identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
039587FBAE75FF90FF5115F9437CFEFC.text	039587FBAE75FF90FF5115F9437CFEFC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapini sensu Gorczyca 2000	<div><p>Tribe Cylapini sensu Gorczyca (2000)</p> <p>Diagnosis. For details see Gorczyca (2000) and Wolski (2017).</p> <p>Remarks. The current phylogenetic analysis rendered the tribe Cylapini paraphyletic with respect to the vanniines. The tribe Vanniini, as currently understood, is composed of the Vannius complex sensu Cassis et al. (2003) and the genus Palaucoris Carvalho (Cassis &amp; Schuh 2012; Namyatova et al. 2016). Distant (1883) first noticed the similarity between Vannius and Valdasus, which are currently classified in the tribes Vanniini and Cylapini, respectively. The taxa of Cylapini and Vanniini were united in one tribe, the Cylapini, by Poppius (1909), based on the long antenna and by Carvalho (1952a, 1955, 1957) based on the vertical head. Gorczyca (1997) excluded the Vannius complex from Cylapinae and moved it to the controversial subfamily Palaucorinae (with a single genus Palaucoris Carvalho) based mainly on the flattened parempodia found in both taxa and he erected two tribes: the Vanniini (for Vannius complex) and Palaucorini (for Palaucoris). Cassis et al. (2003) refuted this concept, and the Vannius complex was assigned again to Cylapinae as incertae sedis. Consequently, Gorczyca (2006a) treated these genera again within Cylapinae but placed them among Cylapini. The Vannius complex was given a tribal status within Cylapinae by Cassis &amp; Schuh (2012). The present analysis, showing vanniines nested well within Cylapini, provides a strong argument for treatment of vanniines within Cylapini, corroborating the classification of Gorczyca (2006a). On the other hand, given the uncertainties concerning the results of the current analysis (see discussion above) I believe it is premature to relegate the vanniines to Cylapini, and I suggest retaining the concept of Cylapini in its current composition pending studies with larger sampling and emphasis on the molecular data.</p> <p>Notes on the morphological characters in Cylapini. The Cylapini in its present concept includes the genera listed in the Tab. 2. Herein, I present the discussion of the main characters found in Cylapini taking into account their diversity within the group and comparison with other tribes.</p> <p>Body shape. In Cylapini body is usually elongate to elongate-oval. In some species of Carvalhoma (C. ovatum Namyatova &amp; Cassis, C. parvum Namyatova &amp; Cassis or C. taplini Namyatova &amp; Cassis) and in Schizopteromiris the body is ovate (Schuh 1986; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016).</p> <p>...continued on the next page</p> <p>...continued on the next page</p> <p>Head. The head in Cylapini is always hypognathous, varying from weakly wider than high or as high as wide with frons sloping, not perpendicular to vertex (Carvalhoma, Corcovadocola Carvalho, Cylapinus Carvalho, Cylapoides Carvalho, Dariella Namyatova et Cassis, Labriella Namyatova et Cassis, Mangalcoris Murphy et Polhemus, Schizopteromiris Schuh) (Figs 8a, b; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: figs 2A, C, 3C, 4A, C, 2021: figs 3A, C, 5A, C) to much higher than wide in anterior view with frons strongly flattened, perpendicular to vertex (Cylapomorpha, Cylapus complex) (Figs 8c–i, 9a, g; Yasunaga 2000: fig. 2, 3; Wolski 2017: figs 9, 92; Wolski et al. 2020: fig. 28). In all Cylapini, Vanniini and Bothriomirini the antennal fossa is placed more or less above the suture between the maxillary and mandibular plates (Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: figs 2C, 4C, 2021: figs 3A, 5A), and the mandibular plate is separated from the remainder of the head by a suture (Figs 9a–d; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: fig. 2C). In contrast, in all fulviines and rhinomirines the antennal insertion is continuous with the suture between maxillary and mandibular plates (Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2019: figs 6G, 10E, 22C) and the mandibular plate is not separated from the remainder of head by any suture (Figs 9e, f; Wolski &amp; Henry 2012: fig. 74; Wolski et al. 2018: fig. 11). Within Cylapini the antennal fossa is either situated close to the suture between maxillary and mandibular plates (all Cylapini except Cylapus complex) (8a, b, i, 9b; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: figs 2C, 4C, 2021: figs 3A, 5A) or distinctly removed from it (Figs 8c–h, 9a, g), and the suture behind the mandibular plate can be faint (Fig. 9b; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: 2 C) or strongly depressed (Figs 9a, g). All members of Cylapini, Vanniini, and many bothriomirines have the ventral margin of the eyes removed from the ventral margin of head (Figs 9a–d; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: fig. 2C, 2021: 3A; Namyatova et al. 2019: figs 5C, 10D, 11B) and the base of clypeus is positioned below the ventral margin of the eyes (Figs 9g –i; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: fig. 3A, 2021: figs 3C, 5C; Namyatova et al. 2019: figs 5A, 10A, 11A). In most Fulviini and Rhinomirini the ventral margins of eyes are reaching or almost reaching the ventral margin of the head (Figs 9e, f, Wolski &amp; Henry 2012: fig. 73; Wolski 2013: fig. 73) and the base of clypeus is situated above the ventral margin of the eyes (Figs 8l, m; Wolski 2013: figs 33–36; Namyatova et al. 2016: fig. 3H; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2019: figs 10A, 13C, 16C). Within Cylapini the eyes are situated either relatively close to the ventral margin of head (Figs 9b; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2021: figs 3A, 5A) or are strongly removed in the dorsal direction (Fig. 9a,c; Wolski 2017: figs 9, 95). The base of clypeus is situated close to the ventral margin of the eyes (Fig. 9h, 8a, b, i; Yasunaga 2000: fig. 2; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2021: 3 C, 5C) or is strongly removed from the eyes’ ventral margin (Figs 8c–h, 9g). The vertex in Cylapini is either carinate posteriorly (Carvalhoma, Corcovadocola, Cylapoides, Dariella, Labriella) (Figs 9h, 11e; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016, 2021: figs 3b, 5b) or devoid of carina (Cylapinus, Cylapomorpha, Mangalcoris, Cylapus complex) (Figs 11a, g; Wolski 2017: fig. 33). The vertex in most Cylapini possesses a more or less developed depression along the midline. The depression is either faint (Figs 9h, 11a; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016; Wolski 2017: 33) or strongly developed so the head is V-shaped in anterior view (Cylapus complex) (Figs 8c–h, 9g). The eyes are either embedded into the head, with the dorsal margin situated at the same plane as vertex (Carvalhoma, Corcovadocola, Cylapoides, Dariella, Labriella, Mangalcoris, Schizopteromiris) (Figs 8b, 9h; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: fig. 2B, 2021: 3B, 5B) or the eyes are pedunculate (Cylapomorpha, Cylapinus, Cylapus complex) (Figs 8a, c–i, 9g). The latter condition is unique within Cylapinae.</p> <p>Antennae. The shape of antennae is variable among the genera of Cylapini. In Carvalhoma, Corcovadocola, Cylapinus, Cylapoides, Dariella, Labriella and Schizopteromiris the antenna is relatively short, shorter than body length and the segments III and IV are not thread-like (Figs 3a, b, d; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: fig. 1, 2021: fig. 1). In Mangalcoris, Cylapomorpha and Cylapus complex the antennae are longer than the body length and segments III and IV are thread-like (e.g., Figs 4b, c; Wolski 2017: 40, 46, 48, 51; Yasunaga 2000: fig. 1; Gorczyca 2006a: fig. 5; Murphy &amp; Polhemus 2012: figs 1A, B, D). The latter type of antenna is also found in Vanniini (e.g., Gorczyca 2006a: fig. 7).</p> <p>Labium. In all Cylapini, Vanniini, and Bothriomirini the labium is stout and rather short, the apex usually reaching the hind coxae or barely beyond it, and the segments I and II are not subdivided (Figs 9j, k; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: figs 5D, 6E, 2021: 3D, 5D; Namyatova et al. 2016: figs 9F, G, 2019: 5E, 9J). In contrast, in Fulviini and Rhinomirini the labium is thin and long, sharply pointed, the apex reaching beyond the middle of the abdomen, and segments I and II are subdivided (Fig. 9l; Namyatova et al. 2016: figs 9J, 10A; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2019: figs 10 R, 13J, 22D).</p> <p>Pronotum. In Cylapini the pronotum is either impunctate (Carvalhoma, Corcovadocola, Cylapoides, Cylapomorpha, Labriella, Mangalcoris, Schizopteromiris) (Figs 9b, 11e) or punctate (Cylapinus, Dariella, Cylapus complex) (Figs 9a, 10a, 11a, g). The lateral margin is always ecarinate (Figs 9a, b, 10a, 11b). The collar in Cylapini is always present, and in lateral view is situated anteriorly to the propleural suture (Fig. 9a).</p> <p>Thoracic pleura. The mesepimeral spiracle in Cylapini is slit-like (Figs 10b–e, 11c, f), in members of the Cylapus complex it is covered with evaporative bodies (Figs 10b–e). In most Cylapini taxa except for the Cylapus complex, the metepisternum is narrow and rectangular (Figs 11c, f; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: fig. 2K, 2021: figs 3F, 5H). In the Cylapus complex the metepisternum is broad and almost square (Figs 10b–e). In most Cylapini genera the metepisternum is carinate posteriorly (Figs 10b–e, 11c, f, i). The metepisternal evaporative areas are either relatively narrow, straight posteriorly and not extended onto anterior margin of metepisternum (Carvalhoma, Corcovadocola, Cylapinus, Cylapoides, Dariella, Labriella, Cylapomorpha) (Figs 11c; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: fig. 2K, 2021: figs 3F, 5H; Wolski 2017: fig. 35) or are broad, rounded, extended posteriorly, and extended well onto anterior margin of metepisternum (Cylapus complex) (Figs 10b–e). In many genera of the Cylapini the metepimeron is well exposed, not obscured by second abdominal segment (Figs 10b–e, 11c, f). The ostiolar peritreme is usually oval (Figs 10d–e, 11c, f), rarely the peritreme is narrow and ear-like (Amapacylapus) (Fig. 10b) or strongly protruding, thin and arcuate and sharply pointed (Cylapus) (Fig. 10c).</p> <p>Hemelytron. The hemelytron in Cylapini is either impunctate (Corcovadocola, Cylapoides, Labriella, Cylapomorpha) (Fig. 11e; Wolski 2017: fig. 33; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2021: fig. 1) or covered with deep and dense punctation (Carvalhoma, Cylapinus, Dariella, Cylapus complex) (Figs 11a, g, m; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: fig. 1, 2021: fig. 1). Most Cylapini genera are macropterous, and in such genera as Carvalhoma, Corcovadocola and Mangalcoris the hemelytron is further modified (see Wolski &amp; Gorczyca 2014 and Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2019 for detailed discussion on the wing modification in Cylapinae).</p> <p>Legs. In most Cylapini the legs are not modified; only in Phyllocylapus lutheri Poppius, 1913 the fore tibiae are strongly broadened and leaf-like (Gorczyca 2000: fig. 15). Most Cylapini possess moderately elongated legs. In the Cylapus complex the legs, especially hind legs, are strongly elongated (Figs 4c, 6a; Wolski 2017: figs 37, 41, 55). In all Cylapini the tarsus is three-segmented. Tarsal segment I is usually shorter than II and III combined (Figs 10j, 11d, j; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2021: fig. 3J, 5G), rarely I segment is as long as or longer than segments II and III combined (Carvalhoma, Cylapus) (Fig.10i; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: fig. 2I).</p> <p>Male genitalia. The pygophore in Cylapini has no supragenital bridge sensu Konstantinov 2003, instead the ventral wall is much longer than the dorsal wall, and the genital opening is directed upward (Yasunaga 2000: fig. 5; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: figs 7C, 8C, 2021: figs 4C, 6C; Wolski 2017: figs 17, 134). The parameres in Cylapini are similar in size, the left paramere is usually C-shaped, and the right paramere is usually sickle-shaped and frequently with more or less shortened apical process (Figs 12b, c, h, i, m, n; Yasunaga 2000: fig. 5; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: figs 7D, E, 8D, E, 2021: figs 4D–G, 6C–G). The aedeagus is moderately voluminous, not subdivided into the vesica and conjunctiva. The phallotheca is moderately sclerotized. Ductus seminis relatively short and thick (Figs 12a, g, j, 13m; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: figs 7A, B, 8A, B, 2021: figs 4A, B, 6A,B; Wolski 2017: figs 12, 66; Wolski et al. 2020: fig. 40, 48). The endosoma in Cylapini is either furnished with sclerites (Fig. 14r; Wolski 2017: figs 12, 66; Wolski et al. 2020: fig. 48; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2021: fig. 6) or devoid of spiculi (Figs 12j, p, 13a, g, m; Wolski et al. 2020: fig. 40). Sometimes the endosoma is composed of strongly inflated sclerotized lobes (Fig. 12g; Yasunaga 2000: fig. 6).</p> <p>Female genitalia. The ovipositor in the Cylapini is reminiscent of that found in Vanniini and Bothriomirini. Its first gonapophyses have the ventral margin more or less arcuate, dorsal margin sinuate, strongly convex subapically (Figs 21e–i; Yasunaga &amp; Miyamoto 2006: fig. 4B; Wolski et al. 2020: figs 55, 59, 67, 69). The second gonapophyses are ventrally arcuate, with the dorsal margin weakly sinuate and strongly serrate (Figs 21m –q, 22i, j; Wolski et al. 2020: figs 56, 60, 68, 70). In contrast, in most known Fulviini the gonapophyses are rounded, without tooth-like structures or with weakly developed denticles (Figs 22k, l; Sadowska-Woda et al. 2006: figs 2, 3, 4, 12, 13; Kim et al. 2019: figs 2D, 4D; Gorczyca et al. 2020: figs 5c, d). The first gonapophyses are often connected by well-developed, membranous structure (e.g., Sadowska-Woda et al. 2006: figs 2, 3, 12, 13; Gorczyca et al. 2020: figs 5c, d) and together with the second gonapophyses they form a dilatable ovipositing tube (Schmitz &amp; Štys 1973). The latter authors suggested that such a shape of the ovipositor allow fulviines to deposit eggs into the cavities tree bark where they live, indicating that they are predators. This hypothesis may be supported by the fact that most fulviines (unlike Cylapini, Vanniini, and Bothriomirini) have long, sharply pointed labium with subdivisions on segments I and II (which may make it highly flexible (van Doesburg 1985)), allowing these bugs for effective hunting. Moreover, direct evidence for predation exists only for fulviines and not for the representatives of the other tribes (see Introduction).</p> <p>The vestibulum in Cylapini is either membranous and without any structures encircling vulva (Figs 20b, c), or it possesses a well-developed, elongated sclerite adjacent to the base of the first gonapophyses (Figs 20a, d–h).</p> <p>The bursa copulatrix in Cylapini is voluminous, laterally extending beyond first gonapophyses (Figs 15a, b, f, h; 16a, d, g, 17j, 18b, 19a; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2016: 7 F, 9F; Wolski et al. 2020: fig. 66), and with the anterior margin strongly removed from the first gonapophyses in many cases (Cylapus complex) (Figs 15a, b, f, h; 16a, d, g, 17j, 18b, 19a; Wolski et al. 2020: fig. 66). The posterior wall of the genital chamber is simple and membranous (Figs 19f, g; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2019: figs 7G, 9G, 2021: fig. 7c; Wolski et al. 2020: fig. 54). The shape and position of the sclerotized rings are variable within the Cylapini. They can be paired (Figs 15f, g, h, 16g, 18c, 19a, d) or unpaired (Figs 15a, b, 16a, d, 17a, d, h, k). In some genera they can be minute, occupying a small portion of the dorsal wall (roof) of the genital chamber (Cylapoides, Labriella) (Fig. 15g; Namyatova &amp; Cassis 2021: fig. 7A) while in other taxa the rings embrace anterior and lateral portions of the genital chamber (Cylapus, some species of Valdasus) (Figs 16a, d, g, 17a, d, h, k; Wolski et al. 2020: Figs 57, 63, 65) or occupies most of it (Amapacylapus, Peltidocylapus, some Valdasus) (Figs 15a, b, 18c, 19b, e). The lateral oviducts are situated centrally on the roof of the genital chamber roof. They are usually contiguous and, rarely they are separated (Cylapinus minusculus) (Fig. 15f). The lateral oviducts are either wide (Cylapus complex) (Figs 15a, 16d, g, 18a, b, 19b, e) or thin (Cylapinus minusculus, Cylapomorpha, Cylapoides unicolor) (Figs 15f, g, h; Yasunaga 2000: Fig. 7). They can be short (as in Amapacylapus, Peltidocylapus, and some species of Valdasus) (Figs 15a, b, 18c, 19b, e) or long, reaching beyond lateral or posterior portion of the genital chamber (Cylapus, some species of Valdasus, Cylapomorpha, Cylapinus, Cylapoides) (Figs 15f, g, 16d, g, 17d, k; Yasunaga 2000: fig. 7). The spermathecal gland opens centrally in the genital chamber, between the lateral oviducts (Figs 15a, b, f, h, 18a, 19b, e; Wolski et al. 2020: 52, 57), or it rarely it opens in the posterior area of the bursa copulatrix (some species of Cylapus) (Figs 16d, 17d). The dorsal sac sensu Kullenberg (1947) is absent in most studied Cylapini. The representative of Cylapomorpha investigated herein possesses the medio-longitudinal, U-shaped, membranous, structure (Fig. 15h), similar to that observed in Orthotylini (e.g., Pluot-Sigwalt &amp; Matocq 2017: figs 5, 6). In all investigated species of Cylapus and some Valdasus (V. henryi Wolski, Chérot et Carpintero, V. schoenherri Stål) the posterior portion of bursa copulatrix is furnished with a more or less developed, transverse sclerotization connecting the posterior portion(s) of the sclerotized ring(s) (Figs 16b, e, h, 17f, h, k, l; Wolski et al. 2020: figs 63, 64, 65). In anterior view this structure clearly forms a pouch or pocket, and it is reminiscent of the pouch-like structures found in Hallodapini (Pluot-Sigwalt &amp; Matocq 2017: fig. 12). It is noteworthy that species investigated here also possess the endosoma furnished with at least three sclerites (Wolski 2017: figs 66, 71, 80, 97, 102, 135, 14). At the same time, all studied Cylapus complex species without dorsal sac have the endosoma without sclerites (Peltidocylapus) (Figs 12j, 13a, m, 14a, f, e, l) or with a single, weakly developed sclerotized appendage (Amapacylapus) (Wolski 2017: figs 12, 18). This observation may support the hypothesis of Pluot-Sigwalt &amp; Matocq (2017) who suggested the role of the dorsal sac during copulation when some portions of aedeagus and parameres penetrate the gynatrium and probably enter and anchor into the cavity of the dorsal sack sac.