identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
8F4E96174148DF0EDEE94FEEFC1E44CA.text	8F4E96174148DF0EDEE94FEEFC1E44CA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Carpinus mollis Rehder 1930	<div><p>Carpinus mollis Rehder (1930: 154).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan [Szechuan]: Songpan Xian [Sungpan Hsien], 17 August 1928, W. P. Fang 4245 (holotype A00033760; isotypes CQNM0002710, E00275495, E00275496, E00275497, IBSC0001134, K000859923, NAS00070300, NY00253865, P01903243, PE00021928, PE00021929).</p> <p>≡ Carpinus cordata var. mollis (Rehder) W.C.Cheng ex Y.Chen (1937: 163).</p> <p>Note:— Carpinus mollis was published by Rehder (1930) based on the collection W.P. Fang 4245 from Sichuan. Chen (1937) listed the name C. cordata var. mollis (Rehd.) Cheng in his book but did not cite its basionym. In the appendix, Chen (1937) clearly stated that “Rehd.” represents for Alfred Rehder and “Cheng” for W.C.Cheng [Ṇ万n'].According to Art. 41.3 of International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (Shenzhen Code, Turland et al. 2018), it implied that Chen (1937) validated the name by indirectly referencing to its basionym Carpinus mollis Rehder (1930: 154). Under Art 46.7, the name C. cordata var. mollis is to be attributed to “(Rehder) W.C.Cheng ex Y.Chen”, but not “(Rehder) W.C. Cheng” only, since Yung Chen [Ŕẃ], whose abbreviation is “Y. Chen” recommended by IPNI, is the author of the publication. It is surprised that it was erroneously cited as either “(Rehder) W.C.Cheng ex Chun” (Li &amp; Skvortsov 1999), or “(Rehder) W.C.Cheng ex F.H.Chen” (IPNI 2021).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174148DF0EDEE94FEEFC1E44CA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E96174148DF0DDEE94A4AFE09404B.text	8F4E96174148DF0DDEE94A4AFE09404B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lepistemon glaber Handel-Mazzetti 1934	<div><p>Lepistemon glaber Handel-Mazzetti (1934: 7).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Guangxi [Kwangsi]: Baise [Poseh], (?Napo Xian), Baisheng Town [Bako Sha], elev. ca. 360 m, 11 September 1928, R. C. Ching 7344 (lectotype designated here, PE00029558; isolectotypes A00054665, CQNM0020751, IBSC0004740, NAS00072342, NAS00211192).</p> <p>= Merremia hederacea (N.L.Burman 1768: 77) H.Hallier (1893: 118).</p> <p>Note: —In the protologue, Handel-Mazzetti (1934) cited a single gathering R. C. Ching 7344, but he did not specify the herbarium where the type specimen is deposited. In searching for the type material in various herbaria, six duplicates were traced from A (00054665), CQNM (0020751), IBSC (0004740), NAS (00072342), NAS (00211192) and PE (00029558). All of them are syntypes since no holotype was designated under Art. 9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). Both the duplicates at A and PE bear the field label of “Herbarium of the Metropolitan Museum of Natural History, Academia Sinica, Nanking, China ”, which was the original title of Ching’s collection in 1928. The duplicate PE00029558 bears additional typewritten annotation “ Lepistemon chingianus Hand. -Mzt., sp. nov.” determined by Handel-Mazzetti in 1933 and seal of “type” while others stamped “isotype”. Furthermore, it is the only one bearing the identification label implying that Handel-Mazzetti has seen it before the name published. It is presumed that Handel-Mazzetti changed the specific epithet to “ glabra ” when he published the species. Therefore, the duplicate PE00029558 is here chosen as lectotype for the name.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174148DF0DDEE94A4AFE09404B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414BDF0DDEE94DCFFDA343E8.text	8F4E9617414BDF0DDEE94DCFFDA343E8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cupressus chengiana S. Y. Hu 1964	<div><p>Cupressus chengiana S.Y.Hu (1964: 57).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan [Szechuan]: N. W. Wenchuan Xian, 2 November 1930, W. C. Cheng 2066 (holotype A00022476; isotypes BM000546887, CAS0213752, IBSC0015839, PE00013191, PE00013349, SYS00001484, US 00012089). One paratype in CQNM: CHINA. Sichuan: East Li Xian [Li-fan Hsien], 10 July 1930, F. T. Wang 21700 (CQNM 0017389, KUN0133945, LBG00059897, NAS00163441, PE00002532).</p> <p>Note:— In the protologue, Hu (1964) also cited other two paratypes collected from Maoxian [Mao-chou] (Wilson 2105) and Wenchuan (Wilson 798a).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414BDF0DDEE94DCFFDA343E8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414BDF0DDEE94EA8FC3245D6.text	8F4E9617414BDF0DDEE94EA8FC3245D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fagus chienii W. C. Cheng 1935	<div><p>Fagus chienii W.C.Cheng (1935: 70).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan [Szechuan]: W. Pingwu Xian [Pingwu hsien], elev. ca. 1300 m, 17 August 1931, W. C. Cheng 2903 (lectotype designated here, NAS00070338; isolectotypes A00033870, CQNM0017387, E00098603, IBSC0001170, K000832761, MICH1109337, NAS00070339, NY00248568, PE00022177, PE00022178, PE00022179, PE00022180, PE00022181, PE00022182, PE00022180, SYS00054972, US 00409518).</p> <p>Note:—In the protologue, Cheng indicated W. C. Cheng 2903 as the type, but he did not specify the herbarium where the type is deposited. In searching in various herbaria, 18 duplicates were traced and all of them are syntypes since no holotype was designated under Art. 9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). Most duplicates bear cupules and the identification annotation of W. C. Cheng and are well preserved. NAS00070338 is designated here as the lectotype for the reason Cheng used to work in NAS. In the protologue, Cheng (1935) stated the locality of the type at a place near “Yao-erpa” in West of Pingwu Xian; however, none of the duplicates with a label bearing this locality, and it is also uncertain whether “Pingwuhsien” means the present Pingwu Town. For efforts to trace this type locality has not been successful, the identity of this tree species is still uncertain (e.g. Huang et al. 1999).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414BDF0DDEE94EA8FC3245D6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414BDF0DDEE948BDFE7A4498.text	8F4E9617414BDF0DDEE948BDFE7A4498.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fagus tientaiensis Liou 1935	<div><p>Fagus tientaiensis Liou (1935: 451).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Zhejiang [Chekiang]: Tian Tai shan [Tientai Shan], Fang Guang Si, elev. ca. 400 m, 8 August 1934, S. Chen 3718 (holotype PE00022196; isotypes A00033879, CQNM0017378, PE00022197, PE00934493, SYS00054947).</p> <p>= Fagus longipetiolata Seemen (1897: 56).