identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
039687B1477F6C2E9DD118200C977C76.text	039687B1477F6C2E9DD118200C977C76.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex Gravenhorst 1829	<div><p>Key to species of Campoplex Gravenhorst from China</p> <p>1. Face rugose to rugose-punctate (Fig. 66E); pronotum punctate, rugulose-punctate or rugose-punctate dorsally; metanotum rugose to rugose-punctate; mesopleuron punctate to rugose-punctate, punctures dense (Fig. 66B); propodeum strongly rugose, area superomedia rugulose to trans-striate (Fig. 66C)......................................................... 2</p> <p>-. Face granulose to granulose-punctate (Fig. 2E), sometimes punctate; pronotum usually granulose to granulose-punctate dorsally, sometimes punctate dorsally, rarely rugulose or rugulose-punctate, never rugose; metanotum usually granulose; mesopleuron usually granulose, punctures sparse to dense (Fig. 2B); propodeum granulose to rugose, area superomedia usually granulose (Fig. 2C).................................................................................... 6</p> <p>2. Clypeus rugose; malar space rugulose; epicnemial carina with a notch-like constriction near fore coxa; fore wing areolet small, shorter than stalk................................................................. C. homonae (Sonan, 1930)</p> <p>-. Clypeus without rugae (Fig. 66E; but rugose-punctate in C. xizangensis sp. nov.); malar space nearly smooth to granulose; epicnemial carina without a notch-like constriction near fore coxa; fore wing areolet large, longer than stalk............. 3</p> <p>3. Clypeus punctate, truncated apically (Fig. 66E); mandible without lamella (Fig. 66E); occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base; pronotum rugose-punctate dorsally; mesoscutum not rugose in notaulic region (Fig. 66G); propodeal median area not depressed (Fig. 66C); sixth and seventh metasomal tergites with emarginations medially................................................................................................ C. plicopunctatus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Clypeus granulose-punctate or rugose-punctate, slightly arched to arched (Fig. 82E); mandible with lamella; occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base; pronotum punctate to rugulose-punctate dorsally; mesoscutum rugose in notaulic region; propodeal median area moderately to deeply depressed; sixth and seventh metasomal tergites without emarginations medially............................................................................................ 4</p> <p>4. Clypeus rugose-punctate (Fig. 82E); malar space nearly smooth; frons with median carina absent (Fig. 82E); interocellar distance 1.3× ocello-ocular distance (Fig. 82F); pronotum rugulose-punctate dorsally; propodeal area superomedia rugulose (Fig. 82C)............................................................................. C. xizangensis sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Clypeus granulose-punctate (Fig. 76E); malar space granulose; frons with median carina present; interocellar distance 1.8–2.0× ocello-ocular distance; pronotum punctate dorsally; propodeal area superomedia rugose to trans-rugose................. 5</p> <p>5. Face rugose (Fig. 76E); scutellum rugose-punctate; mesopleuron rugose-punctate, striations extending to prepectal carina (Fig. 76B); latero-longitudinal carina present (Fig. 76C); first metasomal segment with dorso-lateral carina absent (Fig. 76H); second metasomal tergite apically and third tergite apico-laterally reddish brown......................... C. strigatus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Face rugose-punctate (Fig. 70E); scutellum granulose-punctate anteriorly, rugose posteriorly; mesopleuron punctate, striations not extending to prepectal carina (Fig. 70B); latero-longitudinal carina absent (Fig. 70C); first metasomal segment with dorsolateral carina present (Fig. 70H); metasoma entirely black................................ C. pseudostrigatus sp. nov.</p> <p>6. Propodeal medio-longitudinal carina widely diverging posteriorly and often weak to absent (Fig. 54C); area superomedia not well formed, sometimes carina stronger where propodeum strongly rugose to striate; otherwise weakly rugose to granulose..................................................................................................... 7</p> <p>-. Propodeal medio-longitudinal carina distinct and not widely diverging posteriorly, parallel-sided or somewhat parallel-sided (Fig. 20C); junction between area superomedia and area petiolaris discernible and area superomedia well formed; propodeum always distinctly granulose............................................................................. 15</p> <p>7. All propodeal carinae very weakly developed (Fig. 22C); area basalis confluent with area superomedia area (Fig. 22C); area petiolaris granulose-rugulose (Fig. 22C); propodeal median area flat (Fig. 22C); fore wing areolet absent (Fig. 22A)......................................................................................... C. confluentus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. At least some propodeal carinae distinctly developed (Fig. 54C); area basalis separated from area superomedia area; propodeal area petiolaris trans-striate or granulose (except C. obtusoclypeus sp. nov.); median area usually depressed; fore wing areolet present.............................................................................................. 8</p> <p>8. Clypeus smooth and shiny below; interocellar distance approx. 0.8× ocello-ocular distance (Fig. 54F); area petiolaris granulose-rugulose (Fig. 54C); propodeal median and lateral longitudinal carinae absent (Fig. 54C).... C. obtusoclypeus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Clypeus entirely mat; interocellar distance 1.0–1.7× ocello-ocular distance; area petiolaris trans-striate or granulose; propodeal median longitudinal carina absent to weakly developed under costula, but gradually stronger developed apically, lateral longitudinal carina absent or present.......................................................................... 9</p> <p>9. Malar space 0.8× basal width of mandible (Fig. 34E); latero-longitudinal carina absent (Fig. 34C); fore wing areolet without stalk (Fig. 34A); hind femur blackish brown (Fig. 33)....................................... C. grandicella sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Malar space 0.33–0.6× basal width of mandible; latero-longitudinal carina usually present; fore wing areolet with stalk; hind femur yellowish brown to reddish brown (except C. angustaulacis sp. nov.)...................................... 10</p> <p>10. Interocellar distance approx. 1.0× ocello-ocular distance and 1.4× distance between median and lateral ocelli (Fig. 64F); propodeal latero-longitudinal carina strongly developed (Fig. 64C); fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part (Fig. 64A)................................................................................ C. protenus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Interocellar distance 0.8–1.7× ocello-ocular distance and 1.3–2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli; latero-longitudinal carina absent to weakly developed; fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part..................... 11</p> <p>11. Propodeum nearly entirely granulose (Fig. 12C); propodeal median area broadly and shallowly depressed (Fig. 12C); area petiolaris granulose (Fig. 12C); second metasomal tergite 0.6–0.7× as long as first tergite........... C. apacicarinatus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Propodeum sculpture coarser, not entirely granulose; propodeal median area nearly flat to narrowly and deeply depressed; area petiolaris trans-striate; second metasomal tergite 0.8–0.9× as long as first tergite.................................. 12</p> <p>12. Mesopleuron and metapleuron strongly and densely granulose, as remainder of mesosoma, dull; propodeum granulose-rugose with a median groove................................................................................. 13</p> <p>-. Mesopleuron and metapleuron weakly granulose, weaker than remainder of mesosoma; propodeum rugose to granulose-rugose, median area nearly flat........................................................................... 14</p> <p>13. Interocellar distance approx. 2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli (Fig. 10F); mesopleuron granulose-punctate (Fig. 10B); propodeal median area deeply depressed (Fig. 10C); fore and mid coxae brown (Fig. 9); hind femur blackish brown (Fig. 9).............................................................................. C. angustaulacis sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Interocellar distance approx. 1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli (Fig. 56F); mesopleuron granulose to rugulosepunctate (Fig. 56B); propodeal median area moderately depressed (Fig. 56C); fore and mid coxae yellow (Fig. 55); hind femur yellowish brown (Fig. 55)............................................... C. oriens Maheshwary &amp; Gupta, 1977</p> <p>14. Face granulose medially and rugulose laterally; clypeus strongly granulose; propodeum area dentipara finely granulose; posterior transverse carina making an angle of 80° with pleural carina................ C. chiuae Maheshwary &amp; Gupta, 1977</p> <p>-. Face finely granulose medially and mat laterally; clypeus mat granulose, with scattered punctures; propodeum area dentipara rugose; posterior transverse carina making an angle of 60° with pleural carina................. C. sauteri (Uchida, 1932)</p> <p>15. Face and mesoscutum finely punctate; temple punctate; second metasomal tergite punctate; scape and pedicel yellowish brown; hind femur black.............................................................. C. graphoritae (Uchida, 1942)</p> <p>-. Face and mesoscutum with different sculpture, not finely punctate; temple usually granulose; second metasomal tergite granulose; scape and pedicel yellowish brown to blackish brown; hind femur yellowish brown to black..................... 16</p> <p>16. Length of body 3.0– 4.5 mm; trans-striations under tegula usually weak; fore wing areolet absent or present with 3rs-m vein incomplete; tarsal claws pectinate and with very weakly developed teeth........................................ 17</p> <p>-. Length of body 3.6–8.0 mm; trans-striations under tegula usually normally developed; fore wing areolet present; tarsal claws variable............................................................................................ 21</p> <p>17. Propodeal area superomedia long and narrow; latero-longitudinal carina absent; area petiolaris trans-striate; nervellus intercepted little below middle............................................................................. 18</p> <p>-. Propodeal area superomedia normally developed; latero-longitudinal carina present; area petiolaris trans-striate or not; nervellus intercepted at lower 0.1–0.3......................................................................... 19</p> <p>18. Areolet absent (Fig. 72A); malar space approx. 0.6× basal width of mandible (Fig. 72E); propodeal area superomedia incompletely formed (Fig. 72C); temple not swollen behind eyes (Fig. 72F); hind femur yellowish brown (Fig. 71)............................................................................................... C. assosae Kittel, 2016</p> <p>-. Areolet present with 3rs-m vein incomplete; malar space approx. equal to basal width of mandible; area superomedia completely formed; temple swollen behind eyes; hind femur brownish............. C. pygmaeus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977</p> <p>19. Occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base; external angles of second discal cell acute (60°) (Fig. 4A); hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.1 (Fig. 4A); tarsal claws not pectinate; first metasomal segment with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove (Fig. 4H); second tergite approx. 3.0× longer than its apical width............ C. acarus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base; external angles of second discal cell acute (70°); hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.2–0.3; tarsal claws pectinate but teeth weak; first metasomal segment without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove; second tergite 1.0–1.1× longer than its apical width.................................... 20</p> <p>20. Propodeal area petiolaris weakly rugose (Fig. 28C); median area slightly depressed (Fig. 28C); costula absent (Fig. 28C); hind femur approx. 4.6× longer than wide; hind femur black (Fig. 27); metasoma entirely black (Fig. 27)..... C. exareola sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Propodeal area petiolaris trans-striate (Fig. 36C); median area not depressed (Fig. 36C); costula present (Fig. 36C); hind femur approx. 4.0× longer than wide; hind femur yellowish brown (Fig. 35); metasoma not entirely black (Fig. 35)................................................................................................ C. granulosus sp. nov.</p> <p>21. Clypeus long, sharp apically (Fig. 46E); malar space 0.9× basal width of mandible (Fig. 46E); temple swollen behind eyes (Fig. 46F); trans-striations below tegula short and weak (Fig. 46B); mesopleural fovea absent (Fig. 46B); area petiolaris granuloserugulose (Fig. 46C); medio-longitudinal carina developed below costulae and absent apically (Fig. 46C); fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu from its middle (Fig. 46A); external angles of second discal cell vertical (Fig. 46A); hind wing with nervellus intercepted slightly below middle (Fig. 46A); sixth and seventh metasomal tergites with emarginations medially; tegula black (Fig. 46G)........................................................................ C. longiclypeus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Clypeus short, usually not sharp apically; malar space less than 0.9× basal width of mandible; temple swollen or not swollen behind eyes; trans-striations below tegula short and weak to long and strong; mesopleural fovea present; area petiolaris not granulose-rugulose; medio-longitudinal carina completely developed or weakly developed below costulae and gradually stronger apically; fore wing areolet usually emitting 2m-cu from its apical part; external angles of second discal cell acute; hind wing with nervellus usually intercepted below; sixth and seventh metasomal tergites usually without emarginations medially; tegula usually not black..................................................................................... 22</p> <p>22. Clypeus finely granulose (Fig. 18E); area petiolaris granulose medially and rugose laterally (Fig. 18C); propodeal latero-longitudinal carina absent (Fig. 18C); fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu from its basal part (Fig. 18A); metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed............................................................... C. collucatus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Clypeus granulose to punctate; area petiolaris not granulose medially and rugose laterally; propodeal latero-longitudinal carina present (except in C. tanae sp. nov.); fore wing areolet usually emitting 2m-cu from its apical part; metasoma from third tergite on moderately compressed or not compressed.............................................................. 23</p> <p>23. Antenna with first flagellomere as long as second flagellomere; clypeus punctate; frons rugose-punctate (Fig. 62E); metanotum shallowly punctate; external angles of second discal cell acute (50°) (Fig. 62A); sixth and seventh metasomal tergites with weak emarginations medially............................................................... C. proportionis sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Antenna with first flagellomere usually longer than second flagellomere; clypeus granulose, granulose-punctate or punctate; frons granulose to rugose-punctate; metanotum granulose to rugose-punctate; external angles of second discal cell acute (60– 75°); sixth and seventh metasomal tergites without emarginations medially (except in C. bazariae).................... 24</p> <p>24. Intercocellar distance approx. 2.1× ocello-ocular distance (Fig. 32F); occipital carina gradually narrowed dorsally; hind wing with nervellus intercepted above its middle (Fig. 32A); thyridium large; mandible except teeth black (Fig. 32E)........................................................................................... C. grandialphus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Intercocellar distance 0.8–1.8× ocello-ocular distance; occipital carina evenly arched; hind wing with nervellus intercepted at or below the middle; thyridium small; mandible except teeth yellowish brown.................................... 25</p> <p>25. Malar space granulose-punctate (Fig. 6D); frons rugose-punctate; propodeal area petiolaris rugulose-punctate (Fig. 6C); antenna brown (Fig. 5).............................................................. C. adustantennalis sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Malar space, frons and propodeal area petiolaris with different sculpture; antenna black (except in C. liuae sp. nov.)...... 26</p> <p>26. Body length 3.6–4.8 mm; clypeus with apical margin truncated or almost truncated; temple slightly swollen to swollen; hind femur 3.8–4.6× longer than wide; tarsal claws pectinate with weakly developed teeth; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by its length................................................................................. 27</p> <p>-. Body length 3.8–8.0 mm; clypeus with apical margin truncated to arched; temple not swollen; hind femur 4.0–5.0× longer than wide; tarsal claws pectinate with weak to strong teeth; position of thyridium variable............................... 30</p> <p>27. First flagellomere approx. as long as second flagellomere; pronotum rugulose dorsally; mesopleuron punctate (Fig. 44B); propodeal area superomedia smooth and shiny, weakly rugulose-granulose (Fig. 44C); propodeal latero-longitudinal carina weak (Fig. 44C); fore wing vein 1cu-a distad of M&amp;RS by 0.2 of its length (Fig. 44A); third metasomal tergite as long as wide apically............................................................................... C. lobatus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. First flagellomere 1.2–1.4× longer than second flagellomere; pronotum not rugulose dorsally; mesopleuron granulose, granulose-punctate or rugose-punctate; propodeal area superomedia mat, granulose; propodeal latero-longitudinal carina strong; fore wing vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS; third metasomal tergite 0.6–0.7× as long as its apical width........................ 28</p> <p>28. Malar space approx. 0.7× basal width of mandible (Fig. 16E); mandible with upper tooth as long as its lower tooth (Fig. 16E); temple slightly swollen behind eyes (Fig. 16F); pronotum rugulose-punctate dorsally................ C. atricrus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Malar space approx. 0.5× basal width of mandible; mandible with upper tooth longer than its lower tooth; temple swollen behind eyes; pronotum granulose dorsally................................................................... 29</p> <p>29. Mesoscutum and scutellum granulose-punctate (Fig. 24G); mesopleuron granulose-punctate (Fig. 24B); hind wing with nervellus inclivous (Fig. 24A); inner spur of hind tibia approx. 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus; dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove of first metasomal segment present (Fig. 24H); metasoma entirely black (Fig. 23); mid femur brownish, hind femur blackish brown (Fig. 23)............................................................. C. cyclus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Mesoscutum and scutellum granulose (Fig. 68G); mesopleuron granulose (Fig. 68B); hind wing with nervellus vertical (Fig. 68A); inner spur of hind tibia approx. 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus; dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove of first metasomal segment absent (Fig. 68H); metasoma not entirely black (Fig. 67); mid and hind femur yellowish brown (Fig. 67).............................................................................. C. pseudocyclus sp. nov.</p> <p>30. Propodeal area petiolaris granulose (Fig. 78C); hind wing nervellus vertical (Fig. 78A); hind femur blackish brown (Fig. 77); hind tibia clearly banded (Fig. 77).......................................................... C. taenius sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Propodeal area petiolaris not granulose; hind wing nervellus usually inclivous; hind femur yellowish brown to blackish; colour of hind tibia variable.................................................................................. 31</p> <p>31. Propodeal area superomedia granulose-rugulose (Fig. 30C); fore wing marginal cell with distal part of surrounding vein approx. 2.5× longer than proximal one (Fig. 30A); fore wing vein 1cu-a distad of M&amp;RS by approx. 0.3 of its length (Fig. 30A); metasoma entirely granulose except petiole; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by approx. 0.6× of its length; tegula blackish brown (Fig. 30G).............................................................. C. granalvus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Propodeal area superomedia usually granulose; fore wing marginal cell with distal part of surrounding vein 1.5–2.0× longer than proximal one; fore wing vein 1cu-a opposite or slightly distad of M&amp;RS; metasoma usually only postpetiole and second tergite granulose; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by at least its length; tegula yellow to yellowish brown..32</p> <p>32. Face finely coriaceous, densely punctate; interocellar area distinctly punctate; second and subsequent metasomal tergites finely coriaceous; sixth and seventh metasomal tergites with emarginations medially.................. C. bazariae Sheng, 2014</p> <p>-. Face granulose to granulose punctate; interocellar area granulose; second and subsequent metasomal tergites mat to coriaceous; sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially.................................................... 33</p> <p>33. First flagellomere as long as second flagellomere; propodeal area basalis with distinct carina posteriorly (Fig. 42C); propodeal area petiolaris granulose, rugose laterally (Fig. 42C); antenna brown (Fig. 41); postpetiole yellowish brown (Fig. 41).............................................................................................. C. liuae sp. nov.</p> <p>-. First flagellomere longer than second flagellomere; propodeal area basalis without carina posteriorly; propodeal area petiolaris usually trans-striate; antenna black; postpetiole black........................................................ 34</p> <p>34. Malar space smooth; area petiolaris rugulose-granulose (Fig. 60C); hind wing with nervellus vertical (Fig. 60A); metasoma from third tergite on yellowish brown laterally and remainder of metasoma black (Fig. 59)...... C. perpendicularis sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Malar space sculptured; area petiolaris not rugulose-granulose; hind wing with nervellus usually inclivous; metasoma usually entirely black....................................................................................... 35</p> <p>35. Metanotum granulose-rugose; propodeal area superomedia rugulose (Fig. 38C); hind leg except coxa and telotarsi yellow...................................................................................... C. galbipedis sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Metanotum not granulose-rugose; propodeal area superomedia not rugulose; hind leg sometimes with femur black, tibia not entirely yellow and tarsus usually wholly blackish brown..................................................... 36</p> <p>36. Malar space shiny, approx. 0.3× basal width of mandible; mandible with upper tooth longer than lower tooth; basal 0.7 of mid femur blackish brown (Fig. 13).......................................................... C. artivultus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Malar space not shiny, 0.45–0.8× basal width of mandible; mandible with upper tooth usually as long as lower tooth; mid femur usually yellowish brown............................................................................... 37</p> <p>37. Frons with median carina present; metasoma not entirely black................................................ 38</p> <p>-. Frons with median carina absent; metasoma entirely black.................................................... 40</p> <p>38. Face granulose-punctate (Fig. 50E); metanotum rugose-punctate; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by its diameter; fore and mid coxae blackish; metasoma black with second tergite laterally yellowish brown (Fig. 49)............................................................................................... C. medicarinatus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Face granulose; metanotum granulose; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite equal or more than its diameter; fore and mid coxae at least apically yellow; metasoma from third tergite on laterally yellowish brown..................... 39</p> <p>39. Interocellar distance approx. 1.8× ocello-ocular distance and 2.3× distance between median and lateral ocelli (Fig. 26F); occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base; pronotum punctate dorsally; mesopleuron granulose-punctate with punctures dense, punctures separated less than their diameter (Fig. 26B); metapleuron punctate (Fig. 26B); propodeal area petiolaris trans-striate (Fig. 26C); propodeal latero-longitudinal carina present (Fig. 26C).......... C. densipunctatus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Interocellar distance approx. equal to ocello-ocular distance and 1.4× distance between median and lateral ocelli (Fig. 80E); occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base; pronotum granulose dorsally; mesopleuron granulose with punctures sparse, punctures separated large than their diameter (Fig. 80B); metapleuron granulose (Fig. 80B); propodeal area petiolaris rugose (Fig. 80C); propodeal latero-longitudinal carina absent (Fig. 80C).................... C. tanae sp. nov.</p> <p>40. Malar space 0.45× basal width of mandible (Fig. 2E); mandible with upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth; trans-striations below tegula weak (Fig. 2B); propodeal area petiolaris rugose (Fig. 2C); second metasomal tergite 0.9× as long as first tergite................................................................................ C. absitus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Malar space more than 0.45× basal width of mandible; mandible with upper tooth as long as lower tooth; trans-striations below tegula weak to strong; propodeal area petiolaris usually trans-striate; second metasomal tergite usually less than 0.9× first tergite............................................................................................... 41</p> <p>41. Propodeal area superomedia rugose; fore wing pterostigma whitish basally; areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its middle part; fore and mid coxae yellow........................................................ C. egregius (Kokujev, 1915)</p> <p>-. Propodeal area superomedia granulose; fore wing pterostigma usually not whitish basally; areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part; fore and mid coxae usually black.............................................................. 42</p> <p>42. Hind femur black; hind tibia clearly banded, yellowish brown medially......................................... 43</p> <p>-. Hind femur yellowish brown; hind tibia usually not clearly banded, unicolored or infuscated apically.................. 46</p> <p>43. Interocellar distance approx. 1.3× ocello-ocular distance (Fig. 48F); propodeal petiolar area rugose (Fig. 48C); all trochanters blackish brown................................................................. C. maurotrochanter sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Interocellar distance 0.8–1.1× ocello-ocular distance; propodeal petiolar area trans-striate; not all trochanters blackish brown................................................................................................... 44</p> <p>44. Malar space approx. 0.8× basal width of mandible; metapleuron and propodeum coarsely granulose, sculpture different from mesopleuron; middle femur with a basal black ring....................... C. maximalus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977</p> <p>-. Malar space 0.5–0.7× basal width of mandible; metapleuron and propodeum with normally granulose, sculpture more or less resembling to that of mesopleuron; middle femur entirely yellowish brown...................................... 45</p> <p>45. Clypeus with apical margin truncated (Fig. 58E); pronotum granulose with sparse punctures dorsally; hind wing with nervellus inclivous (Fig. 58A).................................................................. C. parassosae sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Clypeus with apical margin slightly arched; pronotum rugulose-mat dorsally; hind wing with nervellus vertical......................................................................... C. septentrionalis Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977</p> <p>46. Clypeus with apical margin truncate (Fig. 74E); propodeal area petiolaris strongly rugose (Fig. 74C); first metasomal segment without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove (Fig. 74H); fore wing pterostigma whitish basally (Fig. 74A); fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus brown....................................................... C. shanxiensis sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Clypeus with apical margin slightly arched to arched; propodeal area petiolaris trans-striate; first metasomal segment with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove; fore wing pterostigma not whitish basally; fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus yellow to yellowish brown............................................................................. 47</p> <p>47. Pronotum punctate dorsally; mesopleuron punctate; hind femur 4.0–4.1× longer than wide.......................... 48</p> <p>-. Pronotum granulose dorsally; mesopleuron granulose to granulose-punctate; hind femur 4.5–5.0× longer than wide...... 49</p> <p>48. Frons granulose-punctate (Fig. 20E); propodeum compact (Fig. 20C); hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.1 of its length (Fig. 20A); thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by 1.5× its diameter; third tergite approx. 0.6× as long as its apical width; scape and pedicel brown (Fig. 20E); fore and mid coxae brown.................... C. concretus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Frons granulose; propodeum not compact; hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length (Fig. 52A); thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by its diameter; third tergite approx. 0.8× as long as its apical width; scape and pedicel yellowish brown anteriorly and brown dorsally (Fig. 52E); fore and mid coxae yellow............ C. monochroma sp. nov.</p> <p>49. Propodeal sculpture similar to that on mesopleuron and metapleuron; propodeal area dentipara granulose (Fig. 40C); second metasomal tergite approx. 0.6× as long as first tergite.............................................. C. hei sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Propodeal sculpture coarser to that on mesopleuron and metapleuron; propodeal area dentipara granulose-rugose; second metasomal tergite 0.7–0.9× as long as first tergite............................................................... 50</p> <p>50. Punctures of mesopleuron large and dense (Fig. 84B); all propodeal carinae strong (Fig. 84C); malar space yellowish brown (Fig. 84E)....................................................................... C. xuthomelonus sp. nov.</p> <p>-. Punctures of mesopleuron small and sparse (Fig. 8B); all propodeal carinae relatively weak (Fig. 8C); malar space black (Fig. 8E)............................................................... C. anatolus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1477F6C2E9DD118200C977C76	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1477B6C219DD118E80AA47860.text	039687B1477B6C219DD118E80AA47860.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campopleginae Forster 1869	<div><p>Subfamily: Campopleginae Förster, 1869</p> <p>Genus: Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829</p> <p>Type species: Ichneumon difformis Gmelin, 1790; designation by Westwood (1840).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Body length 3–11 mm, fore wing length 2–8 mm; clypeus flattened to convex, apical margin truncated to arched, sometimes thick medially; mandible with or without lamella; malar space 0.3–1.0× basal width of mandible; frons with or without a median carina; occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina at or above mandible base; eyes weakly or not at all emarginate opposite antennal socket; temple swollen or not; pronotum in profile moderately long, epomia vestigial or absent; scutellum subtriangular, convex; speculum smooth and shiny; mesopleural furrow impressed as a sharp groove; propodeum with area superomedia and area petiolaris confluent but the junction of them discernible; median area flat to strongly depressed; apex of propodeum usually not reaching middle of hind coxa; propodeal spiracle round to oval; fore wing areolet absent or present, if present, usually emitting 2m-cu from its apical part; external angles of second discal cell acute (55°–75°), or rarely 90°; 1cu-a opposite to distad of M&amp;RS; nervellus usually intercepted, if intercepted, usually at its lower half; first metasomal segment round in cross-section at basal 0.3, sometimes a little squarish, with or without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove; suture separating first tergite from its sternite at middle of segment or a little below middle; glymma absent; metasoma except petiole mat to granulose; metasoma from third segment on compressed to round; male genital parameres broad and round apically or sometimes with a shallow emargination apically.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1477B6C219DD118E80AA47860	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147746C239DD11C280B577ED8.text	039687B147746C239DD11C280B577ED8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex absitus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex absitus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 1–2</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Shaanxi, Hanzhong Liubaxian, 20.VII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201308253 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 1) holotype. Body length 4.5 mm, fore wing length 3.5 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 23 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 2E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 2E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.45× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 2F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 1.8× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 2G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 2B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 2B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 2C) with anterior transverse carina far from base, area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose, polished; area petiolaris rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 2A) areolet present and with a short stalk, emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (75°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.2.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.6× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 2H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.3× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.9× as long as first tergite, 1.8× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its diameter. Third tergite 0.8× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.8× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 2D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, tegula, fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus, and hind trochantellus, yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown, tibia apically infuscated; hind leg with coxa and trochanter black, femur, tibia subbasally and apically, tarsus from basal 0.7 on brown, remainder of hind leg whitish yellow; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Shaanxi).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. taenius sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having interocellar distance 1.2× ocello-ocular distance, propodeal anterior transverse carina far removed from base, fore wing external angles of second discal cell less acute (75°), and third metasomal tergite 0.8× longer than its apical width.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “absitus” (Latin for “remote”), because its propodeal anterior transverse carina is far removed from base of propodeum.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147746C239DD11C280B577ED8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147766C229DD11AB00C4E7DFD.text	039687B147766C229DD11AB00C4E7DFD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex acarus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex acarus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 3–4</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Hubei, Shennongjia Muyuzhen, 19.V.2012, Huang Junhao, No 20046116 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 3) holotype. Body length 3.6 mm, fore wing length 2.8 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with at least 16 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.15× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 4E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 4E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin slightly arched. Malar space granulose, 0.8× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 4F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 1.6× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, slightly swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose, polished, not trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 4G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 4B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 4B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 4C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose, polished; area petiolaris rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed but not high; propodeal spiracle small and round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 4A) without areolet. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.1× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.55× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws not pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 4H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.8× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.8× as long as first tergite, 3.0× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its diameter. Third tergite equal to its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.9× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 4D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, tegula, fore and mid legs trochanters and trochantellus, fore coxa apically and hind trochantellus whitish yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore coxa basally and telotarsus brown, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown; mid leg brown except tibia medially pale whitish; hind leg blackish brown with tibia medially pale whitish; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Hubei).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. granulosus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having apical margin of clypeus slightly arched, malar space 0.8× basal width of mandible, temple not swollen behind eyes, pronotum not trans-striate below, propodeal area petiolaris rugose, second metasomal tergite 3.0× longer than its apical width, and body color different.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “acares” (Greek for “short and small”), because its body size is small.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147766C229DD11AB00C4E7DFD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147716C269DD11ED5088F7E69.text	039687B147716C269DD11ED5088F7E69.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex adustantennalis Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex adustantennalis sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 5–6</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Gansu, Zhenyuanxian, VII.1981, Cao Wei, No 815326 (ZJUH). Paratype: 1 female, Heilongjiang, Jingpohu, 26.VII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 962390.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 5) holotype. Body length 6.6 mm, fore wing length 5.2 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 35 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 6D) granulose-punctate to punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 6D) punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched. Malar space granulose-punctate, 0.7× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose-punctate, median carina absent. Vertex granulose-punctate. Interocellar distance (Fig. 6E) 1.7× ocello-ocular distance and 1.8× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 6F) granulose-punctate. Scutellum punctate and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 6B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 6B) punctate, punctures smaller than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 6C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose, with sparse punctures; area petiolaris rugulose-punctate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 6A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.9× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.4 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 6G) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove absent. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.9× its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.7× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.1× longer than hind femur, ovipositor gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi yellowish brown; antenna, scape and pedicel brown; tegula yellow; fore leg yellowish brown with coxa black and telotarsus brown; mid leg yellowish brown with coxa and telotarsus black, trochanter brown; hind leg with coxa and trochanter black, trochantellus basally, tibia subbasally and apically, tarsus except basal tarsomere 0.8 brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma black except postpetiole apically, second tergite apically and third segment basal-laterally brown.</p> <p>Variation. Antenna with 35–39 flagellomeres; hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.2–0.4; second and third metasomal tergites yellowish brown.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Gansu, Heilongjiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. monochroma sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having malar space 0.7× basal width of mandible, frons rugose-punctate, propodeal area petiolaris rugulose-punctate, first metasomal segment without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove, ovipositor sheath approx. 1.1× longer than hind femur, hind tibia subbasally and apically brown, second metasomal tergite apically, and third metasomal tergite basal-laterally brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “adustus” (Latin for “brown”) and “antenna” (Latin for “antenna”), because of its antenna brown.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147716C269DD11ED5088F7E69	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147736C389DD11A20085D79DC.text	039687B147736C389DD11A20085D79DC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex anatolus Gupta & Maheshwary 1977	<div><p>Campoplex anatolus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977</p> <p>Figs. 7–8</p> <p>Campoplex anatolus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977: 76–77.</p> <p>Material examined. 1 female, Fujian, Jiangle Longqishan, 8.VII.1991, Liu Changming, No 969704; 1 female, Fujian, Jiangle Longqishan, 30.IX.1991, Liu Changming, No 20007360; 1 female, Fujian, Nanjing, 8.VII.1991, Liu Changming, No 20006264; 1 female, Fujian, Nanping, 22.IX.2002, Liu Jingxian, No 20025259; 4 females, Fujian, Wuyishan Huanggangshan, 14.VII.1994, Chen Xuexin, No 942697, 942699, 942675, 942693; 2 females, Fujian, Wuyishan Huanggangshan, 14.VII.1994, Ye Shufeng, No 943395, 943381, 943281; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Huangganshan, 17.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 943340; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Tongmu, 16.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 942904; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Xingcunzhen, 17.IV.2009, Tan Jiangli, No 201603235; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Xingcunzhen, 17.IV.2009, YPT, No 201605673; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 6.VIII.1983, He Junhua, No 832760; 1 female, Guangdong, Dawuling, 1.X.2001, Xu Zaifu, No 20020501; 1 female, Guangdong, Liuxihe Forest Park, 30.III.2003, Wang Yiping, No 20032563; 1 female, Guangdong, Yangchun Huatan, 3. V.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 20027762; 3 females, Guangxi, Jinxiu Dayaoshan, 12. VI.1982, He Junhua, No 822782, 822898, 823017; 1 female, 1 male, Guizhou, Daozhen Xiannvdong, 24.VIII.2004, Wei Shujun, No 201505839, 201405681; 4 females, 1 male, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, 18.VIII.2004, Wu Qiong, No 201506131, 201505681; 4 females, 1 male, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, 18.VIII.2004, Wu Qiong, No 201506131, 201505146, 201505144, 201504857, 201505043; 1 female, 3 males, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huguosi, 3.VIII.2001, 1300m, Piao Meihua, No 200108680, 200108681, 200108702, 200107716; 1 female, Henan, Ludai Shizifeng, 24.VII.1996, Cai Ping, No 973323; 1 female, Hubei, Wufeng Houhe, 1.VII.1999, Bo Wenjun, No 200104478; 1 male, Hubei, Shennongjia Qianjiaping, 26.VIII.1982, 1700m, He Junhua, No 825449; 3 females, Jilin, Changchun, 23.VII.1992, Lou Juxian, No 961037, 961049, 951060; 2 females, Jilin, Longtanshan, 21.VII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 961734, 961817; 1 female, Liaoning, Laotuding, 16.VII.2011, Song Shengnan, No 201103622; 1 female, Liaoning, Shenyang National Forest Park, 17.VII.2011, Yan Chengjin, No 201103536; 1 female, 1 male, Shaanxi, Qingling Tiantaishan, 4.IX.1999, Chen Xuexin, No 991284, 991260; 1 female, Shandong, Taian Taishan, 20.VII.1996, Xu Weian, No 971794; 1 female, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 26.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201208949; 2 females, 1 male, Sichuan, Daofu Luhuo, 15.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201407162, 201407194, 201407175; 1 female, 7 males, Xizang, Cangdu, 3.VII.2013, Liuzhen, No 201403810, 201403771, 201403763, 201403761, 201403800, 201403813, 201403826, 201403743; 1 female, Xizang, Naqu Naixian, 31.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201408816; 1 female, Xizang, Xiayadong, 19.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400797; 2 females, Yunnan, Lvchun Fenshuiling, 25.VII.2003, Jiang Qian, No 20045747, 20045735; 7 females, 1 male, Yunnan, Maguan Bazhaizhen, VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 201806816, 201806817, 201806869, 201807092, 201806620, 201807063,201806907,201806709; 7females, Yunnan, Maguan Bojiaozhen, 3.IX.2017, Malaise trap, No 201807423, 201807278, 201807264, 201807253, 201807216, 201807336, 201807344; 3 females, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 201806432, 201806522, 201806040; 2 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Anjishan, 21.VII.1995, Wu Hong, No 971279, 971564, 971081; 1 female, Zhejiang, Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, 1650m, Dai Wu, No 20058438; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 8.VII.2010, Dong Shuai; 1 female, Zhejiang, Linan Longtangshan, 29. V.2012, Tang Pu, No 201204821; 2females, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 9.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 200042330, 20042260; 1 female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 27.VII.2007, Liu Jingxian, No 201801007; 1 female, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 7.VIII.2003, Liu Jingxian, No 20055719; 1 female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 8.VIII.2003, 1933m, Ma Yun, No 20041444; 1 female, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 13.VII.2003, 1856m, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20058545; 1 female, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 18.VII.1994, Wu Hong, No 946822; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 18. V.1993, Chen Hanlin, No 964783; 4 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 1. V.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 20002476, 20002469, 20002491, 20002097; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 13. VI.1998, Chen Xuexin, No 980664; 6 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 25–27.VII.2011, Song Shengnan, No 201102373, 201102344, 201102350, 201102260, 201102062, 201101486, 201101552, 201101542; 8 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 1.VII.2001, Piao Meihua, 1520m, No 200105911, 200105632, 200105828, 200105240, 200105839, 200105456, 200105240, 200105839; 2 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Bingchuandashi, 28.VII.2011, Liu Zhen, No 201101581, 201101578; 4 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 27.VII.2011, Liu Zhen, No 201101363, 201101345, 201101354, 20110183, 201102479; 22 females, 18 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 20–21.VII.1987, Lou Xiaoming, No 873913, 873909, 873907, 873906, 873888, 873868, 873858, 873862, 873863, 873864, 873838, 873806, 873636, 873652, 873790, 873887, 873885, 873878, 873876, 873870, 873895, 873875, 873916, 873914, 874386, 874378, 874340, 874337, 874143, 874108, 874153, 874158, 874302, 874319, 874320, 874321, 874323, 874332, 874333, 874335; 1 female, 2 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Wang Beigeng, No 876455, 876630, 876594; 4 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 13. VI.1983, Ma Yun, No 830898, 830883, 830877, 830858; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 23. VI.1984, No 841886; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. V.1988, He Junhua, No 881073; 52 females, 15 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, VI.1984 – VI.1989, Chen Xuexin, No 872306, 877127, 872776, 878576, 872774, 872769, 872578, 872453, 872473, 872571, 830898, 830883, 830858, 830877, 876594, 876630, 872604, 872601, 877246, 877181, 872420, 872427, 872747, 872741, 872718, 872765, 872762, 872759, 872757, 872729, 972719, 872703, 872413, 872626, 873364, 872998, 873000, 873004, 873308, 872608, 872588, 872572, 872707, 872724, 872406, 872787, 872790, 872992, 872349, 873391, 873395, 842305, 842296, 872632, 873322, 873433, 873422, 845627, 873374, 873404, 873413, 873412, 873419, 891250, 891357, 891705, 891686, 891690, 891758, 882070, 882074, 882067, 891672; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 28.VII.2003, Chen Xuexin, No 20038983; 5 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, V.1988 – VI.1990, He Junhua, No 881072, 904410, 890337, 890341, 890349; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 11. VI.1993, Chen Xuexin, No 934921; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 25.VII.2011, No 201500541, 201501021; 4 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, VI.1989, No 892788, 892817, 892764, 892749; 62 females, 11 males, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, V.1995 – VIII.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 997178, 997183, 997023, 997142, 200010898, 992589, 994017, 994010, 994086, 994108, 994057, 992093, 992094, 992091, 995677, 994357, 995352, 992053, 992064, 996756, 992427, 992357, 995415, 992029, 992038, 992042, 992060, 992057, 992106, 992108, 20000792, 994039, 995403, 995735, 995380, 995381, 995409, 995431, 995546, 995553, 995560, 995563, 995784, 995565, 995564, 995573, 995574, 995577, 995670, 995674, 995354, 995776, 995791, 995793, 995795, 995801, 995828, 995707, 995705, 995683, 995699, 995681, 995691, 995679, 995697, 995722, 995718, 995726, 995729, 997149, 997167, 997157, 20003465; 3 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 18.VIII.1999, Ma Yun, No 997472, 997450, 997363; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 27.IV.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 999634; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 30.