identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
9B4894F032D75689BE30892A8F30A88B.text	9B4894F032D75689BE30892A8F30A88B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Kodormus Barber 1930	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Kodormus Barber, 1930</p>
            <p> Kodormus Barber, 1930: 151 [key], 213-214 [description]; Costa Lima 1940: 166, footnote [  Kodormus considered identical to  Otiodactylus Pinto, 1927]; Costa Lima 1941: 337-338 [  Kodormus recognized as diverse from  Otiodactylus but alleged as possessing the same characteristics of  Ocrioessa Bergroth, 1918]; Costa Lima and Campos Seabra 1944: 507 [  Kodormus recognized as distinct from  Ocrioessa ], 510 [key]; Costa Lima and Campos Seabra 1945: 159 [checklist]; Wygodzinsky 1949: 66 [catalog]; Putshkov and Putshkov 1985: 104 [catalog]; Giacchi 1985: 68-69 [redescription]; Maldonado 1990: 506 [catalog]; Wygodzinsky and Giacchi 1994: 7 [key], 8 [checklist];  Bérenger and Maldonado 1996: 37 [comparison with other genera]; Froeschner 1999: 227 [catalog]; Forero 2004: 166 [diagnosis], 167 [new record from Colombia], 191 [key]; Gil-Santana et al. 2015: 337 [citation], 341 [key]; Gil-Santana and Oliveira 2016: 501, 502 [citations], 505 [key]. </p>
            <p>Type species.</p>
            <p> Kodormus bruneosus Barber, 1930: 214-216, by original designation. </p>
            <p>Diagnosis.</p>
            <p> This genus can be separated from other genera of the New World by the following set of characters. Body somewhat elongated, ~ 2-3  × as long as maximum width, slightly flattened dorsoventrally. Head large, anteocular portion longer than postocular; antennal scape shorter than anteocular portion; eyes prominent, shortly setose; labial segment II [first visible] shorter than the others combined; postocular region broad; ramose setigerous processes posterolaterally behind eyes; anterior lobe of pronotum with anterior angles prominent, anterior and lateral margins covered with a row of setigerous tubercules, and a pair of tubercles on its disc; pronotum wider across humeri than along midline; humeral angles protruding; prosternum behind coxae shorter than length of coxae; evaporatory area of metapleuron large, sooty black; fore femora strongly incrassate, robust, at least twice as thick as middle and hind femora; fore and hind tibiae curved, small tibial pads on apices of fore and middle tibia. Abdomen broad, with a more or less expanded connexival margins, which are denticulate and/or lobulated at posterolateral angles of segments II-VI; in male, posterior margin of the abdominal segment VII almost or completely covering the pygophore in dorsal view and with a slightly bilobate shape; in the (known) females, the genital area is visible from above and conical. </p>
            <p>Redescription.</p>
            <p> Body somewhat elongated, ~ 2-3  × as long as maximum width, slightly flattened dorsoventrally. General color pale to dark brownish with darkened and pale portions; a clear, generally whitish rounded or subrounded spot above the approximately mid-portion of the outer cell of the membrane of hemelytra. Integument dull, body and legs, except tarsi, generally covered with short, rounded tubercles, each with a short pale apical scale-like seta (setigerous tubercles), scale-like setae, and on some areas, simple setae too. Some glabrous areas, such as the interocular sulcus or forming lines on head, thoracic sterna and femora, subrounded to irregular areas on anterior lobe of pronotum, pleura and abdomen. The integument is generally rugous where there are setigerous tubercles and smooth in the glabrous portions. Simple erect or curved setae are present on labium, antennal segments II-IV, fore tibiae and tarsi. Head subcylindrical; a little longer than wide; shorter than pronotum; anteocular region ~ 2  × longer than postocular region, the latter wider than the former. Mandibular plates (jugae sensu Barber 1930; Costa Lima 1941; tylus sensu Giacchi 1985) prominent, divergent, tapering. A small lateral protuberance on antenniferous with setigerous seta(e). Antenna inserted far from eye, somewhat anterior to middle point of anteocular portion, laterally; scape thickened at distal 2/3, somewhat curved at middle 1/3, shorter than anteocular region and covered with pale scale-like setae; pedicel, longer than other segments,&gt; 2  × longer and slenderer than the scape, straight at basal 1/2, somewhat curved at middle portion or distal 1/2 and slightly thickened apically; in male, with very numerous, pale to whitish, thin, long, erect to somewhat curved setae, forming a dense pubescence covering almost all the segment, except on anterodorsal surface, where these setae are scarcer and there are 2-4 irregular rows of sparse stout darkened and stiff long setae, in which one or two rows are composed by setae serrate at their distal portion, while the setae of the other rows are uniform; at distal portion of the pedicel the stout setae are less numerous and serrate setae are absent; apex covered by shorter curved pale setae. In the female, the pedicel has sparse scale-like setae and, at the distal portion, scattered straight or somewhat curved short pale setae. Flagellomeres much thinner, cylindrical, straight, subequal in length, each a little shorter than the scape, with few scattered long, erect, stouter setae and a pubescence of