identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
A96E8A5DFFDAFFCDDDDCF8EEE6F09BC6.text	A96E8A5DFFDAFFCDDDDCF8EEE6F09BC6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Scolelepis (Parascolelepis) Maciolek 1987	<div><p>Subgenus Parascolelepis Maciolek, 1987</p> <p>Diagnosis of the genus. Prostomium pointed anteriorly, extending posteriorly into caruncle; occipital antennae present or absent. Peristomium well-developed, with or without lateral wings. Palps without ciliated groove, but with transverse ciliary bands; basal sheaths usually well-developed, with or without papillae. Branchiae from chaetiger 2; anterior branchiae complete or partially fused to notopodial lamellae. Hooks in neuropodia present; multidentate with several apical teeth above main fang, with strongly curved shaft. Hooks in notopodia absent. Pygidium with oval disc or multilobed.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/A96E8A5DFFDAFFCDDDDCF8EEE6F09BC6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lee, Geon Hyeok;Min, Gi-Sik	Lee, Geon Hyeok, Min, Gi-Sik (2022): Two new Scolelepis species (Annelida: Spionidae) from the Yellow Sea in Korea. Zootaxa 5092 (2): 221-237, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5092.2.5
A96E8A5DFFD8FFC8DDDCFF28E690989A.text	A96E8A5DFFD8FFC8DDDCFF28E690989A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Scolelepis (Parascolelepis) anterobranchiata Lee & Min 2022	<div><p>Scolelepis (Parascolelepis) anterobranchiata sp. nov.</p> <p>Figures 2–5</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype. complete specimen (NIBRIV0000890299), without palps (Fig. 2A), formalin, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=126.05728&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=34.920002" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 126.05728/lat 34.920002)">Yellow Sea</a>, Korea, 34°55'12.0"N, 126°03'26.2"E, 4 Oct 2020, intertidal muddy sand, coll. Lee GH.</p> <p>Paratypes. Seven complete (NIBRIV0000890300–6) and one af (VSJAIV0000001433), formalin, collection details same as holotype, coll. Lee GH.</p> <p>Additional material. 4 complete (NIBRIV0000890307–9 for molecular analysis), same data as holotype, 95% ethanol; 2 af, formalin, same locality as holotype, 5 Oct 2020, coll. Lee GH.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Prostomium elongated, anterior conical with broadly rounded point, posteriorly extended into low caruncle attached to dorsum; caruncle extending to end of chaetiger 2 with slight elevation on posterior part. Palps long, thin, with smooth sheath at base, usually distinctly thickened at base part with globular expansions; palps with separated, single row of mucus-secreting cells and accompanying cilia; irregular longitudinal swellings present but not parallel. Chaetiger 1 well developed, with rounded lamellae in both rami; notochaetae absent. Branchiae from chaetiger 2 to chaetigers 18–19. Notopodial postchaetal lamellae foliate with pointed tip, largest on chaetigers 5–12; almost entirely fused but distally free from branchiae; from chaetiger 15 to middle chaetigers notopodia becoming smaller. Neuropodial postchaetal lamellae broadly rounded, from chaetiger 16 slightly notched. Neuropodial hooded hooks from chaetigers 18–19 with 2 pairs of teeth in parallel position surmounting well-developed main fang, apical pair smallest. Pygidium slightly broad, rounded, with anus opening dorsally.</p> <p>Description. Holotype complete with 58 chaetigers, about 0.9 mm wide and about 7.0 mm long (Fig. 2A). Other specimens complete with 56–63 chaetigers, similar to holotype in width and length. Body dorsoventrally flattened anteriorly, cylindrical posteriorly (Fig. 2A, B).</p> <p>Prostomium elongated, anterior conical with broadly rounded point, posteriorly extended into low caruncle attached to dorsum; caruncle extending to end of chaetiger 2 with slight elevation on posterior part; two pairs of reddish eyes (in both live and fixed specimens) arranged in trapezoid, anterolateral pair slightly larger, crescent-shaped, widely separated, and posterior pair smaller, rounded; occipital antenna absent (Fig. 3A, B). Peristomium well-developed, separated from prostomium without furrows, not forming lateral wings (Fig. 3B). Palps long, thin, reaching about two-thirds of body in live specimens (Fig. 2B) (but rather thickened in formalin and ethanol-fixed specimens (Fig. 2C), reaching to chaetigers 15–22), with smooth sheath at base, usually distinctly thickened at basal part with globular expansions (weak expansions in two specimens) (Figs. 2C, 5A); palps with separated, single row of mucus-secreting cells and accompanying cilia (Fig. 5B, C); long rows approximately 72 μm long, short rows approximately 10 μm long; irregular longitudinal swellings present but not parallel, with smooth inner portion surrounded by mucus-secreting cells and cilia (Fig. 5B, C). Low but distinct transverse ciliated bands present throughout body.