taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03DD3329EF7D5844FC0CF9ACC5DC5DA8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814901/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814901	FIG. 1.— Distribution of Hymenochaete sharmae Hembrom, K. Das & A. Parihar, sp. nov., in Rajmahal hills, Jharkhand, India. Map was prepared with the help of ArcGIS installed in Central National Herbarium of Botanical Survey of India, Howrah, India.	FIG. 1.— Distribution of Hymenochaete sharmae Hembrom, K. Das & A. Parihar, sp. nov., in Rajmahal hills, Jharkhand, India. Map was prepared with the help of ArcGIS installed in Central National Herbarium of Botanical Survey of India, Howrah, India.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF7D5844FC0CF9ACC5DC5DA8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7825654/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7825654	FIG. 2. — Phylogram inferred from Maximum Likelihood analysis using raxmlGUI based on nrITS sequences. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain the nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70%) obtained from ML analysis are shown above or below the branches at nodes. The novel species Hymenochaete sharmae Hembrom, K. Das & A. Parihar, sp. nov., (KY929018, MK588836) is shown in bold.	FIG. 2. — Phylogram inferred from Maximum Likelihood analysis using raxmlGUI based on nrITS sequences. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain the nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70%) obtained from ML analysis are shown above or below the branches at nodes. The novel species Hymenochaete sharmae Hembrom, K. Das & A. Parihar, sp. nov., (KY929018, MK588836) is shown in bold.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF7D5844FC0CF9ACC5DC5DA8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814903/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814903	FIG. 3. — Phylogram inferred from maximum likelihood analysis using raxmlGUI based on nrLSU sequences. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain the nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70%) obtained from ML analysis are shown above or below the branches at nodes. The novel species Hymenochaete sharmae Hembrom, K. Das & A. Parihar, sp. nov., (KY929017, MK588753), is shown in bold.	FIG. 3. — Phylogram inferred from maximum likelihood analysis using raxmlGUI based on nrLSU sequences. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain the nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70%) obtained from ML analysis are shown above or below the branches at nodes. The novel species Hymenochaete sharmae Hembrom, K. Das & A. Parihar, sp. nov., (KY929017, MK588753), is shown in bold.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF7D5844FC0CF9ACC5DC5DA8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814905/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814905	FIG. 4. — Hymenochaete sharmae Hembrom, K. Das & A. Parihar, sp. nov., (MEH-70191, holotype), morphological features: A-C, basidiomata in the field; D, margin; E-G, hyphidia; H, cystidioles; I-N, setae; O, basidiospores. Scale bars: C, 50 mm; D, 10 mm; E-O, 10 µm.	FIG. 4. — Hymenochaete sharmae Hembrom, K. Das & A. Parihar, sp. nov., (MEH-70191, holotype), morphological features: A-C, basidiomata in the field; D, margin; E-G, hyphidia; H, cystidioles; I-N, setae; O, basidiospores. Scale bars: C, 50 mm; D, 10 mm; E-O, 10 µm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF7D5844FC0CF9ACC5DC5DA8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814907/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814907	FIG. 5. — Hymenochaete sharmae Hembrom, K. Das & A. Parihar, sp. nov., (MEH-70191, holotype), microscopic features: A, transverse section through basidi- omata showing arrangement of hyphae, setae, basidia, basidioles, cystidioles and hyphidia; B, setae; C, basidiospores; D, hyphidia; E, basidia; F, cystidioles; G, basidioles. Scale bars: A-G, 10 µm.	FIG. 5. — Hymenochaete sharmae Hembrom, K. Das & A. Parihar, sp. nov., (MEH-70191, holotype), microscopic features: A, transverse section through basidi- omata showing arrangement of hyphae, setae, basidia, basidioles, cystidioles and hyphidia; B, setae; C, basidiospores; D, hyphidia; E, basidia; F, cystidioles; G, basidioles. Scale bars: A-G, 10 µm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF745840FC1AFEA6C0955B55.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7825658/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7825658	FIG. 6. — A maximum likelihood (ML) phylogram inferred from raxmlGUI (Silvestro & Michalak 2012) based on nrITS sequences. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain the nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70%) obtained from ML analysis are shown above or below the branches at nodes. Two collections (KD 17-20 and KD 17-46) of the novel Indian species Laccaria indohimalayana K. Das, I. Bera & Vizzini, sp. nov., are shown in bold red with GenBank accession numbers MK584157 and MK575505 respectively.	FIG. 6. — A maximum likelihood (ML) phylogram inferred from raxmlGUI (Silvestro & Michalak 2012) based on nrITS sequences. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain the nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70%) obtained from ML analysis are shown above or below the branches at nodes. Two collections (KD 17-20 and KD 17-46) of the novel Indian species Laccaria indohimalayana K. Das, I. Bera & Vizzini, sp. nov., are shown in bold red with GenBank accession numbers MK584157 and MK575505 respectively.