taxonID	type	description	language	source
72DCADF6ADD0518392D61CC1C8C8F0B3.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Male mandible without a notch between the basal and preapical teeth; pronotal carina usually forming obtuse or rounded angle laterally.	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
5688E17F1115536B8210F5901DAA7D6D.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Female clypeus with a narrow apical margin; labial palpus with four segments; male antenna hooked apically; female vertex with a single fovea; anterior face of the pronotum without distinct foveae; pretegular carina present; tegula broad, without deep large punctures, protruding posteriorly adjoining the parategula but not surpassing it; second submarginal cell of the forewing with acute basal angle; axillary fossa relatively broad, not slit-like; propodeum with a transverse carina between the dorsal and posterior surfaces; propodeal valvula mono-lamellate; propodeal orifice broadly rounded dorsally; T 1 not petiolate, somewhat narrower than T 2, without a transverse carina; both T 1 and T 2 without an apical lamella.	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
68B9F676DDA054E28163F88EF6020312.taxon	description	Figs 1 A-H, 2 A-F, 3 A, F	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
68B9F676DDA054E28163F88EF6020312.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Israel, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, China (van der Vecht and Fischer 1972; Kurzenko 1977; Oehlke 2012).	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
4BE7D6FF71D9574DB2901CB4B9C489DA.taxon	description	Figs 3 B, G, 4 A-H	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
4BE7D6FF71D9574DB2901CB4B9C489DA.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. The new species can be easily recognized among other representatives of the subgenus Pseudepipona Deuterepipona by completely transparent wings, coarse punctures on clypeus, a shallow apical emargination of the clypeus in the male, a small F 11 in the male, a saddle-shaped ventral lobe of the male aedeagus, and a whitish pattern (see Key).	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
4BE7D6FF71D9574DB2901CB4B9C489DA.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length (from head to apical margin of tergum 2) 6.5 - 7.0 mm; fore wing length 6.0 mm. Head about 1.1 x as wide as long in frontal view. Clypeus as wide as long; its apical emargination very shallow, about 0.2 x as deep as wide, taking 1 / 4 of clypeal width, apical teeth blunt. Cephalic fovea shallow but well developed, as broad as distance between lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocellus and occiput 1.1 x as distance between lateral ocelli. Pronotal carina well developed, forming blunt angle at anterolateral corner of pronotum. Epicnemial carina developed. Scutellum and metanotum convex. Propodeum with distinct carina between shelf and concavity, carina forming rectangularly rounded projection in lateral view. Propodeal valvula mono-lamellate, evenly rounded. T 1 1.8 x as wide as long in dorsal view, bluntly roundly angled in lateral view. T 2 evenly convex in lateral view. S 2 in lateral view rather flattened, roundly elevated at base, in ventral view with distinct longitudinal furrow at base. Clypeus with coarse dense punctures, interstices approximately equal to puncture diameter, shining. Frons and vertex with punctures coarser than those on clypeus, interstices usually less than puncture diameter; punctures on gena slightly smaller and sparser. Pronotum dorsally with punctures similar to those on vertex; lateral part of pronotum with denser and smaller punctures and dull interstices with distinct microsculpture. Sculpture on scutum coarser than that on dorsal surface of pronotum, interstices usually less than puncture diameter. Tegula nearly smooth, with few minute punctures. Punctures on mesepisternum, scutellum, and metanotum similar in size to those on dorsal surface of pronotum, interstices usually approximately equal to puncture diameter except whitish parts where they exceed puncture diameter. Mesepimeron with coarse punctures forming longitudinal rows. Metapleuron dull, weakly longitudinally rugose. Dorsal and dorsolateral surfaces of propodeum with shallow irregular, indistinct but coarse punctures similar in size to those on metanotum. Lateral surface of propodeum longitudinally rugose, more distinctly than metapleuron, without punctures. Propodeal concavity transversally rugose. T 1 and T 2 with dense coarse punctures similar to those on frons and vertex, interstices usually less than puncture diameter except apical bands where punctures are smaller. T 3 - T 5 with sparser and smaller punctures. T 6 mostly with microsculpture only. Sculpture of S 1 similar to that of lateral part of T 1. Basal part of S 2 before transverse furrow dull, with microsculpture only. Sculpture of distal part of S 2 after transverse furrow and S 3 - S 6 as that of corresponding terga but interstices larger and microsculpture more distinct. Setation weakly developed. Frons, vertex, dorsal surface of pronotum, scutum, and tarsi