taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
039187D59B5CBB24FE5E769571C58A20.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779635/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779635	Figure 31: Four adult Gobio caught in Upper Lake Constance in the same electrofishing action near the mouth of the Rhein- taler Binnenkanal. Genetic barcoding revealed that two individuals had the mitochondrial DNA of Gobio gobio (upper) and two of Gobio obtusirostris (lower.	Figure 31: Four adult Gobio caught in Upper Lake Constance in the same electrofishing action near the mouth of the Rhein- taler Binnenkanal. Genetic barcoding revealed that two individuals had the mitochondrial DNA of Gobio gobio (upper) and two of Gobio obtusirostris (lower.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59B5BBB22FFE6715776D58FE0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779641/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779641	Figure 34a: Rutilus species of the perialpine region. Rutilus aula (triotto) and Rutilus pigus (pigo) are native south of the Alps. Rutilus rutilus (roach) is native to the northern perialpine region and is introduced in many southern perialpine lakes, and invasive in several.	Figure 34a: Rutilus species of the perialpine region. Rutilus aula (triotto) and Rutilus pigus (pigo) are native south of the Alps. Rutilus rutilus (roach) is native to the northern perialpine region and is introduced in many southern perialpine lakes, and invasive in several.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59B5BBB22FFE674F574548AE0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779641/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779641	Figure 34a: Rutilus species of the perialpine region. Rutilus aula (triotto) and Rutilus pigus (pigo) are native south of the Alps. Rutilus rutilus (roach) is native to the northern perialpine region and is introduced in many southern perialpine lakes, and invasive in several.	Figure 34a: Rutilus species of the perialpine region. Rutilus aula (triotto) and Rutilus pigus (pigo) are native south of the Alps. Rutilus rutilus (roach) is native to the northern perialpine region and is introduced in many southern perialpine lakes, and invasive in several.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59B5BBB22FFE674F574548AE0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779645/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779645	Figure 35: Rutilus rutilus population genomic structure across northern perialpine lakes and phenotypic structure within Lake Brienz.Top left: Principal component analysis based on 3,865 polymorphic Single Nucleodide Polymorphisms: black = Lake Brienz, orange = Lake Walen, red = Lake Hallwill, green = Lake Geneva, blue = Lake Neuchatel.Top right: RAxML phylogeny tree depicting the genetic relationship among the individuals from the five lakes. Bottom left: Morphological (Mahalanobis) distances between roach caught over different substrates within Lake Brienz [145]. Bottom right: representative individuals from the five lakes.	Figure 35: Rutilus rutilus population genomic structure across northern perialpine lakes and phenotypic structure within Lake Brienz.Top left: Principal component analysis based on 3,865 polymorphic Single Nucleodide Polymorphisms: black = Lake Brienz, orange = Lake Walen, red = Lake Hallwill, green = Lake Geneva, blue = Lake Neuchatel.Top right: RAxML phylogeny tree depicting the genetic relationship among the individuals from the five lakes. Bottom left: Morphological (Mahalanobis) distances between roach caught over different substrates within Lake Brienz [145]. Bottom right: representative individuals from the five lakes.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59B59BB20FFE5717577E08E60.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779647/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779647	Figure 36: Diversity of nose carps (Chondrostoma) in periapline systems.Top left: C. nasus Atlantic lineage (Wiese, Basel). Bottom left: C. nasus Atlantic lineage (Lake Sarnen, Projet Lac).Top right: C. nasus Danubian lineage (Alpine Rhine, Lake Constance inlet). Bottom right: C. soetta (Lake Mezzola, Projet Lac).	Figure 36: Diversity of nose carps (Chondrostoma) in periapline systems.Top left: C. nasus Atlantic lineage (Wiese, Basel). Bottom left: C. nasus Atlantic lineage (Lake Sarnen, Projet Lac).Top right: C. nasus Danubian lineage (Alpine Rhine, Lake Constance inlet). Bottom right: C. soetta (Lake Mezzola, Projet Lac).	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59B59BB20FFE5717577E08E60.