taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
039E87BD7D5D8028FC9BF9CFFA22FC9C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7270448/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7270448	FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic tree obtained from RAxML analysis of a combined ITS, LSU and TEF1-α sequence data. Bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 50%, MP equal to or greater than 60% and Bayesian posterior probabilities equal to or greater than 0.90 PP are indicated at the nodes as ML/MP/PP. The ex-type and ex-epitype strains are in black bold and the new isolates obtained in this study are in red. The tree is rooted to Cytospora elaeagni (CFCC 89633) and C. gigaspora (CFCC 89634).	FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic tree obtained from RAxML analysis of a combined ITS, LSU and TEF1-α sequence data. Bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 50%, MP equal to or greater than 60% and Bayesian posterior probabilities equal to or greater than 0.90 PP are indicated at the nodes as ML/MP/PP. The ex-type and ex-epitype strains are in black bold and the new isolates obtained in this study are in red. The tree is rooted to Cytospora elaeagni (CFCC 89633) and C. gigaspora (CFCC 89634).	2022-11-01	Monkai, Jutamart;Phookamsak, Rungtiwa;Xu, Sheng;Xu, Jianchu;Mortimer, Peter E.;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Lumyong, Saisamorn		Zenodo	biologists	Monkai, Jutamart;Phookamsak, Rungtiwa;Xu, Sheng;Xu, Jianchu;Mortimer, Peter E.;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Lumyong, Saisamorn			
039E87BD7D5E8027FC9BFCB1FF71FC86.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7270454/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7270454	FIGURE 3. Pseudophaeocytostroma bambusicola (KUN-HKAS 124569, holotype) a Conidiomata on host substrate b Section of a conidioma c Ostiole d Conidiomatal wall e Conidiophores f–h Conidiogenous cells and conidia i Paraphyses j–n Conidia o–p Colonies on PDA after 7 days (o from above, p from below). Scale bars: a = 500 μm, b = 200 μm, c = 100 μm, d = 20 μm, e–h = 10 μm, i = 20 μm, j–n = 10 μm.	FIGURE 3. Pseudophaeocytostroma bambusicola (KUN-HKAS 124569, holotype) a Conidiomata on host substrate b Section of a conidioma c Ostiole d Conidiomatal wall e Conidiophores f–h Conidiogenous cells and conidia i Paraphyses j–n Conidia o–p Colonies on PDA after 7 days (o from above, p from below). Scale bars: a = 500 μm, b = 200 μm, c = 100 μm, d = 20 μm, e–h = 10 μm, i = 20 μm, j–n = 10 μm.	2022-11-01	Monkai, Jutamart;Phookamsak, Rungtiwa;Xu, Sheng;Xu, Jianchu;Mortimer, Peter E.;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Lumyong, Saisamorn		Zenodo	biologists	Monkai, Jutamart;Phookamsak, Rungtiwa;Xu, Sheng;Xu, Jianchu;Mortimer, Peter E.;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Lumyong, Saisamorn			
039E87BD7D5E8027FC9BFCB1FF71FC86.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7270448/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7270448	FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic tree obtained from RAxML analysis of a combined ITS, LSU and TEF1-α sequence data. Bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 50%, MP equal to or greater than 60% and Bayesian posterior probabilities equal to or greater than 0.90 PP are indicated at the nodes as ML/MP/PP. The ex-type and ex-epitype strains are in black bold and the new isolates obtained in this study are in red. The tree is rooted to Cytospora elaeagni (CFCC 89633) and C. gigaspora (CFCC 89634).	FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic tree obtained from RAxML analysis of a combined ITS, LSU and TEF1-α sequence data. Bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 50%, MP equal to or greater than 60% and Bayesian posterior probabilities equal to or greater than 0.90 PP are indicated at the nodes as ML/MP/PP. The ex-type and ex-epitype strains are in black bold and the new isolates obtained in this study are in red. The tree is rooted to Cytospora elaeagni (CFCC 89633) and C. gigaspora (CFCC 89634).	2022-11-01	Monkai, Jutamart;Phookamsak, Rungtiwa;Xu, Sheng;Xu, Jianchu;Mortimer, Peter E.;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Lumyong, Saisamorn		Zenodo	biologists	Monkai, Jutamart;Phookamsak, Rungtiwa;Xu, Sheng;Xu, Jianchu;Mortimer, Peter E.;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Lumyong, Saisamorn			
039E87BD7D5E8027FC9BFCB1FF71FC86.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7270452/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7270452	FIGURE 2. Results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of Pseudophaeocytostroma bambusicola and closely related species using both LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. PHI test results (Φw) <0.05 indicate significant recombination within the dataset. New species described in this study is indicated in red.	FIGURE 2. Results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of Pseudophaeocytostroma bambusicola and closely related species using both LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. PHI test results (Φw) <0.05 indicate significant recombination within the dataset. New species described in this study is indicated in red.	2022-11-01	Monkai, Jutamart;Phookamsak, Rungtiwa;Xu, Sheng;Xu, Jianchu;Mortimer, Peter E.;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Lumyong, Saisamorn		Zenodo	biologists	Monkai, Jutamart;Phookamsak, Rungtiwa;Xu, Sheng;Xu, Jianchu;Mortimer, Peter E.;Karunarathna, Samantha C.;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Lumyong, Saisamorn			
