taxonID	type	description	language	source
FE0EFE3F3A5EFFFC1FBF0BE5FB703D65.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — COLOMBIA. Boyacá. Nr. Soatá, Apr. 1843, Linden 1322 (holotype LE 00004360, image!; isotypes BR 0000006996383, image!; F 0055431, image!; G, K 000494458, image!, K 000494459, image!, L 0006611, image!, MPU 011519, image!; NY 00010131, image!, P 007715899, image!, US 00116786, image!, W).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A5EFFFC1FBF0BE5FB703D65.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — COLOMBIA. Magdalena: Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, below, “ El Manon ” ca. 2100 m elevation, blooming 26 Feb. 1928, A. G. R. Schultze 1113 (holotype B †). Neotype: — COLOMBIA. Magdalena: San Sebastían de Rábago, R. Romero-Castañeda 867 (COL 000421468, here designated, image!; isoneotype US 02973529!).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A5EFFFC1FBF0BE5FB703D65.taxon	discussion	Note: — Leucothoë columbiana was published as a new species by Sleumer (1935), and later synonymized by him (Sleumer 1959) under L. albilfora. The type of L. columbiana is the collection A. G. R. Schultze 1113, originally deposited in the Berlin-Dahlem herbarium (B) and later destroyed by the fire in 1943. Posteriorly, the American species of Leucothoë were recombined in Agarista by Judd (1979, 1984), and L. columbiana, was regarded as a heterotypic synonym of Agarista albiflora. The paratype A. Schultze 1447 is indicated in the protologue and was also deposited in the Berlin-Dahlem herbarium (B), later destroyed too. In TL II (Stafleu & Cowan 2022), the herbaria usually used by A. G. R. Schultze for depositing materials and types are considered unknown. Thus, no remaining original material has been found so far. “ El Manon ” refers to an indigenous community below Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Magdalena, Colombia. In Romero-Castañeda 867 of Leucothoë columbiana (COL 000421468, US 02973529), it is indicated that the specimen was “ recollected ” in Magdalena, San Sebastían de Rábago, a location below Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, at about 2000 – 2100 m above sea level. There is not enough information to infer with certainty if that locality corresponds to the original indicated in the protologue of L. columbiana, and if the indication of “ recollected ” refers to the collector’s intention to inform that it represents the same species collected by Shultze 1113 or 1447. Anyway, this collection of L. columbiana represents the best available specimen collected at the closest location as the holotype collection site and agrees with the circumscription of Ag. albiflora, the accepted name for L. columbina. Therefore, we designated the specimen sheet COL 000421468 as the neotype of the name Leucothoë columbiana following Arts. 9.8 and 9.11 of the ICN (Turland et al., 2018) to fix the application of the name and to preserve the usage established by the previous typification according to Art. 9.16 (Turland et al., 2018).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A5FFFFC1FBF0C1FFF203A8D.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Pinheiro, nr. Biribiri, 26 Mar 1892, A. F. M. Glaziou 19582 (lectotype P 00715901, image!, here designated; isolectotypes BR 0000006996079, image!, F 0055214, fragment!, F 0055215!, G 00390579, image!, IAN 094294, image!, K 000494457, image!, MO 0345490!, NY 00008172!, P 00715900, image!, P 00715902, image!; the former lectotype B †, designated by Sleumer 1959: 451).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A5FFFFC1FBF0C1FFF203A8D.taxon	discussion	Note: — The remaining original material of Glaziou 19582 consists of 10 specimens (BR 0000006996079, F 0055214 F, F 0055215 F, G, IAN 094294, K 000494457, MO- 345490, NY 00008172, P 00715901, P 00715902). We also consulted the herbarium R, which has many Glaziou type specimens, nonetheless, no duplicate of this collections was found. Taubert (1893) published A. angustissima with the collection Glaziou 19582 as the type of the species. According to the TL II (Stafleu & Cowan 2022), the collection numbers Glaziou 3267 - 22770 were deposited in B and the collection Glaziou 19582 deposited in there was destroyed by the fire. Sleumer (1959) included the species of Agarista in Leucothoë sect. Agastia and combined the name A. angustissima as L. angustissima, assuming the B † specimen as “ Holotype ”, and indicated the location of some isotypes (BR, K, NY, P), beyond the so-called “ Holotype fragment ” at F. Judd (1984, 1995), who reestablished Agarista at generic rank, kept the designation of the holotype at B †, and indicated additional isotypes at G and MO. According to the Art. 7.11, Ex. 13 of the ICN (Turland el al. 2018), Sleumer (1959) designated the B † specimen as the lectotype. The remaining duplicate specimens became isolectotypes. As this lectotype was destroyed, according to the Art. 9.11 a new lectotype must be designated as its substitute. Therefore, we herein revised the isolectotypes and designate the specimen from P (P 00715901) as the lectotype of the name Agarista angustissima because it is well preserved, presents fruits and flowers, and is in accordance with the protologue. Furthermore, the label contains the correct information about the collection. Additionally, this material is available digitally in speciesLink (SPECIESLINK, 2022) and the digital herbarium database from P (MNHMP 2022).