taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03C7246A7930FFEDBFEDFF49FC351D5A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10080552/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10080552	FIGURE 1. Main characteristics of Celtis flumeniana Zamengo.—A. Habit. B. Trunk. C. Leaf, abaxial surface. D. Domatia. E. Cyme. F. Staminate flower. G. Pistillate flower. H. Immature drupes. I. Mature drupe. J. Pyrenes. J1. Monoapiculate pyrene. J2. Biapiculate pyrene.	FIGURE 1. Main characteristics of Celtis flumeniana Zamengo.—A. Habit. B. Trunk. C. Leaf, abaxial surface. D. Domatia. E. Cyme. F. Staminate flower. G. Pistillate flower. H. Immature drupes. I. Mature drupe. J. Pyrenes. J1. Monoapiculate pyrene. J2. Biapiculate pyrene.	2023-10-19	Zamengo, Henrique Borges;Gaglioti, André Luiz;Pederneiras, Leandro Cardoso		Zenodo	biologists	Zamengo, Henrique Borges;Gaglioti, André Luiz;Pederneiras, Leandro Cardoso			
03C7246A7930FFEDBFEDFF49FC351D5A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10080554/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10080554	FIGURE 2. Illustration of Celtis flumeniana Zamengo.—A. Fruit branch. B. Adult leaf. C. Domatia. E. Staminate flower. F. Pistillate flower. G. Drupe. H. Pyrene. Illustrator Klei Sousa.	FIGURE 2. Illustration of Celtis flumeniana Zamengo.—A. Fruit branch. B. Adult leaf. C. Domatia. E. Staminate flower. F. Pistillate flower. G. Drupe. H. Pyrene. Illustrator Klei Sousa.	2023-10-19	Zamengo, Henrique Borges;Gaglioti, André Luiz;Pederneiras, Leandro Cardoso		Zenodo	biologists	Zamengo, Henrique Borges;Gaglioti, André Luiz;Pederneiras, Leandro Cardoso			
03C7246A7930FFEDBFEDFF49FC351D5A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10080556/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10080556	FIGURE 3. Holotype of Celtis flumeniana Zamengo.	FIGURE 3. Holotype of Celtis flumeniana Zamengo.	2023-10-19	Zamengo, Henrique Borges;Gaglioti, André Luiz;Pederneiras, Leandro Cardoso		Zenodo	biologists	Zamengo, Henrique Borges;Gaglioti, André Luiz;Pederneiras, Leandro Cardoso			
03C7246A7930FFEDBFEDFF49FC351D5A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10080558/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10080558	FIGURE 4. Distribution map and areas of occurrence of Celtis flumeniana Zamengo.—A. Distribution map, Brazilian states, Goiás (GO), Maranh„o (MA), Mato Grosso (MT), Pará (PA), and Tocantins (TO). B. Banks of the Paran„ River. C. Paran„ River. D. Collection on the banks of the Paran„ River.	FIGURE 4. Distribution map and areas of occurrence of Celtis flumeniana Zamengo.—A. Distribution map, Brazilian states, Goiás (GO), Maranh„o (MA), Mato Grosso (MT), Pará (PA), and Tocantins (TO). B. Banks of the Paran„ River. C. Paran„ River. D. Collection on the banks of the Paran„ River.	2023-10-19	Zamengo, Henrique Borges;Gaglioti, André Luiz;Pederneiras, Leandro Cardoso		Zenodo	biologists	Zamengo, Henrique Borges;Gaglioti, André Luiz;Pederneiras, Leandro Cardoso			
03C7246A7930FFEDBFEDFF49FC351D5A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10080560/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10080560	FIGURE 5. Morphological differences between C. alnifolia, C. chichape, C. flumeniana, and C. iguanaea.—A: C. alnifolia, trunk.; B: C. chichape, trunk.; C: C. flumeniana, trunk.; D: C. iguanaea, trunk.; E: C. alnifolia, staminate flower.; F: C. chichape, staminate flower.; G: C. flumeniana, staminate flower.; H: C. iguanaea, staminate flower.; I: C. alnifolia, pistillate flower.; J: C. chichape, pistillate flower.; K: C. flumeniana, pistillate flower.; L: C. iguanaea, pistillate flower.; M: C. alnifolia, mature drupe.; N: C. chichape, mature drupe.; O: C. flumeniana, mature drupe.; P: C. iguanaea, mature drupe.; Q: C. alnifolia, pyrene.; Q1: C. alnifolia, arrow pointing to the apiculum scar.; R: C. chichape, pyrene.; S: C. flumeniana, pyrene.; S1: C. flumeniana, arrow pointing to the apiculum scar.; T: C. iguanaea, pyrene. T1: C. iguanaea, arrow pointing to the apiculum scar.	FIGURE 5. Morphological differences between C. alnifolia, C. chichape, C. flumeniana, and C. iguanaea.—A: C. alnifolia, trunk.; B: C. chichape, trunk.; C: C. flumeniana, trunk.; D: C. iguanaea, trunk.; E: C. alnifolia, staminate flower.; F: C. chichape, staminate flower.; G: C. flumeniana, staminate flower.; H: C. iguanaea, staminate flower.; I: C. alnifolia, pistillate flower.; J: C. chichape, pistillate flower.; K: C. flumeniana, pistillate flower.; L: C. iguanaea, pistillate flower.; M: C. alnifolia, mature drupe.; N: C. chichape, mature drupe.; O: C. flumeniana, mature drupe.; P: C. iguanaea, mature drupe.; Q: C. alnifolia, pyrene.; Q1: C. alnifolia, arrow pointing to the apiculum scar.; R: C. chichape, pyrene.; S: C. flumeniana, pyrene.; S1: C. flumeniana, arrow pointing to the apiculum scar.; T: C. iguanaea, pyrene. T1: C. iguanaea, arrow pointing to the apiculum scar.	2023-10-19	Zamengo, Henrique Borges;Gaglioti, André Luiz;Pederneiras, Leandro Cardoso		Zenodo	biologists	Zamengo, Henrique Borges;Gaglioti, André Luiz;Pederneiras, Leandro Cardoso			
