taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
511E879FFFE2F052A783F8DF1FE5FEBE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828902/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828902	FIG. 1. — Ilytheomyces uncinatus W. Rossi & M. Leonardi, sp. nov. from the type slide. Scale bar: 50 µm.	FIG. 1. — Ilytheomyces uncinatus W. Rossi & M. Leonardi, sp. nov. from the type slide. Scale bar: 50 µm.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFE3F05FA7E9FDBB1E98F9C2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828906/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828906	FIG. 2. — Phylogenetic tree depicting the relationship of Entoloma aurantioalpinum Armada, Vila, Bellanger, Noordel., Krisai & Dima, sp. nov. and Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov. within subgen. Cyanula, clades /Sarcitulum and /Atrocoeruleum, respectively. The new species are highlighted in color rectangles. Newly generated sequences are in boldface. The analysis was inferred from nrDNA ITS sequences using PhyML 3.1 with the following settings: GTR+I+G model of evolution, gamma distribution of 10 rate categories, and tree topology search as SPR. Branch support was tested using the non-parametric, Shimodaira-Hasegawa version of the approximate likelihood-ratio test (SH-aLRT). PhyML SH-aLRT support values (>50) are indicated at the branches. Main clades within the subgenus are compressed. Clitopilus was chosen as outgroup. Bar indicates 0.05 expected change per site per branch.	FIG. 2. — Phylogenetic tree depicting the relationship of Entoloma aurantioalpinum Armada, Vila, Bellanger, Noordel., Krisai & Dima, sp. nov. and Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov. within subgen. Cyanula, clades /Sarcitulum and /Atrocoeruleum, respectively. The new species are highlighted in color rectangles. Newly generated sequences are in boldface. The analysis was inferred from nrDNA ITS sequences using PhyML 3.1 with the following settings: GTR+I+G model of evolution, gamma distribution of 10 rate categories, and tree topology search as SPR. Branch support was tested using the non-parametric, Shimodaira-Hasegawa version of the approximate likelihood-ratio test (SH-aLRT). PhyML SH-aLRT support values (>50) are indicated at the branches. Main clades within the subgenus are compressed. Clitopilus was chosen as outgroup. Bar indicates 0.05 expected change per site per branch.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFE3F05FA7E9FDBB1E98F9C2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828908/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828908	FIG. 3. — Entoloma aurantioalpinum, Armada, Vila, Bellanger, Noordel., Krisai & Dima, sp. nov., habit in situ (from holotype). Photo: F. Armada.	FIG. 3. — Entoloma aurantioalpinum, Armada, Vila, Bellanger, Noordel., Krisai & Dima, sp. nov., habit in situ (from holotype). Photo: F. Armada.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFE3F05FA7E9FDBB1E98F9C2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828916/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828916	FIG. 4. — Microstructures of Entoloma aurantioalpinum Armada, Vila, Bellanger, Noordel., Krisai & Dima, sp. nov.: A, spores; B, lamella edge with cheilocystidia; C, D, elements of pileipellis. Photos: F. Armada. Scale bars: A, B, 10 µm; C, D, 20 µm.	FIG. 4. — Microstructures of Entoloma aurantioalpinum Armada, Vila, Bellanger, Noordel., Krisai & Dima, sp. nov.: A, spores; B, lamella edge with cheilocystidia; C, D, elements of pileipellis. Photos: F. Armada. Scale bars: A, B, 10 µm; C, D, 20 µm.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFEEF05CA79FF99E1836F983.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828906/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828906	FIG. 2. — Phylogenetic tree depicting the relationship of Entoloma aurantioalpinum Armada, Vila, Bellanger, Noordel., Krisai & Dima, sp. nov. and Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov. within subgen. Cyanula, clades /Sarcitulum and /Atrocoeruleum, respectively. The new species are highlighted in color rectangles. Newly generated sequences are in boldface. The analysis was inferred from nrDNA ITS sequences using PhyML 3.1 with the following settings: GTR+I+G model of evolution, gamma distribution of 10 rate categories, and tree topology search as SPR. Branch support was tested using the non-parametric, Shimodaira-Hasegawa version of the approximate likelihood-ratio test (SH-aLRT). PhyML SH-aLRT support values (>50) are indicated at the branches. Main clades within the subgenus are compressed. Clitopilus was chosen as outgroup. Bar indicates 0.05 expected change per site per branch.	