</p> <p>Chaetiger 1 well developed, with rounded lamellae in both rami; notochaetae absent (Fig. 3A, B). Branchiae from chaetiger 2 to chaetigers 18–19, longest on chaetigers 5–12, quickly decreasing in size posteriorly; branchiae long cirriform with pointed tips, longer than notopodial postchaetal lamellae until chaetiger 15; accessory branchiae absent (Fig. 4). Notopodial postchaetal lamellae foliate with pointed tips, largest on chaetigers 5–12; almost entirely fused but distally free from branchiae (Fig. 4B–D); from chaetiger 15 to middle chaetigers notopodia becoming smaller (Fig. 4E); notopodia of middle to posterior chaetigers becoming slightly larger with foliate but less folded notopodial postchaetal lamellae (Fig. 4F). Neuropodial postchaetal lamellae broadly rounded (Fig. 4A–D), from chaetiger 16 slightly notched (Fig. 4E), from chaetiger 23 divided into rounded lobe in interramal position and low flattened postchaetal lamella; interramal lobe becoming conical with rounded tip on posterior chaetigers (Fig. 4F).</p> <p>Anterior chaetae all non-granulated capillaries with narrow sheaths (Fig. 3D), arranged in two rows in both rami, anterior row slightly shorter than posterior row; from about chaetiger 18, 3–5 long, thin non-limbate notochaetae arranged in irregular rows, more posteriorly arranged in bundle (Fig. 4F). Neuropodial hooded hooks from chaetigers 18–19 (18 in holotype), numbering 7–8 per fascicle at first, then increasing to 15–16 per fascicle posteriorly; hooded hooks with strongly curved shaft, with open hoods (Figs. 2D, 3E, 5D); hooks with 2 pairs of teeth in parallel position surmounting well-developed main fang, apical pair smallest (Fig. 3E); hooks not accompanied by capillaries. Ventral sabre chaetae absent.</p> <p>Pygidium slightly broad, rounded, with anus opening dorsally (Figs. 3C, 5E).</p> <p>Pigmentation. Whitish color in live specimens with orange-brownish pigmentation on the prostomium, peristomium, and base of palps. In formalin- or ethanol-fixed specimens, orange-brownish pigmentation usually fades or is completely lost (pigmentation well-preserved in only two fixed specimens); if pigmentation is preserved, conspicuously present on the caruncle and basal sheaths of palps (Fig. 2C).</p> <p>Methyl green staining pattern. Stain retained on prostomium, posterior part of caruncle, peristomium, notopodial postchaetal lamellae, and distal tips of branchiae. Anterior and middle segments with horizontal bands of deeply staining cells on venter.</p> <p>Etymology. The Latin name of the new species refers to having branchiae only on the anterior body region.</p> <p>Habitat and distribution. The new species was found in the muddy sand of the intertidal zone of the Yellow Sea.</p> <p>Remarks. Scolelepis (Parascolelepis) anterobranchiata morphologically is most similar to S. (P.) globosa from China, in having the palps with smooth globular expansions at the base, absence of notochaetae on chaetiger 1, notopodial postchaetal lamellae partially fused with branchiae in anterior chaetigers, and neuropodial hooded hooks appearing tridentate in lateral view (Wu &amp; Chen 1964, Blake et al. 2019). Based on the current knowledge, only these two species have palps with smooth globular expansions in this subgenus. However, the new species differs from S. (P.) globosa by the absence of an occipital antenna instead of presence, branchiae appearing in the anterior part of the body instead of the whole body, and neuropodial hooded hooks from chaetigers 18–19 instead of 21 (Wu &amp; Chen 1964). The new species is also similar to S. (P.) geniculata from Japan in the absence of an occipital antenna and flattened postchaetal neuropodial lamellae but differs in the absence of papillae on palps instead of presence, the absence of notochaetae on first chaetigers instead of presence, notopodial postchaetal lamellae partially fused to branchiae in the anterior part of the body instead of completely fused, and two pairs of apical teeth instead of three pairs (Imajima 1992).</p> <p>The palp ciliation patterns are of important taxonomic character (Williams 2007). The palps of the new species have a single row of mucus-secreting cells and accompanying cilia with irregular longitudinal swellings. This is the first palp ciliation pattern described in detail for the subgenus Parascolelepis and it is unique among the species of Scolelepis studied to date.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/A96E8A5DFFD8FFC8DDDCFF28E690989A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lee, Geon Hyeok;Min, Gi-Sik	Lee, Geon Hyeok, Min, Gi-Sik (2022): Two new Scolelepis species (Annelida: Spionidae) from the Yellow Sea in Korea. Zootaxa 5092 (2): 221-237, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5092.2.5