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF745840FC1AFEA6C0955B55.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814909/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814909	FIG. 7. — Laccaria indohimalayana K. Das, I. Bera & Vizzini, sp. nov. (KD 17-20, holotype): A, B, fresh basidiomata in the field and basecamp; C, lamellae; D, E, transverse section through pileipellis; F-H, sterile elements on the face of the lamellae; I, 2- to 4-spored basidia; J, K, sterile elements on the edge of the lamellae; L, transverse section through stipitipellis; M, N, basidiospores under SEM. Scale bars: D-L, 10 µm; M, N, 2 µm.	FIG. 7. — Laccaria indohimalayana K. Das, I. Bera & Vizzini, sp. nov. (KD 17-20, holotype): A, B, fresh basidiomata in the field and basecamp; C, lamellae; D, E, transverse section through pileipellis; F-H, sterile elements on the face of the lamellae; I, 2- to 4-spored basidia; J, K, sterile elements on the edge of the lamellae; L, transverse section through stipitipellis; M, N, basidiospores under SEM. Scale bars: D-L, 10 µm; M, N, 2 µm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF745840FC1AFEA6C0955B55.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814913/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814913	FIG. 8. — Line drawings of Laccaria indohimalayana K. Das, I. Bera & Vizzini, sp. nov. (KD 17-20, holotype): A, basidiospores; B, basidia; C, sterile elements on face of the lamellae; D, sterile elements on edge of lamellae; E, hyphal elements in pileipellis. Scale bars: A-E, 10 µm.	FIG. 8. — Line drawings of Laccaria indohimalayana K. Das, I. Bera & Vizzini, sp. nov. (KD 17-20, holotype): A, basidiospores; B, basidia; C, sterile elements on face of the lamellae; D, sterile elements on edge of lamellae; E, hyphal elements in pileipellis. Scale bars: A-E, 10 µm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF70585FFC15FED7C0875DAF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814915/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814915	FIG. 9. — Original tree generated by Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic analysis, rooted with midpoint. NJ analysis was conducted in MEGA X, using bootstrap method (1000 replicates),p-distance as substitution model,transitions and transversions both included,uniform rates among sites,homogeneous pattern among lineages and pairwise deletion for gaps treatment. The bootstrap proportions higher than 70% are indicated above the nodes. New species are in bold. Sample labels are provided in the order of species name, GenBank accession, and geographical origin. For new species, sample numbers with initials of collectors are provided after GenBank accessions.	FIG. 9. — Original tree generated by Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic analysis, rooted with midpoint. NJ analysis was conducted in MEGA X, using bootstrap method (1000 replicates),p-distance as substitution model,transitions and transversions both included,uniform rates among sites,homogeneous pattern among lineages and pairwise deletion for gaps treatment. The bootstrap proportions higher than 70% are indicated above the nodes. New species are in bold. Sample labels are provided in the order of species name, GenBank accession, and geographical origin. For new species, sample numbers with initials of collectors are provided after GenBank accessions.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF70585FFC15FED7C0875DAF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814917/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814917	FIG. 10. — Basidiocarps:A, Lactarius aurantiobrunneus X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 101912,holotype);B, L.exilis X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 90043);C, L. collybioides X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 76002, holotype);D, L. flaviaquosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104207,holotype); E, L. resinosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104241).	FIG. 10. — Basidiocarps:A, Lactarius aurantiobrunneus X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 101912,holotype);B, L.exilis X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 90043);C, L. collybioides X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 76002, holotype);D, L. flaviaquosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104207,holotype); E, L. resinosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104241).	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF70585FFC15FED7C0875DAF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814919/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814919	FIG. 11. — Lactarius aurantiobrunneus X.H. Wang, sp. nov. (HKAS 101912, holotype): A, basidiospores; B, pleuromacrocystidia; C, lamella edge; D, pileipellis. Scale bars: A, 5 μm; B, 20 μm; C, D, 25 μm.	