identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
922FD119F93D561C898E8F20FE3A603D.text	922FD119F93D561C898E8F20FE3A603D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ptychoptera (Paraptychoptera) castor Keresztes & Kappert 2021	<div><p>Ptychoptera (Paraptychoptera) castor Keresztes &amp; Kappert sp. nov.</p><p>Figure 2</p><p>Type material.</p><p>Holotype. male, Albania: Tragjas municipality, Rrepet e Izvorit, Vlora district, sweeping the vegetation near a limnocren karst spring with large basin and muddy shore with reeds, 30.iv, 2019, 17 m, leg. M. Henning, 40.323132°N, 19.510031°E. Institutional id for specimen is DCFBG-PT-0002.</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>.  Ptychoptera (Paraptychoptera) castor sp. nov. is known only from a single male collected near a limnocrene karst spring with muddy shore invaded by rich vegetation at Repet y Izvorit, Tragjas, Albania (Fig. 3). Male general habitus, wing venation and spots are highly similar to  P. helena (Fig. 4a, b, c). However, the male epandrium has a unique design, differentiated from all other members of  Paraptychoptera, but close to  P. helena (Fig. 4d, e). In contrast to  P. helena, the finger-like subapical process on its ventral side is well developed, with a basal chitinous process, equal in length with subapical lobe, which is much shorter in  P. helena (Fig. 2d) and the conspicuous long harpoon-shaped apex of the hypoproct (Fig. 2c) which is bilobate in  P. helena (Fig. 4d). Gonostylus apical stylus is long, twice as long as the secondary lobe (Fig. 2e), which differentiates it well from  P. helena, where such a process is subequal. Gonostylus anterior lobule with a short finger-like vental process (Fig. 2f), while in  P. helena such a process is much longer and curved at tip (Fig. 4g). Hypandrium apex lacking a narrow-lobe-like terminal division (Fig. 2g) which is present in  P. helena (Fig. 4h), and well developed in all other  Paraptychoptera species, in addition with a series of fine differences in male aedeagal complex and paramere (Fig. 2h, i).</p><p>Description</p><p>. Medium-sized species, body length 7.3 mm, wing length 8 mm. Head and thorax shiny black, almost glabrous, pleuron almost uniformly brownish, some obvious pale setae only above halter. Head shiny brownish, labrum pale brownish to yellow. Antennae with 15 segments. Scape elongate cylinder, pedicel globular, yellowish, as the half of the first flagellar segment. Remainder flagellomeres blackish brown (Fig. 2a). First flagellar segment shorter than the following two segments together, the others successively shorter and thinner. Each flagellar segment with several long straight black setae and dense pelt of short dark hairs. Eye large, finely faceted, bare; no ocelli. Large, oval, clypeus, convex, terminal labrum yellowish. Large labellum, very long maxillary palpus with whip-like fifth segment pale yellow.</p><p>Thorax dorsally black with metallic blue shining, narrow pronotum, base of postnotum and large parts of episternum, epimeron, and metapleuron pale brownish. Coxae and legs yellowish, apex of femur, narrow base and apex of tibia, tarsal segments brownish. Wing with three transverse bands of well-developed confluent dark spots close to anterior margin on basal, middle and distal part of otherwise clear or pale yellowish membrane. Additionally, isolated dark spots are present on both sides of the middle dark band at the level of Sc and at the distal end of R3 (Fig. 2b). Wing membrane with macrotrichia. Prehalter and halter pale yellow.</p><p>First abdominal tergite blackish to dark brown with metallic shining, only a narrow yellow stripe near the distal, tergite 2 large part yellowish with brown spot in the middle, distal part shiny black, tergite 3 brownish, tergite 4 and all distal tergites brownish black. Genitalia pale brown. Narrow sternites pale brown at base, becoming yellowish towards the auxiliary sexual organ on segment III. Sternites 4-7 medially reduced to a narrow band with a deep notch in the middle at proximal margins.</p><p>Auxiliary sexual organ less developed than in the other members of  Paraptychoptera, excepting  P. lacustris and  P. helena . Sternite 3 with thin long golden hair fringes on sides; its bare middle part lacking the transversally sculptured median sclerite, but distal brownish patch is present at distal end, close to the deep pouch of the auxiliary sexual organ. Distally sternite 3 with deep pouch of the auxiliary sexual organ. Two caudal lips of the pouch less developed, one smooth lateral lobe on each side, covered with dense hair fringe in their interior part. Lateral lips separated by a deep furrow leading to a small oval sclerite inside the pouch and two lateral lobes covered with fine sculptures.