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779651/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779651	Figure 37: Population structure of nase in Switzerland as inferred from microsatellite data. a) Individual population assign- ments estimated by STRUCTURE for K = 2. PCA based on population allele frequencies: b) with all populations included; c) P. toxostoma excluded. Populations Li, Wi, Mu, Bi, Su, Ro, Se and Do are from various Swiss river stations within Thur, Limmat, Reuss, Aare and Rhine downstream of Lake Constance. Ri is the Alpine Rhine, Da an Austrian inlet to Lake Constance, and Na is a Danubian population.The populations in tributaries to Lake Constance (Ri, Da) belong to the Danubian lineage, whereas all other Swiss populations belong to the Rhine lineage (from [143]).	Figure 37: Population structure of nase in Switzerland as inferred from microsatellite data. a) Individual population assign- ments estimated by STRUCTURE for K = 2. PCA based on population allele frequencies: b) with all populations included; c) P. toxostoma excluded. Populations Li, Wi, Mu, Bi, Su, Ro, Se and Do are from various Swiss river stations within Thur, Limmat, Reuss, Aare and Rhine downstream of Lake Constance. Ri is the Alpine Rhine, Da an Austrian inlet to Lake Constance, and Na is a Danubian population.The populations in tributaries to Lake Constance (Ri, Da) belong to the Danubian lineage, whereas all other Swiss populations belong to the Rhine lineage (from [143]).	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59B57BB2EFFE674F574BB89A0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5780338/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5780338	Figure 38: Examples of Scardinius spp caught in Projet Lac. Upper panel are northern S. erythrophthalmus caught in their native lakes. Upper middle panel are southern S. hesperidicus from their native southern perialpine lakes. Lower middle panel are S. hesperidicus from northern perialpine lakes. Bottom panel are a phenotypic hybrid from Chalain and a backcross hybrid from Zurich, i.e. a phenotypic S. erythrophthalmus that carried S. hesperidicus mitochondrial DNA. * indicates that the identity was confirmed by DNA barcoding.	Figure 38: Examples of Scardinius spp caught in Projet Lac. Upper panel are northern S. erythrophthalmus caught in their native lakes. Upper middle panel are southern S. hesperidicus from their native southern perialpine lakes. Lower middle panel are S. hesperidicus from northern perialpine lakes. Bottom panel are a phenotypic hybrid from Chalain and a backcross hybrid from Zurich, i.e. a phenotypic S. erythrophthalmus that carried S. hesperidicus mitochondrial DNA. * indicates that the identity was confirmed by DNA barcoding.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59B55BB2CFFE4765771998BE0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5780338/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5780338	Figure 38: Examples of Scardinius spp caught in Projet Lac. Upper panel are northern S. erythrophthalmus caught in their native lakes. Upper middle panel are southern S. hesperidicus from their native southern perialpine lakes. Lower middle panel are S. hesperidicus from northern perialpine lakes. Bottom panel are a phenotypic hybrid from Chalain and a backcross hybrid from Zurich, i.e. a phenotypic S. erythrophthalmus that carried S. hesperidicus mitochondrial DNA. * indicates that the identity was confirmed by DNA barcoding.	Figure 38: Examples of Scardinius spp caught in Projet Lac. Upper panel are northern S. erythrophthalmus caught in their native lakes. Upper middle panel are southern S. hesperidicus from their native southern perialpine lakes. Lower middle panel are S. hesperidicus from northern perialpine lakes. Bottom panel are a phenotypic hybrid from Chalain and a backcross hybrid from Zurich, i.e. a phenotypic S. erythrophthalmus that carried S. hesperidicus mitochondrial DNA. * indicates that the identity was confirmed by DNA barcoding.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59B55BB2CFFE4765771998BE0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779655/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779655	Figure 39: Alburnus from lakes Brienz and Lugano.The two individuals top left and middle left were caught in Lake Brienz and represent the form of Alburnus alburnus with elongated head and long snout, the fish top right and middle right are also from Brienz and are representative of the blunt-snouted form resembling Alburnus alburnus from other lakes. Bottom left: Alburnus arborella from Lake Lugano.This fish corresponds meristically to A. maxima. Bottom right: unidentified Alburnus from Lake Lugano.This fish does not correspond meristically to A. maxima, nor to A. arborella.	