FIG. 11. — Lactarius aurantiobrunneus X.H. Wang, sp. nov. (HKAS 101912, holotype): A, basidiospores; B, pleuromacrocystidia; C, lamella edge; D, pileipellis. Scale bars: A, 5 μm; B, 20 μm; C, D, 25 μm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF6C585DFF1FFB74C08358B4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814915/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814915	FIG. 9. — Original tree generated by Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic analysis, rooted with midpoint. NJ analysis was conducted in MEGA X, using bootstrap method (1000 replicates),p-distance as substitution model,transitions and transversions both included,uniform rates among sites,homogeneous pattern among lineages and pairwise deletion for gaps treatment. The bootstrap proportions higher than 70% are indicated above the nodes. New species are in bold. Sample labels are provided in the order of species name, GenBank accession, and geographical origin. For new species, sample numbers with initials of collectors are provided after GenBank accessions.	FIG. 9. — Original tree generated by Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic analysis, rooted with midpoint. NJ analysis was conducted in MEGA X, using bootstrap method (1000 replicates),p-distance as substitution model,transitions and transversions both included,uniform rates among sites,homogeneous pattern among lineages and pairwise deletion for gaps treatment. The bootstrap proportions higher than 70% are indicated above the nodes. New species are in bold. Sample labels are provided in the order of species name, GenBank accession, and geographical origin. For new species, sample numbers with initials of collectors are provided after GenBank accessions.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF6C585DFF1FFB74C08358B4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814917/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814917	FIG. 10. — Basidiocarps:A, Lactarius aurantiobrunneus X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 101912,holotype);B, L.exilis X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 90043);C, L. collybioides X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 76002, holotype);D, L. flaviaquosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104207,holotype); E, L. resinosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104241).	FIG. 10. — Basidiocarps:A, Lactarius aurantiobrunneus X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 101912,holotype);B, L.exilis X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 90043);C, L. collybioides X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 76002, holotype);D, L. flaviaquosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104207,holotype); E, L. resinosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104241).	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF6C585DFF1FFB74C08358B4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814921/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814921	FIG. 12. — Lactarius collybioides X.H. Wang, sp. nov. (HKAS 76002, holotype): A, basidiospores; B, pleuromacrocystidia; C, lamella edge; D, pileipellis; E, stipitipellis. Scale bars: A, 5 μm; B, 20 μm; C-E, 25 μm.	FIG. 12. — Lactarius collybioides X.H. Wang, sp. nov. (HKAS 76002, holotype): A, basidiospores; B, pleuromacrocystidia; C, lamella edge; D, pileipellis; E, stipitipellis. Scale bars: A, 5 μm; B, 20 μm; C-E, 25 μm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF6D585BFC42FCD9C7655DAF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814915/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814915	FIG. 9. — Original tree generated by Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic analysis, rooted with midpoint. NJ analysis was conducted in MEGA X, using bootstrap method (1000 replicates),p-distance as substitution model,transitions and transversions both included,uniform rates among sites,homogeneous pattern among lineages and pairwise deletion for gaps treatment. The bootstrap proportions higher than 70% are indicated above the nodes. New species are in bold. Sample labels are provided in the order of species name, GenBank accession, and geographical origin. For new species, sample numbers with initials of collectors are provided after GenBank accessions.	FIG. 9. — Original tree generated by Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic analysis, rooted with midpoint. NJ analysis was conducted in MEGA X, using bootstrap method (1000 replicates),p-distance as substitution model,transitions and transversions both included,uniform rates among sites,homogeneous pattern among lineages and pairwise deletion for gaps treatment. The bootstrap proportions higher than 70% are indicated above the nodes. New species are in bold. Sample labels are provided in the order of species name, GenBank accession, and geographical origin. For new species, sample numbers with initials of collectors are provided after GenBank accessions.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF6D585BFC42FCD9C7655DAF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814917/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814917	FIG. 10. — Basidiocarps:A, Lactarius aurantiobrunneus X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 101912,holotype);B, L.exilis X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 90043);C, L. collybioides X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 76002, holotype);D, L. flaviaquosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104207,holotype); E, L. resinosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104241).	