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20040770; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 27.VII.2003, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20038279; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 18.VIII.1999, Yang Yafen, No 997713; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 3.VII.2000, Li Weidi, No 200010417; 1female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 30.VII.2003, Shi Min, No 20040656; 9 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 17. V.1999, Fan Jinjiang, No 884261, 884248, 884282, 882245, 884247, 884240, 884256, 884311, 884087; 2 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 29.VII.1984, Guan Xiaojing, No 844465, 844334; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 6. VI.1989, Wang Beigeng, No 892783; 7 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, VI.1990, Lou Yonggen, No 900099, 900693, 900733, 900861, 900407, 900423, 900402; 5 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 17. V.1988, Xu Weiliang, No 885647, 885742, 885872, 885628, 885919, 885578; 2 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 18.VI.1983, 2.VI.1990, Shi Zuhua, No 901859, 830420; 7 females, 2 males, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 17. V.1988, Lou Xiaoming, No 883126, 883116, 883104, 883131, 883141, 883660, 883662, 892421, 892426; 3 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 2–4. VI.1990, Wang Beigeng, No 903274, 903161, 903270; 5 females, 4 males, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 16. V.1988, No 882803, 882796, 882755, 882791, 882962, 882739, 882721, 882899, 882666; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 2.VII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200103516; 3 females, Xitianmushan, 2. VI.1990, Hu Haijun, No 901107, 901065, 901240; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 6. VI.1989, No 894934; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 29.VII.1984, Qian Ying, No 842965; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 10.IX.1983, Xu Zhihong, No 833710; 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 30.VII.2003, Shi Min, No 20040719.</p> <p>Variation. Antenna with 32–35 flagellomeres; malar space 0.3–0.6× basal width of mandible; interocellar distance (Fig. 8F) 1.4–1.7× ocello-ocular distance and 1.6–2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli; mesopleuron (Fig. 8B) granulose to granulose-punctate; hind femur 5.0–5.4× longer than wide; first tergite (Fig. 8H) 3.0–3.3× longer than width of postpetiole; ovipositor sheath 1.7–2.1× longer than hind femur; one specimen from Shenyang province with hind femur black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Henan, Hubei, Jilin, Liaoning, Shaanxi, Shandong, Shanxi, Sichuan, Taiwan, Xizang, Yunnan, Zhejiang); India, Myanmar, Nepal.</p> <p>Note. This species is reported from Taiwan (China) before, and this study indicated it is a widely distributed species in China.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147736C389DD11A20085D79DC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1476F6C3F9DD11ED50B827E20.text	039687B1476F6C3F9DD11ED50B827E20.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex angustaulacis Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex angustaulacis sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 9–10</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Shandong, Wendeng, XI.1985 – VI.1988, Hou Shaojin, No 863867 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Anhui, Yuexi, 15.X.1981, Yang Fan, No 820649; 1 female, Fujian, Dehua Chishuizhen, 13.IX.2002, 1000m, Xu Zaifu, No 20025087; 1 female, Fujian, Dehua Daiyunshan, 15.IX.2002, 1000m, Li Fangfang, No 20025314; 1 female, Fujian, Meihuashan, 23–24.VII.1988, He Junhua, No 887364; 1 female, Fujian, Sangang, 7.X.1991, Chen Xuexin, No 920016; 1 female, Fujian, Sangang, 8.X.1985, Wang Jiashe, No 854451; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Tongmu, 2–8.VIII.1983, He Junhua, No 832436; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 22.VII.1986, Wang Jiashe, No 870790; 1 female, Fujian, Shenzhou, X.1989, Wu Zhishan, No 20009631; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 18.IV.2009, Zeng Jie, No 201605335; 2 females, Guangxi, Jingang Dayaoshan, 14. VI.1982, He Junhua, No 822880, 823038; 1 female, Guangxi, Lipu, 17. VI.1982, He Junhua, No 823117; 2 females, Guangxi, Tianlin Langpin, 28. V.1982, No 821775, 822020; 1 female, Guizhou, Dashahe, 1615– 1356m, 18.VIII.2004, Wei Shujun, No 201501902; 24 females, Guizhou, Duyun, V.1985, Liu Zhibang, No 850929, 850928, 850927, 850941, 850925, 850926, 850952, 850953, 850956, 850931, 850933, 850935, 850948, 850930, 850959, 850951, 850924, 850853, 850905, 850923, 850922, 850921, 850419, 850915, 861288, 861280, 861285, 861286; 1 female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 1. V.1981, Luo Qinghuai, No 814280; 1 female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 2. V.1983, Luo Qinghuai, No 850293; 1 female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 30.VIII.1987, He Junhua, No 878146; 2 females, Guizhou, Guiyang, VI.1982, Song Xuepei, No 834951; 3 females, Guizhou, Huishui, IX–X.1986, Chu Jiming, No 864493; 3 females, Guizhou, Meitan, V.1982, Xia Huaien, No 860685, 860686, 860687; 1 female, Hebei, Handan, VI.1978, Ma Zhongshi, No 790599; 1 female, Heilongjiang, 20. V.1979, Zhang Runsheng, Host: Laspeyresia zebeana, Zhang Runsheng, No 810375; 7 females, Heilongjiang, Heihe, Wan Li, No 810343 (7); 1 female, Jilin, Changchun, 4.IX.1985, Yan Hui, No 861283; 2 females, Jilin, Changchun, 25.VII.1985, Li Zhaofen, No 861279, 861292; 1 female, Jilin, Jiutai, 19. VI.1980, Liu Xiaoyu, No 861293; 1 female, Jilin, Jinyue, 11.X.1985, Li Zhaofen, No 861287; 1 female, Jilin, Songhuahu, IX–X.1985, Tang Minghe, No 860014; 1 female, Jiangsu, Sushui, 8.IV.1984, Qian Fanjun, Host: Dendrolimus sp., No 853210; 1 female, Jiangxi, Jiujiang, 17.III.1981, Peng Guohuang, No 810359; 1 female, Jiangxi, Lushan, 10–12.VIII.1982, He Junhua, No 825210; 2 females, Liaoning, Tieceng, 1.IX.1974, Host: Dendrolimus sp., Zhou Jiazhi, No 772210, 791154; 125 females, Shandong, Wendeng, XI.1985 – VI.1988, Hou Shaojin, No 862063, 863864, 864705, 863873, 863874, 862080, 863870, 863871, 863872, 863885, 863882, 863881, 863880, 862079, 862076, 862073, 861757, 862064, 862081, 861758, 862072, 861760, 861756, 861755, 886952, 861759, 862071, 862070, 862069, 862068, 862067, 862065, 888743, 888742, 886954, 886918, 888724, 888727, 875001, 875006, 874989, 874990, 861764, 861996, 888718, 881440, 878931, 875005, 861763, 875019, 888960, 888947, 875000, 875008, 875013, 878926, 878927, 878929, 878932, 878933, 878934, 878936, 878937, 874997, 874998, 874999, 854178, 853624, 853625, 864626, 864689, 864687, 853629, 864686, 864715, 864713, 864706, 864701, 864690, 864712, 864711, 864710, 864709, 864702, 863888, 864887, 864703, 864685, 878914, 863866, 863868, 863869, 878921, 878920, 878938, 878924, 878940, 878939, 863865, 878925, 863878, 888749, 863877, 863889, 864718, 864719, 864722, 863875, 863876, 864720, 864720, 864921,8889494, 881444, 863879, 888752, 888740, 888730, 881443, 881442, 881441, 881434, 881433, 881424, 881423, 881426; 1 female, Shandong, Wendeng, 26. VI.1988, Wang Liwen, No 886933; 2 females, Shandong, Wendeng, 1.VII.1988, Hou Xinpin, No 886927, 886944; 10 females, Shandong, Yantai, 1987, Hou Shaojin, No 871518, 871314, 871313, 871311, 871309, 871304, 871295, 871303, 871294, 871312; 1 female, Sichuan, Chengdu, 1979, He Rongrong, No 810623; 1 female, Sichuan, Rongjing, 1980, Xie Daben, No 813568; 2 females, Zhejiang, Deqing Fatou, 27. V.1995, He Junhua, No 954304, 954305; 1 female, Zhejiang, Fengyangshan, 26.VII.2007, Liu Jingxian, No 201891370; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 9.VII.1982, Xu Houliang, No 923169; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, VII.1986, He Junhua, No 862020; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 28. VI.1989, He Junhua, No 893608; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, IV.1990, Rong Luqi, No 900078; 1 female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 9.VIII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20042298; 1 female, Zhejiang, Putuoshan, 4. VI.1975, He Junhua, No 760513; 3 females, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 3.XI.1993, Wu Hong, No 946428, 946444, 946428; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang Baimashan, 8.IV.1994, Chen Hanlin, No 941513; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang, 1980, Chen Hanlin, No 810141; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 19.VII.1986, Chen Hanlin, No 870529; 1 female, Zhejiang, Sanmen, 1980, Xie Baoyu, No 810059; 1 female, Zhejiang, Taishun Wuyanling, 28.VII–VIII.5.2005, Liu Jingxian, No 200610371; 1 female, Zhejiang Taizhou, V.1982, No 822293; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 28. VI.1983, Zhao Lin, No 840256; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 28. VI.1983, Zhaolin, No 840256; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 2–4. VI.1990, He Junhua, No 904382.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 9) holotype. Body length 7.3 mm, fore wing length 4.8 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 40 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.5× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 10E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 10E) granulose with sparse punctures, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated. Malar space granulose, 0.45× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 10F) 1.7× ocello-ocular distance and 2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose with sparse punctures dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 10G) granulose punctate, rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose-punctate. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 10B) granulose-punctate, becoming rugose above mesopleural fovea, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 10C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia area confluent with area petiolaris, deeply depressed medially; area petiolaris trans-striate medially; median carina absent under costula, present posteriorly; latero-longitudinal carina weakly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 10A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 5.3× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 10H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 3.2× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.86× as long as first tergite, 1.8× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.5× its diameter. Third tergite 1.3× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.6× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 10D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, yellowish brown; scape and pedicel brown; fore and mid legs yellowish brown with coxa brown; hind leg with coxa and trochanter black, trochantellus and tibia medially yellowish brown, femur blackish brown, remainder of hind leg brown; metasoma with second tergite apically and from third tergite on laterally brown, remainder of metasoma black.</p> <p>Variation. Antenna with 34–40 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3–1.5× longer than second flagellomere; malar space 0.3–0.45× basal width of mandible; interocellar distance 1.3–1.7× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7–2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli; hind femur 4.4–5.3× longer than wide; first tergite 3.0–3.2× longer than width of postpetiole; second tergite 0.8–0.9× as long as first tergite, 1.5–1.8× longer than its apical width; third tergite 0.9–1.3× longer than its apical width; ovipositor sheath 1.5–1.7× longer than hind femur.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Anhui, Fujian, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hebei, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Liaoning, Shandong, Sichuan, Zhejiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. oriens Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having interocellar distance 2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli, mesopleuron granulose-punctate, propodeal median area deeply depressed, fore and mid legs with coxae brown, and hind femur blackish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “angustus” (Latin for “narrow”) and “aulacis” (Latin for “furrow”), because its propodeal median area has a narrow groove.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1476F6C3F9DD11ED50B827E20	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1476A6C3E9DD11AE80ACD7D8A.text	039687B1476A6C3E9DD11AE80ACD7D8A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex apacicarinatus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex apacicarinatus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 11–12</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Hubei, Shennongjia Qianjiaping, 21.V.2012, Shi Kai, No 201204457 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 11) holotype. Body length 5.8 mm, fore wing length 4.1 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 30 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.1× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 12E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 12E) mat, slightly convex, apical margin slightly arched, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.45× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 12F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 1.8× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 12G) granulose, rugose in notaulic area anteriorly. Scutellum and metanotum granulose with scutellum rugose posteriorly. Mesopleuron (Fig. 12B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum largely granulose, smooth and shiny medially. Metapleuron granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 12C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, broadly and shallowly depressed, granulose; median and lateral longitudinal carinae obscure; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 12A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.3× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate basally.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 12H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove shallow. First tergite 2.6× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.65× as long as first tergite, 1.1× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.7× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 12D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible medially, palpi and tegula, yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore and mid legs coxae and telotarsus brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg with coxa, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia extreme basally and apically, and tarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Hubei).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. kamathi Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having face granulose, interocellar distance 1.5× ocello-ocular distance, medio-longitudinal carina obscure, median depressed area not striate, first metasomal segment with dorsolateral carina and lateral groove present, and body color different.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “apacus” (Latin for “obscure”) and “carina” (Latin for “carina”), because its propodeal median and lateral longitudinal carinae are weakly developed.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1476A6C3E9DD11AE80ACD7D8A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147656C329DD11ED508907E20.text	039687B147656C329DD11ED508907E20.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex artivultus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex artivultus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 13–14</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, 18.VIII.2001, Wu Qiong, No 201505125 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 2 females, Sichuan, Emeishan, 11.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 802364, 802372; 1 female, Yunnan, Maguan Bazhaizhen, VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 201807023; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 4.IX.1987, Chen Xuexin, No 877203, 877171; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Fan Jinjiang, No 875511, 875691; 1 female, Zhejiang Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Wang Beigeng, No 876443; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 20.VII.1987, Lou Xiaoming, No 873835; 2 females, 2 males, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 16.VIII.1998, Zhao Mingshui, No 994341, 994361, 994883, 20000928.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 13) holotype. Body length 6.7 mm, fore wing length 4.5 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 34 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 14E) granulose, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 14E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin blunt, almost truncated. Malar space shiny, 0.3× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth longer than the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 14F) 1.0× ocelloocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 14G) granulose. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 14B) granulose, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 14B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 14C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose-rugulose, subpolished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; latero-longitudinal carina weakly developed; propodeal spiracle small and nearly round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 14A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.2.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.9× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 14H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 3.7× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 1.8× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its diameter. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 0.9× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 14D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth and tegula yellowish brown; palpi yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa brown; mid leg with coxa, trochanter and trochantellus externally, basal 0.7 of femur and telotarsus blackish brown, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind leg with extreme base of femur yellowish brown, tibia medially whitish yellow, remainder of hind leg black; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Variation. Antenna with 33–36 flagellomeres; interocellar distance 1.3–2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli; fore wing areolet with stalk short to moderately long; ovipositor sheath approx. 0.9–1.2× longer than hind femur; mid femur entirely yellowish brown or black basally.</p> <p>Male. Essentially similar to female except propodeal carina stronger, mid leg whitish yellow except femur basal-ventrally and coxa brown.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Guizhou, Sichuan, Yunnan, Zhejiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. maximalus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having malar space 0.3× basal width of mandible, medio-longitudinal carina moderately developed, areolet equal to the length of stalk, nervellus intercepted at lower 0.2, and first metasomal segment with a strong lateral carina.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “artus” (Latin for “narrow”) and “vultus” (Latin for “face”), refer to its comparatively narrow face.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147656C329DD11ED508907E20	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147676C359DD11AE808CD7925.text	039687B147676C359DD11AE808CD7925.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex atricrus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex atricrus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 15–16</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Xinjiang, Hongjialike, 10.VII.1992, He Junhua, No 914155 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, 3 males, Xinjiang, Hongjialike, 10.VII.1992, He Junhua, No 914128, 914125, 914142, 914126.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 15) holotype. Body length 3.6 mm, fore wing length 3.1 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 25 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 16E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 16E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated, blunt. Malar space granulose, 0.7× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 16F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 1.8× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, slightly swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum rugulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 16G) granulose, notauli absent. Scutellum granulose and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 16B) rugose-punctate dorsally, granulose-punctate ventrally, trans-striate below tegula, speculum rugose. Metapleuron (Fig. 16B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 16C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose, mat; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 16A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus vertical, intercepted at lower 0.3.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.5× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.57× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws slightly pectinate basally, its teeth weak.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 16H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 2.2× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.8× as long as first tergite, equal to its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.7× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.0× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 16D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth yellowish brown; palpi brown; tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel black; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa, trochanter, femur basal-ventrally and telotarsus blackish brown; mid leg black except trochantellus and tibia medially yellowish brown; hind leg black except trochantellus apically, femur extreme basally and tibia medially yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Variation. Pronotum granulose to rugulose-punctate, mesopleuron granulose-punctate to rugose-punctate, propodeal area petiolaris rugose to trans-striate, lateral carina present or absent.</p> <p>Male. Propodeal area superomedia narrow, area superomedia rugulose; otherwise similar to female.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Xinjiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. granulosus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having apical margin of clypeus slightly arched, malar space 0.7× basal width of mandible base, pronotum rugulosepunctate dorsally, mesopleuron rugose-punctate dorsally, mid leg and hind leg largely black, and metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “atrum” (Latin for “black”) and “crus” (Latin for “leg”), because its mid and hind legs are largely black.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147676C359DD11AE808CD7925	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147626C099DD11ED50DFE79F9.text	039687B147626C099DD11ED50DFE79F9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex collucatus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex collucatus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 17–18</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Shaanxi, Qingling, 8.VI.1998, Ma Yun, No 983546 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 17) holotype. Body length 8.0 mm, fore wing length 5.1 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 33 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.15× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 18E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 18E) finely granulose, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated, blunt. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella present basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 18F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 18G) granulose, becoming rugose in notaulic area. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 18B) granulose with small punctures, punctures denser in low half, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 18B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 18C) granulose, with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris granulose medially and rugose laterally; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, moderately depressed; medio-longitudinal carina weak under costula, gradually strong apically; latero-longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 18A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.1× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite of M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 5.5× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 18H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 3.3× longer than width of postpetiole. Metasoma entirely granulose except petiole. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 2.4× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× of its length. From third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.3× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 18D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, scape and pedicel brown; palpi and tegula yellowish brown; fore and mid legs except coxae and telotarsus brown; hind leg coxa black, trochanter, extreme base of tibia and each tarsal segment apically brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma from third tergites on laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Shaanxi).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. multicinctus Gravenhorst, 1829, but differs from the latter by having fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part, first metasomal segment shorter than hind femur, third tergite 2.0× longer than its apical width, and mandible brown except teeth.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “collucatus” (Latin for “thin”), because this species looks thin.