</p> <p>Note:—The sheet PE00022196 corresponds the image in the protologue (Liu 1935), it is therefore the holotype, and the duplicates in other herbaria are all isotypes. The locality Fang Guang Si (Ẇ 广寺) is identical in the field label of the duplicates at CQNM and PE.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414BDF0DDEE948BDFE7A4498	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414BDF0DDEE94A3FFF53496B.text	8F4E9617414BDF0DDEE94A3FFF53496B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrangea kwangsiensis Hu 1931	<div><p>Hydrangea kwangsiensis Hu (1931:152).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Guangxi [Kwangsi]: Luocheng County [Luchen], Du Feng Shan [Chu Feng Shan], 15 km SW Sanfang [Shan Fang], ca. 850 m, 8 June 1928, R. C. Ching 5836 (PE 00029330, lectotype designated by McClintock 1957; isolectotypes A00042807, CQNM0005387, IBSC0004344, NAS00071069, NAS00071070, NY00186286, PE00029330).</p> <p>Note: —In the protologue, Hu (1931) cited the type as “ R. C. Ching, Kwangsi Exped. Metrop. Mus. Of Nat. His. Acad. Sin. no. 5386 ”, of which “Exped. Metrop. Mus. Of Nat. His. Acad. Sin.” is the abbreviation of name of the project by which Ching’s field work was supported. As pointed out by Chun (1954), the field number 5836 was mistyped as 5386 in the protologue. Hu (1931) did not specify the herbarium where the type specimen is deposited, eight traced specimens above are syntypes under Art.9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). McClintock (1957) cited a photograph of PE00029330 deposited at A and NY, and indicated this specimen to be holotype. This was achieved to designate a lectotype for the name and the term “ holotype ” is correctable to be “ lectotype ” according to Art. 9.10 (Turland et al. 2018).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414BDF0DDEE94A3FFF53496B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE94855FB9645C9.text	8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE94855FB9645C9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Actinodaphne lancifolia var. sinensis C. K. Allen 1938	<div><p>Actinodaphne lancifolia var. sinensis C.K.Allen (1938: 406).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Zhejiang [Chekiang]: 19 September 1933, S. Chen 2156 (holotype A 00041096; isotypes PE00434916, SYS00008174); Paratypes in CQNM: CHINA. Zhejiang [Chekiang]: Tian Mu Shan, 27 Jun 1932, W. C. Cheng 2146 (CQNM0004259, IBSC0000238, PE00434919, SYS00008158); without locality, 12 October 1933, S. Chen 2415 (CQNM0015782, PE00434918, SYS00008050).</p> <p>≡ Litsea coreana var. sinensis (C.K.Allen) Yen C.Yang &amp; P.H.Huang in Yang et al. (1978: 49).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE94855FB9645C9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE9488EFCBF475A.text	8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE9488EFCBF475A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cinnamomum trinervatum Yen C. Yang 1945	<div><p>Cinnamomum trinervatum Yen C. Yang (1945: 72).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Chongqing [Szechuan]: Xiushan Xian [Siu-shan-hsien], Yun’ai [Yuehhih], 24 October 1933, T. H. Tu [typo as “ T. T. Tu ”] 4099 (lectotype designated here, PE00294274; isolectotypes CQNM0017385, IBK00004618, IBK00004619, IBK00190160,? IBSC0046966,? IBSC0046970).</p> <p>= Cinnamomum appelianum Schewe in Handel-Mazzetti (1925: 20).</p> <p>Note: —In the protologue, Yang (1945) cited a single gathering but he did not specify the herbarium where the specimens are deposited. Seven duplicates were traced from CQNM (0017385), IBK (00004618, 00004619, 00190160), IBSC (0046966, 0046970) and PE (00294274) and all are syntypes since no holotype was designated according to Art. 9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). Here the duplicate at PE (00294274) is designated as lectotype because it bears the original field notes and has relative complete branches and infructescences.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE9488EFCBF475A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE94A31FF66468A.text	8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE94A31FF66468A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lindera gambleana C. K. Allen 1941	<div><p>Lindera gambleana C.K.Allen (1941: 27).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan [Szechuan]: Mt. Emei, Xi Xiang Chi, elev. ca. 2400 m, 22 April 1932, T. T. Yü 495 (holotype A00041605; isotypes CQNM0015720, CQNM0015721, IBSC0000192, PE 00281221, PE00281485, PE00699178). Paratypes in CQNM: CHINA. Sichuan: Mt. Emei, Xi Xiang Chi, elev. ca. 2400 m, 22 April 1932, T. T. Yü 494 (?A, CQNM0015722, CQNM0017386, IBSC0000191, PE00281459); Mt. Emei, 2 July 1931, F. T. Wang 23152 (CQNM0004517, IBSC0000193, KUN0106435, NAS00070841, NAS00070851, PE00281343, WUK0043791, WUK0043794); 18 April 1932, T. T. Yü 384 (CQNM0004514, PE00281460), 21 April 1932, T. T. Yü 487 (CQNM0004513, IBSC0051079, PE00281458).</p> <p>= Lindera pulcherrima var. hemsleyana (Diels 1901: 352) H.P.Tsui in Yang et al. (1978: 67).</p> <p>Note: — In the protologue, Allen (1941) designated T. T. Yü 495 at A as the type and simultaneously cited other Yu’s gatherings from Mt Emei and other four gatherings as the paratypes. The duplicated of all Yu’s collection are found at CQNM.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE94A31FF66468A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE94F51FD9942E9.text	8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE94F51FD9942E9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Phlomis wangii Hu & H. T. Tsai 1931	<div><p>Phlomis wangii Hu &amp; H.T.Tsai (1931: 261).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan [Szechuan]: Xiaojin [Mao-kung Hsien], Guan Zhai [Kuan-tzai], elev. 3000–3100 m., 13 June 1930, F. T. Wang 21305 (holotype PE00835513; isotypes CQNM0015717, NAS00072443, PE00835514, PE00835521).</p> <p>= Phlomis medicinalis Diels (1900: 554).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE94F51FD9942E9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE94CBDFF5643E2.text	8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE94CBDFF5643E2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rhoiptelea chiliantha Diels & Hand.	<div><p>Rhoiptelea chiliantha Diels &amp; Hand.- Mazz. in Handel-Mazzetti (1932a: 77).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Guizhou [Kweichow]: Dushan [Tuhshan],? Bazhai [Pachai], elev. ca. 600 m, 22 August 1930, Y. Tsiang 6568 (holotype W, not traced; isotypes A00034339, E00502160, IBSC0419598, PE00023066, PE00023067, US00089742). Paratypes in CQNM: CHINA. Guangxi [Kwangsi]: Luocheng [Luchen], Du Feng Shan [Chu Feng Shan], 15 km southwest of Sanfang [Shan Fang], 8 June 1928, R. C. Ching 5840 (CQNM0002475, CQNM0002476, IBSC0419564, PE00023068, PE00023069).