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A5FFFFB1FBF0BA7FB803EF1.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Serra dos Cristais, near Diamantina, 1892, A. F. M. Glaziou 19577 (lectotype K 000494453, image!, here designated; isolectotypes BR 0000006996413, image!, C 10010917, image!, F 0055216, fragment!, G 00390578, image!, L 0006627, image!, LE 00004365, image!, P 00715911, image!, P 00715909, image!, P 00715910, image!; the former lectotype B †, designated by Sleumer 1959: 450).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A5FFFFB1FBF0BA7FB803EF1.taxon	discussion	Note: — Taubert (1893) published Agarista ericoides but failed to mention a particular herbarium or specimen (McNeill, 2014). There are eight syntypes, being six entire sheets (K 000494453, BR 0000006996413, C 10010917, P 00715911, P 00715909, P 00715910), and fragments of the Berlin specimen at F (F 0055216 F) and L (L 0006627). We also consulted R, which maintains many Glaziou specimens, but no duplicate of this collection was found. Leucothoë ericoides (Taub.) Taubert ex Glaziou ([1910] 1905: 430) is not validly published according to Art. 34.1 of the ICN (Turland et al 2018), since the “ Plantae Brasiliae centralis a Glaziou lectae = Liste des plantes du Brésil central recueillies en 1861 – 1895 ” (Glaziou 1905) is a suppressed work (“ opera utique oppressa ”). Sleumer’s (1959) studies about Leucothoë, assumed B † as “ Holotype ” and indicated isotypes in BR, C, G, K, L, LE, and P, as well as a fragment at F. According to the Art. 7.11, Ex. 13 of the ICN (Turland el al. 2018), Sleumer (1959) indicated a lectotype. The remaining syntype specimens became isolectotypes. Judd (1984, 1995) followed this same pattern of type specimen designation. As this lectotype was destroyed, according to the Art. 9.11, a new lectotype must be designated as its substitute. Therefore, we are designating the specimen at K (K 000494453) as the lectotype of Agarista ericoides because the material is well conserved, matches the protologue presenting fruits, and is similar to the original B † type (see F photo 220518 [4582]). The Field negative photo could not assume a type status (Art. 9.4, Turland et al. 2018), but provided additional information that assisted in our selection of the lectotype, because it keeps some information from the original material. The material here selected as lectotype is available digitally in speciesLink (SPECIESLINK, 2022), and digital herbarium database from K (Kew 2022).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A58FFFA1FBF0FB3FB533D01.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Villa Rica [Ouro Preto], G. W. Freyreiss s. n. (holotype UPS V- 085230, image!).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A58FFFA1FBF0FB3FB533D01.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: without locality, F. Sellow s. n. (lectotype E 00326876, image!, here designated; isolectotypes G 00352129, image!, K 000494435, image!, L 0006621, fragment, image!, NY 00008203, fragment!; the former lectotype B †, designated by Sleumer 1959: 462).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A58FFFA1FBF0FB3FB533D01.taxon	discussion	Note: — The type specimen of the basionym Andromeda coriifolia was collected by George Wilhelm Freyreiss and posteriorly published by Carl Peter Thunberg in Plantarum Brasiliensium I (Thunberg 1817). As Moraes (2014) have already treated, the first ten species published in Plantarum Brasiliensium (Decas prima) were written by Thunberg and defended by Johan Immanuel Billberg. Some later publications have cited the taxonomic authority of the name Andromeda coriifolia as Thunberg and Billberg due to the authorship of Plantarum Brasiliensium. On the other hand, Moraes (2014) mentions that Thunberg wrote by himself the Plantarum Brasiliensium and this one was defended by a responder, and as this was a commonplace at the time, the taxonomic authority related to the names published in those dissertations must to be attributed to Thunberg and not to the respondent. Additionally, according to the Art. 46.6 of the ICN (Turland el al. 2018), the authorship of a publication is the authorship of the part of the publication in which the name appears, regardless of authorship or editorial of the publication as a whole. The material used to describe Andromeda neriifolia is the collection Sellow s. n., from “ Brasilia tropica, ” without date or location. In the protologue, Chamisso & Schlechtendal (1826: 522) did not indicate a single specimen or specify an herbarium of deposit. Thus, the specimens that comprise this collection should be considered syntypes (McNeill 2014). Sellow dispatched his collections to the Royal Botanical Garden at Sch ̂ neberg, now part of B (Urban 1893, Moraes 2020, Carvalho et al. 2022), and the specimens used to describe new species through his collections were probably deposited in B, but this information cannot be confirmed. Sellow also sent his specimens to R (Urban 1893), although we were not able to find any duplicate at R. The original