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147626C099DD11ED50DFE79F9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1475C6C089DD11D900C2E7CB3.text	039687B1475C6C089DD11D900C2E7CB3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex concretus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex concretus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 19–20</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, 18.VIII.2004, Wu Qiong, No 201505028 (ZJUH). Paratype: 1 male, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, No 201503196.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 19) holotype. Body length 5.7 mm, fore wing length 4.3 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.1× length of second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 20E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 20E) sparsely punctate, polished, slightly convex, apical margin slightly curved. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella. Frons granulose-punctate, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 20F) 1.8× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina before mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 20G) granulose-punctate, rugose on notaulic area anteriorly. Scutellum punctate, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 20B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 20C) smooth and compact; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia nearly smooth, shiny, with few small punctures; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed medially; all carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 20A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.7× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.1 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.1× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws strongly pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 20H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove very weak. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, subpolished. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.8× as long as its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Third tergite 0.55× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.8× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 20D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi, yellowish brown; tegula yellow; scape and pedicel brown; fore and mid coxae and apical tarsal segments brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg coxa and trochanter blackish brown, tarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma black with second and third tergites somewhat blackish brown basally.</p> <p>Male. Essentially same as female.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Guizhou).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. hei sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having pronotum punctate dorsally, metanotum rugose-punctate, propodeal carina strongly developed, thyridium away from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter, and metasoma with second and third tergites somewhat blackish brown basally.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “concretus” (Latin for “thick”), because its propodeum is compact.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1475C6C089DD11D900C2E7CB3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1475F6C0C9DD11ED50BD9799E.text	039687B1475F6C0C9DD11ED50BD9799E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex confluentus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex confluentus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 21–22</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Liaoning, Shenyang, VI–VII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 961003 (ZJUH). Paratype: female, Liaoning, Shenyang, VI–VII.1995, Lou Juxian, No961043.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 21) holotype. Body length 5.1 mm, fore wing length 4.3 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with at least 25 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.25× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 22E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 22E) granulose with sparse punctures, slightly convex, apical margin slightly arched. Malar space granulose, 0.55× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 22F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose with sparse punctures dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 22G) granulose punctate. Scutellum granulose-punctate. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 22B) granulosepunctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 22B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 22C) granulose; area basalis confluent with area superomedia; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris; area petiolaris granulose-rugulose; all carina very weakly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 22A) areolet absent. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.2× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (65°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 5.3× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 22H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove absent. First tergite 2.6× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.0× as long as its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.8× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.0× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 22D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, whitish yellow; scape and pedicel yellowish brown; fore and mid legs with coxa, trochanter and trochantellus whitish yellow, mid leg coxa basally weakly brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg coxa and trochanter black, trochantellus whitish-yellow, femur yellowish brown, tibia whitish yellow with apically infuscated, tarsus from basal 0.8 on brown, basal 0.8 yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Variation. Interocellar distance 1.2–1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli; propodeal lateral carina absent to very weak; hind femur 5.3–5.7× longer than wide.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Liaoning).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. assosae Kittel, 2016, but differs from the latter by having interocellar distance 1.2× ocello-ocular distance, propodeal area basalis confluent with area superomedia, area petiolaris granulose-rugulose, hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, fore and mid legs coxa whitish yellow, and hind trochanter blackish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “confluus” (Latin for “confluent”), because its propodeal area basalis, area superomedia area and area petiolaris are confluent.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1475F6C0C9DD11ED50BD9799E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147596C0F9DD11A7A0C5D7DB1.text	039687B147596C0F9DD11A7A0C5D7DB1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex cyclus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex cyclus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 23–24</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Xinjiang, Lugexian Shuikuxiang, 11.VIII.2002, Hu Hongying, No 20037129 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 23) holotype. Body length 4.8 mm, fore wing length 3.5 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with at least 14 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.35× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 24E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 24E) mat, not convex, apical margin truncated, sharp. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, with upper tooth longer than lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 24F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple swollen behind eye, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally with minute punctures, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 24G) and scutellum granulose-punctate. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 24B) granulose-punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron granulose with sparse punctures. Propodeum (Fig. 24C) granulose; area basalis triangular; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed medially; all carina strong; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 24A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.2 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.48× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 24H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, as long as its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.6× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.5× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 24D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, fore, mid and hind trochantellus, yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; coxae blackish brown; remainder of fore leg yellowish brown with apical tarsus brown; mid trochanter, femur, apical of tibia and apical tarsus brownish, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind trochanter, femur, subbase and apex of tibia and tarsus from basal tarsi 0.5 on blackish brown, with tibia medially and basal tarsi 0.5 yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Xinjiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. lobatus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having apical margin of clypeus not thick medially, mesopleuron granulose-punctate, propodeal area superomedia granulose, latero-longitudinal carina strongly developed, vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS, second metasomal tergite as long as its apical width, and metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “cyclus” (Latin for “circle”), because its head is round in anterior view.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147596C0F9DD11A7A0C5D7DB1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147546C039DD11ED50B267924.text	039687B147546C039DD11ED50B267924.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex densipunctatus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex densipunctatus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 25–26</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, VI.1983, Shi Zuhua, No 830388 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 25) holotype. Body length 6.0 mm, fore wing length 4.5mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 26E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 26E) with minute punctures, mat, slightly convex, apical margin widely arched, slightly thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.7× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 26F) 1.75× ocello-ocular distance and 2.3× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, polished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 26G), scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 26B) granulose-punctate, punctures dense and separated less than their diameter, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron punctate, punctures sparser than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 26C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 26A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.7× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 26H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.5× length of width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.8× as long as first tergite, 1.3× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its diameter. Third tergite as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.5× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 26D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, scape and pedicel in front, fore and mid legs entirely and tegula, yellow with femora and tibiae orange yellow; hind coxa black, trochanter blackish brown, trochantellus, femur and tibia yellowish brown, tibia infuscated at base and apex, tarsus brown; first metasomal segment entirely, second tergite entirely, third tergite except laterally, and remainder tergites dorso-medially, black; lateral surface of metasoma from third tergite on yellowish brown.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Zhejiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. manaliensis Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having mesopleuron densely punctate, metapleuron punctate, median longitudinal and lateral longitudinal carinae distinctly developed, pronotum shiny dorsally, and lateral surface of metasoma from third tergite on yellowish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “densus” (Latin for “dense”) and “punctatus” (Latin for “punctate”), because its mesopleuron is densely punctate.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147546C039DD11ED50B267924	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147566C029DD11DEC08FD7BD4.text	039687B147566C029DD11DEC08FD7BD4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex exareola Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex exareola sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 27–28</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Jilin, Changbaishan, 4.VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No 951985 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 27) holotype. Body length 4.5 mm, fore wing length 3.6 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 24 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.25× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 28E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 28E) granulose, not convex, apical margin slightly arched and thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.65× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 28F) 1.3× ocello-ocular distance and 1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 28G) granulose, notauli absent. Scutellum granulose with sparse and minute punctures. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 28B) granulose with sparse and minute punctures, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 28B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 28C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia finely granulose, subpolished; area petiolaris weakly rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; costula absent; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 28A) areolet absent. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.25.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.6× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate basally, teeth very weak.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 28H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 1.1× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Third tergite 0.7× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.0× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 28D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; all trochantellus yellow; fore leg from trochantellus on yellowish brown, coxa, trochanter and telotarsus blackish brown; mid leg with extreme base of femur, tibia media-externally and basal 0.5 of tarsus yellow, remainder of mid leg brown; hind leg with base and middle of tibia and basal 0.5 of tarsus whitish yellow, remainder of hind leg black; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Jilin).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. maurotrochanter sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having area petiolaris weakly rugose, propodeal median area slightly depressed, fore wing areolet absent, mid leg largely brown, and metasoma from third tergite on not compressed.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “ex-” (Latin for “out of”) and “areola” (Latin for “small open space”), because its fore wing is without areolet.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147566C029DD11DEC08FD7BD4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147516C069DD11ED508F17941.text	039687B147516C069DD11ED508F17941.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex granalvus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex granalvus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 29–30</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Jilin, VII.1976, Zeng Haifeng, Host: Laspeyresia zebeana, No 760504 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 2 females, Heilongjiang, Heihe, Wan Li, No 810343 (2); 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 23.IV.1987, Ma Yun, No 810433.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 29) holotype. Body length 6.3 mm, fore wing length 4.5 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 31 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.1× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 30E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 30E) punctate, slightly convex, apical margin widely arched. Malar space granulose, 0.55× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella present basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 30F) 1.7× ocello-ocular distance and 1.9× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 30G) granulose punctate. Scutellum and metanotum granulose, scutellum with minute punctures. Mesopleuron (Fig. 30B) granulose-punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 30B) punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 30C) with area basalis rectangular; area superomedia granulose-rugulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 30A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.5× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a distad of M&amp;RS by 0.3 of its length. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.6× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, teeth very weak.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 30H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina, lateral groove present but weak. First tergite 2.6× longer than width of postpetiole. Metasoma entirely granulose. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.8× as long as its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 0.6× of its length. Third tergite 0.7× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 30D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible blackish brown basally, reddish brown apically, yellowish brown medially; tegula, scape and pedicel blackish brown; palpi yellowish brown; fore and mid coxae, trochanters, trochantellus and telotarsus brownish, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind coxa, trochanter and trochantellus blackish brown, femur reddish brown except infuscated basally and apically, tibia yellowish brown except infuscated basally and apically, tarsus blackish brown.</p> <p>Variation. Pronotum granulose to granulose-punctate dorsally; propodeal area basalis trapezoid to rectangular; propodeal spiracle round to oval; first tergite 2.6–2.9× longer than width of postpetiole.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Heilongjiang, Jilin, Zhejiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. anatolus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having mesopleuron granulose-punctate, vein 1cu-a distad of M&amp;RS by 0.3 of its length, propodeal carinae stronger, metasoma entirely granulose, and tegula blackish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “granum” (Latin for “seed”) and “alvus” (Latin for “metasoma”), because its metasoma is entirely granulose.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147516C069DD11ED508F17941	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147536C199DD11DC80A147860.text	039687B147536C199DD11DC80A147860.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex grandialphus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex grandialphus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 31–32</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Jilin, Tonghua, 1.VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No 976691 (ZJUH). Paratype: female, Jilin, Tonghua, 1.VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No976660.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 31) holotype. Body length 6.8 mm, fore wing length 4.5 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with at least 33 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.1× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 32E) strongly granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 32E) granulose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 32F) 2.1× ocello-ocular distance and 1.9× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina gradually narrow dorsally.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 32G) granulosepunctate, becoming rugose in notaulic area. Scutellum granulose with posterior rugose. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 32B) granulose-punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 32C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, moderately depressed medially; all carina moderately developed; propodeal spiracle small and round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 32A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus intercepted above the middle.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.1× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 32H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, lateral carina and lateral groove almost absent. Postpetiole and second tergite finely granulose. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.3× longer than its apical width; thyridium large, its distance from basal margin of tergite 0.8× its length. Third tergite slightly shorter than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.7× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 32D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, scape and pedicel black; palpi and tegula yellowish brown; fore leg from coxa on yellowish brown except telotarsus brown, coxa black; mid leg from trochantellus on yellowish brown except telotarsus brown, coxa black, trochanter and trochantellus blackish brown; hind coxa, trochanter and trochantellus black, femur reddish brown, tibia yellowish brown except basally and apically brown, tarsus brown with telotarsus darker; metasoma black.</p> <p>Variation. Occipital carina evenly arched or gradually narrow dorsally; mesoscutum becoming rugose or not in notaulic area; hind wing with nervellus intercepted above the middle or at lower 0.4.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Jilin).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. anatolus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having apical margin arched, interocellar distance 2.1× ocellar-ocular distance, metapleuron granulose-punctate, nervellus broken above the middle, thyridium large, mandible except teeth black, and mid leg trochanter and trochantellus blackish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “grandis” (Latin for “large”) and “alphus” (Latin for “spot”), because its thyridium is large as compared to other species in this genus.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147536C199DD11DC80A147860	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1474E6C1D9DD11ED508897941.text	039687B1474E6C1D9DD11ED508897941.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex grandicella Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex grandicella sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 33–34</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Xizang, Xiayadong, 19.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400874 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 33) holotype. Body length 5.0 mm, fore wing length 3.7 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 31 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 34E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 34E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin arched, blunt. Face and clypeus combined equal to minimum width of face. Malar space granulose, 0.8× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 34F) 1.0× ocello-ocular distance and 1.6× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple nearly smooth, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 34G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 34B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 34B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 34C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, trans-striate, slightly depressed; medio-longitudinal carina very weak; latero-longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle small and round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 34A) areolet present and without stalk, emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.7× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.35.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.57× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 34H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina anteriorly and without lateral groove. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, finely granulose on subsequent tergites, subpolished. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.3× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Third tergite as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with weak emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.3× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 34D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore coxa basally, dorsal surface of tibia and tarsus brown, trochanter and trochantellus yellow, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown; mid coxa basally, femur dorsally, tibia basally and apically, and tarsus brown, trochanter and trochantellus yellow, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind coxa black, trochanter, trochantellus basally, femur, tibia basally and apically and tarsus blackish brown, trochantellus apically and tibia medially yellowish brown; metasoma from third tergite on yellowish brown laterally.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Xizang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. pseudocollinus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having face and clypeus combined equal to minimum width of face, malar space granulose, 0.8× basal width of mandible, propodeal area superomedia trans-rugose, fore wing areolet large and without stalk, hind wing with nervellus inclivous, and body color different.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “grandis” (Latin for “large”) and “cella” (Latin for “cell”), because its fore wing areolet is large.