identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
861004662B094E395EF9B8748383FEC0.text	861004662B094E395EF9B8748383FEC0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Dineticola Gómez & Corgosinho & Rivera-Sánchez 2021	<div><p>The case of Dineticola gen. nov.</p> <p>The name Dineticola gen. nov. appears in Table 4 (pages 10 and 11) and on Fig. 19 (page 40) in Gómez et al. (2021). Dineticola gen. nov. was a slip of the pen and, therefore, it is a nomen nudum; it is unavailable because it was not accompanied by a description or a bibliographic reference, failing to conform to art. 13 (ICZN 1999). The genus name Dineticola gen. nov. should be changed to Dinetocaris gen. nov.</p> <p>List of errors</p> <p>Page 1, Abstract, line 14:</p> <p>“and Dinetia gen. nov. ” should be changed to “and Dinetocaris gen. nov. ”</p> <p>Page 2, Introduction, line 30:</p> <p>“we propose Dinetia gen. nov. ” should be changed to “we propose Dinetocaris gen. nov. ”</p> <p>Page 10, Table 4, terminals:</p> <p>“ Dineticola gen. nov. ” should be changed to “ Dinetocaris gen. nov. ”</p> <p>Page 11, Table 4, terminals:</p> <p>“ Dineticola gen. nov. ” should be changed to “ Dinetocaris gen. nov. ”</p> <p>Page 43, line 31:</p> <p>“ Dinetia gen. nov. ” should be changed to “ Dinetocaris gen. nov. ”</p> <p>Page 43, line 35:</p> <p>“(= Dinetia minuta (Dinet, 1971) ” should be changed to “(= Dinetocaris minuta (Dinet, 1971) ”</p> <p>Page 44, line 23:</p> <p>“Apomorphies for Dinetia gen. nov. ” should be changed to “Apomorphies for Dinetocaris gen. nov. ”</p> <p>Page 44, lines 25, 30 and 37:</p> <p>“ Dinetia gen. nov. ” should be changed to “ Dinetocaris gen. nov. ”</p> <p>Page 45, lines 12 and 17:</p> <p>“ Dinetia gen. nov. ” should be changed to “ Dinetocaris gen. nov. ”</p> <p>Page 53, line 18:</p> <p>“Phylogenetic position of Dinetia gen. nov.,…” should be changed to “Phylogenetic position of Dinetocaris gen. nov.,…”</p> <p>Page 53, lines 32–33:</p> <p>“…a clade composed of Dinetia gen. nov.,…” should be changed to “…a clade composed of Dinetocaris gen. nov.,…”</p> <p>Page 55, lines 18, 19, 21, 25 and 29:</p> <p>“ Dinetia gen. nov. ” should be changed to “ Dinetocaris gen. nov. ”</p> <p>Page 55, line 27:</p> <p>“…the Dinetia – Rhyncholagena clade…” should be changed to “…the Dinetocaris – Rhyncholagena clade…”</p> <p>Page 56, line 18:</p> <p>“ Dinetia gen. nov. ” should be changed to “ Dinetocaris gen. nov. ” Page 40, Fig. 19 is in very low resolution. A new figure, with Dineticola corrected to Dinetocaris gen. nov., is provided here:</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/861004662B094E395EF9B8748383FEC0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Gómez, Samuel;Corgosinho, Paulo Henrique Costa;Rivera-Sánchez, Karen I.	Gómez, Samuel, Corgosinho, Paulo Henrique Costa, Rivera-Sánchez, Karen I. (2021): Proposal of new genera and species of the subfamily Diosaccinae (Copepoda: Harpacticoida: Miraciidae) - Corrigendum. European Journal of Taxonomy 778: 86-89, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.778.1569