simple setae which is formed by thin, short to moderately longer setae on basiflagellomere and generally shorter and even thinner setae on distiflagellomere; the apex of the latter acutely pointed. Clypeus depressed, with a pair of more developed setigerous tubercles. Eyes globose, rounded in dorsal view; suboval in lateral view, extending somewhat on the lower surface of the head, with sparse scale-like setae among facets. Transverse sulcus not very deep, somewhat curved; more sinuous at lateral portions, reaching eyes at their inner posterior angle. Ocelli moderately large, prominently elevated, each ocellus separate from the other for a distance wider than the width of each of them. Labial segment II [first visible] thicker and shorter than the others combined, reaching approximately level of anterior portion of eye; its length subequal to that of the segment III; the latter thinner toward apex; segment IV slender, ~ 1/2 as long as segment III, tapering; its apex reaching stridulatory sulcus on approximately its middle 1/3. Postocular region of the head converging behind eyes to neck, rounded on dorsal view, with one or two conspicuous ramose setigerous processes posterolaterally at each side; above the latter, between eyes and posterior margin, a serial line of somewhat more developed setigerous tubercles. On ventral surface of head, 4-16 large conspicuous setigerous tubercles, generally grouped by transverse pairs, but sometimes, besides some pairs, an isolated tubercle is present at only one side. Two or more of these tubercles generally lie anteriorly to the eyes, and the more posterior pair lies between eyes, near their posterior margin. While in the most posterior pair, the tubercles are very close to each other or even contiguous; in the other pairs, they are clearly separated from each other. Thorax: pronotum wider than long, with anterolateral angles prominent; a pair of tubercles on disc of fore lobe; pronotum wider across humeri than along midline; humeral angles pointed or more prominent. Anterior collar with a variable number of somewhat more developed setigerous tubercles, which also form single rows on the lateral margins of fore lobe of pronotum and on the antero-lateral margin of propleura. Transverse furrow between fore and hind lobes of pronotum shallow, interrupted laterally by a pair of faint submedian ridges; the latter run on approximately the proximal 1/3 of the hind lobe. Fore lobe with a median very thin and somewhat deep midlongitudinal sulcus on the approximately distal 1/2 of fore lobe; sinuate linear ridges covered with setigerous tubercles, narrow and glabrous areas among them and between the most external ridges; lateral margin covered by a row of setigerous tubercles. Supracoxal lobes not prominent; anterior portion of fore supracoxal lobe with a group of conspicuous tubercles, similar to the ramose setigerous of the head. Scutellum subtriangular, longer than wide, with an erect apical tubercle; metascutum also with a short tubercle. Propleura moderately declivous, reaching ventral side laterally and posteriorly to fore coxae. Meso- and metapleura almost vertical; evaporatory area of metapleura large, sooty black. Anterior prosternal processes moderately elongated and curved downwards at apex. Prosternum behind coxae shorter than length of coxae. Stridulitrum long. Mesosternum flat; metasternum slightly prominent at median portion. Legs: fore coxae close, separated from each other by the prosternum, which surpasses fore coxae, by a short distance; middle coxae inserted somewhat less close to each other than the fore coxae; hind coxae inserted very distant from each other. Coxae with two or three ill-defined glabrous longitudinal lines; large setigerous tubercles on fore coxae, more numerous or only present anteriorly. Trochanters with glabrous areas; fore trochanters with two pairs of spiny tubercles on internal surface. Fore femora fusiform, strongly incrassate, at ≥ 2  × thicker than middle and hind femora; ventrally with spiny, relatively small, rounded tubercles, including a basal group of 3-5 elements, a midline row with 5-8 elements and some others close to this row on anterior surface; at apex, a lateroventral pair of conspicuous setigerous processes. Fore and middle femora approximately as long as respective tibiae. Scale-like setae on femora and middle and hind tibiae very numerous and generally longer. Fore tibiae with smaller, less numerous or without tubercles and generally less setose than other tibiae. Tarsi with scattered scale-like setae dorsally and stout, straight or slightly curved setae, more numerous, sometimes forming tufts, ventrally. All femora with glabrous lines, which are larger and more evident on fore femora and straight, thinner, and less evident or partly interrupted on middle and hind femora. On fore femora, a ventral and two dorsal of these glabrous, somewhat shiny, lines are generally present. Mid and hind femora slender, straight, somewhat thickened subdistally, generally with some more developed subapical setigerous processes, ventrally. Fore and hind tibiae curved, middle tibiae slightly curved or sometimes straight; all of them compressed dorsoventrally, except at base, generally with a median shallow narrow longitudinal furrow on each lateral surface, except at base, with small tibial pads on fore and middle legs. Fore tarsi two- or