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE75FF90FF5115F9437CFEFC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE7FFF90FF51163B4399F8F8.text	039587FBAE7FFF90FF51163B4399F8F8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Amapacylapus Carvalho & Fontes 1968	<div><p>Amapacylapus Carvalho &amp; Fontes, 1968</p> <p>Diagnosis. See Wolski (2017). Female genitalia as described below.</p> <p>Female genitalia. Bursa copulatrix semicircular (Fig. 15a, b); sclerotized rings unpaired, strongly enlarged, occupying most of bursa copulatrix (Fig. 15a, b); lateral oviducts short; spermathecal gland originating below lateral oviducts (Fig. 15a); ventral labiate plate with strongly developed sclerotization (Fig. 15c).</p> <p>Remarks. Exhaustive citation for the genus can be found in Carvalho (1957), Schuh (2002 –2013), Gorczyca (2006a), Wolski (2017).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE7FFF90FF51163B4399F8F8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE7FFF90FF5111574347FA5D.text	039587FBAE7FFF90FF5111574347FA5D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapus Say 1832	<div><p>Cylapus complex</p> <p>Cylapus complex: Carvalho &amp; Fontes, 1968: 273; Gorczyca 2006a: 12.</p> <p>Diagnosis. The Cylapus complex is easily recognized by the following characters: dorsum densely punctuate (Figs 4–6; 9a, 10a, 11g, m); frons flattened, vertical, perpendicular to vertex (Figs 7d, e, 8c–h, 9a, 11n); vertex strongly depressed along midline, V–shaped in anterior view (Figs 8c–h, 9g); antennal fossae situated well above the suture between maxillary and mandibular plates (Figs 8c–h, 9g); clypeal base strongly removed from ventral margin of eyes (Figs 8c–h, 9g); suture separating maxillary and mandibular plates curved, strongly depressed, long, reaching antennal fossae (Figs 9a, g; Wolski 2017: figs 9, 123; Wolski et al. 2020: figs 28, 31); eyes strongly pedunculate (8c–h, 9g); aedeagus with ductus seminis relatively broad and short, secondary gonopore with microsculpture (Figs 12j, p, 13a, g, m, 14a, f, l, r; Wolski 2017: figs 18, 66, 71; Wolski et al. 2020: figs 40, 48); bursa copulatrix voluminous, anterior margin distinctly removed from first gonapophyses (Figs 15a, b, 16a, d, g, j, 17c, g, j, 18b, 19a, d; Wolski et al. 2020: figs 61, 66); ventral labiate plate broad, with more or less developed sclerotized portion medially (Figs 15c, 16c, f, i, 17e, i, m, 18d, 19c); vestibulum with well-developed sclerite, adjacent to base of first gonapophysis (Figs 20a, d–h).</p> <p>Remarks. Carvalho &amp; Fontes (1968) proposed establishing the Cylapus complex for the taxa currently included in the New World genera Amapacylapus, Cylapus, Peltidocylapus, and Valdasus. The results of the current phylogenetic analysis, revealing a strongly supported grouping of those genera, fully justifies the recognition of Cylapus complex. The New World genera Microcylapus Carvalho, Valdasoides Carvalho, and Duckecylapus Carvalho were not included in the present analysis due to lack of specimens, and it’s therefore difficult to indicate whether they belong to the Cylapus complex in this phylogenetic analysis. The placement of Microcylapus within the group is doubtful, as it possesses an impunctate body (Carvalho 1989). Based on the shared characters such as the punctate dorsum, pedunculated eye, distinct longitudinal depression on vertex or long antennae occurring in the genera Valdasoides Carvalho and Duckecylapus Carvalho (Carvalho 1982, 1989), it can be hypothesized that they may belong to the Cylapus complex. However, this placement remains uncertain until the structure of the thoracic pleura and male and female genitalia are thoroughly examined. Therefore, the Cylapus complex as defined herein is composed of the genera Amapacylapus, Cylapus, Peltidocylapus, and Valdasus (Tab. 2). Due to the limited access to the material, some species currently belonging to the genera Amapacylapus and Cylapus could not be carefully studied, and their generic placement remains uncertain (Wolski 2017). This is also the case for the genus Peltidocylapus (see below).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE7FFF90FF5111574347FA5D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE7FFF95FF51175343E9FEA0.text	039587FBAE7FFF95FF51175343E9FEA0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapus Say 1832	<div><p>Cylapus Say, 1832</p> <p>Diagnosis. In addition to the characters provided by Wolski (2017), this genus can be easily distinguished from other members of the Cylapus complex by the following features of the female genitalia presented below.</p> <p>Female genitalia. Bursa copulatrix trapezoidal (Figs 16a, d, g, 17a, j), rarely semicircular (17c, g); sclerotized rings usually unpaired or rarely paired, narrow, embracing anterior and lateral margins of bursa copulatrix (Figs 16a, d, g, 17a, d, h, k); dorsal sac sclerotized, with a more or less developed, transverse sclerotization connecting posterior portion(s) of sclerotized ring(s) (Figs 16a, b, d, e, g, h, 17a, f, h, k); ventral labiate plate broad, with stripe-like sclerotization (Figs 16c, f, i, 17e, i, m); posterior wall of bursa copulatrix membranous (Fig. 19g).</p> <p>Remarks. The results of the present phylogenetic analyses fully corroborate my previous observation (Wolski 2017) that the genus Cylapocerus Carvalho &amp; Fontes should be treated as a synonym of Cylapus. The most distinctive features allowing for distinguishing Cylapus from other members of the Cylapus complex are: the metathoracic ostiolar canal strongly raised above the evaporative areas, the ostiolar peritreme arcuate and sharply pointed (Fig. 10c), tarsomere I as long as or weakly longer than II and III combined (Fig. 10i), the endosoma usually with at least four sclerites (Wolski 2017: figs 66, 71, 80, 85, 97, 102, 110, 135, 140); the bursa copulatrix trapezoidal, rarely semicircular; the sclerotized rings thin, embracing the bursa copulatrix, the posterior edge (sac) of bursa copulatrix strongly sclerotized and with more or less developed transverse sclerite connecting posterior portions of sclerotized rings; vlp with a narrow, stripe-like sclerotization (Figs 16, 17).</p> <p>Citation for the genus and treated species were given by Carvalho (1957), Schuh (2002 –2013), Gorczyca (2006a), and Wolski (2017).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE7FFF95FF51175343E9FEA0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE7AFF95FF5111AB471BFD83.text	039587FBAE7AFF95FF5111AB471BFD83.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapus amazonicus (Carvalho 1989)	<div><p>Cylapus amazonicus (Carvalho, 1989)</p> <p>(Figs 16a–c)</p> <p>Diagnosis. See Wolski (2017).</p> <p>Female genitalia. Bursa copulatrix trapezoidal (Fig. 16a); sclerotized rings unpaired (Figs 16a, b); sclerotization of dorsal sac, with anterior margin concave medially, and its posterior margin arcuate (Figs 16a, b).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE7AFF95FF5111AB471BFD83	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE7AFF95FF51128B43BEFC44.text	039587FBAE7AFF95FF51128B43BEFC44.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapus antennatus (Carvalho & Fontes 1968)	<div><p>Cylapus antennatus (Carvalho &amp; Fontes, 1968)</p> <p>(Figs 16d–f)</p> <p>Diagnosis. See Wolski (2017).</p> <p>Female genitalia. Bursa copulatrix trapezoidal (Fig. 16d); sclerotized rings unpaired (Figs 16d, e); sclerotization of dorsal sac with anterior margin longer and weakly arcuate to, nearly straight and posterior margin strongly arcuate (Figs 16d, e).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE7AFF95FF51128B43BEFC44	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE7AFF95FF5113CF4767FB27.text	039587FBAE7AFF95FF5113CF4767FB27.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapus citus Bergroth 1922	<div><p>Cylapus citus Bergroth, 1922</p> <p>(Figs 16g –k)</p> <p>Diagnosis. See Wolski (2017).</p> <p>Female genitalia. Bursa copulatrix trapezoidal (Fig. 16g); sclerotized rings paired (Figs 16g, h); sclerotization of dorsal sac massive, its anterior margin longer, posterior and anterior margins weakly arcuate (Figs 16g, h).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE7AFF95FF5113CF4767FB27	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE7AFF95FF51152F4680FA04.text	039587FBAE7AFF95FF51152F4680FA04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapus marginicollis (Distant 1883)	<div><p>Cylapus marginicollis (Distant, 1883)</p> <p>(Figs 17a, b)</p> <p>Diagnosis. See Wolski (2017).</p> <p>Female genitalia. Bursa copulatrix trapezoidal (Figs 17a, b); sclerotized rings unpaired (Fig. 17a); sclerotization of dorsal sac large, its anterior margin arcuate, posterior margin almost straight (Fig. 17a).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE7AFF95FF51152F4680FA04	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE7AFF95FF51160F4338F8CB.text	039587FBAE7AFF95FF51160F4338F8CB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapus ruficeps Bergroth 1922	<div><p>Cylapus ruficeps Bergroth, 1922</p> <p>(Figs 17c–f)</p> <p>Diagnosis. See Wolski (2017).</p> <p>Female genitalia. Bursa copulatrix semicircular (Figs 17c, d, f); sclerotized rings unpaired (Fig. 17d); sclerotization of dorsal sac moderately developed, its anterior margin weakly arcuate, posterior margin strongly sinuate (Fig. 17f)</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE7AFF95FF51160F4338F8CB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE46FFA9FF5117294109F801.text	039587FBAE46FFA9FF5117294109F801.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapus tenuicornis (Say 1832)	<div><p>Cylapus tenuicornis (Say, 1832)</p> <p>(Figs 17g –i)</p> <p>Diagnosis. See Wolski (2017).</p> <p>Female genitalia. Bursa copulatrix semicircular (Fig. 17g –h); sclerotized rings unpaired (Fig. 17h); sclerotization of dorsal sac moderately developed, arcuate (Fig. 17h).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE46FFA9FF5117294109F801	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE47FFA8FF5110AE46AAFE87.text	039587FBAE47FFA8FF5110AE46AAFE87.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapus tucuruiensis (Carvalho 1989)	<div><p>Cylapus tucuruiensis (Carvalho, 1989)</p> <p>(Figs 17j–m)</p> <p>Diagnosis. See Wolski (2017).</p> <p>Female genitalia. Bursa copulatrix trapezoidal (Fig. 17j); sclerotized rings unpaired (Fig. 17k); sclerotization of dorsal sac large, its posterior margin weakly arcuate, anterior margin straight (Fig. 17k).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE47FFA8FF5110AE46AAFE87	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE47FFAEFF51118E47A6FC49.text	039587FBAE47FFAEFF51118E47A6FC49.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus : Carvalho & Fontes 1968	<div><p>Peltidocylapus Carvalho</p> <p>Peltidocylapus Poppius, 1909: 11 (new genus). Type species: Peltidocylapus rugosus (Distant, 1883) (designated by Carvalho 1957).</p> <p>Peltidocylapus: Carvalho &amp; Fontes 1968: 274 (diagnosis), 275; Schuh 1995: 32 (catalog), 2002–2013 (catalog online); Gorczyca 2000: 48 (list), 2006a: 17 (catalog); Wolski 2017 (406) (key to genera of worldwide Cylapini).</p> <p>Cylapus (Peltidocylapus): Bergroth 1920: 71 (list); Carvalho, 1957: 31 (catalog).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of features: pronotum covered with fine, short, recumbent and/or semirecumbent setae (Figs 7d, e, 11g, m, n); ostiolar peritreme broad and moderately raised above evaporative areas (Figs 10d, 11i); scutellum usually with broad, longitudinal, more or less developed swelling medially (Figs 4 a–d, 6, 7d, 11g, m); mesepimeron impunctate (Figs 10d, 11i); left paramere C-shaped, apical process usually with more or less developed outgrowth dorso-basally (Figs 12m, n, s, t, 13d, e, j, k, p, q, 14c, d, i, j); right paramere sickle–shaped (12o, u, 13f, l, r, 14e, k, q, u); endosoma usually without sclerites, only with sclerotized lobe (Figs 12j–l, p–r, 13a–c, g–i, m–o, 14a, b, f, g, l–n), rarely endosoma furnished with sclerites (Fig. 14r); distal sclerotized part of ductus seminis usually strongly enlarged, caliciform, with dorsal portion weakly sclerotized, transparent (Figs 12j, k, p, q, 13a, g, m, 14a, f, l), rarely endosoma with small distal portion of ductus seminis (Fig. 14r); bursa copulatrix ovoid (Figs 18a–c, 19a, b, d, e); sclerotized rings paired, well-developed, occupying most of bursa copulatrix, usually kidneyshaped (Figs 18b, c, 19a, b, d); lateral oviducts thick (Figs 18a, c, 19a, d); vermiform gland originating from area situated weakly below lateral oviducts (Figs 18a, c, 19a, e); ventral labiate with broad, well-developed sclerotization (Figs 18d, 19c); posterior wall of bursa copulatrix membranous (Fig. 19f).</p> <p>Redescription. Female. COLORATION. Dorsum usually uniformly dark brown to black (Figs 4–6). TEXTURE AND VESTITURE. Dorsum deeply and densely punctate (Figs 4–6, 11g, m). Head. Matte; covered with short, sparse, semi -recumbent setae; antennal segment I covered with several semi -recumbent setae; segment II from shiny and glabrous to matte and covered with short, relatively dense, semi recumbent setae; segments III and IV covered with semi recumbent, short, moderately dense setae. Thorax. Pronotum. Covered with relatively dense, short, recumbent setae; calli usually impunctate, rarely weakly punctate; posterior lobe densely punctate (Figs 4–6, 11 gm m). Scutellum. Covered with short, sparse recumbent setae or with long, semi-recumbent or erect setae (Figs 11h, l). Thoracic pleura. Covered with fine, sparse to dense setae; proepisternum impunctate, shiny; proepimeron punctate; remaining pleura smooth to rugose (Figs 10d, 11i). Hemelytron. Punctate, covered with fine, sparse to dense setae (Figs 4–6, 11g, m). Abdomen. Covered with short, semi-recumbent setae. STRUCTURE. Macropterous; body usually elongate, rarely elongate oval (Figs 4–6). Head. Vertex not carinate posteriorly (Figs 11g, m), medial, longitudinal sulcus strongly developed, vertex V-shaped in anterior view; eyes strongly pedunculate; clypeus moderately convex, its base distinctly removed from ventral margin of eye; antennal fossa strongly removed from suture between maxillary and mandibular plates (Figs 8c–h, 9a, g); antenna longer than body length, thread-like; antennal segment I weakly broadened toward apex; antennal segment II mostly cylindrical, weakly and narrowly broadened basally, weakly broadened toward apex; segments III and IV filiform (Figs 4–6, 7d, e); labium thick, reaching abdominal segments II or III (Fig. 7d, 11n). Thorax. Pronotum. Collar relatively narrow, depressed, separated by shallow sulcus; calli distinct, moderately convex, divided by distinct, longitudinal sulcus; posterior lobe flat or with more less distinct swelling medially; lateral margin not carinate (Figs 4– 6, 11n). Mesoscutum and scutellum. Mesoscutum weakly convex; scutellum with distinct, longitudinal swelling medially (Figs 4–6, 7d, 11g, m). Thoracic pleura. Mesepimeral spiracle with weakly developed evaporative bodies; metepisternum with broad evaporative bodies occupying ventral portion of segment; ostiolar peritreme placed medially on metepisternum, moderately raised above surface of evaporative areas, oval, blunt; metepisternum with distinct posterior carina (Figs 10d, 11i). Legs. Long, metafemur longest (Figs 4c, 5a, d, 6a 7d); tarsus with tarsomere II and III tarsomeres combined twice as long as tarsomere I (Figs 10j, 11o). Abdomen. Genitalia. Bursa copulatrix ovoid (Figs 18a–c, 19a, b, d, e); sclerotized rings paired, well-developed, occupying most of bursa copulatrix, kidney-shaped (Figs 18b, c, 19a, b, d); lateral oviducts thick (Figs 18a, c, 19a, d); vermiform gland originating from area situated weakly below lateral oviducts (Figs 18a, c, 19a, e); ventral labiate with broad, well-developed sclerotization (Figs 18d, 19c); posterior wall of bursa copulatrix membranous (Fig. 19f).