identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
9BF80AB95BA051039F948458DA90F020.text	9BF80AB95BA051039F948458DA90F020.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Amphibiperita Fiers & Rutledge 1990	<div><p>Genus  Amphibiperita Fiers &amp; Rutledge, 1990</p><p>Type species.</p><p>Amphibiperita neotropica Fiers &amp; Rutledge, 1990 (type by original designation).</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>As in Fiers and Rutledge (1990: 114).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9BF80AB95BA051039F948458DA90F020	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomez, Samuel;Yanez-Rivera, Beatriz	Gomez, Samuel, Yanez-Rivera, Beatriz (2022): The genus Cletocamptus (Harpacticoida, Canthocamptidae): a reappraisal, with proposal of a new subfamily, a new genus, and a new species. ZooKeys 1080: 165-208, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.71192, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.71192
84E9C87EB715522BB8105FBD8CB8AB35.text	84E9C87EB715522BB8105FBD8CB8AB35.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cletocamptinae Gómez & Yáñez-Rivera 2022	<div><p>Subfamily  Cletocamptinae subfam. nov.</p><p>Type genus.</p><p>Cletocamptus Schmankevitsch, 1875.</p><p>Other genera.</p><p>Amphibiperita Fiers &amp; Rutledge, 1990,  Cletocamptoides gen. nov.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Canthocamptidae . Body fusiform, without clear distinction between prosome and urosome. Without nuchal organs on cephalothorax or body somites. Female rostrum distinct, rarely fused to cephalothorax, large and triangular with broad proximal margin; ornamented with ventral (sub)distal spinules or (occasionally) setules and with rounded or (rarely) bilobed tip in both sexes. Cephalothorax and/or prosomites with posterior margins serrated or ornamented with short or long slender spinules; posterior margin of urosomites except for anal somite serrated or with short spinules; posterior margin of cephalothorax and body somites without or (rarely) with cuticular sensillum-bearing socles. Anal operculum without dorsal ornamentation or with transverse row of strong large or short, small spinules; posterior margin unornamented, serrated, or with small or large spinules. Female genital somite and third urosomite separated dorsolaterally, completely fused ventrally forming genital double-somite. Female antennule six-, rarely seven-segmented. Antenna with allobasis, with one or two abexopodal setae (proximal element basal, distal seta endopodal); exopod one-segmented, longer than wide or minute, or absent. Mandibular palp one-segmented, very small and wider than long, or longer than wide; basis and endopod incorporated to basis or (rarely) with basis and endopod distinct (uniramous); exopod absent or (rarely) represented by single seta; when palp uniramous, then basis unarmed or with one seta, endopod with three setae at most; when palp one-segmented and longer than wide, then with two basal and two endopodal setae at most, and exopod (when present) represented by single seta; when palp one-segmented very small and wider than long, then basis and endopod not discernible, with one or two (most probably endopodal) setae, with or without surface (most probably exopodal) seta on coxa. Maxillule with endopod and exopod incorporated to basis; praecoxal arthrite with ventral seta thick and strongly spinulose, or slender and pinnate or smooth. Maxilla with two syncoxal endites; endopod completely incorporated to allobasis. Maxilliped subchelate; syncoxa with one seta; basis unarmed; claw with accessory seta. P1 not prehensile, rarely prehensile; P1-P4EXP three-segmented; female P1-P3ENP two-segmented, P4ENP two- or one-segmented; inner exopodal and endopodal setae with or without comb tip. Female P5EXP and BENP fused, occasionally separated; both baseoendopods of P5 separated. Armature formulae as follows:</p><p>iap, inner apophysis; oap, outer apophysis. *The seven-segmented antennule of  C. gravihiatus (Shen &amp; Sung, 1963) requires confirmation.</p><p>Female P6 with one or two setae. Caudal rami with six or seven setae; setae IV and V fused basally or separated.