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1474E6C1D9DD11ED508897941	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147486C1E9DD11DC809C77BA9.text	039687B147486C1E9DD11DC809C77BA9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex granulosus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex granulosus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 35–36</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Xinjiang, Kuchewuqia, 2.IX.2004, Tu Erxun, No 20060145 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Hubei, Shennongjia, 27.VIII.1982, He Junhua, No 825746; 4 females, 3 males, Jilin, Dongliao, 17. VI.1988, Zhao Mingcheng, host: pupa of Coleophora dahurica, No 883937 (4), 883936 (3); 1 male, Jilin, Dongliao, 17.VII.1988, Nie Shenglong, No 860159; 1 male, Jilin, Tonghua, 1.VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No 976672; 1 female, Neimeng, Baotou Wudangzhao, 21.VIII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200100557; 1 female, Shandong, Bowen, 6.IX.1984, No 879198; 1 female, Xinjiang, Afanti Duolangxiang, 31.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601193; 1 female, 1male, Xinjiang, Badan Kuerli, 8.VIII.2001, Hu Hongying, No 20036790, 20036821; 1 female, Xinjiang, Bazhou, IX.1983, Song Meijie, No 833962; 1 female, Xinjiang, Fukang Jiuyunjie, 17.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200600762; 1 female, Xinjiang, Hetian Moyutuohula, 30.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601145; 1 female, Xinjiang, Kuerle Awatixiang, 3.IX.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601415; 1 female, Xinjiang, Maigaiti, 27.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200600937; 1 female, Xinjiang, Shachexian, 19.VII.1991, He Junhua, No 912987, 913031, 912991; 1 female, Xinjiang, Shule, Tazihongxiang, 26.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200600908; 4 females, 2 males, Xinjiang, Wulumuqi, 26.VIII.1987, Ma Qi, No 880068, 880128, 880133, 880136, 880129, 880130; 3 females, 2 males, Xinjiang, Wulumuqi, 3.VIII.2001, Hu Hongying, No 20036042, 20036031, 20036014, 20036022, 20036027; 1 female, Xinjiang, Yuli Talimuxiang, 4.IX.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601451.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 35) holotype. Body length 4.3 mm, fore wing length 3.5 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 24 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 36E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 36E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin truncated, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 36F) 1.5× ocelloocular distance and 1.8× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 36G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 36B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 36B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 36C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose, mat; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 36A) without areolet. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.1× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus vertical, intercepted at lower 0.25.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.55× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 36H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, equal to its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Third tergite 0.9× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 36D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, yellow; scape and pedicel brown; tegula whitish; fore and mid trochanter and trochantellus whitish yellow, telotarsus brownish; remainder of fore and mid legs orange yellow; hind coxa black, trochanter basally blackish brown, femur and tibia yellowish brown, extreme apex of femur infuscated, tibia infuscated subbasally and apically, tarsus blackish brown except basal 0.8 yellowish brown; first metasomal segment entirely black; second tergite except apical laterally, third tergite except apically, fourth to seventh segments except laterally, blackish brown; remainder of metasoma reddish brown.</p> <p>Variation. Antenna with 24–26 flagellomeres, fore wing areolet absent or present and with 3rs-m vein incomplete, length of second tergite of metasoma 1.0–1.6× its apical width, scape and pedicel yellowish brown to blackish brown.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Hubei, Jilin, Neimenggu, Shandong, Xinjiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. lobatus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere 1.2× longer than second flagellomere, mesopleuron granulose, thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by 1.5× its diameter, mid and hind leg largely yellowish brown, and metasoma colour different.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “granosus” (Latin for “granular”), because its body sculpture is largely granulose.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147486C1E9DD11DC809C77BA9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1474B6C109DD11C60086C7E20.text	039687B1474B6C109DD11C60086C7E20.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex galbipedis Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex galbipedis sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 37–38</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Nangaofeng, 5.VII.2003, Chen Xuexin, No 20056130 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 37) holotype. Body length 6.8 mm, fore wing length 4.2 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 33 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 38E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 38E) granulose punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched, blunt. Malar space granulose, 0.3× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, with upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 38F) 1.3× ocello-ocular distance and 1.6× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple not swollen behind eye, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally with minute punctures, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 38G) granulose, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose, becoming rugose posteriorly. Metanotum granulose-rugose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 38B) granulose-punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 38C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia rugulose; area petiolaris transstriate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed medially; all carina strong; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 38A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (65°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.25 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.8× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 38H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.8× as long as first tergite, 1.8× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its length. Third tergite length equal to its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.5× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 38D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible medially, palpi and tegula yellow; scape and pedicel yellowish brown in front, brown dorsally; fore leg yellow except coxa basally brown; mid leg yellow except coxa basally and apical tarsi brown; hind coxa black, femur orange yellow, telotarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellow; metasoma with first tergite and second tergite except apically black, second tergite apically yellowish brown, from third tergite on brown.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Zhejiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. anatolus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having malar space 0.35× basal width of mandible, mesopleuron granulose-punctate, propodeal carina strong, fore and mid coxae apically yellow, hind tarsus with only telotarsus brown, and metasoma not entirely black.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “galbus” (latin for “yellow”) and “pedis” (Latin for “foot”), because its legs are largely yellow.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1474B6C109DD11C60086C7E20	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147456C129DD11AE8081E7DDD.text	039687B147456C129DD11AE8081E7DDD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex hei Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex hei sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 39–40</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 1.VII.2001, 1520m, Piao Meihua, No 200105708 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Fujian, Chongan Sangang, 5.XII.1989, Wang Jiashe, No 20008409; 1 female, Fujian, Sangang, 9.IV.1981, Wang Jiashe, No 854190; 1 female, 3 males, Guangdong, Dawuling, 3.X.2001, Xu Zaifu, No 20020470, 20020548, 20020478, 20020944; 15 females, 2 males, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Jinding, 12.VII.1993, Chen Xuexin, No 938313, 938830, 938139, 938683, 938665, 938684, 939315, 939340, 939328, 939330, 938319, 938803, 939342, 939341, 939345; 4 females, 2 males, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huixiangpin, 13.VII.1993, Xu Zaifu, No 938254, 936290, 935870, 935855, 936038, 936286; 1 female, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huixiangpin, 11.VII.1993, Yao Songlin, No 937220; 3 females, 1 male, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huguosi, 1.VIII.2001, 1300m, Piao Meihua, No 200107681, 200108977, 200108787, 200108241; 1 female, Guizhou, Xishui Changqiangou, 29.IX.2000, Ma Yun, No 200102761; 1 female, Henan, Luanchuan Longyuwan, 13.VII.1996, Cai Pin, No 974761; 1 female, Henan, Ludai Honghe, 27. V.2000, Cai Ping, No 200101753; 1 female, Henan, Neixiangbao Tianman, 15.VII.1998, Chen Xuexin, No 988826; 1 female, Henan, Songxian Baiyunshan, 11–18.VII.1996, Cai Pin, No 972765; 1 female, Hubei, Shennongjia Muyuzhen, 26.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206503; 1 female, Shaanxi, Liubaxian Shibandian, 19.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201310432; 1 female, Shaanxi, Qinling Niubeiliang, 11.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201305740; 1 female, Shaanxi, Zhouzhi, 26.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201309500, 201309495, 201309565; 1 female, Shandong, Junan, 8.VII.1987, Dong Yancai, No 875415; 1 female, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 26.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206503; 1 female, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 26.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206503; 1 female, 1 male, Sichuan, Daofu Luhuo, 5.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201407160, 201407149; 1 female, Sichuan, Qingchengshan, 3.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 802795; 1 female, Sichuan, Wolong Dengshenggou, 9.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201401452; 2 females, Sichuan, Wolong Yinchanggou, 7.VIII.2013, Liuzhen, No 201409360, 201409316; 4 females 1 male, Sichuan, Xiaojinxian, 9.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201404326, 201404310, 201404306, 201404287, 201404305; 2 females, Sichuan, Xichang, 17.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 801820, 801830; 2 females, Xizang, Lasa, 15.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201406125, 201406117; 1 female, Xizang, Linzhi Bayizhen, 3.IX.2002, Lin Naiquan, No 20033340; 1 female, Xizang, Linzhi, 21.VIII.2003, Deji Meiduo, No 20034366; 1 female, Xizang, Linzhi, 21.VIII.2003, Deji Meiduo, No 20034366; 4 females, Xizang, Xiayadong, 19.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400796, 201403484, 201400665, 201400086; 1 female, Xizang, Zhangmu, 27.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400348; 1 female, Xizang, Zhangmu, 27.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400348; 1 female, Yunnan, Kunming, 30.III.1981, He Junhua, No 811125; 1 female, Yunnan, Lijiang Wenbishan, 28. VI.2007, Sharkey, No 200804984; 1 female, Yunnan, Maguan, 6. VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 20180611; 1 female, Yunnan, Ruili Mengxiu, 2. V.1981, He Junhua, No 813124; 2 females, Yunnan, Xiaguan, 14. V.1981, He Junhua, No 810920, 810915; 1 female, Zhejiang, Anji Longwanshan, 11.IV.1999, Wu Hong, No 20001818; 1 male, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Yuhuangshan, 20.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20057224; 1 female, Zhejiang, Kaihua Gutianshan, 18.VIII.2003, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20058661; 1 female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, Daiwu, No 20042897; 1 female, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 7.VIII.2003, No 20055739; 1 female, Zhejiang, Moganshan, 9.VIII.1984, Qian Mo, No 845807; 1 male, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 13.IX.1993, Chen Hanlin, No 950037; 1 female, Zhejiang, Qingliangfeng, 21. V.2012, Yan Chengjin, No 201202502; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 2.X.1993, Wu Hong, No 945628, 905659; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 15.VII.1989, He Junhua, No 894199; 15 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 25. VI.1984, Chen Xuexin, No 980615, 941824, 997265, 980053, 842593, 20038367, 877194, 872585, 873330, 872393, 872710, 872325, 872375, 872415, 872411; 5 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 20.VII.1987, Lou Xiaoming, No 873712, 874330, 873844, 873794, 874293, 874286; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 25.VII.2011, Song Shengnan, No 201101535; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 30.VII.2003, Shi Min, No 20030634; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 25.VII.2011, Liu Zhen, No 201101877, 201101346; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan Xianrending, 29.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20040044; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan Xianrending, 2.VII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200103977; 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 12. VI.1993, Ma Yun, No 934410; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, No 882753, 882709; 3 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 1.VII.2001, 1520m, Piao Meihua, No 200105179, 200105697, 200105929; 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 18. VI.1983, Shi Zuhua, No 830427; 4 females, 3 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, VII.1998 – IV.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 992423, 20057642, 994370, 998796, 995413, 994354, 200010647; 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Fan Jinjiang, No 875634; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2. VI.1990, He Junhua, No 905091; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. V.1988, Xu Weiliang, No 885597.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 39) holotype. Body length 6.5 mm, fore wing length 5.0 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 29 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 40E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 40E) mat, slightly convex, apical margin slightly curved. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 40F) 1.8× ocello-ocular distance and 2.3× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple mat. Occipital carina evenly arched.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 40G), scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 40B) granulose, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 40C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed medially; all carina strong with median carina under costulae weakly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 40A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.15 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.9× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 40H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.62× as long as first tergite, as long as its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.6× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 40D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, extreme apex of fore and mid coxae, fore and mid trochanters, yellow; scape and pedicel blackish-brown; fore and mid coxae below, hind coxa and hind trochanter blackish-brown; remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown with telotarsus infuscated; remainder of hind leg yellowish brown with apex of hind tibia infuscated and tarsus from first tarsomere 0.8, brownish; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Variation. Malar space 0.5–0.8× basal width of mandible; interocellar distance 0.8–1.8× ocello-ocular distance; propodeal carina with medio-longitudinal carina under costula sometimes indistinct to absent; lateral longitudinal carina weak to strong; areolet with stalk short to long; hind femur yellowish brown to black; subbase of hind tibia not infuscated to infuscated.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guizhou, Henan, Hubei, Shaanxi, Shandong, Shanxi, Sichuan, Xizang, Yunnan, Zhejiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. concretus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having pronotum granulose dorsally, metanotum granulose, propodeal carinae not strongly developed, thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by its diameter, and metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Etymology. Named in honour of Prof. Jun-hua He for his great contribution to the knowledge of Chinese Hymenoptera.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147456C129DD11AE8081E7DDD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147416C169DD11ED50DD27E0E.text	039687B147416C169DD11ED50DD27E0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex liuae Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex liuae sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 41–42</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 25.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201208778 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 41) holotype. Body length 5.2 mm, fore wing length 3.8 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 31 flagellomeres; first flagellomere equal to the length of second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 42E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 42E) granulose with sparse punctures, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 42F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 42G) granulose punctate. Scutellum punctate and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 42B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 42B) granulose-punctate, punctures smaller and sparser than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 42C) granulose; area basalis triangular with carina posteriorly emerged; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris granulose medially, rugose laterally; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; all carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 42A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at its middle.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.4× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 42H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove absent. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.85× its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.55× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.2× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 42D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi yellowish brown; antenna, scape and pedicel brown; tegula yellow; fore leg yellowish brown with coxa black and telotarsus brown; mid leg yellowish brown with coxa and telotarsus black, trochanter basally brown; hind leg with coxa and trochanter black, tarsus except basal tarsomere 0.8 brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma with postpetiole, second to fourth tergites anteriorly and subsequent tergites laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Shanxi).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. adustantennalis sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere as long as second flagellomere, malar space, vertex and metanotum granulose, propodeal area basalis triangular and emerged posteriorly, area superomedia without punctures, propodeal carina strong, hind tibia entirely yellowish brown, and the colour of metasoma different.</p> <p>Etymology. This species is named in honour of Prof. Zhen Liu, the collector of the holotype.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147416C169DD11ED50DD27E0E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147436C699DD11A8A08D07D00.text	039687B147436C699DD11A8A08D07D00.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex lobatus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex lobatus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 43–44</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Xinjiang, Tianchi, 6.VII.1991, He Junhua, No 913429 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 43) holotype. Body length 3.8 mm, fore wing length 2.8 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with at least 20 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere as long as second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 44E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 44E) with minute punctures, mat, not convex, apical margin truncated, sharp, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella indistinct, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth, tapered apically. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 44F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple swollen behind eye, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum rugulose dorsally, polished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 44G), scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 44B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 44C) granulose; area basalis triangular; area superomedia smooth and shiny, weakly rugulosegranulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed medially; latero-longitudinal carina developed but weak; propodeal spiracle small and round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 44A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a distad of M&amp;RS by 0.2 of its length. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus vertical, intercepted at lower 0.4 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.6× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.45× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 44H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.8× as long as first tergite, 1.25× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 44D) abruptly upcurved apically.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus, hind trochantellus yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; coxae brown; remainder of fore leg yellowish brown with telotarsus infuscated; mid femur basally, tibia apically and from first tarsomere 0.5 on brownish, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind trochanter, femur, subbase and apex of tibia and from basal tarsomere 0.5 on brown, with hind trochantellus, tibia medially and basal tarsomere 0.5 yellowish brown; metasoma black with second and third segments somewhat brown.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Xinjiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. rufigastor Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having clypeus truncated and thick medially, interocellar distance 1.5× ocello-ocular distance, mesopleuron and metapleuron punctate, and metasomal colour different.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “lobus” (Latin for “protuberance”), because its clypeus is thick medially and has a lobe-like protuberance.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147436C699DD11A8A08D07D00	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1473E6C6D9DD11ED5084C7ED9.text	039687B1473E6C6D9DD11ED5084C7ED9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex longiclypeus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex longiclypeus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 45–46</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Xizang, Naqu Naixian, 31.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201408822 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 45) holotype. Body length 5.5 mm, fore wing length 4.0 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 30 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.45× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 46E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 46E) granulose, convex and long, apical margin arched, sharp. Malar space granulose, 0.9× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 46F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate, mat, weakly trans-striate on extremely below. Mesoscutum granulose punctate. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 46B) granulose-punctate, trans-striations below tegula short and weak, speculum smooth and shiny, mesopleural fovea absent. Metapleuron (Fig. 46B) granulose-punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 46C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris granulose-rugulose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; medio-longitudinal carina present below costulae and absent apically; lateral longitudinal carina absent; other carinae present; propodeal spiracle small and short oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 46A) areolet present and with a long stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its middle. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell vertical. Hind wing with nervellus intercepted slightly below middle.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 5.1× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.44× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, teeth very weak.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 46H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.8× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.85× as long as first tergite, 1.3× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite about its length. Third tergite equal to its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.1× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 46D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth yellow; palpi brown; tegula, scape and pedicel black; pterostigma whitish basally; fore coxa brown except extreme apically yellow, trochanter basally, trochantellus basally, femur ventrally, tibia dorsally and tarsus, blackish brown, remainder of fore leg yellow; mid trochantellus apically and femur extreme basally yellow, tibia medially brownish, remainder of mid leg blackish; hind leg with trochantellus apically, femur extreme basally and tibia dorso-medially brownish, remainder of hind leg black; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Xizang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. kalatopensis Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having clypeus long, mesopleuron granulose-punctate, mediolongitudinal carina absent underneath, lateral carina absent, area petiolaris granulose, the length of areolet shorter than its stalk, and body colour different.