material at B was later destroyed by the fire in 1943. The remaining syntypes consist of five specimens being three entire sheets (E 00326876, G 00352129, K 000494435) and two fragments (L 0006621 and NY 00008203). No lectotypification of this name was proposed until the present. Agarista coriifolia occurs in the states of Bahia, Goiás, Minas Gerais, and S ã o Paulo (Brazil), being most common in the southeast mountainous region between S ã o Paulo and Minas Gerais. According to Urban (1893), Friederich Sellow collected in this region between 1829 – 1831 in about 1500 distinct localities with simple, chronologically consecutive numbers written in pen or pencil with only some of them having detailed descriptions along with date and place, the later often generally accurate. Moreover, Sellow did not enclose all the associated information he had on these specimens, as local records and notes, when dispatching these collections (Moraes 2020, Carvalho et al. 2022). Therefore, the pattern used by Sellow to identify his collections was unknown at B and thus his duplicates were inconsistently labeled. As similar in many cases in Agarista, little information is present and provided with only scarce locality data, often only with the printed note “ Brasilia legit F. Sellow ” (Herter & Rambo 1953, Moraes 2008, Carvalho et al. 2022). Some similar cases were already indicated and discussed accordingly in Agarista (Dalastra & Heiden 2020). There is a lack of precise information concerning the Sellow collections, especially about the collection number and consequently the date and location. Based on the work of Urban (1893) and Carvalho et al. (2022), we know that until mid- 1830 these collections were made in the S ã o Paulo state, and until November 1831 in Minas Gerais state. From this information, we could infer the type specimen of Ag. neriifolia to be from Minas Gerais or S ã o Paulo and collected between 1829 to November 1831, although the precise date or location of the collection is not specified. Even in the protologue, the information about this collection is restricted to “ In Brasilia tropica legit Sellow ”. According to Carvalho et al. (2022), Sellow collection numbers for Minas Gerais are between the numbers 801 – 1450. Sleumer (1959) called the B † specimen as “ holotype ” and the remaining syntypes as “ isotypes. ” Judd (1984, 1995) followed this same pattern of type designation. According to Art. 7.11, Ex. 13 of the ICN (Turland el al. 2018), Sleumer (1959) designated the specimen at B † as the lectotype. The remaining syntypes specimens then became isolectotypes. As this lectotype was destroyed, according to the Art. 9.11, a new lectotype must be designated as its substitute. Therefore, we revised the isotypes previously indicated by Sleumer (1959) and Judd (1984, 1995), searched for additional duplicates in the herbaria where Sellow used to send his specimens and agreed with the duplicates previously indicated. Finally, following also the Art. 9.12, we designated one specimen from E (E 00326876) as the lectotype due to the material being well conserved and in accordance with the protologue. Additionally, the material here selected as lectotype is available in the digital herbarium database from E (RBGE 2022).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A59FFF81FBF0C23FB743C59.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — BRAZIL. Minas Gerais, Itambé [Itambé do Mato Dentro], F. Sellow 857 (lectotype G 00352006, image!, here designated; isolectotypes E 00326873 _ 6, image!, F 0055222, fragment!, K 000494437, image! K 000494441, image!, L 0006638, image!, L 0006639, image!; NY 00008243, fragment!; the former lectotype B †, designated by Sleumer 1959: 475).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A59FFF81FBF0C23FB743C59.taxon	discussion	Note on Agarista oleifolia: — Chamisso (1834: 504) described this species with short petiolate leaves, leaf blade oblong, flat, glabrous, with a subacuminate apex, axillary racemes as long as the leaves, calyx lobes acute acuminate, red oblong crimson corollas, glabrous bud, and indumentum of inflorescences and calyx varying from glabrous to hirsute. Sellow dispatched his collections to the Royal Botanical Garden at Sch ̂ neberg, now part of B (Urban 1893, Moraes 2020, Carvalho et al. 2022). The original material deposited at B was destroyed during WW II. The remaining syntypes consists of six entire specimens (E 00326873 _ 6, G 00352006, K 000494437, K 000494441, L 0006638, L 0006639) and two with fragments from the original material (F 0055222 F, NY 00008243). The material at NY is a mixed sheet mounted with assembled fragments of three different collections, all of them belonging to Agarista oleifolia. There is another sheet at HAL (HAL 098138) morphologically similar and comprising an equal label as L 0006638, which could be a duplicate from the original material; nonetheless, there is not enough information to confirm it as a syntype. In the protologue of Agarista oleifolia, Chamisso (1833: 504) do not cite a specific herbarium or collection number, only “ Sellow in schedula. ” G. Don (1834: 838) indicated the collection as “ Native of the equinoxial Brazil ”, followed by Candolle (1839: 605) as “ Brasilia aequitionalis ”. Sleumer (1959) retrieval the collection number (Sellow 857) and location (Minas Gerais, Itambé [Itambé do Mato Dentro]), whereas Judd (1984, 1995) kept the information about the location type, but not the collection number. We here keep both information indicated by Sleumer (1959) because the morphological variation indicated in the protologue (inflorescences with calyx varying from glabrous to with hirsute indumentum) is characteristic of plants of this species from the Itambé do Mato Dentro region. Additionally, according to Urban (1893), Sellow collected in Minas Gerais between mid- 1830 until November 1831 in about 1500 distinct localities. According to Carvalho et al. 2022, the Sellow collection numbers for Minas Gerais are between the numbers 801 – 1450, which matches with information retrieval by Sleumer (1959). Sleumer (1959) called the B † specimen as “ holotype ”, and the remaining duplicate specimens as “ isotypes ”. Judd (1984, 1995) followed this same pattern of type designation. According to the Art. 7.11, Ex. 13 of the ICN (Turland el al. 2018), Sleumer (1959) designated the B † specimen as the lectotype. The remaining duplicates then became isolectotypes. As this lectotype is no longer available, a new lectotype must be designated as its substitute (Art. 9.11). We designated the specimen G 00352006 as lectotype of Agarista oleifolia, following the Art. 9.12 of the ICN (Turland et al. 2018). We choose this specimen because it bears an original label from the Sellow collection at B †, with Sellow’s handwriting. The specimen is well preserved having both flowers and fruits, agrees with the protologue, and is available in the digital herbarium database through JSTOR Global Plants (JSTOR 2022). Note on Leucothoë ambigua var. peduncularis: — The syntypes of Gardner 4987 consist of 16 specimens, 13 entire sheets (E 00326872, F 0055436 F, G 00352018, GH 00015106, K 000494439, K 000494440, NY 00010135, NY 00010136, P 00715925, P 00715926, S 05 - 4186, US 00116787, W 0059348) and three sheets with fragments detached from the original main material (L 0006644, NY 00010160, NY 00010161). The specimens NY 00010160 and NY 00010161 have few fragments mounted together with NY 00010136. No additional material has been found at BM. No lectotypification of this name was proposed until the present. The type location of Leucothoë ambigua var. peduncularis, “ Serro do Frio ” (or “ Serro Frio ”), was the headquarters of the district of Serro do Frio in northeast of the captaincy of Minas Gerais at the time of the collection and it was later elevated to the category of city, with the name of Serro (indicated in the heading) in 1838 (Memória do Judiciário Mineiro, 2022). Gardner collected in Brazil between 1836 – 1841 and the original material is at BM. Robert James Shuttleworth used to correspond with Meissner, and the type material of L. ambigua var. peduncularis seems to have been part of the personal herbarium of Shuttleworth, one of the most significant botanical acquisitions ever made by BM, comprising around 170,000 specimens from several collectors around the world and contemporary botanists collecting in the first half of the 19 th century (Robert James Shuttleworth in JSTOR 2022). Originally, Sleumer (1959) indicated the holotype as deposited in the herbarium of The Natural History Museum (BM-Herb. Shuttleworth) and “ destroyed ”. According to Art. 7.11, Ex. 13 of the ICN (Turland el al. 2018), Sleumer (1959) designated the specimen at BM as the lectotype. The remaining syntypes specimens then became isolectotypes. This type status was sustained, but the information of it as being destroyed was considered doubtful by Judd (1984, 1995). Contacting the BM herbarium curator, no material referring to this collection was found in this herbarium. Therefore, we indicated it here as “ lost ”. As this lectotype is no longer available, a new lectotype must be designated as its substitute (Art. 9.11). We designated the specimen US 00116787 as lectotype (Art. 9.12). We choose this specimen because the availability of inflorescences and flowers, better representation of the racemes longer than leaves, the elongated pedicels and rachis and calyx with densely hispid glandular trichomes. The label of this specimen also has the collection number in Gardner’s handwriting. Additionally, this specimen is available in the digital herbarium database from US (US 2022) and through JSTOR Global Plants (JSTOR 2022). Note on Leucothoë ambigua var. longifolia: — This material was originally deposited in the BM-Herb. Shuttleworth. Sleumer (1959) indicated the holotype as deposited at BM-Herb. Shuttleworth as “ destroyed ”. The remaining syntypes include 10 entire specimens (E 00326874, F 0055435 F, G 00352024, K 000494444, K 000494445, NY 00010133, P 00715927, P 00715928, P 00715929, W 0059347) and one with fragments (L 0006637). No type material of this variety was found at BM. There are no previous indications in the revisions of Sleumer (1959) and Judd (1984, 1995) if the collections of Gardner 3876 were destroyed or lost and no duplicate material of this collection was found at BM. We indicated it here as “ lost ”. As this lectotype is no longer available, a new lectotype must be designated as its