taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03A95E063E12FFBFFD9603270057BA18.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428101/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428101	Fig. 2. Ammothella dirbergi sp. nov. A–F, I–L. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-83. G–H. Paratype, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1091. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. D. Chelifore. E. Chela bud. F. Palp. G. Oviger. H. Oviger strigilis. I. Oviger. J. Oviger strigilis. K. Third leg. L. Tarsus and propodus of third leg.	Fig. 2. Ammothella dirbergi sp. nov. A–F, I–L. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-83. G–H. Paratype, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1091. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. D. Chelifore. E. Chela bud. F. Palp. G. Oviger. H. Oviger strigilis. I. Oviger. J. Oviger strigilis. K. Third leg. L. Tarsus and propodus of third leg.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E0EFFA3FD8906080048BD8C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428103/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428103	Fig. 3. Ammothella krappi sp. nov. A–G, J–K. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1132. H–I. Paratype, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1113. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. D. Chelifore. E. Third leg. F. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. G. Palp. H. Oviger. I. Oviger strigilis. J. Oviger. K. Oviger strigilis.	Fig. 3. Ammothella krappi sp. nov. A–G, J–K. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1132. H–I. Paratype, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1113. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. D. Chelifore. E. Third leg. F. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. G. Palp. H. Oviger. I. Oviger strigilis. J. Oviger. K. Oviger strigilis.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E0DFFA5FDA001200079BD8C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428105/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428105	Fig. 4. Ammothella aff. krappi sp. nov. A–B, D–I, L–M. ♂, MNHN-IU-2019-3400. C. Juvenile, MNHN-IU-2016-834. J–K. ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1316. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. D. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. E. Fourth leg. F. Tarsus and propodus of fourth leg. G. Palp. H. Oviger. I. Oviger strigilis. J. Oviger. K. Oviger strigilis. L. Chelifore. M. Close-up of chela bud.	Fig. 4. Ammothella aff. krappi sp. nov. A–B, D–I, L–M. ♂, MNHN-IU-2019-3400. C. Juvenile, MNHN-IU-2016-834. J–K. ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1316. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. D. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. E. Fourth leg. F. Tarsus and propodus of fourth leg. G. Palp. H. Oviger. I. Oviger strigilis. J. Oviger. K. Oviger strigilis. L. Chelifore. M. Close-up of chela bud.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E07FFABFD910327006BB9AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428109/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428109	Fig. 5. Comparison between Tanystylum boucheti sp. nov. (A–H) and T. hummelincki Stock, 1954 (I– J). A–H. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1074. I–J. ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1063. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp. D. Third leg. E. Cement gland tube. F. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. G. Oviger. H. Oviger strigilis. I. Body, dorsal view. J. Body, lateral view. I and J same scale as A.	Fig. 5. Comparison between Tanystylum boucheti sp. nov. (A–H) and T. hummelincki Stock, 1954 (I– J). A–H. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1074. I–J. ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1063. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp. D. Third leg. E. Cement gland tube. F. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. G. Oviger. H. Oviger strigilis. I. Body, dorsal view. J. Body, lateral view. I and J same scale as A.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E03FFADFDCA032703A0BA72.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428109/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428109	Fig. 5. Comparison between Tanystylum boucheti sp. nov. (A–H) and T. hummelincki Stock, 1954 (I– J). A–H. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1074. I–J. ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1063. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp. D. Third leg. E. Cement gland tube. F. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. G. Oviger. H. Oviger strigilis. I. Body, dorsal view. J. Body, lateral view. I and J same scale as A.	Fig. 5. Comparison between Tanystylum boucheti sp. nov. (A–H) and T. hummelincki Stock, 1954 (I– J). A–H. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1074. I–J. ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1063. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp. D. Third leg. E. Cement gland tube. F. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. G. Oviger. H. Oviger strigilis. I. Body, dorsal view. J. Body, lateral view. I and J same scale as A.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E03FF90FD90075E0048B928.