identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03CADA053B3BED73FDB2F88D8E7BAAA6.text	03CADA053B3BED73FDB2F88D8E7BAAA6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rudisculptus Dubey 2021	<div><p>Genus Rudisculptus Dubey gen. nov.</p> <p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 78F3AF0A-7736-4AB7-BDE5-8223B3DB36C9</p> <p>Type species</p> <p>Rudisculptus caudalis gen. et sp. nov.; by present designation and monotypy. Gender: masculine.</p> <p>Diagnosis (Figs 2–6)</p> <p>In life, puparia black; without secretion of wax over dorsum, wax secretions are seen around caudal tracheal pore; elevated by lateral submargin; submargin merging with subdorsum by a ridge at dorsolateral angle; submargin hidden in dorsal aspect (Figs 2, 5B). Dorsal surface ornamented with reticulated network of tubercles. Submarginal bands of microtubercles present. Laterally elevated submargin expands and folds in mounted puparia and thus, placing the true margin ventrally. Thoracic tracheal pores indicated as small openings at true margin, and marked as deep loops on dorsal submargin, filled with fine microtubercles. Longitudinal moulting suture reaching margin and transverse moulting sutures reaching subdorsal-submarginal demarcation, cephalothorax separated from the submargin in mounted specimens (Fig. 4G); cephalothoracic and abdominal segment sutures reaching submedian area. Anterior marginal setae absent and posterior marginal setae located ventrally on true margin. Cephalic, first, eighth abdominal and caudal setae present, caudal setae located at ventrolateral margin. Vasiform orifice subcordate; operculum covering little more than half the length of the orifice; lingula exposed, tonguelike, tip may reach beyond the margin of the orifice. Caudal furrow prominent. Geminate pores present. Ventral submargin marked with a narrow groove except caudal fold area.</p> <p>Etymology</p> <p>The genus epithet is a summative of two Latin words ‘ rudis ʼ and ‘ sculptus ʼ meaning ‘rough’ and ‘sculpted’ attributing to the dorsal surface of puparium seen in the SEM images (Fig. 5B).</p> <p>Remarks</p> <p>Puparia of the new genus differ from those of Aleuropleurocelus and Tetralicia Harrison, 1917 in having a smooth true margin and the presence of first abdominal setae, with thoracic tracheal pores indicated at the margin, prominent caudal furrow, a differentiated cephalothorax in some slide mounts, the submargin is demarcated from the dorsal disc at the anterolateral angle by a shallow ridge, the subventral area is demarcated from the narrow submarginal area by a shallow groove, and the thoracic and caudal tracheal folds are not marked with spinules. In the new genus, the inner wall of the vasiform orifice has digitiform projections, the thoracic tracheal pores are clearly indicated at the margin with an extended loop on the submargin, filled with microtubercles and lacking submarginal wax secreting glands, but in Aleuropleurocelus, the inner wall of the vasiform orifice is smooth, the tracheal pore areas are not modified at the margin and the marginal teeth have wax glands at the base. The new genus also differs from Regiominutus Dubey, 2020 in the puparial shape, size, vasiform orifice structure, and in lacking submarginal papillae and a ventral submarginal groove. A comparison of pupal morphological characters with related genera are presented in Table 1.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CADA053B3BED73FDB2F88D8E7BAAA6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Dubey, Anil Kumar	Dubey, Anil Kumar (2021): New whitefly genus and species (Hemiptera, Aleyrodidae) breeding on Orophea katschallica Kurz in India. European Journal of Taxonomy 787: 1-16, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.787.1609, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.787.1609
03CADA053B3AED7DFD83F9978C6BAD5F.text	03CADA053B3AED7DFD83F9978C6BAD5F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rudisculptus caudalis Dubey 2021	<div><p>Rudisculptus caudalis Dubey gen. et sp. nov.</p> <p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 68BF5111-D73A-4C39-B082-80E305AE1FAF</p> <p>Figs 2–6</p> <p>Diagnosis</p> <p>Puparia of the new whitefly are characterised by the following combination of characters: smooth margin, elevated submargin, tuberculate/rugose dorsum, presence of first abdominal setae, demarcated cephalothorax, tracheal pores, caudal furrow, exposed lingula and lacking the submarginal wax glands.</p> <p>Etymology</p> <p>The species epithet is a Latin word ‘ caudalis ʼ meaning ‘caudalʼ, attributing to the caudal furrow.</p> <p>Type material</p> <p>Holotype INDIA • ♀; puparium, on slide; Andaman and Nicobar Islands, North Andaman, Diglipur, Table Delgarno Island; 13º24.46.88′ N, 93º 05.18.43 ′ E; alt. 9 m; 22 Oct. 2017; A.K. Dubey leg.; on Orophea katschallica; 14690 (1); ANRC-ZSI.</p> <p>Paratypes INDIA • 8 puparia on 6 slides; same collection data as for holotype; NZC • 3 puparia on 1 slide; same collection data as for preceding; NFIC-FRI • 1 puparium on 1 slide; same collection data as for preceding; NHM • 3 puparia on three slides; same collection data as for preceding; 14690 (2–4); ANRC- ZSI.</p> <p>Description</p> <p>PUPARIUM. Black; oval; prominently elevated above from lateral margin (Fig. 5A); without secretion of wax over dorsal disc or margin, small amount of wax at tracheal pore opening areas present (Fig. 2); broadest at first abdominal segment region (Fig. 5B); 680–720 µm long, 580–610 µm wide, including folded submargin; found singly on underside of leaves; 1–2 puparia per leaf.