</p> <p>Male. Like female in coloration, structure, texture, and vestiture. Genitalia. Theca well sclerotized; endosoma usually with ductus seminis short and thick, distal, sclerotized portion of ductus seminis strongly developed, caliciform, dorsal portion weakly sclerotized, transparent (Figs 12j–l, p–r, 13a, g, m, 14a, f, l), rarely ductus seminis moderately thickened and relatively long, distal, sclerotized portion of ductus seminis relatively small (Fig. 14r); endosoma membranous, usually without sclerotized appendages (Figs 12p, 13a, 14a, b, f, g), sometimes with sclerotized, serrate lobe apically (12j, l, 13g, h, m, n, 14l–n), rarely endosoma with long sclerotized appendages (Figs 14r); left paramere C-shaped, apical process usually with baso-dorsal, more or less developed outgrowth (12m, n, s, t, 13d, e, j, k, p, q, 14c, d, i, j); right paramere sickle-shaped (Figs 12o, u, 13f, l, r, 14e, k, q, u).</p> <p>Remarks. Peltidocylapus as here defined is most like Valdasus Stal in sharing the character of the metathoracic ostiolar peritreme characteristic of being oval, relatively broad, and moderately raised above the evaporative areas. In Amapacylapus and Cylapus, the ostiolar peritreme is strongly raised above evaporative area and is either narrow and ear-like (Amapacylapus) or arcuate and sharply pointed (Cylapus) (Wolski 2017; Wolski et al. 2020). Peltidocylapus can be easily distinguished from Valdasus by the pronotum being covered with short, recumbent or semi-recumbent setae (erect and long in Valdasus) and the impunctate mesepimeron (rugo-punctate or punctate in Valdasus). Both the equally weighted and the implied weight analyses presented in this paper recovered a grouping composed of taxa belonging to Peltidocylapus and Valdasus, and the IW analysis showed a sister group relationship of both genera (Fig. 2). In contrast, the EW analysis recovered a polyphyletic Peltidocylapus and an unresolved position of Valdasus (Fig. 1), which casts doubt on the taxonomic arrangement presented in the present paper. In this scenario Peltidocylapus spinosus sp. nov. receives an uncertain position within the clade Peltidocylapus + Valdasus. This is the only analyzed Peltidocylapus species having the endosoma with the sclerites (Fig. 14r). Remaining taxa included in the analysis possess an endosoma without sclerites (Figs 12j, 13a) and this character was shown to unite these species in the EW analysis (Fig. 2). Unfortunately, I was not able to study the female and male genitalia of P. cerbereus, P. festinabundus, P. nubilus, P. picatus or P. politus, and therefore they were not included in the analysis. Future exploration of the genitalic structures of these taxa will give more complete data and allow for better understanding of the relationships within Peltidocylapus and providing a more stable classification of the genus.</p> <p>Key to species of Peltidocylapus</p> <p>1. Scutellum yellow (Fig. 5e)................................................ Peltidocylapus politus (Poppius, 1909)</p> <p>- Scutellum brown to black (Figs 4, 5a–d, 6)................................................................. 2</p> <p>2. Total length greater than 5.0 mm......................................................................... 3</p> <p>- Body smaller than 5.0 mm............................................................................. 11</p> <p>3. Pronotum with broad, yellow tinged stripe on each lateral margin (Fig. 4e); hemelytron dark brown with yellow stripes on clavus and corium (Fig. 4e)......................................... Peltidocylapus festinabundus (Bergroth, 1922)</p> <p>- Pronotum uniformly black (Figs 4a, b, d, 5c, 6); hemelytron dark brown, with large black areas (Figs 4a, b, d, 5c, 6)...... 4</p> <p>4. Posterior lobe of pronotum flat (Fig. 6d); endosoma with four strongly developed sclerites (Fig. 14r).............................................................................................. Peltidocylapus spinosus sp. nov.</p> <p>- Posterior lobe of pronotum with longitudinal swelling medially (Figs 4a, b, d, 5c, 6a–c, 11g, m); endosoma without any sclerites (Figs 12j, l, p, r, 13a–c, g–i, m–o, 14a, b, f, g, l–n), or sometimes with sclerotized lobe apically (Figs 12l, 13g –h, 14l)...... 5</p> <p>5. Antennal segment II with relatively broad, apical, white annulation that is as wide as half of interocular distance (Figs 6a, b); clavus with short, longitudinal yellow whitish patch subapically (Figs 6a, b); lateral outgrowth on basal portion of left paramere apical process short in dorsal view (Figs 14c, d, i, j); distal part of ductus seminis short, occupying not more than one-third of endosoma (Figs 14a, b, f–h), its ventro-apical margin with medial incision (Figs 14b, h)............................. 6</p> <p>- Antennal segment II with narrow white annulation on apex, much narrower than half of interocular distance (Figs 4a, b, d, 5c, 6c, 7d); clavus without yellow patch (Figs 4a, b, d, 5c, 6c); distal part of ductus seminis inside endosoma more or less caliciform, long, occupying half of endosoma length, its ventro-apical margin straight or weakly convex (Figs 12l, r, 13b, o, 14n).................................................................................................... 7</p> <p>6. Ventro-apical margin of ductus seminis inside endosoma with deep incision (Fig. 14b)..... Peltidocylapus rugosus (Distant)</p> <p>- Ventro-apical margin of distal part of ductus seminis inside endosoma with shallow incision (Fig. 14h)..................</p> <p>1 Peltidocylapus tapirapensis Carvalho &amp; Rosas, 1968 is not included in the key. See discussion under the species for further details......................................................................... Peltidocylapus scutellaris Poppius</p> <p>7. Medial, convex part of scutellum with long, erect setae (as in Fig. 11l)............................................8</p> <p>- Medial, convex part of scutellum practically glabrous or with short, semi-recumbent setae (as in Fig. 11h)............... 9</p> <p>8. Apical process of left paramere with distinctly developed lateral outgrowth (Figs 13d, e)..................................................................................................... Peltidocylapus ecuadorensis sp. nov.</p> <p>- Apical process of left paramere without any lateral outgrowth (Figs 14o, p)............... Peltidocylapus simplex sp. nov.</p> <p>9. Distal part of ductus seminis inside endosoma nearly rectangular and lateral margins very weakly arcuate (Figs 13m, o).............................................................................. Peltidocylapus parallelus sp. nov.</p> <p>- Distal part of ductus seminis inside endosoma caliciform (Figs 12j, p).......................................... 10</p> <p>10. Lateral outgrowth of left paramere apical process when viewed dorsally is thin and, strongly curved (Figs 12t); right paramere with apical process relatively long, arcuate (Fig. 12u); medial portion of distal part of ductus seminis inside endosoma with long sclerotization (Figs 12p, q)..................................................... Peltidocylapus caudatus sp. nov.</p> <p>- Lateral process of left paramere apical process, when viewed dorsally is, thick, weakly curved, and almost straight (Fig. 12n); right paramere with apical process short, almost straight (Fig. 12o); medial portion of distal part of ductus seminis inside endosoma without any sclerotization (Fig. 12j, k).................................... Peltidocylapus calyciformis sp. nov.</p> <p>11. Basal half of corium yellow (Fig. 5b)............................................ Peltidocylapus pallidus sp. nov.</p> <p>- Basal half of corium black, dark brown or light castaneous (Figs 4c, 5a, d)....................................... 12</p> <p>12. Corium with yellow patches, scutellum with yellow patch apically (Fig. 5d; Carvalho &amp; Fontes 1968: fig. 1)............ 13</p> <p>- Corium uniformly dark brown or light castaneous, apex of scutellum without yellow patch (Figs 4c, 5a)............... 14</p> <p>13. Corium with two yellow patches medially and apically, patch on apex of scutellum broad (Fig. 5d)........................................................................................... Peltidocylapus picatus (Distant, 1893)</p> <p>- Corium with a single, semilunar patch medially, patch on apex of scutellum narrow (Carvalho &amp; Fontes 1968: fig. 1)................................................................ Peltidocylapus carmelitanus Carvalho &amp; Fontes, 1968</p> <p>14. Basolateral angle of scutellum without distinct yellow patch; antennal segment II uniformly dark brown (Fig. 5a)............................................................................... Peltidocylapus nubilus (Distant, 1893)</p> <p>- Basolateral angle of scutellum with distinct yellow patch; antennal segment II with white annulation apically (Fig. 4c)......................................................................... Peltidocylapus cerbereus (Distant, 1883)</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE47FFAEFF51118E47A6FC49	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE41FFADFF5113D640E1FB08.text	039587FBAE41FFADFF5113D640E1FB08.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus calyciformis Wolski 2021	<div><p>Peltidocylapus calyciformis new species</p> <p>(Figs 4a, 7d, 8e, 11k, 12j–o, 18a)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of characters: dorsum dark brown-black (Fig. 4a); antennal segment II with white annulation on apex that is much narrower than half of interocular distance (Fig. 4a); posterior lobe of pronotum with distinct, broad swelling medially (Fig. 4a); scutellum distinctly convex (Fig. 4a), covered with short recumbent setae (as in Fig. 11h); endosoma membranous with serrate lobe subapically (Figs 12j, l); distal part of ductus seminis (dss) broad, caliciform with broad transparent portion dorsally, sclerotized plate at base of dss relatively small, weakly elongate (Figs 12j, k); left paramere C-shaped, apical process relatively broad, with large outgrowth baso-laterally, weakly arcuate and broadened in dorsal view, sensory lobe moderately developed, weakly pointed (Figs 12m, n); right paramere with moderately long apical process and weakly developed sensory lobe (Fig. 12o); bursa copulatrix largely membranous; seminal depository membranous, broadly developed; ringed gland apparently absent (Fig. 18a); sclerotization of ventral labiate plate broad, tapering towards its posterior part.</p> <p>Description. Male. COLORATION (Fig. 4a, 7d). Dorsum dark brown to black. Head. Varying from dark brown with developed dark yellow mottling to entirely black; antennal segment I dark brown, narrowly whitish basally; segment II dark yellow on basal half, dark brown on apical half to entirely dark brown, always with narrow whitish annulation on extreme apex; antennal segments III and IV dark brown; labium dark brown to black. Thorax. Pronotum. Black. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Black. Thoracic pleura. Black; metathoracic scent gland evaporative areas fuscous, contrastingly yellow at posterior one-fourth. Hemelytron. Dark brown with indistinct yellow tinge on clavus and middle of corium; cuneus with contrastingly yellow stripe along basal margin; membrane fuscous, veins darker. Legs. Procoxa dark castaneous to black; meso- and meta coxae yellow broadly tinged with dark castaneous or dark brown; femora black with yellow band near apex; tibiae dark brown; tarsi dark brown, weakly tinged with yellow. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE (Figs 4a, 7d). Head. Covered with fine, recumbent, and semi-recumbent setae; antennal segment I shiny, glabrous, only with two to three short, stiff, erect setae apically; segment II almost glabrous with fine, sparse setae on apical part; segments III and IV covered with rather sparse, fine, semi-recumbent setae, segment IV with setae denser than segment III; labium covered with fine, semi-recumbent, relatively dense setae. Thorax. Pronotum. Covered with very fine, short, recumbent setae. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Covered with short semi-recumbent setae. Hemelytron. Covered with sparse setae. STRUCTURE. Head. Antennal segment I weakly broadened toward apex; segment II thin, almost two times thinner than segment I, cylindrical (Figs 4a, 7d). Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe with distinct, broad swelling medially (Fig. 4a, 7d). Scutellum. With broad, strongly convex, longitudinal swelling medially (Fig. 4a, 7d). Abdomen. Genitalia. Endosoma membranous with relatively large, sclerotized, serrate lobe subapically (Figs 12j–l); distal part of ductus seminis (dss) broad, caliciform with broad transparent portion dorsally, base of dss with small sclerotized plate (Figs 12j–l); ductus seminis short and thick (Fig. 12l); left paramere C-shaped, apical process relatively broad, with large outgrowth baso-laterally, weakly arcuate and broadened in dorsal view (Figs 12m, n); sensory lobe moderately developed, weakly pointed (Figs 12m, n); right paramere sickle-shaped with weakly developed sensory lobe (Fig. 12o).</p> <p>Female. Like male in coloration, texture, vestiture, and structure. Genitalia. Bursa copulatrix largely membranous (Fig. 18a); seminal depository membranous, broadly developed (Fig. 18a); ringed gland absent; sclerotization of ventral labiate plate broad, tapering towards its posterior part.</p> <p>Measurements. (♂ / ♀, *: holotype measurements): Body. Length: 5.6–6.6*/6.4, width 2.0*–2.1/2.1. Head. Length: 0.5–0.56/0.5, 0.55*, width: 1.1–1.2*/1.1, interocular distance 0.4–0.5* /0.4. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.65–0.70 /0.45, 0.56*, II: 2.8–3.0, 2.95*, III: 4.3–4.5 /4.1, 4.25*, IV: 3.0*–3.5. Labium. Length of segment I: 0.8–0.95*/0.95, II: 0.86–0.87*/1.0, III: 0.83*–0.96/0.9, IV: 0.4–0.43*/0.45. Pronotum. Length: 0.86–1.0*/0.85, width of anterior margin: 1.0–1.1*/0.95, length of lateral margin: 0.9–1.0*/0.95, width of posterior margin: 1.96– 2.25*/2.25.</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet is taken from the Greek words calyx meaning cup and forma meaning shape and is used to the denote cup-like structure of the distal part of ductus seminis.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown</p> <p>Distribution. Ecuador (Orellana), Peru (Madre de Dios).</p> <p>Remarks. Most like P. caudatus and P. parallelus in sharing the scutellum covered with short, semi recumbent setae. It can be distinguished by the distal portion of ductus seminis inside endosoma (dss) caliciform, without any folding on the medial, transparent portion of dorsal part of dss.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♂: Peru: Madre de Dios, Pantiacolla Lodge, 2–7 km NW, El Mirador Trial, 450–700 m, Alto Madre de Dios River, 12º39’10’’S, 71º15’28’’W, R. <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-71.257774&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-12.652778" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -71.257774/lat -12.652778)">Brooks</a>, Peru 1B00 088, 24 <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-71.257774&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-12.652778" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -71.257774/lat -12.652778)">Oct</a>, 2000, ex: on Xylariaceae; SM 0 268959 KUNHM –ENT (KU); Paratypes: 1 ♂, 2 ♀: the same data as for holotype except for: 1 ♀: SM 0 268983, 1 ♀: SM 0 168958, 1 ♂: 400 m, 12º39’22’’S, 71º13’55’’W, R. Brooks, Peru 1B00 111, 24 Oct, 2000, ex: gilled mushrooms, SM 0 270712 (KU); 1 ♂, 1 ♀: Ecuador: Orellana: <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-76.144165&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-0.6319445" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -76.144165/lat -0.6319445)">Tiputini Biodiversity Station</a>, 216 m, 00º37′55″S; 76º08′39″W, 6 Feb 1999, T. L. Erwin, et al. collectors; Insecticidal fogging of mostly bare green leaves, some with covering of lichenous or bryophytic plants in terre firme forest, Lot 2079, Transect T –9; 1 ♂: the same data except for Lot #1960, Transect # T –7 (USNM).