Figure 39: Alburnus from lakes Brienz and Lugano.The two individuals top left and middle left were caught in Lake Brienz and represent the form of Alburnus alburnus with elongated head and long snout, the fish top right and middle right are also from Brienz and are representative of the blunt-snouted form resembling Alburnus alburnus from other lakes. Bottom left: Alburnus arborella from Lake Lugano.This fish corresponds meristically to A. maxima. Bottom right: unidentified Alburnus from Lake Lugano.This fish does not correspond meristically to A. maxima, nor to A. arborella.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59B50BB29FE5E74B571DC8C80.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779659/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779659	Figure 41: All Cobitis caught in Projet Lac in lakes north and south of the Alps resembled Cobitis bilineata, except one fish from Lake Biel that was phenotypically distinct from C. bilineata and also from C. taenia (fishec number 168747). Photo of C. taenia from the Yonne river (Seine, France) is provided for comparison (photo from Guy Periat).	Figure 41: All Cobitis caught in Projet Lac in lakes north and south of the Alps resembled Cobitis bilineata, except one fish from Lake Biel that was phenotypically distinct from C. bilineata and also from C. taenia (fishec number 168747). Photo of C. taenia from the Yonne river (Seine, France) is provided for comparison (photo from Guy Periat).	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BAFBBD6FFE674B4715D8B60.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779663/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779663	Figure 43: Comparison between the appearance of Esox lucius and Esox cisalpinus in lakes north (black text) and south (white text) of the Alps. Fish in each column are shown approximately to scale relative to each other.The two largest specimens display characteristic patterns for the two species respectively. * indicates that the species identity is based on genetic barcoding.	Figure 43: Comparison between the appearance of Esox lucius and Esox cisalpinus in lakes north (black text) and south (white text) of the Alps. Fish in each column are shown approximately to scale relative to each other.The two largest specimens display characteristic patterns for the two species respectively. * indicates that the species identity is based on genetic barcoding.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BACBBD5FE5E757471AF8EC0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779619/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779619	Figure 24: Relationship of the maximum total phosphorus concentration experienced by each lake versus the proportion of Coregonus species lost in each lake (left) and the genetic differentiation (global Fst) among the post-eutrophication Coregonus species within those lakes that retain native Coregonus species (right). Modified from [42].	Figure 24: Relationship of the maximum total phosphorus concentration experienced by each lake versus the proportion of Coregonus species lost in each lake (left) and the genetic differentiation (global Fst) among the post-eutrophication Coregonus species within those lakes that retain native Coregonus species (right). Modified from [42].	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BAABBD3FE5E765771888E80.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779669/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779669	Figure 46: RAxML phylogeny tree depicting the genetic relationship among individual trouts from Lakes Sils and Poschiavo and reference populations of the five species S. trutta, S. marmorata, S. labrax, S. cenerinus and S. carpio based on several thousand Single Nucleodide Polymorphisms. Note that phenotypic S. trutta from Poschiavo are genetically close to S. trutta from reference populations in the Rhine, whereas phenotypic marmorata, cenerinus and “blackspot” from Poschiavo are genetically intermediate between nonintrogressed S. trutta, S. marmorata and S. cenerinus references.	Figure 46: RAxML phylogeny tree depicting the genetic relationship among individual trouts from Lakes Sils and Poschiavo and reference populations of the five species S. trutta, S. marmorata, S. labrax, S. cenerinus and S. carpio based on several thousand Single Nucleodide Polymorphisms. Note that phenotypic S. trutta from Poschiavo are genetically close to S. trutta from reference populations in the Rhine, whereas phenotypic marmorata, cenerinus and “blackspot” from Poschiavo are genetically intermediate between nonintrogressed S. trutta, S. marmorata and S. cenerinus references.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BAABBD3FE5E765771888E80.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779671/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779671	Figure 47: Weak genetic differences among phenotypically assigned trout populations in Lake Poschiavo. Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components based on several thousand Single Nucleodide Polymorphisms.	Figure 47: Weak genetic differences among phenotypically assigned trout populations in Lake Poschiavo. Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components based on several thousand Single Nucleodide Polymorphisms.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BA8BBDFFE5F7715771E8AA0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779673/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779673	Figure 48: The three forms of Salvelinus in Swiss lakes described by Konrad Gessner in 1575.	Figure 48: The three forms of Salvelinus in Swiss lakes described by Konrad Gessner in 1575.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BA8BBDFFE5F7715771E8AA0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779675/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779675	Figure 49: Diversity of Salvelinus in Swiss lakes with more than one surviving form (based on current scientific knowledge). Forms that were caught during Projet Lac are indicated by *. The generalist form is treated as S. umbla in this report and the specialized forms as distinct taxa. Additional photos of the forms during the breeding season are shown where available (individuals with more orange belly). Horizontal white bar indicates 5 cm. Photos by Projet Lac, Carmela Doenz and local fishermen.	Figure 49: Diversity of Salvelinus in Swiss lakes with more than one surviving form (based on current scientific knowledge). Forms that were caught during Projet Lac are indicated by *. The generalist form is treated as S. umbla in this report and the specialized forms as distinct taxa. Additional photos of the forms during the breeding season are shown where available (individuals with more orange belly). Horizontal white bar indicates 5 cm. Photos by Projet Lac, Carmela Doenz and local fishermen.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BA8BBDFFE5F7715771E8AA0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779677/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779677	Figure 50: Generalist forms of Salvelinus umbla in lakes with only a single known surviving form.Two genetically distinct clusters of S. umbla occur in Lake Zurich.The pictured fish was caught by Projet Lac in Upper Lake Zurich and is genetically and phenotypically similar to the generalist form from Lake Walen. On the other hand, Salvelinus analyzed from Lower Lake Zurich (none caught in Projet Lac) tend to be genetically and phenotypically more similar to S. umbla from Lake Zug (Carmela Doenz, personal communication).	Figure 50: Generalist forms of Salvelinus umbla in lakes with only a single known surviving form.Two genetically distinct clusters of S. umbla occur in Lake Zurich.The pictured fish was caught by Projet Lac in Upper Lake Zurich and is genetically and phenotypically similar to the generalist form from Lake Walen. On the other hand, Salvelinus analyzed from Lower Lake Zurich (none caught in Projet Lac) tend to be genetically and phenotypically more similar to S. umbla from Lake Zug (Carmela Doenz, personal communication).	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BA8BBDFFE5F7715771E8AA0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779679/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779679	Figure 51: Genetic traces of stock transfer of Salvelinus spp among investigated Swiss and Austrian lakes detected using genetic methods (Doenz, Seehausen et al, in prep [25]). These traces indicate that when stocks were introduced to lakes that had native char, the introduced char populations hybridized with the native populations.	Figure 51: Genetic traces of stock transfer of Salvelinus spp among investigated Swiss and Austrian lakes detected using genetic methods (Doenz, Seehausen et al, in prep [25]). These traces indicate that when stocks were introduced to lakes that had native char, the introduced char populations hybridized with the native populations.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BA7BBDDFFE5711770B989A0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779681/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779681	Figure 52: Stickleback were dramatically larger in Upper Lake Constance compared to other lakes. Length frequency distribution of all Gasterosteus spp caught in Projet Lac. Scaled photos on the right show one of the larger individuals from each lake.	Figure 52: Stickleback were dramatically larger in Upper Lake Constance compared to other lakes. Length frequency distribution of all Gasterosteus spp caught in Projet Lac. Scaled photos on the right show one of the larger individuals from each lake.