three-segmented; middle and hind tarsi three-segmented. Ratio of tarsal segments (approximately): fore tarsi: 1:3 (when two-segmented) / 1:1.5:2.8 (when three-segmented); middle tarsi: 1:1.4-1.6:1.9-2.0; hind tarsi: 1:1.2-1.5:1.8-2.2. Hemelytra with discal cell closed, although the distal cross vein may be indistinct and the cell seems open; corium generally with sparse small scale-like setae, which are more numerous on lateral portion; membrane glabrous. Abdomen: suboval in shape, flattened; segments gradually widening to apex of segment V, then strongly shortening in the next two segments, towards apex; first tergite narrow, integument with shallow longitudinal ridges; tergites II-VI glabrous at median portion in variable extent; scars of dorsal abdominal gland openings on median anterior margins of tergites IV and V very small; connexival margins prominently denticulate and/or lobulated at posterolateral angles of segments II-VI; progressively larger from segment II to V, the latter, although variably in shape among the species, is always the largest, while that on segment VI has a dimension similar or slightly larger in comparison to the prominences on segments II and III. Sternite II (first visible) &lt;1/3 as long as the sternite III. Sternites II-VI with a median longitudinal narrow pronounced keel; spiracles on sternites II-VII elliptical, prominent, diagonally oriented in relation to the abdominal margin, approximately at medial point between the intersegmental furrows; their margins darkened, even in individuals in which the surrounding integument is pale. In male, posterior border of segment VII straight or curved at median portion, latero-distal margins curved or acute; eighth sternite slightly sinuous on median portion of posterior margin. In the (known) females, the genital area is visible from above and conical. Male genitalia: Genital capsule only visible in ventral view and when in situ, with parameres visible in posterior view; exposed portion of pygophore sub-rounded, covered with setigerous tubercles with scale-like setae; in dorsal view, between anterior and genital openings, a moderately narrow bridge; laterodorsal margin of pygophore, between the bridge and the insertion of parameres, with numerous variably long erect simple setae. Proctiger subsquared with several long setae on approximately its distal 1/3. Medial process of pygophore only visible via dorsal view, with adjacent sparse erect setae, directed upwards, situated just below the paramere apices, subtriangular, triangular or spiniform in anterior view; straight, elongated, thin, and with apex acute in lateral view. Paramere apices close in resting position; in ventral view only the posterior margins of their apices are visible. Parameres symmetrical, very curved in median portion, with a sclerotized moderately large subapical blunt prominence on internal surface; glabrous on approximately basal 1/3 and generally covered with scale-like setae on the exposed surface and scattered, straight, moderately short to longer, simple, erect, thin setae, which are somewhat more numerous around the subapical prominence. Phallus: articulatory apparatus short, with a short basal plate bridge and somewhat longer basal plate arms; pedicel longer than articulatory apparatus, slightly enlarged towards apex, with deep transverse ridges, curved in lateral view and subrectangular in dorsal and ventral views. Gonopore process slightly sclerotized, broad. Dorsal phallothecal sclerite subrectangular, moderately sclerotized. Struts as a pair of elongated arms, fused distally; subcylindrical in approximately basal 2/3 and somewhat enlarged towards apices, which are rounded. Endosoma formed only by its wall, which is smooth and very wrinkled, distal margin more coarsely rugous and sclerotized, shortly prolonged ventrally by an almost imperceptible fold which leans against the main portion of the endosoma. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9B4894F032D75689BE30892A8F30A88B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gil-Santana, Helcio R.;Berenger, Jean-Michel;Oliveira, Jader	Gil-Santana, Helcio R., Berenger, Jean-Michel, Oliveira, Jader (2023): A new species of Kodormus Barber, with a redescription of the genus, taxonomic notes, and a key to the species of the genus (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Reduviidae, Stenopodainae). ZooKeys 1181: 265-298, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1181.108463, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1181.108463
53AC19B395155BF0AAB536044986A156.text	53AC19B395155BF0AAB536044986A156.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Kodormus barberi (Costa Lima 1941)	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Kodormus barberi (Costa Lima, 1941)</p>
            <p>Figs 1-4, 5-10, 11-16, 17-26, 27-33, 34-41, 42-50</p>
            <p> Ocrioessa barberi Costa Lima, 1941: 339-341, figs 2, 5-6; Rodrigues et al. 2017: 188 [catalog of type specimens; present combination cited], fig. 75 [holotype, dorsal view], table 1 [citation; present combination cited]. </p>
            <p> Kodormus barberi ; Costa Lima and Campos Seabra 1944: 507 [new combination]; Costa Lima and Campos Seabra 1945: 159 [checklist; new combination reinforced]; Wygodzinsky 1949: 66 [catalog]; Maldonado 1990: 506 [catalog];  Bérenger and Maldonado 1996: 35 [citation], figs 9, 37 [distinguishing features]; Gil-Santana and Alencar 2001: 173 [checklist; as a misidentification of  K. davidmartinsi sp. nov.; see below]; Forero 2004: 166 [citation]. </p>