FIG. 10. — Basidiocarps:A, Lactarius aurantiobrunneus X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 101912,holotype);B, L.exilis X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 90043);C, L. collybioides X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 76002, holotype);D, L. flaviaquosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104207,holotype); E, L. resinosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104241).	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF6D585BFC42FCD9C7655DAF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814923/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814923	FIG. 13. — Lactarius exilis X.H. Wang, sp. nov. (HKAS 89954, holotype): A, basidiospores; B, cheilomacrocystidia; C, lamella edge; D, pileipellis. Scale bars: A, 5 μm; B, 20 μm; C, D, 25 μm.	FIG. 13. — Lactarius exilis X.H. Wang, sp. nov. (HKAS 89954, holotype): A, basidiospores; B, cheilomacrocystidia; C, lamella edge; D, pileipellis. Scale bars: A, 5 μm; B, 20 μm; C, D, 25 μm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF6B5859FCBBFB13C54E5ECB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814915/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814915	FIG. 9. — Original tree generated by Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic analysis, rooted with midpoint. NJ analysis was conducted in MEGA X, using bootstrap method (1000 replicates),p-distance as substitution model,transitions and transversions both included,uniform rates among sites,homogeneous pattern among lineages and pairwise deletion for gaps treatment. The bootstrap proportions higher than 70% are indicated above the nodes. New species are in bold. Sample labels are provided in the order of species name, GenBank accession, and geographical origin. For new species, sample numbers with initials of collectors are provided after GenBank accessions.	FIG. 9. — Original tree generated by Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic analysis, rooted with midpoint. NJ analysis was conducted in MEGA X, using bootstrap method (1000 replicates),p-distance as substitution model,transitions and transversions both included,uniform rates among sites,homogeneous pattern among lineages and pairwise deletion for gaps treatment. The bootstrap proportions higher than 70% are indicated above the nodes. New species are in bold. Sample labels are provided in the order of species name, GenBank accession, and geographical origin. For new species, sample numbers with initials of collectors are provided after GenBank accessions.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF6B5859FCBBFB13C54E5ECB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814917/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814917	FIG. 10. — Basidiocarps:A, Lactarius aurantiobrunneus X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 101912,holotype);B, L.exilis X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 90043);C, L. collybioides X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 76002, holotype);D, L. flaviaquosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104207,holotype); E, L. resinosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104241).	FIG. 10. — Basidiocarps:A, Lactarius aurantiobrunneus X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 101912,holotype);B, L.exilis X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 90043);C, L. collybioides X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 76002, holotype);D, L. flaviaquosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104207,holotype); E, L. resinosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104241).	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF6B5859FCBBFB13C54E5ECB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814925/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814925	FIG. 14. — Lactarius flaviaquosus X.H. Wang, sp. nov. (HKAS 104207, holotype): A, basidiospores; B, pleuromacrocystidia; C, lamella edge; D, pileipellis. Scale bars: A, 5 μm; B, 20 μm; C, D, 25 μm.	FIG. 14. — Lactarius flaviaquosus X.H. Wang, sp. nov. (HKAS 104207, holotype): A, basidiospores; B, pleuromacrocystidia; C, lamella edge; D, pileipellis. Scale bars: A, 5 μm; B, 20 μm; C, D, 25 μm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF695856FF0EFB34C084598B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814915/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814915	FIG. 9. — Original tree generated by Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic analysis, rooted with midpoint. NJ analysis was conducted in MEGA X, using bootstrap method (1000 replicates),p-distance as substitution model,transitions and transversions both included,uniform rates among sites,homogeneous pattern among lineages and pairwise deletion for gaps treatment. The bootstrap proportions higher than 70% are indicated above the nodes. New species are in bold. Sample labels are provided in the order of species name, GenBank accession, and geographical origin. For new species, sample numbers with initials of collectors are provided after GenBank accessions.	FIG. 9. — Original tree generated by Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic analysis, rooted with midpoint. NJ analysis was conducted in MEGA X, using bootstrap method (1000 replicates),p-distance as substitution model,transitions and transversions both included,uniform rates among sites,homogeneous pattern among lineages and pairwise deletion for gaps treatment. The bootstrap proportions higher than 70% are indicated above the nodes. New species are in bold. Sample labels are provided in the order of species name, GenBank accession, and geographical origin. For new species, sample numbers with initials of collectors are provided after GenBank accessions.