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE41FFADFF5113D640E1FB08	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE42FFADFF5115164078F87E.text	039587FBAE42FFADFF5115164078F87E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus carmelitanus Carvalho & Fontes	<div><p>Peltidocylapus carmelitanus Carvalho &amp; Fontes</p> <p>Peltidocylapus carmelitanus Carvalho &amp; Fontes, 1968: 276, figs 1–4 (sp. nov.).</p> <p>Peltidocylapus carmelitanus: Carvalho &amp; Froeschner, 1987: 192 (list); Schuh, 1995: 32 (catalog), 2002–2013 (catalog online); Gorczyca 2006: 17 (catalog).</p> <p>Remarks. The type specimens of Peltidocylapus carmelitanus Carvalho &amp; Fontes, Peltidocylapus tapirapensis Carvalho, Cylapinus minusculus Carvalho, and Cylapoides unicolor Carvalho were stored in the National Museum (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). The museum was destroyed in fire in 2018 and therefore these specimens were not available for my study. Based on the description of adpressed setae, the shape of aedeagus without sclerites and with well-developed distal, sclerotized portion of ductus seminis and secondary gonopore and the shape of parameres (Carvalho &amp; Fontes 1968: Figs 2–4) it is likely that P. carmelitanus belongs to Peltidocylapus as here defined. However, investigation of specimens belonging to this species is required to correctly ascertain its placement.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution: Brazil (Minas Gerais).</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♂: Carmo do Rio Claro, Minos Gerais, 1–1958, Carvalho &amp; Becker col. (Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, not examined); paratypes: 2 ♀♀: the same data as in holotype (Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, not examined).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE42FFADFF5115164078F87E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE43FFACFF5110AE4610F877.text	039587FBAE43FFACFF5110AE4610F877.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus caudatus Wolski 2021	<div><p>Peltidocylapus caudatus new species</p> <p>(Figs 4b, 8f, 11g –j, 12p–u)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of features: dorsum dark brown-black (Fig. 4b); antennal segment II with very narrow, white annulation apically, much narrower than half of interocular distance dorsum dark brownblack (Fig. 4b); posterior lobe of pronotum with distinct, broad swelling medially (Figs 4b, 11g); scutellum distinctly convex medially, covered with short, recumbent setae (Figs 4b, 11g, h); endosoma membranous, without any sclerites or sclerotized lobes (Figs 12 p–r); distal part of ductus seminis (dss) with broad transparent portion dorsally, which is furnished with sclerotized, elongate, longitudinal folding medially, base of dss with broad sclerotized plate (Figs 12 p–r); left paramere C-shaped, apical process thin in lateral and dorsal views, with large outgrowth baso-laterally, curved and thin in dorsal view (Figs 12s, t); right paramere sickle-shaped, with relatively long apical process (Figs 12u).</p> <p>Description. Male. COLORATION (Figs 4b). Dorsum from fuscous with black areas to entirely black. Head. Black with broad yellow areas; antenna dark brown; segment I narrowly pale basally; segment II with very narrow white annulation labium dark brown to black. Thorax. Pronotum. Black. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Black. Thoracic pleura. Blackish; metathoracic scent gland evaporative areas fuscous, narrowly yellowish posteriorly. Hemelytron. Black; medial portion of clavus and subapical part of corium broadly pitchy black. Legs. Procoxa black; meso- and meta coxae fuscous dark yellow; femora dark castaneous with yellow band near apex; tibiae dark brown; tarsi dark brown. Abdomen. Dark castaneous black. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE. Head. Covered with fine, recumbent, and semi-recumbent vestiture; antennal segment I shiny, glabrous, with two to three short, stiff, erect setae apically; segment II almost glabrous, with fine, sparse setae on apical part; segments III and IV covered with rather sparse, fine, semi-recumbent setae, segment IV with setae denser than segment III; labium covered with fine, semi-recumbent, relatively dense setae. Thorax. Pronotum. Covered with very fine, short, recumbent setae. Scutellum. Covered with very short, fine, recumbent setae (Fig. 11h). Hemelytron. Covered with very short and sparse setae. STRUCTURE. Head. Antennal segment I gradually becoming broadened toward apex (Fig. 4b); segment II thin, almost cylindrical, weakly broadened apically (Fig. 4b). Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe with distinct, broad swelling medially (Fig. 4b, 11g). Scutellum. With strongly convex, broad swelling medially (Fig. 4b, 11g). Abdomen. Genitalia. Endosoma membranous, without any sclerites or sclerotized lobes; distal part of ductus seminis (dss) with broad transparent portion dorsally, which is furnished with sclerotized, elongate, longitudinal folding medially, base of dss with broad sclerotized plate (Figs 12 p–r). Left paramere C–shaped, apical process thin in lateral and dorsal views, with large outgrowth baso-laterally, curved and thin in dorsal view (Figs 12s, t). Right paramere sickle-shaped, with relatively long apical process (Fig. 12u).</p> <p>Measurements. (*: holotype measurements): Body. Length: 6.0*–6.6, width 2.1*–2.3. Head. Length: 0.50– 0.55*, width: 1.1*, interocular distance 0.4*. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.64–0.66*, II: 3.25*–3.40, III: 3.6*– 4.5, IV: 3.0 (partly broken in holotype). Labium. Length of segment I: 0.95–0.97*, II: 0.98–1.00*, III: 1.00*–1.20, IV: 0.44–0.46*. Pronotum. Length: 0.95*–1.10, width of anterior margin: 1.10*–1.20, length of lateral margin: 0.95*–1.10, width of posterior margin: 2.20*–2.30.</p> <p>Female. Unknown.</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet is taken from the Latin cauda meaning tail and is used to denote the strongly developed, tail-like lateral outgrowth of the left paramere.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Ecuador (Orellana), Peru (Madre de Dios).</p> <p>Remarks. Most like P. calyciformis and P. parallelus in sharing scutellum with short, semi-recumbent setae. It can be, however, easily distinguished by the presence of medial, sclerotized folding on the transparent, dorsal portion of distal portion of ductus seminis inside endosoma.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype (♂): Ecuador: Orellana: Tiputini Biodiversity Station, 216 m, 0037′55″S; 7608′39″W, 22 October 1998, T. L. Erwin, et al. collectors; Insecticidal fogging of mostly bare green leaves, some with covering of lichenous or bryophytic plants in terre firme forest, Lot 1970, Transect T –8; paratype: 1 ♂: PERU: Madre de Dios, Cocha Salvador, Reserved Zone Manu National Park, 310 m, 120′13″S; 7131′36″W, 20 October 2000, R. Brooks, Peru 1 B00 049, ex. On Xylariaceae; SM 0 267535 KUNHM –ENT (KU).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE43FFACFF5110AE4610F877	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE4CFFA3FF5110AE435FF99E.text	039587FBAE4CFFA3FF5110AE435FF99E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus cerbereus (Distant 1883)	<div><p>Peltidocylapus cerbereus (Distant, 1883)</p> <p>(Figs 4c, 7e)</p> <p>Valdasus cerbereus Distant, 1883: 244 (sp. nov.); Carvalho &amp; Dolling 1976: 794 (discussion of type).</p> <p>Cylapus cerbereus: Bergroth 1920: 71 (list).</p> <p>Cylapus (Cylapus) cerbereus: Carvalho 1957: 29 (catalog).</p> <p>Peltidocylapus cerbereus: Carvalho &amp; Fontes 1968: 276 (list); Carvalho &amp; Dolling 1976: 794 (discussion of type); Schuh, 1995: 32 (catalog), 2002–2013 (online catalog); Gorczyca 2006a: 18 (catalog).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of features: overall dorsal coloration brown (Fig. 4c); antennal segment II with apical, white annulation relatively broad, as wide as half of interocular distance (Fig. 4c); scutellum with weakly developed medial, longitudinal swelling (Fig. 4c); basolateral angle of scutellum with distinct, yellow patch (Fig. 4c); hemelytron brown, clavus with short yellow stripe subapically (Fig. 4c).</p> <p>Redescription. Female. COLORATION (Fig. 4c, 7e). Dorsum light castaneous with dark brown with and yellow areas. Head. Dark yellow brown; antennal segment I dark castaneous, narrowly yellow basally; segments II–IV dark brown; segment II yellow at basal one fourth and at extreme apex; labium dark yellow brown. Thorax. Pronotum. Dark brown. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Dark brown; scutellum with two yellow patches, each situated basolaterally and with small, yellow spot apically. Thoracic pleura. Dark brown; proepimeron with narrow, yellow stripe along posterior and ventral margin; metathoracic scent gland evaporative areas yellow. Hemelytron. Mostly light castaneous; inner portion of corium dark yellow; clavus with short, yellow stripe near apex, bordering claval suture; membrane grey, weakly tinged with yellow. Legs. Procoxa dark castaneous, tinged with dark yellow and red; meso- and metacoxae yellow, tinged with red; femora brown; pro- and mesofemora tinged with yellow; metafemur with broad yellow band basally and narrower yellow band near apex; tibiae and tarsi dark yellow brown. Abdomen. Dark castaneous tinged with red and yellow. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE. Head. Covered with fine, sparse, semirecumbent and erect setae; antennal segment I shiny, covered with a few fine, erect setae; segment II very sparsely covered with semi-recumbent fine, short setae; segments III and IV with relatively dense, semi-recumbent setae; labium with sparse, relatively long, fine, semi-recumbent vestiture. Thorax. Pronotum. Covered with short, fine, recumbent setae. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Covered with short, fine, recumbent, sparse setae. Thoracic pleura. Covered with relatively dense setae. Hemelytron. Covered with short, fine, recumbent, sparse setae. STRUCTURE (Fig. 4c, 7e). Head. Antennal segment I weakly thickened medially; segment II thin, about two times thinner than segment I, almost cylindrical, weakly broadened apically (Fig. 4c). Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe with indistinct rib medially (Fig 4c). Scutellum. With weakly convex, narrow, longitudinal medial swelling (Fig 4c).</p> <p>Measurements. Lectotype ♀: Body. Length: 4.5, width 1.6. Head. Length: 0.42, width: 0.95, interocular distance 0.3. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.40, II: 1.85, III: 2.20, IV: 3.00. Labium. Length of segment I: 0.70, II: 0.75, III: 0.62, IV: 0.32. Pronotum. Length: 0.60, width of anterior margin: 0.66, length of lateral margin: 0.63, width of posterior margin: 1.40.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown, collected on fallen trees covered with black fungi (Distant, 1883).</p> <p>Distribution. Distribution: Panama (Chiriquí).</p> <p>Remarks. Most like P. nubilus in sharing relatively small body (smaller than 5.0 mm) and corium uniformly colored (Figs 4c, 5a). P. cerbereus can be distinguished by the presence of pale patches on each basolateral angle of scutellum and white annulation on apex of antennal segment II.</p> <p>Type material. Lectotype ♀: Lectotype (round label); Bugaba, Panama, Champion; B.C.A Hem. I, Cylapus erebeus (BMNH).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE4CFFA3FF5110AE435FF99E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE4CFFA2FF5116E94031F9A3.text	039587FBAE4CFFA2FF5116E94031F9A3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus ecuadorensis Wolski 2021	<div><p>Peltidocylapus ecuadorensis new species</p> <p>(Figs 4d, 13a–f, 18b–d, 21h, p)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of characters: dorsum dark brown-black (Fig. 4d); antennal segment II with white annulation on apex that is much narrower than half of interocular distance (Fig. 4d); posterior lobe of pronotum with distinct, broad swelling medially (Fig. 4d); scutellum distinctly convex, with long, dense, erect setae (Fig. 4d); endosoma membranous (Figs 13a–c); distal part of ductus seminis (dss) broad, caliciform with broad transparent portion dorsally, base of dss with broad sclerotized plate (Figs 13a); left paramere C-shaped, apical process relatively broad, with large outgrowth baso-laterally, weakly arcuate and broadened in dorsal view (Figs 13d, e), sensory lobe moderately developed, weakly pointed (Fig. 13d); right paramere with moderately long apical process and weakly developed sensory lobe (Fig. 13j); bursa copulatrix ovoid (Fig. 18b, c); sclerotized rings large, kidney-shaped and occupying most of bursa copulatrix (Figs 18b, c); sclerotization of ventral labiate plate broad, nearly triangular (Fig. 18d).</p> <p>Description. Male. COLORATION (Fig. 4d). Dorsum dark brown to black. Head. Fuscous, broadly tinged with yellow; antenna dark brown; segment I tinged with dark yellow, narrowly yellow basally; labium dark brown to black; segment I broadly tinged with yellow. Pronotum. Black. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Black; scutellum dark brown medially, with indistinct, dirty yellow tinge on basolateral angle. Thoracic pleura. Dark brown; metathoracic scent gland evaporative areas fuscous, broadly tinged with yellow posteriorly. Hemelytron. Dark brown to black. Legs. Procoxa dark brown; meso- and metacoxae yellow, tinged with dark brown; femora, tibiae, and tarsi dark brown; each femur with yellow band near apex; metafemur broadly tinged with yellow basally. Abdomen. Dark brown-black tinged with yellow. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE (Fig. 4d). Head. Covered with fine, short, sparse, semi-recumbent and erect setae; antennal segment I shiny, with a few fine, stiff, erect setae, being denser apically; segment II very sparse, semi-recumbent, short, fine setae being denser apically. Thorax. Scutellum. Covered with long, dense, erect setae (as in Fig. 11l). Hemelytron. Covered with short, fine, semi-recumbent setae. STRUCTURE (Fig. 4d). Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe with broad swelling medially. Scutellum. With broad, strongly convex longitudinal swelling medially. Abdomen. Genitalia. Endosoma membranous without any sclerites; distal part of ductus seminis (dss) broad, caliciform with broad transparent portion dorsally, base of dss with broad sclerotized plate (Figs 13a–c). Left paramere C-shaped, apical process relatively broad, with large outgrowth baso-laterally, weakly arcuate and broadened in dorsal view (Figs 13d, e), sensory lobe moderately developed, weakly pointed (Fig. 13d). Right paramere with moderately long apical process and weakly developed sensory lobe (Fig. 13f).</p> <p>Female. Like male in coloration, structure, texture, and vestiture. Genitalia. Bursa copulatrix ovoid (Fig. 18b, c); sclerotized rings large, occupying most of bursa copulatrix, kidney-shaped (Figs 18b, c); sclerotization of ventral labiate plate broad, nearly triangular (Fig. 18d).</p> <p>Measurements. (♂ / ♀, *: holotype measurements): Body. Length: 6.10*/6.20–6.90, width 2.0*/2.20. Head. Length: 0.50*/0.56–0.60, width: 1.15*/1.16–1.20, interocular distance 0.40*/0.42. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.66*/0.66–0.76, II: 2.95*/3.0, III: 3.95*/5.0, IV: 3.75*/4.5. Labium. Length of segment I: 0.9*/0.9, II: 0.87*/0.95, III: 1.0*/1.0, IV: 0.46*/0.46. Pronotum. Length 0.95*/1.0–1.05, width of anterior margin: 1.10*/1.20–1.30, length of lateral margin: 1.00*/1.00–1.05, width of posterior margin: 2.20*/2.30.</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the type locality.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Ecuador (Sucumbíos), Venezuela (Amazonas).</p> <p>Remarks. Most like P. simplex in sharing the scutellum covered with long, erect setae (Fig. 11l). It can be distinguished by the presence of distinct lateral outgrowth of left paramere apical process (Figs 13d, e).</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♂: Ecuador: Sucumbíos Sacha Lodge, 270 m, 028′14″S; 7627′35″W, 24 Mar 1999; R. Brooks, ECU 1B99 030, ex. fungus covered log; SM0158454 KUNHM – ENT; paratypes: 3 ♀: the same data as in holotype except: SM0155113; SM0155115 (KU); SM0 155123; 1 ♂: Venezuela, T. F. Amaz., Cerro de la Neblina Basecamp, 140 m, 050′N, 6610′W, 21–28 February 1985; Malaise trap in forest P.J. &amp; P.M. Spangler, R.A. Faitoute, W.E. Steiner collectors (USNM).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE4CFFA2FF5116E94031F9A3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE4DFFA1FF5116AD41AAFA7C.text	039587FBAE4DFFA1FF5116AD41AAFA7C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus festinabundus (Bergroth 1922) Wolski 2021	<div><p>Peltidocylapus festinabundus (Bergroth, 1922) comb. nov.