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “longus” (Latin for “long”) and “clypeus” (Latin for “clypeus”), because its clypeus is long.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1473E6C6D9DD11ED5084C7ED9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147386C6E9DD11AB008C678B4.text	039687B147386C6E9DD11AB008C678B4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex maurotrochanter Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex maurotrochanter sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 47–48</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: 1 female, Shaanxi, Ningshan Xunyangzhen, 6.VI.1998, Ma Yun, No 982824 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Gansu, Wenxian Dianba, 16. VI. 1998, 900m, Ma Yun, No 982279; 1 female, Hebei, Zhangbei, 1981, Dai Junrong, No 820163; 1 female, Shaanxi, Huoditang Huodigou, 5. VI.1998, 1900m, Ma Yun, No 982683; 1 female, 1 male, Shaanxi, Qingling, 10. VI.1998, 1800m, Ma Yun, No 983990, 983977; 1 female, Shaanxi, Zhashui Niubeiliang, 15.VIII.2003, Tan Jiangli, No 201306781.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 47) holotype. Body length 4.3 mm, fore wing length 3.4 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 27 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.25× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 48E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 48E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin arched and blunt. Malar space granulose, 0.7× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 48F) 1.3× ocelloocular distance and 1.8× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 48G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum granulose with sparse and minute punctures. Metanotum granulose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 48B) granulose-punctate, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 48B) granulose-punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 48C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia finely granulose, subpolished; area petiolaris coarsely rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 48A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws nearly not pectinate, teeth very weak.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 48H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.0× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 1.2× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Third tergite 0.9× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 48D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; tegula whitish; all trochantellus yellow; fore leg from trochantellus on yellowish brown, coxa, trochanter and apical tarsus blackish brown; mid leg with coxa, trochanter and femur ventrally blackish brown, femur dorsally and tibia medially yellowish brown, tibia basally and apically and tarsus brown; hind coxa, trochanter, and femur black, tibia yellowish brown medially, tibia basally and apically, and tarsus brown; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Variation. Hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.3 or only slightly below middle; the specimen from Hebei province with metasoma from third tergite on not compressed.</p> <p>Male. The surface of body shinier than in female; propodeal carina stronger than in female; otherwise quite similar to female.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Gansu, Hebei, Shaanxi).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. kalatopensis Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having malar space 0.5× basal width of mandible, mesopleuron granulose-punctate and with punctures dense, area petiolaris coarsely rugose, and fore and mid trochanters blackish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “mauros” (Latin for “dark”) and “trochanter” (Latin for “trochanter”), because all its trochanters are black.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147386C6E9DD11AB008C678B4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1473B6C609DD11D5C08B67F49.text	039687B1473B6C609DD11D5C08B67F49.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex medicarinatus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex medicarinatus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 49–50</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 15.X.1983, He Junhua, No834559 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 49) holotype. Body length 5.2 mm, fore wing length 4.4 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 30 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.4× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 50E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 50E) granulose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin slightly arched, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 50F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 50G) granulose punctate. Scutellum punctate and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 50B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 50B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 50C) granulose; area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 50A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws with indistinct teeth basally.</p> <p>Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 50H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove weakly present. First tergite 2.7× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.8× its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.6× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath 1.5× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 50D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi yellowish brown; mandible basally black; tegula yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore and mid legs yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus blackish; hind leg with coxa, trochanter and trochantellus basally blackish brown, tibia apically infuscated, tarsus from basal tarsomere 0.8 on brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma black except second tergite laterally yellowish brown.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Guizhou).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. liuae sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere 1.4× longer than second flagellomere, clypeus granulose-punctate, frons with median carina present, area petiolaris rugose, nervellus intercepted at lower 0.15, tarsal claws with indistinct teeth basally, and the colour of metasoma different.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “medius” (Latin for “middle”) and “carina” (Latin for “carina”), because its frons has a median carina.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1473B6C609DD11D5C08B67F49	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147356C659DD11BC008A579DC.text	039687B147356C659DD11BC008A579DC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex monochroma Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex monochroma sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 51–52</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 9.VIII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20042321 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Guangdong, Shixing Chebaling, 25. V.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 201806185; 3 females, Henan, Neixiang Wangoulinchang, 11.VII. 1998, Chen Xuexin, No 985939; 1 female, Jilin, Fusong Donggangzhen, 30.VIII.1989, Li Lin, No 974169; 1 female, Neimeng, Gegentala, 16.VIII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200100852; 1 female, Shaanxi, Hanzhong Liubaxian, 20.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201309161; 3 females, Shenyang National Forest Park, 16. VII.2011, Yan Chenjin, No 201103694, 201103690, 201103695; 3 females, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, Liu Jingxian, No 201804841, 201805167, 201804175; 2 females, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 22.VIII.1982, Song Qisheng, No 826561, 826560; 1 female, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 16.VIII.1982, Le Yanhua, No 826757; 1 female, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 30.VII.1993, Wu Hong, No 945170; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang Jiulongshan, 18.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 944491; 4 females, Zhejiang, Songyang, 17.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 944382, 943976, 944195, 944197.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 51) holotype. Body length 6.2 mm, fore wing length 4.3 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with at least 34 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.15× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 52E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 52E) punctate, punctures larger than that on face, slightly convex, apical margin arched, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 52F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 1.9× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 52G) granulose punctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region anteriorly. Scutellum with sparse and minute punctures, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 52B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 52B) punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 52C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose medially and short rugose laterally, polished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 52A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (65°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 52H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina, and with a shallow groove. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.85× its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.8× as long as its apical width. Metasoma not compressed apically. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.7× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 52D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, fore and middle legs entirely and tegula, yellow with telotarsus brownish; scape and pedicel yellowish brown anteriorly and brown dorsally; hind coxa black, trochanter except basally, femur and tibia yellowish brown, tibia unicolorous, slightly infuscated apically, tarsus brown; metasoma entirely black with second and third segments slightly blackish brown.</p> <p>Variation. First flagellomere 1.1–1.25× second flagellomere; face granulose to granulose-punctate; frons with median carina absent or present; pronotum granulose-punctate to punctate dorsally; specimens from Shenyang province with ovipositor thinner; scape and pedicel entirely brown or yellowish-brown anteriorly; specimens from Henan province with hind tibia banded.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Guangdong, Henan, Jinlin, Neimeng, Shaanxi, Shenyang, Zhejiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This new species is similar to C. proportionis sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having second tergite 0.8–0.9× as long as its apical width, thyridium separated from the basal margin of tergite by its diameter, metasoma not compressed apically, malar space and frons granulose, and metanotum rugose-punctate.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “mono-” (Greek for “single”), and “chroma” (Greek for “colour”), because its hind tibia is unicolorous.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147356C659DD11BC008A579DC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147306C649DD11DB40B3D7D97.text	039687B147306C649DD11DB40B3D7D97.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex obtusoclypeus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex obtusoclypeus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 53–54</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Liaoning, Laotuding, 16.VII.2011, Zhao Kexin, No 201103248 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 53) holotype. Body length 6.4 mm, fore wing length 5.3 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 35 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 54E) granulose, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 54E) granulose dorsally, smooth and shiny below, slightly convex, apical margin blunt, slightly arched. Malar space shiny, 0.4× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 54F) 0.8× ocello-ocular distance and 1.4× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, polished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 54G) granulose. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 54B) granulose, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugulose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 54B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 54C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris granulose-rugulose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; median and lateral longitudinal carinae absent; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 54A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.6× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.57× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate basally, teeth very weak.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 54H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina present, lateral groove absent. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.8× as long as first tergite, 1.4× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.7× its length. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.1× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 54D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown, trochanter and trochantellus yellow; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa, femur basal-ventrally and telotarsus brown, trochanter and trochantellus yellow; hind leg with extreme base of femur yellowish brown, tibia medially and basal tarsomere 0.6 whitish yellow, remainder of hind leg black; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Liaoning).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. collinus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having face granulose, interocellar distance 0.8× ocello-ocular distance and 1.4× distance between median and lateral ocelli, metapleuron granulose, and mid leg largely yellowish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “obtusus” (Latin for “blunt”) and “clypeus” (Latin for “clypeus”), because the apical margin of the clypeus is blunt.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147306C649DD11DB40B3D7D97	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147336C7A9DD11ED50B947B8C.text	039687B147336C7A9DD11ED50B947B8C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex oriens Gupta & Maheshwary 1977	<div><p>Campoplex oriens Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977</p> <p>Figs. 55–56</p> <p>Campoplex oriens Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977: 53–58.</p> <p>Material examined. 1 female, Anhui, Jiuhuashan, 8. VI. 2001, 640m, Du Yuzhou, No 200109232; 1 female, Chongqing, Jinfoshan, 18.VIII.2012, Huang Xinlei, No 201207843; 3 females, Fujian, Chongan Sangang, 5.XI.1989, Wang Jiashe, No 20007925, 20008016, 20008368; 1 female, Fujian, Dazhulan, 6.X.1991, Chen Xuexin, No 920308; 5 females, Fujian, Fuzhou, 11.IV.1991, Liu Changming, No 966417, 966406, 966420, 966457, 966425; 1 female, Fujian, Fuzhou Jinshan, 11.VIII.1988, Lin Xiaolin, No 20009260; 2 females, Fujian, Fuzhou, 23.XII.1989, Lin Naiquan, No 967495, 967438; 11 females, 5 males, Fujian, Jiangle Longqishan, 16.VII.1991, Liu Changming, No 20007003, 20006966, 20006738, 20006481, 20007107, 20006869, 20006758, 20006742, 20006926, 20006692, 20006642, 20006685, 20006688, 20008142, 20006701, 969616; 4 females, Fujian, Meihuashan, 23.VII.1988, He Junhua, Fan Jinjiang, No 886667, 887388, 886434, 887065; 4 females, 1 male, Fujian, Nanjing, V –IX.1989, Liu Changming, No 20006193, 20006056, 20006135, 20006220, 20006235; 1 female, Fujian, Nanping Maodizhen, 22.IX.2002, Liu Jingxian, No 20025280; 1 female, Fujian, Nanping Xiqinzhen, 21.IX.2002, Li Fangfang, No 20025548; 1 female, Fujian, Nanping Xiqinzhen, 21.IX.2002, Fujian, Wuyishan, 18.IV.2009, Zeng Jie, No 201605336; 1 female, Fujian, Nanping Xiqinzhen, 21.IX.2002, Li Fangfang, 18.IV.2009, Zeng Jie, No 201605336, 201605341; 1 female, Fujian, Shanghang Meihuashan, 24.VII.1998, Huang Jian, No 20005029; 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan, 22.VIII.2007, Xie Cuihong, No 20087216; 3 females, Fujian, Wuyishan, 15.IV.2009, Tan Jiangli, No 201602517, 201605020, 200900104; 2 males, Fujian, Wuyishan, 7.IX.1989, Wang Jiashe, No 964069, 964391; 2 males, Fujian, Wuyishan, 18.IV.2009, Zeng Jie, No 201605336, 201605341; 2 females, Fujian, Wuyishan Fengcunzhen, 20.IV.2009, Tan Jiangli, No 201605198, 201605725; 1 female, Fujian, Yongan Tianbaoyan, 15.VII.2001, Xu Zaifu, No 20020259; 1 female, Fujian, Zhangzhou, IV.1987, Lin Naiquan, No 984836; 1 male, Guangdong, Conghua, 13.IV.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 20027060; 1 male, Guangdong, Dinghushan Nature Reserve, 6.IV.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 20026494; 1 male, Guangdong, Nanling, 24.III. 2003, 600m, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20032194; 4 females, Guangdong, Nanling, 21–25.IV.2011, YPT, No 201803984, 201803526, 201803652, 201803902; 1 female, 2 males, Guangdong, Ruyuan Nanling, 8. V.2004, Xu Zaifu, No 201804661, 201804667, 201804496; 1 female, Guangdong, Shaoguan, 11. V.1992, Ma Yun, No 920899; 1 male, Guangdong, Yingde Shimentai, 28.III.2003, Wang Yiping, No 20032418; 2 females, Guangxi, Longsheng Huaping, 25. VI.1982, He Junhua, No 823270, 823494; 1 female, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, 18.VIII.2004, Wu Qiong, No 201506354; 1 female, Guizhou, Daozhen Xiannvdong, 24.VIII.2004, Wei Shujun, No 201505802; 1 female, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huixiangping, 11.VII.1993, Xu Zaifu, No 935662; 2 males, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huixiangping, 29.VII.2001, 1700m, Ma Yun, No 200108059, 200108077; 3 females, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huguosi, 3.VIII.2001, 1300m, Piao Meihua, No 200108791, 200107594, 200108766; 1 female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 21. V.1981, He Junhua, No 813428; 3 females, Guizhou, Guiyang Huaxi, 28. VI.1992, Luo Qinghuai, No 985611, 985265, 985312; 1 female, 2 male, Guizhou, Guiyang, 15.X.1983, He Junhua, No 834562, 834578, 834655; 1 female, Guizhou, Huishui, VII.1986, Chu Jiming, No 862286; 2 females, Guizhou, Mayanghe Wanjia, 27–30.IX.2007, Liu Jingxian, No 200708493, 200708455; 1 female, Guizhou, Xishui Changqiangou, 29.IX.2000, Ma Yun, No 200102801; 1 female, Hainan, Diaoluoshan, 28. V.2007, Liu Jingxian, No 200702951; 1 male, Henan, Neixiangbao Tianman, 15.VII.1998, 1800m, Ma Yun, No 986916; 1 male, Henan, Tongbaishan, 23. V.2000, Cai Ping, No 200102126; 1 female, Henan, Ludai Shizifeng, 24.VIII.1996, Cai Ping, No 973170; 1 female, 1 male, Heilongjiang, Yichun, VIII.1985, Jin Liyuan, No 853230, 864311; 9 females, 2 males, Jilin, Changbaishan, VIII.1993 – VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No 976435, 976420, 976583, 976444, 976411, 976415, 951633, 976578, 951753, 951745, 951742; 1 female, Jilin, Changbaishan, 10.VIII.1977, He Junhua, No 771456; 1 female, 1 male, Jilin, Liaoyuan, 10.VIII.1990, Lou Juxian, No 977325; 2 females, 1 male, Jilin, Liaoyuan, 10.VIII.1990, Lou Juxian, No 977325, 977291, 200109641, 200109770, 200109816; 1 female, 1 male, Liaoning, Dalian, 5.IX.1992, Lou Juxian, No 976054, 976012; 1 male, Liaoning, Laotuding, 16.VII.2011, Zhao Kexin, No 201104428; 3 females, 1 male, Liaoning, Laotuding, 18.VII.2011, Yan Chenjin, No 201104362, 201104256, 201104411, 201104238; 1 female, Liaoning, Laotuding, 16.VII.2011, Song Shengnan, No 20103660; 1 female, 1 male, Liaoning, Shenyang, VI.1995, Lou Juxian, No 961023, 960958; 1 male, Hubei, Shennongjia Qianjiaping, 21. V.2012, Shi Kai, No 20124439; 2 females, Shaanxi, Qinling, 8. VI.1998, Ma Yun, No 983606, 983612; 2 females, Shandong, Boxing, 6.IX.1984, No 879198, 879197; 2 females, Shandong, Boxing, 1.VII.1988, Hou Xinpin, No 886929, 886931; 2 females, 3 males, Shandong, Taian, Taishan, 20. V.1996, Xu Weian, No 971695, 971766, 971775, 971763, 971749; 5 females, 2 males, Shandong, Wendeng, 12. VI.1988, Hou Shanjin, No 886957, 886955, 886951, 886960, 881425, 881427, 888958; 2 females, Shandong, Wendeng, 1.VII.1988, Hou Xinping, No 886929, 886931; 1 female, Shandong, Wendeng, 26. VI.1988, Wang Liwen, No 886934; 1 female, Shandong, Wendeng, 26. VI.1988, Wang Liwen, No 886934; 1 male, Shanxi, Lishan, 30.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201201230; 1 female, 2 males, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 23.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206693, 201206841, 201208082; 1 female, 3 males, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 23.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206693, 201206841, 201201230, 201308082; 2 females, Shanxi, Qingling Tiantaishan, 8. VI.1998, Ma Yun, No 983606, 983612; 2 females, Shanxi, Qinling Tiantaishan, 8. VI.1998, Ma Yun, No 983606, 983612; 1 female, Shenyang, Dongling Forest Park, 14.VII.2011, Song Shengnan, No 20142728; 1 female, Shenyang Forest Park, 16.VII.2011, Yan Chengjin, No 201103684; 1 female, Shenyang, Dongling Forest Park, 14.VII.2011, Song Shengnan, No 201402728; 1 female, Shenyang, Dongling Forest Park, 16.VII.2011, Yan Chengjin, No 201103684; 1 female, Sichuan, Guanxian, 1.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 803028; 1 male, Sichuan, Yinlong Yinchanggou, 7.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201409073; 1 male, Xizang, Bomi, 9.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201405804; 1 female, Xizang, Bomi Pailong, 2370m, 5.XI.2007, Lin Naiquan, No 201200146; 1 female, Xizang, Xiayadong, 19.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400837; 1 male, Yunnan, Baoshan Baihualing, 12. V.2012, Li Wenliang, No 201201814; 1 female, Yunnan, Baoshan Gaoligongshan, 20.VII.2006, Zeng Jie, No 200907866; 1 female, Yunnan, Dali, 23. V.1996, Du Yuzhou, No 977499; 1 female, Yunnan, Jinghong, 14.IV.1981, He Junhua, No 811547; 1 male, Yunnan, Jingdong Wuliangshan, 23. V.2001, Bo Wenjun, No 20030383; 15 females, 23 males, Yunnan, Kunming, 17. V.1981, He Junhua, No 810757, 813307, 810764 (4), 810765, 813313 (3), 813316, 814254, 810774 (4), 813319, 813335, 811547, 813317, 813309, 813314, 813328, 813321, 813343, 813759, 813322, 813324, 813325, 813331, 813333, 810768, 810775, 810783, 810775, 810786, 810787, 810774; 1 female, Yunnan, Lijiang, 18.VIII.2003, Li Yanjing, No 20046068; 1 female, Yunnan, Lvchun, 25.VII.2003, Li Yanjing, No 20045692; 7 females, 16 males, Yunnan, Maguanxian Bazhaizhen, VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 201806583, 201806691, 201806835, 201806839, 201806938, 201806940, 201806800, 201806797, 201806691, 201806835, 201806839, 201806938, 201806940, 201806800, 201806797, 201806837, 201806853, 201806688, 201806966, 201806713, 201806734, 201806928, 201807121, 201806729, 201806724, 201806705, 201806900, 201806913, 201807086, 201806914; 5 females, 4 males, Yunnan, Maguanxian Bojiaozhen, 3.IV.2017, Malaise trap, No 201807230, 201807243, 201807381, 201807329, 201807273, 201807271, 201807274, 201807401, 201807370; 1 female, Yunnan, Qiaojia, HOST: Pseudaletia separate, No 811091; 1 male, Yunnan, Tengchong, 26.IV.1981, He Junhua, No 811991; 3 females, 1 male, Yunnan, Wenshan, 2017, Malaise trap, No 201802497, 201802251, 201802313, 201802504; 1 female, Yunnan, Wuhexiang, 10. V.2012, Liu Yuanye, No 201202121; 19 females, 9 males, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 20180854, 20181051, 20184885, 20180565, 20180521, 201801939, 201805308, 201805969, 201805179, 201806233, 20184822, 20180601, 20184955, 20184821, 20185011, 20180752, 20181025, 20180460, 20181045, 20180713, 20184748, 20184821, 20185011, 20180752, 20181025, 20180460, 20181045, 20180713, 20184748, 20180654, 201806495, 201806420, 201802169, 20180944, 201801917; 2 females, 2 males, Zhejiang, Anji Longwangshan, 16–20.VII.1995, Wu Hong, No 971168, 971083, 970229, 970214; 1 female, Zhejiang, Anji Longwangshan, 25. VI.1996, He Junhua, No 962801; 2 females, Zhejiang, Anji Longwangshan, 31.VIII.1993, Xu Zaifu, No 8310217, 8310082; 1 male, Zhejiang, Deqing Fatou, 27. V.1995, He Junhua, No 957285; 20 females, 3 males, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, VI.1980 – VII.1997, He Junhua, No 893564, 896940, 893515, 893483, 893513, 893485, 893397, 893461, 850488, 850489, 893387, 922143, 893404, 893588, 893398, 893430, 893432, 893438, 893439, 801523, 840966, 850976, 830221; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 5. VI.1992, Chen Xuexin, No 922019; 1 male, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 24. VI.1989, Chen Xuexin, No 893313; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 28. VI.1983, Shi Zuhua, No 831599; 1 male, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 1.X.1981, Sun Guoqing, No 815524; 1 male, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 11.VII.1985, Wang Hongxiang, No 872282; 1 male, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 31.VII.2003, Shi Min, No 20031952; 1 female, 2 males, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 29. VI.2006, Zhang Hongying; 10 males, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Shaoniangong, 25.VII.2003, Ma Yun, No 20056427, 20056447, 20056454, 20056414, 20056452, 20056415, 20056421, 20056408, 20056410, 20056453; 1 female, 2 males, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Shaoniangong, 15.VII.2003, Li Fangfang, No 20056380, 20056381, 20056392; 2 males, Zhejiang, Jinyun, 7.X.1980, 9.VIII.1981, Li Sichun, No 820415, 820433; 2 females, 2 males, Zhejiang, Kaihua Gutianshan, 1.VII.2005, Chen Xuexin, No 200604341, 200604323, 20064316, 20064312; 1 male, Zhejiang, Kaihua Gutianshan, 18.VIII.2003, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20043853; 1 female, Zhejiang, Kaihua Gutianshan, 2.VII.2005, Wu Qiong, No 200602010; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Kaihua Gutianshan, 19.VII.1992, Chen Xuexin, No 923559, 923686; 1 male, Zhejiang, Lanxi Baisha, 8.VIII.1985, Chen Xuexin, No 852376; 1 female, Zhejiang, Linan Longtangshan, 29. V.2012, Tang Pu, No 201204945; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Linan Tianmushan, 11. VI.1983, Ye Xingqian, Wang Jianping, No 835539, 835445; 1 male, Zhejiang, Longyou, 25. V.1984, He Junhua, No 841449; 2 females, 2 males, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, Liu Jingxian, No 201805097, 20055570, 20055735, 20055507; 1 male, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, VIII.1982, Yu Deming, No 840365; 1 female, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 27.VII.2007, Liu Jingxian, No 201801076; 1 female, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 15.VII.1982, Chen Xuexin, No 826737; 1 male, Zhejiang, Moganshan, 11. VI.1992, Chen Xuexin, No 922582; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 27.IX.1993, 20.VII.1994, Wu Hong, No 945557, 946952; 6 females, Zhejiang, Qingliangfeng, 21. V.2012, Yan Chengjin, No 201202455, 201202464, 201202440, 201202667, 201202652, 201202578; 3 males, Zhejiang, Quzhou Changzhu, 17. V.1985, He Junhua, No 850225, 850227, 850241; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 1.XI.1992, Chen Hanlin, No 934061; 4 females, 3 males, Zhejiang, Songyang, 15.VII.1989, He Junhua, No 895438, 894112, 894228, 894116, 894468, 894474, 894472; 1 male, Zhejiang, Suichang, X.1973, Huang Enyou, No 73063.20; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang Baimashan, 2. VI.1994, Chen Hanlin, No 941548; 2 males, Zhejiang, Taishun Wuyanling, 28.VII–5.VIII.2005, Liu Jingxian, No 200610226, 200610280; 1 female, 9 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 20– 21.VII.1987, Lou Xiaoming, No 874327, 874326, 874380, 874312, 874334, 874309, 873874, 874387, 873765, 873783; 6 females, 2 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, VI.1983 – VI.1994, He Junhua, No 891124, 895578, 830624, 831881, 940841, 890902, 904938, 873874; 2 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 6. VI.1989, Chen Xiaoming, No 892423, 892397; 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 29.VII.2003, 1506m, Shi Min, No 20039518; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 8. VI.2003, Shi Min, No 20031948, 20031941; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826131; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Fan Jinjiang, No 875512; 2 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 6. VI.1989, No 892870, 892809; 5 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, VII.1997 – VII.1999, No 998875, 20002567, 20001994, 20003632, 992095, 996655; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 26. V.2010, Malaise trap, No 201410248; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 25–29.VII.2011, YPT, No 201501495; 2 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 2. VI.1990, Shi Zuhua, No 902141, 902135, 902036; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 25.VII.2001, Liu Zhen, No 201101249, 201101873; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 28.VII.2011, Liu Zhen, No 201101680, 201101632; 3 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 25.VII.2011, Song Shengnan, No 201101513, 201102007, 201101739; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2. VI.1990, Lou Yonggen, No 900731; 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 18.VIII.1999, Yang Yafen, No 999798; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 1.VII.2010, Zhao Qichao; 1 female, Nepal, Danson Bokala, 12.VII.2014, Tu Binbin, No 201502354.