</p><p>Sexual dimorphism can be expressed in a) rostrum slenderer in the male, b) the male antennule (chirocer or subchirocer), c) basis of P1 (with or without inner distal process), d) outer spine on P2 ENP2 (thicker and/or shorter than in the female), e) P2EXP and/or P3 and P4EXP (segments longer than in the female, outer spines stronger than in the female, rami curved inwards,), f) shape of P2-P4ENP (segments thicker than in female), g) P3ENP (two- or three-segmented; when three-segmented then inner apophysis on second segment; when two-segmented then inner apophysis medially or subdistally on second segment, occasionally with additional outer apophysis; inner apophysis simple, without arrow-head tip, variable in length; with or without asprothekes on second segment), h) P5 (both legs fused medially or separated; EXP and BENP fused; both legs separated or fused to somite), i) P6 (composed of two lappets articulated to somite or asymmetrical in which case only one leg functional, the other fused to somite; unarmed or (occasionally) with one or two setae), j) caudal rami (longer than in the female).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/84E9C87EB715522BB8105FBD8CB8AB35	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomez, Samuel;Yanez-Rivera, Beatriz	Gomez, Samuel, Yanez-Rivera, Beatriz (2022): The genus Cletocamptus (Harpacticoida, Canthocamptidae): a reappraisal, with proposal of a new subfamily, a new genus, and a new species. ZooKeys 1080: 165-208, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.71192, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.71192
370F222D1F585CDBBBCE948AA5B0CEB8.text	370F222D1F585CDBBBCE948AA5B0CEB8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cletocamptoides biushelo Gómez & Yáñez-Rivera 2022	<div><p>Cletocamptoides biushelo sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7</p><p>Type locality.</p><p>Urías estuary,  Mazatlán, Sinaloa State, stn. 5 (23.2056°N, 106.3715°W; 0.6 m depth; organic carbon content 0.99%; organic matter content 1.71%; sand 78.61%; clay 6.72%; silt 14.67%) (see also  Gómez 2020: 43, fig. 1).</p><p>Other localities.</p><p>Urías estuary,  Mazatlán, Sinaloa State, stn. 7 (23.2174°N, 106.3917°W; 3.7 m depth; organic carbon content 5.59%; organic matter content 9.62%; sand 10.78%; clay 37.54%; silt 51.68%) (see also  Gómez 2020: 43, fig. 1).</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Female holotype dissected (ICML-EMUCOP-180119-179); 18 Jan. 2019; S.  Gómez leg. One additional female from stn 7 (see above) was used for molecular analyses.</p><p>Description.</p><p>Female. Total body length of holotype 411  µm measured from anterior tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami. Habitus (Fig. 1A, D) semi-cylindrical, progressively tapering posteriad, without clear demarcation between prosome and urosome; body with somitic constrictions between somites; without cuticular sensilla-bearing socles. Prosome (Fig. 1A, D) consisting of cephalothorax, P1-bearing somite fully incorporated to the latter, and three free-pedigerous somites bearing P2-P4. Rostrum (Figs 1A, D, 3A) well-developed, not fused to cephalothorax, triangular, with wide base and rounded tip, with two subdistal sensilla, with row of subdistal spinules ventrally. Cephalothorax with depressions and with sensilla as shown; posterodorsal margin serrated, lateral margin with short slender spinules. P2-P4-bearing somites with posterior sensilla as depicted; posterior margin serrated; lateral margin with short slender spinules. Urosome (Figs 1A, D, 2A) comprising fifth pedigerous somite, genital double-somite, two free abdominal somites, and anal somite. P5-bearing somite largely as in previous somite but with fewer sensilla. Second (genital somite) and third urosomites separated dorsolaterally, fused ventrally forming genital double-somite; first half with posterior margin serrated, posterior half with posterior slender short spinules; both halves with sensilla as shown; anterior half with P6 (see below); posterior half with ventrolateral small slender spinules as depicted. Fourth urosomite largely as preceding somite (second half of genital double-somite), but with more spinules lateroventrally. Fifth somite as previous one dorsolaterally, ventrally with fewer spinular rows. Anal somite slightly wider than long; with small triangular operculum ornamented with small dorsal spinules, flanked