</p><p>Male terminalia. Epandrium with distinct collar, deeply and widely emarginated behind, hypoproct long lobe-like and densely hairy (Fig. 2c). Hypoproct lobe harpoon shaped, tapering at apex. Epandrium lobes long, slightly widened apically. Subapical process of epandrium with a finger-like ventral projection with basal thorn equal in length with the digitiform process (Fig. 2d). Apex of subapical lobe with long macrotrichia (Fig. 2d). Gonocoxite simple, with its medial appendage as a simple curved pilose lobe. Gonostylus apical lobe short, finger-like, fringe of setae at apex, secondary lobe similar shape, but twice as long as the apical lobe (Fig. 2e). Gonostylus anterior lobules divided into a dorsal triangular process and a ventral part with a short finger-like rostrum. Middle lobe strong sclerotised sickle-like rounded at apex, long fine hairs at tip (Fig. 2f). Hypandrium wide, hemispherical, long, elongate crests in the middle, including a narrow slit between them, from which the eversible sac protrudes. The transverse scale at the base of the slit is less developed, tongue-like, rounded apically, membranous and densely pilose. Hypandrium apex terminal division process missing (Fig. 2g). Aedeagal complex highly similar to other  Paraptychoptera species. Paramere lateral arms well developed, widened towards a sloping apex. Well-developed setae close to the apex of the paramere arms. Apical processes of paramere well developed, rounded, with a recurring thorn-like formation (Fig. 2h). Apex of aedeagus blunt, depressed medially, subapical lobe of aedeagus pointed (Fig. 2i).</p><p>Female unknown.</p><p>Etymology</p><p>. The specific epithet is named after Castor, a god from Greek mythology, the twin brother of Helena, because of its close morphological similarity with  P. helena .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/922FD119F93D561C898E8F20FE3A603D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Keresztes, Lujza;Kappert, Juergen;Henning, Maria;Toeroek, Edina	Keresztes, Lujza, Kappert, Juergen, Henning, Maria, Toeroek, Edina (2021): Helen's twins in the Balkans: discovery of two new Paraptychoptera Tonnoir, 1919 species closely related to P. helena Peus, 1958, with systematic revision of the " lacustris " group (Diptera, Ptychopteridae). ZooKeys 1071: 63-81, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1071.58598, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1071.58598
645AD891E989599FADBE40F2164C712B.text	645AD891E989599FADBE40F2164C712B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ptychoptera (Paraptychoptera) pollux Keresztes & Toeroek 2021	<div><p>Ptychoptera (Paraptychoptera) pollux Keresztes &amp; 
Toeroek sp. nov.</p><p>Figure 5</p><p>Type material.</p><p>Holotype. male, North Macedonia: Mavrovo, Novo Selo, sweeping the vegetation near a small outflow from Mavrovo Lake, 29. vi, 2017, 990 m, leg. E.  Török, 41.721355°N, 20.830103°E. Institutional id for specimen is DCFBG-PT-0003.</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>.  Paraptychoptera pollux sp. nov. is known only from a single male collected near a small overflow of the Mavrovo Lake with muddy shore invaded by rich vegetation (Fig. 6). The male general habitus and wing venation with spots are highly similar to  P. helena and  P. castor sp. nov., but the wing spots tend to be reduced, mostly the basal spot and distally band which is divided into two distinct patches. Further differences are in male epandrium: The less developed finger-like subapical process is unique to  P. helena,  P. castor sp. nov., and  P. pollux sp. nov. (Figs 2d, 4e, 5d). However, in  P. pollux sp. nov., this process is much shorter than in  P. castor, but comparably longer than in  P. helena, with blunt apex and divergent from the basal thorn. However, there is an important difference in the basal thorn orientation. In  P. pollux, the basal thorn is oriented upward, while in  P. helena the thorn is curved downward. Hypopygium shape with its rounded and slightly inflated apex is the second most distinctive character of  P. pollux sp. nov., which differentiates it from both  P. castor and  P. helena, as well as from other  Paraptychoptera species (Figs 2c, 4d, 5c). Paramere lateral arms of  P. pollux are similar to  P. castor sp. nov. and  P. helena, but are shorter and gradually widened at tip and rounded (Fig. 5h). The rest of the characters, such the gonocoxite and gonostylus complex, hypandrium and the aedeagus are highly similar to  P. helena (Fig. 4g, i).