FIG. 2. — Phylogenetic tree depicting the relationship of Entoloma aurantioalpinum Armada, Vila, Bellanger, Noordel., Krisai & Dima, sp. nov. and Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov. within subgen. Cyanula, clades /Sarcitulum and /Atrocoeruleum, respectively. The new species are highlighted in color rectangles. Newly generated sequences are in boldface. The analysis was inferred from nrDNA ITS sequences using PhyML 3.1 with the following settings: GTR+I+G model of evolution, gamma distribution of 10 rate categories, and tree topology search as SPR. Branch support was tested using the non-parametric, Shimodaira-Hasegawa version of the approximate likelihood-ratio test (SH-aLRT). PhyML SH-aLRT support values (>50) are indicated at the branches. Main clades within the subgenus are compressed. Clitopilus was chosen as outgroup. Bar indicates 0.05 expected change per site per branch.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFEEF05CA79FF99E1836F983.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828923/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828923	FIG. 5. — Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov., habit in situ (from holotype). Photo: F. Armada.	FIG. 5. — Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov., habit in situ (from holotype). Photo: F. Armada.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFEEF05CA79FF99E1836F983.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828927/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828927	FIG. 6. — Microstructures of Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov.: A, spores; B, lamella edge with basidia and basidioles; C, D, elements of pileipellis. Photos: F. Armada. Scale bars: A, 10 µm; B, D, 20 µm; C, 50 µm.	FIG. 6. — Microstructures of Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov.: A, spores; B, lamella edge with basidia and basidioles; C, D, elements of pileipellis. Photos: F. Armada. Scale bars: A, 10 µm; B, D, 20 µm; C, 50 µm.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFEDF05AA485F89F18CAFEBE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828935/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828935	FIG. 7. — Inocybe hebes Eyssart. & Buyck, sp. nov. Photo: B. Buyck.	FIG. 7. — Inocybe hebes Eyssart. & Buyck, sp. nov. Photo: B. Buyck.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFEDF05AA485F89F18CAFEBE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828937/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828937	FIG. 8. — Inocybe hebes Eyssart. & Buyck, sp. nov. (holotype): A, fruiting bodies; B, basidia; C, cystidia; D, marginal cells of the gill edge; E, spores; F, pileipellis in section (detail). Scale bars: A, 1 cm; B-E, 10 μm. Drawings by G. Eyssartier.	FIG. 8. — Inocybe hebes Eyssart. & Buyck, sp. nov. (holotype): A, fruiting bodies; B, basidia; C, cystidia; D, marginal cells of the gill edge; E, spores; F, pileipellis in section (detail). Scale bars: A, 1 cm; B-E, 10 μm. Drawings by G. Eyssartier.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFEBF058A051FE7B1900FB01.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828941/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828941	FIG. 9. — Inocybe media Eyssart. & Buyck, sp. nov. Photo: B. Buyck.	FIG. 9. — Inocybe media Eyssart. & Buyck, sp. nov. Photo: B. Buyck.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFEBF058A051FE7B1900FB01.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828945/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828945	FIG. 10. — Inocybe media Eyssart. & Buyck, sp. nov. (holotype):A, fruiting bodies; B, basidia;C, cystidia; D, marginal cells of the gill edge; E, spores; F, pileipellis in section (detail). Scale bars: A, 1 cm; B-E, 10 μm. Drawings by G. Eyssartier.	FIG. 10. — Inocybe media Eyssart. & Buyck, sp. nov. (holotype):A, fruiting bodies; B, basidia;C, cystidia; D, marginal cells of the gill edge; E, spores; F, pileipellis in section (detail). Scale bars: A, 1 cm; B-E, 10 μm. Drawings by G. Eyssartier.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFE9F046A517FADE1AB5FD5F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828947/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828947	FIG. 11. — Inocybe leucophaea Eyssart. & Buyck, sp. nov. Photo: B. Buyck.	FIG. 11. — Inocybe leucophaea Eyssart. & Buyck, sp. nov. Photo: B. Buyck.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFE9F046A517FADE1AB5FD5F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828951/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828951	FIG. 12. — Inocybe leucophaea Eyssart. & Buyck, sp. nov. (holotype): A, fruiting bodies; B, basidia; C, cystidia; D, marginal cells of the gill edge; E, spores; F, pileipellis in section (detail). Scale bars: A, 1 cm; B-E, 10 μm. Drawings by G. Eyssartier.	FIG. 12. — Inocybe leucophaea Eyssart. & Buyck, sp. nov. (holotype): A, fruiting bodies; B, basidia; C, cystidia; D, marginal cells of the gill edge; E, spores; F, pileipellis in section (detail). Scale bars: A, 1 cm; B-E, 10 μm. Drawings by G. Eyssartier.