substitute (Art. 9.11). Gardner collected these specimens of Leucothoë ambigua var. longifolia in Arrayas, north of Goiás state in the 19 th century. This region and the city of Arraias currently belongs to the state of Tocantins (Ribeiro 2022) which became emancipated from Goiás by 1989, and this update is indicated in the header of the name, in accordance with the Art. 9.2 of the ICN (Turland et al. 2018). This update is an important novelty regarding the distribution of Agarista, being the first and only record of the genus occurrence in Tocantins State. We designated the specimen K 000494445 as lectotype of Leucothoë ambigua var. longifolia because it is well preserved and also conserves important features indicated in the protologue, such as elongate racemes with wellpreserved capsules, long lanceolate leaves, and small and tomentose pedicels. This sheet has an original label from Gardner with the original collection information. Additionally, this material is available in the digital herbarium database from K (Kew 2022), and through JSTOR Global Plants (JSTOR 2022). Note on Leucothoë rivularis: — Sleumer (1935: 481) described Leucothoë rivularis through the collection Ule 3737, which was considered closely related to L. stenophylla Loesener (1889: 77), but with broader leaves that are almost rounded at the base. Sleumer (1935) indicated the type specimen was deposited at B and that a single specimen was found there. This type was destroyed in 1943. The remaining isotypes consist of three entire sheets (HBG 515430, HBG 515548, L 0006643) and one with fragments from original material (F 0055449 F). No lectotypification of this name was previously proposed. The type location of L. rivularis is the Serra do Itatiaia, now in Itatiaia National Park, created in June 1937, and comprising a massif of mountains bordering the states of Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais (ICMBIO 2022). Sleumer (1935), when publishing this name, indicated the state of Minas Gerais. However, in the label of HBG 515430 the state is corrected from “ Sta. Catharina ” to Rio de Janeiro. In the photo F (220529 [4589]) of the holotype it is possible to visualize in the label that the name was corrected from “ Sta. Catharina ”, but it is not visible to which state the type location was corrected, but is probably Minas Gerais, according to the species description made by Sleumer (1935). This divergent information about the state of origin of the type location, the area occupied by the Itatiaia massif in the states of Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais, and the absence of more accurate information are assumed here. We indicated both states in the header of the name L. rivularis, following Art. 9.2 of the ICN (Turland et al. 2018), assuming this uncertainty about the exact state of origin and taking care to not modify the authors’ original intentions. We designated the specimen HBG 515530 as lectotype of L. rivularis. This collection is well preserved, presents flowers, and is in accordance with the protologue with broader leaves that are almost rounded at the base. We choose this specimen due its original label that agrees with all the information available on the type. Additionally, this specimen is available in the digital herbarium database through JSTOR Global Plants (JSTOR 2022).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A5BFFF81FBF0D1BFD573849.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — BRAZIL. Paraná: [from Carambeí and Castro to Rio Itararé], F. Sellow 4830 (lectotype F 0055217, fragment!, here designated; isolectotype NY 00008247, fragment!.; the former lectotype B †, designated by Sleumer 1959: 472). Epitype, here designated: — BRAZIL. Paraná: Carambeí, rio S ã o Jo ã o, 2 December 2013, M. E. Engels & E. D. Lozano 1902 (MBM 395764!; isoepitype FURB 60673, image!).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A5BFFF81FBF0D1BFD573849.taxon	discussion	Note: — The material used to describe Agarista pulchella is the collection Sellow 4830 originally deposited in the Berlin-Dahlem herbarium (B) and later destroyed by the fire in 1943. The remaining material consists of two sheets with fragments from B (F 0055217 F, NY 00008247). No lectotypification of this name has yet been proposed. Meisner in Martius (1863) indicated the type location in Antonio Pereira, Minas Gerais (in prov. Minarum editis, ad Antonio Pereira: Sellow). On the other hand, as already indicated by Judd (1984, 1995), the locality of the type is very questionable since nearly all collections are from Paraná or Santa Catarina. Urban (1893) indicated that the collections from Sellow under the numbers 4800 to 5246 were collected in the northern part of the Paraná State, from Carambey and Castro to Rio Itararé, which supports the information that the type locality is incorrect. In this way, it is secure to affirm that the type location is mistakenly informed, and the actual location of the type specimen of Agarista pulchella is in the northern part of the Paraná state, possibly near to the current area of the Parque Nacional dos Campos Gerais. In this way, following the Art. 9.2 of the ICN (Turland et al. 2018), we corrected this mistake. We designated the specimen F 0055217 as lectotype