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF695856FF0EFB34C084598B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814917/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814917	FIG. 10. — Basidiocarps:A, Lactarius aurantiobrunneus X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 101912,holotype);B, L.exilis X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 90043);C, L. collybioides X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 76002, holotype);D, L. flaviaquosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104207,holotype); E, L. resinosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104241).	FIG. 10. — Basidiocarps:A, Lactarius aurantiobrunneus X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 101912,holotype);B, L.exilis X.H.Wang,sp.nov.(HKAS 90043);C, L. collybioides X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 76002, holotype);D, L. flaviaquosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104207,holotype); E, L. resinosus X.H. Wang,sp. nov.(HKAS 104241).	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF695856FF0EFB34C084598B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814927/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814927	FIG. 15. — Lactarius resinosus X.H. Wang, sp. nov. (all from HKAS 75984-holotype, except B from HKAS 104241): A, basidiospores; B, lamella edge; C, cheilomacrocystidia; D, pileipellis. Scale bars: A, 5 μm; B, 20 μm; C, D, 25 μm.	FIG. 15. — Lactarius resinosus X.H. Wang, sp. nov. (all from HKAS 75984-holotype, except B from HKAS 104241): A, basidiospores; B, lamella edge; C, cheilomacrocystidia; D, pileipellis. Scale bars: A, 5 μm; B, 20 μm; C, D, 25 μm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF665852FC71FBF4C7A65DA8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814929/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814929	FIG. 16. — Russula capillaris Buyck, sp. nov. (holotype), morphology of fresh basidioma: A, detail of pileus and stipe surface; B, section showing stipe interior; C, details of gills. Photos: B. Buyck.	FIG. 16. — Russula capillaris Buyck, sp. nov. (holotype), morphology of fresh basidioma: A, detail of pileus and stipe surface; B, section showing stipe interior; C, details of gills. Photos: B. Buyck.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF665852FC71FBF4C7A65DA8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814931/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814931	FIG. 17. — Russula capillaris Buyck, sp. nov. (holotype), microscopic features of pileipellis: A, pileocystidia near the trama-subpellis transition with schematic contents in one and indication of refringent conglomerates in both other cells; B, detail of zebroid incrustations observed on most subpellis and context hyphae; C, hyphal extremities of the pileus surface. Scale bar: 10 µm. Drawings: B. Buyck.	FIG. 17. — Russula capillaris Buyck, sp. nov. (holotype), microscopic features of pileipellis: A, pileocystidia near the trama-subpellis transition with schematic contents in one and indication of refringent conglomerates in both other cells; B, detail of zebroid incrustations observed on most subpellis and context hyphae; C, hyphal extremities of the pileus surface. Scale bar: 10 µm. Drawings: B. Buyck.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF665852FC71FBF4C7A65DA8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814933/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814933	FIG. 18. — Russula capillaris Buyck, sp. nov. (holotype), microscopic features of the hymenophore: A, spores; B, basidia and basidiola; C, marginal cells of the gill edge; D, gloeocystidia on gill sides; E, gloeocystidia on gill edge. Cystidial contents are mostly schematic, note also the presence of incrusting material that is easily observed near the base of many pleurogloeocystidia. Scale bar: 10 µm, but only 5 µm for spores. Drawings: B. Buyck.	FIG. 18. — Russula capillaris Buyck, sp. nov. (holotype), microscopic features of the hymenophore: A, spores; B, basidia and basidiola; C, marginal cells of the gill edge; D, gloeocystidia on gill sides; E, gloeocystidia on gill edge. Cystidial contents are mostly schematic, note also the presence of incrusting material that is easily observed near the base of many pleurogloeocystidia. Scale bar: 10 µm, but only 5 µm for spores. Drawings: B. Buyck.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF63586FFEE6FF37C0DA59CB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7825664/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7825664	FIG. 19. — Phylogram generated from Maximum Likelihood approach (ML) in raxmlGUI 1.2 (Stamatakis et al.2008; Silvestro & Michalak 2012) with 1000 bootstrap replicates. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain the nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70%) are shown above or below the branches at nodes. The Indian specimens of Russula clavatohyphata R.P. Bhatt, A. Ghosh, Buyck & K. Das, sp. nov., with GenBank Accession Numbers are shown in bold red.	FIG. 19. — Phylogram generated from Maximum Likelihood approach (ML) in raxmlGUI 1.2 (Stamatakis et al.2008; Silvestro & Michalak 2012) with 1000 bootstrap replicates. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain the nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70%) are shown above or below the branches at nodes. The Indian specimens of Russula clavatohyphata R.P. Bhatt, A. Ghosh, Buyck & K. Das, sp. nov., with GenBank Accession Numbers are shown in bold red.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF63586FFEE6FF37C0DA59CB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814935/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814935	FIG. 20. — Russula clavatohyphata R.P. Bhatt, A. Ghosh, Buyck & K. Das, sp. nov. (AG 15-756): A-D, fresh and sectioned basidiomata in the field and basecamp; E-G, radial section through pileipellis showing elements; H-K, transverse section through lamellae showing pleurocystidia; L, SEM micrograph of basidiospores. Scale bars: A, 50 mm; E-K, 10 µm; L, 3 µm.	FIG. 20. — Russula clavatohyphata R.P. Bhatt, A. Ghosh, Buyck & K. Das, sp. nov. (AG 15-756): A-D, fresh and sectioned basidiomata in the field and basecamp; E-G, radial section through pileipellis showing elements; H-K, transverse section through lamellae showing pleurocystidia; L, SEM micrograph of basidiospores. Scale bars: A, 50 mm; E-K, 10 µm; L, 3 µm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF63586FFEE6FF37C0DA59CB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814937/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814937	FIG. 21. — Russula clavatohyphata R.P. Bhatt, A. Ghosh, Buyck & K. Das, sp. nov. (AG 15-756): A, sectioned basidiome; B, basidiospores; C, hyphal extremities at the pileus surface; D, pleurocystidia; E, cheilocystidia; F,basidia. Scale bars: A, 10 mm; B-F, 10 µm.	FIG. 21. — Russula clavatohyphata R.P. Bhatt, A. Ghosh, Buyck & K. Das, sp. nov. (AG 15-756): A, sectioned basidiome; B, basidiospores; C, hyphal extremities at the pileus surface; D, pleurocystidia; E, cheilocystidia; F,basidia. Scale bars: A, 10 mm; B-F, 10 µm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF5F5869FCA2FB94C6C0596B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814939/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814939	FIG. 22. — Maximum parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of Serpula dendrocalami C.L. Zhao,sp. nov.,and related species in Serpula based on ITS sequences. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) equal to and more than 0.95. The ITS dataset included sequences from 22 fungal specimens representing 8 taxa. The dataset had an aligned length of 905 characters in the dataset, of which 441 characters are constant, 163 are variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 301 are parsimony-informative. Maximum parsimony analysis yielded 1 equally parsimonious tree (TL = 795, CI = 0.815, HI = 0.185,RI = 0.897, RC = 0.731). Best model for ITS estimated and applied in the Bayesian analysis: GTR+I+G, lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; prset statefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1). Bayesian analysis resulted in the same topology with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.001810. Sampled specimens of the new species, Serpula dendrocalami sp. nov., formed a well-supported monophyletic lineage. The EZNA HP Fungal DNA Kit (Omega Biotechnologies Co., Ltd, Kunming) was used to obtain PCR products from dried specimens, according to the manufacturer’s instructions with some modifications. ITS region was amplified with primer pairs ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990). The PCR procedure for ITS was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, 58 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were purified and directly sequenced at Kunming Tsingke Biological Technology Limited Company.All newly generated sequences were deposited at GenBank (Table 1). Branches are lab eled with parsimony bootstrap values (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) equal to and more than 0.95.	FIG. 22. — Maximum parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of Serpula dendrocalami C.L. Zhao,sp. nov.,and related species in Serpula based on ITS sequences. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) equal to and more than 0.95. The ITS dataset included sequences from 22 fungal specimens representing 8 taxa. The dataset had an aligned length of 905 characters in the dataset, of which 441 characters are constant, 163 are variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 301 are parsimony-informative. Maximum parsimony analysis yielded 1 equally parsimonious tree (TL = 795, CI = 0.815, HI = 0.185,RI = 0.897, RC = 0.731). Best model for ITS estimated and applied in the Bayesian analysis: GTR+I+G, lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; prset statefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1). Bayesian analysis resulted in the same topology with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.001810. Sampled specimens of the new species, Serpula dendrocalami sp. nov., formed a well-supported monophyletic lineage. The EZNA HP Fungal DNA Kit (Omega Biotechnologies Co., Ltd, Kunming) was used to obtain PCR products from dried specimens, according to the manufacturer’s instructions with some modifications. ITS region was amplified with primer pairs ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990). The PCR procedure for ITS was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, 58 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were purified and directly sequenced at Kunming Tsingke Biological Technology Limited Company.All newly generated sequences were deposited at GenBank (Table 1). Branches are lab eled with parsimony bootstrap values (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) equal to and more than 0.95.