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428111/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428111	Fig. 6. Tanystylum ingrallis sp. nov., holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1055. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp. D. Oviger. E. Oviger strigilis. F. Second leg. G. Tarsus and propodus of second leg. H. Femur of third leg, dorsal view (same scale as F). I. Close-up of distal spur on femur of second leg, and cement gland tube. J. First leg (same scale as F).	Fig. 6. Tanystylum ingrallis sp. nov., holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1055. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp. D. Oviger. E. Oviger strigilis. F. Second leg. G. Tarsus and propodus of second leg. H. Femur of third leg, dorsal view (same scale as F). I. Close-up of distal spur on femur of second leg, and cement gland tube. J. First leg (same scale as F).	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E3BFF98FDB6068F0048BD2B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428115/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428115	Fig. 7. Ascorhynchus iguanarum sp. nov., holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1047. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp. D. Oviger, with close-up of strigilis spines. E. Third leg. F. Tarsus and propodus of third leg.	Fig. 7. Ascorhynchus iguanarum sp. nov., holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1047. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp. D. Oviger, with close-up of strigilis spines. E. Third leg. F. Tarsus and propodus of third leg.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E36FF99FD5904F20048BCFA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428119/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428119	Fig. 8. Ascorhynchus sp. 5, juvenile, MNHN-IU-2016-1039. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp. D. First leg. E. Tarsus and propodus of first leg. F. Chela.	Fig. 8. Ascorhynchus sp. 5, juvenile, MNHN-IU-2016-1039. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp. D. First leg. E. Tarsus and propodus of first leg. F. Chela.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E35FF9FFD7F07FA0079BCA4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428125/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428125	Fig. 9. Comparison between Eurycyde kaiouti sp. nov. (A–J) and E. raphiaster Loman, 1912 (K). A–J. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1129. K. ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-818. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Oviger. D. Oviger strigilis. E. Pointed teeth of oviger strigilis. F. Third leg. G. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. H. Chelifore. I. Chela bud. J. Palp. K. Body, dorsal view (same scale as A).	Fig. 9. Comparison between Eurycyde kaiouti sp. nov. (A–J) and E. raphiaster Loman, 1912 (K). A–J. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1129. K. ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-818. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Oviger. D. Oviger strigilis. E. Pointed teeth of oviger strigilis. F. Third leg. G. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. H. Chelifore. I. Chela bud. J. Palp. K. Body, dorsal view (same scale as A).	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E31FF80FDB006180079BBC4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428125/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428125	Fig. 9. Comparison between Eurycyde kaiouti sp. nov. (A–J) and E. raphiaster Loman, 1912 (K). A–J. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1129. K. ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-818. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Oviger. D. Oviger strigilis. E. Pointed teeth of oviger strigilis. F. Third leg. G. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. H. Chelifore. I. Chela bud. J. Palp. K. Body, dorsal view (same scale as A).	Fig. 9. Comparison between Eurycyde kaiouti sp. nov. (A–J) and E. raphiaster Loman, 1912 (K). A–J. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1129. K. ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-818. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Oviger. D. Oviger strigilis. E. Pointed teeth of oviger strigilis. F. Third leg. G. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. H. Chelifore. I. Chela bud. J. Palp. K. Body, dorsal view (same scale as A).	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E2DFF85FDD1060C0079BD75.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428129/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428129	Fig. 10. Pallenoides cf. amazonicus Stock, 1974, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-866. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Oviger.C. First coxa of third leg, frontal view.D. Proboscis, ventral view.E. Second leg.F. Tarsus and propodus of second leg. G. Oviger. H. Oviger strigilis, with close-up of some compound teeth. I. Chela.	Fig. 10. Pallenoides cf. amazonicus Stock, 1974, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-866. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Oviger.C. First coxa of third leg, frontal view.D. Proboscis, ventral view.E. Second leg.F. Tarsus and propodus of second leg. G. Oviger. H. Oviger strigilis, with close-up of some compound teeth. I. Chela.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E29FF8AFD75075603C0BA25.