            <p>Notes.</p>
            <p> Costa Lima (1941) described  Ocrioessa barberi based on a male holotype (Figs 1, 2) and a male paratype, both from southeast Brazil (States of Rio de Janeiro and  São Paulo, respectively). It is noteworthy that Costa Lima (1941) argued that  Kodormus bruneosus should belong to  Ocrioessa , while  O. barberi would be extremely close to this species. He additionally stated that  O. barberi could not be subsumed to the other two species of  Ocrioessa because both presented pads in fore tibiae (Barber 1930) while the latter were absent in fore tibiae of  Kodormus , accordingly with its description (Barber 1930). Despite these statements, Costa Lima (1941) did not propose any formal synonym between  Ocrioessa and  Kodormus . Costa Lima and Campos Seabra (1944), however, concluded that  Kodormus was really distinct from  Ocrioessa , establishing the new combination,  Kodormus barberi , which was reinforced by Costa Lima and Campos Seabra (1945). </p>
            <p>Type material examined.</p>
            <p> Ocrioessa barberi Costa Lima, 1941. Brazil: Male holotype: [printed label] ANGRA - JUSSARAL / TRAV. [= Travassos] &amp; ALMEIDA [leg.] / 8 [handwritten] 4 -[1]935 // [framed typewritten label] 4522 // [framed printed label] HOLOTYPO (CEIOC). </p>
            <p>Additional specimens.</p>
            <p> Kodormus barberi (Costa Lima, 1941). Brazil: Rio de Janeiro:  Kodormus /  Kodormus barberi / (Costa Lima) [handwritten] / Wygodzinsky det. [printed] '64 [handwritten] // J. F.  Zikán [printed vertically at left side] / Itatiaya [printed] 700 m [handwritten] / [printed] E. [State of] Rio [de Janeiro] - Brasil [Brazil] / [handwritten] 15.-X.-1935 Z. [?] // [framed printed label] CTIOC / N°. 855, 1 male;  Kodormus /  Kodormus barberi / (Costa Lima) [handwritten] / Wygodzinsky det. [printed] '64 [handwritten] // J. F.  Zikán [printed vertically at left side] / Itatiaya [printed] 700 m [handwritten] / [printed] E. [State of] Rio [de Janeiro] - Brasil [Brazil] / [handwritten] 13.-IX.-1941 Z. [?] // [printed label]  Coleção [Collection] J. F. Zikan // [framed printed label] CTIOC / N°. 856, 1 male;  São Paulo: [printed label]  SALESÓPOLIS (  BORACÉA ) / S. PAULO - 24-IX-[1]946 / TRAVASSOS &amp; VENTEL [leg.] // [framed printed label] CTIOC / N°. 851, 1 male;  Kodormus /  Kodormus barberi / (Costa Lima) [handwritten] / Wygodzinsky det. [printed] '64 [handwritten] // [printed label]  SALESÓPOLIS (  BORACÉA ) / S. PAULO - 24-9-[1]946 / TRAVASSOS &amp;VANSOLINI [sic], [leg.] // [printed label] Instituto Osvaldo Cruz // [handwritten label] desenhado [drawn] // [framed printed label] CTIOC / N°. 852, 1 male; [printed label]  SALESÓPOLIS (  BORACÉA ) / S. PAULO - 24-9-[1]946 / TRAVASSOS &amp;VANSOLINI [sic], [leg.] // [framed printed label] CTIOC / N°. 853, 1 male;  Kodormus /  Kodormus barberi / (Costa Lima) [handwritten] / Wygodzinsky det. [printed] '64 [handwritten] // [printed label]  SALESÓPOLIS (  BORACÉA ) / S. PAULO - 24-9-[1]946 / TRAVASSOS &amp;VANSOLINI [sic], [leg.] // [framed printed label] CTIOC / N°. 854, 1 male (CTIOC). </p>
            <p>Diagnosis.</p>
            <p> Kodormus barberi can be separated from other species of the genus by the more developed and larger integumental setigerous tubercles, longer and more conspicuous processes on the disc of fore lobe of pronotum, humeral angles, scutellum and acute latero-distal margins of abdominal segment VII. </p>
            <p>Description.</p>
            <p> Male. Figs 1, 3 - 50. Total length: 17.0-19.0 mm; maximum width of abdomen (between apices of connexival prominences of segment V): 5.5-6.8 mm. Coloration (Figs 1, 3 - 5, 11, 17, 20, 21, 24, 26, 34, 36, 41): generally brownish; scattered ill-defined and variable darkened and pale markings or portions along the body and legs; pedicel variably paler with apex darkened; apices of femora pale, more extensively on fore femora; apices of prominences of humeri, scutellum and metascutum paler; connexivum paler with prominences darkened; pale portions on fore femora and connexivum sometimes with a greenish to a yellowish tinge. Structure and vestiture: Dorsal surface of head with several large setigerous tubercles (Figs 5, 6, 11-14). Postocular region of the head with only one posterolateral ramose setigerous process at each side (Figs 5, 6, 9, 10, 14). Tubercles on disc of fore lobe, elevated, thick and spiniform (Fig. 11). Humeral angle with an elongated and thick process (Figs 17, 20-22). Process of scutellum moderately elongated (23-25). Coxae, femora and tibiae (except fore tibiae) generally covered by numerous large setigerous tubercles (Figs 26 - 29, 34, 36). Middle tibiae slightly curved; straight in some individuals (Figs 1, 3, 34). Fore tarsi bi-segmented; the second segment ~ 3  × as long as the first segment (Figs 32, 33). Hemelytra with distal cross vein variably distinct or not distinct; membrane of hemelytra varying from not reaching to slightly surpassing apex of abdomen (Figs 1, 3, 4). Connexival margins prominently lobulated at posterolateral angles of segments II-VI; short, but progressively larger from segment II to V, the latter, although variably in shape among the specimens, is always the largest, while that on segment VI has a dimension similar or slightly larger in comparison to the prominences on segments II-III (Figs 1, 3, 4, 39). Lateroapical margins of last abdominal segment prominent, acute or faintly curved (Figs 1, 3, 4, 40, 41). Male genitalia (Figs 41 - 50): medial process of pygophore small, straight, spiniform in anterior view (Fig. 43). </p>