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF7F041A51CFC981A3AFD5F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828953/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828953	FIG. 13. — A Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogram inferred from raxmlGUI 2.0 (Edler et al. 2021) on a concatenated dataset of nrITS and nrLSU sequence data of Phaeolus and related genera. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70 %) obtained from ML analysis are shown above or below the branches at nodes. Two collections of our novel Indian species are shown in red and the holotype in bold in the phylogram. See Table 1 for details on used vouchers for the phylogenetic analysis.	FIG. 13. — A Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogram inferred from raxmlGUI 2.0 (Edler et al. 2021) on a concatenated dataset of nrITS and nrLSU sequence data of Phaeolus and related genera. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70 %) obtained from ML analysis are shown above or below the branches at nodes. Two collections of our novel Indian species are shown in red and the holotype in bold in the phylogram. See Table 1 for details on used vouchers for the phylogenetic analysis.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF7F041A51CFC981A3AFD5F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828955/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828955	FIG. 14. — Phaeolus sharmae Hembrom, A. Parihar, K. Das & A. Ghosh, sp. nov. (from holotype): A, B, habitat; C, habit; D, gloeoplerous hyphae; E, G, cystidia; H, basidioles and basidia; I, basidiospores. Scale bars: 10 µm.	FIG. 14. — Phaeolus sharmae Hembrom, A. Parihar, K. Das & A. Ghosh, sp. nov. (from holotype): A, B, habitat; C, habit; D, gloeoplerous hyphae; E, G, cystidia; H, basidioles and basidia; I, basidiospores. Scale bars: 10 µm.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF7F041A51CFC981A3AFD5F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828957/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828957	FIG. 15. — Phaeolus sharmae Hembrom, A. Parihar, K. Das & A. Ghosh, sp. nov. (holotype): A, basidia, basidioles and basidiospores; B, section through trama showing gloeoplerous hyphae, basidia, basidioles and cystidia; C, hyphae from loose upper part of context; D, hyphae adjacent to tube regions of context; E, cystidia; F, hyphae from pileus surface. Scale bars: 10 µm.	FIG. 15. — Phaeolus sharmae Hembrom, A. Parihar, K. Das & A. Ghosh, sp. nov. (holotype): A, basidia, basidioles and basidiospores; B, section through trama showing gloeoplerous hyphae, basidia, basidioles and cystidia; C, hyphae from loose upper part of context; D, hyphae adjacent to tube regions of context; E, cystidia; F, hyphae from pileus surface. Scale bars: 10 µm.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF7F041A51CFC981A3AFD5F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828902/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828902	FIG. 1. — Ilytheomyces uncinatus W. Rossi & M. Leonardi, sp. nov. from the type slide. Scale bar: 50 µm.	FIG. 1. — Ilytheomyces uncinatus W. Rossi & M. Leonardi, sp. nov. from the type slide. Scale bar: 50 µm.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF0F04FA510FCB81F96F823.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828959/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828959	FIG. 16. — Basidiomata of Russula ferruginea Corrales & Vera,sp. nov.A, basidiomata of Russula ferruginea subsp.ferruginea Corrales & Vera, subsp. nov. in the field (HUA Corrales935); B, C, basidiomata of Russula ferruginea subsp. panamensis Corrales & Vera,subsp. nov.in the field (ARIZ Corrales099); D, basidiomata of Russula ferruginea subsp. panamensis Corrales & Vera, subsp. nov. (UCH Anna Giessel A28). Scale bars: 1 cm.	FIG. 16. — Basidiomata of Russula ferruginea Corrales & Vera,sp. nov.A, basidiomata of Russula ferruginea subsp.ferruginea Corrales & Vera, subsp. nov. in the field (HUA Corrales935); B, C, basidiomata of Russula ferruginea subsp. panamensis Corrales & Vera,subsp. nov.in the field (ARIZ Corrales099); D, basidiomata of Russula ferruginea subsp. panamensis Corrales & Vera, subsp. nov. (UCH Anna Giessel A28). Scale bars: 1 cm.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF0F04FA510FCB81F96F823.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828962/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828962	FIG. 17. — Russula ferruginea subsp. ferruginea Corrales & Vera, subsp. nov. (HUA Corrales 944, holotype). Elements of the hymenium drawn as seen by light microscopy. A, basidia and basidiola; B, marginal cells near the edges of lamellae; C, basidiospores in Melzer’s reagent; D, hymenial cystidia near the edges of lamellae; E, hymenial cystidia on the sides of lamellae. Cystidia with contents as observed in Congo Red. Scale bars: A, B, D, E, 10 μm; C, 5 μm. Drawings by Michelle Vera.	