identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
A63387A9F254FFEBFF30FADBE9D5FEA8.text	A63387A9F254FFEBFF30FADBE9D5FEA8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Capnodium coartatum Chomnunti & K. D. Hyde	<div><p>Capnodium coartatum Chomnunti &amp; K.D. Hyde,</p> <p>in Chomnunti et al., Fungal Diversity 51(1): 117 (2011)</p> <p>Index Fungorum number: IF563362 (FIGURE 2)</p> <p>Colonies saprobic sooty mold-like, growing on leaves of Carica papaya L. Thallus dark brown to black, dense, easily removed from the host, composed of dark brown to brown, septate hyphae (FIGURE 2a, b). Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Pycnidia 230–312 × 25–40 μm (x = 278 × 32 μm, n = 10), scattered or gregarious, blackish brown or slightly greenish, synnematous in structure, ovoid to flask-shaped, elongate, somewhat branched, comprising mostly cylindrical cell, with slight swollen or flattened base (FIGURE 2d, f, g). Ostiole surrounded by hyaline hyphae (FIGURE 2e), upper cylindric region tapering to apex. Conidia 3.9–5.6 × 1.9–2.7 μm (x = 4.6 × 2.3 μm, n = 15), ellipsoidal, smooth, round ends, hyaline, produced within the base of pycnidia, gathering in a terminal droplet on ostiole (FIGURE 2h).</p> <p>Material examined: THAILAND, Payao Province, on living leaf of Carica papaya L. (Caricaceae), 29 October 2022, N Suwannarach SDBR-CMUPPY01.1= CMUB40023, living culture SDBR-CMU477.</p> <p>Notes: Our sooty mold collection was found on living leaves of Carica papaya. On a single leaf specimen, we observed 2–3 carcasses of aphids and scale insects. However, it remains challenging to definitively identify which of these insects serves as the primary source of sugar excretions, which are nutritional resources for Capnodium coartatum. In phylogenetic analysis (FIGURE 1), our strain (SDBR-CMU477) grouped with other strains of Ca. coartatum (CPC1779, MLFUCC10-0070, and MLFUCC10-0069), with 70% ML and 0.93 PP support (FIGURE 1). Our strain (SDBR-CMU477) is morphologically identical to Ca. coartatum. However, it has shorter and slightly thinner pycnidia compared to the type material of Ca. coartatum described by Chomnunti et al. (2011) (230–312 × 25–40 vs. 332–401 × 34–56 μm). All these specimens have longer pycnidia than those of CPC1779, identified as Ca. coartatum by Abdollahzadeh et al. (2020) (115–203 μm high). Moreover, the pycnidia of SDBR-CMU477 has a blackish brown or slightly greenish color, while the pycnidia of the other strains have been reported as blackish brown pycnidia. Although there are minor variations between our strain and others in the size and color of pycnidia, the multigene-phylogenetic analysis conducted in this study indicates that they are identical. Therefore, our collection is the first report of Ca. coartatum from Carica papaya.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A63387A9F254FFEBFF30FADBE9D5FEA8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya;Withee, Patchareeya;Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Marasinghe, Diana S.;Hongsanan, Sinang	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya, Withee, Patchareeya, Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan, Suwannarach, Nakarin, Marasinghe, Diana S., Hongsanan, Sinang (2023): Unraveling Capnodiaceae species in Northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 620 (2): 143-156, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2
A63387A9F254FFE8FF30FF27EE64FDA3.text	A63387A9F254FFE8FF30FF27EE64FDA3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Capnodium Mont.	<div><p>Capnodium Mont.</p> <p>Capnodium was introduced by Montagne (1849) as the type genus of Capnodiaceae. Species of this genus are one of the most common sooty molds with diverse host range in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide (Chomnunti et al. 2011, 2014; Hongsanan et al. 2015, 2020). These species are frequently found co-occurring with other species and share morphological similarities. The sexual and asexual morphs of this genus can be found together on the same substrate. One hundred fifty (150) epithets of Capnodium species listed in Index Fungorum (2023). Nevertheless, sequence data of only 12 species are available in GenBank. In this study, we validate Capnodium paracoartatum, and provide newly obtained sequence data for Ca. coartatum and Ca. gamsii, both of which are new host records.