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428135/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428135	Fig. 11. Nymphon dorlis sp. nov., holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-879. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp. D. Oviger. E. Pointed teeth of oviger. F. Chela. G. Third leg. H. Tarsus and propodus of third leg.	Fig. 11. Nymphon dorlis sp. nov., holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-879. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp. D. Oviger. E. Pointed teeth of oviger. F. Chela. G. Third leg. H. Tarsus and propodus of third leg.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E24FF8EFD8707970048BCFB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428139/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428139	Fig. 12. Nymphon ludovici sp. nov., holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-835. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Ocular tubercle, lateral view.D. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. E. Palp. F. Chelifore, with close-up of two bifid teeth. G. Oviger. H. Strigilis. I. Pointed teeth of strigilis. J. Fourth leg. K. Tarsus and propodus of fourth leg. L. Propodal claws.	Fig. 12. Nymphon ludovici sp. nov., holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-835. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Ocular tubercle, lateral view.D. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. E. Palp. F. Chelifore, with close-up of two bifid teeth. G. Oviger. H. Strigilis. I. Pointed teeth of strigilis. J. Fourth leg. K. Tarsus and propodus of fourth leg. L. Propodal claws.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E24FF8EFD8707970048BCFB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428141/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428141	Fig. 13. Nymphon ludovici sp. nov., paratype, ♀, MNHN-IU-2017-219. Chelifore.	Fig. 13. Nymphon ludovici sp. nov., paratype, ♀, MNHN-IU-2017-219. Chelifore.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E20FFF1FD9E01CD0048BD91.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428143	Fig. 14. Nymphon martinicum sp. nov. A–K. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-889. L–M. Paratype, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1033. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. D. Palp. E. Chelifore. F. Leg. G. Tarsus and propodus. H. Close-up of ventral surface of propodal claws. I. Oviger. J. Oviger strigilis. K. Pointed teeth of oviger strigilis. L. Chela (same scale as E). M. Ocular tubercle, frontal view (same scale as C).	Fig. 14. Nymphon martinicum sp. nov. A–K. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-889. L–M. Paratype, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1033. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. D. Palp. E. Chelifore. F. Leg. G. Tarsus and propodus. H. Close-up of ventral surface of propodal claws. I. Oviger. J. Oviger strigilis. K. Pointed teeth of oviger strigilis. L. Chela (same scale as E). M. Ocular tubercle, frontal view (same scale as C).	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E5FFFF4FD7C01230048BA63.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428147/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428147	Fig. 15. Nymphon timons sp. nov., holotype, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-844. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Fourth leg. D. Tarsus and propodus of fourth leg. E. Chela. F. Palp. G. Oviger. H. Oviger strigilis. I. Compound denticle and terminal claw of strigilis.	Fig. 15. Nymphon timons sp. nov., holotype, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-844. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Fourth leg. D. Tarsus and propodus of fourth leg. E. Chela. F. Palp. G. Oviger. H. Oviger strigilis. I. Compound denticle and terminal claw of strigilis.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E5FFFF4FD7C01230048BA63.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428352/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428352	Fig. 16. Nymphon timons sp. nov., paratype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2021-6623. Oviger.	Fig. 16. Nymphon timons sp. nov., paratype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2021-6623. Oviger.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E5BFFF7FDC907770079BBBF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428159/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428159	Fig. 17. Endeis aff. meridionalis (Böhm, 1879), ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1043. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Oviger. D. Last two oviger articles. E. Third leg.	Fig. 17. Endeis aff. meridionalis (Böhm, 1879), ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1043. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Oviger. D. Last two oviger articles. E. Third leg.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E59FFF9FDBB07380048BA6C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428163/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428163	Fig. 18. Endeis aff. mollis (Carpenter, 1904), ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-565. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Oviger. D. Last two oviger articles. E. Third leg.	Fig. 18. Endeis aff. mollis (Carpenter, 1904), ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-565. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Oviger. D. Last two oviger articles. E. Third leg.