A96E8A5DFFDCFFC8DDDCFC53E5649E3D.text	A96E8A5DFFDCFFC8DDDCFC53E5649E3D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Scolelepis Blainville 1828	<div><p>Subgenus Scolelepis Blainville, 1828</p> <p>Diagnosis of the genus. Prostomium pointed anteriorly, trifid (sagittiform), sometimes truncate, extending posteriorly into caruncle; occipital antennae present or absent. Peristomium well-developed, with or without lateral wings. Palps without ciliated groove, but usually with transverse ciliary bands; basal sheaths weakly developed. Branchiae from chaetiger 2; anterior branchiae complete or partially fused to notopodial lamellae. Hooded hooks in neuropodia present, 0–3 apical teeth above main fang, with straight or falcate shaft; hooks in notopodia present or absent. Pygidium with oval disc or multilobed.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/A96E8A5DFFDCFFC8DDDCFC53E5649E3D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lee, Geon Hyeok;Min, Gi-Sik	Lee, Geon Hyeok, Min, Gi-Sik (2022): Two new Scolelepis species (Annelida: Spionidae) from the Yellow Sea in Korea. Zootaxa 5092 (2): 221-237, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5092.2.5
A96E8A5DFFDCFFC2DDDCFAECE2599A22.text	A96E8A5DFFDCFFC2DDDCFAECE2599A22.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Scolelepis (Scolelepis) rubra Lee & Min 2022	<div><p>Scolelepis (Scolelepis) rubra sp. nov.</p> <p>Figures 6–8</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype. complete specimen (NIBRIV0000890310), with palps (Fig. 6A), formalin, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=126.51975&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=36.161446" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 126.51975/lat 36.161446)">Yellow Sea</a>, Korea, 36°09'41.2"N, 126°31'11.1"E, 20 Oct. 2020, intertidal sand, coll. Lee GH.</p> <p>Paratypes. one af (NIBRIV0000890311), formalin, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=126.52492&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=35.678947" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 126.52492/lat 35.678947)">Yellow Sea</a>, Korea, 126°31'29.7"E, 35°40'44.2"N, 19 Sep. 2020, intertidal sand, coll. Lee GH; five af (NIBRIV0000890312–6), formalin, 36°15'42.9"N, 126°32'47.9"E, 21 Oct. 2020, intertidal sand, coll. Lee GH.</p> <p>Additional material. <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=126.48553&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=35.595722" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 126.48553/lat 35.595722)">Yellow Sea</a>, Korea: 4 complete (NIBRIV0000890317–8 for molecular analysis), 1 af (NIBRIV0000890319 for molecular analysis), same data as holotype, 95% ethanol; 2 af, same data as paratype; 1 complete, 3 af, same data as holotype; 1 complete, formalin, 35°35'44.6"N, 126°29'07.9"E, 19 Sep. 2020, muddy sand, 3 af, formalin, 35°39'16.4"N, 126°29'26.0"E, 21 Sep 2020; 3 af, formalin, 36°14'26.1"N, 126°31'49.1"E, 20 Oct. 2020; 2 complete, 3 af, formalin, 36°13'53.3"N, 126°31'47.2"E, 20 Oct. 2020; 3 af, formalin, 36°15'42.9"N, 126°32'47.9"E, 21 Oct. 2020; 2 complete, formalin, 37°14'38.3"N 126°19'22.2"E, 21 Oct. 2020. All examined materials were collected by Lee GH from sandy intertidal zones.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Prostomium conical, anteriorly pointed, occasionally with lateral angles, distinctly projecting over peristomium; caruncle reaching end of chaetiger 1, attached to dorsum. Palps rather short, usually thickened basally, reaching to about chaetiger 4; palps with three separated, irregular groups of mucus-secreting cells and accompanying cilia. Chaetiger 1 well developed, with subulate postchaetal lamellae in both rami; notochaetae present. Branchiae from chaetiger 2, present throughout body; branchiae cirriform, about twice as long as notopodial postchaetal lamellae. Notopodial postchaetal lamellae foliate, less folded, almost completely fused to branchiae but distally free; from chaetiger 24, basal part of notopodial postchaetal lamellae becoming detached from branchiae; in posterior chaetigers, notopodial postchaetal lamellae becoming subtriangular. Capillary chaetae and bidentate hooded hooks in neuropodia and notopodia; hooded hooks in neuropodia usually from chaetigers 26–31 and hooded hooks in notopodia present in posteriormost chaetigers; hooded hooks all bidentate with upright apical tooth surmounting main fang. Pygidium slightly broad, rounded, with anus opening dorsally.