by pair of sensilla; ventrally cleft medially, with pair of medial pores, with inner small spinules along inner margin of medial cleft. Caudal rami 1.5  × as long as wide; with inner long slender spinules; with six setae as follows: seta I missing; seta II and III lateral, issuing midway outer margin of ramus, the former proximal to and slightly as long as half the length of the later; seta IV arising at outer distal corner, as long as seta III, with bulbous base; seta V longest, without breaking plane, minutely bipinnate; seta VI issuing at inner distal corner, slightly shorter than seta IV, with two proximal spinules as shown, with bulbous base; dorsal seta VII located at the center of ramus, as long as seta III, tri-articulated at its base.</p><p>Antennule (Fig. 3A) six-segmented; first segment with two inner spinular rows, remaining segments with outer spinular row as depicted; all setae smooth. Armature formula as follows: 1[1], 2[7], 3[4], 4[1+(1+ae)], 5[1], 6[8+(2+ae)].</p><p>Antenna (Fig. 3B) with allobasis ornamented with short longitudinal row of spinules proximally, armed with two abexopodal setae (one basal, one endopodal). Exopod one-segmented, minute, with one seta. Free endopodal segment as long as allobasis, with inner spinules proximally and subdistally, and with outer subdistal frill; with two inner spines and one slender seta medially, distally with two inner spines, two medial geniculate setae, and one outer spinulose element.</p><p>Mandible (Fig. 4A) with well-developed coxa ornamented with short spinular row as shown; gnathobase well-developed, with bi- and unicuspid teeth distally, and one thick bulbous element, and one ventral pinnate seta. Palp one-segmented, with three setae (one basal, two endopodal).</p><p>Maxillule (Fig. 4B) with robust praecoxa ornamented with spinules at base of coxal endite, and medially and ventrally on arthrite, the latter with one surface seta, seven distal spines and one ventral strong unipinnate seta. Coxal endite with two setae. Endopod and exopod incorporated to basis, the latter with four, endopod with one, exopod with two setae.</p><p>Maxilla (Fig. 4C) with syncoxa ornamented with medial and distal rows of small spinules, and with few larger outer spinules; with two endites bearing three setae each. Allobasis drawn out into claw accompanied by one seta. Endopod completely incorporated to basis, represented by three setae.</p><p>Maxilliped (Fig. 4D) subchelate. Syncoxa with spinules as shown, with one subdistal seta. Basis with one anterior and one posterior spinular row, with outer spinules proximally and subdistally. Endopod drawn out into curved claw with minute accessory seta.</p><p>P1 (Fig. 5A) with elongate bare intercoxal sclerite. Praecoxa triangular, with medial subdistal row of spinules. Coxa rectangular, wider than long, with two medial transverse rows of spinules as shown, and one posterior and one anterior short row of larger spinules close to outer margin. Basis with anterior spinules medially, on outer margin, at base of inner and outer spines, and between rami. Exopod three-segmented, situated at a lower level than the endopod, reaching tip of ENP2; segments with outer and subdistal spinules as shown; EXP1 without, EXP2 with inner seta; EXP3 with two outer spines and two distal setae of which innermost geniculate. Endopod two segmented, not prehensile; segments with inner and outer long slender spinules as depicted; ENP1 unarmed; ENP2 with three setae.</p><p>P2-P3 (Figs 5B, 6A) with elongate bare intercoxal sclerite. Praecoxa triangular, with transverse row of spinules as shown. Coxa rectangular, wider than long; with one medial and one outer spinular row. Basis with spinules medially, at base of endopod, and between rami; with outer seta (of P2 visibly shorter than in P3). Exopod three-segmented, situated at a lower level than endopod; spinular ornamentation of segments as shown; EXP1 and EXP2 with, EXP3 without inner distal frill; EXP1 without, EXP2 with inner seta with comb tip; EXP3 with one inner element without comb tip, two distal setae, and two outer spines. Endopod two-segmented; segments with spinular ornamentation as shown; ENP1 small, as long as wide, unarmed; ENP2 elongated, with three setae.