</p> <p>Note:—No original field notes is attached on the duplicates of R. C. Ching 5840 at CQNM, but the collecting date on the label was erroneously written as ‘ September 1928 ’. However, it is stated on the duplicate at PE (PE00023068) that the gathering R. C. Ching 5840 was collected from Sanfang Town, Luocheng County. Another paratype, R. C. Ching 7504 (only one sheet found, PE00023069) may be collected from the west of Baise [Poseh], and the other three gatherings (Petelot 3590, Fenzel 43 and Tsiang 6700) cited in the protologue (Handel-Mazzetti 1932a) could not be traced.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414ADF0CDEE94CBDFF5643E2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414DDF0BDEE94CCBFAB5432F.text	8F4E9617414DDF0BDEE94CCBFAB5432F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Litsea auriculata S. S. Chien & W. C. Cheng 1931	<div><p>Litsea auriculata S.S.Chien &amp; W.C.Cheng (1931: 59).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Zhejiang [Chekiang]: Western Tian Mu Shan [W. Tien-mushan], elev. ca. 1100 m, 8 August 1929, S. S. Chien 601 (PE00028512, lectotype designated by Lin et al. 2016; isolectotypes A00041694, CQNM0015781, K000793089, NF2000700, NAS00070861, PE00028938, PE00434507). Remaining syntypes: CHINA. Zhejiang: Western Tian Mu Shan, elev. 800–1200 m, 17 April 1931, W. C. Cheng 2348 (A00041692, CQNM0015783, IBSC000227, K000793088, NF2000695, NY00355220, PE00028503, PE00028504, PE00028505, PE00028506) and W. C. Cheng 2349 (A00041693, CQNM0015784, IBSC0000229, K000793087, LBG00072037, NAS00070859, NAS00070860, NF2000694, NY00355221, PE00028508, PE00028509, PE00028510, PE00028511).</p> <p>Note:— In the protologue, Chien &amp; Cheng (1931) designated S.S. Chien 601 (fruiting), W.C. Cheng 2348 (pistillate) and W.C. Cheng 2349 (staminate) deposited at the herbarium of Biological Laboratory of the Science Society of China as the type, and all of them are syntypes according to Art.9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). Lin et al. (2016) designated PE00028512 as the lectotype. The available isolectotypes and remaining syntypes are traced at the above listed herbaria.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414DDF0BDEE94CCBFAB5432F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414DDF0BDEE94E20FF664530.text	8F4E9617414DDF0BDEE94E20FF664530.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Litsea chunii var. longipedicellata Yen C. Yang 1945	<div><p>Litsea chunii var. longipedicellata Yen C. Yang (1945: 78).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan [Sikang]: Kangding [Kangting-hsien], near Lama Gou [Lama-kou], 27 August 1939, Y. C. Yang 3798 (lectotype designated here, PE00028954; isolectotypes NAS00070870, PE00028953). Paratypes in CQNM: CHINA. Sichuan: Kangding, no precise locality, 11 August 1931, T. H. Tu 1890 (CQNM0015785,? IBSC,? KUN); Baoxing Xian [Pao-hsing-hsien], Shizi Shan [Shih-tze-shan], elev. ca. 2500 m, 16 July 1933, T. T. Yü 2378 (CQNM0015786, IBSC0056267, IBSC0056268, IBSC0056326, PE00028952, PE00700687); Ebian Xian [Opien-hsien], 26 August 1939, S. L. Sun 1099 (CQNM0015787, KUN0107271, TIE00010142).</p> <p>= Litsea chunii W.C.Cheng (1934: 196).</p> <p>Note:— In the protologue, Yang (1945) designated Y. C. Yang 3798 as the type, but he did not specify the herbarium where the type is deposited. Three duplicates at NAS (00070870) and PE (00028953, 00028954) were traced, and all of them are syntypes according to Art.9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). All of them have the handwritten of Yang and annotation of “type”. The duplicate PE00028954, which Lin &amp; Yang (2016) stated as “ holotype ”, is designated as the lectotype due to its good condition. Yang also cited five gatherings as the paratypes, of which, three specimens are found at CQNM.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414DDF0BDEE94E20FF664530	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414DDF0BDEE948C4FA8B475C.text	8F4E9617414DDF0BDEE948C4FA8B475C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Litsea szechuanica C. K. Allen 1941	<div><p>Litsea szechuanica C.K.Allen (1941: 18).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan [Szechuan]: Dujiangyang [Kuan Hsien], Qingcheng Shan [Chien- Cheng Shan], elev. ca. 1000 m, 4 April 1938, C. S. Fan &amp; Class 139 (holotype A00041741). Paratypes in CQNM: CHINA. Sichuan: Emei Shan [Mt. Omei], Fuhu temple, 15 April 1932, T. T. Yü 282 (CQNM0015776, CQNM0015777); 19 April 1932, T. T. Yü 418 (CQNM0015778, CQNM0004227, IBK00007707, IBSC0060684, PE00028982).</p> <p>≡ Litsea moupinensis var. szechuanica (C.K.Allen) Yen C.Yang &amp; P.H.Huang in Yang et al. (1978: 47).</p> <p>Note: —When describing Litsea szechuanica, Allen (1941) cited 14 gatherings collected from Shaanxi, Sichuan and Yunnan as paratypes. When reducing it to a variety of L. moupinensis, Yang &amp; al. (1978) excluded the gathering G. Fenzel 507 from Shaanxi on which they described the new species Litsea tsinlingensis Yen C.Yang &amp; P.H.Huang in Yang et al. (1978: 46), and noted that H. T. Tsai 55967 from Yunnan was misidentified for Lindera communis Hemsl. in Forbes &amp; Hemsley (1891: 387). Yang et al. (1978) also stated that the gathering T. T. Yü 705 from Emei Shan is Litsea veitchiana Gamble in Sargent (1914: 76), and F. T. Wang 23151 is L. moupinensis Lecomte (1913: 84).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414DDF0BDEE948C4FA8B475C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414DDF0BDEE94A30FB204947.text	8F4E9617414DDF0BDEE94A30FB204947.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Litsea wenshanensis Hu 1934	<div><p>Litsea wenshanensis Hu (1934: 308).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Yunnan: Wenshan, elev. ca. 2100 m., 10 February 1933, H. T. Tsai 51726 (holotype PE00028996; isotypes A00041747, IBSC0000252, NY00355236, PE00028991). One paratype in CQNM: CHINA. Yunnan: Wenshan, elev.ca. 1800 m, 22 January 1933, H. T. Tsai 51616 (CQNM0004567, IBSC0000253, KUN0109511, PE00028992).</p> <p>= Litsea honghoensis H. Liu (1933: 567).</p> <p>Note: — Hu (1934) cited four gatherings of H. T. Tsai from Wenshan, SE Yunnan, with designating H. T. Tsai 51726 as type, but he did not specify the herbarium where the type is deposited. Five duplicates were traced from herbaria A (00041747), IBSC (0000252), NY(00355236) and PE(00028991, 00028996), and amongst, duplicate PE00028996 bears a label annotated by Hu’s handwritten with a line drawing and stamped as “type”. This duplicate may be the sole specimen used by Hu when he prepared the protologue for the name and may be considered as holotype according to Art. 9.1 (Turland et al. 2018). In CQNM, one duplicate of the paratype H. T. Tsai 51616 is found. This collection was collected on 22 January 1933, but, in the protologue, it was confused by Hu (1934) with H. T. Tai 51555 (IBSC0058673, IBSC0058674, KUN0109509, LBG00078798, NAS00070909, PE00028995, WUK0039914).