            <p>Comments.</p>
            <p> In the original description of  K. barberi , Costa Lima (1941) recorded the pads on fore tibiae as being absent. However, the examination of the holotype as well as additional non-type specimens allowed confirmation that a small pad is present on the fore and middle tibiae in this species (Fig. 31), while the fore tarsi are revealed to be bi-segmented (Figs 32, 33). </p>
            <p>Distribution.</p>
            <p> Brazil (States of Rio Grande do Sul, Rio de Janeiro and  São Paulo) (Costa Lima 1941; this work; Insetos do Brasil Project). </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/53AC19B395155BF0AAB536044986A156	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gil-Santana, Helcio R.;Berenger, Jean-Michel;Oliveira, Jader	Gil-Santana, Helcio R., Berenger, Jean-Michel, Oliveira, Jader (2023): A new species of Kodormus Barber, with a redescription of the genus, taxonomic notes, and a key to the species of the genus (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Reduviidae, Stenopodainae). ZooKeys 1181: 265-298, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1181.108463, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1181.108463
9B1DD0BC63FB5AC5AA45135A72E6A414.text	9B1DD0BC63FB5AC5AA45135A72E6A414.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Kodormus bruneosus Barber 1930	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Kodormus bruneosus Barber, 1930</p>
            <p>Figs 51-54, 55-62, 63-68, 69-74, 75-85, 86-90</p>
            <p> Kodormus bruneosus Barber, 1930: 214-216 [description]; Costa Lima 1940: 166, footnote [  Kodormus bruneosus considered as being possibly identical to  Otiodactylus signatus Pinto, 1927]; Costa Lima 1941: 337-338 [  K. bruneosus very different from  Otiodactylus signatus ; should be included in  Ocrioessa ]; Wygodzinsky 1949: 66 [catalog]; Villiers 1971: 684 [misspelled as " brunneosus "; recorded from French Guiana]; Giacchi 1985: 69 [redescription of the male]; Maldonado 1990: 506 [catalog];  Bérenger and Maldonado 1996: 35 [citation], fig. 8, 37 [distinguishing features]; Froeschner 1999: 227 [catalog]; Forero 2004: 166-167, fig. 5.108 [citation, new record from Colombia]; Forero 2006: 36, fig. 58 [new record from Colombia]; Gil-Santana and Husemann 2023: 407, fig. 26 [new records from Ecuador and Peru]. </p>
            <p>Notes.</p>
            <p> Kodormus bruneosus was described based on three specimens: a male  “Type” (Figs 51, 52), and as  “Paratype” , a female and an additional male (Barber 1930). The use of the term  “Paratype” in the singular must have been a typo. He probably meant to state both specimens as paratypes as he did in several other species described in the same paper. On the other hand, the male designated by him as the  “Type” is regarded here as a holotype, following the Art. 73.1.1 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999), which defines that if an author states in the original publication that one specimen and only one is "the type" or uses some equivalent expression, that specimen is the holotype fixed by original designation. </p>
            <p>Type material examined.</p>
            <p> Kodormus bruneosus Barber, 1930. Male holotype: Panama: [printed label] USNM_ENT, QR CODE / UCR_ENT 00007958 // [framed label] [handwritten]  Kodormus /  Kodormus bruneosus / ♂ Barber / [printed] Det H G Barber // [almost completely printed label] CabimaPan [Cabima, Panama] / May 26 [handwritten].11 / AugustBusck // [red label] [almost completely printed label] TypeNo. / 43376 [handwritten] / U.S.N.M. (NMNH). </p>
            <p>Additional specimens.</p>
            <p> Brazil:  Maranhão : Balsas, 08°48'41"S, 46°21'49"W, x.1996, leg. M. Eklein, 1 male; Feira Nova do  Maranhão , Retiro, 07°00'31"S, 46°26'41"W, 29-30.xi.1995, leg. M. Eklein, 1 male; Mato Grosso, Diamantino, Alto Rio Arinos, 14°25'S, 56°29'W, 30.iv.2002, E. Furtado, leg., 1 male;  Pará :  Kodormus /  Kodormus bruneosus / Barber [handwritten] / Wygodzinsky det. [printed] '64 [handwritten] // [printed label] Cachimbo E. [state of]  Pará / Travassos-Oliveira / &amp;  Adão [leg.], 25/9-10-[1]956 // [framed printed label] CTIOC / N°. 847, 1 male;  Kodormus /  Kodormus bruneosus / Barber [handwritten] / Wygodzinsky det. [printed] '64 [handwritten] // [printed label] Cachimbo E. [state of]  Pará / Travassos-Oliveira / &amp;  Adão [leg.], 25/9-10-[1]956 // [framed printed label] CTIOC / N°. 848, 1 male;  Kodormus /  Kodormus bruneosus / Baber [handwritten] / Wygodzinsky det. [printed] '64 [handwritten] // [printed label] Cachimbo E. [state of]  Pará / Travassos-Oliveira / &amp;  Adão [leg.], 25/9-10-[1]956 // [printed label] Instituto Osvaldo Cruz // [handwritten label] desenhado [drawn] // [framed printed label] CTIOC / N°. 849, 1 male;  Kodormus /  Kodormus bruneosus / Barber [handwritten] / Wygodzinsky det. [printed] '64 [handwritten] // [handwritten label]  Belém ,  Pará / M. Alvarenga / 1-1956 // [printed label] Instituto Osvaldo Cruz //[framed printed label] CTIOC / N°. 