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A63387A9F254FFE8FF30FF27EE64FDA3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya;Withee, Patchareeya;Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Marasinghe, Diana S.;Hongsanan, Sinang	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya, Withee, Patchareeya, Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan, Suwannarach, Nakarin, Marasinghe, Diana S., Hongsanan, Sinang (2023): Unraveling Capnodiaceae species in Northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 620 (2): 143-156, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2
A63387A9F254FFE8FF30FD8FEAA3FB57.text	A63387A9F254FFE8FF30FD8FEAA3FB57.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Capnodium paracoartatum S. Thungdee, S. Hongsanan, & R. Cheewangkoon 2023	<div><p>Capnodium paracoartatum Q. Tian, W.J. Li &amp; K.D. Hyde ex S. Thungdee, S. Hongsanan, &amp; R. Cheewangkoon, sp. nov.</p> <p>Index Fungorum number: IF900896</p> <p>Typification details: Holotype, MFLU 19-2888; ex-type living culture, MFLUCC 14-0282.</p> <p>Distribution: Thailand</p> <p>Host: on living leaves of Ficus sp. (Moraceae)</p> <p>Originally described as Capnodium paracoartatum Q. Tian, W.J. Li &amp; K.D. Hyde, in Li &amp; Hyde, Fungal Diversity 100: 372 (2020) in Li et al. (2020), Nom. inval., Art. F.5.1 (Shenzhen).</p> <p>Notes: Capnodium paracoartatum was first introduced by Li et al. (2020). However, it was shown as invalid due to the absence of a required identifier citation, as per ‘Nom. inval., Art. F.5.1 Shenzhen’ (Index Fungorum (2023). This species was reported as saprobic on sugary exudates from insects and produced a thallus on the leaf surface. This thallus comprises brown to pale brown, sub-cylindrical, irregularly branched, septate, and constricted at the septa mycelium. The sexual morph of this species is similar to Ca. coartatum and the asexual morph of Ca. paracoartatum differs from Ca. coartatum by its conidial size. Li et al. (2020) mentioned that using conidial size alone is insufficient to distinguish Capnodium species. However, based on phylogenetic analyses, it has been determined that Ca. paracoartatum is a distinct species (Li et al. 2020, FIGURE 1 in this study). Consequently, we hereby validly establish Ca. paracoartatum as a recognized species.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A63387A9F254FFE8FF30FD8FEAA3FB57	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya;Withee, Patchareeya;Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Marasinghe, Diana S.;Hongsanan, Sinang	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya, Withee, Patchareeya, Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan, Suwannarach, Nakarin, Marasinghe, Diana S., Hongsanan, Sinang (2023): Unraveling Capnodiaceae species in Northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 620 (2): 143-156, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2
A63387A9F257FFE5FF30F9BFE803FF72.text	A63387A9F257FFE5FF30F9BFE803FF72.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Capnodium gamsii Abdollahz. & Crous	<div><p>Capnodium gamsii Abdollahz. &amp; Crous, in Abdollahzadeh et al., Stud. Mycol. 95: 395 (2020)</p> <p>Index Fungorum number: IF833152 (FIGURE 3)</p> <p>Colonies saprobic sooty mold-like, growing on living leaves of Manihot esculenta and Broussonetia papyrifera (FIGURE 3a, b). Mycelium developing on the surface of the plant leaves, hyaline to brown in color, branching, thin-walled, septate, and constricted at the septa (FIGURE 3i). Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Pycnidia 220–360 × 20–55 μm (x = 258 × 38 μm, n = 10) on M. esculenta, and 223–280 × 25–34 μm (x = 230 × 30 μm, n = 10) on B. papyrifera, superficial, slender or flask-shaped, simple, occur singly or in groups, medium to dark brown, sometimes slightly greenish, synnematous in structure (FIGURE 3d–f). Ostiole surrounded by hyaline hyphae (FIGURE 3h), upper cylindrical region tapering to apex. Conidia 4.2–6.6 × 2.5–3.6 μm (x = 5.9 × 3.0 μm, n = 15) on M. esculenta, and 4.4–5.0 × 2.1–2.6 μm (x = 4.7 × 2.4 μm, n = 10) on B. papyrifera, oblong to ellipsoid, aseptate, hyaline, with 2-guttules (FIGURE 3k, i).