with sparse setae less in length than diameter of scapus at base. Posterior margin of gena with very short setae equal in length to puncture diameter on gena. Most other parts of body bare or with very minute setae. Basal color black. The following parts whitish: spot on frons between antennal sockets, anterior and lower faces of scapus, small band along inner margin of eye from clypeus to ocular sinus, small spot on gena, large lateral spots on dorsal surface of pronotum, spot on dorsal mesepisternum, tegula and parategula, bands on scutellum and metanotum, lateral spots on propodeum, front leg from middle of femur onwards, middle leg from apex of femur onwards, hind leg from tibia onwards, apical bands on T 1 and T 2 enlarged laterally, apical bands on T 3 - T 4, spot on T 6, apical band on S 2, apical spots laterally on S 3. Ventral side of flagellum ferruginous. Wings transparent, without infuscation. Male. Body length (from head to apical margin of T 2) 5.5 mm; fore wing length 5.0 mm. Structure as in female but clypeus with apical emargination taking about 1 / 3 of clypeal width. F 11 rather acute, straight, and small, narrowing towards apex, hardly reaching apical margin of F 8. Cuspis without the dorsal process typical of some species in the nominotypical subgenus (see Fateryga 2022). Aedeagus as in Fig. 3 B, G, median expansion comparatively narrow, ventral lobe in lateral view saddle-shaped, with distinctly emarginated ventral side. Sculpture similar to that in female but punctures on clypeus shallower. T 6 and S 6 punctate similarly to previous segments. T 7 and S 7 + 8 mostly with microsculpture only. Setae as in female. Coloration mostly as in female but mandible, labrum, and clypeus whitish-yellow, spot on frons and band along inner margin of eye larger, entire scapus and ventral side of pedicel whitish-yellow, all legs whitish-yellow from femur; whitish spots on dorsal mesepisternum and propodeum reduced. Entire F 10 and F 11 ferruginous. T 7 and S 7 + 8 black.	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
4BE7D6FF71D9574DB2901CB4B9C489DA.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The new species is named after the Soviet entomologist Georg Kostylev, also known as Yuriy A. Kostylev (1889 - 1942), in recognition of his great contribution to the systematics of Central Asian Vespidae.	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
4BE7D6FF71D9574DB2901CB4B9C489DA.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan (Kyzylorda Province).	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
CA226C01164F50D7B4E06CD7D868D3C3.taxon	description	Fig. 5 A-E	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
CA226C01164F50D7B4E06CD7D868D3C3.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. The new species can be easily recognized among other representatives of the subgenus Pseudepipona Deuterepipona by an obsolete epicnemial carina, the transverse carina of the propodeum indistinct at center, the absence of a longitudinal furrow at the base of S 2, a fine punctation of the clypeus with a distinct microsculpture, and an orange pattern (see Key).	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
CA226C01164F50D7B4E06CD7D868D3C3.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length (from head to apical margin of tergum 2) 6.0 mm; fore wing length 5.5 mm. Head about 1.1 x as wide as long in frontal view. Clypeus about 1.1 x as wide as long in frontal view, its apical margin nearly truncated, taking nearly 1 / 3 of clypeal width, apical teeth blunt. Cephalic fovea shallow and weakly developed, less broad than distance between lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocellus and occiput nearly 1.3 x as distance between lateral ocelli. Pronotal carina forming small blunt angle at anterolateral corner of pronotum. Epicnemial carina obsolete. Scutellum and metanotum convex. Propodeum with carina between shelf and concavity indistinct at center; laterally this carina forming acute projection. Propodeal valvula mono-lamellate, rounded apically. T 1 2.0 x as wide as long in dorsal view, rather evenly rounded in lateral view. T 2 evenly convex in lateral view. S 2 in lateral view convex, evenly rounded, in ventral view without longitudinal furrow at base. Clypeus dull, with small and sparse shallow punctures, interstices significantly exceeding puncture diameter, with microsculpture. Frons and vertex with deep dense punctures, interstices reaching puncture diameter; punctures on gena slightly smaller and sparser. Pronotum dorsally with punctures similar to those on gena; lateral part of pronotum with sparse shallow punctures and dull interstices with distinct microsculpture. Sculpture on scutum coarser than that on dorsal surface of pronotum, similar to that on frons and vertex or somewhat sparser, interstices with evident micropunctures. Tegula nearly smooth, with few minute punctures. Dorsal mesepisternum dull, sparsely punctate and longitudinally rugose. Ventral mesepisternum, scutellum, and metanotum with sparse punctures; interstices shining, reaching several puncture diameters. Mesepimeron, metapleuron, and lateral