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BA5BBDBFFE47297714F8DA0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779689/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779689	Figure 55: Phylogenetic relationships of Cottus from perialpine lakes (green labels) and streams/rivers (blue labels). RAxML tree with 100 bootstrap replicates. Grey dots on nodes indicate>50% bootstrap support. Adapted from Lucek et al. [41].	Figure 55: Phylogenetic relationships of Cottus from perialpine lakes (green labels) and streams/rivers (blue labels). RAxML tree with 100 bootstrap replicates. Grey dots on nodes indicate>50% bootstrap support. Adapted from Lucek et al. [41].	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BA5BBDBFFE47297714F8DA0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779683/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779683	Figure 53: Littoral (left) and profundal (right) Cottus were phenotypically distinct in lakes Thun (shown in photos), Walen and Lucerne in the Rhine catchment and lakes Garda and Maggiore in the Po catchment.	Figure 53: Littoral (left) and profundal (right) Cottus were phenotypically distinct in lakes Thun (shown in photos), Walen and Lucerne in the Rhine catchment and lakes Garda and Maggiore in the Po catchment.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BA5BBDBFFE47297714F8DA0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779685/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779685	Figure 54: Phenotypic differences between littoral and profundal Cottus were consistent with the distinction between Cottus gobio (top) and Cottus ferrugineus (bottom) in Seeley [185].	Figure 54: Phenotypic differences between littoral and profundal Cottus were consistent with the distinction between Cottus gobio (top) and Cottus ferrugineus (bottom) in Seeley [185].	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BA0BBD9FE5F755777238000.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779693/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779693	Figure 56: Variation in morphology, banding and fin colour in Perca fluviatilis. Figure 2 from [186].	Figure 56: Variation in morphology, banding and fin colour in Perca fluviatilis. Figure 2 from [186].	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BA0BBD9FE5F755777238000.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779695/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779695	Figure 57: Extremes of variation in fin colour in Perca fluviatilis within and among lakes.	Figure 57: Extremes of variation in fin colour in Perca fluviatilis within and among lakes.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BBEBBC7FE5D755771B98B40.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779697/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779697	Figure 58: Salaria in Lake Geneva were phenotypically and genetically distinct from those in the southern perialpine lakes. Males of the populations of the southern perialpine lakes, such as Lake Maggiore, have blue cephalic pores on the lower part of the cheek, while those from Lake Geneva (and Annecy) lack the blue iridescence of these pores.	Figure 58: Salaria in Lake Geneva were phenotypically and genetically distinct from those in the southern perialpine lakes. Males of the populations of the southern perialpine lakes, such as Lake Maggiore, have blue cephalic pores on the lower part of the cheek, while those from Lake Geneva (and Annecy) lack the blue iridescence of these pores.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
039187D59BBEBBC7FE5D755771B98B40.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5779699/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779699	Figure 59. Comparison between common phenotype of subadult Salaria fluviatilis and the new, rare phenotype in Lake Maggiore.The upper four photos were taken with the fish in cuvettes with (left) and without (right) gravel. Lower two photos are of additional individuals of the rare phenotype in their natural habitat. Note the marble pattern on the cheek on the rare phenotype, instead of the diagonal face stripes in the common phenotype. Also the broad, dark midlateral band running along the flank instead of paired vertical bars.	Figure 59. Comparison between common phenotype of subadult Salaria fluviatilis and the new, rare phenotype in Lake Maggiore.The upper four photos were taken with the fish in cuvettes with (left) and without (right) gravel. Lower two photos are of additional individuals of the rare phenotype in their natural habitat. Note the marble pattern on the cheek on the rare phenotype, instead of the diagonal face stripes in the common phenotype. Also the broad, dark midlateral band running along the flank instead of paired vertical bars.	2021-11-12	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole		Zenodo	biologists	Alexander, Timothy;Seehausen, Ole			