850, 1 male (CTIOC). Ecuador: Narupa, Napo Province, 1.200 m, 12.ii.1996,  Juán Salvador leg., 1 male (MNRJ). French Guiana:  Itoupé , DZ 570 m, 9.iii.2010, light trap, SEAG leg. 2 males and one female; N2, pk 79, 7.i.1996, PL, B. Hermier leg., 1 male; Degrad  Corrèze , Route de  régina , pk 62, 19.xii.1998, Kindl leg., 1 male; Degrad Kwata, iii.1995, PL, vesco JP leg., 1 male; Barrage petit Saut, 2.iii.1993, J-MB  réc , 1 male; Grand Santi, PL, 29.iv.2000, P. Causse leg., 1 male; Laussat, PL, 11.ix.2010, light trap, SEAG leg., 1 female; D6, pk 37, 01.i.1998, light trap, B. Hermier leg., 1 female; Montagne des chevaux, PL, 22.xii.2008, light trap, SEAG leg., 1 female (J-MB). Peru: [red label with a smaller white label glued on it; both printed labels] Coll. R. I. Sc. N. B. [underlined by a black line] /  Pérou [on the smaller white label] Peru 700 m / Chanchamayo / 20.X.1960 // [printed label]  Kodormus / brunneus [sic] / Barber / JMaldonadoC.85 [1985] //  Kodormus [printed] /  Kodormus bruneosus [handwritten] / Gil-Santana det. [printed] 19 [handwritten; 2019], 1 male (RBINS). </p>
            <p>Diagnosis.</p>
            <p> Kodormus bruneosus may be separated from most of the other species of the genus by the denticulate latero-distal angles of connexival segments II-VI and from  K. oscurus , which although has a somewhat similar connexival structure, presents more prominent connexival latero-distal angles, and by their general coloration, which is generally brownish in  K. bruneosus and darker in  K. oscurus . </p>
            <p>Description.</p>
            <p>Male (Figs 51 - 85). Total length 17.5-21.5 mm; maximum width of abdomen (between apices of connexival prominences of segment V): 5.5-8.8 mm. Coloration (Figs 51, 53 - 55, 73, 74): generally brownish; in some individuals with some portions more darkened such as the fore lobe of pronotum, legs, prominences of connexivum, and ventral surface of abdomen. Antennal pedicel variably paler with apex darkened. Pale markings or portions variably scattered on head, apices of femora, basal portions of tibiae and sternites; the latter sometimes almost or completely paler. Structure and vestiture (Figs 51, 53 - 74): Postocular region of the head with two ramose setigerous processes posterolaterally on each side, very close to each other, the most posterior one slightly above of the other. Setigerous tubercles on serial line of postocular region of head, anterior collar and single rows on the lateral margins of fore lobe of pronotum variable in size and coloration among individuals, larger and pale to whitish or smaller and darker. Tubercles on disc of fore lobe flat, rounded. Humeral angle short, spiniform (Figs 51, 53 - 55). Process of scutellum short. Membrane of hemelytra varying from not reaching to slightly surpassing apex of abdomen (Figs 51, 53 - 55). Fore tarsus three-segmented (Fig. 68). Lateroapical margins of connexivum more or less prominent among individuals; that on segment V is sometimes apically curved downward (Figs 51, 53 - 55, 73, 74). Male genitalia (Figs 74 - 85): medial process of pygophore enlarged; triangular in anterior view (Fig. 77).</p>
            <p>Female (Figs 86-90): Total length: 22-23 mm; maximum width of abdomen between apices of connexival prominences of segment V: 9-11 mm. Similar to male in general (Figs 86, 87). Antennal pedicel with scattered very short and sparse scale-like setae, and a few thin, long setae distally (Fig. 88, A). Abdomen very wide, with a maximum width on segment V (Figs 86, 87). Membrane of hemelytra not reaching apex of abdomen (Fig. 86); genital area visible from above, cone shaped and acute (Fig. 86). Female genitalia: external genitalia as in Figs 89, 90.</p>
            <p>Comments.</p>
            <p> Barber (1930) recorded the tibial pad as absent at the apex of fore tibia in  K. bruneosus . Giacchi (1985), when redescribed the male of this species, did not mention the presence or absence of pads on the tibiae. However, we have recorded the presence of tibial pads at apices of fore and middle tibiae in all specimens of  K. bruneosus studied here (Figs 66 - 70). Our observation is in accordance with Weirauch (2007) who also recorded tibial pads (as fossula spongiosa) as present both in fore and middle tibiae of  K. bruneosus . </p>
            <p> The description of  K. bruneosus by Barber (1930) seems to have been based only on the male type (s), because no detail was given concerning the female cited as  “Paratype” . There was no mention about differences between sexes and neither about the genital portions. While Barber (1930) recorded the pedicel as densely setose, as seen in males (Figs 57-60), he did not mention that, accordingly with the females examined here, it is remarkably less setose in the females (Fig. 88, A). Additionally, the females were generally larger, with wider abdomens (Figs 86, 87). </p>
            <p> When recording  K. bruneosus from Colombia, Forero (2006) listed Brazil as a country of occurrence of the species too. However, this supposed record was based on Wygodzinsky and Giacchi (1994), who actually recorded only  Kodormus from Brazil, not specifying any species of the genus. Their record may possibly have been based on  K. barberi , the only species recorded from Brazil so far. This assertion was confirmed to the first author (HRG-S) by D. Forero (pers. inform.). Therefore, the first proven record of  K. bruneosus from this country is provided here. </p>