surface of propodeum longitudinally rugose, dull. Dorsal and dorsolateral surfaces of propodeum and propodeal concavity dull, indistinctly transversally rugose. T 1 - T 5 with sparse small punctures similar to those on clypeus but much deeper, interstices reaching several puncture diameters, with distinct microsculpture. T 6 mostly with microsculpture only. S 1 with dense coarse punctures, interstices less than puncture diameter. Basal part of S 2 before transverse furrow dull, with microsculpture only. Sculpture of distal part of S 2 after transverse furrow and S 3 - S 6 mostly as that of corresponding terga. Frons and vertex with somewhat hooked or wavy setae reaching in length diameter of scapus at apex. Dorsal surface of pronotum, propleuron, and legs with shorter and mostly straight setae. Posterior margin of gena with very short setae reaching in length diameter of first labial palpomere at base. Most other parts of body bare or with very minute setae. Basal color black. The following parts orange: clypeus, spot on frons between antennal sockets, anterior and lower faces of scapus, small spot on gena, most part of pronotum, spot on dorsal mesepisternum, tegula and parategula, bands on scutellum and metanotum, small lateral spots on propodeum, legs from middle of femur onwards, apical bands on T 1 and T 2 enlarged laterally, apical band on T 3, apical spot at center of T 4 and T 5, apical spots laterally on S 2. Mandible and ventral side of pedicel and flagellum ferruginous. Wings strongly fuscous. Male. Unknown.	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
CA226C01164F50D7B4E06CD7D868D3C3.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The new species is named after the Soviet and Russian entomologist Nikolay V. Kurzenko, the collector of the holotype, in recognition of his great contribution to the systematics of the eumenine wasps of the USSR; this species was recognized by him but not described.	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
CA226C01164F50D7B4E06CD7D868D3C3.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Kazakhstan (Karaganda Province).	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
F24EB572185755D7B84E298DD2EA6121.taxon	description	Figs 3 C, H, 6 A-H	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
F24EB572185755D7B84E298DD2EA6121.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. The new species can be easily recognized among other representatives of the subgenus Pseudepipona Deuterepipona by the pronotal carina rounded laterally, a nearly indistinct cephalic fovea in the female, a robust F 11 in the male, and a triangle-shaped ventral lobe of the male aedeagus (see Key).	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
F24EB572185755D7B84E298DD2EA6121.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length (from head to apical margin of tergum 2) 6.0 - 7.0 mm; fore wing length 5.5 - 6.0 mm. Head about 1.1 x as wide as long in frontal view. Clypeus as wide as long; its apical emargination shallow, about 0.2 x as deep as wide, taking 1 / 4 of clypeal width, apical teeth blunt. Cephalic fovea nearly indistinct; distance between lateral ocellus and occiput 1.2 x as distance between lateral ocelli. Pronotal carina weakly developed, pronotum rounded at anterolateral corner. Epicnemial carina developed. Scutellum convex, slightly impressed at center; metanotum convex. Propodeum with distinct carina between shelf and concavity, carina forming rectangularly rounded projection in lateral view. Propodeal valvula mono-lamellate, evenly rounded. T 1 2.0 x as wide as long in dorsal view, bluntly roundly angled in lateral view. T 2 evenly convex in lateral view. S 2 in lateral view rather flattened, roundly elevated at base, in ventral view with weakly developed longitudinal furrow at base. Clypeus with sparse fine punctures, interstices exceeding puncture diameter, shining. Frons and vertex with punctures much denser and coarser than those on clypeus, interstices reaching puncture diameter; punctures on gena slightly smaller and sparser. Pronotum dorsally with punctures similar to those on gena; lateral part of pronotum rather longitudinally wrinkled, with interstices dull due to microsculpture. Sculpture on scutum coarser than that on frons and vertex, interstices reaching puncture diameter; punctures sometimes form longitudinal rows, especially posteriorly. Tegula nearly smooth, with few minute punctures. Punctures on mesepisternum similar in size and density to those on scutum. Punctures on scutellum similar in size to those on dorsal surface of pronotum but interstices larger, reach several puncture diameters, shining; metanotum with similar punctures in proximal half and nearly smooth distally. Mesepimeron with coarse punctures similar in size to those on mesepisternum but interstices narrower, sharp. Metapleuron longitudinally rugose, with microsculpture but slightly shining. Dorsal and dorsolateral surfaces of propodeum with shallow irregular, indistinct but coarse punctures. Lateral surface of propodeum longitudinally rugose, dull. Propodeal concavity transversally rugose. T 1 and T 2 with deep sparse