and upper trunk dorsolateral scales. D. Terminal dorsal trunk scales with a lateral denticle (arrows). E. Ventral ciliary bands. White dashed lines mark upper-furcal scales. F. Lateral trunk scales. G. Dorsal trunk spines with a membrane. White double arrowheads mark the highly refractive bodies in the intestine. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; B–F = 5 µm; G = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFBCFFA5509ADE7A2AE9FCBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195230/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195230	Fig. 5. Secondary structure of the 18S rRNA molecule of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. The single diagnostic molecular autapomorphy (red arrow) is situated in the terminal loop of helix 21es6c in the V4 region of the C domain. Note the long-range tertiary contacts between the V2 and V4 regions (highlighted in pink). The reference 18S secondary structure map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen ex E.C.Hansen (inset) is from http://apollo.chemistry.gatech.edu/RibosomeGallery (Petrov et al. 2014).	Fig. 5. Secondary structure of the 18S rRNA molecule of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. The single diagnostic molecular autapomorphy (red arrow) is situated in the terminal loop of helix 21es6c in the V4 region of the C domain. Note the long-range tertiary contacts between the V2 and V4 regions (highlighted in pink). The reference 18S secondary structure map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen ex E.C.Hansen (inset) is from http://apollo.chemistry.gatech.edu/RibosomeGallery (Petrov et al. 2014).	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFBCFFA5509ADE7A2AE9FCBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195236/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195236	Fig. 7. Secondary structure of the first two domains of the 5.8‒28S rRNA molecule of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. Diagnostic molecular autapomorphies are marked by red arrows. The reference 28S secondary structure map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen ex E.C.Hansen (inset) is from http://apollo.chemistry.gatech.edu/RibosomeGallery (Petrov et al. 2014).	Fig. 7. Secondary structure of the first two domains of the 5.8‒28S rRNA molecule of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. Diagnostic molecular autapomorphies are marked by red arrows. The reference 28S secondary structure map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen ex E.C.Hansen (inset) is from http://apollo.chemistry.gatech.edu/RibosomeGallery (Petrov et al. 2014).	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFBCFFA5509ADE7A2AE9FCBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195242/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195242	Fig. 9. Phylogenetic subtree based on 18S, 28S, and COI, showing the systematic positions of the nine new species within the Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster. Arrows mark the same node in the subtree and the inset phylogram. The whole tree is presented in Fig. 8. The Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster is highlighted in the inset phylogram. ML bootstrap values and posterior probabilities were mapped onto the best ML tree.	Fig. 9. Phylogenetic subtree based on 18S, 28S, and COI, showing the systematic positions of the nine new species within the Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster. Arrows mark the same node in the subtree and the inset phylogram. The whole tree is presented in Fig. 8. The Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster is highlighted in the inset phylogram. ML bootstrap values and posterior probabilities were mapped onto the best ML tree.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFBCFFA5509ADE7A2AE9FCBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195260/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195260	Fig. 16. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) superbus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A. Holotype (CU-FNS-15-06-20/HO), lateral overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Paratype (CU-FNS-22-06-20/PA), optical section showing the internal morphology in lateral view. Black stars in (A) mark the epipleurae and hypopleurae. White star in (B) marks the cerebral ganglion. Arrows mark the lateral denticle of spines. Scale bars = 30 µm.	Fig. 16. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) superbus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A. Holotype (CU-FNS-15-06-20/HO), lateral overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Paratype (CU-FNS-22-06-20/PA), optical section showing the internal morphology in lateral view. Black stars in (A) mark the epipleurae and hypopleurae. White star in (B) marks the cerebral ganglion. Arrows mark the lateral denticle of spines. Scale bars = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFBCFFA5509ADE7A2AE9FCBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195262/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195262	Fig. 17. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) superbus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A–B. Paratype (CU-FNS-22-06-20/PA). C–G. Holotype (CU-FNS-15-06-20/HO). A. Detail showing the salivary gland, pharyngeal-intestinal junction, and differentiated anterior section of the intestine. B. Detail showing the connection of transversal bands to the base of scales. C. Detail showing the anterior portion of the digestive tract. D. Head scales. E. Neck scales. F. Spines. G. Trunk spined scales. Scale bars: A–B, D‒G = 5 µm; C = 10 µm.	Fig. 17. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) superbus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A–B. Paratype (CU-FNS-22-06-20/PA). C–G. Holotype (CU-FNS-15-06-20/HO). A. Detail showing the salivary gland, pharyngeal-intestinal junction, and differentiated anterior section of the intestine. B. Detail showing the connection of transversal bands to the base of scales. C. Detail showing the anterior portion of the digestive tract. D. Head scales. E. Neck scales. F. Spines. G. Trunk spined scales. Scale bars: A–B, D‒G = 5 µm; C = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFB4FFA0509BDE0C2AFBF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195258/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195258	Fig. 15. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus)superbus sp. nov.A, H. Dorsal and lateral overviews showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Head scale. C. Neck scale. D. Trunk scale. E. Ventral scales. F. Upperfurcal dorsal scales. G. Lateral view of a trunk spined scale. I. Lateral view showing the connection of a transversal band to the base of a scale. J. Lateral overview showing the internal morphology. K. Lateral view of the anterior body region. Scale bars = 30 µm.	Fig. 15. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus)superbus sp. nov.A, H. Dorsal and lateral overviews showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Head scale. C. Neck scale. D. Trunk scale. E. Ventral scales. F. Upperfurcal dorsal scales. G. Lateral view of a trunk spined scale. I. Lateral view showing the connection of a transversal band to the base of a scale. J. Lateral overview showing the internal morphology. K. Lateral view of the anterior body region. Scale bars = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFB4FFA0509BDE0C2AFBF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195260/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195260	Fig. 16. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) superbus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A. Holotype (CU-FNS-15-06-20/HO), lateral overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Paratype (CU-FNS-22-06-20/PA), optical section showing the internal morphology in lateral view. Black stars in (A) mark the epipleurae and hypopleurae. White star in (B) marks the cerebral ganglion. Arrows mark the lateral denticle of spines. Scale bars = 30 µm.	Fig. 16. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) superbus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A. Holotype (CU-FNS-15-06-20/HO), lateral overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Paratype (CU-FNS-22-06-20/PA), optical section showing the internal morphology in lateral view. Black stars in (A) mark the epipleurae and hypopleurae. White star in (B) marks the cerebral ganglion. Arrows mark the lateral denticle of spines. Scale bars = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFB4FFA0509BDE0C2AFBF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195262/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195262	Fig. 17. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) superbus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A–B. Paratype (CU-FNS-22-06-20/PA). C–G. Holotype (CU-FNS-15-06-20/HO). A. Detail showing the salivary gland, pharyngeal-intestinal junction, and differentiated anterior section of the intestine. B. Detail showing the connection of transversal bands to the base of scales. C. Detail showing the anterior portion of the digestive tract. D. Head scales. E. Neck scales. F. Spines. G. Trunk spined scales. Scale bars: A–B, D‒G = 5 µm; C = 10 µm.	Fig. 17. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) superbus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A–B. Paratype (CU-FNS-22-06-20/PA). C–G. Holotype (CU-FNS-15-06-20/HO). A. Detail showing the salivary gland, pharyngeal-intestinal junction, and differentiated anterior section of the intestine. B. Detail showing the connection of transversal bands to the base of scales. C. Detail showing the anterior portion of the digestive tract. D. Head scales. E. Neck scales. F. Spines. G. Trunk spined scales. Scale bars: A–B, D‒G = 5 µm; C = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFB4FFA0509BDE0C2AFBF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195218/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195218	Fig. 1. Map of Europe showing the localization of Slovakia. Map tiles by ©Stamen Design, under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license. Data by OpenStreetMap, under ODbL.	Fig. 1. Map of Europe showing the localization of Slovakia. Map tiles by ©Stamen Design, under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license. Data by OpenStreetMap, under ODbL.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFB4FFA0509BDE0C2AFBF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195242/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195242	Fig. 9. Phylogenetic subtree based on 18S, 28S, and COI, showing the systematic positions of the nine new species within the Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster. Arrows mark the same node in the subtree and the inset phylogram. The whole tree is presented in Fig. 8. The Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster is highlighted in the inset phylogram. ML bootstrap values and posterior probabilities were mapped onto the best ML tree.	Fig. 9. Phylogenetic subtree based on 18S, 28S, and COI, showing the systematic positions of the nine new species within the Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster. Arrows mark the same node in the subtree and the inset phylogram. The whole tree is presented in Fig. 8. The Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster is highlighted in the inset phylogram. ML bootstrap values and posterior probabilities were mapped onto the best ML tree.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFB4FFA0509BDE0C2AFBF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195252/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195252	Fig. 13. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A, C, E, G. Paratype (CU-FNS-25-10-19/PA-1). B, D, F. Paratype (CU-FNS-02-10-19/PA-2). A. Internal morphology. Opposed arrowheads denote posterior pharyngeal dilatations. B. Lateral view of the anterior body region. White star marks the cerebral ganglion. C. Anterior pharyngeal dilatations (opposed arrowheads). D. A pair of cuticular teeth is situated in the center of the mouth ring. E. Ventral view of the head region. Asterisks mark the beginning of the ventral ciliary bands. F. The intestine contains highly refractive and regularly arranged structures (white double arrowheads). G. Furca with a U-shaped indentation and adhesive glands. Scale bars: A = 15 µm; B, E–G = 10 µm; C–D = 5 µm.	Fig. 13. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A, C, E, G. Paratype (CU-FNS-25-10-19/PA-1). B, D, F. Paratype (CU-FNS-02-10-19/PA-2). A. Internal morphology. Opposed arrowheads denote posterior pharyngeal dilatations. B. Lateral view of the anterior body region. White star marks the cerebral ganglion. C. Anterior pharyngeal dilatations (opposed arrowheads). D. A pair of cuticular teeth is situated in the center of the mouth ring. E. Ventral view of the head region. Asterisks mark the beginning of the ventral ciliary bands. F. The intestine contains highly refractive and regularly arranged structures (white double arrowheads). G. Furca with a U-shaped indentation and adhesive glands. Scale bars: A = 15 µm; B, E–G = 10 µm; C–D = 5 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFB4FFA0509BDE0C2AFBF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195270/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195270	Fig. 19. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov. A. Ventral overview showing the scale and ciliary pattern. B. V-shaped scales without keels. C. Bowl-shaped scales without keels. D. Detail of the ventral posterior body region. E. Internal morphology. F. Narrowly obovate keeled scale. G. Fusiform keeled scale. H. Oblong spined scale. Scale bars: A, E = 30 µm; D = 10 µm.	Fig. 19. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov. A. Ventral overview showing the scale and ciliary pattern. B. V-shaped scales without keels. C. Bowl-shaped scales without keels. D. Detail of the ventral posterior body region. E. Internal morphology. F. Narrowly obovate keeled scale. G. Fusiform keeled scale. H. Oblong spined scale. Scale bars: A, E = 30 µm; D = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF8EFF975098DC3628FFFEF1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195266/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195266	Fig. 18. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov. A. Dorsal overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B–C. Details showing the distribution of head and trunk scales. D–E. Head and trunk scales, the schematic drawing of the scale base is shown above that of spined scales. F. Lateral view of a trunk spined scale. G. Dorsal furcal scales. Scale bar = 30 µm.	Fig. 18. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov. A. Dorsal overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B–C. Details showing the distribution of head and trunk scales. D–E. Head and trunk scales, the schematic drawing of the scale base is shown above that of spined scales. F. Lateral view of a trunk spined scale. G. Dorsal furcal scales. Scale bar = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF8EFF975098DC3628FFFEF1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195270/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195270	Fig. 19. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov. A. Ventral overview showing the scale and ciliary pattern. B. V-shaped scales without keels. C. Bowl-shaped scales without keels. D. Detail of the ventral posterior body region. E. Internal morphology. F. Narrowly obovate keeled scale. G. Fusiform keeled scale. H. Oblong spined scale. Scale bars: A, E = 30 µm; D = 10 µm.	Fig. 19. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov. A. Ventral overview showing the scale and ciliary pattern. B. V-shaped scales without keels. C. Bowl-shaped scales without keels. D. Detail of the ventral posterior body region. E. Internal morphology. F. Narrowly obovate keeled scale. G. Fusiform keeled scale. H. Oblong spined scale. Scale bars: A, E = 30 µm; D = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF8EFF975098DC3628FFFEF1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195272/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195272	Fig. 20. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast.A. Paratype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-3/PA-2). B–C. Holotype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-1/HO). A. Overview showing the general body organization. Asterisks mark the beginning of the ventral ciliary bands. B‒C. Surface views, showing the head and trunk scale patterns. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; B = 5 µm; C = 10 µm.	Fig. 20. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast.A. Paratype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-3/PA-2). B–C. Holotype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-1/HO). A. Overview showing the general body organization. Asterisks mark the beginning of the ventral ciliary bands. B‒C. Surface views, showing the head and trunk scale patterns. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; B = 5 µm; C = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF8EFF975098DC3628FFFEF1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195276/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195276	Fig. 21. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A–B, D. Paratype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-3/PA-2). C. Holotype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-1/HO). A. Detail of the anterior body region. B. Ventral view of the head region. Asterisks mark the beginning of the ventral ciliary bands, arrows mark the cuticular structures of the hypostomium. C‒D. Details of the posterior body region, showing the ovaries and the organ X. Scale bars = 10 µm.	Fig. 21. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A–B, D. Paratype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-3/PA-2). C. Holotype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-1/HO). A. Detail of the anterior body region. B. Ventral view of the head region. Asterisks mark the beginning of the ventral ciliary bands, arrows mark the cuticular structures of the hypostomium. C‒D. Details of the posterior body region, showing the ovaries and the organ X. Scale bars = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF8EFF975098DC3628FFFEF1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195278/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195278	Fig. 22. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A, D–F. Paratype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-3/PA-2). B–C. Holotype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-1/HO). A. Scales in the ventral interciliary field. B. Trunk scales. C. Head scales. D‒E. Details of the ventral posterior body region. F. Oblong spined scales. Scale bars: A‒E = 5 µm; F = 2 µm.	Fig. 22. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A, D–F. Paratype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-3/PA-2). B–C. Holotype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-1/HO). A. Scales in the ventral interciliary field. B. Trunk scales. C. Head scales. D‒E. Details of the ventral posterior body region. F. Oblong spined scales. Scale bars: A‒E = 5 µm; F = 2 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF8EFF975098DC3628FFFEF1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195222/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195222	Fig. 2. Sampling sites of nine new gastrotrich species discovered in Slovakia. A. One locality (STV) was situated in northern Slovakia, while five localities were concentrated in the capital city of Bratislava (marked by the red rectangle). B. Detail of the Bratislava district showing the localization of five sampling sites. Map tiles by ©Stamen Design, under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license. Data by OpenStreetMap, under ODbL.	Fig. 2. Sampling sites of nine new gastrotrich species discovered in Slovakia. A. One locality (STV) was situated in northern Slovakia, while five localities were concentrated in the capital city of Bratislava (marked by the red rectangle). B. Detail of the Bratislava district showing the localization of five sampling sites. Map tiles by ©Stamen Design, under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license. Data by OpenStreetMap, under ODbL.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF8EFF975098DC3628FFFEF1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195254/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195254	Fig. 14. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A–B, E. Paratype (CU-FNS-25-10-19/PA-1). C–D, F–G. Paratype (CU-FNS-02-10-19/PA-2). A. Dorsal view showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Head scales. C. Neck and upper trunk dorsolateral scales. D. Terminal dorsal trunk scales with a lateral denticle (arrows). E. Ventral ciliary bands. White dashed lines mark upper-furcal scales. F. Lateral trunk scales. G. Dorsal trunk spines with a membrane. White double arrowheads mark the highly refractive bodies in the intestine. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; B–F = 5 µm; G = 10 µm.	Fig. 14. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A–B, E. Paratype (CU-FNS-25-10-19/PA-1). C–D, F–G. Paratype (CU-FNS-02-10-19/PA-2). A. Dorsal view showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Head scales. C. Neck and upper trunk dorsolateral scales. D. Terminal dorsal trunk scales with a lateral denticle (arrows). E. Ventral ciliary bands. White dashed lines mark upper-furcal scales. F. Lateral trunk scales. G. Dorsal trunk spines with a membrane. White double arrowheads mark the highly refractive bodies in the intestine. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; B–F = 5 µm; G = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF86FF8F50A5DC532BD5FD2B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195282/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195282	Fig. 23. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) avarus sp. nov. A. Dorsal overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B–C. Head scales. D. Neck dorsolateral scale. E. Lateral view of a trunk spined scale. F. Neck central scales. G. Trunk scales. H. Posterior trunk scales. I. Dorsal furca branches scales. J. Dorsal furca base scales. K. Internal morphology. L. Lateral overview. Scale bars = 30 µm.	Fig. 23. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) avarus sp. nov. A. Dorsal overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B–C. Head scales. D. Neck dorsolateral scale. E. Lateral view of a trunk spined scale. F. Neck central scales. G. Trunk scales. H. Posterior trunk scales. I. Dorsal furca branches scales. J. Dorsal furca base scales. K. Internal morphology. L. Lateral overview. Scale bars = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF86FF8F50A5DC532BD5FD2B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195284/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195284	Fig. 24. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) avarus sp. nov. A. Ventral overview showing the scale and ciliary pattern. B. Mouth region. C. Detail showing the transition region of two scale types in the interciliary field. D–E. Ventrolateral three-lobed scales. F. Ventral furcal three-lobed scales. G. Furcal cordiform scales. H. Detail of the terminal ventral region. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; H = 10 µm.	Fig. 24. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) avarus sp. nov. A. Ventral overview showing the scale and ciliary pattern. B. Mouth region. C. Detail showing the transition region of two scale types in the interciliary field. D–E. Ventrolateral three-lobed scales. F. Ventral furcal three-lobed scales. G. Furcal cordiform scales. H. Detail of the terminal ventral region. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; H = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF86FF8F50A5DC532BD5FD2B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195288/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195288	Fig. 25. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) avarus sp. nov., paratype (CU-FNS-26-02-20/PA-2), differential interference contrast. A–B. Optical section showing the internal morphology. C. Ventral overview. Scale bars = 30 µm.	Fig. 25. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) avarus sp. nov., paratype (CU-FNS-26-02-20/PA-2), differential interference contrast. A–B. Optical section showing the internal morphology. C. Ventral overview. Scale bars = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF86FF8F50A5DC532BD5FD2B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195290/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195290	Fig. 26. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) avarus sp. nov., paratype (CU-FNS-26-02-20/PA-2), differential interference contrast. A. Anterior body region. B. Anteriorly merged ventral ciliary bands. C. Detail of the mouth region. Hypostomium bears a pentagonal cuticular plate with two central protuberances. Scale bars = 10 µm.	Fig. 26. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) avarus sp. nov., paratype (CU-FNS-26-02-20/PA-2), differential interference contrast. A. Anterior body region. B. Anteriorly merged ventral ciliary bands. C. Detail of the mouth region. Hypostomium bears a pentagonal cuticular plate with two central protuberances. Scale bars = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF86FF8F50A5DC532BD5FD2B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195292/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195292	Fig. 27. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) avarus sp. nov., paratype (CU-FNS-26-02-20/PA-2), differential interference contrast. A. Dorsal head scales. B. Overview showing the dorsal scale and spine pattern. C. Posterior trunk scales. D. Scales in the ventral interciliary field. E. Detail of the ventral posterior region. Scale bars: A, C–D = 5 µm; B = 30 µm; E = 15 µm.	Fig. 27. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) avarus sp. nov., paratype (CU-FNS-26-02-20/PA-2), differential interference contrast. A. Dorsal head scales. B. Overview showing the dorsal scale and spine pattern. C. Posterior trunk scales. D. Scales in the ventral interciliary field. E. Detail of the ventral posterior region. Scale bars: A, C–D = 5 µm; B = 30 µm; E = 15 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF86FF8F50A5DC532BD5FD2B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195224/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195224	Fig. 3. Terminology and measurement scheme for scales and spines. A. Frontal view. B. Lateral view.	Fig. 3. Terminology and measurement scheme for scales and spines. A. Frontal view. B. Lateral view.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF86FF8F50A5DC532BD5FD2B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195258/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195258	Fig. 15. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus)superbus sp. nov.A, H. Dorsal and lateral overviews showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Head scale. C. Neck scale. D. Trunk scale. E. Ventral scales. F. Upperfurcal dorsal scales. G. Lateral view of a trunk spined scale. I. Lateral view showing the connection of a transversal band to the base of a scale. J. Lateral overview showing the internal morphology. K. Lateral view of the anterior body region. Scale bars = 30 µm.	Fig. 15. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus)superbus sp. nov.A, H. Dorsal and lateral overviews showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Head scale. C. Neck scale. D. Trunk scale. E. Ventral scales. F. Upperfurcal dorsal scales. G. Lateral view of a trunk spined scale. I. Lateral view showing the connection of a transversal band to the base of a scale. J. Lateral overview showing the internal morphology. K. Lateral view of the anterior body region. Scale bars = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF9EFF8A50AEDFFD2C0EF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195296/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195296	Fig. 28. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) luxus sp. nov. A, H. Dorsal and lateral overviews showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Head scale. C. Neck and upper-trunk scale. D–E. Frontal and lateral views of a trunk spined scale. F. Posterior trunk scale. G. Dorsal furcal scale. Scale bars = 30 µm.	Fig. 28. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) luxus sp. nov. A, H. Dorsal and lateral overviews showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Head scale. C. Neck and upper-trunk scale. D–E. Frontal and lateral views of a trunk spined scale. F. Posterior trunk scale. G. Dorsal furcal scale. Scale bars = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF9EFF8A50AEDFFD2C0EF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195300/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195300	Fig. 29. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) luxus sp. nov. A. Ventral overview showing the scale and ciliary pattern. B. Ventrolateral scale. C. Ventral furcal scale. D. Internal morphology. E. Detail of the ventral terminal body region. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; D = 20 µm; E = 10 µm.	Fig. 29. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) luxus sp. nov. A. Ventral overview showing the scale and ciliary pattern. B. Ventrolateral scale. C. Ventral furcal scale. D. Internal morphology. E. Detail of the ventral terminal body region. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; D = 20 µm; E = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF9EFF8A50AEDFFD2C0EF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195302/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195302	Fig. 30. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) luxus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A, E. Paratype (CU-FNS-17-02-20/PA-1). B–D, F–G. Paratype (CU-FNS-17-02-20/PA-2). A. Lateral overview showing the internal morphology. B. Anterior body region. C. Head scales. D. Dorsolateral trunk scales. E. Lateral view of dorsal trunk spined scales carrying a minute lateral denticle (arrows). F. Ventral furcal scales. G. Dorsolateral oblong scales lining the furca sides. White stars in (A) and (B) mark the cerebral ganglion. Scale bars: A = 15 µm; B, E = 10 µm; C–D, F–G = 5 µm.	Fig. 30. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) luxus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A, E. Paratype (CU-FNS-17-02-20/PA-1). B–D, F–G. Paratype (CU-FNS-17-02-20/PA-2). A. Lateral overview showing the internal morphology. B. Anterior body region. C. Head scales. D. Dorsolateral trunk scales. E. Lateral view of dorsal trunk spined scales carrying a minute lateral denticle (arrows). F. Ventral furcal scales. G. Dorsolateral oblong scales lining the furca sides. White stars in (A) and (B) mark the cerebral ganglion. Scale bars: A = 15 µm; B, E = 10 µm; C–D, F–G = 5 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF9EFF8A50AEDFFD2C0EF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195226/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195226	Fig. 4. Histograms showing intra- and interspecies p-distances of four molecular markers studied in nine new gastrotrich species. A. Barcoding analysis of 18S rRNA gene sequences. The black arrow marks the overlap between intra- and interspecies p-distances. B. Barcoding analysis of ITS2 molecules. Sequences are identical within species (red arrow), while interspecies p-distances range from 5.88% to as much as 34.76%. C. Barcoding analysis of the first two domains of 28S rRNA gene. Although there is no overlap between intra- and interspecies p-distances, no distinct barcoding gap is recognizable. D. Barcoding analysis of COI showing the distinct gap between intra- and interspecies p-distances (red arrow).	Fig. 4. Histograms showing intra- and interspecies p-distances of four molecular markers studied in nine new gastrotrich species. A. Barcoding analysis of 18S rRNA gene sequences. The black arrow marks the overlap between intra- and interspecies p-distances. B. Barcoding analysis of ITS2 molecules. Sequences are identical within species (red arrow), while interspecies p-distances range from 5.88% to as much as 34.76%. C. Barcoding analysis of the first two domains of 28S rRNA gene. Although there is no overlap between intra- and interspecies p-distances, no distinct barcoding gap is recognizable. D. Barcoding analysis of COI showing the distinct gap between intra- and interspecies p-distances (red arrow).	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF9EFF8A50AEDFFD2C0EF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195244/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195244	Fig. 10. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. A‒B. Dorsal and lateral overviews showing the scale and spine pattern. C. Detail showing the cuticular teeth protruding from the mouth ring. D. Elongated dorsal spines with a membrane. E. Terminal dorsal spines. F. Internal morphology of a strongly squeezed specimen (body shape hence not representative). G. Ventral overview. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; F–G = 20 µm.	Fig. 10. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. A‒B. Dorsal and lateral overviews showing the scale and spine pattern. C. Detail showing the cuticular teeth protruding from the mouth ring. D. Elongated dorsal spines with a membrane. E. Terminal dorsal spines. F. Internal morphology of a strongly squeezed specimen (body shape hence not representative). G. Ventral overview. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; F–G = 20 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF9EFF8A50AEDFFD2C0EF830.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195260/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195260	Fig. 16. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) superbus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A. Holotype (CU-FNS-15-06-20/HO), lateral overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Paratype (CU-FNS-22-06-20/PA), optical section showing the internal morphology in lateral view. Black stars in (A) mark the epipleurae and hypopleurae. White star in (B) marks the cerebral ganglion. Arrows mark the lateral denticle of spines. Scale bars = 30 µm.	Fig. 16. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) superbus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A. Holotype (CU-FNS-15-06-20/HO), lateral overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Paratype (CU-FNS-22-06-20/PA), optical section showing the internal morphology in lateral view. Black stars in (A) mark the epipleurae and hypopleurae. White star in (B) marks the cerebral ganglion. Arrows mark the lateral denticle of spines. Scale bars = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF98FF8550A8DC362C0EFDC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195304/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195304	Fig. 31. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) iratus sp. nov. A. Dorsal overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B, D. Lateral and dorsal views of a head scale. C, F. Lateral and dorsal views of a trunk scale. E. Dorsolateral head scale. G. Ventrolateral trunk scale. H. Furca branches scale. I. Detail showing the mouth region. J. Internal morphology. The structure of the cerebral ganglion was observed only in a single specimen. Scale bar = 30 µm.	Fig. 31. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) iratus sp. nov. A. Dorsal overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B, D. Lateral and dorsal views of a head scale. C, F. Lateral and dorsal views of a trunk scale. E. Dorsolateral head scale. G. Ventrolateral trunk scale. H. Furca branches scale. I. Detail showing the mouth region. J. Internal morphology. The structure of the cerebral ganglion was observed only in a single specimen. Scale bar = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF98FF8550A8DC362C0EFDC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195308/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195308	Fig. 32. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) iratus sp. nov., holotype (CU-FNS-21-09-20/HO), differential interference contrast. A. Overview showing the internal morphology. B. Pharynx. C. Mouth. D. Head scales. E. Detail showing the posterior section of the pharynx, the pharyngeal-intestinal junction, and the differentiated anterior section of the intestine. F. Detail of the mouth region. Arrows mark the hypostomial structures, asterisks mark the beginning of ciliary bands. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; B = 10 µm; C–D = 2 µm; E–F = 5 µm.	Fig. 32. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) iratus sp. nov., holotype (CU-FNS-21-09-20/HO), differential interference contrast. A. Overview showing the internal morphology. B. Pharynx. C. Mouth. D. Head scales. E. Detail showing the posterior section of the pharynx, the pharyngeal-intestinal junction, and the differentiated anterior section of the intestine. F. Detail of the mouth region. Arrows mark the hypostomial structures, asterisks mark the beginning of ciliary bands. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; B = 10 µm; C–D = 2 µm; E–F = 5 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF98FF8550A8DC362C0EFDC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195230/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195230	Fig. 5. Secondary structure of the 18S rRNA molecule of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. The single diagnostic molecular autapomorphy (red arrow) is situated in the terminal loop of helix 21es6c in the V4 region of the C domain. Note the long-range tertiary contacts between the V2 and V4 regions (highlighted in pink). The reference 18S secondary structure map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen ex E.C.Hansen (inset) is from http://apollo.chemistry.gatech.edu/RibosomeGallery (Petrov et al. 2014).	Fig. 5. Secondary structure of the 18S rRNA molecule of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. The single diagnostic molecular autapomorphy (red arrow) is situated in the terminal loop of helix 21es6c in the V4 region of the C domain. Note the long-range tertiary contacts between the V2 and V4 regions (highlighted in pink). The reference 18S secondary structure map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen ex E.C.Hansen (inset) is from http://apollo.chemistry.gatech.edu/RibosomeGallery (Petrov et al. 2014).	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF98FF8550A8DC362C0EFDC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195246/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195246	Fig. 11. Scales of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. A. Head lateral scales. B. Head dorsal scales. C. Neck dorsal scales. D. Trunk lateral scale. E. Trunk dorsolateral scale. F. Trunk dorsal scale. G. Terminal dorsal scale. H. Furcal ventral three-lobed scales. I. Furcal ventral oblong scales.	Fig. 11. Scales of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. A. Head lateral scales. B. Head dorsal scales. C. Neck dorsal scales. D. Trunk lateral scale. E. Trunk dorsolateral scale. F. Trunk dorsal scale. G. Terminal dorsal scale. H. Furcal ventral three-lobed scales. I. Furcal ventral oblong scales.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF98FF8550A8DC362C0EFDC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195262/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195262	Fig. 17. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) superbus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A–B. Paratype (CU-FNS-22-06-20/PA). C–G. Holotype (CU-FNS-15-06-20/HO). A. Detail showing the salivary gland, pharyngeal-intestinal junction, and differentiated anterior section of the intestine. B. Detail showing the connection of transversal bands to the base of scales. C. Detail showing the anterior portion of the digestive tract. D. Head scales. E. Neck scales. F. Spines. G. Trunk spined scales. Scale bars: A–B, D‒G = 5 µm; C = 10 µm.	Fig. 17. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) superbus sp. nov., differential interference contrast. A–B. Paratype (CU-FNS-22-06-20/PA). C–G. Holotype (CU-FNS-15-06-20/HO). A. Detail showing the salivary gland, pharyngeal-intestinal junction, and differentiated anterior section of the intestine. B. Detail showing the connection of transversal bands to the base of scales. C. Detail showing the anterior portion of the digestive tract. D. Head scales. E. Neck scales. F. Spines. G. Trunk spined scales. Scale bars: A–B, D‒G = 5 µm; C = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF94FFFF50A3DF9B2DA4F9C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195310/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195310	Fig. 33. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) gulosus sp. nov. A. Dorsal overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Ventral overview showing the scale and ciliary pattern. Scale bar = 30 µm.	Fig. 33. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) gulosus sp. nov. A. Dorsal overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B. Ventral overview showing the scale and ciliary pattern. Scale bar = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF94FFFF50A3DF9B2DA4F9C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195314/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195314	Fig. 34. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) gulosus sp. nov., schematic drawings of scales. A. Head scale. B. Neck scale. C. Dorsal trunk scales. D–E. Dorsolateral and lateral trunk scales. F. Ventrolateral trunk scales. G. Posteriormost ventral trunk scales. H. Scales of the ventral interciliary field. I. Ventral furcal scales.	Fig. 34. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) gulosus sp. nov., schematic drawings of scales. A. Head scale. B. Neck scale. C. Dorsal trunk scales. D–E. Dorsolateral and lateral trunk scales. F. Ventrolateral trunk scales. G. Posteriormost ventral trunk scales. H. Scales of the ventral interciliary field. I. Ventral furcal scales.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF94FFFF50A3DF9B2DA4F9C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195316/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195316	Fig. 35. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) gulosus sp. nov., paratype (CU-FNS-28-10-19/PA), differential interference contrast. A–B. Details of the anterior body region. C. Optical section of the trunk and furca regions. D. Scale and spine pattern of the dorsal trunk region. Scale bars = 15 µm.	Fig. 35. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) gulosus sp. nov., paratype (CU-FNS-28-10-19/PA), differential interference contrast. A–B. Details of the anterior body region. C. Optical section of the trunk and furca regions. D. Scale and spine pattern of the dorsal trunk region. Scale bars = 15 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF94FFFF50A3DF9B2DA4F9C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195320/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195320	Fig. 36. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) gulosus sp. nov., paratype (CU-FNS-28-10-19/PA), differential interference contrast. A. Scales of the ventral interciliary field. B. Dorsal trunk scales. C. Detail of the posterior body region. D. Posterior ventral keeled and spined scales. Scale bars: A, D = 5 µm; B–C = 10 µm.	Fig. 36. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) gulosus sp. nov., paratype (CU-FNS-28-10-19/PA), differential interference contrast. A. Scales of the ventral interciliary field. B. Dorsal trunk scales. C. Detail of the posterior body region. D. Posterior ventral keeled and spined scales. Scale bars: A, D = 5 µm; B–C = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF94FFFF50A3DF9B2DA4F9C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195232/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195232	Fig. 6. ITS2 of the subgenus Hystricochaetonotus Schwank, 1990. A. Putative consensus secondary structure.The central loop radiates four unequally long helices. The first two helices are highly conserved, while the two following helices are much less conserved. For localization of helix 10, which is made by the interaction of 3’-end of 5.8S and 5’-end of 28S, see Fig. 7. B. Two different views on the tertiary structure, showing that helices II and IV run in parallel. C. Structure logos of helices I‒IV. The height of a base is proportional to its frequency in the multiple sequence alignment.	Fig. 6. ITS2 of the subgenus Hystricochaetonotus Schwank, 1990. A. Putative consensus secondary structure.The central loop radiates four unequally long helices. The first two helices are highly conserved, while the two following helices are much less conserved. For localization of helix 10, which is made by the interaction of 3’-end of 5.8S and 5’-end of 28S, see Fig. 7. B. Two different views on the tertiary structure, showing that helices II and IV run in parallel. C. Structure logos of helices I‒IV. The height of a base is proportional to its frequency in the multiple sequence alignment.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF94FFFF50A3DF9B2DA4F9C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195246/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195246	Fig. 11. Scales of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. A. Head lateral scales. B. Head dorsal scales. C. Neck dorsal scales. D. Trunk lateral scale. E. Trunk dorsolateral scale. F. Trunk dorsal scale. G. Terminal dorsal scale. H. Furcal ventral three-lobed scales. I. Furcal ventral oblong scales.	Fig. 11. Scales of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. A. Head lateral scales. B. Head dorsal scales. C. Neck dorsal scales. D. Trunk lateral scale. E. Trunk dorsolateral scale. F. Trunk dorsal scale. G. Terminal dorsal scale. H. Furcal ventral three-lobed scales. I. Furcal ventral oblong scales.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFF94FFFF50A3DF9B2DA4F9C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195266/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195266	Fig. 18. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov. A. Dorsal overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B–C. Details showing the distribution of head and trunk scales. D–E. Head and trunk scales, the schematic drawing of the scale base is shown above that of spined scales. F. Lateral view of a trunk spined scale. G. Dorsal furcal scales. Scale bar = 30 µm.	Fig. 18. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov. A. Dorsal overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B–C. Details showing the distribution of head and trunk scales. D–E. Head and trunk scales, the schematic drawing of the scale base is shown above that of spined scales. F. Lateral view of a trunk spined scale. G. Dorsal furcal scales. Scale bar = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFEEFFFB509DDBA6287DF836.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195322/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195322	Fig. 37. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) arcanus sp. nov. A. Dorsal overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B–C. Dorsal and lateral views of a head scale. D. Dorsal view of a neck scale. E–F. Lateral and dorsal views of a trunk scale. G. Detail showing the mouth region. H. Internal morphology. Scale bars = 30 µm.	Fig. 37. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) arcanus sp. nov. A. Dorsal overview showing the scale and spine pattern. B–C. Dorsal and lateral views of a head scale. D. Dorsal view of a neck scale. E–F. Lateral and dorsal views of a trunk scale. G. Detail showing the mouth region. H. Internal morphology. Scale bars = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFEEFFFB509DDBA6287DF836.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195326/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195326	Fig. 38. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) arcanus sp. nov., holotype (CU-FNS-29-09-20/HO), differential interference contrast. A. Dorsal trunk scales and spines. Arrows mark lateral denticles. B. Body overview. C. Head scales. D. Adhesive tubes curved underneath trunk. E. Mouth and boomeranglike hypostomial plate. Scale bars: A, D = 10 µm; B = 30 µm; C, E = 2 µm.	Fig. 38. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) arcanus sp. nov., holotype (CU-FNS-29-09-20/HO), differential interference contrast. A. Dorsal trunk scales and spines. Arrows mark lateral denticles. B. Body overview. C. Head scales. D. Adhesive tubes curved underneath trunk. E. Mouth and boomeranglike hypostomial plate. Scale bars: A, D = 10 µm; B = 30 µm; C, E = 2 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFEEFFFB509DDBA6287DF836.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195236/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195236	Fig. 7. Secondary structure of the first two domains of the 5.8‒28S rRNA molecule of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. Diagnostic molecular autapomorphies are marked by red arrows. The reference 28S secondary structure map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen ex E.C.Hansen (inset) is from http://apollo.chemistry.gatech.edu/RibosomeGallery (Petrov et al. 2014).	Fig. 7. Secondary structure of the first two domains of the 5.8‒28S rRNA molecule of Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov. Diagnostic molecular autapomorphies are marked by red arrows. The reference 28S secondary structure map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen ex E.C.Hansen (inset) is from http://apollo.chemistry.gatech.edu/RibosomeGallery (Petrov et al. 2014).	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFEEFFFB509DDBA6287DF836.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195250/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195250	Fig. 12. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., holotype (CU-FNS-11-09-19/HO), differential interference contrast. A‒B. Optical sections showing the general body organization. C. Lateral overview. Arrows in (B) and (C) mark the lateral denticle of spines. Scale bars = 30 µm.	Fig. 12. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., holotype (CU-FNS-11-09-19/HO), differential interference contrast. A‒B. Optical sections showing the general body organization. C. Lateral overview. Arrows in (B) and (C) mark the lateral denticle of spines. Scale bars = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFEEFFFB509DDBA6287DF836.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195270/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195270	Fig. 19. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov. A. Ventral overview showing the scale and ciliary pattern. B. V-shaped scales without keels. C. Bowl-shaped scales without keels. D. Detail of the ventral posterior body region. E. Internal morphology. F. Narrowly obovate keeled scale. G. Fusiform keeled scale. H. Oblong spined scale. Scale bars: A, E = 30 µm; D = 10 µm.	Fig. 19. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov. A. Ventral overview showing the scale and ciliary pattern. B. V-shaped scales without keels. C. Bowl-shaped scales without keels. D. Detail of the ventral posterior body region. E. Internal morphology. F. Narrowly obovate keeled scale. G. Fusiform keeled scale. H. Oblong spined scale. Scale bars: A, E = 30 µm; D = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFEBFFF9509DDC362A25FC97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195242/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195242	Fig. 9. Phylogenetic subtree based on 18S, 28S, and COI, showing the systematic positions of the nine new species within the Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster. Arrows mark the same node in the subtree and the inset phylogram. The whole tree is presented in Fig. 8. The Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster is highlighted in the inset phylogram. ML bootstrap values and posterior probabilities were mapped onto the best ML tree.	Fig. 9. Phylogenetic subtree based on 18S, 28S, and COI, showing the systematic positions of the nine new species within the Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster. Arrows mark the same node in the subtree and the inset phylogram. The whole tree is presented in Fig. 8. The Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster is highlighted in the inset phylogram. ML bootstrap values and posterior probabilities were mapped onto the best ML tree.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFEBFFF9509DDC362A25FC97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195238/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195238	Fig. 8. Phylogenetic tree based on 18S, 28S, and COI sequences, showing the systematic positions of the Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster (arrow). This clade is collapsed in the three, highlighted in the inset phylogram, and presented in detail in Fig. 9. ML bootstrap values and posterior probabilities were mapped onto the best ML tree.	Fig. 8. Phylogenetic tree based on 18S, 28S, and COI sequences, showing the systematic positions of the Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) cluster (arrow). This clade is collapsed in the three, highlighted in the inset phylogram, and presented in detail in Fig. 9. ML bootstrap values and posterior probabilities were mapped onto the best ML tree.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFEBFFF9509DDC362A25FC97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195250/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195250	Fig. 12. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., holotype (CU-FNS-11-09-19/HO), differential interference contrast. A‒B. Optical sections showing the general body organization. C. Lateral overview. Arrows in (B) and (C) mark the lateral denticle of spines. Scale bars = 30 µm.	Fig. 12. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) mirabilis sp. nov., holotype (CU-FNS-11-09-19/HO), differential interference contrast. A‒B. Optical sections showing the general body organization. C. Lateral overview. Arrows in (B) and (C) mark the lateral denticle of spines. Scale bars = 30 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
03D72F3EFFEBFFF9509DDC362A25FC97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7195272/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7195272	Fig. 20. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast.A. Paratype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-3/PA-2). B–C. Holotype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-1/HO). A. Overview showing the general body organization. Asterisks mark the beginning of the ventral ciliary bands. B‒C. Surface views, showing the head and trunk scale patterns. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; B = 5 µm; C = 10 µm.	Fig. 20. Chaetonotus (Hystricochaetonotus) optabilis sp. nov., differential interference contrast.A. Paratype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-3/PA-2). B–C. Holotype (CU-FNS-05-03-20-1/HO). A. Overview showing the general body organization. Asterisks mark the beginning of the ventral ciliary bands. B‒C. Surface views, showing the head and trunk scale patterns. Scale bars: A = 30 µm; B = 5 µm; C = 10 µm.	2022-10-11	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter		Zenodo	biologists	Križanová, Františka Rataj;Vďačný, Peter			