</p> <p>(Fig. 4e)</p> <p>Cylapus festinabundus Bergroth, 1922: 3 (sp. nov.).</p> <p>Cylapus festinabundus: Schuh 1995: 23 (catalog), 2002–2013 (online catalog); Gorczyca 2006: 15 (catalog).</p> <p>Cylapus (Cylapus) festinabundus: Carvalho 1957: 30 (catalog).</p> <p>Peltidocylapus festinabundus: Carvalho &amp; Fontes 1968: 276 (list).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of features: dorsum brown with yellow areas (Fig. 4e); antennal segment II with very narrow, white annulation apically (Fig. 4e); lateral portion of pronotum broadly yellow (Fig. 4e); scutellum with very weakly convex, narrow medial, longitudinal swelling (Fig. 4e); hemelytron brown with yellow stripes (Fig. 4e).</p> <p>Redescription. Male. COLORATION (Fig. 4e). Dorsum dark brown with yellow areas. Head. Fuscous yellow; antennal segment I dark yellow brown to dark brown, narrowly white basally; segment II dark brown to fuscous with whitish apex; segments III and IV fuscous; labium dark brown, tinged with yellow. Thorax. Pronotum. Dark brown with broad yellow tinge laterally. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Dark brown with two yellow patches, each situated baso-laterally. Thoracic pleura. Proepisternum and proepimeron yellow; ventral half of proepisternum and narrow anteroventral portion of proepimeron dark castaneous; remaining pleura dark brown; metathoracic scent gland evaporative areas yellow. Hemelytron. Dark brown to fuscous with large yellow areas; embolium yellow; R+M vein with yellow, longitudinal patch medially and with smaller round patch subapically; endocorium with indistinct, longitudinal yellow tinge; anal vein yellow along entire its length; membrane fuscous, weakly tinged with yellow medially. Legs. Procoxa dark castaneous; meso- and metacoxae yellow, weakly tinged with red; femora dark yellow brown; meso- and metafemora with yellow patch near apex; meso- and metatibiae brown at basal half, dark brown at apical one-fourth, with broad, yellow band near apex; meso- and metatarsi dark brown. Abdomen. Dark castaneous to dark red tinged with yellow. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE (Fig. 4e). Thorax. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Covered with long, erect setae and with shorter, semi-recumbent setae. Hemelytron. Covered with semi-recumbent and erect setae. STRUCTURE (Fig. 4e). Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe flat. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Scutellum with weakly convex, narrow longitudinal, medial swelling.</p> <p>Female. Like male in coloration, structure, texture, and vestiture.</p> <p>Measurements. ♂ / ♀. Body. Length: 5.6/5.6, width 1.75/2.0. Head. Length: 0.45/0.5, width: 1.1/1.1, interocular distance 0.45/0.45. Antenna (female, missing in male). Length of segment I: 0.65, II: 2.5, III: 2.75, IV: (missing). Labium (male, immeasurable in female). Length of segment I: 0.62, II: 0.60, III: 0.60, IV: 0.40. Pronotum. Length 0.8/0.75, width of anterior margin: 0.95/0.85, length of lateral margin: 0.9/0.85, width of posterior margin: 1.75/1.8.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Peru (Cuzco).</p> <p>Remarks. This species possesses a metathoracic ostiolar canal that is weakly raised above evaporative areas, the ostiolar peritreme is oval and moderately raised (as in Fig. 10d), and the tarsus with tarsomere I is two times shorter than II and III combined (as in Figs 11j, o). These characters do not fit the diagnosis of Cylapus where the ostiolar canal is strongly raised, the peritreme is arcuate and sharply pointed (Fig. 10c) and tarsomere I is as long or longer than II and III tarsomeres combined. The combination of these characters is found in the genus Peltidocylapus as defined in the present paper, and C. festinabundus is here transferred from Cylapus to Peltidocylapus.</p> <p>P. festinabundus is like P. cerbereus, P. nubilus, and P. picatus in sharing indistinct, weakly convex longitudinal medial swelling on scutellum. It can be distinguished by the yellow, large patch on lateral portion of pronotum.</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♂: Peru (Callanga) (NHRS, not examined).</p> <p>Additional examined material. ♀ and ♂: Hoch Peru (NHRS).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE4DFFA1FF5116AD41AAFA7C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE4EFFA0FF5115DA43FEFD2C.text	039587FBAE4EFFA0FF5115DA43FEFD2C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus nubilus (Distant 1893)	<div><p>Peltidocylapus nubilus (Distant, 1893)</p> <p>(Fig. 5a)</p> <p>Cylapus nubilus Distant, 1893: 421 (sp. nov).</p> <p>Cylapus nubilus: Bergroth 1920: 71 (list); Carvalho &amp; Dolling 1976: 803 (discussion of type).</p> <p>Cylapus (Cylapus) nubilus: Carvalho 1957: 30 (catalog).</p> <p>Peltidocylapus nubilus: Carvalho &amp; Fontes 1968: 276 (list); Carvalho &amp; Dolling 1976: 803 (discussion of type); Schuh 1995: 32 (catalog), 2002–2013 (online catalog); Gorczyca 2006a: 18 (catalog).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of characters: dorsum mostly dark brown; antennal segment II entirely dark brown; pronotal disc without any swelling medially; scutellum with weakly convex, narrow longitudinal swelling medially (Fig 5a).</p> <p>Description. Female. COLORATION (Fig 5a). Dark brown with small yellow areas. Head. Dark brown; antenna and labium dark brown. Thorax. Pronotum, scutellum, and mesoscutum. Dark brown. Thoracic pleura. Dark brown; metathoracic scent gland evaporative areas yellow. Hemelytron. Dark brown; clavus with small yellowish patch subapically, bordering claval suture. Legs. Dark brown with brown areas; femora with dark yellow band near apex. Abdomen. Dark brown, tinged with dark yellow. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE (Fig 5a). Thorax. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Covered with short, fine, recumbent setae. Hemelytron. Covered with vestigial, adpressed vestiture. STRUCTURE (Fig 5a). Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe flat. Scutellum. With weakly convex, narrow longitudinal medial swelling.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Measurements. Lectotype ♀. Body. Length: 4.40, width 1.40. Head. Length: 0.45, width: 0.97, interocular distance 0.32. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.52, II: 1.6, III and IV broken. Labium. Immeasurable, obscured by clue. Pronotum. Length: 0.67, width of anterior margin: 0.82, length of lateral margin: 0.62, width of posterior margin: 1.45.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Panama (Chiriquí).</p> <p>Remarks. Most like P. cerbereus in sharing relatively small body (smaller than 5.0 mm) and corium uniformly colored (Figs 4c, 5a). P. cerbereus can be distinguished by the lack of pale patches on each basolateral angle of scutellum and uniformly colored antennal segment II.</p> <p>Type material. Lectotype ♀: Lectotype (round label); V. de Chiriqui 25–4000 ft. Champion; B.C.A. Hem. I Cylapus nubilus (BMNH).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE4EFFA0FF5115DA43FEFD2C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE4FFFA6FF5113274368F8B2.text	039587FBAE4FFFA6FF5113274368F8B2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus pallidus Wolski 2021	<div><p>Peltidocylapus pallidus, new species</p> <p>(Figs 5b, 13g –l)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of features: hemelytron yellow with large dark castaneous patch at apical half of clavus and apical one-third of corium (Fig. 5b); antennal segment II with white annulation on apex that is much narrower than half of interocular distance (Fig. 5b); sclerotized, distal portion of ductus seminis inside endosoma (dss) relatively short, broadened toward apex (Figs 13g –i); base of dss with broad and long sclerotized plate (Figs 13g); portion beneath dss entirely occupied by sclerotized, serrate lobe (Figs 13g, h); left paramere apical process with large outgrowth originating from baso-dorsal portion; apical process massive, long, and weakly arcuate in dorsal view (Figs 13 j, k).</p> <p>Redescription. Male. COLORATION (Fig. 5b). Dorsum dark castaneous-yellow. Head. Fuscous dark castaneous with large yellow areas; antennal segment I dark red, tinged with yellow; segment II dark brown, narrowly yellow basally and apically; segments III and IV dark brown; labial segments I and II dark castaneous; segment II largely tinged with yellow apically; segment III yellow; segment IV fuscous, narrowly tinged with yellow basally.</p> <p>Thorax. Pronotum. Dark castaneous. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Dark castaneous; scutellum with two large yellow patches each situated baso-laterally. Thoracic pleura. Dark castaneous; metathoracic scent gland evaporative areas reddish, weakly tinged with fuscous, with yellow stripe along posterior margin. Hemelytron. Yellow with large dark castaneous patch at apical half of clavus and apical one-third of corium; clavus dark brown; membrane grey. Legs. Procoxa dark castaneous; meso- and metacoxae yellow; hindleg dark yellow; metafemur tinged with brown apically; remaining legs missing. Abdomen. Dark red, tinged with dark yellow. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE (Fig. 5b). Thorax. Scutellum. Covered with relatively long, semi-recumbent and erect setae. Hemelytron. Covered with short, semi-recumbent setae. STRUCTURE (Fig. 5b). Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe flat. Scutellum. With moderately convex, broad, longitudinal swelling medially. Abdomen. Genitalia. sclerotized, distal portion of ductus seminis inside endosoma (dss) relatively short, broadened toward apex (Figs 13g –i); base of dss with broad and long sclerotized plate (Figs 13g); portion beneath dss entirely occupied by sclerotized, serrate lobe (Figs 13g, h); left paramere apical process with large outgrowth originating from baso-dorsal portion, apical process massive, long, and weakly arcuate in dorsal view (Figs 13 j, k).</p> <p>Measurements. Holotype ♂. Body. Length: 4.5, width 1.55. Head. Length 0.4, width 0.87, interocular distance 0.27. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.4, II: 1.57, III: 1.60, IV (partly broken). Labium. Length of segment I: 0.63, II: 0.70, III: 0.70, IV: 0.47. Pronotum. Length: 0.70, width of anterior margin: 0.66, length of lateral margin: 0.73, width of posterior margin: 1.43.</p> <p>Female. Unknown.</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet is taken from the Latin pallidus meaning pale and is used to denote the large pale patch on base of hemelytron.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Peru (Madre de Dios).</p> <p>Remarks. Most like P. calyciformis, P. caudatus, P. ecuadorensis, P. parallelus, P. rugosus, P. scutellaris, P. simplex, and P. spinosus in sharing the broad, convex swelling in the middle of scutellum (Figs 4a, b, d, 5b, c, 6). It can be easily distinguished by the small body (&lt;5.0 mm) and the pale patch on basal half of corium (Fig. 5b)</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♂: Peru: Madre de Dios, Manu National Park, at UV light trap, 15 Aug 1980 – 30 Nov 1981, Charles H. Janson collectors; gift from The Burke Museum, mounted from alcohol 1986; CASENT 8420153 (CAS).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE4FFFA6FF5113274368F8B2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE54FFBAFF5115864658FB08.text	039587FBAE54FFBAFF5115864658FB08.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus parallelus Wolski 2021	<div><p>Peltidocylapus parallelus, new species</p> <p>(Figs 5c, 11l, 13m –r, 19a–c, 20g, 21i, q)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of features: dorsum dark brown black (Fig. 5c); antennal segment II with white annulation on apex that is much narrower than half of interocular distance (Fig. 5c); posterior lobe of pronotum with distinct, broad swelling medially (Fig. 5c); scutellum distinctly convex (Fig. 5c), covered with very short, semi-recumbent setae (Fig. 11l); endosoma membranous, with small sclerotized lobe apically (Figs 13m –o); distal sclerotized portion of ductus seminis short, not caliciform, lateral margins almost parallel (Fig. 13m, o); base of dss with small sclerotized plate (Fig. 13m); left paramere apical process relatively thick, weakly arcuate, with well-developed lateral outgrowth that is broad, long, weakly arcuate (Figs 13p, q); dorsal labiate plate with sclerotized rings paired, kidney-shaped, large, occupying most of bursa copulatrix (Figs 19a, b); ventral labiate plate with broad, club-like sclerotization (Fig. 19c).</p> <p>Description. Male. COLORATION (Fig. 5c). Dorsum dark brown to black to entirely black with indistinct, small yellowish areas. Head. Fuscous, tinged with yellow; antenna fuscous; antennal segment I weakly and narrowly tinged with yellow basally; segment II weakly tinged with dark yellow basally and with white indistinct, narrow annulation apically; labium dark brown to black. Thorax. Pronotum, mesoscutum, scutellum, and hemelytron. Uniformly black; scutellum sometimes weakly tinged with dark brown medial and with small yellowish patch apically. Thoracic pleura. Dark brown to black; metathoracic scent gland evaporative area dark brown its posterior portion contrastingly yellow. Abdomen. Black tinged with dark brown. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE (Fig. 5c). Thorax. Scutellum. Covered with very sparse, irregular, erect and semi-recumbent setae. Hemelytron. Covered with short, semi-recumbent setae. STRUCTURE (Fig. 5c). Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe with well-developed swelling medially. Scutellum. Scutellum with strongly convex, broad longitudinal swelling medially. Abdomen. Genitalia. Endosoma membranous, with small, sclerotized lobe apically (Figs 13m –o); distal sclerotized portion of ductus seminis short with lateral margins almost parallel (Fig. 13m, o); base of dss with small, sclerotized plate (Fig. 13m); left paramere apical process relatively thick, weakly arcuate, with well-developed lateral outgrowth that is broad, long, weakly arcuate (Figs 13p, q); right paramere sickle-shaped, apical process relatively short (Fig. 13r).</p> <p>Female. Like male in coloration, structure, texture, and vestiture. Genitalia. Bursa copulatrix with sclerotized rings paired, kidney-shaped, large, occupying most of bursa copulatrix (Figs 19a, b); ventral labiate plate with broad, club-like sclerotization (Fig. 19c).</p> <p>Measurements. (♂ / ♀, *: holotype measurements): Body. Length: 5.6*–5.9/6.3, width 1.85*–2.1/2.2–2.5. Head. Length. 0.5*–0.55/0.55, width: 1.1*/1.15, interocular distance 0.40*/0.4–0.43. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.56*–0.60/0.57–0.62, II: 2.55*/2.5–2.6, III: 4.0*/3.75–4.5, IV: 3.75*/3.25–4.0. Labium. Length of segment I: 0.76–0.875*/0.9, II: 0.82*–0.875/0.95, III: 0.82*–0.86/0.85, IV: 0.4*/0.47. Pronotum. Length. 0.95–1.05*/1.0, width of anterior margin: 0.95*–1.1/1.1–1.15, length of lateral margin: 0.95*/0.96, width of posterior margin: 2.0*– 2.05/2.15.</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet is used to denote the distal part of ductus seminis with nearly parallel lateral margins.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Ecuador, Guyana (Upper Demerara-Berbice).</p> <p>Remarks. Most like P. calyciformis and P. parallelus in sharing scutellum with short, semi-recumbent setae (Fig. 11h). It can be distinguished by the distal portion of ductus seminis inside endosoma nearly rectangular with almost parallel lateral margins (Fig. 13m, o).</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♂. Guyana: Region 8, Iwokrama Forest, Kabocalli Field Station, 60 m, 417’4’’S, 5880’35’’W, 5 Jun 2001, R. Brooks, Z. Falin, GUY 1BF01 138; SM 0 566791 KUHM –ENT (KU); paratypes: 2 ♀: the same data as in the holotype except: SM 0 566826; SM 0 566783; 1 ♀: Region 8, Iwokrama Forest, 1 m W Kurupukari Iwokrama Field Station 440’19’’S, 5841’4’’W, 60 m, 2 Jun 2001, R. Brooks, Z. Falin, GUY 1BF01 119, ex: Xylariaceae; SM 0 384983 KUHM –ENT (KU); 1 ♂: Coca 6–65 Ecuador (USNM).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE54FFBAFF5115864658FB08	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE55FFB9FF511503435BFCBC.text	039587FBAE55FFB9FF511503435BFCBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus picatus (Distant 1893)	<div><p>Peltidocylapus picatus (Distant, 1893)</p> <p>(Fig. 5d)</p> <p>Cylapus picatus Distant, 1893: 420, pl. 36, fig. 15 (sp. nov.)