taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
038F87AD2B0EFFA52EC55929FB2908B2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5767536/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5767536	Figure 3 Evolutionary relationships of the subfamily Larentiinae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). *Formal taxonomic treatment will be dealt with in P. Sihvonen et al., 2019, unpublished data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-3	Figure 3 Evolutionary relationships of the subfamily Larentiinae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). *Formal taxonomic treatment will be dealt with in P. Sihvonen et al., 2019, unpublished data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-3	2019-08-27	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas		Zenodo	biologists	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas			
038F87AD2B0AFFA22EC55E9BF9C40B6F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5767538/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5767538	Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationships of the subfamilies Archierinae, Desmobathrinae, Epidesmiinae subfam. nov., Oenochrominae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). Taxonomic changes are indicated by a symobolized arrow>. *Formal taxonomic treatment will be dealt with in P. Sihvonen et al., 2019, unpublished data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-4	Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationships of the subfamilies Archierinae, Desmobathrinae, Epidesmiinae subfam. nov., Oenochrominae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). Taxonomic changes are indicated by a symobolized arrow>. *Formal taxonomic treatment will be dealt with in P. Sihvonen et al., 2019, unpublished data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-4	2019-08-27	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas		Zenodo	biologists	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas			
038F87AD2B07FFAB2EC55947FB400E30.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5767542/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5767542	Figure 6 Evolutionary relationships of the subfamily Ennominae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). Taxonomic changes are indicated by a symobolized arrow>. *Formal taxonomic treatment will be dealt with in G. Brehm et al., 2019, unpublished data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-6	Figure 6 Evolutionary relationships of the subfamily Ennominae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). Taxonomic changes are indicated by a symobolized arrow>. *Formal taxonomic treatment will be dealt with in G. Brehm et al., 2019, unpublished data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-6	2019-08-27	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas		Zenodo	biologists	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas			
038F87AD2B0DFFA42EC55ACFFA4F0CF7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5767538/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5767538	Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationships of the subfamilies Archierinae, Desmobathrinae, Epidesmiinae subfam. nov., Oenochrominae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). Taxonomic changes are indicated by a symobolized arrow>. *Formal taxonomic treatment will be dealt with in P. Sihvonen et al., 2019, unpublished data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-4	Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationships of the subfamilies Archierinae, Desmobathrinae, Epidesmiinae subfam. nov., Oenochrominae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). Taxonomic changes are indicated by a symobolized arrow>. *Formal taxonomic treatment will be dealt with in P. Sihvonen et al., 2019, unpublished data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-4	2019-08-27	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas		Zenodo	biologists	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas			
038F87AD2B0CFFA32EC55D3BFB460C2E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5767538/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5767538	Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationships of the subfamilies Archierinae, Desmobathrinae, Epidesmiinae subfam. nov., Oenochrominae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). Taxonomic changes are indicated by a symobolized arrow>. *Formal taxonomic treatment will be dealt with in P. Sihvonen et al., 2019, unpublished data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-4	Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationships of the subfamilies Archierinae, Desmobathrinae, Epidesmiinae subfam. nov., Oenochrominae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). Taxonomic changes are indicated by a symobolized arrow>. *Formal taxonomic treatment will be dealt with in P. Sihvonen et al., 2019, unpublished data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-4	2019-08-27	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas		Zenodo	biologists	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas			
038F87AD2B0CFFA32EC55D3BFB460C2E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5767540/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5767540	Figure 5 Evolutionary relationships of the subfamily Geometrinae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). Taxonomic changes are indicated by a symobolized arrow>. § New subfamily. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-5	Figure 5 Evolutionary relationships of the subfamily Geometrinae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). Taxonomic changes are indicated by a symobolized arrow>. § New subfamily. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-5	2019-08-27	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas		Zenodo	biologists	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas			
038F87AD2B0EFFA62EC55E53FCAA0B14.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5767534/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5767534	Figure 2 Evolutionary relationships of the subfamily Sterrhinae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). *Formal taxonomic treatment will be dealt with in P. Sihvonen et al., 2019, unpublished data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-2	Figure 2 Evolutionary relationships of the subfamily Sterrhinae. Numbers above branches are SH-aLRT support (%)/ultrafast bootstrap support, UFBoot2(%), for nodes to the right of the numbers. Values of SH ≥ 80 and UFBoot2 ≥ 95 indicate well-supported clades (Trifinopoulos & Minh, 2018). *Formal taxonomic treatment will be dealt with in P. Sihvonen et al., 2019, unpublished data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7386/fig-2	2019-08-27	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas		Zenodo	biologists	Murillo-Ramos, Leidys;Brehm, Gunnar;Sihvonen, Pasi;Hausmann, Axel;Holm, Sille;Ghanavi, Hamid Reza;Õunap, Erki;Truuverk, Andro;Staude, Hermann;Friedrich, Egbert;Tammaru, Toomas;Wahlberg, Niklas			