</p> <p>Description. Holotype complete with 125 chaetigers, about 0.8 mm wide and about 48.5 mm long (Fig. 6A). Paratype af with 66 chaetigers, about 0.8 mm wide and about 21.5 mm long. Other specimens with 55–130 chaetigers, 0.5–1.0 mm wide and 10.0–50.0 mm long.</p> <p>Prostomium conical, anteriorly pointed (Fig. 6C, F), occasionally with lateral angles (Fig. 6D), distinctly projecting over peristomium, caruncle reaching end of chaetiger 1, caruncle attached to dorsum (Fig. 7A, B); usually two pairs of reddish eyes (absent in holotype) arranged in trapezoid but almost straight in some specimens, anterolateral pair slightly larger, crescent-shaped, widely separated; posterior pair smaller, rounded; occipital antenna absent. Peristomium well-developed, separated from prostomium by furrow (Fig. 6F), forming lateral wings partially encompassing prostomium posteriorly (Fig. 7A, B). Palps rather short, usually thickened basally, reaching to about chaetiger 4 (Fig. 7B); palps with three separated, irregular groups of mucus-secreting cells and accompanying cilia (Fig. 6G), longest rows approximately 31 μm long, two short rows approximately 8 μm and 9 μm long (Fig. 6G); division between two short rows not as distinct as between longest and short rows (Fig. 6F inset). Distinct transverse ciliary bands present throughout body.</p> <p>Chaetiger 1 well developed, with subulate postchaetal lamellae in both rami; notochaetae present (Fig. 7A, B). Branchiae from chaetiger 2, present throughout body; branchiae cirriform, about twice as long as notopodial postchaetal lamellae, with pointed tip distally; largest in anterior and middle chaetigers (Fig. 8A–E), becoming thinner and shorter in posterior chaetigers (Fig. 8F). Notopodial postchaetal lamellae foliate, less folded, almost completely fused to branchiae but distally free; from chaetiger 24, basal part of notopodial postchaetal lamellae becoming detached from branchiae (Fig. 8D); in posterior chaetigers, notopodial postchaetal lamellae becoming subtriangular (Fig. 8F). Prechaetal notopodial lamellae small, rounded, most conspicuous in anterior chaetigers, absent on chaetiger 1 (Figs. 7B, 8). Neuropodial postchaetal lamellae rounded from chaetiger 2, from chaetiger 16 slightly notched (Fig. 8C), from about chaetiger 27 divided into large rounded neuropodial lamella and inferior conical lobe with rounded tip (Fig. 8D); in middle chaetigers, neuropodial postchaetal lamellae with low, flattened middle portion, conical superior part, and inferior lobe becoming shifted ventrally (Fig. 8E); in posterior chaetigers, neuropodial superior part becoming thin, digitiform and inferior lobe shifted to inferiormost position (Fig. 8F). Prechaetal neuropodial lamellae absent.</p> <p>Capillary chaetae and bidentate hooded hooks in neuropodia and notopodia. Anterior chaetae all slightly granulated capillaries with narrow sheaths (Fig. 7D), arranged in two rows until hook-bearing chaetigers; capillary chaetae of anterior chaetigers with 2–3 thin, long chaetae in superiormost position; capillary chaetae of middle and posterior chaetigers thin, non-granulated, not clearly arranged in rows within fascicle. Hooded hooks in neuropodia usually from chaetigers 26–31 (21 in small and 32–35 in large specimens, 31 in holotype) (Fig. 8E), numbering usually 2 (1–3, rarely 4) per fascicle at first, then increasing up to 11 hooks per fascicle more posteriorly; hooded hooks in notopodia present in posteriormost chaetigers (appearing from chaetiger 85 in holotype), numbering usually 2 per fascicle; hooded hooks all bidentate with upright apical tooth surmounting main fang, with open hoods (Figs. 6E, 7E); hooks in neuropodia accompanied by a few thin, long, smooth capillaries with very narrow sheaths in about first 8–10 hook-bearing chaetigers, then decreasing to 1–2 in superior position posteriorly (Fig. 8F). Inferior capillaries or ventral sabre chaetae absent.</p> <p>Pygidium slightly broad, rounded, with anus opening dorsally (Fig. 7C).