because it is a fragment from the holotype (Fig. 1 A) and comprises fragments of leaves, fruits and seeds. As well as the isotype from NY (00008247), none of them have enough material to fully represent the concept of the name A. pulchella. To complement the specimens lack of information and structures, we are also designating the specimen Engels & Lozano 1902 (MBM 395764) as an epitype (Fig. 1 B) following Art. 9.9 of the ICN (Turland et al. 2018). This specimen comprises branches with fruits in accordance with the protologue, is morphologically similar to the type specimen (see photo F 220527 [4587]), and was also collected in Paraná state in the region where probably the original specimen was collected. Additionally, this material is available digitally in speciesLink (SPECIESLINK, 2022).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A54FFF61FBF0AA2FD133E9D.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — BRAZIL. Without location, F. Sellow s. n. (lectotype, E 00326871, image!, here designated; isolectotypes G 00352007, image!, K 000494431, image!, NY 0008205, fragment!, NY 0008206, fragment!; the former lectotype B †, designated by Sleumer 1959: 471).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A54FFF61FBF0AA2FD133E9D.taxon	discussion	Note: — The material used to describe Agarista pulchra is a Sellow collection without number, collected in “ Brasilia tropica ” with no date or location indicated. Friederich Sellow dispatched his collections to the Royal Botanical Garden at Sch ̂ neberg, now part of B (Urban 1893, Moraes 2020, Carvalho et al. 2022) and the specimens used to describe this species were probably deposited in B, but this information cannot be confirmed. Chamisso & Schlechtendal (1826: 521) did not indicate in the protologue a single specimen used for the description of the species or specify the herbarium or other collection in which the type was deposited. Thus, the materials related to this collection could be potential syntypes. There are two syntypes that consist of a few fragments (NY 0008205) and three complete sheets (E 00326871, G 00352007, K 000494431). No lectotypification of this name has yet been proposed. There is another herbarium sheet at NY (NY 0008206) with indication on the label that it is a fragment belonging to Sellow s. n. collection. Here, this material is also considered as an isolectotype of Agarista pulchra. The sheet from K (K 000494431) is a mixed sheet mounted with assembled fragments of two different collections. One sample comprises the collect of Andromeda pulchra from F. Sellow (syntype). The other sample K 000494430 is a collection of Leucothoë pulchra var. parvifolia from Claussen (Minas Geraes, Brasilia) and could be an isolectotype of that name, but there is no collection number indicated in the label to confirm this. Sleumer (1959) called the B † specimen as “ holotype ”, and the remaining duplicate specimens as “ isotypes ”. Judd (1984, 1995) followed this same pattern of type designation. According to 7.11, Ex. 13 of the ICN (Turland el al. 2018), Sleumer (1959), when indicating the type location, collector, collection number and linked these data to the material deposited in B, designated this specimen as a lectotype. The remaining duplicate specimens then became isolectotypes. Moreover, as this lectotype is no longer available, a new lectotype must be designated as its substitute (Art. 9.11). We designated the specimen E 00326871 as lectotype following Art. 9.12 of the ICN (Turland et al. 2018). We choose that specimen due to its original label similar to that of the Sellow collection in B, with Sellow’s handwriting. This collection is well preserved and is the only one among the remaining syntypes that also has flowers in agreement with the protologue. Additionally, this material is available digitally in Jstor Global Plants (JSTOR 2022) and also in the digital herbarium database from E (RBGE, 2022).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A55FFF51FBF0C57FF2039DE.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: São João d’El Rey, Oct. 1819, J. B. E Pohl s. n. (518?) (holotype W 0059384, image!).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A55FFF51FBF0C57FF2039DE.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Serra do Lenheiro, pr. São João d’El Rei, Sellow s. n. (lectotype F 0055223, fragment!, here designated:; isolectotypes F 0055224, fragment!, NY 00008248, fragment!; the former lectotype B †, designated by Sleumer 1959: 464). Epitype, here designated: — BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Serra do Lenheiro, A. F. M. Glaziou 17110 (P 04507711, image!); isoepitype: L 2602655, fragment, image!.	