taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
287EB65BFFCAFFE27277A2F8EEDFAF4D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868512/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868512	Figure 8. Leaf and floral characters of Cheiridopsis and Conophytum. (A) New leaves of Conophytum wettsteinii breaking out of their papery sheath, with a magenta flower; (B) partial sheath enclosing the emerging leaf pair, with a magenta flower, in Cheiridopsis glomerata; (C) leaves of Cheiridopsis meyeri completely enclosed by a white papery sheath during the dormant period, indicated by the arrow; (D) leaves of Conophytum uviforme completely enclosed in a sheath during the dormant period, indicated by the arrow; (E) Cheiridopsis purpurea with the partial sheath, common to many Cheiridopsis spp. which only encloses part of the leaves during the dormant period; (F) Cheiridopsis aspera with the prominent rough leaf surface often found in subgenus Odontophoroides.	Figure 8. Leaf and floral characters of Cheiridopsis and Conophytum. (A) New leaves of Conophytum wettsteinii breaking out of their papery sheath, with a magenta flower; (B) partial sheath enclosing the emerging leaf pair, with a magenta flower, in Cheiridopsis glomerata; (C) leaves of Cheiridopsis meyeri completely enclosed by a white papery sheath during the dormant period, indicated by the arrow; (D) leaves of Conophytum uviforme completely enclosed in a sheath during the dormant period, indicated by the arrow; (E) Cheiridopsis purpurea with the partial sheath, common to many Cheiridopsis spp. which only encloses part of the leaves during the dormant period; (F) Cheiridopsis aspera with the prominent rough leaf surface often found in subgenus Odontophoroides.	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCAFFE27277A2F8EEDFAF4D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868510/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868510	Figure 7. Capsules in Conophytum and Cheiridopsis. (A) Closed simple capsule of Conophytum wettsteinii; (B) open simple capsule of C.wettsteiniishowingthe absenceof covering membranesandclosing bodies;(C)closed multilocular capsuleof Cheiridopsis denticulata; (D) open capsule of C. denticulata showing the complex internal structures, i.e. covering membranes (cm) and closing bodies (cb), indicated by the white arrows; (E) decumbent capsules of Cheiridopsis subgenus Cheiridopsis, in Cheiridopsis namaquensis; (F) erect capsule of C. denticulata with flat to centrally elevated tops as in Cheiridopsis subgenus Aequifoliae; (G) Cheiridopsis pilosula illustrating the erect capsule with rounded tops, typical of Cheiridopsis subgenus Odontophoroides.	Figure 7. Capsules in Conophytum and Cheiridopsis. (A) Closed simple capsule of Conophytum wettsteinii; (B) open simple capsule of C.wettsteiniishowingthe absenceof covering membranesandclosing bodies;(C)closed multilocular capsuleof Cheiridopsis denticulata; (D) open capsule of C. denticulata showing the complex internal structures, i.e. covering membranes (cm) and closing bodies (cb), indicated by the white arrows; (E) decumbent capsules of Cheiridopsis subgenus Cheiridopsis, in Cheiridopsis namaquensis; (F) erect capsule of C. denticulata with flat to centrally elevated tops as in Cheiridopsis subgenus Aequifoliae; (G) Cheiridopsis pilosula illustrating the erect capsule with rounded tops, typical of Cheiridopsis subgenus Odontophoroides.	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCAFFE27277A2F8EEDFAF4D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868506/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868506	Figure 6. Number of species per quarter degree square (QDS) (Leistner & Morris, 1976) and distribution of Cheiridopsis s.l. and subgenera (as treated in the taxonomic treatment) in the Greater Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. (A) Distribution and number of species per QDS for Cheiridopsis s.l.; (B) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Cheiridopsis; (C) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Odontophoroides (including species of previously recognized Odontophorus); (D) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Aequifoliae (including species of previously recognized Ihlenfeldtia).	Figure 6. Number of species per quarter degree square (QDS) (Leistner & Morris, 1976) and distribution of Cheiridopsis s.l. and subgenera (as treated in the taxonomic treatment) in the Greater Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. (A) Distribution and number of species per QDS for Cheiridopsis s.l.; (B) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Cheiridopsis; (C) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Odontophoroides (including species of previously recognized Odontophorus); (D) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Aequifoliae (including species of previously recognized Ihlenfeldtia).	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCFFFE271DDA1DFE814ADA4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868504/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868504	Figure 5. Character reconstruction of pedicel position and shape of capsule top in the Conophytum clade on the majorityrule consensus tree from the Bayesian inference analysis. (A) pedicel position (Character 5; Appendices 4 and 5), reconstructed in two steps coded as erect or decumbent (Fig. 7E–G); (B) the shape of the capsule top (Character 6; Appendices 4 and 5), reconstructed in one step, coded as convex to rounded (Fig. 7E, G) or flat (to centrally elevated) (Fig. 7G).	