</p><p>Description</p><p>. Medium-sized species, highly similar to its sibling species,  P. castor sp. nov. and  P. helena . Body length 7.9 mm, wing length 8.5 mm. Head and thorax similar to  P. castor . Antennae with 15 segments. Scape elongate, cylindrical, yellowish brown, pedicel globular, pale brown, flagellar segments uniformly dark brown (Fig. 5a). First flagellar segment shorter than the following two segments together, the others successively shorter and thinner. Each flagellar segment with several long straight black setae and a dense pelt of short dark hairs. Head shining black. Eye large, finely faceted, bare; no ocelli. Clypeus large, elongate, rectangular, flattened, labrum pale brownish. Labellum large, yellowish, maxillary palpus very long with a whip-like fifth segment pale yellow.</p><p>Thorax dorsally brownish black with metallic blue shining, narrow pronotum, base of postnotum and large parts of episternum, epimeron and metapleuron pale brownish. Coxae orange, legs yellowish, apex of femur, narrow base and apex of tibia, tarsal segments brownish. Wing with three transverse bands of well-developed confluent dark spots in the anterior part of base, middle and distal part of otherwise clear or pale yellowish membrane. Basal spot of the wing more reduced. Distal band interrupted close to ventral edge. Isolated dark spots are present at distal end of Sc and R3 (Fig. 5b). Wing membrane with macrotrichia. Halter and prehalter yellow.</p><p>First abdominal tergite blackish to dark brown with a metallic blue shining, narrow yellow stripe close to distal end, well developed yellow band in tergite 2 with a black spot in the middle. Tergite 3 black, covered with yellow setae, the remaining tergites brownish black. Genitalia pale brown. Narrow sternites pale brown at base, becoming yellowish towards the auxiliary sexual organ on segment III. Sternites 4-7 medially reduced to a narrow band with a deep notch in the middle at proximal margins.</p><p>Auxiliary sexual organ highly similar to  P. castor sp. nov. and  P. helena . Male terminalia. Epandrium with distinct collar, deeply and widely emarginated behind, hypoproct long tongue-like and furry (Fig. 5c). Hypoproct lobe widened at apex, rounded, with a shallow notch in the middle. Epandrium lobe long, slightly widened apically. Subapical process of epandrium with a digitiform ventral projection with basal thorn and curved upward, longer, than the blunt digitiform process (Fig. 5c, d). Apex of the digitiform process with long macrotrichia. Gonocoxite simple, cylindrical. Gonostylus with an anterior lobule divided into a dorsal triangular process, ventral part with a small rostrum (Fig. 5f). Middle lobe strong sclerotised sickle-like curved process, with long fine hairs at the end (Fig. 5e, f). Gonostylus apical lobe narrow fleshly process, subequal with secondary lobe (Fig. 5e). Secondary lobe slightly curved at apex, with strong erect spines. Hypandrium wide, long and elongate crests in the middle, including a narrow slit between them, from which the eversible sac protrudes. The transverse scale at the base of the slit is less developed, with two lateral wings and a triangular process in the middle, membranous and densely pilose. Hypandrium apex terminal division less developed, but distinct as a narrow band with pointed apex (Fig. 5g). Paramere lateral arms less developed, rounded apically and widened with less-developed setae close to the interior of the apex. Apical processes of paramere well developed, rectangular, with a recurring thorn-like formation (Fig. 5h). Aedeagal complex highly similar to other  Paraptychoptera species. Apex of aedeagus concave, with a depression in the middle, subapical lobe of aedeagus rounded (Fig. 5i).</p><p>Female unknown.</p><p>Etymology</p><p>. The specific epithet is named after Pollux, the twin brother of Castor in Greek mythology, known together as the Dioscuri, both twin brothers of Helena, because together with  P. castor they share close morphological similarity with  P. helena and all together they form a distinct monophyletic unit among  Paraptychoptera, as was recovered by our cladistic analysis (Fig. 7).</p><p>Cladistic analyses</p><p>.The parsimony analyses of the 53 different morphological characters selected in the present study resulted in a single most parsimonious tree (Fig. 7).