</p> <p>Material examined: THAILAND, Payao Province, on living leaf of Manihot esculenta (Solanaceae), 29 October 2022, N Suwannarach SDBR-CMUPTT01.1 = CMUB40025, living culture in SDBR-CMU479; Payao Province, on living leaf of Broussonetia papyrifera (Paper mulberry), 29 October 2022, N Suwannarach SDBR-CMUBPP01.1 = CMUB40024, living culture in SDBR-CMU476.</p> <p>Notes: Our sooty mold collections, SDBR-CMU476 and SDBR-CMU479, were found on living leaves of Broussonetia papyrifera, and Manihot esculenta, respectively. We found a few carcasses of aphids on both plant species. In our phylogenetic analyses (FIGURE 1), both strains grouped with other strains of Capnodium gamsii (CBS 892.73, CBS 146153, CBS 146154, CBS 146155, CBS 146156, and MFLUCC10-0066) (76% ML/ 0.97 PP). The morphological characteristics of SDBR-CMU476 and SDBR-CMU479 are identical to Ca. gamsii. However, SDBR-CMU479 has shorter pycnidia (220–360 × 20–55 μm vs. 210–420 × 22–35 μm) and larger conidia (4.2–6.6 × 2.5–3.6 μm vs. 3.6–8.1 × 1.6–2.9 μm) than those of the type material of Ca. gamsii described by Abdollahzadeh et al. (2020). Furthermore, SDBR-CMU476 has smaller conidia compared to the type material (4.4–5.0 × 2.1–2.6 μm vs. 3.6–8.1 × 1.6–2.9 μm) (Abdollahzadeh et al. 2020). In addition, our collection, CMUB40025 has a darker brown pycnidia, and CMUB40024 has a slightly greenish to brown pycnidia, while the type material has medium to dark brown pycnidia. Based on the morphology and phylogeny, we identified our collection as Ca. gamsii, and this is the first report of Ca. gamsii from Broussonetia papyrifera and Manihot esculenta.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A63387A9F257FFE5FF30F9BFE803FF72	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya;Withee, Patchareeya;Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Marasinghe, Diana S.;Hongsanan, Sinang	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya, Withee, Patchareeya, Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan, Suwannarach, Nakarin, Marasinghe, Diana S., Hongsanan, Sinang (2023): Unraveling Capnodiaceae species in Northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 620 (2): 143-156, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2
A63387A9F259FFE5FF30FEF8EE63FDEB.text	A63387A9F259FFE5FF30FEF8EE63FDEB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Conidiocarpus Woron.	<div><p>Conidiocarpus Woron.</p> <p>Conidiocarpus was initially identified as the asexual form of Phragmocapnias (Hughes 1976) and considered as a synonym for Phragmocapnias (Chomnunti et al. 2011, 2014, Hongsanan et al. 2015). Bose et al. (2014) followed Hughes (1976) and transferred Phragmocapnias species to Conidiocarpus following the rules of nomenclatural priority. However, Abdollahzadeh et al. (2020) recognized them as separate genera based on morphology and phylogeny. There are 14 epithets listed in Index Fungorum (2023) for Conidiocarpus. However, sequence data is available for only four species: Co. asiaticus, Co. caucasicus, Co. plumeriae, and Co. siamensis. Moreover, Co. philippinensis is classified as a member of Chaetocapnodium, and Co. betle is placed within Phragmocapnias (Abdollahzadeh et al. 2020).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A63387A9F259FFE5FF30FEF8EE63FDEB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya;Withee, Patchareeya;Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Marasinghe, Diana S.;Hongsanan, Sinang	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya, Withee, Patchareeya, Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan, Suwannarach, Nakarin, Marasinghe, Diana S., Hongsanan, Sinang (2023): Unraveling Capnodiaceae species in Northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 620 (2): 143-156, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2