Figure 5. Character reconstruction of pedicel position and shape of capsule top in the Conophytum clade on the majorityrule consensus tree from the Bayesian inference analysis. (A) pedicel position (Character 5; Appendices 4 and 5), reconstructed in two steps coded as erect or decumbent (Fig. 7E–G); (B) the shape of the capsule top (Character 6; Appendices 4 and 5), reconstructed in one step, coded as convex to rounded (Fig. 7E, G) or flat (to centrally elevated) (Fig. 7G).	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCFFFE271DDA1DFE814ADA4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868510/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868510	Figure 7. Capsules in Conophytum and Cheiridopsis. (A) Closed simple capsule of Conophytum wettsteinii; (B) open simple capsule of C.wettsteiniishowingthe absenceof covering membranesandclosing bodies;(C)closed multilocular capsuleof Cheiridopsis denticulata; (D) open capsule of C. denticulata showing the complex internal structures, i.e. covering membranes (cm) and closing bodies (cb), indicated by the white arrows; (E) decumbent capsules of Cheiridopsis subgenus Cheiridopsis, in Cheiridopsis namaquensis; (F) erect capsule of C. denticulata with flat to centrally elevated tops as in Cheiridopsis subgenus Aequifoliae; (G) Cheiridopsis pilosula illustrating the erect capsule with rounded tops, typical of Cheiridopsis subgenus Odontophoroides.	Figure 7. Capsules in Conophytum and Cheiridopsis. (A) Closed simple capsule of Conophytum wettsteinii; (B) open simple capsule of C.wettsteiniishowingthe absenceof covering membranesandclosing bodies;(C)closed multilocular capsuleof Cheiridopsis denticulata; (D) open capsule of C. denticulata showing the complex internal structures, i.e. covering membranes (cm) and closing bodies (cb), indicated by the white arrows; (E) decumbent capsules of Cheiridopsis subgenus Cheiridopsis, in Cheiridopsis namaquensis; (F) erect capsule of C. denticulata with flat to centrally elevated tops as in Cheiridopsis subgenus Aequifoliae; (G) Cheiridopsis pilosula illustrating the erect capsule with rounded tops, typical of Cheiridopsis subgenus Odontophoroides.	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCFFFE271DDA1DFE814ADA4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868512/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868512	Figure 8. Leaf and floral characters of Cheiridopsis and Conophytum. (A) New leaves of Conophytum wettsteinii breaking out of their papery sheath, with a magenta flower; (B) partial sheath enclosing the emerging leaf pair, with a magenta flower, in Cheiridopsis glomerata; (C) leaves of Cheiridopsis meyeri completely enclosed by a white papery sheath during the dormant period, indicated by the arrow; (D) leaves of Conophytum uviforme completely enclosed in a sheath during the dormant period, indicated by the arrow; (E) Cheiridopsis purpurea with the partial sheath, common to many Cheiridopsis spp. which only encloses part of the leaves during the dormant period; (F) Cheiridopsis aspera with the prominent rough leaf surface often found in subgenus Odontophoroides.	Figure 8. Leaf and floral characters of Cheiridopsis and Conophytum. (A) New leaves of Conophytum wettsteinii breaking out of their papery sheath, with a magenta flower; (B) partial sheath enclosing the emerging leaf pair, with a magenta flower, in Cheiridopsis glomerata; (C) leaves of Cheiridopsis meyeri completely enclosed by a white papery sheath during the dormant period, indicated by the arrow; (D) leaves of Conophytum uviforme completely enclosed in a sheath during the dormant period, indicated by the arrow; (E) Cheiridopsis purpurea with the partial sheath, common to many Cheiridopsis spp. which only encloses part of the leaves during the dormant period; (F) Cheiridopsis aspera with the prominent rough leaf surface often found in subgenus Odontophoroides.	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCFFFE271DDA1DFE814ADA4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868506/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868506	Figure 6. Number of species per quarter degree square (QDS) (Leistner & Morris, 1976) and distribution of Cheiridopsis s.l. and subgenera (as treated in the taxonomic treatment) in the Greater Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. (A) Distribution and number of species per QDS for Cheiridopsis s.l.; (B) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Cheiridopsis; (C) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Odontophoroides (including species of previously recognized Odontophorus); (D) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Aequifoliae (including species of previously recognized Ihlenfeldtia).	Figure 6. Number of species per quarter degree square (QDS) (Leistner & Morris, 1976) and distribution of Cheiridopsis s.l. and subgenera (as treated in the taxonomic treatment) in the Greater Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. (A) Distribution and number of species per QDS for Cheiridopsis s.l.; (B) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Cheiridopsis; (C) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Odontophoroides (including species of previously recognized Odontophorus); (D) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Aequifoliae (including species of previously recognized Ihlenfeldtia).	