taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03858791FFC7FF94DF0B922EFD90F844.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5708657/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5708657	Fig. 1. – Comparison plate: ‘Cheirostylis chinensis var. glabra Bhaumik & M. K. Pathak’. A. Labellum; B. Petal; C. Column with anther-cap – Cheirostylis moniliformis (Griff.) Seidenf.; D-E. Labellum; F. Petal; G. Column – ‘Cheirostylis seidenfadeniana C. S. Kumar & F. N. Rasm.’; H. Labellum – Cheirostylis parvifolia Lindl.; I-J. Labellum. [A-C: after BHAUMIK & PATHAK, 2006; D, F-G: A. Bhattacharjee 34819 A, CL; E: A. Bhattacharjee 34819 B, CAL; H: after SATHISH KUMR & RASMUSSEN,1987; I: Sathish Kumar s.n., TBGT, spirit; J: A. Bhattacharjee 38142 A, CAL]	Fig. 1. – Comparison plate: ‘Cheirostylis chinensis var. glabra Bhaumik & M. K. Pathak’. A. Labellum; B. Petal; C. Column with anther-cap – Cheirostylis moniliformis (Griff.) Seidenf.; D-E. Labellum; F. Petal; G. Column – ‘Cheirostylis seidenfadeniana C. S. Kumar & F. N. Rasm.’; H. Labellum – Cheirostylis parvifolia Lindl.; I-J. Labellum. [A-C: after BHAUMIK & PATHAK, 2006; D, F-G: A. Bhattacharjee 34819 A, CL; E: A. Bhattacharjee 34819 B, CAL; H: after SATHISH KUMR & RASMUSSEN,1987; I: Sathish Kumar s.n., TBGT, spirit; J: A. Bhattacharjee 38142 A, CAL]	2012-07-01	Bhattacharjee, Avishek		Zenodo	biologists	Bhattacharjee, Avishek			
03858791FFC7FF94DC509770FBB2F845.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5708657/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5708657	Fig. 1. – Comparison plate: ‘Cheirostylis chinensis var. glabra Bhaumik & M. K. Pathak’. A. Labellum; B. Petal; C. Column with anther-cap – Cheirostylis moniliformis (Griff.) Seidenf.; D-E. Labellum; F. Petal; G. Column – ‘Cheirostylis seidenfadeniana C. S. Kumar & F. N. Rasm.’; H. Labellum – Cheirostylis parvifolia Lindl.; I-J. Labellum. [A-C: after BHAUMIK & PATHAK, 2006; D, F-G: A. Bhattacharjee 34819 A, CL; E: A. Bhattacharjee 34819 B, CAL; H: after SATHISH KUMR & RASMUSSEN,1987; I: Sathish Kumar s.n., TBGT, spirit; J: A. Bhattacharjee 38142 A, CAL]	Fig. 1. – Comparison plate: ‘Cheirostylis chinensis var. glabra Bhaumik & M. K. Pathak’. A. Labellum; B. Petal; C. Column with anther-cap – Cheirostylis moniliformis (Griff.) Seidenf.; D-E. Labellum; F. Petal; G. Column – ‘Cheirostylis seidenfadeniana C. S. Kumar & F. N. Rasm.’; H. Labellum – Cheirostylis parvifolia Lindl.; I-J. Labellum. [A-C: after BHAUMIK & PATHAK, 2006; D, F-G: A. Bhattacharjee 34819 A, CL; E: A. Bhattacharjee 34819 B, CAL; H: after SATHISH KUMR & RASMUSSEN,1987; I: Sathish Kumar s.n., TBGT, spirit; J: A. Bhattacharjee 38142 A, CAL]	2012-07-01	Bhattacharjee, Avishek		Zenodo	biologists	Bhattacharjee, Avishek			
03858791FFC5FF96DF0A9770FDDCFA03.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5708661/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5708661	Fig. 2. – ‘Cheirostylis munnacampensis A. N. Rao’. A. Flower; B. Petal; C. Labellum; D. Column with anther-cap – Cheirostylis yunnanensis Rolfe; E. Flower; F-G. Petal; H. Labellum (partly fragmented); I. Portion of hypochile with appendages (magnified); J. Column. [A-D: after RO, 1988; E-J: T. K. Paul 43698, CAL, dissected from dry and pressed specimen]	Fig. 2. – ‘Cheirostylis munnacampensis A. N. Rao’. A. Flower; B. Petal; C. Labellum; D. Column with anther-cap – Cheirostylis yunnanensis Rolfe; E. Flower; F-G. Petal; H. Labellum (partly fragmented); I. Portion of hypochile with appendages (magnified); J. Column. [A-D: after RO, 1988; E-J: T. K. Paul 43698, CAL, dissected from dry and pressed specimen]	2012-07-01	Bhattacharjee, Avishek		Zenodo	biologists	Bhattacharjee, Avishek			
