taxonID	type	description	language	source
1233F2463819FF8EFF0583ECDE1FFE16.taxon	description	Figs 1 – 3; Table S 1 urn: lsid: zoobank. org: act: 8 F 2 B 7918 - 68 FA- 4 E 55 - A 6 AF- 3 FA 010 E 31 E 00	en	Sivalingam, Pavarne Shantti, Kupriyanova, Elena K., Quek, Zheng Bin Randolph, Yap, Nicholas Wei Liang, Teo, Serena Lay Ming (2022): The nomenclatural and taxonomic status of Pomatoleios kraussii var. manilensis Pillai, 1965. Zootaxa 5200 (4): 396-400, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5200.4.8
1233F2463819FF8EFF0583ECDE1FFE16.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. Holotype: NHM 1965.33.34, collected from and among farmed oysters in Binakayan, Cavite, Manila Bay, Philippines; Fig. 3. Paratypes: Nine specimens (6 “ de-tubed ”; 3 preserved within tubes). NHM 1965.33.35 (1 spec.), NHM 1965.33.36 (1 spec.), NHM 1965.33.37 (1 spec.), NHM 1965.33.38 (1 spec.), NHM 1965.33.39 (1 spec.), NHM 1965.33.40 (1 spec.), NHM 1965.33.41 (1 spec.), NHM 1965.33.42 (1 spec.), NHM 1965.33.43 (1 spec.); all material collected from and among farmed oysters in Binakayan, Cavite, Manila Bay, Philippines.	en	Sivalingam, Pavarne Shantti, Kupriyanova, Elena K., Quek, Zheng Bin Randolph, Yap, Nicholas Wei Liang, Teo, Serena Lay Ming (2022): The nomenclatural and taxonomic status of Pomatoleios kraussii var. manilensis Pillai, 1965. Zootaxa 5200 (4): 396-400, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5200.4.8
1233F2463819FF8EFF0583ECDE1FFE16.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Tube white (Figs 1 A – B), sub-trapezoidal in cross-section (Figs 1 C – D). Radiolar crown attached to two lobes, with 12 – 17 radioles arranged in a circle in each lobe. Operculum funnel-shaped. Opercular endplate calcareous, circular, with deep concavity (Figs 2 A – B, Fig. 3 C), except in one specimen with a shallower endplate protruding slightly from opercular ampulla (Fig. 2 C, red arrow) with indistinct, concentric ovoid-shaped markings (Fig. 2 D). Collar chaetae absent, except in one specimen which had collar chaetae on both sides of body. Abdomen with 38 – 61 chaetigers, between one to three achaetous segments anteriorly.	en	Sivalingam, Pavarne Shantti, Kupriyanova, Elena K., Quek, Zheng Bin Randolph, Yap, Nicholas Wei Liang, Teo, Serena Lay Ming (2022): The nomenclatural and taxonomic status of Pomatoleios kraussii var. manilensis Pillai, 1965. Zootaxa 5200 (4): 396-400, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5200.4.8
1233F2463819FF8EFF0583ECDE1FFE16.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific epithet “ manilensis ” was originally coined by Pillai (1965) in his unavailable varietal name, as a reference to Manila Bay, where the species was found.	en	Sivalingam, Pavarne Shantti, Kupriyanova, Elena K., Quek, Zheng Bin Randolph, Yap, Nicholas Wei Liang, Teo, Serena Lay Ming (2022): The nomenclatural and taxonomic status of Pomatoleios kraussii var. manilensis Pillai, 1965. Zootaxa 5200 (4): 396-400, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5200.4.8
1233F2463819FF8EFF0583ECDE1FFE16.taxon	discussion	Remarks. We refer readers to Sivananthan et al. (2021) for a full description of S. manilensis sp. nov.. The reported count of seven specimens in Sivananthan et al. (2021) excluded three specimens that were preserved within their tubes. Details of holotype and paratypes of S. manilensis sp. nov. are provided in Supplementary Information, Table S 1.	en	Sivalingam, Pavarne Shantti, Kupriyanova, Elena K., Quek, Zheng Bin Randolph, Yap, Nicholas Wei Liang, Teo, Serena Lay Ming (2022): The nomenclatural and taxonomic status of Pomatoleios kraussii var. manilensis Pillai, 1965. Zootaxa 5200 (4): 396-400, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5200.4.8
