taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
FB2E87F3FFAD4F5DFF00DD5EF7FE8E54.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3385621/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3385621	FIGURES 1–5. Gyrodactylus decemmaculati n. sp. 1. Whole specimen. 2. Haptor. 3. Marginal hook. 4. Male copulatory organs. 5. Anchor.	FIGURES 1–5. Gyrodactylus decemmaculati n. sp. 1. Whole specimen. 2. Haptor. 3. Marginal hook. 4. Male copulatory organs. 5. Anchor.	2019-09-04	Vega, Rocio;Razzolini, Emanuel;Arbetman, Marina;Viozzi, Gustavo		Zenodo	biologists	Vega, Rocio;Razzolini, Emanuel;Arbetman, Marina;Viozzi, Gustavo			
FB2E87F3FFAD4F5DFF00DD5EF7FE8E54.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3385625/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3385625	FIGURES 11–12. Comparison of marginal hook hooklets among the two new species from Patagonia Argentina (solid line) and the most similar neotropical Gyrodactylus especies (broken line). 11. Gyrodactylus decemmaculati n. sp. and the overlapping hooklets. 12. Gyrodactylus breviradix n. sp. and the overlapping hooklets.	FIGURES 11–12. Comparison of marginal hook hooklets among the two new species from Patagonia Argentina (solid line) and the most similar neotropical Gyrodactylus especies (broken line). 11. Gyrodactylus decemmaculati n. sp. and the overlapping hooklets. 12. Gyrodactylus breviradix n. sp. and the overlapping hooklets.	2019-09-04	Vega, Rocio;Razzolini, Emanuel;Arbetman, Marina;Viozzi, Gustavo		Zenodo	biologists	Vega, Rocio;Razzolini, Emanuel;Arbetman, Marina;Viozzi, Gustavo			
FB2E87F3FFAB4F51FF00DB8EF2278CBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3385623/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3385623	FIGURES 6–10. Gyrodactylus breviradix n. sp. 6. Whole specimen. 7. Haptor. 8. Marginal hook. 9. Male copulatory organs. 10. Anchor.	FIGURES 6–10. Gyrodactylus breviradix n. sp. 6. Whole specimen. 7. Haptor. 8. Marginal hook. 9. Male copulatory organs. 10. Anchor.	2019-09-04	Vega, Rocio;Razzolini, Emanuel;Arbetman, Marina;Viozzi, Gustavo		Zenodo	biologists	Vega, Rocio;Razzolini, Emanuel;Arbetman, Marina;Viozzi, Gustavo			
FB2E87F3FFAB4F51FF00DB8EF2278CBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3385625/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3385625	FIGURES 11–12. Comparison of marginal hook hooklets among the two new species from Patagonia Argentina (solid line) and the most similar neotropical Gyrodactylus especies (broken line). 11. Gyrodactylus decemmaculati n. sp. and the overlapping hooklets. 12. Gyrodactylus breviradix n. sp. and the overlapping hooklets.	FIGURES 11–12. Comparison of marginal hook hooklets among the two new species from Patagonia Argentina (solid line) and the most similar neotropical Gyrodactylus especies (broken line). 11. Gyrodactylus decemmaculati n. sp. and the overlapping hooklets. 12. Gyrodactylus breviradix n. sp. and the overlapping hooklets.	2019-09-04	Vega, Rocio;Razzolini, Emanuel;Arbetman, Marina;Viozzi, Gustavo		Zenodo	biologists	Vega, Rocio;Razzolini, Emanuel;Arbetman, Marina;Viozzi, Gustavo			
FB2E87F3FFAB4F51FF00DB8EF2278CBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3385627/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3385627	FIGURE 13. Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model. The tree with the highest log likelihood (- 3376.1634) is shown and distances were estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. Branch lengths are measured as the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 25 nucleotide sequences.	FIGURE 13. Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model. The tree with the highest log likelihood (- 3376.1634) is shown and distances were estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. Branch lengths are measured as the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 25 nucleotide sequences.	2019-09-04	Vega, Rocio;Razzolini, Emanuel;Arbetman, Marina;Viozzi, Gustavo		Zenodo	biologists	Vega, Rocio;Razzolini, Emanuel;Arbetman, Marina;Viozzi, Gustavo			
FB2E87F3FFAB4F51FF00DB8EF2278CBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3385629/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3385629	FIGURE 14. Blue line: Distribution of pairwise distance comparisons within species of gyrodactylids (without putative new ones) and between species (red line). Black dots represent de pairwise distance of newly proposed species (intraspecific), and green dots represent the pairwise comparisons of putative species with other gyrodactylids (interespecific).	FIGURE 14. Blue line: Distribution of pairwise distance comparisons within species of gyrodactylids (without putative new ones) and between species (red line). Black dots represent de pairwise distance of newly proposed species (intraspecific), and green dots represent the pairwise comparisons of putative species with other gyrodactylids (interespecific).	2019-09-04	Vega, Rocio;Razzolini, Emanuel;Arbetman, Marina;Viozzi, Gustavo		Zenodo	biologists	Vega, Rocio;Razzolini, Emanuel;Arbetman, Marina;Viozzi, Gustavo			
