identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03B13109FFB2912BFF5F0FEBFE7C0396.text	03B13109FFB2912BFF5F0FEBFE7C0396.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ayapana amygdalina (Lam.) King & Robinson 1970	<div><p>1. Ayapana amygdalina (Lam.) King &amp; Robinson (1970: 211).</p> <p>Eupatorium amygdalinum Lamarck (1786: 408).</p> <p>Lectotype (designated here):— PERU. Accurate location not indicated, October 1736, J. de Jussieu s.n. (P00662867 [digital image!]; isolectotypes P00662866 [digital image!], P00662868 [digital image!]).</p> <p>Lamarck (1786) described Eupatorium amygdalinum based on a material collected in Peru by Joseph de Jussieu; however, he did not specify which collection served as the basis for the protologue. In the herbarium of the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (P), three species samples collected by Joseph de Jussieu and incorporated from the Herbarium of Antoine Laurent de Jussieu are deposited under the catalog number “8393”. Later, King &amp; Robinson (1970) proposed a new combination for the species to Ayapana amygdalina; however, they did not propose any typification for the basionym. In accordance with the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN), after analyzing the images of the specimens available in the herbarium of Paris (P), we designate J. de Jussieu s.n. (P00662866; Figure 1) as a lectotype, since it is associated with a label with the annotation “ Eupatorium amygdalinum Lam. dict.”, which also includes indistinct and legible spelling, the origin of the specimen as being from Peru, as well that it is from the herbarium of Joseph de Jussieu. The two other specimens, J. de Jussieu s.n. (P00662867, P00662868) are treated as isolectotypes.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B13109FFB2912BFF5F0FEBFE7C0396	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Rebouças, Natanael Costa;Giacomin, Leandro Lacerda;Roque, Nádia;Bünger, Mariana De Oliveira	Rebouças, Natanael Costa, Giacomin, Leandro Lacerda, Roque, Nádia, Bünger, Mariana De Oliveira (2022): Typifications in Eupatorieae (Asteraceae). Phytotaxa 570 (3): 289-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.570.3.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.570.3.4
03B13109FFB2912BFF5F0C2BFDF2047A.text	03B13109FFB2912BFF5F0C2BFDF2047A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Barrosoa betoniciformis (DC.) King & Robinson 1971	<div><p>2. Barrosoa betoniciformis (DC.) King &amp; Robinson (1971: 27).</p> <p>Conoclinium betoniciforme Candolle (1836: 135).</p> <p>Lectotype (designated here):— BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro, accurate location not indicated, 1834, P.W. Lund 211 (G00494203 [digital image!]).</p> <p>Candolle (1836) described Conoclinium betoniciforme based on the collection of naturalist Peter Wilhelm Lund; however, he did not specify which material he was referring to. In the herbarium of the Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de Genève (G) there are two type specimens collected by P.W. Lund, with different collector numbers (s.n. and 211) and dates (1832 and 1834). So, these collections are not duplicates and should be treated as syntypes. Subsequently, King &amp; Robinson (1971) described Barrosoa R.M. King &amp; H. Rob. and proposed the new combination Barrosoa betoniciformis but did not indicate any typifications for the basionym. Due to this, we designate as lectotype P.W. Lund 211 (G00494203, Figure 2), given the material’s state of preservation, according to Art. 9.11 of the ICN. The material P.W. Lund s.n. (G 00494002) is treated as a residual syntype. An isolectotype and other syntype are possibly located in the Natural History Museum of Denmark herbarium (C), where most collections of P.W. Lund are housed, but these materials were not accessed.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B13109FFB2912BFF5F0C2BFDF2047A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Rebouças, Natanael Costa;Giacomin, Leandro Lacerda;Roque, Nádia;Bünger, Mariana De Oliveira	Rebouças, Natanael Costa, Giacomin, Leandro Lacerda, Roque, Nádia, Bünger, Mariana De Oliveira (2022): Typifications in Eupatorieae (Asteraceae). Phytotaxa 570 (3): 289-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.570.3.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.570.3.4
03B13109FFB2912BFF5F0A47FC4506F3.text	03B13109FFB2912BFF5F0A47FC4506F3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Dissothrix imbricata (Gardner) Robinson 1906	<div><p>3. Dissothrix imbricata (Gardner) Robinson (1906: 35).</p> <p>Stevia imbricata Gardner (1846: 458). Dissothrix gardneri Gray (1851: 223), nom. illeg. superfl.</p> <p>Lectotype (designated here):— BRAZIL. Província Piauí, May 1839, G. Gardner 2211 (K000054172 [digital image!]; isolectotype K000054173, specimen on the left [digital image!]).</p> <p>Gardner (1846) described Stevia imbricata based on two syntypes from Gardner collections: 1744, collected in the “province of Ceará ”, and 2211, coming from the “province of Piauí ”. In the herbarium of the Royal Botanic Kew Gardens (K), three specimens belonging to these collections are deposited, which are mounted on only two sheets: one sheet associated with the number 2211 (K000054172) and another sheet containing two samples with the numbers 1744 and 2211 assigned to different specimens (K000054173 and K00054174, respectively). Afterwards, Gray (1851) described Dissothrix Gray (1851: 223) and a new species, Dissothrix gardneri, using the same materials cited by George Gardner to describe Stevia imbricata, citing the latter as a synonym of D. gardneri, being, therefore, a superfluous illegitimate name (according to Art. 52 of the ICN).</p> <p>Later, Robinson (1906) proposed a new combination, Dissothrix imbricata (Gardner) B.L. Rob.; however, did not indicate any type specimen of the basionym. Therefore, among the collections analyzed, we designate G. Gardner 2211 (K000054172, Figure 3) as a lectotype, considering that this specimen is in good condition, with the original Gardner label, and on a sheet with a single specimen associated. The material K000054173 (left portion of the card) constitutes an isolectotype and K000054174 is a remaining syntype.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B13109FFB2912BFF5F0A47FC4506F3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Rebouças, Natanael Costa;Giacomin, Leandro Lacerda;Roque, Nádia;Bünger, Mariana De Oliveira	Rebouças, Natanael Costa, Giacomin, Leandro Lacerda, Roque, Nádia, Bünger, Mariana De Oliveira (2022): Typifications in Eupatorieae (Asteraceae). Phytotaxa 570 (3): 289-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.570.3.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.570.3.4