FIG. 17. — Russula ferruginea subsp. ferruginea Corrales & Vera, subsp. nov. (HUA Corrales 944, holotype). Elements of the hymenium drawn as seen by light microscopy. A, basidia and basidiola; B, marginal cells near the edges of lamellae; C, basidiospores in Melzer’s reagent; D, hymenial cystidia near the edges of lamellae; E, hymenial cystidia on the sides of lamellae. Cystidia with contents as observed in Congo Red. Scale bars: A, B, D, E, 10 μm; C, 5 μm. Drawings by Michelle Vera.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF0F04FA510FCB81F96F823.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828964/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828964	FIG. 18. — Russula ferruginea subsp. ferruginea Corrales & Vera, subsp. nov. (HUA Corrales 944, holotype). Elements of the pileipellis drawn as seen by light microscopy. A, pileocystidia near the pileus margin; B, pileocystidia near the pileus center; C, hyphal terminations near the pileus margin; D, hyphal terminations near the pileus center. Cystidia with contents as observed in Congo Red. Scale bar: 10 μm. Drawings by Michelle Vera.	FIG. 18. — Russula ferruginea subsp. ferruginea Corrales & Vera, subsp. nov. (HUA Corrales 944, holotype). Elements of the pileipellis drawn as seen by light microscopy. A, pileocystidia near the pileus margin; B, pileocystidia near the pileus center; C, hyphal terminations near the pileus margin; D, hyphal terminations near the pileus center. Cystidia with contents as observed in Congo Red. Scale bar: 10 μm. Drawings by Michelle Vera.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF0F04FA510FCB81F96F823.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828966/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828966	FIG. 19. — Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of Russula subgenus Heterophillidiae based on combined sequence data of nrLSU, rpb2 and tef1α. Bootstrap values from ML analysis ≥50% and Posterior probabilities from Bayesian inference (BPP) ≥0.95 are shown at branch nodes. The newly generated sequences of R. ferruginea sp. nov. are highlighted in boldface and on coloured background. Data of sequences used for the tree are listed in Table 2. Protocols for DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing followed Vera et al. (2021). Sequences were edited in the BioEdit 7.2.5 sequence alignment editor (Hall 2013) and Geneious R10 (Kearse et al. 2012). Intra-individual polymorphic sites having more than one signal were marked with NC-IUPAC ambiguity codes.The datasets were aligned in MAFFT 7 using the E-INS-i strategy (Katoh & Standley 2013) and manually improved in Geneious R10 (Kearse et al. 2012). Divergent and ambiguously aligned positions in the nrLSU were removed with Gblocks (Castresana 2000) using the least stringent parameters. Intronic positions of rpb2 and tef1α were manually removed. For the BI analysis, the data set was divided into five partitions: 28S, the 1st+2nd, and 3rd codon positions of tef1, the 1st+2nd, and 3rd codon positions of rpb2. The best substitution model for each partition was computed jointly in PartitionFinder 1.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2012). BI runs were computed twice in MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) with four Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains for 10 million iterations until the standard deviation of split frequencies fell below the 0.01 threshold. Convergence of runs was visually assessed using the trace function in Tracer 1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2013). For the ML analysis, the concatenated alignment was loaded as a fasta file to CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al. 2010) and analyzed using RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE (8.2.12) as a partitioned data set (as in the BI analysis) under the GTR+GAMMA model with 1000 bootstrap iterations as recommended by the RAxML user manual (Stamatakis 2014).	FIG. 19. — Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of Russula subgenus Heterophillidiae based on combined sequence data of nrLSU, rpb2 and tef1α. Bootstrap values from ML analysis ≥50% and Posterior probabilities from Bayesian inference (BPP) ≥0.95 are shown at branch nodes. The newly generated sequences of R. ferruginea sp. nov. are highlighted in boldface and on coloured background. Data of sequences used for the tree are listed in Table 2. Protocols for DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing followed Vera et al. (2021). Sequences were edited in the BioEdit 7.2.5 sequence alignment editor (Hall 2013) and Geneious R10 (Kearse et al. 2012). Intra-individual polymorphic sites having more than one signal were marked with NC-IUPAC ambiguity codes.The datasets were aligned in MAFFT 7 using the E-INS-i strategy (Katoh & Standley 2013) and manually improved in Geneious R10 (Kearse et al. 2012). Divergent and ambiguously aligned positions in the nrLSU were removed with Gblocks (Castresana 2000) using the least stringent parameters. Intronic positions of rpb2 and tef1α were manually removed. For the BI analysis, the data set was divided into five partitions: 28S, the 1st+2nd, and 3rd codon positions of tef1, the 1st+2nd, and 3rd codon positions of rpb2. The best substitution model for each partition was computed jointly in PartitionFinder 1.