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414DDF0BDEE94A30FB204947	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE94B43FB214968.text	8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE94B43FB214968.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ficus pumila var. ellipsoidea W. C. Cheng	<div><p>Ficus pumila var. ellipsoidea W.C.Cheng in Cheng &amp; Chien (1934: 254).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Zhejiang [Chekiang]: Pingyang, Nan Yan Dang, Xian Gu Dong, 15 July 1934, S. Chen 3564 (PE00023071, lectotype designated by Lin et al. 2008a; isolectotypes IBSC0373559, NAS00070407, PE00023071, PE00734086). One of the remaining syntypes: CHINA. Zhejiang: Pingyang, 4 August 1932, Y. Y. Ho 1528 (CQNM0001154, NAS00070406, PE00023070, PE00734085).</p> <p>Note: —This variety was neglected in the account of Ficus in Chinese floras (e.g. Chang et al. 1998, Zhou &amp; Gilbert 2003), and Lin et al (2008a) did not mention its identity either when lectotypifying this name.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE94B43FB214968	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE9493CFC2C47F0.text	8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE9493CFC2C47F0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Kmeria septentrionalis Dandy 1931	<div><p>Kmeria septentrionalis Dandy (1931: 233).</p> <p>Type: CHINA. Guangxi [Kwangsi]: Luocheng Xian [Luchen], [Tang Giar Poo], elev. ca. 300 m, 23 May 1928, R. C. Ching 5247 (BM000574771, lectotype designated by Chen &amp; Nooteboom 1993; isolectotypes, CQNM0015718, IBSC0014013, NAS00040740, NAS 00040741, NY00320681, PE00028324, SYS00050450, SYS00050449).</p> <p>≡ Woonyoungia septentrionalis (Dandy) Y.W.Law (1997: 356).</p> <p>Note:— In the protologue, Dandy (1931) indicated R. C. Ching 5247 in “Herb. Brit. Mus.; Herb. New York Bot. Gard.” as the types and both are syntypes under Art. 9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). When they indicated the only duplicate at BM as the holotype, Chen &amp; Nooteboom (1993) achieved to designate a lectotype for the name and the usage of term “ holotype ” by them is a correctable error to “ lectotype ” under Art. 9.10.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE9493CFC2C47F0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE94CCBFDFC43BC.text	8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE94CCBFDFC43BC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Machilus pingii W. C. Cheng ex Yen C. Yang 1945	<div><p>Machilus pingii W.C.Cheng ex Yen C. Yang (1945: 76).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Chongqing [Szechuan], Beibei District [Pa-hsien, Peipei], Jinyun Shan [Tsin-yun-shan], 6 April 1939, C. Pei 7092 (lectotype designated here, NAS00070923; isolectotypes NAS00070925, PE00029013). Remaining syntypes: CHINA. Sichuan [Sikang]: Ya-an, near Ma Liu Chang [Ma-kiou-Chang], 6 August 1939, Y. C. Yang 3423 (NAS00070924, PE00935898). Paratypes in CQNM: CHINA. Sichuan: Emei Shan, elev. ca. 400 m, 3 April 1940, W. P. Fang 13984 (CQNM0015775, IBK00009356, KUN0172559, PE00618771, SZ00163694) &amp; W. P. Fang 13985 (CQNM0015779, KUN0172561, PE00618792, SZ00163689); Sichuan: without locality, 1930, T. Tang [or F. T. Wang] 23124 (CQNM0015780, IBSC0062447, KUN0172569, PE00029016, SZ).</p> <p>= Machilus nanmu (Oliver 1880: 10) Hemsl. in Forbes &amp; Hemsley (1891: 376).</p> <p>Note: —In the protologue, Yang (1945) designated C. Pei 7092 and Y. C. Yang 3423 as flowering and fruiting types, respectively, and both are syntypes according to Art. 9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). Three duplicates (NAS00070923, NAS00070925, PE00029013) of C. Pei 7092 and two duplicates (NAS00070924, PE 00935898) were traced. Among of them, two duplicates (NAS00070923,NAS00070924) bear the annotation of Yang’s handwritten. Here, the duplicate NAS00070923 is here chosen as the lectotype because of better condition. Among of the paratypes cited by Yang, the two gatherings W. P. Fang 19834 &amp; 13985 collected from Mt. Emei are traced, and Fang 13985 was erroneously cited as ‘19985’ in the protologue by Yang (1945).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE94CCBFDFC43BC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE94F57FCF8429F.text	8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE94F57FCF8429F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neolitsea aurata var. glauca Yen C. Yang 1945	<div><p>Neolitsea aurata var. glauca Yen C. Yang (1945: 80).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Chongqing [Szechuan]: Beibei [Pa-hsien, Pehpei], Mt. Jinyun [Tsinyun-shan], 24 February 1939, Y. Z. Sun 1434 (PE0029037, lectotype designated by Lin et al. 2016; isolectotypes CQNM0020749, NAS00070935).</p> <p>Note: —In the protologue, Yang (1945) designated three gatherings Y. Z. Sun 1434, C. W. Yao 3438 and Y. C. Yang 3267 as types of male flower, female flower and immature fruit type respectively. Lin at al. (2016) chose one duplicate of Y. Z. Sun 1434 (PE0029037) with male inflorescence as the lectotype.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE94F57FCF8429F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE94877FAD14580.text	8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE94877FAD14580.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neolitsea chekiangensis Nakai 1940	<div><p>Neolitsea chekiangensis Nakai (1940: 128).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Zhejiang [Chekiang]: Longquan [Lung-chüan], 6 October 1932, Y. Y. Ho 1626 (holotype TI, not traced; isotypes CQNM0004289, PE00029041, SYS00009173).</p> <p>≡ Neolitsea aurata var. chekiangensis (Nakai)Yen C.Yang &amp; P.H.Huang in Yang et al. (1978: 39).</p> <p>Note: —In the protologue, the collecting date of Y. Y. Ho 1626 was written by Nakai (1940) as 6 October 1922, however, it is clearly stated on the duplicates at CQNM, PE and SYS that it was collected on 6 October 1932.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414CDF0ADEE94877FAD14580	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414FDF09DEE94CBDFB774396.text	8F4E9617414FDF09DEE94CBDFB774396.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diplopanax stachyanthus Handel-Mazzetti 1933	<div><p>Diplopanax stachyanthus Handel-Mazzetti (1933: 198).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Guangxi [Kwangsi]: Luocheng Xian [Luchen], [Bin Long, Min Shan], elev. ca. 1200 m, 14 June 1928, R. C. Ching 5969 (lectotype designated here, NAS00071983; isolectotypes A00075389, CQNM0015719, NAS00071984, NY00169046, PE01432769).