taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
255E7B23FFC0FFCACC248F17672CF99D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7829754/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7829754	FIG. 4. — Phylogram generated by Maximum Likelihood analysis based on nrITS sequence data of Russula boddingii Hembrom, D.Chakr., A.Ghosh & K.Das, sp. nov. and allied species. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap support values (MLbs) ≥ 70% are shown on the left of “/” and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) ≥ 0.95 are shown on the right above or below the branches at nodes. Russula boddingii Hembrom, D.Chakr., A.Ghosh & K.Das, sp. nov. is placed in red font to highlight its phylogenetic position in the tree.	FIG. 4. — Phylogram generated by Maximum Likelihood analysis based on nrITS sequence data of Russula boddingii Hembrom, D.Chakr., A.Ghosh & K.Das, sp. nov. and allied species. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap support values (MLbs) ≥ 70% are shown on the left of “/” and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) ≥ 0.95 are shown on the right above or below the branches at nodes. Russula boddingii Hembrom, D.Chakr., A.Ghosh & K.Das, sp. nov. is placed in red font to highlight its phylogenetic position in the tree.	2023-03-21	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad		Zenodo	biologists	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad			
255E7B23FFC0FFCACC248F17672CF99D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7829758/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7829758	FIG. 5. — Russula boddingii Hembrom, D.Chakr., A.Ghosh & K.Das, sp. nov. (from holotype): A-D, fresh and dissected basidiomata in the field and basecamp; E, F, transverse section through pileipellis showing elements; G, transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae edges; H, I, transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae sides; J, transverse section through lamellae showing basidia. Scale bars: A, 40 mm; E, 100 μm; F-J, 10 μm.	FIG. 5. — Russula boddingii Hembrom, D.Chakr., A.Ghosh & K.Das, sp. nov. (from holotype): A-D, fresh and dissected basidiomata in the field and basecamp; E, F, transverse section through pileipellis showing elements; G, transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae edges; H, I, transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae sides; J, transverse section through lamellae showing basidia. Scale bars: A, 40 mm; E, 100 μm; F-J, 10 μm.	2023-03-21	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad		Zenodo	biologists	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad			
255E7B23FFC0FFCACC248F17672CF99D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7829760/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7829760	FIG. 6. — Russula boddingii Hembrom, D.Chakr., A.Ghosh & K.Das, sp. nov. (from holotype): A, basidiospore; B, hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae edges; C, elements of the pileipellis near the pileus centre:hyphal terminations; D, basidia; E, hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae sides; F, elements of the pileipellis near the pileus margin: hyphal terminations. Scale bars: 10 µm.	FIG. 6. — Russula boddingii Hembrom, D.Chakr., A.Ghosh & K.Das, sp. nov. (from holotype): A, basidiospore; B, hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae edges; C, elements of the pileipellis near the pileus centre:hyphal terminations; D, basidia; E, hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae sides; F, elements of the pileipellis near the pileus margin: hyphal terminations. Scale bars: 10 µm.	2023-03-21	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad		Zenodo	biologists	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad			
255E7B23FFC4FFD4C9668FB1646DFCFB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7829762/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7829762	FIG. 7. — Phylogram generated by Maximum Likelihood analysis based on nrITS sequence data of Russula pseudoflavida A.Ghosh, Hembrom, I.Bera & Buyck, sp. nov. and allied species. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap support values (MLbs) ≥ 70% are shown on the left of “/” and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) ≥ 0.95 are shown on the right above or below the branches at nodes. Russula pseudoflavida A.Ghosh, Hembrom, I.Bera & Buyck, sp. nov. is placed in red font to highlight its phylogenetic position in the tree.	FIG. 7. — Phylogram generated by Maximum Likelihood analysis based on nrITS sequence data of Russula pseudoflavida A.Ghosh, Hembrom, I.Bera & Buyck, sp. nov. and allied species. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap support values (MLbs) ≥ 70% are shown on the left of “/” and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) ≥ 0.95 are shown on the right above or below the branches at nodes. Russula pseudoflavida A.Ghosh, Hembrom, I.Bera & Buyck, sp. nov. is placed in red font to highlight its phylogenetic position in the tree.	2023-03-21	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad		Zenodo	biologists	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad			
255E7B23FFC4FFD4C9668FB1646DFCFB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7829764/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7829764	FIG. 8. — Russula pseudoflavida A.Ghosh, Hembrom, I.Bera & Buyck, sp. nov. (from holotype): A-C, fresh and dissected basidiomata in the field and basecamp; D-F, transverse section through pileipellis showing elements;G, primordial hyphae in carbolfuchsine; H-J, transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae sides; K, transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae edges. Scale bars: A, B, 20 mm; D, E, G, 20 μm; F, H-K, 10 μm.	FIG. 8. — Russula pseudoflavida A.Ghosh, Hembrom, I.Bera & Buyck, sp. nov. (from holotype): A-C, fresh and dissected basidiomata in the field and basecamp; D-F, transverse section through pileipellis showing elements;G, primordial hyphae in carbolfuchsine; H-J, transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae sides; K, transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae edges. Scale bars: A, B, 20 mm; D, E, G, 20 μm; F, H-K, 10 μm.	2023-03-21	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad		Zenodo	biologists	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad			
