taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03A987BAFFF0775AB620FD9CBE89026A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8377726/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8377726	Fig. 2a–j. Images of Epistylis camprubii, in vivo. a–b – example of colonies; c–d – two examples of extended zooids; e – zooid during conjugation; f – conjugation; g – contracted zooid; h–j – images of the stalk and branches, from smoother and larger to shorter and thicker. Scale bars: 25 µm.	Fig. 2a–j. Images of Epistylis camprubii, in vivo. a–b – example of colonies; c–d – two examples of extended zooids; e – zooid during conjugation; f – conjugation; g – contracted zooid; h–j – images of the stalk and branches, from smoother and larger to shorter and thicker. Scale bars: 25 µm.	2016-12-31	Canals, Oriol;Salvadó, Humbert		Zenodo	biologists	Canals, Oriol;Salvadó, Humbert			
03A987BAFFF0775AB620FD9CBE89026A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8356881/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8356881	Fig. 4. Frequency of the number of zooids per colony observed in Epistylis camprubii colonies (number of analyzed colonies = 71).	Fig. 4. Frequency of the number of zooids per colony observed in Epistylis camprubii colonies (number of analyzed colonies = 71).	2016-12-31	Canals, Oriol;Salvadó, Humbert		Zenodo	biologists	Canals, Oriol;Salvadó, Humbert			
03A987BAFFF0775AB620FD9CBE89026A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8356877/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8356877	Fig. 1a–d. Morphological and oral infraciliature details of Epistylis camprubii. a – detail of the zooid. PD – peristomial disk; PL – peristomial lip; CV – contractile vacuole; Ma – macronucleus; Mi – micronucleus; b – scheme of a colony; c – oral infraciliature. Pk – polykinety; H – haplokinety; G – germinal kinety; P1 – polykinety 1; P2 – polykinety 2; P3 – polykinety 3; d – morphological characteristics measured. PDd – peristomial disk diameter; PLw – peristomial lip width; PLh – peristomial lip height; Zl – zooid lenght; Zw – zooid width; Sw – stalk width. Scale bars: 25 µm.	Fig. 1a–d. Morphological and oral infraciliature details of Epistylis camprubii. a – detail of the zooid. PD – peristomial disk; PL – peristomial lip; CV – contractile vacuole; Ma – macronucleus; Mi – micronucleus; b – scheme of a colony; c – oral infraciliature. Pk – polykinety; H – haplokinety; G – germinal kinety; P1 – polykinety 1; P2 – polykinety 2; P3 – polykinety 3; d – morphological characteristics measured. PDd – peristomial disk diameter; PLw – peristomial lip width; PLh – peristomial lip height; Zl – zooid lenght; Zw – zooid width; Sw – stalk width. Scale bars: 25 µm.	2016-12-31	Canals, Oriol;Salvadó, Humbert		Zenodo	biologists	Canals, Oriol;Salvadó, Humbert			
03A987BAFFF0775AB620FD9CBE89026A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8356879/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8356879	Fig. 3a–e. Images of Epistylis camprubii, after silver staining method. a – view of the longitudinal fibers and the oral infraciliature; b – detail of the aboral trochal band of a feeding zooid; c – aboral trochal band of a zooid during swimmer formation; d–e – oral infraciliature details. H – haplokinety; G – germinal kinety; Pk – polykinety; P1 – polykinety 1; P2 – polykinety 2; P3 – polykinety 3. Scale bars: 15 µm.	Fig. 3a–e. Images of Epistylis camprubii, after silver staining method. a – view of the longitudinal fibers and the oral infraciliature; b – detail of the aboral trochal band of a feeding zooid; c – aboral trochal band of a zooid during swimmer formation; d–e – oral infraciliature details. H – haplokinety; G – germinal kinety; Pk – polykinety; P1 – polykinety 1; P2 – polykinety 2; P3 – polykinety 3. Scale bars: 15 µm.	2016-12-31	Canals, Oriol;Salvadó, Humbert		Zenodo	biologists	Canals, Oriol;Salvadó, Humbert			
03A987BAFFF0775AB620FD9CBE89026A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8356883/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8356883	Fig. 5. The preferred 18s rRNA tree under maximum likelihood (ML). Rectangles on branches denote the support recovered in analyses under alternative inference methods. Left rectangle refers to maximum likelihood (ML), the middle one to Bayesian inference (BI) and the right one to maximum parsimony (MP). Black coloured rectangle indicates bootstrap support> 80 or posterior probability> 0.95, grey rectangle indicates clade recovered but with lower support than the former values, and white rectangle indicates the clade was not recovered. Main Epistylis clade boxed.	Fig. 5. The preferred 18s rRNA tree under maximum likelihood (ML). Rectangles on branches denote the support recovered in analyses under alternative inference methods. Left rectangle refers to maximum likelihood (ML), the middle one to Bayesian inference (BI) and the right one to maximum parsimony (MP). Black coloured rectangle indicates bootstrap support> 80 or posterior probability> 0.95, grey rectangle indicates clade recovered but with lower support than the former values, and white rectangle indicates the clade was not recovered. Main Epistylis clade boxed.	2016-12-31	Canals, Oriol;Salvadó, Humbert		Zenodo	biologists	Canals, Oriol;Salvadó, Humbert			