punctures, larger on black parts and smaller on pale yellow parts, interstices reaching several puncture diameter, with distinct microsculpture. T 3 - T 5 with somewhat sparser and smaller punctures. T 6 mostly with microsculpture only. Sculpture of S 1 similar to that of lateral part of T 1. Basal part of S 2 before transverse furrow dull, with microsculpture only. Sculpture of distal part of S 2 after transverse furrow similar to that of T 2 but interstices larger and more shining. Sculpture of S 3 - S 6 as that of corresponding terga but interstices larger and microsculpture more distinct. Frons and vertex with sparse pale setae equal in length to diameter of scapus at apex. Mesosoma dorsally with setae equal in length to approximately 2 / 3 of those on frons. Posterior margin of gena, tarsi, S 1 and S 2 with setae approximately two times shorter than those on dorsal mesosoma. Most other parts of body bare or with very short appressed setae. Basal color black. The following parts pale yellow: distal part of clypeus (but clypeus entirely black in one specimen), spot on frons between antennal sockets, anterior and lower faces of scapus, small band along inner margins of eye from clypeus to ocular sinus, small spot on gena, most part of dorsal surface of pronotum, spot on dorsal mesepisternum, tegula and sometimes parategula (black in two specimens), bands on scutellum and metanotum, spot on dorsolateral surface of propodeum, front leg from middle of femur onwards, middle leg from apex of femur onwards, hind leg from tibia onwards, apical band on T 1 enlarged laterally, apical bands on T 2 - T 4, spot on T 6, apical bands on S 1 - S 4, apical spot on S 5. Ventral side of pedicel and flagellum ferruginous. Wings slightly but evidently fuscous, particularly in marginal cell. Male. Body length (from head to apical margin of T 2) 6.0 mm; fore wing length 5.5 mm. Structure as in female but clypeus 1.2 x as wide as long, with apical emargination 0.3 x as deep as wide, taking distinctly more than 1 / 4 of clypeal width. F 11 robust, slightly curved, and rather long, slightly narrowing towards apex, fully reaching apical margin of F 8. Cuspis without the dorsal process typical of some species in the nominotypical subgenus (see Fateryga 2022). Aedeagus as in Fig. 6 C, H, median expansion broad, ventral lobe in lateral view triangle-shaped, gradually narrowing towards apex. Sculpture similar to that in female but punctures on clypeus finer and sparser. T 6 and S 6 punctate similarly to previous segments. T 7 and S 7 + 8 mostly with microsculpture only. Setae as in female. Coloration mostly as in female but mandible, labrum, clypeus, entire scapus and ventral side of pedicel pale yellow, spot on frons and band along inner margin of eye larger, all legs pale yellow from femur; spots on dorsal mesepisternum and propodeum reduced. Entire F 10 and F 11 ferruginous. T 7 with pale yellow spot, S 7 + 8 black.	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
F24EB572185755D7B84E298DD2EA6121.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The new species is named after the Soviet entomologist Vladimir B. Popov (1902 - 1960), a corresponding member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, in recognition of his great contribution to the knowledge of Central Asian Hymenoptera.	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
F24EB572185755D7B84E298DD2EA6121.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Turkmenistan.	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
A5717F5DFA775B5B876B00313CA4E146.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Saudi Arabia, Iran (Bluethgen and Gusenleitner 1970).	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
A6B82F071BCE50C3837C3BFC70EB423C.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Turkey, Israel (Gusenleitner 2013).	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
43DFB4162030582EA928381D1CF1367A.taxon	description	Figs 3 D, I, 7 A-I, 8 A-D	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
43DFB4162030582EA928381D1CF1367A.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Russia,? Azerbaijan, Iran, Kazakhstan (Dvorak and Castro 2007; Gusenleitner 2013; Fateryga et al. 2017).	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
323E1942CA5D510B89D34013AD7FAA54.taxon	description	Figs 3 E, J, 9 A-H	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
323E1942CA5D510B89D34013AD7FAA54.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. The new species can be easily recognized among other representatives of the subgenus Pseudepipona Deuterepipona by the ferruginous coloration of the basal part of the flagellum dorsally, a very extensive yellow pattern of the body, acute apical teeth of the clypeus in the male, a long and slender F 11 in the male, and a small ventral lobe of the male aedeagus (see Key).	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
