identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
D57D87F857412E7FFF5BFBCFA49BF8C6.text	D57D87F857412E7FFF5BFBCFA49BF8C6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Guadana Rheims 2010	<div><p>Genus Guadana Rheims, 2010a</p> <p>Figs 1−57</p> <p>Guadana Rheims, 2010a: 33 (Type species Guadana manauara Rheims by original designation).</p> <p>Emended diagnosis. Species of Guadana Rheims resemble those of Sparianthina Banks in having intermarginal denticles arranged in a row; two pairs of ventral spines on tibiae I−II and one lateral spine on each side of metatarsi I−II (see Jäger et al. 2009: figs 10, 33; Rheims 2010a: fig. 7); and male palps with a strong dorsal tegular apophysis (DTA) (Figs 57−66, 94−102); female palp with a long-toothed claw (Jäger et al. 2009: figs 13, 64). They are distinguished from those of the latter genus by the male palps with DTA acutely tapering (Figs 57−66); embolus with basal projection absent or at the prolateral side of the embolus (Figs 67−76) (DTA roundly blunt or distally widened, basal projection at the retrolateral or ventral side of the embolus in Sparianthina) and by the female vulva with glandular projection absent and fertilization ducts short (e.g., Figs 5, 30, 47) (glandular projection present and fertilization ducts long in Sparianthina).</p> <p>Description. See Rheims (2010a).</p> <p>Distribution. North and northwestern South America, with records from French Guiana, Brazil, Ecuador and Peru (Figs 81−82).</p> <p>Composition. Twelve species: Guadana alpahuayo sp. n.; G. amendoin sp. n.; G. arawak sp. n.; G. manauara; G. mapia sp. n.; G. muirapinima sp. n.; G. neblina; G. panguana; G. quillu; G. tambopata; G. ucayali sp. n.; G. urucu.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F857412E7FFF5BFBCFA49BF8C6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
D57D87F857412E7CFF5BF8D9A1E7F9CF.text	D57D87F857412E7CFF5BF8D9A1E7F9CF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Guadana Rheims 2010	<div><p>Identification key for all known species of Guadana</p> <p>1 Males.............................................................................................. 2</p> <p>- Females........................................................................................... 11</p> <p>2(1) Embolus gently curved retrolaterally, without basal projection (Figs 74−76)....................................... 3</p> <p>- Embolus strongly curved prolaterally, with basal projection (Figs 67−73)......................................... 5</p> <p>3(2) DTA with ridged margin and no keels (Figs 62−63).......................................................... 4</p> <p>- DTA with smooth margins and long ventral keel (Fig. 64, Rheims 2010a: fig. 29)........................ G. tambopata</p> <p>4(3) Ridged margin long, with several ridges (more than 10) distributed throughout more than half DTA length (Fig. 63, Rheims 2010a: fig. 24); dRTA distally bifid (Rheims 2010a: fig. 25)............................................. G. quillu</p> <p>- Ridged margin short, with few ridges (4 or 5) distributed along less than ¼ DTA length (Fig. 62, Rheims 2010a: fig. 22); dRTA distally trifid (best seen in retrolateral view) (Rheims 2010a: fig. 23).................................. G. panguana</p> <p>5(2) Conductor distally widened (Fig. 32, Rheims 2010a: fig. 34)................................................... 6</p> <p>- Conductor with the same width throughout its entire length (Figs 2, 18, 44)....................................... 7</p> <p>6(5) dRTA bearing two small, thorn-like projections at tip (Figs 32, 41); embolus with basal projection membranous at center (Figs 32, 41, 72).............................................................................. G. ucayali sp. n.</p> <p>- dRTA bearing single hook-like projection at tip (Rheims 2010a: fig. 34); embolus with basal projection sclerotized (Fig. 76, Rheims 2010a: fig. 34).......................................................................... G. urucu</p> <p>7(5) Embolus with basal projection single (Figs 67−69, 71−73).................................................... 8</p> <p>- Embolus with basal projection bifid with one branch blunt, with long prolateral fold and another distally widened, with pointed tip (Figs 44, 53, 70).................................................................. G. muirapinima sp. n.</p> <p>8(7) Embolus tip with sub-distal keel (Figs 67−68)............................................................... 9</p> <p>- Embolus tip with subdistal projection (Figs 69, 71).......................................................... 10</p> <p>9(8) vRTA and dRTA similar sized in retrolateral view (Figs 19, 28); embolus with basal projection with jagged margin (Figs 18, 27, 68).................................................................................... G. arawak sp. n.