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2012). BI runs were computed twice in MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) with four Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains for 10 million iterations until the standard deviation of split frequencies fell below the 0.01 threshold. Convergence of runs was visually assessed using the trace function in Tracer 1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2013). For the ML analysis, the concatenated alignment was loaded as a fasta file to CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al. 2010) and analyzed using RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE (8.2.12) as a partitioned data set (as in the BI analysis) under the GTR+GAMMA model with 1000 bootstrap iterations as recommended by the RAxML user manual (Stamatakis 2014).	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF0F04FA510FCB81F96F823.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828968/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828968	FIG. 20. — Maximum likelihood tree of Russula sect. Ingratae based on sequence data of the ITS region. The newly generated sequences are in boldface, two subspecies of R. ferruginea sp. nov. are highlighted by different colour backgrounds. Names of taxa are followed by GenBank accession numbers and country of origin of samples, newly generated sequences are annotated with collection numbers. Protocols for DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing followed Vera et al. (2021). Sequences were edited in the BioEdit 7.2.5 sequence alignment editor (Hall 2013) and Geneious R10 (Kearse et al. 2012). The data set was analyzed on the CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al. 2010) under the GTR+GAMMA model with 1000 bootstrap iterations (Stamatakis 2014).	FIG. 20. — Maximum likelihood tree of Russula sect. Ingratae based on sequence data of the ITS region. The newly generated sequences are in boldface, two subspecies of R. ferruginea sp. nov. are highlighted by different colour backgrounds. Names of taxa are followed by GenBank accession numbers and country of origin of samples, newly generated sequences are annotated with collection numbers. Protocols for DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing followed Vera et al. (2021). Sequences were edited in the BioEdit 7.2.5 sequence alignment editor (Hall 2013) and Geneious R10 (Kearse et al. 2012). The data set was analyzed on the CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al. 2010) under the GTR+GAMMA model with 1000 bootstrap iterations (Stamatakis 2014).	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF0F04FA510FCB81F96F823.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828923/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828923	FIG. 5. — Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov., habit in situ (from holotype). Photo: F. Armada.	FIG. 5. — Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov., habit in situ (from holotype). Photo: F. Armada.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF0F04FA510FCB81F96F823.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828927/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828927	FIG. 6. — Microstructures of Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov.: A, spores; B, lamella edge with basidia and basidioles; C, D, elements of pileipellis. Photos: F. Armada. Scale bars: A, 10 µm; B, D, 20 µm; C, 50 µm.	FIG. 6. — Microstructures of Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov.: A, spores; B, lamella edge with basidia and basidioles; C, D, elements of pileipellis. Photos: F. Armada. Scale bars: A, 10 µm; B, D, 20 µm; C, 50 µm.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF8F076A48BFF1A1AFBFAA1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828959/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828959	FIG. 16. — Basidiomata of Russula ferruginea Corrales & Vera,sp. nov.A, basidiomata of Russula ferruginea subsp.ferruginea Corrales & Vera, subsp. nov. in the field (HUA Corrales935); B, C, basidiomata of Russula ferruginea subsp. panamensis Corrales & Vera,subsp. nov.in the field (ARIZ Corrales099); D, basidiomata of Russula ferruginea subsp. panamensis Corrales & Vera, subsp. nov. (UCH Anna Giessel A28). Scale bars: 1 cm.	FIG. 16. — Basidiomata of Russula ferruginea Corrales & Vera,sp. nov.A, basidiomata of Russula ferruginea subsp.ferruginea Corrales & Vera, subsp. nov. in the field (HUA Corrales935); B, C, basidiomata of Russula ferruginea subsp. panamensis Corrales & Vera,subsp. nov.in the field (ARIZ Corrales099); D, basidiomata of Russula ferruginea subsp. panamensis Corrales & Vera, subsp. nov. (UCH Anna Giessel A28). Scale bars: 1 cm.