</p> <p>Variation. Antenna with 35–39 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.1–1.3× longer than second flagellomere; malar space 0.3–0.4× basal width of mandible; interocellar distance (Fig. 56F) 1.1–1.3× ocello-ocular distance and 1.2–1.7× distance between median and lateral ocelli; mesopleuron (Fig. 56B) granulose to rugulose-punctate; median longitudinal groove (Fig. 56C) weakly trans-striate to strongly trans-striate; hind femur 4.7–5.1× longer than wide; first tergite 3.2–3.8× longer than width of postpetiole; ovipositor sheath approx. 1.3–1.7× longer than hind femur; fore and mid coxa sometimes with basally brown; metasoma sometimes entirely black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Anhui, Chongqing, Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hainan, Henan, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Hubei, Shaanxi, Shandong, Shanxi, Shenyang, Sichuan, Xizang, Yunnan, Zhejiang); India, Malaysia, Nepal, Myanmar, Sri Lanka.</p> <p>Remarks. This is first record from Nepal.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147336C7A9DD11ED50B947B8C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1472F6C7C9DD11C0408F27E04.text	039687B1472F6C7C9DD11C0408F27E04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex parassosae Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex parassosae sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 57–58</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Anji Longwangshan, 11.IV.1999, Wu Hong, No 200011824 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 57) holotype. Body length 5.5 mm, fore wing length 4.0 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 29 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.1× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 58E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 58E) sparsely punctate, mat, slightly convex, apical margin truncated, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 58F) equal to ocello-ocular distance and 1.9× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose with sparse punctures dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 58G) granulose, scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 58B) granulose with sparse punctures, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 58C) granulose; area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose, long and narrow; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia area confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; medio-longitudinal carina and latero-longitudinal carina weak; propodeal spiracle small and round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 58A) areolet present and without stalk, emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.2.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate basally.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 58H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina present, with a shallow lateral groove. First tergite 3.1× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, subsequent tergites largely granulose. Second tergite 0.8× as long as first tergite, 1.6× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Third tergite equal to its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.7× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 58D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, tegula, fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus, and hind trochantellus, whitish yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; all coxae blackish brown; fore and mid legs from trochantellus on yellowish brown except telotarsus brown; hind trochanter and femur blackish brown, tibia basally and apically infuscated, tarsus brown except basal tarsomere 0.8 yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black with apical segments slightly blackish brown.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Zhejiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. pusillus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977 (now known as C. assosae Kittel, 2016), but differs from the latter by having apical margin of clypeus truncated, areolet present, and hind femur blackish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “par” (Greek for “near”), and the specific name “assosae”, because this new species is similar to C. assosae.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1472F6C7C9DD11C0408F27E04	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147296C7F9DD11A8C09F87DC9.text	039687B147296C7F9DD11A8C09F87DC9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex perpendicularis Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex perpendicularis sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 59–60</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 3.VII.2000, Li Weidi, No 200104197 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 59) holotype. Body length 4.2 mm, fore wing length 2.7 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 25 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.25× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 60E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 60E) granulose, mat, slightly convex, apical margin slightly arched, thick medially. Malar space smooth, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 60F) equal to ocello-ocular distance and 1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose with sparse punctures dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 60G) granulose, rugose in notaulic area anteriorly. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 60B) granulose with sparse punctures, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 60C) granulose; area basalis triangular; area superomedia granulose, long and narrow; area petiolaris rugulose-granulose; area superomedia area confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; medio-longitudinal carina and latero-longitudinal carina weak, medio-longitudinal carina becoming strong apically; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 60A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk, emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus vertical, intercepted at lower 0.2.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.9× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate basally.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 60H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina present, without lateral groove. First tergite 2.8× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 1.6× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Third tergite 1.4× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 60D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, tegula, fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus, and hind trochantellus, yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore and mid legs with coxae basally and telotarsus brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg with coxa black, trochanter basally, femur, tibia subbasally and apically, tarsus from basal 0.7 on blackish brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma from third tergites on yellowish brown laterally, remainder of metasoma black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Zhejiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. parassosae sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having clypeus granulose, area petiolaris rugulose-granulose, fore wing areolet with a moderately sized stalk, nervellus vertical, third metasomal tergite 1.4× longer than its apical width, and hind femur blackish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “perpendicularis” (Latin for “upright”), because its hind wing with nervellus vertical.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147296C7F9DD11A8C09F87DC9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147246C739DD11ED50A0378B4.text	039687B147246C739DD11ED50A0378B4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex proportionis Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex proportionis sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 61–62</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Fujian, Fuzhou, 11.IV.1991, Liu Changming, No966415 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 61) holotype. Body length 6.8 mm, fore wing length 4.8 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with at least 16 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere equal to the length of second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 62E) granulose-punctate medially, punctate around. Clypeus (Fig. 62E) punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched. Malar space shallowly punctate, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose-punctate, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 62F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple nearly smooth, subpolished. Occipital carina narrowly curved dorsally, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 62G) granulose punctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum with sparse and minute punctures. Metanotum shallowly punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 62B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 62B) punctate, rugose on the region before hind coxa. Propodeum (Fig. 62C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose, polished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 62A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (50°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.1× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.4× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 62H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina basally, and with a shallow groove. First tergite 3.0× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 1.25× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its diameter. Third tergite equal to its apical width. Metasoma compressed from third segment on. Sixth and seventh tergites with weak emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.0× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 62D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, fore and middle legs entirely and tegula, yellow with telotarsus brownish; scape and pedicel yellowish brown anteriorly and brown dorsally; hind coxa black, trochanter except basally, femur and tibia yellowish brown, tibia infuscated subbasally and apically, tarsus blackish brown; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Fujian).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This new species is similar to C. bazariae Sheng, 2014, but differs from the latter by having face granulose-punctate medially and mat, clypeus mat, first flagellomere equal to the length of second flagellomere, notauli present and rugose, scutellum sparsely punctate, vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS, area superomedia granulose, first metasomal tergite with weak dorso-lateral carina and a shallow groove, sixth and seventh metasomal tergites without median emarginations, fore and mid coxae yellow, and mid and hind femur entirely yellowish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “proportionis” (Latin for “relative equality”), because the length of the first flagellomere is equal to that of the second flagellomere.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147246C739DD11ED50A0378B4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147266C729DD11D5C08AA7D64.text	039687B147266C729DD11D5C08AA7D64.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex protenus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex protenus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 63–64</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, Daiwu, No 20042898 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Guangdong, Nanling, 21–25.IV.2011, YTP; 1 female, Shaanxi, Foping, 27.VII.2013, Tan Jiangli, No 201303527; 1 female, Zhejiang, Kaihua Gutianshan, 18.VIII.2003, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20043899; 1 female, Zhejiang, Linan Tianmushan, 11. VI.1993, Chen Xuexin, No 935113; 1 female, Zhejiang, Linan Longtangshan, 29. V.2012, Tang Pu, No 201204899; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 19. V.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 998479.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 63) holotype. Body length 5.3 mm, fore wing length 3.7 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.05× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 64E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 64E) finely granulose, slightly convex, apical margin arched, blunt. Face and clypeus combined equal to minimum width of face. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 64F) 1.0× ocello-ocular distance and 1.4× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 64G) granulose, rugulose-punctate on notaulic region. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 64B) granulose, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugulose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 64B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 64C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia area granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; medio-longitudinal carina very weakly developed under costula, strongly developed apically; latero-longitudinal carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 64A) areolet present and with a very short stalk, emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.54× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 64H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and without lateral groove. First tergite 3.0× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, finely granulose on subsequent tergites. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.5× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.3× its diameter. Third tergite 0.9× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.3× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 64D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth and tegula yellowish brown; palpi yellow; scape and pedicel brown; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa basally brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa basally and telotarsus brown; hind leg with coxa, trochanter, extreme apical of femur, tibia basally and apically, brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; third and fourth metasomal tergites basal-laterally blackish brown, subsequent tergites laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma black.</p> <p>Variation. Antenna with 29–32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.05–1.2× longer than second flagellomere; malar space 0.5–0.6× basal width of mandible; interocellar distance 0.9–1.0× ocello-ocular distance; hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.2–0.4; first tergite 2.8–3.1× longer than width of postpetiole; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite 1.8–2.3× its diameter; ovipositor sheath 1.3–1.5× longer than hind femur.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Guangdong, Shaanxi, Zhejiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. grandicella sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere 1.0–1.1× longer than second flagellomere, rugulose-punctate on notaulic region, medio-longitudinal carina strong apically, latero-longitudinal carina strongly developed, fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part, and hind femur yellowish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “protenus” (Latin for “before”), because its fore wing areolet is emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147266C729DD11D5C08AA7D64	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147216C769DD11ED508607EBC.text	039687B147216C769DD11ED508607EBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex plicopunctatus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex plicopunctatus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 65–66</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 14.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 943159 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Heilongjiang, Jingpohu, 26.VIII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 962393; 1 female, Jilin, Liaoyuan, 10.VIII.1990, Lou Juxian, No 977327; 1 female, Liaoning, Fuxin, 6.VIII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 961577; 1 female, Xinjiang, Bayin Buluke, 10.VII.1991, He Junhua, No 914390; 2 females, Xinjiang, Wulumuqi, 23.VII.1991, He Junhua, No 916157, 914746; 2 females, Xinjiang, Wulumuqi, 29.VIII.1987, Ma Qi, No 880076, 880101.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 65) holotype. Body length 9.0 mm, fore wing length 5.5 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 44 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.4× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 66E) rugose-punctate, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 66E) punctate, truncated apically. Malar space granulose, 0.45× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 66F) 2.0× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum rugose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 66G) granulose-punctate. Scutellum punctate, becoming rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 66B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 66B) punctate, punctures denser than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 66C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia trans-striate, subpolished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 66A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.9× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 66H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.2× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.6× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.0× its diameter. Third tergite 1.2× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.8× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 66D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible medially, palpi, tegula and scape in front yellowish brown; pedicel, mandible basally and back of scape brown; fore and mid legs yellowish brown except coxae black; hind leg with coxa black, trochanter brown, tibia apically infuscated, tarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black except second tergite dorso-apically reddish brown.</p> <p>Variation. Frons with median carina absent or present; propodeal area basalis triangular to trapezoid; area superomedia rugose to trans-striate; lateral carina weak to strong; hind femur 4.5–5.0× longer than wide; metasoma second tergite 1.3–1.6× longer than its apical width.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Fujian, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Xinjiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. indicus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by face rugose-punctate, frons and ocellar area granulose, pronotum rugose-punctate dorsally, mesoscutum granulose-punctate, scutellum punctate, metapleuron not rugose in juxtacoxal region, nervellus inclivous, and mandible yellowish brown medially.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “plicatus” (Latin for “fold”) and “punctum” (Latin for “dot”), because its face is rugose-punctate.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147216C769DD11ED508607EBC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147236C499DD11B5408E6796D.text	039687B147236C499DD11B5408E6796D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex pseudocyclus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex pseudocyclus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 67–68</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Xinjiang, Hetian Moyu, 30.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601107 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 67) holotype. Body length 4.8 mm, fore wing length 3.5 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 23 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 68E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 68E) mat, not convex, apical margin truncated, sharp. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, with upper tooth longer than lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 68F) 1.3× ocello-ocular distance and 1.8× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple swollen behind eye, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally with minute punctures, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 68G), scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 68B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 68C) granulose; area basalis triangular; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed medially; all carina strong; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 68A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus vertical, intercepted at lower 0.2 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 3.8× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 68H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, as long as its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its length. Third tergite 0.62× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.2× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 68D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula whitish yellow; scape and pedicel brown; fore coxa basally brown, trochanter and trochantellus yellow, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown; mid coxa basally and telotarsus brown, trochanter and trochantellus yellow, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind coxa blackish, trochanter basally brown, trochantellus yellow, femur and trochanter apically yellowish brown, tibia subbasally and apically infuscated, medially whitish yellow, tarsus from basal tarsomere 0.8 on blackish brown, basal tarsomere 0.8 whitish yellow; metasoma with first tergite black, second tergite blackish brown, from third tergite on each tergite apically yellowish brown, basally brown.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Xinjiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. cyclus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere, inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus, mid and hind femur yellowish brown, and metasoma not entirely black.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “pseudo” (Greek for “pseudo”), and the specific name “cyclus”, because of its similarity to C. cyclus sp. nov.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147236C499DD11B5408E6796D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1471E6C4D9DD11ED50B20796D.text	039687B1471E6C4D9DD11ED50B20796D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex pseudostrigatus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex pseudostrigatus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 69–70</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Yunnan, Anning, 18.VII.1988, Chen Xuexin, No 881522 (ZJUH). Paratype: 1 female, Yunnan Lijiang, 18.VIII.2003, Li Yanjing, No 20046116.