</p> <p>MARGIN. True margin merging with slightly smaller ventral surface and placed below folded submargin; smooth; thoracic tracheal pore opening areas marked as small pores; loop with microtubercles / granules on submargin prominent at each thoracic tracheal pore opening area (Figs 3C, 4D). Caudal tracheal pore opening cannot be stated with confidence in slide mounts as submargin folds ventrally and posterior end break in middle of caudal furrow, forming pseudo-caudal pore, but clearly visible in SEM image (Fig. 6G). Anterior marginal setae absent. Posterior marginal setae present on true margin, placed ventrally (Fig. 6G).</p> <p>DORSUM. Entire dorsal surface ornamented with tuberculate cells except submedian area of abdominal segments. Dorsal surface slightly larger than ventral surface, merging with submargin at dorsolateral angle (Fig. 5A), and submargin is connecting with ventral surface through inwardly directed raised submargin (Fig. 6E); raised submargin 67–80 µm wide. Submargin expands outwards in slide mounts thus, loops on submargin, near thoracic tracheal pore, appear inversely oriented (inside-out) and pore opening area at true margin remains obscured (Fig. 4C), and their (pores/loops) orientations were confirmed through dissection of a few puparia (Fig. 4D). Submarginal ridges prominent. Caudal tracheal furrow present. Longitudinal moulting suture reaching margin. Transverse moulting sutures turning anteriorly and usually entirely separating two halves of cephalothorax (Fig. 4G) or terminating opposite to mesothorax on subdorsal area in a few puparia. Cephalothoracic and abdominal segment sutures reaching subdorsum. Median length of cephalothorax and abdomen 345–355 and 345–360 µm long, respectively. Mesothorax 32–38 µm and metathorax 25–28 µm long, medially. Abdominal segment VII not reduced in middle length and almost equal to segment VI. Median length of abdominal segments VI– VIII (A6–A8): A6: 25, A7: 17–20, A8: 30–35 µm long. Median tubercles present on abdominal segment I–VI. Submedian pockets and depressions may be recognized by spacing of microtubercles on segment sutures or inter-segmental spaces. Vasiform orifice inset from posterior apparent margin of pupal case by its own length. Caudal furrow present, 37–40 µm long excluding folded submargin, 50–80 µm long including folded submargin. Geminate pores present in four rows, two rows on submedian area and one row each on subdorsum and submargin; submarginal row of pores placed along true margin, more in number, 29–30 pairs (9–10 pairs on cephalothorax, 19–21 pairs on abdomen); submarginal row of geminate pores appear subdorsal in slide mounted puparia due to folding of submargin. Pore-porette spacing equal to or less than the diameter of large pore itself. Pockets continuous.</p> <p>VASIFORM ORIFICE. Subcordate; inner margin with row of many digitiform projections; 35–40 µm long, 35–38 µm wide; operculum subcordate, dorsal surface with a few punctures, dorsal apical end with tuft of microtrichia and underside with many microtrichia, 22–28 µm long, 22–25 µm wide; almost entirely covering orifice. Lingula setose, exposed, elongate, tip reaching outside orifice, base with pair of thick setae (Figs 3D, 5F).</p> <p>VENTER. Smaller than dorsal surface. Prominent shallow submarginal groove /fold differentiating subventral area from ventral submargin. Thoracic tracheal folds present, without stipples (Fig. 6E– F). Caudal tracheal fold present. Paired ventral eighth abdominal setae present (Fig. 6G). Antennae extending through inside prothoracic legs, reaching near base of prothoracic legs (Fig. 4C). Apical pads, adhesive sacs and spiracles visible.</p> <p>CHAETOTAXY. Cephalic, first, eighth abdominal and caudal setae 22–28, 17–38, 20–28 and 38–65 µm long, respectively. Cephalic and first abdominal setae capitate (Fig. 6D). Caudal setae located on posterolateral submargin merging with dorsal surface.</p> <p>Host plant</p> <p>Annonaceae: Orophea katschallica Kurz.</p> <p>Distribution</p> <p>India: Andaman and Nicobar Islands, North Andaman.</p> <p>Remarks</p> <p>In life, puparia of the new species are seen without secretion of wax around the margin, except tracheal pore openings, but in A. ceanothi the wax threads originate from the true margin located ventrally (Fig. 7A–B). The ventral surface was smaller or equal to the dorsal surface, excluding the submargin. Populations of the puparia of the new taxa were very low on leaves, only one or two puparia were observed per leaf; puparia easily get detached from leaves in transport; hard in nature and break-down during mounting. The type locality of the new species, Table Delgarno Island, is a small island, prone to rain and heavy winds throughout the year, and this could be a reason for smaller populations of the new taxa. No whitefly adults and ants in attendance were observed in the field. The differences in morphological characters from related genera, geographical isolation of type locality and association with an endemic host plant indicate that the new genus may be native to and distributed in the Oriental Region only.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CADA053B3AED7DFD83F9978C6BAD5F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Dubey, Anil Kumar	Dubey, Anil Kumar (2021): New whitefly genus and species (Hemiptera, Aleyrodidae) breeding on Orophea katschallica Kurz in India. European Journal of Taxonomy 787: 1-16, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.787.1609, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.787.1609