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFF8F076A48BFF1A1AFBFAA1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828927/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828927	FIG. 6. — Microstructures of Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov.: A, spores; B, lamella edge with basidia and basidioles; C, D, elements of pileipellis. Photos: F. Armada. Scale bars: A, 10 µm; B, D, 20 µm; C, 50 µm.	FIG. 6. — Microstructures of Entoloma nigroflavescens Armada, Bellanger, Noordel. & Dima, sp. nov.: A, spores; B, lamella edge with basidia and basidioles; C, D, elements of pileipellis. Photos: F. Armada. Scale bars: A, 10 µm; B, D, 20 µm; C, 50 µm.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFC7F071A56AF9FE1AD2FA81.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828974/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828974	FIG. 23. — A Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogram inferred from raxmlGUI 2.0 (Edler et al. 2021) on a concatenated dataset of nrITS and nrLSU sequence data of Vuilleminia and related genera. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70%) obtained from ML analysis are shown above or below the branches at nodes. Two collections of our novel Indian species are shown in red and the holotype in bold in the phylogram. See Table 3 for details on used vouchers for the phylogenetic analysis.	FIG. 23. — A Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogram inferred from raxmlGUI 2.0 (Edler et al. 2021) on a concatenated dataset of nrITS and nrLSU sequence data of Vuilleminia and related genera. One thousand bootstrap replicates were analyzed to obtain nodal support values. Bootstrap support values (>70%) obtained from ML analysis are shown above or below the branches at nodes. Two collections of our novel Indian species are shown in red and the holotype in bold in the phylogram. See Table 3 for details on used vouchers for the phylogenetic analysis.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFC7F071A56AF9FE1AD2FA81.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828976/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828976	FIG. 24. — Vuilleminia tropica Hembrom, A. Ghosh, A. Parihar & K. Das, sp. nov. (from holotype): A, B, basidiomata showing decorticant tendency of growth on bark; C, habit; D, basidioles filled with dense globules in cytoplasm and empty septate basidia; E, section through hymenium showing basidia, basidioles and hyphidia; F, indistinct subiculum with crystalline contents; G, H, dendrohyphidia; I, hyphidia; J, septate, moderately thick-walled hyphae in indistinct subiculum; K, clamped moderately thick-walled hyphae with cyanophilic cytoplasmic contents; L, delicate thin-walled clamped hyphae; M, basidiospores in phloxine; N, basidiospore in cotton blue showing thick-wall and cyanophilic cytoplasmic contents. Scale bars: D-I, M, 10 µm; J-L, N, 5 µm.	FIG. 24. — Vuilleminia tropica Hembrom, A. Ghosh, A. Parihar & K. Das, sp. nov. (from holotype): A, B, basidiomata showing decorticant tendency of growth on bark; C, habit; D, basidioles filled with dense globules in cytoplasm and empty septate basidia; E, section through hymenium showing basidia, basidioles and hyphidia; F, indistinct subiculum with crystalline contents; G, H, dendrohyphidia; I, hyphidia; J, septate, moderately thick-walled hyphae in indistinct subiculum; K, clamped moderately thick-walled hyphae with cyanophilic cytoplasmic contents; L, delicate thin-walled clamped hyphae; M, basidiospores in phloxine; N, basidiospore in cotton blue showing thick-wall and cyanophilic cytoplasmic contents. Scale bars: D-I, M, 10 µm; J-L, N, 5 µm.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
511E879FFFC7F071A56AF9FE1AD2FA81.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7828979/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828979	FIG. 25. — Vuilleminia tropica Hembrom, A. Ghosh, A. Parihar & K. Das, sp. nov. (holotype): A, basidia and basidioles; B, dendrohyphidia, hyphidia and thin to thick-walled hyphae; C, thick-walled basidiospores; D, part of indistinct subiculum below subhymenial layer; E, section through hymenium and subhymenium. Scale bars: 10 µm.	FIG. 25. — Vuilleminia tropica Hembrom, A. Ghosh, A. Parihar & K. Das, sp. nov. (holotype): A, basidia and basidioles; B, dendrohyphidia, hyphidia and thin to thick-walled hyphae; C, thick-walled basidiospores; D, part of indistinct subiculum below subhymenial layer; E, section through hymenium and subhymenium. Scale bars: 10 µm.	2022-03-03	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket		Zenodo	biologists	Buyck, Bart;Eyssartier, Guillaume;Armada, François;Corrales, Adriana;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Rossi, Walter;Bellanger, Jean-Michel;Das, Kanad;Dima, Bálint;Ghosh, Aniket			