A63387A9F259FFE4FF30FD40EA5BFC21.text	A63387A9F259FFE4FF30FD40EA5BFC21.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Conidiocarpus caucasicus Woron.	<div><p>Conidiocarpus caucasicus Woron., Key to fungi (fungi imperfecti) 2: 743 (1917)</p> <p>Index Fungorum number: IF 803878; FIGURE 4</p> <p>= Conidiocarpus asiaticus (Chomnunti &amp; K.D. Hyde) T. Bose, in Bose, Reynolds &amp; Burbee, Mycologia 106(4): 751 (2014)</p> <p>= Conidiocarpus siamensis (Chomnunti &amp; K.D. Hyde) T. Bose, in Bose, Reynolds &amp; Burbee, Mycologia 106(4): 753 (2014)</p> <p>Saprobic sooty mold-like, growing on living leaves Mangifera indica. Thallus thin, dark brown, reticulately branched, dense, easily removed from the host surface, composed of brown, septate hyphae. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Pycnidia 650–1080 × 40–60 μm (x = 875 × 50 μm, n = 10), solitary to gregarious, superficial, black to dark brown, subcylindrical, straight or variously curved, unbranched or branched, thick-walled, swollen, narrow globose, brown, cylindrical, long-stalked. Ostiole surrounded by hyaline, subulate, hyphal extensions tapering to apex. Conidia 4.2–4.7 × 2.0–2.6 μm (x = 4.5 × 2.3 μm, n = 10), small, ellipsoid, continuous, aseptate, hyaline, smooth-walled, arranged in a droplet at the apex of pycnidial neck.</p> <p>Material examined: THAILAND, Payao Province, on living leaf of Mangifera indica (Anacardiaceae), 4 November 2022, S Hongsanan SDBR-CMUMG01 = CMUB 40026, living culture SDBR-CMU 478.</p> <p>Notes: Our collection of Conidiocarpus caucasicus (SDBR-CMU 478) was collected in Thailand (Payao Province). We observed 1–2 carcasses of aphids on a single leaf of our specimen. The strain SDBR-CMU 478 is morphologically identical to Co. caucasicus in having dark brown, dense, thallus, long-stalked, black to dark brown pycnidia with hyaline, aseptate, ellipsoid conidia (Abdollahzadeh et al. 2020). According to our phylogenetic analysis (FIGURE 1), our strain (SDBR-CMU 478) clustered together with Co. asiticus (MFLUCC 10-0062), Co. caucasicus (GUMH 937), and Co. siamensis (MFLUCC 10-0064/10-0063). Moreover, our phylogenetic result is consistent with those of Abdollahzadeh et al. (2020), confirming that the strains of Co. asiticus, Co. caucasicus, and Co. siamensis were not well-separated taxa with significant phylogenetical interference. Herein, we synonymized these species under Co. caucasicus giving priority to the oldest name. Furthermore, the strain of Co. siamensis (MFLUCC 10-0061) formed a distinct clade with Conidiocarpus sp. (CPC 20464 and CPC 20468) to the basal of Conidiocarpus clade. This may be due to inconsistencies in the availability of gene regions. We observed that the ITS base pair difference between MFLUCC 10-0061 strain and other Co. siamensis strains lacks enough phylogenetic significance (1.4%) to delineate it as a distinct species.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A63387A9F259FFE4FF30FD40EA5BFC21	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya;Withee, Patchareeya;Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Marasinghe, Diana S.;Hongsanan, Sinang	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya, Withee, Patchareeya, Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan, Suwannarach, Nakarin, Marasinghe, Diana S., Hongsanan, Sinang (2023): Unraveling Capnodiaceae species in Northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 620 (2): 143-156, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2
A63387A9F258FFE7FF30FA7DEA9CFE1D.text	A63387A9F258FFE7FF30FA7DEA9CFE1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Phragmocapnias betle (Syd., P. Syd. & E. J. Butler) Theiss. & Syd., Annls	<div><p>Phragmocapnias betle (Syd., P. Syd. &amp; E.J. Butler) Theiss. &amp; Syd., Annls mycol. 15(6): 480 (1918) [1917]</p> <p>Index Fungorum number: IF151279; FIGURE 5</p> <p>Colonies saprobic, sooty mold-like, growing on leaves of Rosa × damascena (Rosaceae) (FIGURE 5a, b). Thallus, dark mycelium growing cover leave surface, black, pelliculose. Mycelium superficial or immersed, hyaline to brown, branched, hyphae smooth, thin-walled, septate (FIGURE 5g). Ascomata 90–100 high × up to 120 μm diam. (x = 117 × 98 μm, n = 5), scattered, subglobose to broadly ellipsoidal, firmly attached to the radiating basal hyphae, pale brown, thick-walled, with ostiole when mature. Peridium 14–18 μm wide, pale to dark brown, cells arranged in a textura angularis (FIGURE 5f). Asci 38–48 × 17–27 μm (x = 45 × 23 μm, n = 7), 8-spored, bitunicate, broadly clavate, with short pedicle, (FIGURE 5h, i). Ascospores 20–23× 5–6.5 μm (x = 22 × 6 μm, n = 10), hyaline, 4–5-septate, fasciculate, cylindric clavate, ends rounded, upper cell slightly wider than the lower cell, smooth-walled, some surrounded by tiny sheath (FIGURE 5j).