255E7B23FFC4FFD4C9668FB1646DFCFB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7829766/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7829766	FIG. 9. — Russula pseudoflavida A.Ghosh, Hembrom, I.Bera & Buyck, sp. nov. (from holotype): A, basidiospore; B, basidia; C, hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae edges; D, hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae sides; E, marginal cells; F, elements of the pileipellis near the pileus margin: hyphal terminations; G, elements of the pileipellis near the pileus centre: hyphal terminations; H, doubtfull primordial hyphae. Scale bars: 10 µm.	FIG. 9. — Russula pseudoflavida A.Ghosh, Hembrom, I.Bera & Buyck, sp. nov. (from holotype): A, basidiospore; B, basidia; C, hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae edges; D, hymenial gloeocystidia near the lamellae sides; E, marginal cells; F, elements of the pileipellis near the pileus margin: hyphal terminations; G, elements of the pileipellis near the pileus centre: hyphal terminations; H, doubtfull primordial hyphae. Scale bars: 10 µm.	2023-03-21	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad		Zenodo	biologists	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad			
255E7B23FFC4FFD4C9668FB1646DFCFB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7829752/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7829752	FIG. 3. — Phylogram generated by Maximum Likelihood analysis based on combined sequence data of nrLSU,mtSSU and rpb2 for Russula boddingii Hembrom, D.Chakr., A.Ghosh & K.Das, sp. nov., R. pseudoflavida A.Ghosh, Hembrom, I.Bera & Buyck, sp. nov. and R. shoreae D.Chakr., A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck, sp. nov. and their allied species. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap support values (MLbs) ≥70% are shown on the left of “/” and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) ≥ 0.95 are shown on the right above or below the branches at nodes. The new species are placed in red font to highlight their phylogenetic positions in the tree.	FIG. 3. — Phylogram generated by Maximum Likelihood analysis based on combined sequence data of nrLSU,mtSSU and rpb2 for Russula boddingii Hembrom, D.Chakr., A.Ghosh & K.Das, sp. nov., R. pseudoflavida A.Ghosh, Hembrom, I.Bera & Buyck, sp. nov. and R. shoreae D.Chakr., A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck, sp. nov. and their allied species. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap support values (MLbs) ≥70% are shown on the left of “/” and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) ≥ 0.95 are shown on the right above or below the branches at nodes. The new species are placed in red font to highlight their phylogenetic positions in the tree.	2023-03-21	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad		Zenodo	biologists	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad			
255E7B23FFDAFFD0C95B8A596509F906.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7829770/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7829770	FIG. 10. — Phylogram generated by Maximum Likelihood analysis based on nrITS sequence data of Russula shorae D.Chakr., A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck, sp. nov. and their allied species. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap support values (MLbs) ≥70% are shown on the left of “/” and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) ≥ 0.95 are shown on the right above or below the branches at nodes. Russula shorae D.Chakr., A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck,sp. nov. is placed in red font to highlight their phylogenetic positions in the tree.	FIG. 10. — Phylogram generated by Maximum Likelihood analysis based on nrITS sequence data of Russula shorae D.Chakr., A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck, sp. nov. and their allied species. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap support values (MLbs) ≥70% are shown on the left of “/” and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) ≥ 0.95 are shown on the right above or below the branches at nodes. Russula shorae D.Chakr., A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck,sp. nov. is placed in red font to highlight their phylogenetic positions in the tree.	2023-03-21	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad		Zenodo	biologists	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad			
255E7B23FFDAFFD0C95B8A596509F906.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7829772/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7829772	FIG. 11. — Russula shoreae D.Chakr., A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck, sp. nov. (from holotype): A-C, fresh and dissected basidiomata in the field and basecamp; D, E, transverse section through pileipellis showing elements; F, transverse section through lamellae showing basidia; G, H, transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial cystidia near the lamellae edges; I-M, transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial cystidia near the lamellae sides. Scale bars: A, B, 20 mm; D, 20 μm; E-M, 10 μm.	FIG. 11. — Russula shoreae D.Chakr., A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck, sp. nov. (from holotype): A-C, fresh and dissected basidiomata in the field and basecamp; D, E, transverse section through pileipellis showing elements; F, transverse section through lamellae showing basidia; G, H, transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial cystidia near the lamellae edges; I-M, transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial cystidia near the lamellae sides. Scale bars: A, B, 20 mm; D, 20 μm; E-M, 10 μm.	2023-03-21	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad		Zenodo	biologists	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad			
255E7B23FFDAFFD0C95B8A596509F906.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7829774/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7829774	FIG. 12. — Russula shoreae D.Chakr., A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck, sp. nov. (from holotype): A, basidiospore; B, elements of the pileipellis near the pileus margin: hyphal terminations and pileocystidia; C, hymenial cystidia near the lamellae sides; D, basidia; E, hymenial cystidia near the lamellae edges; F, elements of the pileipellis near the pileus centre: hyphal terminations and pileocystidia. Scale bars: 10 µm.	FIG. 12. — Russula shoreae D.Chakr., A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck, sp. nov. (from holotype): A, basidiospore; B, elements of the pileipellis near the pileus margin: hyphal terminations and pileocystidia; C, hymenial cystidia near the lamellae sides; D, basidia; E, hymenial cystidia near the lamellae edges; F, elements of the pileipellis near the pileus centre: hyphal terminations and pileocystidia. Scale bars: 10 µm.	2023-03-21	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad		Zenodo	biologists	Ghosh, Aniket;Buyck, Bart;Chakraborty, Dyutiparna;Hembrom, Manoj Emanuel;Bera, Ishika;Das, Kanad			