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCFFFE37265A3ABEDDBACE6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868504/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868504	Figure 5. Character reconstruction of pedicel position and shape of capsule top in the Conophytum clade on the majorityrule consensus tree from the Bayesian inference analysis. (A) pedicel position (Character 5; Appendices 4 and 5), reconstructed in two steps coded as erect or decumbent (Fig. 7E–G); (B) the shape of the capsule top (Character 6; Appendices 4 and 5), reconstructed in one step, coded as convex to rounded (Fig. 7E, G) or flat (to centrally elevated) (Fig. 7G).	Figure 5. Character reconstruction of pedicel position and shape of capsule top in the Conophytum clade on the majorityrule consensus tree from the Bayesian inference analysis. (A) pedicel position (Character 5; Appendices 4 and 5), reconstructed in two steps coded as erect or decumbent (Fig. 7E–G); (B) the shape of the capsule top (Character 6; Appendices 4 and 5), reconstructed in one step, coded as convex to rounded (Fig. 7E, G) or flat (to centrally elevated) (Fig. 7G).	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCFFFE37265A3ABEDDBACE6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868510/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868510	Figure 7. Capsules in Conophytum and Cheiridopsis. (A) Closed simple capsule of Conophytum wettsteinii; (B) open simple capsule of C.wettsteiniishowingthe absenceof covering membranesandclosing bodies;(C)closed multilocular capsuleof Cheiridopsis denticulata; (D) open capsule of C. denticulata showing the complex internal structures, i.e. covering membranes (cm) and closing bodies (cb), indicated by the white arrows; (E) decumbent capsules of Cheiridopsis subgenus Cheiridopsis, in Cheiridopsis namaquensis; (F) erect capsule of C. denticulata with flat to centrally elevated tops as in Cheiridopsis subgenus Aequifoliae; (G) Cheiridopsis pilosula illustrating the erect capsule with rounded tops, typical of Cheiridopsis subgenus Odontophoroides.	Figure 7. Capsules in Conophytum and Cheiridopsis. (A) Closed simple capsule of Conophytum wettsteinii; (B) open simple capsule of C.wettsteiniishowingthe absenceof covering membranesandclosing bodies;(C)closed multilocular capsuleof Cheiridopsis denticulata; (D) open capsule of C. denticulata showing the complex internal structures, i.e. covering membranes (cm) and closing bodies (cb), indicated by the white arrows; (E) decumbent capsules of Cheiridopsis subgenus Cheiridopsis, in Cheiridopsis namaquensis; (F) erect capsule of C. denticulata with flat to centrally elevated tops as in Cheiridopsis subgenus Aequifoliae; (G) Cheiridopsis pilosula illustrating the erect capsule with rounded tops, typical of Cheiridopsis subgenus Odontophoroides.	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCFFFE37265A3ABEDDBACE6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868512/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868512	Figure 8. Leaf and floral characters of Cheiridopsis and Conophytum. (A) New leaves of Conophytum wettsteinii breaking out of their papery sheath, with a magenta flower; (B) partial sheath enclosing the emerging leaf pair, with a magenta flower, in Cheiridopsis glomerata; (C) leaves of Cheiridopsis meyeri completely enclosed by a white papery sheath during the dormant period, indicated by the arrow; (D) leaves of Conophytum uviforme completely enclosed in a sheath during the dormant period, indicated by the arrow; (E) Cheiridopsis purpurea with the partial sheath, common to many Cheiridopsis spp. which only encloses part of the leaves during the dormant period; (F) Cheiridopsis aspera with the prominent rough leaf surface often found in subgenus Odontophoroides.	Figure 8. Leaf and floral characters of Cheiridopsis and Conophytum. (A) New leaves of Conophytum wettsteinii breaking out of their papery sheath, with a magenta flower; (B) partial sheath enclosing the emerging leaf pair, with a magenta flower, in Cheiridopsis glomerata; (C) leaves of Cheiridopsis meyeri completely enclosed by a white papery sheath during the dormant period, indicated by the arrow; (D) leaves of Conophytum uviforme completely enclosed in a sheath during the dormant period, indicated by the arrow; (E) Cheiridopsis purpurea with the partial sheath, common to many Cheiridopsis spp. which only encloses part of the leaves during the dormant period; (F) Cheiridopsis aspera with the prominent rough leaf surface often found in subgenus Odontophoroides.	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCFFFE37265A3ABEDDBACE6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868506/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868506	Figure 6. Number of species per quarter degree square (QDS) (Leistner & Morris, 1976) and distribution of Cheiridopsis s.l. and subgenera (as treated in the taxonomic treatment) in the Greater Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. (A) Distribution and number of species per QDS for Cheiridopsis s.l.; (B) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Cheiridopsis; (C) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Odontophoroides (including species of previously recognized Odontophorus); (D) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Aequifoliae (including species of previously recognized Ihlenfeldtia).	