</p> <p>Note:— In the protologue, Handel-Mazzetti (1933) cited a single gathering R. C. Ching 5969 as the type, but he did not specify the herbarium where the type specimen is deposited. Li (1942) indicated that isotypes are deposited at LU (now in SYS) and NY, but he did not indicate the herbarium where the holotype is deposited. Because he did not accept any specimen as the lectotype using the term “type” or holotype or its equivalent, Li did not achieve to designate a lectotype for the name. In search of the duplicates in various herbaria, six duplicates were traced at A, CQNM, NAS, NY and PE. The Ching’s investigation to Guangxi 1928 was supported by the Herbarium of the Metropolitan Museum of Natural History, Nanking, China and labeled as such. Among of traced duplicates, two duplicates at NAS bear typewritten identification label and it is indicated that they were identified by Handel-Mazzetti. The duplicates at PE and NY do not bear the original identification label of Handel-Mazzetti. The duplicate at A was transferred for LU in 1954. Therefore, the duplicate NAS00071983 is designated here as the lectotype due to its better condition. The duplicate at LU might be transferred to SYS (Thiers 2021), but it is not traced by the present authors.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414FDF09DEE94CBDFB774396	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414FDF09DEE94F26FE6A4616.text	8F4E9617414FDF09DEE94F26FE6A4616.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ligustrum purpurascens Yen C. Yang 1939	<div><p>Ligustrum purpurascens Yen C. Yang (1939: 112).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan [Szechuan]: Dujiangyan [Kuan-hsien], elev. 900–1100 m, 4 July 1928, W. P. Fang 1986 (lectotype first-step by Green 1995, second-step designated here, NAS00072233; isolectotypes IBSC0513407, K000449355, NAS00072234, P00640724, PE01509633). Remaining syntypes: CHINA. Sichuan: Mt. Emei [Omei], elev. 450–600 m, 2 August 1928, W. P. Fang 2348 PE01509634, PE01509663). Paratypes in CQNM: CHINA. Sichuan: Mt. Emei, elev. ca. 960, 3 June 1931, Ching &amp; Shun 28 (CQNM0015758, PE01509642, PE01509651), elev. 1170 m, 12 June 1935, T. H. Tu 270 (CQNM0015730, IBK00094390, IBK00094391, IBK00094392, IBK00094393, IBSC0513433, NAS00069260, PE01509655, PE01509657, PE01509724, PE01509725,), elev. ca. 1600 m, 9 September 1935, T. H. Tu 798 (CQNM0017383, IBK00294049, IBSC0513435, PE01509652, PE01509653, PE01509676); Mt. Emei, 1931, T. Tang [or F. T. Wang] 23193 (CQNM0015731, WUK0048172, IBSC0513397, IBSC0513414, LBG00106364, KUN0062230, PE01509627, PE01509628), 1931, Wang &amp; Tu 404b (CQNM0015729).</p> <p>= Ligustrum robustum subsp. chinense P.S.Green (1995: 385).</p> <p>Note:—In the protologue, Yang (1939) indictated two gatherings, W. P. Fang 1986 and W. P. Fang 2348, as the types, and both are thus syntypes according to Art.9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). Green (1995) cited W.P. Fang 1986 as the type, and indicated the duplicate at K as “isotype”, but he did not mention which one is the “ holotype ”. Therefore, Green (1995) has achieved to first-step lectotypification for the name by the gathering W.P. Fang 1986. Five duplicates of W. P. Fang 1986 were traced from four herbaria above, and two sheets (NAS00072233, NAS00072234) bear the labels with Yang’s handwritten. The duplicate NAS00072233 is designated as second-step lectotypification for the name because of its better condition and annotated by its original author Yang. It should be noticed that Lin (2009) overlooked the Green’s choice and selected W.P. Fang 2348 at PE as the lectotype, According to Art. 9. 19, Green’s choice must be followed and Lin’s choice should be therefore superseded. Yang (1939) also cited nine gatherings as paratypes, and five of which are found at CQNM. By comparing the available duplicates in different herbaria, we found quite a lot of type errors on the information of paratypes. The gathering cited as “ T. H. Tu 270 ” should be corrected to Ching &amp; Shun 28, collected on 3 June 1931 rather than 8 June 1931, while another gathering cited as “ T. H. Tu 270 (?) ” is T. H. Tu 270 collected on 12 June 1935. “ T. H. Tu 398 ” should be corrected to T. H. Tu 798. On most duplicates in the herbaria other than CQNM, the gathering “ T. Tang 23193 ” bears the label with the collector “F. T. Wang” and collected on 4 July 1931 from Mt. Emei although the tied tag with the reading “Szechuan Exp., T. Tang, 1930”. However, only the duplicate CQNM0015731 has the label with the name “ Ligustrum purpurascens Yang, sp. nov. ” annotated by Y. C. Yang (Yen Chin Yang) in 1930.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414FDF09DEE94F26FE6A4616	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414FDF08DEE94BA6FC9D4097.text	8F4E9617414FDF08DEE94BA6FC9D4097.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Maesa argentea var. kwangsiensis Handel-Mazzetti 1934	<div><p>Maesa argentea var. kwangsiensis Handel-Mazzetti (1934: 4).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Guangxi [Kwangsi]:? Donglan Xian [Tang-lan], elev. ca. 550 m, 23 July 1928, R. C. Ching6542 (W, lectotype designated by Walker 1940; isolectotypes A00025482, CQNM0015761, IBSC0023132, IBSC0002692, IBSC0023132, NAS00072079, NAS00072080, PE00027723, US 00113661).</p> <p>= Maesa montana A.de Candolle (1844: 79).</p> <p>Note:—Handel-Mazzetti (1934) cited a single gathering R. C. Ching 6542, but he did not specify the herbarium where the type specimen is deposited. Nine duplicates were traced and they are syntypes since no holotype was indicated under Art. 9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). However, when revising the family Myrsinaceae from eastern Asia, Walker (1940) mentioned that the type was “probably in the Vienna Herbarium”. The duplicate US 00113661 bears actually a few fragments of fruits on the left and attaching a photo of a specimen marked “ex Vienna” on the right. On the top of the field label of this photo, there is handwriting of Handel-Mazzetti as “ Maesa argentea var. n. kwangsiensis Hand. -Mzt.” Walker (1940) inadvertently achieved the lectotypification.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414FDF08DEE94BA6FC9D4097	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414EDF08DEE94E20FDF342C7.text	8F4E9617414EDF08DEE94E20FDF342C7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Prunus edentata Handel-Mazzetti 1932	<div><p>Prunus edentata Handel-Mazzetti (1932b: 126).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Guangxi [Kwangsi]: Lingyun Xian [Lin-yen], [Yeo Mar Shan], elev. ca. 1450 m, 27 August 1928, R. C. Ching 7174 (lectotype designated here, NAS00358543; isolectotypes CQNM0015765, M0214796, NAS00071268, NY00429945).</p> <p>= Laurocerasus phaeosticta (Hance 1870: 72) C.K.Schneider (1906: 649).