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A55FFF51FBF0C57FF2039DE.taxon	discussion	Note on Andromeda subrotunda: — Pohl was the naturalist in charge for the Brazilian Imperial Royal Herbarium at Vienna. He arrived in Brazil on 7 November 1817. Until 1821 he travelled through Minas Gerais, Goiás, Bahia and Rio de Janeiro. He was appointed as curator at the Vienna Natural History Museum and Vienna Brazilian Museum, which was built upon the collections brought back from that expedition. He published “ Reise im Innern von Brasilien ” (Travels into the Interior of Brazil, two volumes, 1832 and 1837) and the “ Plantarum Brasiliae icones et descriptions ” (two volumes, 1826 – 1828 and 1828 – 1833). The type specimen of Andromeda subrotunda was published in the “ Plantarum Brasiliae icones et descriptions ”. The collection site is indicated as “ habitat in rupibus, circa Villa S. Jo ã o d’El Rey Capitaniae Minas Geraës ”. G. Don (1834) cited this information as “ native of Brazil, in province of Minas Geraes, on rocks about Villa St. Joao d’el Rey ”, and Candolle (1839) describe the location as “ in Brasiliae prov. Minarum generalium in montanis ad rupes circà villam Sancti-Johannis Regii ”. Sleumer (1959) stated in the revision of Leucothoë that the type was not viewed and is “ apparently no longer available ”. Judd (1984) in the review of American Agarista only indicated that the type specimen was not seen. We here confirmed the existence of the holotype in W under the number 0059384. It is the only material corresponding to Andromeda / Leucothoë subrotunda deposited in the herbarium and matches with the illustration provided in “ Plantarum Brasiliae icones et descriptions ii. 32. 1827 ” (t. 121) (Fig. 2). Additionally, the label in that material also comprises the number “ 518 ” in the right Upper corner, that may indicate the collection Pohl number. Note on Andromeda pistrix: — The material used to describe Agarista pistrix is a Sellow collection without number collected in “ Brasilia tropica ” with no date or location indicated. Sellow dispatched his collections to the Royal Botanical Garden at Sch ̂ neberg, now part of B (Urban 1893, Moraes 2020, Carvalho et al. 2022), and the specimens used to describe this new species through his collections were probably deposited in B, but this information cannot be confirmed. Chamisso & Schlechtendal (1833: 508) did not indicate in the protologue a single specimen used for the description or specified the herbarium or other collection in which the type was deposited. Thus, the materials related to this collection could be potential syntypes. The syntype material consists of three sheets (NY 00009751, F 0055223 F, F 0055224 F) with few fragments from the original material. Sleumer (1959) called the B † specimen as “ holotype ” and the remaining duplicate specimens as “ isotypes ”, but according to Art. 7.11, Ex. 13 of the ICN (Turland el al. 2018), Sleumer’s (1959) designation has the status of “ lectotype ”. The remaining duplicate specimens (syntypes) became isolectotypes. Since that lectotype was destroyed, a new lectotype must be designated (Art. 9.11). Sleumer (1959) retrieved the type location (Minas Gerais: Serra do Lenheiro, pr. S ã o Jo ã o d’El Rei), whereas Judd (1984, 1995) kept partially the information about the location type (Minas Gerais: Serra do Lenheiro). We here keep the information indicated by Sleumer (1959) because Serra do Lenheiro is located in S ã o Jo ã o d’El Rei. We designated the specimen F 0055223 as lectotype, following the Art. 9.12 of the ICN (Turland et al. 2018) because it is a fragment from the lectotype designated by Sleumer (1959) (Fig. 3 A), consisting of fragments of leaves and flowers. None of the remaining isolectotypes, has enough material to fully represent the concept of the name A. pistrix. To complement the specimens lack of information and structures, we also designated Glaziou 17110 (P 04507711) as an epitype (Fig. 3 B), following the Art. 9.9 of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN) (Turland et al. 2018). We elected this specimen because it was collected in the same locality of Sellow’s Andromeda pistrix type and presents all the features cited in the protologue. Additionally, this material is available digitally in speciesLink (SPECIESLINK, 2022) and also in the digital herbarium database from P (MNHN, 2022).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A56FFF31FBF0898FCD63D2C.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — BRAZIL. “ In Brasilia ” [Rio de Janeiro: restinga de Cabo Frio], F. Sellow s. n. (lectotype G 00352014, image!, here designated; isolectotypes: B 100191422, image!, BM 000993648, image!, BR 0000005055265, image!, E 00326870, images!, F 0055225!, G 00352013, image!, G 00352015, image!, G 00352016, image!, G 00323839, image!; HAL 0106209, image!, HBG 515545, image!, K 000494425, image!, K 000494427, image!, L 0006651, image!, M 0173299, image!, P 00604188, image!, W 0059345, image!; the former lectotype B †, designated by Sleumer 1959: 452).