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 69) holotype. Body length 8.0 mm, fore wing length 5.0 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 38 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 70E) rugose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 70E) granulose-punctate, convex, apical margin arched. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 70F) 1.8× ocello-ocular distance and 2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 70G) granulosepunctate, rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose-punctate anteriorly, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugosepunctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 70B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 70B) granulose-punctate, rugose ventrally. Propodeum (Fig. 70C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia trans-rugose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, with a deep groove medially; latero-longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 70A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.1× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 70H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina weakly present. without lateral groove. First tergite 2.7× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 1.5× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its diameter. Third tergite 1.3× longer than its width. Metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.6× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 70D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible medially yellowish brown; scape and pedicel brown; tegula yellowish brown; fore leg entirely yellowish brown except coxa brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown; hind coxa blackish brown, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia basally and apically, tarsus except basal tarsomere 0.8 brown, femur reddish brown, tibia medially and basal tarsomere 0.8 yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Variation. Propodeal median groove moderately deep to strongly deep, lateral carina absent or present; second metasomal tergite 1.5–1.8× longer than its apical width.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Yunnan).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. strigatus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having mesopleuron with striations not extending to prepectal carina, lateral carina of propodeum absent, dorso-lateral carina of first metasomal segment present and metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “pseudo” (Greek for “pseudo”), and the specific name “ strigatus ”, because of its similarity to C. strigatus sp. nov.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1471E6C4D9DD11ED50B20796D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147186C4F9DD11D240C3B7B1D.text	039687B147186C4F9DD11D240C3B7B1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex assosae Kittel 2016	<div><p>Campoplex assosae Kittel, 2016</p> <p>Figs. 71–72</p> <p>Campoplex pusillus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977: 71–72. (preoccupied by Campoplex pusillus Ratzeburg, 1852)</p> <p>Campoplex assosae Kittel, 2016: 163–164. New name for Campoplex pusillus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977</p> <p>Material examined. 1 female, Guangdong, Conghua Liuxihe, 13.IV.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 20026943; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 18. VI.1983, Ma Yun, No 831261; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Fan Jinjiang, No 875704; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 21.VII.1987, Chen Xuexin, No 877351, 872444.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Guangdong, Taiwan, Zhejiang).</p> <p>Notes. This species is known as Campoplex pusillus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but this name is a junior homonym of Campoplex pusillus Ratzeburg, 1852. Therefore, it was renamed as C. assosae Kittel, 2016.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147186C4F9DD11D240C3B7B1D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1471A6C419DD11FF40AC07940.text	039687B1471A6C419DD11FF40AC07940.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex shanxiensis Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex shanxiensis sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 73–74</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Shanxi, Taigu, 20.I.1984, Zeng Kecheng, host: Telphusa chloroderces, No 840930 (ZJUH). Paratype: 1 female, Shanxi, Taigu, 3.VIII.1983, Zeng Kecheng, host: Adoxophyes orana, No 850112.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 73) holotype. Body length 5.3 mm, fore wing length 3.8 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with at least 25 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 74E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 74E) granulose and mat medially, with minute punctures, slightly convex, apical margin truncate, slightly thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 74F) 1.7× ocello-ocular distance and 1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not immediately receding after eye. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 74G) granulose punctate. Scutellum punctate. Metanotum finely granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 74B) punctate, punctures denser ventrally, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 74B) punctate, punctures sparser than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 74C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia nearly smooth and shiny, weakly granulose; area petiolaris strongly rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 74A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.6× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (75°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.6× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 74H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.4× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, equal to its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.6× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.3× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 74D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; pterostigma whitish basally; fore coxa, trochanter, trochantellus and telotarsus brown, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown; mid coxa, trochanter, base of trochantellus, base of femur, tibia ventrally and telotarsus brown, tibia dorsally whitish yellow, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind coxa, trochanter, trochantellus and base of femur, brownish, tibia clearly banded with base and apex blackish brown, whitish yellow medially, tarsus blackish brown; metasoma black with apical tergites somewhat blackish brown.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Shanxi).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. phthorimaeae (Cushman, 1915), but differs from the latter by having mesosoma subpolished, hind femur yellowish brown except brownish basally, metasoma entirely black with apical tergites somewhat blackish brown, and area superomedia not as wide as area petiolaris.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from the name of type locality of species.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1471A6C419DD11FF40AC07940	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147146C409DD11DC809CC7D27.text	039687B147146C409DD11DC809CC7D27.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex strigatus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex strigatus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 75–76</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Nangaofeng, 5.VII.2003, Chen Xuexin, No 20056145 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Fengyangshan, 15. VI.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20056030; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Wuyunshan, 3.X.2008, Tan Jiangli, No 20081723; 1 female, Heilongjiang, Jingpohu, 26.VIII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 962376; 1 female, Liaoning, Xiongyue, VII.1955, No 65031.6.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 75) holotype. Body length 7.8 mm, fore wing length 5.5 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 37 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.4× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 76E) rugose, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 76E) granulose-punctate, convex, apical margin slightly arched. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 76F) 2.0× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 76G) granulosepunctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum and metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 76B) rugose-punctate, trans-striate below tegula, striations extending to prepectal carina, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 76B) granulose-punctate, rugose ventrally. Propodeum (Fig. 76C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia rugose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, with a deep groove medially; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 76A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.6× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 76G) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.0× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.4× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.8× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 76D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth yellowish brown; scape and pedicel brown; tegula whitish yellow; fore leg entirely yellow except coxa basally and telotarsus brown; mid leg yellow except coxa and telotarsus brown; hind coxa blackish brown, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia basally and apically, tarsus except basal tarsomere 0.8 brown, femur reddish brown, tibia medially and basal tarsomere 0.8 yellowish brown; first tergite and second tergite except apically black, second tergite apically and third tergite apico-laterally reddish brown, remainder of metasoma brown.</p> <p>Variation. Second metasomal tergite 1.4–2.2× longer than its apical width; thyridium 1.5–3.0× its diameter separated from the base of second tergite; scape and pedicel yellowish-brown to brown.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Heilongjiang, Liaoning, Zhejiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. sticticus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having pronotum punctate dorsally, metapleuron rugose-punctate, nervellus inclivous and intercepted at lower 0.1, and first metasomal segment without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “strigis” (Latin for “groove”), because its propodeum has a deep groove medially.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147146C409DD11DC809CC7D27	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147176C449DD11ED50C1979DC.text	039687B147176C449DD11ED50C1979DC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex taenius Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex taenius sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 77–78</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Heilongjiang, Jingpohu, 26.VIII.1995, Lou Juxian, No962459 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 77) holotype. Body length 3.8 mm, fore wing length 2.8 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 23 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 78E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 78E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated. Malar space granulose, 0.45× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 78F) 1.6× ocello-ocular distance and 1.8× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 78G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 78B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 78B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 78C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia granulose, mat; area petiolaris granulose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 78A) areolet present and with a short stalk, emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.1× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus vertical, intercepted at lower 0.25.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.4× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.55× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 78H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and a shallow lateral groove. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.6× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.8× its diameter. Third tergite 1.2× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.7× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 78D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, tegula, fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus, and hind trochantellus, yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore and mid coxae basally and telotarsus brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg with coxa black, trochanter, femur, tibia subbasally and apically, tarsus from basal tarsomere 0.7 on blackish brown, remainder of hind leg whitish yellowish, and metasoma black with apical tergites laterally blackish brown.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Heilongjiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. perpendicularis sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth, propodeal area superomedia wider, median area slightly depressed, costula weaker, medio-longitudinal carina not weak under costula, and metasoma black with apical tergites laterally blackish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “taenia” (Latin for “band”), because its hind tibia clearly banded.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147176C449DD11ED50C1979DC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B147116C479DD11DB30DE77D6D.text	039687B147116C479DD11DB30DE77D6D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex tanae Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex tanae sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 79–80</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Shaanxi, Foping, Liangfengya, 30.VII.2013, Tan Jiangli, No 201303440 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 79) holotype. Body length 4.8 mm, fore wing length 3.2 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with at least 18 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.2× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 80D) granulose, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 80D) granulose, almost truncated apically. Malar space mat, 0.7× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose-punctate, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 80E) 1.0× ocello-ocular distance and 1.4× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple nearly smooth, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 80F) granulose, becoming rugose in notaulic area. Scutellum granulose, becoming rugose posteriorly. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 80B) granulose with sparse punctures, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 80B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 80C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose, subpolished; area petiolaris rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed medially; median carina weakly developed under costula, becoming stronger posteriorly; latero-longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle small and round.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 80A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.7× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.2× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws nearly not pectinate, teeth very weak basally.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 80G) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.3× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite as long as first tergite, 2.0× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.0× its diameter. Third tergite 1.4× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore and mid legs with trochanters, trochantellus and coxae apically yellow, coxae basally and apical tarsus brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg with coxa blackish brown, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia subbasally and apically infuscated, tarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma from third tergite on laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Shaanxi).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. manaliensis Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having face granulose, interocellar distance equal to ocello-ocular distance, area petiolaris rugose, and scape and pedicel blackish brown.</p> <p>Etymology. This species is named in honour of Prof. Jiangli Tan, the collector of the holotype.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B147116C479DD11DB30DE77D6D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1470C6C5B9DD11ED50AC079F8.text	039687B1470C6C5B9DD11ED50AC079F8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex xizangensis Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex xizangensis sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 81–82</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Xizang, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=93.91&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=29.79" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 93.91/lat 29.79)">Yangzhuoyongchuo</a>, 15.VII.2015, 3048m, N29.79°, E93.91°, 15.VII.2015, Liu Zhen, No201409026 (ZJUH).</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 81) holotype. Body length 9.0 mm, fore wing length 6.2 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with at least 30 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 82E) rugose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 82E) rugose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched, blunt. Malar space nearly smooth, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 82F) 1.3× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum rugulose-punctate dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 82G) granulosepunctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose-punctate anteriorly, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 82B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 82B) rugose-punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 82C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia rugulose, subpolished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, with a moderately groove medially; all carinae developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 82A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.55× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 82H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 2.8× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.3× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its length. Third tergite 1.4× longer than its width. Metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.2× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 82D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible medially yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; tegula yellowish brown; fore leg entirely yellowish brown except coxa brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown; hind coxa black, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia basally and apically and tarsus blackish-brown, femur and tibia medially reddish brown; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Xizang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. homonae Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having face and clypeus rugose-punctate, pronotum rugulosepunctate dorsally, prepectal carina without a notch-like constriction, areolet relatively large and higher than stalk, and mandible yellowish brown medially.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from the name of type locality of species.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1470C6C5B9DD11ED50AC079F8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
039687B1470E6C5E9DD11D900B8A7B1C.text	039687B1470E6C5E9DD11D900B8A7B1C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campoplex xuthomelonus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021	<div><p>Campoplex xuthomelonus sp. nov.</p> <p>Figs. 83–84</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826113 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 20.IX.1989, Wang Jiashe, No 964206; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 18.VIII.1984, Zhang Kechi, No 860667; 1 female, 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan, 14.VII.1994, Chen Xuexin, No 943666, 943664; 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan Qiliguadun, 18.IV.2009, Zengjie, No 201605323; 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan Sangangguadun, 18.IV.2009, Wang Manman, No 201605775; 1 female, Guangdong, Shixing Chebaling, 25. V.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 201806165; 1 male, Guangxi Damingshan, 6.VIII.2011, Yan Chengjin, No 201108006; 2 males, Guizhou, Dushan, 6. V.1980, Zhou Shengzhen, No 860552, 860539; 1 female, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Jinding, 10.VII.1993, Chen Xuexin, No 937487; 2 females, Guizhou, Xishui, 26.IX.2000, Ma Yun, No 200102281, 200102738; 1 female, Hubei, Shennongjia Qianjiapin, 21. V.2012, Shi Kai, No 201204451; 1 female, Shanxi, Lishan Dahe, 20.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206019; 1 male, Sichuan, Chongqing, 24.VII.1980, He Junhua, No 801974; 1 female, Sichuan, Guanxian, 4.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 802013; 1 female, Yunnan, Lijiang Ninglangladuhe, 19.VIII.2003, Li Tingjing, No 20046213; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 28. VI.1991, He Junhua, No 911187; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 21. V.1983, He Junhua, No 830292; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 12. VI.1958, Hu Cui, No 5855.7; 14 males, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 22.IV.1994, Wu Hong, No 947063, 947029, 947070, 947071, 947028, 947072, 947073, 947025, 947073, 947025, 947074, 947076, 947075, 947067, 947069, 980639; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 7.VII.1992, Chen Hanlin, No 924533; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 27. VI.1994, Chen Hanlin, No 954191; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 16.X.1982, He Junhua, No 826303; 2 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 27. V.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 995361,995783; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 30.VII.1998, Zhao Mingshui, No 999236; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 27. VI.1998, Zhao Mingshui, No 999517; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 4.IX.1987, Chen Xuexin, No 877098; 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 13. VI.1998, Chen Xuexin, No 980674; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826113; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. VI.1983, Zhou Caie, No 830726; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826113; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. VI.1983, Zhou Caie, No 830726.</p> <p>Description. Female (Fig. 83) holotype. Body length 6.3 mm, fore wing length 4.0 mm.</p> <p>Head. Antenna with 34 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.35× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 84E) strongly granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 84E) mat, slightly convex, apical margin slightly curved. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 84F) 1.45× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple nearly smooth, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 84G) granulose. Scutellum granulose with posterior rugose. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 84B) granulose-punctate, transstriate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 84B) granulose with sparse and minute punctures. Propodeum (Fig. 84C) with anterior transverse carina close to base; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed medially; all carina strong; propodeal spiracle small and oval.</p> <p>Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 84A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&amp;RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.25 of its length.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.5× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.52× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.</p> <p>Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 84H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina and a shallow lateral groove. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.73× as long as first tergite, 1.7× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, small, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.0× its length. Third tergite 1.1× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.0× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 84D) gradually upcurved.</p> <p>Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, malar space, palpi and tegula, yellowish brown; all coxae and hind trochanter, black; remainder of leg yellowish brown with base and apex of hind tibia, apical segments of fore and middle tarsus and whole of hind tarsus, infuscated; metasoma entirely black.</p> <p>Male. Propodeal carina stronger and surface structure of propodeum coarser; otherwise similar to female.</p> <p>Variation. Propodeal lateral carina weak to strong, second metasomal tergite 1.7–2.0× longer than its apical width.</p> <p>Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hubei, Shanxi, Sichuan, Yunnan, Zhejiang).</p> <p>Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary &amp; Gupta (1977) to C. anatolus Gupta &amp; Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having the malar space yellowish brown, all propodeal carinae strong, and punctures of mesopleuron dorsally larger and denser than in C. anotolus.</p> <p>Etymology. Name derived from “xuthos” (Greek for “yellowish brown”) and “melon” (Greek for “cheek”), because its malar space is yellowish brown.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1470E6C5E9DD11D900B8A7B1C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Han, Yuan-Yuan;Achterberg, Kees Van;Chen, Xue-Xin	Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van, Chen, Xue-Xin (2021): The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China. Zootaxa 5066 (1): 1-121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1