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF5F5869FCA2FB94C6C0596B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814941/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814941	FIG. 23. — Maximum parsimony Strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of Serpula dendrocalami C.L. Zhao,sp. nov.,and related species in Serpula based on nLSU sequences. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) equal to and more than 0.95. The nLSU dataset included sequences from 16 fungal specimens representing 8 species. The dataset had an aligned length of 1411 characters,of which 1158 characters are constant, 69 are variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 184 are parsimony-informative. Maximum parsimony analysis yielded 4 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 321, CI = 0.854, HI = 0.146, RI = 0.947, RC = 0.808). Best model for the nLSU dataset estimated and applied in the Bayesian analysis: GTR+I+G, lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; prset statefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1). Bayesian analysis and ML analysis resulted in a similar topology as MP analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.003841 (BI). This phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that our species was closely related to S. similis (Berk. & Broome) Ginns. Nuclear LSU region was amplified with primer pairs LR0R and LR7 (http://www.biology.duke.edu/fungi/mycolab/primers.htm). The PCR procedure for nLSU was as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 48 °C 1 min and 72 °C for 1.5 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were purified and directly sequenced at Kunming Tsingke Biological Technology Limited Company. All newly generated sequences were deposited at GenBank (Table 1). Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) equal to and more than 0.95.	FIG. 23. — Maximum parsimony Strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of Serpula dendrocalami C.L. Zhao,sp. nov.,and related species in Serpula based on nLSU sequences. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) equal to and more than 0.95. The nLSU dataset included sequences from 16 fungal specimens representing 8 species. The dataset had an aligned length of 1411 characters,of which 1158 characters are constant, 69 are variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 184 are parsimony-informative. Maximum parsimony analysis yielded 4 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 321, CI = 0.854, HI = 0.146, RI = 0.947, RC = 0.808). Best model for the nLSU dataset estimated and applied in the Bayesian analysis: GTR+I+G, lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; prset statefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1). Bayesian analysis and ML analysis resulted in a similar topology as MP analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.003841 (BI). This phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that our species was closely related to S. similis (Berk. & Broome) Ginns. Nuclear LSU region was amplified with primer pairs LR0R and LR7 (http://www.biology.duke.edu/fungi/mycolab/primers.htm). The PCR procedure for nLSU was as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 48 °C 1 min and 72 °C for 1.5 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were purified and directly sequenced at Kunming Tsingke Biological Technology Limited Company. All newly generated sequences were deposited at GenBank (Table 1). Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) equal to and more than 0.95.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF5F5869FCA2FB94C6C0596B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814943/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814943	FIG. 24. — Maximum parsimony Strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of Serpula dendrocalami C.L. Zhao,sp. nov.,and related species in Serpula based on combined ITS+nLSU sequences. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) equal to and more than 0.95. This phylogenetic analysis shows that our new species formed a monophyletic entity with high support, 100% BS, 100% BP and 1.00 BPP,and grouped with S. similis. Sequences from 14 fungal specimens representing 8 species are included. The dataset had an aligned length of 2389 characters, of which 1638 characters are constant, 271 are variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 480 are parsimony-informative. Maximum parsimony analysis yielded 4 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 1144, CI = 0.832, HI = 0.168, RI = 0.891, RC = 0.741). Best model for the ITS+nLSU dataset estimated and applied in the Bayesian analysis: GTR+I+G, lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; prset statefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1). Bayesian analysis and ML analysis resulted in a similar topology as MP analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.001815 (BI). Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) equal to and more than 0.95.	