</p> <p>Note:—In the protologue, Handel-Mazzetti (1932b) cited a single gathering R. C. Ching 7174, but he did not specify the herbarium where the type is deposited. Five duplicates are traced and all are syntypes under Art. 9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). NAS00358543 is here selected as the lectotype for it with fruits attached in a paper bag and the typewritten annotation determined by Handel-Mazzetti.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414EDF08DEE94E20FDF342C7	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414EDF08DEE949DFFDC7463F.text	8F4E9617414EDF08DEE949DFFDC7463F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Smilax austrosinensis F. T. Wang & Tang 1934	<div><p>Smilax austrosinensis F.T. Wang &amp; Tang (1934: 423).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Chongqing [Szechuan]: Nanchuan, Mt. Jinfo [Chinfu Shan], elev. ca. 1800 m, 27 May 1928, W. P. Fang 1099 (holotype PE00035146; isotypes A00030078, PE00034188). A paratype in CQNM: CHINA. Sichuan: Mt. Emei, elev. ca. 1700 m, 7 July 1931, F. T. Wang 23243 (CQNM0006992, PE00432616).</p> <p>= Smilax lanceifolia var. elongata (Warb. in Diels 1900: 259) F.T.Wang &amp; Tang in Wang et al. (1978: 220).</p> <p>Note:— Wang &amp; Tang (1934) designated W. P. Fang 1099 as the type in the protologue without specifying the herbarium. For the above traced three duplicates of this gathering, only PE00035146 bears the handwriting annotation “ Smilax austrosinensis Wang et Tang, sp. nov. ” determined by Wang &amp; Tang in May 1934. It is inferred that it is the only specimen Wang &amp; Tang (1934) based when preparing the description of this name and it is the holotype, which is contrary to Lin &amp; Yang (2015a), who considered that PE00034188 is the holotype. Though it contains more complete morphological characters, PE00034188 has handwriting of different style for the annotation “ Smilax austrosinensis Wang et Tang ” and determined in October 1934 on a label printed as “EMENDANDA”, which means a letter handwriting annotation and this specimen should be an isotype.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414EDF08DEE949DFFDC7463F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414EDF08DEE94877FAA8447F.text	8F4E9617414EDF08DEE94877FAA8447F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Zanthoxylum bungeanum var. pubescens C. C. Huang 1957	<div><p>Zanthoxylum bungeanum var. pubescens C.C.Huang (1957: 24).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan [Szechuan]: Baoxing Xian [Pao-schen-hsien], Gang Yang Gou, elev. ca. 2200 m., 29 June 1933, T. T. Yü 2129 (holotype PE00022555; isotypes CQNM0017384, IBSC0389304, IBSC0389288, PE00723465).</p> <p>Note:—In the protologue, Huang (1957) designated the type at PE (in the protologue, the herbarium was abbreviated as P.), where two duplicates are found. Only PE00022555 has the annotation label determined by C. C. Huang (or C. J. Huang) in 1956. The isotype sheet at CQNM has the same label of collecting information as the holotype.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414EDF08DEE94877FAA8447F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E9617414EDF07DEE94B9FFDAD40FE.text	8F4E9617414EDF07DEE94B9FFDAD40FE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Salix neowilsonii W. P. Fang 1948	<div><p>Salix neowilsonii W.P.Fang (1948: 313).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan [Szechuan]: Chengdu [Chengtu], Jing Ju Si [Tsing Chu Ssu], 15 March 1945, W. P. Fang 19403 (holotype SZ00516909; isotype IBK00078135). One of the paratypes: CHINA. Sichuan: Chengdu, Wang Jiang Lou [Wang-Kiang-lau], 15 March 1947, W. P. Fang 19616 (CQNM0020750, SZ00051523).</p> <p>Note:—In the protologue (Fang 1948), W. P. Fang 19403 was designated as the type without specifying the herbarium. Two duplicates were traced at PE and SZ, only the duplicate at SZ (00516909) where W. P. Fang worked at that time bears the handwritten annotation determined by W. P. Fang. It may be single specimen used by Fang when he preparing the protologue for the name and might be therefore considered as the holotype according to Art. 9.1 (Turland et al. 2018). Both duplicates do not bear the information of the locality of “Tsing Chun Ssu” (probably Jing Ju Si in east of former Chengdu downtown). The gathering W. P. Fang 19616 is one of 27 paratypes cited in the protologue, another duplicate of which is deposited at SZ.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E9617414EDF07DEE94B9FFDAD40FE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E96174141DF07DEE94F26FD6845A2.text	8F4E96174141DF07DEE94F26FD6845A2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Acer sinopurpurascens W. C. Cheng	<div><p>Acer sinopurpurascens W.C.Cheng</p> <p>in Chien &amp; Cheng (1931: 62).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Zhejiang [Chekiang]: Western Tian Mu Shan [Tienmu-shan], elev. 1200–1300 m, 23 April 1931, W. C. Cheng 2424 (PE00023445, lectotype designated by Lin et al. 2009; isolectotypes A00245405, CQNM0015724, IBSC0002074, K000640863, NAS00071819, PE00023443, PE00023446, PE00023448). Remaining syntypes: CHINA. Zhejiang: Western Tianmushan, elev. ca. 845, 16 August 1929, S. S. Chien 845 (A00050488, CQNM0015723, NAS00071817, NAS00071818, NY00337718, PE00023444, K000640862); elev. 1200–1300 m, 23 April 1931, W. C. Cheng 2429 (A00245404, IBSC0002073, K000640864, LBG00076624, PE00023447).</p> <p>Note: —In the protologue, Chien &amp; Cheng (1931) designated three gatherings as types of flowering, staminate and pistillate, respectively. Lin et al. (2009) chose a duplicate of staminate at PE (00023445) as the lectotype. The isolectotypes and remaining syntypes are listed above.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174141DF07DEE94F26FD6845A2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E96174141DF07DEE948AAFB314662.text	8F4E96174141DF07DEE948AAFB314662.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Acer sycopseoides Chun	<div><p>Acer sycopseoides Chun (1932:t. 3160).</p> <p>Type.— China. Guangxi [Kwangsi]: Luocheng Xian [Lu-chen-hsien], [Tia-Lian-Shan], elev. ca. 540 m, 25 May 1928, R. C. Ching 5336 (IBSC0436401, lectotype designated by Fang 1939; isolectotypes A00050491, CQNM0000975, K000640908, NAS00071821, NAS00071822, NAS00071823, NAS00071824, NY00337719, PE00023451, PE00023452).