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E57FFFBFD2C07590048BEC5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428165/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428165	Fig. 19. Endeis sp. 3. A–E. ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-863. F. ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1203. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Ocular tubercle, lateral view. D. Leg. E. Tarsus and propodus. F. Femur.	Fig. 19. Endeis sp. 3. A–E. ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-863. F. ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1203. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Ocular tubercle, lateral view. D. Leg. E. Tarsus and propodus. F. Femur.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E52FFFDFDD503270369BE97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428169/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428169	Fig. 20. Cement gland pores of Anoplodactylus micros Bourdillon, 1955 and A. bahamensis Child, 1997.	Fig. 20. Cement gland pores of Anoplodactylus micros Bourdillon, 1955 and A. bahamensis Child, 1997.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E51FFE0FDE6032700EDBAEA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428173/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428173	Fig. 21. Anoplodactylus cf. californicus Hall, 1912. A–H. ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-855. I. ♀, MNHN- IU-2016-810. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Proboscis, ventral view (same scale as A). D. Oviger. E. Third leg. F. Cement gland tube. G. Propodus of third leg. H. Chela. I. Cephalon and proboscis, ventral view.	Fig. 21. Anoplodactylus cf. californicus Hall, 1912. A–H. ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-855. I. ♀, MNHN- IU-2016-810. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Proboscis, ventral view (same scale as A). D. Oviger. E. Third leg. F. Cement gland tube. G. Propodus of third leg. H. Chela. I. Cephalon and proboscis, ventral view.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E49FFEAFDC701440079BC71.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428179/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428179	Fig. 22. Comparison of Anoplodactylus madibenthos sp. nov. (A–J) and A. pectinus Hedgpeth, 1948 (K–L). A–J. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1071. K–L. MNHN-IU-2016-1254. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Proboscis in ventral view. C. Body lateral view (same scale as A). D. Oviger. E. Chela. F. Third leg. G. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. H. Cement gland opening. I. First leg. J. Tarsus and propodus of first leg. K. Body, dorsal view. L. Proboscis in ventral view (same scale a A).	Fig. 22. Comparison of Anoplodactylus madibenthos sp. nov. (A–J) and A. pectinus Hedgpeth, 1948 (K–L). A–J. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1071. K–L. MNHN-IU-2016-1254. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Proboscis in ventral view. C. Body lateral view (same scale as A). D. Oviger. E. Chela. F. Third leg. G. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. H. Cement gland opening. I. First leg. J. Tarsus and propodus of first leg. K. Body, dorsal view. L. Proboscis in ventral view (same scale a A).	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E49FFEAFDC701440079BC71.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428181/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428181	Fig. 23. Anoplodactylus madibenthos sp. nov., paratype, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1202. A. First leg. B. Third leg.	Fig. 23. Anoplodactylus madibenthos sp. nov., paratype, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1202. A. First leg. B. Third leg.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E42FFEFFDD501A00079BB6C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428169/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428169	Fig. 20. Cement gland pores of Anoplodactylus micros Bourdillon, 1955 and A. bahamensis Child, 1997.	Fig. 20. Cement gland pores of Anoplodactylus micros Bourdillon, 1955 and A. bahamensis Child, 1997.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E42FFEFFDD501A00079BB6C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428184/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428184	Fig. 24. Anoplodactylus micros Bourdillon, 1955, neotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1325. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Proboscis in ventral view (same scale as A). D. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. E. Oviger. F. Second leg. G. Cement gland opening of second leg. H. Coxa 2 of third leg. I. Tarsus and propodus of second leg. J. Chelifore.	Fig. 24. Anoplodactylus micros Bourdillon, 1955, neotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1325. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Proboscis in ventral view (same scale as A). D. Ocular tubercle, frontal view. E. Oviger. F. Second leg. G. Cement gland opening of second leg. H. Coxa 2 of third leg. I. Tarsus and propodus of second leg. J. Chelifore.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E7EFFD1FDD906D50079BBDD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428179/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428179	Fig. 22. Comparison of Anoplodactylus madibenthos sp. nov. (A–J) and A. pectinus Hedgpeth, 1948 (K–L). A–J. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1071. K–L. MNHN-IU-2016-1254. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Proboscis in ventral view. C. Body lateral view (same scale as A). D. Oviger. E. Chela. F. Third leg. G. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. H. Cement gland opening. I. First leg. J. Tarsus and propodus of first leg. K. Body, dorsal view. L. Proboscis in ventral view (same scale a A).	Fig. 22. Comparison of Anoplodactylus madibenthos sp. nov. (A–J) and A. pectinus Hedgpeth, 1948 (K–L). A–J. Holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1071. K–L. MNHN-IU-2016-1254. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Proboscis in ventral view. C. Body lateral view (same scale as A). D. Oviger. E. Chela. F. Third leg. G. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. H. Cement gland opening. I. First leg. J. Tarsus and propodus of first leg. K. Body, dorsal view. L. Proboscis in ventral view (same scale a A).	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E7AFFD6FD60072A006BBE0C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428189/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428189	Fig. 25. Anoplodactylus sp. 4, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1165. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Fourth leg. D. Tarsus and propodus of fourth leg. E. Chela.	Fig. 25. Anoplodactylus sp. 4, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1165. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Fourth leg. D. Tarsus and propodus of fourth leg. E. Chela.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E78FFD6FD6003B90064BBBA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428193/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428193	Fig. 26. Anoplodactylus sp. 7, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1163. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Proboscis in ventral view (same scale as A). C. Oviger. D. Oviger terminal articles. E. Fourth leg. F. Tarsus and propodus of fourth leg. G. Propodal sole lamina. H. Chela.	Fig. 26. Anoplodactylus sp. 7, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-1163. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Proboscis in ventral view (same scale as A). C. Oviger. D. Oviger terminal articles. E. Fourth leg. F. Tarsus and propodus of fourth leg. G. Propodal sole lamina. H. Chela.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E78FFD9FD6007060048BD5B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428199/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428199	Fig. 27. Anoplodactylus sp. 8, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1060. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Third leg. D. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. E. Chela.	Fig. 27. Anoplodactylus sp. 8, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1060. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Third leg. D. Tarsus and propodus of third leg. E. Chela.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E74FFDCFD9A03FE0195B89A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428201/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428201	Fig. 28. Pycnogonum cesairei sp. nov., holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-10338. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Third leg. D. Oviger. E. Close-up of six terminal segments of oviger.	Fig. 28. Pycnogonum cesairei sp. nov., holotype, ♂, MNHN-IU-2016-10338. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Third leg. D. Oviger. E. Close-up of six terminal segments of oviger.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E73FFDDFDC203260442BA35.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428203/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428203	Fig. 29. Pycnogonum cf. ornans Stock, 1992, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1064. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. First leg. D. Tarsus and propodus of first leg.	Fig. 29. Pycnogonum cf. ornans Stock, 1992, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-1064. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. First leg. D. Tarsus and propodus of first leg.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E73FFC0FDCC079E0064BA3D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428207/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428207	Fig. 30. Pycnogonum cf. pusillum Dohrn, 1881, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-815. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Third leg. D. Tarsus and propodus of third leg.	Fig. 30. Pycnogonum cf. pusillum Dohrn, 1881, ♀, MNHN-IU-2016-815. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Third leg. D. Tarsus and propodus of third leg.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
03A95E063E6FFFC3FDA806100064B895.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7428209/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428209	Fig. 31. Rhynchothorax sidereus sp. nov., holotype, MNHN-IU-2016-817. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp terminal segments, ventral view.D. Third leg. E. Oviger.	Fig. 31. Rhynchothorax sidereus sp. nov., holotype, MNHN-IU-2016-817. A. Body, dorsal view. B. Body, lateral view (same scale as A). C. Palp terminal segments, ventral view.D. Third leg. E. Oviger.	2022-12-12	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure		Zenodo	biologists	Sabroux, Romain;Hassanin, Alexandre;Corbari, Laure			