</p> <p>- vRTA smaller than dRTA in retrolateral view (Fig. 2−3); embolus with basal projection with smooth margin (Figs 2, 11, 67)..................................................................................... G. alpahuayo sp. n.</p> <p>10(8) dRTA slender, hook-shaped and vRTA triangular (in ventral view) (Rheims 2010a: fig. 20); embolus with basal projection wider than long (Fig. 71, Rheims 2010a: fig. 20).......................................................... G. neblina</p> <p>- dRTA wide, medially bent at roughly 90° and vRTA (in retrolateral view) squared (in ventral view) (Rheims 2010a: figs 13−14); embolus with basal projection longer than wide (Fig. 69, Rheims 2010a: fig. 13)......................... G. manauara</p> <p>11(1) MS without epigynal pockets (Rheims 2010a: figs 26, 31).................................................... 12</p> <p>- MS bearing medial or anterior epigynal pockets (Figs 4, 15, 29, Rheims 2010a: 17)................................ 13</p> <p>12(11) Epigynal ledges running posteriorly to half the epigyne length, then curving laterally; MS with median U-shaped flaps (Rheims 2010a: fig. 31); internal ducts strongly convoluted close to FD (Rheims 2010a: fig. 32)................... G. tambopata</p> <p>- Epigynal ledges running posteriorly and curving anteriorly close to posterior margin; MS smooth (Rheims 2010a: fig. 26); internal ducts slightly widened close to FD (Rheims 2010a: fig. 29)....................................... G. quillu</p> <p>13(11) MS with paired epigynal pockets (Figs 4, 15, Rheims 2010a: fig. 17)........................................... 14</p> <p>- MS with single epigynal pocket (Figs 29, 46, Rheims 2010a: fig. 36)........................................... 16</p> <p>14(13) MS with epigynal pockets connected medially, opening anteriorly (Fig. 4; Rheims 2010a: fig. 17); internal ducts running medially from CO, then posteriorly to SP (Fig. 5; Rheims 2010a: fig. 19)........................................... 15</p> <p>- MS with epigynal pockets not connected medially, opening posteriorly (Figs 15, 24); internal ducts running anteriorly from CO then posteriorly to SP (Figs 16, 25)........................................................ G. amendoim sp. n.</p> <p>15(14) MS roughly rectangular, slightly wider anteriorly; epigynal pockets roughly two times wider than long (Figs 4, 13)............................................................................................ G. alpahuayo sp. n.</p> <p>- MS roughly trapezoid, widest posteriorly; epigynal pockets roughly four times wider than long (Rheims 2010a: fig. 17)............................................................................................. G. manauara</p> <p>16(13) MS with epigynal pockets as wide as long or slightly longer than wide (Figs 29, 38; Rheims 2010a: fig. 36)............ 17</p> <p>- MS with epigynal pockets much wider than long (Figs 46, 55)................................ G. muirapinima sp. n.</p> <p>17(16) MS at least three times wider anteriorly with curved epigynal ledges (Rheims 2010a: 36); internal ducts running mediad, then posteriad, then laterad from CO to slightly convoluted SP (Rheims 2010a: fig. 37)........................... G. urucu</p> <p>- MS one and a half times wider anteriorly without curved epigynal ledges (Figs 29, 38); internal ducts running sinuously posteriad towards U-shaped SP (Figs 30, 39)........................................................ G. mapia sp. n.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F857412E7CFF5BF8D9A1E7F9CF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
D57D87F857422E78FF5BF9D3A03FFE32.text	D57D87F857422E78FF5BF9D3A03FFE32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Guadana alpahuayo Rheims 2021	<div><p>Guadana alpahuayo sp. n.</p> <p>Figs 1−14, 57, 67, 81</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: ♂ from PERU: Loreto: Iquitos, San Juan Bautista, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.3753&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-3.8298" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.3753/lat -3.8298)">Zungarococha</a>, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.3753&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-3.8298" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.3753/lat -3.8298)">Arboretum</a> del UNAP (-3.8298, -73.3753), 8−9 April 2013, C.A. Rheims &amp; R. P. Indicatti leg. (MUSM). Paratypes: 2♂, 2♀, with the same data as holotype (IBSP 166391, 165059, MUSM).</p> <p>Etymology. The specific name refers to the Alpahuayo Mishana National Park, that is adjacent to the type locality; noun in apposition.