</p> <p>Note:—In the protologue, Chun (1932) cited a single gathering but did not specify the herbarium where the specimens are deposited. Ten duplicates are traced in herbaria A, CQNM, IBSC, K, NAS, NY and PE as listed above, and all are syntypes according to Art. 9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). When Fang (1939) wrote “type in Suny.”, he achieved to designate the lectotype for the name. The specimen IBSC043641 was previously deposited at Suny. (Abbreviation of Sun Yatsen University) and later transferred to IBSC, which bears both the title of Sun Yatsen University (in Chinese) at lower right and handwritten annotation by W. Y. Chun. In the handwritten annotation, Chun annotated in 1930 as “ Acer sycopseoides Chun, sp. nov. (Changed from A. pachyphyllu Chun, mss). Fragments deposited at Kew”, which means the specimen IBSC043641 was not the only specimen that Chun (1932) based to describe the species, and it is reasonable to be the lectotype designated by Fang (1939). It is clearly noted in the protologue (Chun 1932) that the author of this name was Chun (W. Y. Chun), and this is also supported by annotation on the lectotype, but the authorship was wrongly ascribed to F.Chun (Faith Chun or Shuzhen Chen; e.g. Xu et al. 2008).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174141DF07DEE948AAFB314662	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E96174141DF06DEE94B6AFE3641B3.text	8F4E96174141DF06DEE94B6AFE3641B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Acer tetramerum fm. viridicarpum W. P. Fang 1932	<div><p>Acer tetramerum f. viridicarpum W.P.Fang (1932: 184).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan [Szechuan]: Mt Emei [Omei], Yu Xian Si, elev. ca. 2100 m, 18 July 1930, W. P. Fang 6640 (NAS00071820, lectotype designated by Fang 1939; isolectotypes CQNM0002906, IBSC0436540, PE00022814).</p> <p>= Acer stachyophyllum Hiern in Hooker (1875: 694).</p> <p>Note:—In the protologue, Fang (1932) cited a single gathering Fang 6640 but did not specify the herbarium where the type specimen is deposited. Later, Fang (1939) stated that the type was deposited at Sci (which represents the Herbarium of Biological Laboratory, the Science Society of China, now at NAS). Therefore, Fang achieved to designate the lectotype for the name.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174141DF06DEE94B6AFE3641B3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E96174141DF07DEE94D95FDBF4396.text	8F4E96174141DF07DEE94D95FDBF4396.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Salix triandroides W. P. Fang 1948	<div><p>Salix triandroides W.P.Fang (1948: 312).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan: Chengdu [Chengtu], Gao Pan Qiao [Kao-pan-chiao], 12 Mach 1947, W. P. Fang 19385 (holotype SZ00516907). Paratypes in CQNM: CHINA. Sichuan: Chengdu, in campus of Sichuan [Szechwan] University, 15 March 1947, W. P. Fang 19611 (CQNM0020746, SZ00052385, SZ00052393), Gao Pan Qiao, 27 March 1947, W. P. Fang 19637 (CQNM0020747).</p> <p>Note:—Fang (1948) cited W. P. Fang 19385 as the type without specifying the herbarium, and SZ00516907 is the only specimen traced, which may be considered as the holotype under Art. 9.1 (Turland et al. 2018). Fang (1948) also listed 39 paratypes, all of which were collected from Chengdu. There are two paratypes at CQNM, and no duplicate of W. P. Fang 19637 is traced in other herbaria.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174141DF07DEE94D95FDBF4396	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E96174140DF06DEE94856FAF244CA.text	8F4E96174140DF06DEE94856FAF244CA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stewartia gemmata S. S. Chien & W. C. Cheng 1931	<div><p>Stewartia gemmata S.S.Chien &amp; W.C.Cheng(1931: 66).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Zhejiang [Chekiang]: Western Tian Mu Shan [Tien-mu-shan], elev. ca. 760 m. 11 August 1929, S. S. Chien 737 (PE00024565, lectotype designated by Lin et al. 2008b; isolectotypes A00025208, CQNM0015726, IBSC0278435, NY00353932, PE00883511). Remaining syntypes: CHINA. Anhui [Anhwei]: Huangshan [Hwangshan], July 1925, R. C. Ching 3006 (A00025029, A00025030, IBSC0278355, NAU00017784, PE00883540, PE00883547).</p> <p>= Stewartia sinensis Rehder &amp; E.H.Wilson in Sargent(1915: 395).</p> <p>Note:— In the protologue, Chien &amp; Cheng (1931) designated fruiting specimen “ S. S. Chien 737 in Herb. Biol. Lab. Sci. Soc. China ” (now at NAS) and flowering specimen “ R. C. Ching 3006 in Nat. Centr. Univ. Nanking” (now at N) as types and they are syntypes under Art. 9.6. No syntype was able to be traced by the authors. Eleven isosyntypes, six duplicates of Chien 737 and six duplicates of Ching 3006 were traced. Among of them, the duplicates NAU00017784 and PE00883540 bear the identification label of Chien &amp; Cheng, while PE00024565 bears printed label with the word “type”. Lin et al. (2008b) chose PE00024565 from isosyntypes as the lectotype. This is allowed under Art. 9.12.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174140DF06DEE94856FAF244CA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E96174140DF06DEE94D02FAE042E6.text	8F4E96174140DF06DEE94D02FAE042E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Taxus chienii W. C. Cheng	<div><p>Taxus chienii W.C.Cheng</p> <p>in Cheng &amp; Chien (1934: 240).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Zhejiang [Chekiang]: Longquan, Maoshan, 7 October 1934, Y. Y. Ho 3166 (NAS00070071, lectotype first-step designated by Law 1947, second-step designated by Chen &amp; Deng 2015; isolectotypes NAS00022503, NAS00024819, NAS00068361, PE00000080, SYS00000507). Remaining syntypes: CHINA. Zhejiang: Longquan, Maoshan, elev. ca. 1000 m, 14 May 1933, S. Chen 1384 (A00018684, IBSC0003234, NAS00070073, PE00000078, PE00000079, PE00000084, SYS00095336, S(S-C-2195), WUK0000141, WUK0000144); 14 May 1934, S. Chen 3024 (CQNM0000208, IBSC0003236, NF1005377, PE00000085, SYS00095335, S(S-C-2194)). Paratypes in CQNM: CHINA. Zhejiang, Longquan, Maoshan, elev. ca. 1000, 11 May 1934, S. Chen 3010 (CQNM0000206, CQNM0000207, IBSC0003235, NAS00070070, NAS00070072, PE00000089, SYS00095334).</p> <p>≡ Pseudotaxus chienii (W.C.Cheng) W.C.Cheng (1947: 1).</p> <p>Note:— In the protologue, Cheng &amp; Chien (1934) designated three gatherings as types of male cone, female cone and fruiting, respectively and all of them are syntypes according to Art. 9.6. Lin &amp; Cao (2007) selected a duplicate of S. Chen 1384 at PE as the lectotype, which bears male cones. However, they overlooked that Law (1947) had indicated Y. Y. Ho 1633 as the type but did not specify the herbarium where the type is deposited. Law’s choice may be considered the first-step lectotipification. Under Art. 9.19, his choice must be followed and the choice of Lin &amp; Cao is to be superseded. Chen &amp; Deng (2015) further narrowed to a specimen (NAS00070071) as the lectotype under 9.17.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174140DF06DEE94D02FAE042E6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E96174140DF06DEE94A49FB8C463A.text	8F4E96174140DF06DEE94A49FB8C463A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Wikstroemia pilosa W. C. Cheng 1932	<div><p>Wikstroemia pilosa W.C.Cheng (1932: 140).