</p> <p>Cylapus picatus: Bergroth 1920: 71 (list); Carvalho &amp; Dolling 1976: 804 (discussion of type)</p> <p>Cylapus (Cylapus) picatus: Carvalho 1957: 30 (catalog)</p> <p>Peltidocylapus picatus: Carvalho &amp; Fontes 1968: 276 (list); Schuh 1995: 32 (catalog), 2002–2013 (online catalog); Gorczyca 2006a: 18 (catalog)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by following combination of characters: overall dorsal coloration brown (Fig. 5d); antennal segment II with apical, white annulation that is relatively broad, as wide as half of interocular distance (Fig. 5d); scutellum with yellow patches baso-laterally and apically, moderately convex with moderately developed, longitudinal, medial swelling (Fig. 5d); posterior lobe of pronotum flat. hemelytron dark brown (Fig. 5d); R+M vein with yellow patch medially (Fig. 5d); medial fracture with longitudinal, yellow patch subapically (Fig. 5d); claval suture with short longitudinal yellow stripe apically (Fig. 5d).</p> <p>Redescription. Female. COLORATION (Fig. 5d). Dark brown with yellow areas. Head. Dark yellow-fuscous; antennal segment I black; segment II brown dark yellow, narrowly black basally and with narrow yellow annulation apically; labium dark brown. Thorax. Pronotum. Dark brown. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Dark brown; mesoscutum weakly tinged with dark yellow near lateral margin; scutellum with two large patches each situated baso-laterally and with indistinct, longitudinal, dark yellow stripe, originating from medial part and terminating apically. Thoracic pleura. Proepisternum and proepimeron dark brown; remaining pleura black; ostiolar peritreme dark grey. Hemelytron. Dark brown; R +M vein with yellow patch medially; medial fracture with longitudinal, yellow patch subapically; claval suture with short longitudinal yellow stripe apically; membrane dark grey. Legs. Procoxa black; meso– and metacoxae dark yellow tinged with fuscous; mesofemur weakly tinged with dark yellow near apex; metafemur tinged with yellow basally and subapically; tibiae and tarsi dark yellow; tibiae narrowly black basally; protibia with narrow, dark brown annulation apically. Abdomen. Black. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE (Fig 5d). Thorax. Scutellum. Covered with two types of setae: one short, dense, and recumbent and other longer, sparse, and erect, Hemelytron. Covered with relatively dense, long, semi-recumbent setae. STRUCTURE (Fig 5d).</p> <p>Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe flat. Scutellum. With weakly convex, narrow longitudinal medial swelling.</p> <p>Male: Unknown.</p> <p>Measurements. Body. Length: 4.60, width 1.70. Head. Length: 0.40, width: 0.96, interocular distance 0.33. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.63, II: 1.65, III: 2.30, IV: 2.55. Labium. Length of segment I: 0.80, II: 0.68, III: 0.64, IV: 0.46. Pronotum. Length: 0.66, width of anterior margin: 0.96, length of lateral margin: 0.60, width of posterior margin: 1.50.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Panama (Bugaba).</p> <p>Remarks. Most like P. cerbereus and P. nubilus in sharing the relatively small body (&lt;5.0 mm) and scutellum with weakly convex, narrow medial, longitudinal swelling. In can be distinguished by the yellow patches on hemelytron (Fig. 5d).</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♀: Holotype (round label); Bugaba, Panama, Champion; B.C.A. Hem. I Cylapus nubilus (BMNH).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE55FFB9FF511503435BFCBC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE56FFB9FF51139741B1F8B6.text	039587FBAE56FFB9FF51139741B1F8B6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus politus (Poppius 1909)	<div><p>Peltidocylapus politus (Poppius)</p> <p>(Fig. 5e)</p> <p>Cylapus politus Poppius, 1909: 12, 43 (sp. nov.).</p> <p>Cylapus politus: Bergroth 1920: 71 (list).</p> <p>Cylapus (Cylapus) politus: Carvalho 1957: 30 (catalog).</p> <p>Peltidocylapus politus: Carvalho &amp; Fontes 1968: 276 (list); Schuh 1995: 32 (catalog), 2002–2013 (online catalog); Gorczyca 2006a: 18 (catalog).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the scutellum contrastingly yellow, smooth, impunctate; posterior lobe of pronotum flat; hemelytron dark castaneous with embolium, exocorium, and cuneus contrastingly yellow (Fig. 5e).</p> <p>Redescription. Female. COLORATION. Dorsum dark yellowish brown. Head. Vertex dark yellow; frons dark brown; remainder of head yellow; antennal segment I dark red; labium dark yellow, segment IV fuscous.</p> <p>Thorax. Pronotum. Calli dark castaneous; posterior lobe dark yellow tinged with castaneous. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Mesoscutum reddish; scutellum yellow. Thoracic pleura. Dark castaneous with dark yellow areas; scent gland evaporative areas yellow. Hemelytron. Dark castaneous yellow; embolium, exocorium, and cuneus yellow; endocorium and clavus castaneous; membrane dark grey. Legs. Coxae yellow; midleg dark yellow. Abdomen. Dark castaneous, tinged with yellow and brown. STRUCTURE, TEXTURE, AND VESTITURE. Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe flat. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Covered with relatively long, erect setae; scutellum impunctate, flat. Hemelytron. Covered with relatively long, erect, and semi-recumbent setae.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Measurements. Body. Length: 6.0, width 2.1. Head. Length: 0.70, width: 1.25, interocular distance 0.5. Antenna. Missing. Labium. Length of segment I: 0.70, II: 0.70, III: 0.7, IV: 0.40. Pronotum. Length: 0.85, width of anterior margin: 0.85, length of lateral margin: 0.9, width of posterior margin: 1.75.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Brazil (Santa Catarina).</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♀: S. Catarina Lüderwaldt. (ZMPA).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE56FFB9FF51139741B1F8B6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE57FFBFFF51172642E1F9E3.text	039587FBAE57FFBFFF51172642E1F9E3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus rugosus (Distant 1883)	<div><p>Peltidocylapus rugosus (Distant, 1883)</p> <p>(Figs 6a, 8g, 14a–e)</p> <p>Valdasus rugosus Distant, 1883: 245, pl. 24, fig. 10 (sp. nov.).</p> <p>Valdasus rugosus: Carvalho &amp; Dolling 1976: 806 (discussion of type).</p> <p>Cylapus (Peltidocylapus) rugosus: Bergroth 1920: 71 (list); Carvalho 1957: 31 (catalog)</p> <p>Peltidocylapus rugosus: Carvalho &amp; Fontes 1968: 276 (list); Carvalho &amp; Dolling 1976: 806 (discussion of type); Schuh 1995: 32 (catalog), 2002–2013 (online catalog); Gorczyca 2006a: 19 (catalog).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of features: dorsum dark brown (Fig. 6a); antennal segment II with relatively broad, apical, white annulation that is as wide as half of interocular distance (Fig. 6a); posterior lobe of pronotum with distinct swelling medially (Fig. 6a); scutellum distinctly convex, with longitudinal swelling medially (Fig. 6a); anal vein with short, yellow stripe subapically (Fig. 6a); endosoma membranous; distal sclerotized part of ductus seminis (dss) short, rectangular (Figs 14a, b); ventro-apical margin of ductus seminis inside endosoma with deep incision (Fig. 14b); left paramere apical process with short basolateral outgrowth (Figs 14c, d).</p> <p>Redescription. Female. COLORATION (Fig. 6a). Dorsum dark brown. Head. Dark brown with dark yellow areas medially and laterally; antenna dark brown; antennal segment II with relatively broad, apical, white annulation that is as wide as half of interocular distance; labium dark brown. Thorax. Pronotum, mesoscutum, scutellum and hemelytron. Dark brown; anal vein with short, yellow stripe subapically. Thoracic pleura. Dark brown; metathoracic scent gland evaporative areas tinged with dark yellow posteriorly. Legs. Pro– and mesocoxae dark brown; metacoxa yellow, dark brown basally; femora dark castaneous, with yellow annulation subapically; metafemur with broad, yellow annulation basally; tibiae dark castaneous; tarsi brown, tinged with dark yellow. Abdomen. Black, tinged with dark yellow. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE (Fig. 6a). Thorax. Mesoscutum, scutellum, and hemelytron. Covered with short, fine, dense, recumbent setae. STRUCTURE (Fig. 6a). Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe with distinct swelling medially. Scutellum. With strongly convex, broad longitudinal swelling medially. Hemelytron. Surface between R+M vein and medial fracture rugose. Abdomen. Genitalia. Endosoma membranous (Figs 14a, b); distal sclerotized part of ductus seminis (dss) short, rectangular, with transparent portion dorsally (Figs 14a, b); ventro-apical margin of ductus seminis inside endosoma with deep incision (Fig. 14b); left paramere C-shaped, apical process with short process basolaterally (Figs 14c, d); right paramere sickle-shaped (Figs 14e).</p> <p>Male. Like female in color, structure, texture, and vestiture.</p> <p>Measurements. ♂ / ♀, lecotype measurements second. Body. Length: 7.00/6.40, width 2.00/2.3. Head. Length: 0.51/0.50, width: 1.1/1.2, interocular distance 0.40/0.43. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.73/0.62, II: 2.6/2.75, III: 2.8/3.10, IV: 3.15/3.5. Labium (immeasurable in holotype). Length of segment I: 0.70, II: 0.87, III: 0.85, IV: 0.35. Pronotum. Length: 1.00/1.00, width of anterior margin: 1.10/1.10, length of lateral margin: 1.05/1.00, width of posterior margin: 2.20/2.20.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown, collected on fallen trees covered with black fungi (Distant 1883).</p> <p>Distribution. Costa Rica (Cartago), Guatemala (Senahu).</p> <p>Remarks. Most like P. scutellaris in sharing the clavus having a short, yellow stripe apically (Figs 6a, b), the distal portion of ductus seminis inside endosoma (dss) short, not caliciform with ventro-apical margin concave in the middle (Figs 14a, b, f, h), and the left paramere apical process lateral outgrowth short (Figs 14c, d, i, j). It can be distinguished by the presence of deeper incision on ventro-apical margin of the dss (Fig. 14b).</p> <p>Type material. Lectotype ♀: Senahu Vera Paz, Champion; B.C.A. Hem I Cylapus rugosus (BMNH).</p> <p>Additional examined material. ♂: Costa Rica: Cartago, P. N. Tapantí, 1150 m, 9º45’41”N, 83º47’5’’, 18 Jul 2000, J. Ashe, R. Brooks, Z. Falin, CR1ABF00 166, ex: logging fungus covered log.; SM0 207000 KUHM–ENT (KU).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE57FFBFFF51172642E1F9E3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE50FFBEFF51167143A8FAEC.text	039587FBAE50FFBEFF51167143A8FAEC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus scutellaris Poppius 1909	<div><p>Peltidocylapus scutellaris Poppius, 1909</p> <p>(Figs 6b, 11m –o, 14f–k)</p> <p>Cylapus (Peltidocylapus) scutellaris Poppius, 1909: 12, 43 (sp. nov.).</p> <p>Cylapus (Peltidocylapus) scutellaris: Bergroth 1920: 71 (list); Carvalho 1957: 31 (list).</p> <p>Peltidocylapus scutellaris: Carvalho &amp; Fontes 1968: 276 (list); Schuh 1995: 32 (catalog), 2002–2013 (online catalog); Gorczyca 2006a: 19: fig. 3 (catalog).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following combination of characters: antennal segment II with relatively broad, apical, white annulation width equal to half of interocular distance (Fig. 6b; Gorczyca 2006a: fig. 3); posterior lobe of pronotum with moderately developed swelling medially (Fig. 6b, 11m; Gorczyca 2006a: fig. 3); scutellum convex, with strongly developed, longitudinal medial swelling (Fig. 6b, 11m; Gorczyca 2006a: fig. 3); clavus with short, yellow stripe subapically (Fig. 6b; Gorczyca 2006a: fig. 3); endosoma membranous (Figs 14f–k); distal sclerotized portion of ductus seminis (dss) short, rectangular (Figs 14f); ventro–apical margin of ductus seminis inside endosoma with shallow incision (Fig. 14h); left paramere apical process with short outgrowth baso-dorsally (Figs 14i, j).</p> <p>Redescription. Male. COLORATION (Fig. 6b; Gorczyca 2006a: fig. 3). Dorsum varying from dark castaneous to dark brown. Head. Dark brown, tinged with yellow; antennal segment I dark castaneous; antennal segment II with relatively broad, apical, white annulation that is as wide as half of interocular distance; segments II–IV dark brown; labium dark castaneous. Thorax. Pronotum. Varying from dark castaneous to dark brown. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Varying from dark castaneous to dark brown with large, indistinct, dark yellow tinge baso-laterally. Thoracic pleura. Dark castaneous with dark yellow areas; metathoracic scent gland evaporative areas mostly fuscous, tinged with yellow posteriorly. Hemelytron. Dark castaneous to dark brown; clavus with short, yellow stripe subapically, bordering claval suture; membrane dark grey, weakly tinged with yellow medially. Legs. Procoxa dark castaneous narrowly tinged with yellow apically; meso- and metacoxae yellow tinged with dark brown basally; femora dark castaneous with pale yellow annulation subapically; meso- and metafemora with pale yellow annulation basally; tibiae and tarsi dark stramineous with dark brown areas. Abdomen. Dark castaneous. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE (Figs 6b, 11m). Thorax. Scutellum. Covered with two types of setae: one short, fine, recumbent, and other longer, covering medial swelling. Hemelytron. Covered with short, fine, semi-recumbent setae. STRUCTURE (Fig. 6b, 11m; Gorczyca 2006a: fig. 3). Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe with moderately developed swelling medially. Scutellum. With strongly convex, broad longitudinal medial swelling. Abdomen. Genitalia. endosoma membranous (Figs 14f–k); distal sclerotized portion of ductus seminis (dss) short, rectangular, its dorsal portion weakly sclerotized, transparent (Figs 14f); ventro-apical margin of ductus seminis inside endosoma with shallow incision (Fig. 14h); left paramere apical process with short outgrowth baso-dorsally (Figs 14i, j); right paramere sickle-shaped (Figs 14k).</p> <p>Measurements. ♂ (*: holotype measurements): Body. Length: 5.30–5.8*, width 1.90–1.90*. Head. Length: 0.50*, *, width: 1.00–1.10*, interocular distance 0.36*. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.58*–0.6, II: 2.30*–2.55, III: 2.75*–2.8, IV: 3.65–3.75*. Labium. Length of segment I: 0.66–0.72*, II: 0.78*–0.83, III: 0.71*–0.80, IV: 0.30*– 0.40. Pronotum. Length 0.80*–0.83, width of anterior margin: 0.93–0.96*length of lateral margin: 0.76*–0.90, width of posterior margin: 1.76–1.90*.</p> <p>Female. Unknown.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Costa Rica (Heredia), Ecuador (Guyas).</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♂: Ecuador, Bucay, Ohaus S., 5–12.6.05 (ZMPA).</p> <p>Additional examined material. ♂: Costa Rica: Heredia, La Selva Field Station, near Puerto Viejo, 21–28 March 1988 (USNM).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE50FFBEFF51167143A8FAEC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE52FFBDFF5110AE4147F893.text	039587FBAE52FFBDFF5110AE4147F893.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus simplex Wolski 2021	<div><p>Peltidocylapus simplex new species</p> <p>(Figs 6c, 8h, 14l–q, 19d, e, f)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by following set of features: dorsum dark brown-black (Fig. 6c); antennal segment II dark brown, tinged with dark yellow basally and with white annulation on apex that is much narrower than half of interocular distance (Fig. 6c); posterior lobe with strongly developed swelling medially (Fig. 6c); scutellum covered with long, erect setae, with strongly convex, longitudinal swelling medially (Fig. 6c); endosoma membranous, with large sclerotized, serrate lobe beneath sclerotized distal portion of ductus seminis (dss) (Figs 14l–n); dss broad and long, caliciform, with broad, weakly sclerotized, transparent portion dorsally (Fig; 14l); sclerotized plate on base of dss rather small, elliptical (Fig; 14l); left paramere apical process without any outgrowth (Figs. 14o, p); bursa copulatrix sclerotized rings large (Fig. 19d, e); ventral labiate plate with broad, irregularly shaped sclerotization.</p> <p>Description. Male. COLORATION (Fig. 6c). Dorsum dark brownish black. Head. Fuscous tinged with dark yellow; antennal segment I dark stramineous; segment II dark brown, tinged with dark yellow basally and with white annulation on apex that is much narrower than half of interocular distance; segments III and IV dark brown; labium varying from fuscous dark yellow, tinged with red to entirely black. Thorax. Pronotum. Varying from dark brown to black. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Mesoscutum varying from dark castaneous to black; scutellum varying from dark brown castaneous with two large dark yellow patches each situated baso-laterally to entirely black, apex with small dark yellow spot. Thoracic pleura. Proepimeron and proepisternum dark brown to black; remaining pleura dark brown. Hemelytron. Dark brown; cuneus tinged with red basally; membrane dark grey. Legs. Procoxa dark castaneous to black; meso- and metacoxae varying from yellow to dark yellow tinged with dark brown basally; proleg dark brown with more or dark yellow annulation subapically. Abdomen. Varying from castaneous with yellow areas to entirely black. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE (Fig. 6c). Thorax. Scutellum. Covered with long, erect setae. Hemelytron. Covered with dense, semi-recumbent and erect setae. STRUCTURE (Fig. 6c). Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe with strongly developed swelling medially. Scutellum. With strongly convex, broad longitudinal swelling medially. Abdomen. Genitalia. Endosoma membranous, with large sclerotized, serrate lobe beneath sclerotized distal portion of ductus seminis (dss) (Figs 14l, m, n); dss broad and long, caliciform, with broad, weakly sclerotized, transparent portion dorsally (Figs 14l, n); sclerotized plate on base of dss rather small, elliptical (Fig. 14l); left paramere C-shaped, apical process without lateral outgrowth (Figs 14o, p); right paramere sickle-shaped (Fig. 14q).</p> <p>Female. Like male in coloration, structure, texture, and vestiture. Genitalia. Bursa copulatrix trapezoidal (Figs 19d, e); sclerotized rings large, kidney-shaped (Figs 19d, e); ventral labiate plate with broad, irregularly shaped sclerotization.</p> <p>Measurements. (♂ / ♀, * holotype measurements): Body. Length: 6.2*–6.3/7.0, width 2.0–2.2*/2.5. Head. Length: 0.55*/0.55, width: 1.2*/1.25, interocular distance 0.4*/0.5. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.7*/0.7, II: 2.85–2.9*/3.05, III: 4.0*/4.1, IV: 2.45*/3.95. Labium. Length of segment I: 0.7*–0.62/0.94, II: 0.825*/1.0, III: 0.90*/0.97, IV: 0.35*/0.5. Pronotum. Length 1.0*–1.05/1.2, width of anterior margin: 1.05–1.1*/1.35, length of lateral margin: 0.95*–1.05/1.15, width of posterior margin: 2.15*–2.2/2.55.</p> <p>Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the Latin “simplex meaning simple and is used to denote the left paramere apical process without an outgrowth.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Ecuador (Orellana).</p> <p>Remarks. P. simplex is most like P. ecuadorensis by possessing long setae on the scutellum (Fig. 11l). In can be easily distinguished by the left paramere apical process devoid of an outgrowth (Figs 14o, p).</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♂: Ecuador: Orellana Yuturi Lodge, Rio Napo, 270 m, 032’54”S, 762’18’’W, 20 Mar 1999, R. Brooks, ECU 1B99 002, ex: fungus covered log; SM0156643 KUHM–ENT (KU); paratypes: ♀: the same data as in holotype except: 21 Mar 1999, ECU 1B99 014 (KU); ♂: Ecuador: Orellana, Tiputini Biodiversity Station, 216 m, 0 37’55”S, 7608’39’’W, 21 Oct 1998, T.L. Erwin et al. collectors; insecticidal fogging of mostly bare green leaves, some with covering of lichenous or bryophytic plants, Lot 1989, Trans. T–9; ♂: Ecuador: Limoncocha 031’S, 7638’W, 31 Mar ’74, El. 300 m, H. P. Stockwell (AMNH).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE52FFBDFF5110AE4147F893	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE53FFB3FF5114B4400EFCD8.text	039587FBAE53FFB3FF5114B4400EFCD8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus spinosus Wolski 2021	<div><p>Peltidocylapus spinosus new species</p> <p>(Figs 6d, 14r–u)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following combination of characters: dorsum dark brown-black (Fig. 6d); segment II dark brown, tinged with dark yellow basally and with white annulation on apex that is much narrower than half of interocular distance (Fig. 6d); posterior lobe of pronotum without any swelling (Fig. 6d); scutellum with moderately developed medial swelling (Fig. 6d); endosoma membranous, with four sclerites originating from base (Fig. 14r); sclerotized distal part of ductus seminis (dss) weakly developed (Fig. 14r); left paramere apical process thin in lateral view, strongly broadened basally when viewed dorsally (Figs 14s, t).</p> <p>Description. Male. COLORATION (Fig. 6d). Dorsum dark brownish black with small yellow areas. Head. Fuscous, tinged with yellow and dark castaneous; antennal segment I dark castaneous, with yellow, narrow annulation basally; segments II–IV dark brown, segment II tinged with dark yellow basally and with narrow annulation apically; labial segments I and II dark castaneous; segments III and IV dark yellow fuscous. Thorax. Pronotum. Black. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Black; scutellum with small, yellow spot apically. Thoracic pleura. Dark brownish black; proepimeron with narrow yellowish stipe along posterior and ventral margins. Hemelytron. Dark brown; medial fracture with small, yellow spot subapically; clavus with short, yellow stripe subapically, contiguous with claval suture; membrane dark grey weakly tinged with yellow medially. Legs. Procoxa dark castaneous; meso- and metacoxae yellow, tinged with dark castaneous basally; femora dark castaneous, with two yellow annulation, one broader situated medially and other narrower situated subapically; meso- and metafemora additionally with broad annulation basally; tibiae and tarsi dark brown. Abdomen. Black tinged with dark castaneous. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE (Fig. 6d). Thorax. Scutellum. Covered with two types of setae one short, recumbent, and other, sparser, longer, and erect. Hemelytron. Covered with relatively long, semi-recumbent and erect setae. STRUCTURE (Fig. 6d). Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior lobe flat. Scutellum. With moderately convex, broad longitudinal swelling medially. Abdomen. Genitalia. Endosoma membranous, with four sclerites originating from base (Fig. 14r); sclerotized distal part of ductus seminis (dss) weakly developed (Fig. 14r); left paramere C-shaped, apical process thin in lateral view, strongly broadened basally when viewed dorsally (Figs 14s, t); right paramere sickle-shaped (Fig. 14u).</p> <p>Female. Like male in coloration, structure, texture, and vestiture.</p> <p>Measurements. ♂ / ♀. Body. Length: 5.2/5.4, width 1.8/2.1. Head. Length: 0.5/0.5, width: 1.15/1.2, interocular distance 0.4/0.4. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.46/0.53, II: 2.6/2.6, III: 3.5/, IV: 3.1/. Labium. Length of segment I: 0.75/0.75, II: 0.77/0.65, III: 0.63/0.65, IV: 0.57*/0.7. Pronotum. Length 0.8/0.85, width of anterior margin: 1.1/1.15, length of lateral margin: 0.75/0.8, width of posterior margin: 1.9/2.05.</p> <p>Etymology. The specific spinosus is derived from the Latin word “spina meaning thorn and is used to denote the presence of sclerotized appendages in endosoma.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown. Found on fungus covered log.</p> <p>Distribution. French Guyana (Cayenne).</p> <p>Remarks. The abdomen is mutilated in the female, and I was not able to study the female genitalia.</p> <p>Most like P. calyciformis, P. caudatus, P. ecuadorensis, P. parallelus, P. rugosus, P. scutellaris, P. simplex, and P. pallidus in sharing the broad, convex swelling in the middle of scutellum (Figs 4a, b, d, 5b, c, 6). It can be easily distinguished by the endosoma with four distinct sclerites (Fig. 14r).</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♂. French Guiana: Matoury, 73.4 km S. on Hwy N2, 426’8’’S, 5219’57’’W, 55 m, 27 May 1997; J. Ashe, R. Brooks, FG 1AB97 055, ex: fungus log., SM0 095567 (KU); paratype ♀: the same data as holotype except: SM0 095566 (KU).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE53FFB3FF5114B4400EFCD8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE5DFFB2FF5110AE43CAFD9A.text	039587FBAE5DFFB2FF5110AE43CAFD9A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Peltidocylapus tapirapensis Carvalho	<div><p>Peltidocylapus tapirapensis Carvalho</p> <p>Peltidocylapus tapirapensis Carvalho, 1991b: 483, fig. 4 (sp. nov.)</p> <p>Peltidocylapus tapirapensis: Carvalho &amp; Froeschner, 1994: 499 (list); Schuh, 1995: 32 (catalog), 2002–2013 (online catalog); Gorczyca 2006a: 19 (catalog)</p> <p>Remarks. I was not able to study any specimens belonging to this species. Based on the long, erect setae on dorsum, including pronotum (Carvalho 1991), it is likely that it belongs rather to Valdasus as defined by Wolski et al. (2020) than to Peltidocylapus. Further studies, including additional specimens of this species, are required to correctly indicate placement of this species.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Brazil (Mato Grosso).</p> <p>Type material. Holotype ♀: Brazil, Barra do Tapirap, Mato Grosso, XI.1964, Boris Malkin (Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, not examined).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE5DFFB2FF5110AE43CAFD9A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE5DFFB1FF5112F247A6FDE2.text	039587FBAE5DFFB1FF5112F247A6FDE2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapinus Carvalho	<div><p>Cylapinus Carvalho</p> <p>Cylapinus Carvalho, 1986: 592 (new genus). Type species: Cylapinus minusculus Carvalho, 1986 (original designation). Cylapinus: Carvalho &amp; Froeschner 1990: 311 (list); Schuh 1995: 21 (catalog), 2002–2013 (online catalog); Gorczyca 2000: 48, 2006a: 13 (catalog); Wolski 2017: 405, fig. 28 (key to genera)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Easily recognized from other Cylapini by the following characters: dorsum shiny (Figs 3a, b); head shiny (Figs 7a, 8a); vertex with shallow longitudinal sulcus along midline (Figs 8a, 11a); eyes moderately pedunculate (Fig. 8a); clypeal base weakly removed from ventral margin of eyes (Fig. 8a); antennal insertion weakly removed from suture between maxillary and mandibular plates antenna relatively short, shorter than body length (Fig. 8a); pronotum with posterior margin straight or weakly arcuate, covering mesoscutum (Figs 3a, b); metathoracic scent gland evaporative areas narrow, restricted to ventral margin of metepisternum, peritreme moderately raised above evaporative areas (Fig. 11c); scutellum short, ca 0.8 x shorter than pronotum; endosoma simple, with a single sclerite (Figs 3a, b).</p> <p>Redescription. Male. COLORATION (Figs 3a, b, 7a). Thorax. Pronotum. Dark castaneous to black. Hemelytron. Brown to dark brown with yellow areas; corium with developed yellow patch medially; cuneus with developed, yellow, or white patch basally. SURFACE AND VESTITURE (Figs 3a, b 7a, 8a, 11a–d). Dorsum covered with long, erect setae. Head. Head strongly shining, covered with sparse, erect, and semi-recumbent setae; antennal segment I shiny, covered with sparse, thick, erect setae; segment II shiny, covered with sparse erect and semi-recumbent setae on basal half and denser, semi-recumbent setae on apical half; segments III and IV covered with relatively long, semi-recumbent setae. Thorax. Pronotum. Shiny, with deep, large punctures, covered with long erect setae. Thoracic pleura. Shiny, covered with sparse, erect, long setae; proepimeron with broad, deep, and moderately dense punctation; remaining pleura impunctate. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Punctate, covered with long, erect setae. Hemelytron. Covered with semi-recumbent and erect setae; corium and clavus densely punctate. Abdomen. Covered with fine, long, erect, and semi-recumbent setae. STRUCTURE (Figs 3a, b 7a, 8a, 11a–d). Macropterous. Body elongate oval. Head. Eyes moderately pedunculate; vertex with shallow, longitudinal sulcus medially; clypeus short, weakly convex, base weakly removed from ventral margin of eye; antennal insertion weakly removed from suture between maxillary and mandibular plates; antennal segment I short, as long as or weakly longer than interocular distance; antennal segment II cylindrical; antennal segments III and IV filiform. Thorax. Pronotum. Trapeziform; posterior margin straight or weakly arcuate. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Mesoscutum weakly exposed or entirely obscured by posterior part of pronotum; scutellum flattened or weakly convex, small, ca 0.8 x shorter than pronotum. Thoracic pleura. Metathoracic scent gland evaporative areas weakly developed, occupying ventral margin of metepisternum; peritreme moderately raised above evaporative areas, positioned anteriorly on metepisternum. Legs. Tarsus with tarsomere I shorter than length of II and III tarsomeres combined; pretarsal claw with subapical tooth. Abdomen. Genitalia. Aedeagus with theca weakly sclerotized; ductus seminis thin and short; endosoma simple, with indistinct longitudinal, medial sclerotization medially (Figs 12a, d). Left paramere sickle shaped, apical process in lateral view ovoid, narrow apically or broadened basally, strongly narrowed toward apex, sensory lobe well-developed, rounded (Figs 12b, e). Right paramere C-shaped, most often with well-developed sensory lobe (Figs 12c, f).</p> <p>Female. Like male in coloration, structure, texture, and vestiture. For female genitalia see description of C. minusculus.</p> <p>Key to species of Cylapinus</p> <p>1. Corium with broad, yellow transverse patch nearly contiguous with clavus and embolium (Fig. 3a)........................................................................................... Cylapinus minusculus Carvalho, 1986</p> <p>- Medial, yellow patch on corium narrow, not extended to clavus and embolium (Fig. 3b)....... Cylapinus yasunagai sp. nov.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE5DFFB1FF5112F247A6FDE2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE5EFFB0FF51126F4339FC7D.text	039587FBAE5EFFB0FF51126F4339FC7D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapinus minusculus Carvalho 1986	<div><p>Cylapinus minusculus Carvalho, 1986</p> <p>(Figs 3a, 7a, 8a, 10a, 11a–d, 12a–c, 15d–f, 20b, 21b)</p> <p>Cylapinus minusculus Carvalho, 1986: 592, figs 10–13 (new species).</p> <p>Cylapinus minusculus: Carvalho &amp; Froeschner 1990: 319 (list); Schuh 1995: 21 (catalog); Gorczyca 2006a: 13 (catalog)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of features: scutellum from entirely pale to dark castaneous with pale apex (Fig. 3a); corium with medial pale patch broad, bordering embolium and clavus (Fig. 3a); bursa copulatrix broader than wide, anterior margin weakly removed from first gonapophyses (Fig. 15f), sclerotized rings strongly curved, occupying almost entire lateral portion of bursa copulatrix (Fig. 15e, f); vlp without any sclerotization (Fig. 15d).</p> <p>Redescription (composite description based on Carvalho 1986 and 18 additional specimens). Male. COLORATION (Fig. 3a, 7a). Head. Entirely dark castaneous to black, sometimes with pale patch on vertex; antennal segment I yellow, sometimes tinged with red; segment II varying from yellow with dark castaneous or dark brown apical two-thirds to entirely dark castaneous or dark brown; segments III and IV dark castaneous, basal one-fourth of segment III yellow; labium yellow, segment IV largely fuscous. Thorax. Pronotum. Dark castaneous to black. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Varying from entirely pale to dark castaneous with pale apex. Thoracic pleura. Varying from red or dark castaneous with yellow areas to entirely black; metathoracic scent gland evaporative area yellow. Hemelytron. Brown to dark brown with large, yellow areas; clavus brown to dark brown, sometimes with thin, yellow stripe along entire length; corium brown to dark brown with broad, yellow patch medially from clavus to embolium and cuneus varying from uniformly yellow to yellowish brown; membrane pale fuscous. Legs. Coxae yellow, sometimes weakly tinged with red; tibiae and femora yellow broadly tinged with red; tarsi varying from yellow to yellowish brown. Abdomen. Varying from yellow tinged with brown to entirely dark brown. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE. Vestiture as in generic description. Thorax. Thoracic pleura. Ventral surface of mesepimeron, anterior margin of metepisternum, posterior and ventral surface of metepisternum with characteristically perforated surface. STRUCTURE (Figs 3a, 7a, 11a–d). Thorax. Pronotum. Collar narrow, narrower than antennal segment I diameter; calli moderately developed, narrower than eye diameter. Abdomen. Anterior margin of abdominal segment I narrowly covered with perforated surface. Genitalia. Endosoma with well–developed, straight medial sclerite (Fig. 12a); secondary gonopore well differentiated (Fig. 12a); left paramere C-shaped, apical process when viewed laterally weakly curved, almost straight, somewhat widened subapically, narrowly tapering toward apex; paramere body in lateral view thin weakly tapering toward apex; sensory lobe well-developed, rounded (Fig. 12b); right paramere with apical process short, weakly narrowed toward apex when viewed laterally; sensory lobe prominent, rounded (Fig. 12c).