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Males of G. alpahuayo sp. n. resemble those of G. arawak sp. n. by the palps with embolus bearing a sub-distal keel at tip (Figs 67−68) and dRTA barely reaching the proximal margin of the alveolus (Figs 2, 18). They are distinguished from the latter species by the basal projection with smooth margins (Figs 2, 11, 67) (jagged in the latter species). Females resemble those of G. manauara by the epigyne with MS bearing pair of epigynal pockets, opening anteriorly and medially connected (Figs 4, 77). They are distinguished from the latter species by the MS roughly rectangular, slightly wider anteriorly (much wider posteriorly in G. manauara); epigynal pockets roughly two times wider than long (four times wider than long in G. manauara) and by the presence of scape-like projection at the posterior margin of the epigynal pockets (Figs 4, 13).</p> <p>Description. Male (holotype): Prosoma pale brownish orange with pale brown margins and irregular pale brown marks between thoracic striae and at base of cephalic region; fovea and thoracic striae pale brown; eye borders black. Chelicerae, legs and palps pale yellowish orange with brownish gray marks at base of setae and spines. Labium brownish orange, distally cream colored. Endites pale yellowish orange. Sternum yellowish with brown margins. Opisthosoma pale yellowish cream colored; dorsally with two pairs of round muscular impressions, the posterior largest; ventrally with two curved lines of muscle impressions. Spinnerets pale yellowish cream colored (Figs 6−7). Total length 6.4. Prosoma 3.0 long, 3.4 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.0 long, 2.5 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.10, 0.20, 0.16, 0.22; interdistances: 0.08, 0.02, 0.24, 0.22, 0.22, 0.20. Legs: I: 24.4 (6.2, 1.7, 7.1, 6.9, 2.5); II: 27.2 (6.8, 1.8, 8.0, 7.8, 2.8); III: 17.2 (4.8, 1.3, 4.8, 4.7, 1.6); IV: 19.5 (5.0, 1.4, 5.0, 6.0, 2.1). Palp: vRTA triangular; dRTA distally bifid, with one branch conical and the other slightly laminar and distally blunt; DTA subdistally curved retrolaterally; conductor hyaline, with the same width throughout its entire length; embolus strongly curved prolaterally, with basal projection with pointed tip (Figs 1−3, 10−12, 57, 67).</p> <p>Female (IBSP 165059): Coloration pattern as in male; prosoma, chelicerae, legs and palps lighter; opisthosoma darker, pale brownish-gray. Total length 7.6. Prosoma: 3.5 long, 3.4 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.9 long, 3.5 wide. Eyes: 0.18, 0.22, 0.18, 0.24; interdistances: 0.14, 0.06, 0.30, 0.28, 0.26, 0.24. Legs: I: 18.3 (5.0, 1.7, 5.5, 4.4, 1.7); II: 20.2 (5.9, 1.8, 6.0, 4.8, 1.7); III: 14.4 (4.4, 1.3, 3.8, 3.7, 1.2); IV: 15.8 (4.6, 1.2, 4.0, 4.3, 1.7). Epigyne: epigynal field wider than long; MS longer than wide (Figs. 4, 13). Vulva: internal ducts running postero-mediad from CO, then posteriad towards SP; SP roughly ovoid; FD short, anteriad (Figs 5, 14).</p> <p>Variation. Males (n = 3): total length 5.9−6.4; prosoma 2.9−3.0; femur I 6.2−6.8. Females (n = 2): total length 6.6−7.6; prosoma 3.0−3.5; femur I 4.9−5.0.</p> <p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in northeastern Peru (Fig. 81).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F857422E78FF5BF9D3A03FFE32	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
D57D87F857462E78FF5BFD8EA026FA22.text	D57D87F857462E78FF5BFD8EA026FA22.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Guadana amendoim Rheims 2021	<div><p>Guadana amendoim sp. n.</p> <p>Figs 15−16, 20−21, 24−25</p> <p>Type material: Holotype: ♀ from BRAZIL: Acre: Senador Guiomard, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-67.6167&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-10.0667" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -67.6167/lat -10.0667)">Reserva Extrativista de Catuaba</a> [-10.0667, -67.6167], 2002, E. Morato et al. leg. (IBSP 98083). Paratype: 1♀, same data as holotype (IBSP 135243).</p> <p>Etymology. The specific name means peanut in Portuguese and refers to a traditional festival (Festival do Amendoim) from Senador Guiomard, type locality of the species; noun in apposition.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Females of G. amendoim sp. n. resemble those of G. alpahuayo sp. n. and G. manauara by the epigyne with MS bearing pair of epigynal pockets (Figs 4, 15, 77). They are distinguished in having the pockets separated and opening posteriorly (Figs 15, 24) (medially connected and opening anteriorly in the latter species). Males are unknown.