FIG. 24. — Maximum parsimony Strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of Serpula dendrocalami C.L. Zhao,sp. nov.,and related species in Serpula based on combined ITS+nLSU sequences. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) equal to and more than 0.95. This phylogenetic analysis shows that our new species formed a monophyletic entity with high support, 100% BS, 100% BP and 1.00 BPP,and grouped with S. similis. Sequences from 14 fungal specimens representing 8 species are included. The dataset had an aligned length of 2389 characters, of which 1638 characters are constant, 271 are variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 480 are parsimony-informative. Maximum parsimony analysis yielded 4 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 1144, CI = 0.832, HI = 0.168, RI = 0.891, RC = 0.741). Best model for the ITS+nLSU dataset estimated and applied in the Bayesian analysis: GTR+I+G, lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; prset statefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1). Bayesian analysis and ML analysis resulted in a similar topology as MP analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.001815 (BI). Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) equal to and more than 0.95.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF5F5869FCA2FB94C6C0596B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814945/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814945	FIG. 25. — Serpula dendrocalami C.L. Zhao, sp. nov. (holotype): basidiocarps. Scale bars: A, 5 cm; B, 4 cm.	FIG. 25. — Serpula dendrocalami C.L. Zhao, sp. nov. (holotype): basidiocarps. Scale bars: A, 5 cm; B, 4 cm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF5F5869FCA2FB94C6C0596B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814947/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814947	FIG. 26. — Serpula dendrocalami C.L. Zhao, sp. nov. (holotype), microscopic structures: A, basidiospores; B, basidia and basidioles; C, a section of hymenium; D, hyphae from trama; E, hyphae from context; F, skeletal hyphae from context. Scale bars: A, 5 µm; B-F, 10 µm.	FIG. 26. — Serpula dendrocalami C.L. Zhao, sp. nov. (holotype), microscopic structures: A, basidiospores; B, basidia and basidioles; C, a section of hymenium; D, hyphae from trama; E, hyphae from context; F, skeletal hyphae from context. Scale bars: A, 5 µm; B-F, 10 µm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF5F5869FCA2FB94C6C0596B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7825664/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7825664	FIG. 19. — Phylogram generated from Maximum Likelihood approach (ML) in raxmlGUI 1.2 (Stamatakis et al.2008; Silvestro & Michalak 2012) with 1000 bootstrap replicates. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain the nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70%) are shown above or below the branches at nodes. The Indian specimens of Russula clavatohyphata R.P. Bhatt, A. Ghosh, Buyck & K. Das, sp. nov., with GenBank Accession Numbers are shown in bold red.	FIG. 19. — Phylogram generated from Maximum Likelihood approach (ML) in raxmlGUI 1.2 (Stamatakis et al.2008; Silvestro & Michalak 2012) with 1000 bootstrap replicates. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain the nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70%) are shown above or below the branches at nodes. The Indian specimens of Russula clavatohyphata R.P. Bhatt, A. Ghosh, Buyck & K. Das, sp. nov., with GenBank Accession Numbers are shown in bold red.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF5F5869FCA2FB94C6C0596B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814935/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814935	FIG. 20. — Russula clavatohyphata R.P. Bhatt, A. Ghosh, Buyck & K. Das, sp. nov. (AG 15-756): A-D, fresh and sectioned basidiomata in the field and basecamp; E-G, radial section through pileipellis showing elements; H-K, transverse section through lamellae showing pleurocystidia; L, SEM micrograph of basidiospores. Scale bars: A, 50 mm; E-K, 10 µm; L, 3 µm.	FIG. 20. — Russula clavatohyphata R.P. Bhatt, A. Ghosh, Buyck & K. Das, sp. nov. (AG 15-756): A-D, fresh and sectioned basidiomata in the field and basecamp; E-G, radial section through pileipellis showing elements; H-K, transverse section through lamellae showing pleurocystidia; L, SEM micrograph of basidiospores. Scale bars: A, 50 mm; E-K, 10 µm; L, 3 µm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
03DD3329EF5F5869FCA2FB94C6C0596B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7814937/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7814937	FIG. 21. — Russula clavatohyphata R.P. Bhatt, A. Ghosh, Buyck & K. Das, sp. nov. (AG 15-756): A, sectioned basidiome; B, basidiospores; C, hyphal extremities at the pileus surface; D, pleurocystidia; E, cheilocystidia; F,basidia. Scale bars: A, 10 mm; B-F, 10 µm.	FIG. 21. — Russula clavatohyphata R.P. Bhatt, A. Ghosh, Buyck & K. Das, sp. nov. (AG 15-756): A, sectioned basidiome; B, basidiospores; C, hyphal extremities at the pileus surface; D, pleurocystidia; E, cheilocystidia; F,basidia. Scale bars: A, 10 mm; B-F, 10 µm.	2019-08-27	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Xiang-Hua;Das, Kanad;Bera, Ishika;Chen, Yu-Hui;Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad;Ghosh, Aniket;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Hofstetter, Valérie;Parihar, Arvind;Vizzini, Alfredo;Xu, Tai-Min;Zhao, Chang-Lin			