            <p>Distribution.</p>
            <p>Panama, Guyana (Barber 1930), French Guiana (Villiers 1971), Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela (Giacchi 1985), Bolivia (Maldonado 1990), Colombia (Forero 2004, 2006), Ecuador and Peru (Gil-Santana and Husemann 2023).</p>
            <p>New record.</p>
            <p> Brazil (States of  Maranhão , Mato Grosso and  Pará ). </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9B1DD0BC63FB5AC5AA45135A72E6A414	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gil-Santana, Helcio R.;Berenger, Jean-Michel;Oliveira, Jader	Gil-Santana, Helcio R., Berenger, Jean-Michel, Oliveira, Jader (2023): A new species of Kodormus Barber, with a redescription of the genus, taxonomic notes, and a key to the species of the genus (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Reduviidae, Stenopodainae). ZooKeys 1181: 265-298, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1181.108463, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1181.108463
9DEEB7E418ED57D897334331BADC5D62.text	9DEEB7E418ED57D897334331BADC5D62.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Kodormus davidmartinsi Gil-Santana & Bérenger & Oliveira 2023	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Kodormus davidmartinsi sp. nov.</p>
            <p>Figs 91-95, 96-104</p>
            <p> Kodormus barberi ; Gil-Santana and Alencar 2001: 173 [checklist; misidentification]. </p>
            <p>Notes.</p>
            <p> Gil-Santana and Alencar (2001) based on a male specimen from a Natural Reserve in Linhares,  Espírito Santo State, Brazil, included  Kodormus barberi in a checklist of  Reduviidae of this locality. However, a re-examination of the specimen from Linhares made it clear that it belongs to the new species,  K. davidmartinsi sp. nov., with the designation of this specimen as the holotype. An additional specimen from the same locality was included as a paratype. </p>
            <p>Type material examined.</p>
            <p> Brazil,  Espírito Santo: Linhares, Reserva Natural Vale, 19°09'S, 40°04'W,  José Simplício dos Santos leg., male holotype, xi.1990 (MNRJ); same locality and collector, 1 male paratype, 11.xii.1987, CTIOC n° 13832 (CTIOC). </p>
            <p>Diagnosis.</p>
            <p> Kodormus davidmartinsi sp. nov. and  K. barberi may be separated from other species of the genus by the presence of connexival margins of segments III-V lobulated. These species may be separated from each other by the larger lobulated portion of connexival segment V in  K. davidmartinsi sp. nov. Additionally,  K. davidmartinsi sp. nov. has smaller integumental setigerous spiniferous processes, shorter processes of disc of fore lobe of pronotum, humeral angles, scutellum and rounded latero-distal margins of abdominal segment VII. In male genitalia, the medial process of pygophore in anterior view, is subtriangular in  K. davidmartinsi sp. nov. and spiniform in  K. barberi . </p>
            <p>Description.</p>
            <p> Male. Figs 91 - 104. Measurements (mm) (holotype / paratype): Total length: 20.5 / 21.5; head: total length (excluding neck, lateral view): 3.2 / 3.1; maximum width across eyes: 2.4 / 2.7; length of anteocular portion: 1.6 / 1.6; length of postocular portion: 0.8 / 0.7; interocular space (synthlipsis): 1.0 / 1.1; transverse width of right eye: 0.7 / 0.8; length of right eye: 0.8 / 0.9; lengths of antennal segments: scape: 1.3 / 1.4; pedicel: 3.0 / 3.0; basiflagellomere 0.8 / 0.6; distiflagellomere: 0.8 [approx.; very curved] / absent; lengths of labial segments: II [first visible]: 1.6 / 1.7; III: 1.4 / 1.6; IV: 0.9 / 0.9. Thorax: pronotum: length of fore lobe (at midline): 1.9 / 1.9; length of hind lobe (at midline): 1.8 / 1.8; width at posterior margin: 4.7 / 5.0. Fore legs: length of femur: 5.4 / 5.6; maximum width of femur at mid portion: 1.3 / 1.4; length of tibia: 5.2 / 5.4; length of pad: 0.1 / 0.2; length of tarsus: 0.7 / 0.8; middle legs: length of femur: 6.5 / 7.2; maximum width of femur at mid portion: 0.45 / 0.45; length of tibia: 6.4 / 7.5; length of pad: 0.2 / 0.2; length of tarsus: 1.5 / 1.5; hind legs: length of femur: 10.0 / 11.5; maximum width of femur at mid portion: 0.5 / 0.5; length of tibia: 12.8 / 13.8; length of tarsus: 1.8 / 1.9. Abdomen: length: 11.2 / 11.7; maximum width (measured between outer margins of anterior portion of sternite V): 6.1 / 6.5; maximum distance between outer margins of lobulated prominence of connexival segment V: 9.2 / 8.8. Coloration (Figs 91-93, 96, 97): generally dark brownish with ill-defined scattered pale portions or markings on head, femora and sternites; hemelytra, except basal portion, paler, more in the paratype. Antenna pale brownish; scape with irregular scattered dark small markings; apex of pedicel dark. The following portions variably paler: glabrous areas of head and fore femora, more intensively in the holotype; inferior margin of fore supracoxal lobe; upper portions of lateral surfaces and apices of femora; a pair of linear markings at basal portions of tibiae; median portion of tergites I-V (Fig. 96), progressively in less extent from the former to the latter; margins of sternites between segments II-VI; on the latter, at each lateral side, a pair of rounded (paratype) or