</p><p>P4 (Fig. 6B) with intercoxal sclerite, praecoxa, coxa and basis as in P3. Exopod largely as in P3 except for two apical setae, and two outer spines on EXP3. Endopod one-segmented, minute, wider than long; with two setae of which innermost reduced.</p><p>P1-P5 armature formulae as follows:</p><p>P5 (Fig. 2B) with baseoendopod and exopod fused, rami separated by shallow notch; spinular ornamentation as shown. Baseoendopod with outer seta arising from short setophore; endopodal lobe with five setae. Exopod with three setae.</p><p>Genital field (Fig. 2A) with median copulatory pore on second half of genital double-somite; each P6 represented by two setae.</p><p>Male. Unknown.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The specific epithet is an anagram for "  Cletocamptus helobius " and refers to the close relationship between the Mexican new species and  C. helobius comb. nov.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/370F222D1F585CDBBBCE948AA5B0CEB8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomez, Samuel;Yanez-Rivera, Beatriz	Gomez, Samuel, Yanez-Rivera, Beatriz (2022): The genus Cletocamptus (Harpacticoida, Canthocamptidae): a reappraisal, with proposal of a new subfamily, a new genus, and a new species. ZooKeys 1080: 165-208, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.71192, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.71192
8657F5613AFC5EE7A299C1FCB378CD4D.text	8657F5613AFC5EE7A299C1FCB378CD4D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cletocamptoides Gómez & Yáñez-Rivera 2022	<div><p>Genus  Cletocamptoides gen. nov.</p><p>Type species.</p><p>Cletocamptoides merbokensis (Gee, 1999) comb. nov. (=  Cletocamptus merbokensis Gee, 1999)</p><p>Other species.</p><p>Cletocamptoides helobius (Fleeger, 1980) comb. nov. (=  Cletocamptus helobius Fleeger, 1980),  Cletocamptoides biushelo sp. nov.</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Canthocamptidae . Body fusiform, without clear distinction between prosome and urosome; body with somitic constrictions between somites. Without nuchal organs on cephalothorax or body somites. Female rostrum distinct, large, and triangular with broad proximal margin; ornamented with ventral (sub)distal spinules or setules; with rounded or bilobed tip. Cephalothorax and/or prosomites with posterior margins serrated; posterior margin of urosomites except for anal somite serrated; posterior margin of cephalothorax and body somites without or with cuticular sensillum-bearing socles. Anal operculum without dorsal ornamentation or with transverse row of mall spinules; posterior margin unornamented or serrated. Female genital somite and third urosomite separated dorsolaterally, completely fused ventrally forming genital double-somite. Female antennule six-segmented. Antenna with allobasis, with one or two abexopodal setae (proximal element basal, distal seta endopodal); exopod one-segmented and minute, or absent. Mandibular palp one-segmented, longer than wide; endopod incorporated to basis, with two basal and two endopodal setae at most; exopod absent or represented by single seta. Maxillule with endopod and exopod incorporated to basis; praecoxal arthrite with ventral seta thick and strongly spinulose, or slender and pinnate. Maxilla with two syncoxal endites; endopod completely incorporated to allobasis. Maxilliped subchelate; syncoxa unarmed or with one seta; basis unarmed; claw with accessory seta. P1ENP not prehensile; P1-P4EXP three-segmented; female P1-P3ENP two-segmented, P4ENP one-segmented; inner exopodal and endopodal setae with or without comb tip. Female P5EXP and BENP fused, separated by shallow or deep notch; both baseoendopods of P5 separated. Armature formulae as follows:</p><p>iap, inner apophysis; oap, outer apophysis.</p><p>Female P6 with two setae. Caudal rami slightly convergent; with six setae; setae IV and V separated; seta IV normal, whip-like, slightly tapering posteriad, or with bulbous base.</p><p>Sexual dimorphism can be expressed in a) the male antennule (subchirocer), b) setae on P2 ENP2 (spiniform as in  C. merbokensis comb. nov.), c) P3ENP (two- or three-segmented; when three-segmented then inner apophysis on second segment ( C. merbokensis comb. nov.); when two-segmented then inner apophysis subdistally on second segment ( C. helobius comb. nov.); inner apophysis simple, without arrow-head tip, variable in length), d) P5 (both legs fused medially ( C. merbokensis comb. nov.) or separated ( C. helobius comb. nov.); EXP and BENP fused; both legs separated ( C. helobius comb. nov.) or fused to somite ( C. merbokensis comb. nov.)), e) P6.