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A56FFF31FBF0898FCD63D2C.taxon	discussion	Note: — Sprengel (1821: 131) described Agarista revoluta based in the collection Sellow s. n, collected “ In Brasilia ”, with no date or location indicated. Friederich Sellow dispatched his collections to the Royal Botanical Garden at Sch ̂ neberg, now part of B (Urban 1893, Moraes 2020, Carvalho et al. 2022) and the specimens used to describe this new species through his collections were probably deposited in B, but this information cannot be confirmed. The protologue did not cite a single type specimen which based the species description or specified the herbarium of deposit. Potential syntypes include 18 sheets (B 100191422, BM 000993648, BR 0000005055265, E 00326870, F 0055225 F, G 00352013, G 00352014, G 00352015, G 00352016, G 00323839, HAL 0106209, HBG 515545 [fragment], K 000494425, K 000494427, L 0006651, M 0173299, P 00604188, W 0059345). A first lectotypification was made by Judd (1984), indicating the sheet from B (100191422) as lectotype, probably due to this material being in the same herbaria as the holotype destroyed. On the other hand, Moraes (2011) indicated the choice of this material from B as arguable. According to him, it is an herbarium specimen from the Herbarium Baschant that was incorporated in B in April 1959, much later than the publication of the name (Hiepko 1980), bearing label conflicting information that states “ Ericac. / Leucothoë revoluta DC. / (bahiensis DC.) / Bahia / Sellow ”, without any evidence that it could be a duplicate of the collection analyzed by Sprengel. Moraes (2011), furthermore, inferred that the three branches mounted together in the sheet in B seem to belong to different collections, being the fruiting branch on the left side probably from HAL and the other two of unknown provenance (additional information see [Moraes 2011]). We analyzed and confirmed the comments made by Moraes (2011) and chose a new lectotypification instead of a second-step lectotypification because the material deposited in B comprises three branches mounted together in the sheet, probably belonging to different collections, and the provenance of each branch on the sheet could not be inferred with certainty. Therefore, we herein designated the specimen G 00352014 as a new lectotype, following Art. 9.17, ICN (Turland et al. 2018) and Prado & Moran (2022). We chose that specimen because it is well preserved and conserves important features as inflorescences, flowers, and leaves. Although fruits are not available on this sheet, they can be visualized in the isosyntypes. We infer that the sheet in B comprises, at least, two different collections. One corresponding to the specimen of Agarista revoluta collected by Sellow and the other one probably corresponding to a fragment from Blanchet 1680 of Leucothoë bahiensis, a heterotypic synonym of A. revoluta. These inferences are based on the morphological similarity of the fragments in B with the type material and protologue of L. bahiensis and the additional information indicated on the label, such as the location in Bahia. Thus, it is necessary to identify separately the individual fragments in B, indicating the origin of each one.	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A56FFF31FBF0898FCD63D2C.taxon	materials_examined	Additionally, the specimens from K are mounted together with other collections. The specimen K 000494425 is mounted together with Riedel 494 (K 000494424) on the same sheet. The specimen K 000494427 is mounted together with A. St. Hilaire s. n. (K 000494428) and Gomes s. n. (K 000494429). There is another material at MEL from Wied, but there is not enough information to confirm if it is a syntype.	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A50FFF21FBF0CC7FE263DF5.taxon	materials_examined	Type: — BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro: Pico da Tijuca, 1000 m., fl. and fr., November 1897, E. Ule 4576 (lectotype HBG 515547, designated by Judd 1984: 332; isolectotype R 92776!; the former holotype B †, designated by Sleumer 1935: 481).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
FE0EFE3F3A50FFF21FBF0CC7FE263DF5.taxon	discussion	Note: — The type of Leucothoë ambigua var. parvifolia, Riedel s. n., was originally deposited in the Herbarium Sonder (“ Riedel in herb. Sonder ”). This variety was characterized mainly by the oblong lanceolate leaves with sharp recurved edges, thin petiole and minutely canose-tomentose peduncles. The holotype of L. ambigua var. parvifolia was not seen by Judd (1984, 1995) and there is no indication if it is extant. The one syntype, NY 00010134, consists of fragments. No lectotypification has been proposed until now. We designated the specimen NY 00010134 as lectotype (Art. 9.12, ICN (Turland et al. 2018) because it is the only known remaining material from the type (Fig. 4). This specimen comprises only fragments of leaves and does not comprise enough material to fully represent the concept of the name Leucothoë ambigua var. parvifolia (Figure 4 A). Therefore, we are designating Glaziou 6620 (P 04507702; Fig. 4 B) as epitype following the Art. 9.9 of the ICN (Turland et al. 2018). We chose that specimen because it was already mentioned by Sleumer (1959) when he synonymized L. ambigua var. parvifolia under Agarista uleana. This specimen presents all the features used for the description of the species indicated in the protologue, and additionally contains flowers. This material is available digitally in the digital herbarium database from P (MNHN, 2022). Moreover, isoepitypes are available digitally on speciesLink (SPECIESLINK, 2022) and also on the digital herbarium databases from F (Field Museum Botanical Collections 2022) and NY (NYBG 2022).	en	Dalastra, Claudenice Hilda, Heiden, Gustavo (2023): Typifications and nomenclatural notes on Agarista (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae, Lyonieae). Phytotaxa 618 (1): 1-17, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0755-PDN
