taxonID	type	description	language	source
03828790500FFFBBFF440549FD340FEF.taxon	type_taxon	Type species: Mazarredia (Mazarredia) gemella Bolívar, 1887, designated by Rehn (1904) Composition and distribution. Including the herein presented taxonomic acts, the genus consists of three subgenera with 49 species altogether. The genus is widely distributed in South and South East Asia. Notes. The complete literature regarding this genus is not listed as it is extensive; only the examined material is listed. The genus consists of many species, most of which were described in the last two decades without making the types available on the OSF website (Cigliano et al. 2022). At the very least, the genus should be reviewed to elucidate the relationship between its species. Historically (Günther 1939), the genus has been populated by species belonging to other genera. This could still be a problem, which should be resolved by a detailed examination of the species, especially those described recently.	en	Kasalo, Niko (2022): Metamazarredia is Rosacris is Mazarredia (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae) - a longawaited sequel to a taxonomic dilemma. Zootaxa 5200 (2): 495-500, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5200.5.7
03828790500FFFBBFF4403FEFD4B09F6.taxon	type_taxon	Type species: Metamazarredia fuscipes (Stål, 1877), by original designation = Mazarredia (Rosacris) fuscipes comb. nov. Notes. In his revision of Metrodorinae, Günther (1939) overlooked some publications, leading him to define a genus that is here found to be synonymous with an older genus, Bolívar’s (1887) Rosacris stat. nov., herein regarded as a subgenus of Mazarredia. According to ICZN (1999), the older name has priority. A detailed justification of this act is presented under the subgenus Rosacris stat. nov.	en	Kasalo, Niko (2022): Metamazarredia is Rosacris is Mazarredia (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae) - a longawaited sequel to a taxonomic dilemma. Zootaxa 5200 (2): 495-500, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5200.5.7
03828790500FFFB8FF440720FA340CAC.taxon	type_taxon	Type species: Rosacris antennata syn. nov. Bolívar, 1931, by original monotypy = Mazarredia (Rosacris) fuscipes comb. nov. Justification of synonymization. Rosacris antennata syn. nov., the only species of that genus, was found to be synonymous with Metamazarredia fuscipes. The name Rosacris has priority, but the specific epithet “ antennata ” does not as it is younger than “ fuscipes ”. For justification of this synonymy, see under Mazarredia (Rosacris) fuscipes comb. nov. as well as Discussion. Composition and distribution. Including the herein presented taxonomic acts, the subgenus consists of five species: Mazarredia (Rosacris) atypa (Bolívar, 1887) comb. rev., Mazarredia (Rosacris) borneensis (Günther, 1939) comb. nov., Mazarredia (Rosacris) fuscipes comb. nov., Mazarredia (Rosacris) lauta (Bolívar, 1887) comb. rev., and Mazarredia (Rosacris) sobria (Walker, 1871) comb. nov. All of the species are distributed in the Philippines except M. (R.) borneensis comb. nov., which is endemic to Borneo. The distinction between subgenera Mazarredia and Rosacris stat. nov. At the time of Günther’s (1939) revision, the genus Mazarredia was full of species that did not belong to it. Among other acts, to bring order, he described the genus Metamazarredia syn. nov., now considered synonymous with the subgenus Rosacris stat. nov., which is characterized by (i) the vertex visibly wider than a compound eye, (ii) distinct medial and lateral carinae of the vertex, with the latter converging in the anterior part, (iii) the vertex not protruding in front of the eyes, bearing distinct fossulae, (iv) a strongly protruding frontal costa and facial carinae, with the bifurcation of the frontal costa at around the middle level of the height of the compound eyes (v) the top margin of the antennal groove at the bottom level of a compound eye, (vi) the fourth, fifth, and sixth penultimate antennal segments broadened, (vii) the pronotum slightly depressed behind the shoulders, (viii) median carina of the pronotum wavy, i. e. slightly raised, in the anterior part, (ix) the first tarsal segment with blunt pulvilli, a little shorter than the third, (x) hind tibia slightly widened distally. Broadened terminal maxillary palps are also mentioned, but this feature is difficult to see in most photographs. When only the type specimens of the aforementioned (sub) genera are compared, they differ in the following characters (numbered as above): (i) the vertex of M. (R.) fuscipes comb. nov. is two times wider than an eye, while in M. (M.) gemella it is as wide as an eye, (vi) the aforementioned antennal segments are (per the original description) compressed in M. (R.) fuscipes comb. nov., while the antennae are filiform in M. (M.) gemella, (vii) the pronotum is depressed in both types but less so in M. (R.) fuscipes comb. nov., (viii) the median carina of the pronotum in M. (M.) gemella is straight, and in M. (R.) fuscipes comb. nov. is wavy in the anterior part, (ix) both genera have blunt