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The Ancient Greek sufix  εἶδος,  eîdos, meaning likeness and refers to the resemblance of the new genus with  Cletocamptus .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8657F5613AFC5EE7A299C1FCB378CD4D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomez, Samuel;Yanez-Rivera, Beatriz	Gomez, Samuel, Yanez-Rivera, Beatriz (2022): The genus Cletocamptus (Harpacticoida, Canthocamptidae): a reappraisal, with proposal of a new subfamily, a new genus, and a new species. ZooKeys 1080: 165-208, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.71192, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.71192
10CB08EB30C9590D9396656D50EE9C32.text	10CB08EB30C9590D9396656D50EE9C32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cletocamptus Schmankevitsch 1875	<div><p>Genus  Cletocamptus Schmankevitsch, 1875</p><p>Type species.</p><p>Cletocamptus retrogressus Schmankevitsch, 1875 (type by original designation).</p><p>Other species.</p><p>Cletocamptus affinis Kiefer, 1957,  C. albuquerquensis (Herrick, 1894),  C. assimilis Gomez &amp; Gee, 2009,  C. axi Mielke, 2000,  C. cecsurirensis Gómez, Scheihing &amp; Labarca, 2007,  C. chappuisi Gómez, Gerber &amp;  Fuentes-Reinés, 2017,  Cletocamptus confluens (Schmeil, 1894),  C. deborahdexterae Gómez, Fleeger, Rocha-Olivares &amp; Foltz, 2004,  C. dominicanus Kiefer, 1934,  C. feei (Shen, 1956),  C. fourchensis Gómez, Fleeger, Rocha-Olivares &amp; Foltz, 2004,  C. goenchim Gómez, Ingole, Sawant &amp; Singh, 2013,  C. gomezi Suárez-Morales, Barrera-Moreno &amp;  Ciros-Pérez, 2013,  C. gravihiatus (Shen &amp; Sung, 1963),  C. koreanus Chang, 2013,  C. levis Gómez, 2005,  C. mongolicus Stĕrba, 1968,  C. nudus Gómez, 2005,  C. pilosus Gomez &amp; Gee, 2009,  C. samariensis Fuentes-Reinés, Zoppi de Roa &amp; Torres, 2015,  C. schmidti Mielke, 2000,  C. sinaloensis Gómez, Fleeger, Rocha-Olivares &amp; Foltz, 2004,  C. spinulosus Gomez &amp; Gee, 2009,  C. stimpsoni Gómez, Fleeger, Rocha-Olivares &amp; Foltz, 2004,  C. tainoi Gómez, Gerber &amp;  Fuentes-Reinés, 2017,  C. tertius Gomez &amp; Gee, 2009,  C. trichotus Kiefer, 1929.</p><p>Species incertae sedis.</p><p>Marshia brevicaudata Herrick, 1894.</p><p>Species inquirendae.</p><p>Cletocamptus bermudae Willey, 1930,  C. cfr. bicolor sensu Herbst (1960),  C. brehmi Kiefer, 1933,  Cletocamptus deitersi (Richard, 1897),  C. deitersi sensu Chappuis (1934),  C. deitersi sensu Daday (1902),  C. deitersi sensu Dussart (1974),  C. deitersi sensu Hamond (1973),  C. deitersi sensu Herbst (1960),  C. deitersi sensu Kiefer (1936),  C. deitersi sensu  Suárez-Morales et al. (1996),  C. deitersi sensu Tai and Song (1979),  C. ecuadorianus Löffler, 1963,  C. gabrieli Löffler, 1961,  C. kummleri (Delachaux, 1917),  Godotella dadayi Delachaux, 1917.</p><p>Doubtful records.</p><p>C. deitersi: in Apostolov (1984), Brehm (1936, 1965), Chappuis (1936), Dussart and Frutos (1986), Loftus and Reid (2000), Oliveira et al. (1971), Ranga Reddy and Radhakrishna (1979), Ringuelet (1958a, 1958b, 1960, 1962), Ringuelet et al. (1967), Ruber et al. (1994), Sitjar (1988),  Zamudio-Valdéz (1991).</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Canthocamptidae:  Cletocamptinae . Body fusiform, without clear distinction between prosome and urosome. Without nuchal organs on cephalothorax or body somites. Female rostrum distinct, rarely fused to cephalothorax, large and triangular with broad proximal margin; ornamented with ventral (sub)distal spinules and with rounded tip in both sexes. Posterior margin of cephalothorax and/or prosomites with long and slender, or short spinules, or serrated; posterior margin of urosomites except for anal somite with short spinules or serrated; body somites without cuticular sensillum-bearing socles; anal operculum without dorsal ornamentation or with transverse row of strong, large, or short, small spinules; posterior margin unornamented, or with small or large spinules. Female genital somite and third urosomite