taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
0B836DE0D4EA5D30A2E9C596913AE097.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/636327	https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.45.61588.figure2	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	2022-01-21	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek		Zenodo	biologists	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek			
E960C8E4F4375184932C93E04C0FF7F9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/636327	https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.45.61588.figure2	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	2022-01-21	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek		Zenodo	biologists	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek			
A753C2F39418537BA2972D83B6803ACA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/636327	https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.45.61588.figure2	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	2022-01-21	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek		Zenodo	biologists	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek			
FDE2C5B89DE5585D89D773263A4C7F06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/636327	https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.45.61588.figure2	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	2022-01-21	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek		Zenodo	biologists	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek			
B0DA3A655B7C59928E8CE95241CEAC93.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/636327	https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.45.61588.figure2	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	2022-01-21	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek		Zenodo	biologists	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek			
B5F919A82D655F139B0A59A791B91362.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/636327	https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.45.61588.figure2	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	2022-01-21	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek		Zenodo	biologists	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek			
59F8BA8305C75F869516DE77A0D26FB9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/636327	https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.45.61588.figure2	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	Figure 2. Seven representatives of newly recorded genera of tussock moths in Mozambique. A. Euproctoides ertli (Wichgraf, 1922); B. Heteronygmia dissimilis (Aurivillius, 1910); C. Leucoma ogovensis (Holland, 1893); D. Ogoa simplex Walker, 1856; E. Paraproctis chionopeza Collenette, 1954; F. Polymona rufifemur Walker, 1855; G. Tamsita habrotima (Tams, 1930). Scale bars: 1 cm.	2022-01-21	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek		Zenodo	biologists	Rindos, Michal;Schintlmeister, Alexander;Fric, Zdenek Faltynek			