pulvilli, but the first segment in M. (R.) fuscipes comb. nov. is a little shorter than the third, while in M. (M.) gemella they are equally long, (x) the hind tibiae of M. (M.) gemella are not visible in the available photographs, but see below. When the rest of the species within those subgenera are examined, some of the mentioned characters are painted in a different light. Brief notes on their diagnostic value are listed here (numbered as above): (i) The width of the vertex is a consistent character, except for Mazarredia sobria comb. nov., herein transferred to the subgenus Rosacris stat. nov. and is referred to as Mazarredia (Rosacris) sobria comb. nov. (vi) According to the original descriptions, M. (R.) fuscipes comb. nov. and M. (R.) lauta comb. rev. have some antennal segments widened. Günther (1939) did not see the the antennae of M. (R.) atypa comb. rev. and M. (R.) borneensis comb. nov. as the holotypes lack them. M. (R.) borneensis comb. nov. does, have widened antennal segments (Skejo pers. comm.), and this feature in M. (R.) atypa comb. rev. and M. (R.) sobria comb. nov. remains unknown. It could be proven to be taxonomically viable at the subgeneric or generic level when whole specimens of the problematic species are found. (vii) In M. (M.) gemella the pronotum is unusually depressed; this feature does not differ significantly between the other species of the two subgenera. (viii) The anterior elevation of the median carina is mostly a consistent difference between the subgenera, especially with M. (R.) sobria comb. nov. transferred to the subgenus Rosacris, but M. (M.) consocia and Mazarredia (Mazarredia) cervina (Walker, 1871) remain notable exceptions. (ix) The holotype of M. (R.) fuscipes comb. nov. has an unusually short first tarsal segment; the rest of the specimens have the first and the third tarsal segments equally long, and this feature does not correlate with the subgenera. (x) Species within both subgenera have hind tibiae widened distally, so this is not a valuable character for separating them at that level. Notes. Based on (i) and (viii), M. (R.) sobria comb. nov. is transferred to the subgenus Rosacris. With this, the width of the vertex becomes the only reliable character that separates the subgenera Rosacris and Mazarredia, with others being variably informative due to the lack of information or not being constrained to a specific character set.	en	Kasalo, Niko (2022): Metamazarredia is Rosacris is Mazarredia (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae) - a longawaited sequel to a taxonomic dilemma. Zootaxa 5200 (2): 495-500, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5200.5.7
03828790500AFFBEFF4401E7FE090960.taxon	materials_examined	Type material: female holotype deposited in the Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet (NHRS), Stockholm, Sweden Type locality: Philippines Justification of synonymy. The holotype and both recorded specimens of Rosacris antennata syn. nov. are nymphs (Skejo 2016). All available specimens exhibit typical nymphal morphology, i. e. they lack antegenicular teeth, their pronota are short with compresso-elevated median carinae, and they are wingless (Skejo et al. 2018). This excludes some important diagnostic characters, but there is still enough evidence to suggest that those individuals represent nymphs of M. (R.) fuscipes comb. nov. The general colouration of the legs, the position of the bifurcation of the frontal costa, deep fossulae, and the width of the vertex undoubtedly place the nymphs in the subgenus Rosacris stat. nov.. The shape of the vertex in dorsal view (strongly triangular) and the shape of the anterior margin of the vertex (slightly narrowed anteriorly, blunt), along with the shape of the eyes (distinctly narrowed in the dorsal part in frontal view) and the prozonal carinae of the pronotum distinctly curving inwards dorsally fit exactly with M. (R.) fuscipes comb. nov. Additionally, a specimen of M. (R.) fuscipes comb. nov. is known from Mount Isarog, the type locality of R. antennata syn. nov. (Skejo 2016; Cigliano et al. 2022). A summary of this species’ nomenclature and photographs of the nymph hitherto assigned to R. antennata syn. nov. can be seen in Fig. 1.	en	Kasalo, Niko (2022): Metamazarredia is Rosacris is Mazarredia (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae) - a longawaited sequel to a taxonomic dilemma. Zootaxa 5200 (2): 495-500, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5200.5.7
03828790500AFFBEFF4402B3FC690EC5.taxon	materials_examined	Type material: female holotype deposited at The Natural History Museum (BMNH), United Kingdom, London Type locality: Philippines This species is herein transferred from the subgenus Mazarredia to the subgenus Rosacris stat. nov. For justification of this act, see under the subgenus Rosacris stat. nov. section.	en	Kasalo, Niko (2022): Metamazarredia is Rosacris is Mazarredia (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae) - a longawaited sequel to a taxonomic dilemma. Zootaxa 5200 (2): 495-500, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5200.5.7