</p> <p>Pigmentation. Color of live and formalin-fixed specimens bright reddish-pink (Figs. 6A, B) with orangebrownish pigmentation on middle and posterior margin of prostomium, on the dorsum in the vicinity of the caruncle (Fig. 6C), and the basal part of palps (Fig. 7B), but some specimens lack any pigmentation.</p> <p>Methyl green staining pattern. Inconspicuous: Prostomium, peristomium, branchiae, and neuropodial postchaetal lobes were most intensely stained (Fig. 6D).</p> <p>Etymology. The specific name, rubra, originates from the Latin word ruber, meaning red. This name refers to the reddish-pink body.</p> <p>Habitat and distribution. The new species was found in intertidal sandy beaches on South Korean shores in the Yellow Sea.</p> <p>Remarks. Seven species of the subgenus Scolelepis are known for the presence of notopodial chaetae in chaetiger 1, notopodial hooded hooks, neuropodial bidentate hooded hooks, notopodial postchaetal lamellae partially fused to branchiae in the anterior body, and absence of the occipital antenna: S. (S.) blakei Hartmann-Schröder, 1980; S. (S.) bifida Hutchings &amp; Turvey, 1984; S. (S.) carunculata Blake &amp; Kudenov, 1978; S. (S.) chilensis (Hartmann-Schröder, 1962); S. (S.) daphoinos, S. (S.) kudenovi; and S. (S.) hutchingsae Dauer, 1985 (Hartmann-Schröder 1962, 1980; Blake &amp; Kudenov 1978; Hutchings &amp; Turvey 1984; Dauer 1985; Williams 2007; Zhou et al. 2009; Meiβner &amp; Götting 2015). Among these, the new species is morphologically most similar to S. (S.) kudenovi and S. (S.) hutchingsae from Lizard Island, Australia, with notopodial postchaetal lamellae approximately half the length of the branchiae in anterior chaetigers and hooded hooks with a strikingly upright apical tooth (Dauer 1985; Williams 2007; Meiβner &amp; Götting 2015). However, the new species differs from S. (S.) kudenovi from Lizard Island by having reddish-pink color in both live and fixed specimens instead of white in fixed specimens, the presence of pigmentation on the anteriormost body instead of absence, and neuropodial hooks starting from chaetigers 26–34 vs. chaetigers 38–44; it differs from S. (S.) hutchingsae by the neuropodial hooded hooks starting from chaetigers 26–34 vs. chaetigers 18–20, and notopodial hooks starting much later than neuropodial hooks posteriorly instead of starting in a chaetiger close to the first appearance of neuropodial hooks (Dauer 1985; Williams 2007; Meiβner &amp; Götting 2015). In the Far East, the new species also resembles S. (S.) angulata in having lateral angles on prostomium, the notopodial postchaetal lamellae partially fused, and approximately half the length of the branchiae in anterior chaetigers, and the presence of pigmentation on the posterior part of the prostomium (Zhou 2014). However, the new species is clearly distinguished from the latter species by the reddish-pink color in both live and fixed specimens instead of yellowish in alcohol-fixed specimens, branchiae present along the entire body instead of ending in the middle body, absence of neuropodial prechaetal lamellae instead of presence, and presence of notopodial hooks instead of absence (Zhou 2014). In Korean waters, S. (S.) kudenovi sensu Choi &amp; Yoon, 2016 has hooks with a small apical tooth above the main fang and hook-bearing neuropodial chaetigers with 5–6 capillaries in the inferior position [see figure 1 in Choi &amp; Yoon (2016)] that clearly differs from S. (S.) rubra sp. nov. of the present study and S. (S.) kudenovi from Australia (Hartmann-Schröder 1981; Meiβner &amp; Götting 2015). Unfortunately, Choi &amp; Yoon (2016) did not describe body color, pigmentation and palp ciliation pattern, and all examined specimens they used were anterior fragments. Re-examination of S. (S.) kudenovi in Korea is needed for verification of this identification.</p> <p>The palp ciliation pattern of the new species is similar to those of S. (S.) lefebvrei, S. (S.) squamata (Müller, 1806), S. (S.) vazaha Eibye-Jacobsen &amp; Soares, 2000, and S. (S.) villosivaina Williams 2007 in having long and short rows of cilia that are distinctly separated (Dauer 1983; Eibye-Jacobsen &amp; Soares 2000; Williams 2007). However, the new species differs from the latter by the presence of two indistinctly divided short rows on the palps.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/A96E8A5DFFDCFFC2DDDCFAECE2599A22	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lee, Geon Hyeok;Min, Gi-Sik	Lee, Geon Hyeok, Min, Gi-Sik (2022): Two new Scolelepis species (Annelida: Spionidae) from the Yellow Sea in Korea. Zootaxa 5092 (2): 221-237, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5092.2.5