</p><p>As shown in our parsimony analyses (Fig. 7.), the eleven different  Paraptychoptera species are divided into two major monophyletic clades, with a highly divergent monophyletic unit, including five species,  P. agnes,  P. lacustris,  P. helena,  P. castor sp. nov., and  P. pollux sp. nov. This monophyletic unit is supported by common morphological features, such as the soft and lobe-like basal scale, hypandrium with a long, but not bilobate narrow ribbon-like process or reduced and the simpler lateral arms of paramere (characters 36, 52).</p><p>Among this group, a distinct lineage is represented by  P. agnes, highly different from all other members of the clade by the presence of a conspicuous epandrial lobe, with a ventral lobe close to the base, and a transverse projection with a comb of long setae, unique only to this species, in addition to the particularly shaped hypoproct and epandrial subapical process, and also by the uniquely shaped secondary lobe of the apical stylus inflated and globulose at apex, besides the details of hypandrium and parameres (characters 8, 12, 13, 23, 30, 37, 47).</p><p>The present cladistic analyses recovered the "  Ptychoptera lacustris " species group as a monophyletic unit, which was also noted by Stubbs (1993) and Zwick and  Starý (2003), but in a restricted sense, containing only four species:  P. lacustris,  P. helena,  P. castor sp. nov. and  P. pollux sp. nov. Further, the previously considered  P. loncicauda and  P. paludosa were excluded and mostly based on a weekly developed auxiliary sexual organ in "  Ptychoptera lacustris " group, but well developed in later species, and a weakly developed and reduced subhemispherical membranous basal scale in "  Ptychoptera lacustris " group in contrast with the well-developed and chitinous scale in  P. longicauda and  P. lacustris . There was also the presence of the stripe-like and bifurcate or cross-shaped terminal division of the hypandrium apex in  P. longicauda and  P. paludosa, in contrast with the weakly developed terminal division of hypandrium apex in "  Ptychoptera lacustris " group. This latter was missing in  P. lacustris or reduced to a tapering ribbon-like protrusion in  P. helena and allies (characters 38, 48). However, within the "  Ptychoptera lacustris " group the subapical lobes of epandrium have a conspicuously similar shape in  P. castor sp. nov.,  P. helena and  P. pollux sp. nov., while in  P. lacustris such a formation is totally absent.  Ptychoptera lacustris is also divergent from the three closely-related Balkan species by the presence of a small triangular hypoproct and rounded subspherical basal scale of the hypandrium (characters 21, 39).  Ptychoptera helena and the two newly discovered species of the "  Ptychoptera lacustris " group are morphologically highly similar, but deeply divergent from all other  Paraptychoptera species, having unique epandrial clasper lobes that are slightly divergent toward the tip, and epandrial subapical lobes reduced to a finger-like short projection with a basal chitinous thorn, hypandrium apex terminal division that is highly reduced, finger-like, with pointed apex, lacking laterally directed spines, but thin hairs are sometimes present (only in  P. castor such a process is absent). Further, the aedeagus tip has a unique shape, with a small depression in the middle (characters 29, 40, 44, 45).  Ptychoptera helena and  P. pollux sp. nov. are highly similar, but minor differences are present in the shape of the hypopygium, and the design of the subapical lobe of the epandrium (characters 24, 26). Further, they are distinctly different from  P. castor sp. nov. by the presence of a long subapical epandrial lobe (character 19), which is as long as its basal chitinous thorn, as well as the long harpoon-like hypoproct, unique only to this species (character 25).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/645AD891E989599FADBE40F2164C712B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Keresztes, Lujza;Kappert, Juergen;Henning, Maria;Toeroek, Edina	Keresztes, Lujza, Kappert, Juergen, Henning, Maria, Toeroek, Edina (2021): Helen's twins in the Balkans: discovery of two new Paraptychoptera Tonnoir, 1919 species closely related to P. helena Peus, 1958, with systematic revision of the " lacustris " group (Diptera, Ptychopteridae). ZooKeys 1071: 63-81, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1071.58598, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1071.58598