</p> <p>Material examined: THAILAND, Chiang Mai Province, on living leaves of Rosa × damascena (Rosaceae), 10 October 2022, S Hongsanan SDBR-CMURS02.1/1= CMUB40027, living culture in SDBR-CMU480</p> <p>Note: Our sooty mold collection (SDBR-CMU480) was found on living leaves of Rosa × damascena (Rosaceae). We could not identify the primary insect responsible for producing the sugar excretions that serve as nutrition resources for the sooty mold. Instead, we observed 1–2 black garden ants moving around the leaves. In the phylogenetic analysis (FIGURE 1), this strain grouped with other strains of Phragmocapnias betle (CPC 17762, CPC 20476, CPC 21379, and MFLUCC10-0053), with 88% ML/ 1.00 PP support.The morphological characteristics of SDBR-CMU480 are identical to those epitype specimens of Ph. betle described by Chomnunti et al. (2011). However, our strain SDBR-CMU480 has larger ascomata (90–100 × up to 120 μm diam. vs. 82–93 × 84–105 μm diam.). The size of asci and ascospores in our strain resemble those of the epitype specimen (asci: 38–48 × 17–27 μm vs. 43–53 × 13–33 μm, ascospores: 20–23× 5–6.5 μm vs. 20–24 × 4.8–5.8 μm, Chomnunti et al. 2011). Based on the morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses, we identified our collection as Ph. betle and this is the first report of Ca. coartatum from Rosa × damascena (Rosaceae).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A63387A9F258FFE7FF30FA7DEA9CFE1D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya;Withee, Patchareeya;Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Marasinghe, Diana S.;Hongsanan, Sinang	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya, Withee, Patchareeya, Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan, Suwannarach, Nakarin, Marasinghe, Diana S., Hongsanan, Sinang (2023): Unraveling Capnodiaceae species in Northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 620 (2): 143-156, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2
A63387A9F258FFE4FF30FC09E96DFA0C.text	A63387A9F258FFE4FF30FC09E96DFA0C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Phragmocapnias Theiss. & Syd.	<div><p>Phragmocapnias Theiss. &amp; Syd.</p> <p>Phragmocapnias was previously linked with Conidiocarpus and accepted as the sexual morph of Conidiocarpus. According to the nomenclatural rule of one name for one fungus, Bose et al. (2014) concluded that Conidiocarpus should be treated as a synonym of Phragmocapnias for these interconnected genera. Apart from Ph. philippinensis, all species within Phragmocapnias were transferred to Conidiocarpus by Bose et al. (2014). Following Bose et al. (2014), Hongsanan et al. (2015) synonymized Ph. philippinensis under Co. philippinensis. Abdollahzadeh et al. (2020) revealed that the type species of Conidiocarpus and Phragmocapnias formed as two distinct clades, representing two separate genera. While, two strains of Conidiocarpus (Co. betle and Co. plumeriae) clustered with Phragmocapnias clade (Abdollahzadeh et al. 2020, this study). Consequently, Ph. betle is resurrected, and Co. plumeriae was transferred to Phragmocapnias (Abdollahzadeh et al. 2020). In this study, we provide a new strain for Ph. betle, introducing the new host record from Rosa × damascena.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A63387A9F258FFE4FF30FC09E96DFA0C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya;Withee, Patchareeya;Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan;Suwannarach, Nakarin;Marasinghe, Diana S.;Hongsanan, Sinang	Haituk, Supitchakorn Thungdee Sukanya, Withee, Patchareeya, Cheewangkoon, Ratchadawan, Suwannarach, Nakarin, Marasinghe, Diana S., Hongsanan, Sinang (2023): Unraveling Capnodiaceae species in Northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 620 (2): 143-156, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.620.2.2