323E1942CA5D510B89D34013AD7FAA54.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length (from head to apical margin of tergum 2) 6.0 mm; fore wing length 5.5 mm. Head about 1.1 x as wide as long in frontal view. Clypeus as wide as long; its apical emargination shallow, about 0.2 x as deep as wide, taking somewhat less than 1 / 4 of clypeal width, apical teeth rather rectangular. Cephalic fovea shallow and weakly developed, as broad as distance between lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocellus and occiput 1.4 x as distance between lateral ocelli. Pronotal carina well developed, forming blunt angle at anterolateral corner of pronotum. Epicnemial carina developed. Scutellum and metanotum convex. Propodeum with distinct carina between shelf and concavity, carina forming rectangularly rounded projection in lateral view. Propodeal valvula mono-lamellate, rounded apically. T 1 1.5 x as wide as long in dorsal view, bluntly roundly angled in lateral view. T 2 evenly convex in lateral view. S 2 in lateral view rather flattened, slightly roundly elevated at base, in ventral view with weakly developed longitudinal furrow at base. Clypeus with sparse punctures sometimes forming longitudinal rows, interstices exceeding puncture diameter, rather dull. Frons and vertex with punctures coarser than those on clypeus, interstices reaching puncture diameter; punctures on gena slightly smaller and sparser. Pronotum dorsally with punctures similar to those on frons and vertex; lateral part of pronotum with dense indistinct sculpture, dull. Sculpture on scutum coarser than that on dorsal surface of pronotum, interstices usually less than puncture diameter. Tegula nearly smooth, with few minute punctures. Punctures on dorsal mesepisternum, scutellum, and metanotum similar in size to those on dorsal surface of pronotum, interstices usually approximately equal to puncture diameter. Ventral mesepisternum punctate rather similarly to scutum. Mesepimeron with coarse punctures forming longitudinal rows. Metapleuron and lateral portion of propodeum dull, longitudinally rugose. Dorsal and dorsolateral surfaces of propodeum with shallow irregular and coarse reticulate sculpture, interstices much less than puncture diameter. Propodeal concavity transversally rugose. T 1 and T 2 with dense coarse punctures, interstices reaching puncture diameter, with distinct microsculpture; punctures become smaller and sparser towards apical parts of terga. T 3 - T 5 with sparser and smaller punctures. T 6 mostly with microsculpture only. S 1 with shallow irregular and coarse reticulate sculpture. Basal part of S 2 before transverse furrow dull, with microsculpture only. Sculpture of distal part of S 2 after transverse furrow and S 3 - S 6 as that of corresponding terga. Setation weakly developed. Frons and posterior margin of gena with sparse setae reaching in length 1 / 2 diameter of scapus at base. Most other parts of body bare or with very minute setae. Black with extensive yellow pattern: clypeus, large spot on frons, entire scapus, band along inner margin of eye from clypeus to ocular sinus, large spot on gena, nearly entire pronotum, large spot on dorsal mesepisternum, spot on ventral mesepisternum, tegula and parategula, nearly entire scutellum and metanotum, lateral spots on propodeum, all legs, nearly entire T 1 - T 6 except basal black areas, entire S 1 and S 2, nearly entire S 3 - S 6 except basal black areas. Mandible, labrum, ventral side of flagellum, entire pedicel, and entire F 1 - F 3 ferruginous. Wings fuscous, particularly in marginal cell. Male. Body length (from head to apical margin of T 2) 5.0 - 6.0 mm; fore wing length 5.0 - 5.5 mm. Structure as in female but clypeus with apical emargination 0.5 x as deep as wide, taking more than 1 / 4 of clypeal width, apical teeth acute. F 11 very slender, slightly curved, and long, narrowing towards apex, reaching middle of F 8. Cuspis without the dorsal process typical of some species in the nominotypical subgenus (see Fateryga 2022). Aedeagus as in Fig. 3 E, J, median expansion broad, ventral lobe in lateral view trapezoidal and comparatively small. Sculpture similar to that in female but punctures on clypeus not forming longitudinal rows. T 6 and S 6 punctate similarly to previous segments. T 7 and S 7 + 8 mostly with microsculpture only. Setae as in female. Coloration mostly as in female but mandible and labrum yellow. Spot on ventral mesepisternum reduced. Entire F 10 and F 11 ferruginous but F 3 darkened dorsally. T 7 mostly yellow; S 7 + 8 black.	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
323E1942CA5D510B89D34013AD7FAA54.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The new species is named after the Soviet and Kazakh entomologist Vladimir L. Kazenas, the collector of the type series.	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
323E1942CA5D510B89D34013AD7FAA54.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Kazakhstan (Karaganda Province).	en	Fateryga, Alexander V., Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. (2022): Contribution to the taxonomy of the Pseudepipona subgenus Deuterepipona Bluethgen, 1951 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) from Central Asia, with the description of four new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 101-123, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90092