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Zhejiang [Chekiang]: Zhuji, Wai Chen [Hweichen] Village, 12 July 1932, W. C. Cheng 2479 (IBSC0205092, lectotype designated by Tsai 1956; isolectotypes CQNM0015773, NAS00071897, NAS00071898, PE00025556, PE00025557, PE00025558, PE00025559).</p> <p>Note —Although only one gathering was cited in the protologue (Cheng 1932), no herbarium was specified. Eight duplicates were traced and all of them are syntypes under Art. 9.6, but none of them have the accompanying illustration (fig. 6) in the protologue. Tsai (1956) inadvertently designated the sheets at IBSC as type [“ 模式标本 ”], although this specimen is in bad condition with a fragment of branch and an lithographic illustration of the duplicate PE00025559. The usage of the type is a correctable error under Art. 9.10 (Turland et al. 2018).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174140DF06DEE94A49FB8C463A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E96174140DF05DEE94B99FB9440E4.text	8F4E96174140DF05DEE94B99FB9440E4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ulmus szechuanica W. P. Fang 1947	<div><p>Ulmus szechuanica W.P.Fang (1947: 22).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Sichuan [Szechuan]: Chengdu, Jing Ju Si [Tsing-chu-ssu], 10 June 1947, W. P. Fang 19667 (PE00678315, SZ); Qing Yang Gong [Tsing-yung-kong], 1 April 1939, W. P. Fang 13289 (PE00023065, KUN0601580, SZ); Wu Hou Ci [Wu-hou-tzu], 7 March 1937, S. S. Chien 5861 (SZ). One paratype in CQNM: CHINA. Sichuan: Chengdu, Jing Ju Si, 16 March 1946, W. P. Fang 19512 (A00034327, CQNM0004146).</p> <p>Note:—Fang (1947) designated three gatherings, W. P. Fang 19667 (mature leaves), W. P. Fang 13289 (fruiting) and S. S. Chien 5861 (flowering) as types, and all of them are syntypes according to Art.9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). It is informed that the duplicates at SZ are more complete and in better condition to identify this species. Because we did not examine the specimens there, we do not designate the lectotype for the name.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174140DF05DEE94B99FB9440E4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E96174143DF05DEE94924FABF463E.text	8F4E96174143DF05DEE94924FABF463E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Distylium lanceolatum Chun	<div><p>Distylium lanceolatum Chun in Cheng et al. (1936: 124), nom. invalid.</p> <p>Type:— China. Guangxi [Kwangsi]: Luocheng Xian [Lucheng], [Mung Tung Kou], elev. ca. 360 m, 30 May 1928, R. C. Ching 5512 (CQNM0015772, NAS00344151, NAS00344152, NAS00344154, NAS00344155, NY00356131, PE00029872).</p> <p>Note: —This name has been considered inadvertently to be published by W. C. Cheng (Walker 1944), to whom the authorship was ascribed (i.e., IPNI), and it has long been treated as a synonym of Distylium dunnianum H.Léveillé (1912: 12) in Chinese floras (Chang 1961, 1979, Zhang et al. 2003). However, when Cheng in Cheng et al (1936) commented on this name proposed by Chun (W. Y. Chun), he did not describe it with a diagnosis or description in Latin, where Art. 39.1 of ICN (Turland et al. 2018) did not meet. Chang (1961) stated the diagnostic characters of “ D. lanceolatum Chun ” the same as D. dunnniaum and cited the Latin diagnosis of Léveillé (1912), but he merely listed the former as a synonym of the latter, where Art. 36.1 of ICN applied and Chang (1961) did not validate this name either. For the proposed type specimen of this name, the gathering R. C. Ching 5512 has duplicates in the above cited herbaria. We were not able to trace the locality of this gathering except for somewhere near a cave mouth (Tung Kou) 30–35 km north of Luocheng County, Northeast Guangxi. Further field observation is suggested to validate this name.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174143DF05DEE94924FABF463E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E96174143DF05DEE94DABFB504263.text	8F4E96174143DF05DEE94DABFB504263.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Oreocnide kwangsiensis Handel-Mazzetti 1931	<div><p>Oreocnide kwangsiensis Handel-Mazzetti (1931a: 2).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Guangxi [Kwangsi]: Lingyun Xian [Linyen], [Bing-loo], elev. ca. 860 m, 2 August 1928, R. C. Ching 6630 (lectotype designated here, PE00023269; isolectotypes CQNM0004988, IBSC0375020, NAS00070477, PE00023270).</p> <p>Note:—Handel-Mazzetti (1931a) did not specify the herbarium where the type specimen was deposited. Five duplicates were traced and all of them are thus syntypes under Art. 9.6 (Turland et al. 2018). Among of them, the duplicate at PE (00023269), which Lin &amp; Yang (2015b) indicated as “ holotype ”, bears the printed identification label with the annotation “type” and is preserved in good condition. It is therefore selected as the lectotype here.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174143DF05DEE94DABFB504263	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
8F4E96174143DF05DEE94F69FF734594.text	8F4E96174143DF05DEE94F69FF734594.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Oreocnide tremula Handel-Mazzetti 1931	<div><p>Oreocnide tremula Handel-Mazzetti (1931b: 297).</p> <p>Type:— CHINA. Guangdong [Kwangtun]:? Shaoguan [Schautschou], [Lungtou-schan], elev. ca. 700 m, 20 September 1917, R. E. Mell 930 (holotype WU0035568). One paratype in CQNM: CHINA. Guangxi [Kwangsi]: Luocheng Xian [Lucheng], Du Feng Shan [Chu Feng Shan], 15 km SW Sanfang [Shan Fang], elev. ca. 640 m, 7 June 1928, R. C. Ching 5779 (as “ 5775 ” in the protologue) (CQNM0004989, IBSC0356277, NAS00070478, NAS00070479, PE00023274).</p> <p>= Archiboehmeria atrata (Gagnepain 1928: 556) C.J.Chen (1980: 479).</p> <p>Note: —In the protologue, R. E. Mell 930 was designated as type without specifying the herbarium. Only one sheet of this gathering is traced at WU, and this is most probably the holotype. In addition, Handel-Mazzetti (1931b) also cited two gatherings of R. C. Ching (5713 and “ 5775 ”) from Guangxi as paratypes. However, R. C. Ching “ 5575 ” is the type of Vittaria nana Ching (1929: 11). After searching the specimens in the herbarium, the collecting number “ 5575 ” should be a typographical error of R. C. Ching 5579, collected on the same date from the same locality as R. C. Ching 5775.On the duplicates of R. C. Ching 5579, it bears the label with annotation of “ Oreocnide tremula Hand. -Maz., nov. sp.”.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F4E96174143DF05DEE94F69FF734594	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Chen, Feng;He, Hai	Chen, Feng, He, Hai (2022): The historical relics in Chongqing Natural History Museum: An annotated checklist of original materials for 37 names of Chinese seed plants. Phytotaxa 530 (1): 38-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.530.1.3