</p> <p>Female. Like male in coloration, structure, texture, and vestiture. Genitalia. Bursa copulatrix extending laterally beyond first gonapophysis, crescent-like (Fig. 15f); sclerotized rings paired, narrow, strongly arcuate (Figs 15f, e); spermathecal gland originating from area situated between lateral oviducts (Fig. 15f); ventral labiate plate without any sclerotization its surface weakly squamate (Fig. 15d); vestibulum without any sclerite (Fig. 20b); first valvula with ventral margin more or less arcuate, dorsal margin sinuate, strongly convex subapically (Fig. 21b); second valvula with ventral margin arcuate, dorsal margin weakly sinuate, strongly serrate; posterior wall of bursa copulatrix membranous.</p> <p>Measurements. (♂ / ♀, *: holotype measurements): Body. Length: 2.8*–3.3/3.40–3.45, width 1.20*–1.40/1.40– 1.55. Head. Length: 0.30*–0.35/0.30–0.36, width: 0.70*–0.83/0.85, interocular distance 0.25–0.30*/0.28. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.28–0.50, 0.30*/0.50, II: 0.80*–0.90/0.88–0.90, III (mutilated in holotype): 0.90–0.92/0.95, IV mutilated in holotype): 1.45/1.70. Labium. Length of segment I: 0.33/0.35–0.40, II: 0.38/0.35–0.43, III: 0.35/0.28– 0.30, IV: 0.28/0.28–0.30. Pronotum. Length 0.52–0.60*/0.55–0.60, width of anterior margin:0.60–0.65/0.68–0.70, length of lateral margin: 0.53–0.58/0.58–0.60, width of posterior margin: 1.10*–1.2/1.22.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Brazil (Rondônia), Ecuador (Orellana), Guyana (Cuyuni–Mazaruni).</p> <p>Type material (not examined). Holotype (♂): Brazil, Rondônia, Ji–Paraná, II.1983, equipe J. R. Arias (Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).</p> <p>Additional material examined. 1 ♀: Ecuador, Orellana Prov. [labeled Napo Prov. In error], Tiputini Biodiversity Stn., Tower 1, 0º 37’55” S, 76º08’39 W, 216 m, 4 July 1998, T.L. Erwin et al., collectors; insecticidal fogging of mostly bare green leaves, some with covering of lichenous or bryophytic plants, Lot # 1863, Transect # T–7; 1 ♂: the same data except: 24 October 1994, Lot#1935, Transect #T–74; 3 ♂, 1 ♀: Ecuador, Orellana Prov. [labeled Napo Prov. In error], Res. Ethnica Waorani, 1 km. S, Onkone Gare Camp, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-76.144165&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-0.6319445" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -76.144165/lat -0.6319445)">Trans. Ent.</a>, 4 Feb. 1996, 220m, 00º39’10”S, 76 º26’00”W, T.L. Erwin, et al., insecticidal fogging of mostly bare green leaves, some with covering of lichenous or bryophytic plants in terre firme forest Lot 1407, Trans. T–1; 4 ♂, 1 f #: the same data except: 1 ♂: Lot 1468; 1 f #: 8 Feb. 1996, Lot 1476, Trans. T–8; 1 ♂: 24 October, Transect T–4; 1 ♂: 22 October 1998, Lot#1974, Transect#T–8; 1 ♂: 3 July 1994, 73m mark Proj. MAXUS Lot 777; 1 ♂: 20 Jan 1994, Project MAXUS, Ar–x–trans 7.93m, Lot 619; 1 ♀: Guayana, Mazaruni, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-76.144165&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-0.6319445" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -76.144165/lat -0.6319445)">Potaro District Takutu Mountains</a>, 6º15’ N, 59º5’ W, 14 December 1983; Malaise trap near stream in montane rainforest, EARTHWATCH Research Expedition, W. E. Steiner P. J. &amp; Spangler collectors (USNM).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE5EFFB0FF51126F4339FC7D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE5FFFB7FF5113D446B7FEFC.text	039587FBAE5FFFB7FF5113D446B7FEFC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapinus yasunagai Wolski 2021	<div><p>Cylapinus yasunagai, new species</p> <p>(Figs 3b, 8a, 12d–f)</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of features: scutellum dark castaneous with three yellow patches (Fig. 3b); corium with narrow patch medially, not reaching outer margin of clavus (Fig. 3b); secondary gonopore undifferentiated, medial sclerotization indistinct (Fig. 12d).</p> <p>Description. COLORATION (Fig. 3b, 7a). Dorsum dark castaneous with yellow areas. Head. Dark red brown to entirely black; antennal segment I dark yellow tinged with red; segment II from yellow tinged with dark brown apically to entirely dark brown; segments III and IV dark brown; labium yellow with red and fuscous areas. Thorax. Pronotum. Dark castaneous. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Dark castaneous; scutellum with two patches basolaterally and one apically. Thoracic pleura. Dark castaneous; metathoracic scent gland evaporative area yellow. Hemelytron. Dark castaneous with dark yellow areas; clavus and corium dark castaneous, corium with yellow patches – one basally and other medially; embolium dark yellow; cuneus dark brown, yellow basally; membrane fuscous. Legs. Dark yellow with brown and dark brown areas. Abdomen. Dark castaneous. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE. As in generic description. STRUCTURE (Fig. 3b). Thorax. Pronotum. Collar broad, about as wide antennal segment I diameter; calli broadly developed, about the same size as eye diameter. Genitalia. Endosoma simple, with well-developed, straight, medial sclerite narrowing toward apex, acute apically (Fig. 12d). Left paramere when viewed dorsally ovoid, apex short and narrowed (Fig. 12e). Right paramere apical process short, strongly narrowing toward apex; sensory lobe prominent, rounded (Fig. 12f).</p> <p>Female. Unknown.</p> <p>Measurements. (♂, *: holotype measurements): Body. Length: 3.2–3.8*, width 1.25–1.4*. Head. Length: 0.35*, width: 0.70*–0.83, interocular distance 0.30*–0.33. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.30–0.38*, II: 1.2–1.3*, III: 1.55–1.75*, IV: 1.5–1.8*. Labium. Length of segment I: 0.55*–0.58, II: 0.48–0.50*, III: 0.5–0.56*, IV: 0.33–0.38*. Pronotum. Length 0.55–0.68*, width of anterior margin: 0.58–0.68*, length of lateral margin: 0.55–0.7*, width of posterior margin: 1.15–1.25*.</p> <p>Etymology. I dedicate this species to my friend and colleague Dr. Tomohide Yasunaga, in recognition of his substantial contributions to our knowledge of the Miridae.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Bolivia (Cochabamba), French Guiana (Régina).</p> <p>Type materia l. Holotype (♂): Bolivia: Cochabamba Department: Chaparé Province; <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-65.677&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-17.089167" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -65.677/lat -17.089167)">Highway 4 at Rio Antahuacana bridge</a>, 38 km SW of Villa Tunari, 850 m, 17°05.35’S, 65°40.62’W, 10 Dec 2013, T.J. Henry (USNM); paratype (♂): same data as for holotype (USNM); paratypes: 1 ♂: the same data as for holotype except: 12 Dec 2013; 1 ♂: Guyane française: Kaw, PK 37,5, Malaise 26–XI–2001, Cerda J. leg (MNHN).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE5FFFB7FF5113D446B7FEFC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE58FFB7FF511157432DF9FC.text	039587FBAE58FFB7FF511157432DF9FC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapoides Carvalho	<div><p>Cylapoides Carvalho</p> <p>Cylapoides Carvalho 1952a: 269 (new genus). Type species: Cylapoides bicolor Carvalho, 1952 (original designation). Cylapoides: Carvalho 1955: 21 (key to genera), 1957: 28 (catalog); Schuh 1995: 22 (catalog); Carvalho &amp; Froeschner 1987: 128 (list); Gorczyca 2000: 48 (list), 2006a: 14 (catalog).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of features: dorsum impunctate (Figs 3c, d, 11e); head broad, ca 3.6–5.0 x as wide as long; eyes not pedunculate, covering anterior magin of pronotum (Figs 3c,d, 11e); clypeal base weakly removed from ventral margin of eyes (Fig. 8b); antennal insertion weakly removed from suture between maxillary and mandibular plates (Fig. 8b); antenna relatively short, total length shorter than body length (Fig. 3c, d); pronotum short, ca 5 x as wide as long (Figs 3c, d, 11e); endosoma composed of inflated, sclerotized lobes (Fig. 12g); left paramere apical process with outgrowth basally (Fig. 12h; Carvalho 1952: figs 7, 9); right paramere sickle-shaped (Fig. 12i; Carvalho 1952: figs 7, 8).</p> <p>Redescription. Male. COLORATION (Figs 3c, d). Body dark brown with yellow and silvery areas. SURFACE AND VESTITURE. Dorsum impunctate (Fig. 11e). Head. Covered with long, dense setae; antenna covered with short, semi-recumbent setae; setae on segment III and IV denser than those on segment II. Thorax. Pronotum, mesoscutum, scutellum and hemelytron. Covered with long, irregularly distributed, semi-recumbent setae. Thoracic pleura. Impunctate; covered with sparse, short setae. Abdomen. Covered with dense, reclining setae. STRUCTURE (Figs 3c, d, 8b, 11e). Macropterous, elongate-oval. Head. Broad, ca 3.6 –5.0 x as wide as long; eyes not pedunculate, covering anterior margin of pronotum; vertex strongly carinate posteriorly; clypeal base weakly removed from ventral margin of eye; antennal insertion weakly removed from suture between maxillary and mandibular plates antenna relatively short, shorter than body length antenna long as long as body length; antennal segment I short, ca 0.3–0.4 x as long as interocular distance; antennal segment I and II weakly broadened toward apex, segment I slightly ticker than segment II; segments III and IV thinner than segment II, filiform; labium relatively thick, apex reaching II abdominal segment, its segments not subdivided. Thorax. Pronotum. Collar thin, delimited by shallow depression; calli flattened, separated by shallow depression; lateral margin rounded; pronotum short, ca 5 x as wide as long. Mesoscutum and scutellum. Weakly convex. Thoracic pleura. Scent gland evaporative areas moderately developed; peritreme weakly raised above evaporative areas, oval. Hemelytron. Embolium narrow; cuneus longer than wide. Legs. Short; tarsus with tarsomere I about two times shorter than tarsomere II and III combined; pretarsal claw toothed subapically. Genitalia. Endosoma composed of inflated, sclerotized lobes (Fig. 12g). Left paramere with apical process with outgrowth basally (Fig. 12h; Carvalho 1952: figs 7, 9). Right paramere sickle-shaped (Fig. 12i; Carvalho 1952: figs 7, 8).</p> <p>Female. Like male in coloration, structure, texture, and vestiture. For female genitalia see description of C.unicolor.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE58FFB7FF511157432DF9FC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE58FFB6FF5116574332FDDC.text	039587FBAE58FFB6FF5116574332FDDC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapoides bicolor Carvalho 1952	<div><p>Cylapoides bicolor Carvalho, 1952</p> <p>Cylapoides bicolor Carvalho, 1952a: 270, figs 6–9 (new species).</p> <p>Cylapoides bicolor: Carvalho 1957: 29 (catalog); Carvalho &amp; Froeschner 1987: 154 (list); Schuh 1995: 23 (catalog); Gorczyca 2006a: 14 (catalog).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of characters: head and pronotum contrastingly pale yellow; antennal segment I entirely dark brown; posterior margin of pronotum arcuate (Fig. 3c); parameres as described by Carvalho (1952a: figs 7–9).</p> <p>Redescription. Male. COLORATION. Head pale yellow; antennal segments I– IV dark brown (IV segment mutilated); labium with segment I yellow; segment II red (segments III and IV mutilated in holotype). Thorax. Pronotum. Contrastingly pale yellow. Mesoscutum, scutellum and hemelytron. Dark brown. Thoracic pleura. Proepimeron and proepisternum pale yellow; remaining pleura dark brown. Legs. Dark brown. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE. As in generic description. STRUCTURE. Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior margin weakly convex medially. Genitalia. Parameres as described by Carvalho (1952a: figs 7–9).</p> <p>Measurements. Holotype ♂: Body. Length: 2.8, width 1.4. Head. Length: 0.2, width: 1.0, interocular distance 0.42. Antenna. Length of segment I 0.4, II 0.9, III 0,8, IV (missing). Labium. 1.4. Pronotum. Length 0.4, width of anterior margin 0.7, length of lateral margin 0.3, width of posterior margin 1.0.</p> <p>Female. Unknown.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Belize.</p> <p>Type material. Belize. Holotype: Male, British Honduras, Punta Gorda, Oct. 1935, J. J. White, B. M. 1937–147 (BMNH).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE58FFB6FF5116574332FDDC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
039587FBAE59FFB5FF5112B7411BFE68.text	039587FBAE59FFB5FF5112B7411BFE68.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cylapoides unicolor Carvalho 1952	<div><p>Cylapoides unicolor Carvalho, 1952</p> <p>Cylapoides unicolor Carvalho, 1952a: 271, fig. 10 (new species).</p> <p>Cylapoides unicolor: Carvalho 1957: 29 (catalog); Carvalho &amp; Froeschner 1987: 154 (list); Schuh, 1995: 23 (catalog); Gorczyca 2006a: 14 (catalog).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Recognized by the following set of features: dorsum entirely dark brown (Fig. 3d); antennal segment II varying from yellow with dark brown apex to dark brown with two annulations (Fig. 3d); endosoma composed of more or less developed sclerotized lobes (Fig. 12g); left paramere T-shaped, apical process perpendicular to paramere body, thin weakly tapering toward apex (Fig. 12h); bursa copulatrix rounded; dlp small, restricted to the anterior portion of bursa copulatrix, sclerotized rings ovoid, small (Fig. 15g).</p> <p>Redescription (composite description based on Carvalho 1952a and 16 additional specimens). Female. COLORATION (Fig. 3d). Head. Entirely dark brown; antennal segment I dark brown, pale yellow at basal one third; segment II varying from yellow with dark brown apex to dark brown with two annulations – one, broader medially and other, narrower apically; segments III and IV dark brown; segment III narrowly yellow basally; labium dark brown. Pronotum, mesoscutum and scutellum. Dark brown with silvery tinges. Thoracic pleura. Dark brown. Hemelytron. Varying from dark red to dark brown, basal one third with irregular, silvery stripes; apex of exocorium with small, yellow patch; membrane fuscous, venation yellow. Legs. Dark brown; tibiae with broad yellow annulation near apex. TEXTURE AND VESTITURE. As in generic description. STRUCTURE. Thorax. Pronotum. Posterior margin strongly convex medially (Fig. 11e). Abdomen. Genitalia. Bursa copulatrix rounded; dlp small, restricted to the anterior portion of bursa copulatrix, sclerotized rings ovoid, small; posterior lobe of bursa copulatrix membranous (Fig. 15g).</p> <p>Male. Like female in coloration, structure, texture, and vestiture. Abdomen. Genitalia. Theca weakly sclerotized; ductus seminis moderately thick and long; endosoma composed of developed sclerotized lobes (Fig. 12g); left paramere T-shaped; apical process perpendicular to paramere body, thin weakly tapering toward apex (Fig. 12h).</p> <p>Measurements. (♀ / ♂, *: holotype measurements): Body. Length: 2.9–3.2*/3.4–3.7, width 1.3–1.5*/1.4–1.8. Head. Length: 0.3*/0.3, width: 1.0–1.1*/1.15–1.17, interocular distance 0.5–0.55*/0.52–0.58. Antenna. Length of segment I: 0.3*–0.32/0.3, II: 0.9*–0.92/0.92–0.95, III 1.2*/1.2–1.4, IV 0.7*–1.1/1.4. Labium. (entire labium holotype: 1.7). Length of segment I: 0.38–0.42/0.43–0.47, II: 0.38–0.42/0.42–0.46, III: 0.45–0.48/–0.56, IV: 0.20– 0.24/0.24–0.26 Pronotum. Length 0.38–0.42/–0.48, 0.4*, width of anterior margin: 0.55–0.6/0.72–0.75, length of lateral margin: 0.22/0.23–0.26, width of posterior margin: 1.05–1.1*/1.2–1.25.</p> <p>Biology. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Brazil (Amap), Costa Rica, Ecuador (Orellana), Panama (Panam Oeste), Venezuela (Amazonas).</p> <p>Type material (not examined). Holotype ♀: Oiapoque, Territorio do Amapii, Brasil, J. C. M. Carvalho col. 1949 (Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, not examined).</p> <p>Additional material examined. 1 ♂, 3 ♀: Venezuela, T. F. Amaz., Cerro de la Neblina Basecamp, 140 m, 050′N, 6610′W, 5 February 1985; Pyrethrin fogging of wine tangle; canopy of flood plain forest along Rio Baria, R. Cocroft &amp; W. Steiner; 3 ♂, 2 ♀: Ecuador, Orellana Prov. [labeled Napo Prov. In error], Res. Ethnica Waorani, 1 km. S, Onkone Gare Camp, Trans. Ent., 25 June 1994, 220m, 0039’10”S, 76 26’00”W, T.L. Erwin, et al., insecticidal fogging of mostly bare green leaves, some with covering of lichenous or bryophytic plants in terre firme forest Lot 729; 2 ♂, 1 ♀: Ecuador, Orellana Prov. [labeled Napo Prov. In error], Tiputini Biodiversity Station, 216 m, 0 37’55 S, 7608’39 W, 4 July 1998, T.L. Erwin et al., collectors; insecticidal fogging of mostly bare green leaves, some with covering of lichenous or bryophytic plants, Lot # 1861, Transect # T–7; 1 ♂, 3#: the same data except: 1 ♂: 26 October 1998, Lot 1942, Transect T –5; 1 ♂: Panama RP, Naranjal, I X 1952; FS Blanton Collector; 1 ♀: Costa Rica, Ananas sp.; 17 September 2005, Miami 283847 (USNM).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587FBAE59FFB5FF5112B7411BFE68	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Wolski, Andrzej	Wolski, Andrzej (2021): Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini. Zootaxa 5074 (1): 1-66, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5074.1.1