Figure 6. Number of species per quarter degree square (QDS) (Leistner & Morris, 1976) and distribution of Cheiridopsis s.l. and subgenera (as treated in the taxonomic treatment) in the Greater Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. (A) Distribution and number of species per QDS for Cheiridopsis s.l.; (B) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Cheiridopsis; (C) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Odontophoroides (including species of previously recognized Odontophorus); (D) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Aequifoliae (including species of previously recognized Ihlenfeldtia).	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCEFFE371EFA2F7E8A9ADF8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868504/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868504	Figure 5. Character reconstruction of pedicel position and shape of capsule top in the Conophytum clade on the majorityrule consensus tree from the Bayesian inference analysis. (A) pedicel position (Character 5; Appendices 4 and 5), reconstructed in two steps coded as erect or decumbent (Fig. 7E–G); (B) the shape of the capsule top (Character 6; Appendices 4 and 5), reconstructed in one step, coded as convex to rounded (Fig. 7E, G) or flat (to centrally elevated) (Fig. 7G).	Figure 5. Character reconstruction of pedicel position and shape of capsule top in the Conophytum clade on the majorityrule consensus tree from the Bayesian inference analysis. (A) pedicel position (Character 5; Appendices 4 and 5), reconstructed in two steps coded as erect or decumbent (Fig. 7E–G); (B) the shape of the capsule top (Character 6; Appendices 4 and 5), reconstructed in one step, coded as convex to rounded (Fig. 7E, G) or flat (to centrally elevated) (Fig. 7G).	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCEFFE371EFA2F7E8A9ADF8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868510/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868510	Figure 7. Capsules in Conophytum and Cheiridopsis. (A) Closed simple capsule of Conophytum wettsteinii; (B) open simple capsule of C.wettsteiniishowingthe absenceof covering membranesandclosing bodies;(C)closed multilocular capsuleof Cheiridopsis denticulata; (D) open capsule of C. denticulata showing the complex internal structures, i.e. covering membranes (cm) and closing bodies (cb), indicated by the white arrows; (E) decumbent capsules of Cheiridopsis subgenus Cheiridopsis, in Cheiridopsis namaquensis; (F) erect capsule of C. denticulata with flat to centrally elevated tops as in Cheiridopsis subgenus Aequifoliae; (G) Cheiridopsis pilosula illustrating the erect capsule with rounded tops, typical of Cheiridopsis subgenus Odontophoroides.	Figure 7. Capsules in Conophytum and Cheiridopsis. (A) Closed simple capsule of Conophytum wettsteinii; (B) open simple capsule of C.wettsteiniishowingthe absenceof covering membranesandclosing bodies;(C)closed multilocular capsuleof Cheiridopsis denticulata; (D) open capsule of C. denticulata showing the complex internal structures, i.e. covering membranes (cm) and closing bodies (cb), indicated by the white arrows; (E) decumbent capsules of Cheiridopsis subgenus Cheiridopsis, in Cheiridopsis namaquensis; (F) erect capsule of C. denticulata with flat to centrally elevated tops as in Cheiridopsis subgenus Aequifoliae; (G) Cheiridopsis pilosula illustrating the erect capsule with rounded tops, typical of Cheiridopsis subgenus Odontophoroides.	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
287EB65BFFCEFFE371EFA2F7E8A9ADF8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7868506/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7868506	Figure 6. Number of species per quarter degree square (QDS) (Leistner & Morris, 1976) and distribution of Cheiridopsis s.l. and subgenera (as treated in the taxonomic treatment) in the Greater Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. (A) Distribution and number of species per QDS for Cheiridopsis s.l.; (B) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Cheiridopsis; (C) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Odontophoroides (including species of previously recognized Odontophorus); (D) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Aequifoliae (including species of previously recognized Ihlenfeldtia).	Figure 6. Number of species per quarter degree square (QDS) (Leistner & Morris, 1976) and distribution of Cheiridopsis s.l. and subgenera (as treated in the taxonomic treatment) in the Greater Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. (A) Distribution and number of species per QDS for Cheiridopsis s.l.; (B) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Cheiridopsis; (C) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Odontophoroides (including species of previously recognized Odontophorus); (D) distribution and number of species per QDS in subgenus Aequifoliae (including species of previously recognized Ihlenfeldtia).	2017-07-27	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.		Zenodo	biologists	Powell, Robyn F.;Boatwright, James S.;Klak, Cornelia;Magee, Anthony R.			