irregular (holotype) small markings on basal margin of these segments and another similar markings between basal and distal margins (Fig. 97). Structure and vestiture (Figs 91 - 97): Postocular region of the head with only one ramose setigerous process posterolaterally at each side (Fig. 94). Processes of scutellum and humeri short. Fore trochanters with two pairs of spiny tubercles on internal surface. Fore femora with a basal group from two to four spiny, relatively small, rounded tubercles, a midline row with eight spiny rounded tubercles and two (holotype) and four (paratype) others close to this row on anterior surface. Fore tarsi bi-segmented; the second segment ~ 3  × as long as the first segment (Fig. 95). Connexival margins of segments III-VI lobulated; those on segments III-V have the external margin sinuated at median portion and a short spiny prominence at latero-distal angle in holotype, while in paratype the external margin is faintly curved without spiny prominences (Figs 91-93, 96, 97). Membrane of hemelytra not reaching apex of abdomen (Figs 91-93). Lateroapical margins of abdomen curved, slightly prominent (Fig. 96). Male terminalia (Figs 98-104): medial process of pygophore subtriangular in anterior view (Fig. 100). </p>
            <p>Etymology.</p>
            <p> The new species is named in honor of Dr. David dos Santos Martins, researcher of the Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa,  Assistência Técnica e  Extensão Rural (INCAPER),  Vitória ,  Espírito Santo, Brazil, for his great contribution to the knowledge of the entomofauna of the State of  Espírito Santo where the new species was found. </p>
            <p>Distribution.</p>
            <p> Brazil (State of  Espírito Santo). </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9DEEB7E418ED57D897334331BADC5D62	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gil-Santana, Helcio R.;Berenger, Jean-Michel;Oliveira, Jader	Gil-Santana, Helcio R., Berenger, Jean-Michel, Oliveira, Jader (2023): A new species of Kodormus Barber, with a redescription of the genus, taxonomic notes, and a key to the species of the genus (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Reduviidae, Stenopodainae). ZooKeys 1181: 265-298, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1181.108463, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1181.108463
1AD542ACD9A35B16981BB68879476D71.text	1AD542ACD9A35B16981BB68879476D71.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Kodormus oscurus Maldonado & Berenger 1996	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> 
Kodormus oscurus Maldonado &amp; 
Berenger
, 1996
</p>
            <p>Figs 105-110</p>
            <p> Kodormus oscurus Maldonado &amp;  Berénger , 1996 in  Bérenger and Maldonado 1996: 35-37, figs 1-7 [description]; Forero 2004: 166 [citation]. </p>
            <p>Notes.</p>
            <p> Kodormus oscurus was described based on 10 males collected in Bolivia (  Bérenger and Maldonado 1996). </p>
            <p>Type material examined.</p>
            <p>Bolivia: Ixiamas, Beni, oct. 1993, 270 m, Bleuzen leg., 1 male paratype; Pucara, Beni, oct. 1993, 750 m, Bleuzen leg., 1 male paratype (J-MB).</p>
            <p>Diagnosis.</p>
            <p> Kodormus oscurus is separated by its general coloration, which is generally dark brown, while in the other species of  Kodormus , it is generally brownish.  Kodormus oscurus seems closer to  K. bruneosus , based on the denticulate latero-distal angles of connexival segments II-VI, but in the latter species these angles are less prominent. </p>
            <p>Description.</p>
            <p>Male. Figs 105-110. Total length: 19.5-25 mm. Coloration (Fig. 105): Generally dark brownish; hemelytra and sternites reddish brown, slightly paler than dark brownish portions. Structure and vestiture (Fig. 105): Postocular region of the head with two ramose setigerous processes posterolaterally at each side, very close to each other, the most posterior one slightly above of the other. Setigerous tubercles on serial line of postocular region of head very numerous, pale and conspicuous; those on the lateral margins of fore lobe of pronotum forming an irregular row, most of them pale. Tubercles on disc of fore lobe flat, rounded. Humeral angle short, spiniform. Process of scutellum short. Membrane of hemelytra varying from not reaching to reaching apex of abdomen. Fore tarsus three-segmented. Lateroapical margins of connexivum conspicuously prominent; those on segments IV and V are apically curved downward in some individuals. Male genitalia (Figs 106-110): medial process of pygophore enlarged; triangular in anterior view (Fig. 108).</p>
            <p>Distribution.</p>
            <p> Bolivia (  Bérenger and Maldonado 1996). </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1AD542ACD9A35B16981BB68879476D71	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gil-Santana, Helcio R.;Berenger, Jean-Michel;Oliveira, Jader	Gil-Santana, Helcio R., Berenger, Jean-Michel, Oliveira, Jader (2023): A new species of Kodormus Barber, with a redescription of the genus, taxonomic notes, and a key to the species of the genus (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Reduviidae, Stenopodainae). ZooKeys 1181: 265-298, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1181.108463, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1181.108463