separated dorsolaterally, completely fused ventrally forming genital double-somite. Female antennule six-, rarely seven-segmented (the latter reported for  C. gravihiatus requires confirmation). Antenna with allobasis, with one or two abexopodal setae (proximal element basal, distal seta endopodal); exopod one-segmented and longer than wide, or minute, rarely represented by single seta (the latter reported for  C. chappuisi requires confirmation). Mandibular palp one-segmented, rarely two-segmented (basis and endopod distinct as in  C. retrogressus); when one-segmented, then very small and wider than long, or as long as wide ( C. dominicanus), or longer than wide ( C. confluens,  C. gomezi); when palp one-segmented, then basis and endopod not discernible, rarely discernible (represented by single seta as in  C. confluens and  C. dominicanus); endopod with two setae, rarely with one single element ( C. pilosus); exopod absent; with or without surface (most probably exopodal) seta on coxa, the latter present only in some species with a one-segmented palp wider than long, absent in species with palp as long as wide or longer than wide. Maxillule with endopod and exopod incorporated to basis; praecoxal arthrite with ventral seta thick and strongly spinulose, or slender and pinnate or smooth. Maxilla with two syncoxal endites; endopod completely incorporated to allobasis. Maxilliped subchelate; syncoxa with one seta; basis unarmed; claw with accessory seta. P1ENP not prehensile; P1-P4EXP three-segmented; female P1-P3ENP two-segmented, P4ENP two- or one-segmented; inner exopodal and endopodal setae with or without comb tip (see  Gómez et al. 2017). Female P5EXP and BENP fused; both baseoendopods of P5 separated. Armature formulae as follows:</p><p>iap, inner apophysis; oap, outer apophysis; * two-segmented with one inner apophysis on second segment in  C. albuquerquensis,  C. chappuisi,  C. dominicanus,  C. tainoi; ** two segmented, with one inner and one outer apophysis on second segment in  C. confluens; *** one-segmented in  C. dominicanus; + the seven setae observed in  C. gravihiatus requires confirmation</p><p>Female P6 with one or two setae. Caudal rami with six or seven setae; setae IV and V fused basally or separated.</p><p>Sexual dimorphism expressed in a) rostrum (slenderer than in female), b) the male antennule (subchirocer), c) basis of P1 (with inner distal process), d) outer spine on P2 ENP2 (thicker and/or shorter than in the female), e) P3ENP (three-segmented as in most species, or two-segmented as in  C. albuquerquensis,  C. chappuisi,  C. confluens,  C. dominicanus, and  C. tainoi; when three-segmented then inner apophysis on second segment; when two-segmented then inner apophysis medially as in  C. dominicanus, or subdistally on second segment as in  C. albuquerquensis,  C. chappuisi,  C. confluens, and  C. tainoi, but occasionally with additional outer apophysis as in  C. confluens), f) P5 (both legs fused medially as in most species, or separated as in  C. axi,  C. cecsurirensis,  C. retrogressus, and  C. schmidti; EXP and BENP fused, and both legs articulating with somite, g) P6 (composed of two lappets articulated to somite and unarmed as in most species or, occasionally, with one seta attributable to intraspecific variability as in  C. axi,  C. schmidti,  C. sinaloensis). Additionally, sexual dimorphism can be expressed also (depending on the species) in a) P2EXP and/or P3 and P4EXP (segments longer than in the female, outer spines stronger than in the female, and/or rami curved inwards as in  C. retrogressus,  C. confluens,  C. albuquerquensis,  C. samariensis,  C. spinulosus,  C. tainoi,  C. trichotus), b) shape of P2-P4ENP (segments thicker than in female as in  C. confluens), c) caudal rami (longer than in the female).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/10CB08EB30C9590D9396656D50EE9C32	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomez, Samuel;Yanez-Rivera, Beatriz	Gomez, Samuel, Yanez-Rivera, Beatriz (2022): The genus Cletocamptus (Harpacticoida, Canthocamptidae): a reappraisal, with proposal of a new subfamily, a new genus, and a new species. ZooKeys 1080: 165-208, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.71192, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.71192
