taxonID	type	description	language	source
03EF878CEC7AFFDCFF464F9EFAF3F81E.taxon	discussion	Notes: Howell did not cite a specific collection of Suksdorf’s or a date, and Suksdorf collected frequently in ‘ Falcon Valley’, the swampy plateau near the southeastern base of Mt. Adams in northwestern Klickitat County, Washington (Weber 1944). We chose the specimen at ORE, which Howell would have worked from, as lectotype, which includes the exact wording found in the protologue, has been generally considered the type based on annotations, and is in good condition. When Brand reduced N. suksdorfii to a subspecies under N. minima, he noted the specimen he worked from was at the Berlin Herbarium. This specimen is presumably destroyed, but a duplicate at M bears an annotation label by Brand in 1905 using his then unpublished combination. The specimens at ORE, M, and NY have printed labels with no collection number, whereas those at NDG and UC are handwritten and include “ 167 ” before the species name, which is likely a referencing number rather than Suksdorf collection number. Navarretia pilosifaucis was considered a synonym of N. intertexta by Mason (1951) and of N. propinqua by Cronquist (1959), but has been largely ignored otherwise. Curiously, the holotype of N. pilosifaucis belongs in N. leucocephala subsp. suksdorfii as defined here, having white pollen and elongated, flattened, flexuous outer bracts that exclude it from both N. intertexta and N. propinqua. However, the single cited paratype, collected a year later in the same general vicinity (WS 48906! [barcode WS 001942]), is clearly N. intertexta and may have been the source of Mason’s and Cronquist’s determination.	en	Johnson, Leigh A., Gowen, David (2022): Restoring the original taxonomic concept for Navarretia minima (Polemoniaceae): a revised synonymy and new combination. Phytotaxa 576 (1): 101-112, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.576.1.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