</p> <p>Description. Female (holotype): Prosoma pale brownish orange with sub-marginal pale brown stripes and two small irregular pale brown marks at the base of cephalic region; fovea and thoracic striae pale brown; eye borders black. Chelicerae, legs and palps pale orange with small brown spots. Labium brown. Endites pale yellowish-cream, darker at base; sternum pale yellowish-orange with brown margins. Opisthosoma pale gray; dorsally with lighter lateral margins with few whitish guanine spots and two pairs of rounded brown muscle impressions; ventrally with scattered whitish guanine spots and pair of curved lines of muscle impressions; spinnerets pale yellowish orange (Figs 20−21). Total length 7.5. Prosoma: 3.1 long, 3.2 wide. Opisthosoma: 4.2 long, 3.5 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.17, 0.20, 0.15, 0.22; interdistances: 0.13, 0.06, 0.31, 0.26, 0.27, 0.24. Legs (2143): I: 13.9 (4.0, 1.4, 4.0, 3.3, 1.2); II: 15.6 (4.6, 1.5, 4.5, 3.7, 1.3); III: 11.9 (3.7, 1.2, 3.1, 2.9, 1.0); IV: 12.6 (3.7, 1.0, 3.3, 3.4, 1.2). Epigyne: epigynal field slightly wider than long with lateral muscle attachment bands; MS squared, slightly longer than wide; paired epigynal pockets two times wider than long (Figs 15, 24). Vulva: internal ducts running anteriad from CO then posteriad to SP; SP oval; FD antero-laterad (mating plugs blocking CO)(Figs 16, 25).</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Variation. Females (n = 2): total length 7.5−8.2; prosoma length 3.0−3.1.</p> <p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in northwestern Brazil (Fig. 81).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F857462E78FF5BFD8EA026FA22	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
D57D87F857462E74FF5BF9ABA035FE33.text	D57D87F857462E74FF5BF9ABA035FE33.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Guadana arawak Rheims 2021	<div><p>Guadana arawak sp. n.</p> <p>Figs 17−19, 22−23, 26−28, 58, 68</p> <p>Type material: Holotype: ♂ from FRENCH GUIANA: Regina Commune: <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-52.6667&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.0833" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -52.6667/lat 4.0833)">Nouragues National Reserve</a> (Research Station) (4.0833, -52.6667), 5 May 2010, V. Vedel leg. (MNHN).</p> <p>Etymology. The specific name refers to the Arawak Indians, the first people known to inhabit French Guiana; noun in apposition.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Males of G. arawak sp. n. resemble those of G. alpahuayo sp. n. by the palps with embolus bearing a subdistal keel at tip (Figs. 67−68) and dRTA barely reaching the proximal margin of the alveolus (Figs 2, 18). They are distinguished from those of the latter species by the basal projection with jagged margin (smooth in the other species) (Figs 18, 68). Females are unknown.</p> <p>Description. Male (holotype): prosoma pale brownish orange; cephalic region with three longitudinal, pale brown stripes running from posterior eyes to fovea; thoracic region with pale brown marks laterally; fovea and thoracic striae brown; eye borders black; clypeus pale yellow with dark brown antero-lateral margins. Chelicerae pale yellow with rounded brown proximal marks. Legs and palps pale brownish yellow with brown spots at the base of spines. Labium and endites pale brownish-orange at base, distally pale yellow. Sternum pale yellowish cream colored with brown margins. Opisthosoma pale yellow with no distinctive pattern; dorsally with two large, oval muscle impressions; ventrally with pair of curved lines of muscle impressions (Figs 22−23). Total length 6.1. Prosoma: 2.8 long, 2.8 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.1 long, 2.3 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.18, 0.20, 0.16, 0.22; interdistances: 0.10, 0.02, 0.26, 0.22, 0.20, 0.18. Legs (2143): I: 19.8 (5.2, 1.5, 5.8, 5.3, 2.0); II: 21.4 (5.6, 1.5, 6.3, 6.0, 2.0); III: 14.1 (3.9, 1.1, 3.9, 3.9, 1.3); IV: 16.4 (4.3, 1.1, 4.4, 4.9, 1.7). Palp: vRTA triangular, similar in size to dRTA; dRTA distally bifid, with one branch tappering and the other laminar; DTA sinuous in ventral view, subdistally curved retrolaterally; conductor hyaline, same width throughout the entire length; embolus strongly curved prolaterally (Figs 17−19, 26−28, 58, 68).</p> <p>Female: unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in the French Guiana (Fig. 81).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F857462E74FF5BF9ABA035FE33	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
D57D87F8574A2E74FF5BFD8EA051FA9B.text	D57D87F8574A2E74FF5BFD8EA051FA9B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Guadana mapia Rheims 2021	<div><p>Guadana mapia sp. n.</p> <p>Figs 29−30, 34−35, 38−39</p> <p>Type material: Holotype: ♀ from BRAZIL: <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-59.5833&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-4.3833" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -59.5833/lat -4.3833)">Amazonas</a>: <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-59.5833&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-4.3833" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -59.5833/lat -4.3833)">Borba</a>, Rio Mapiá [-4.3833, -59.5833], 22 April 1996, Equipe IBSP / SMNK leg. (IBSP 8825).</p> <p>Etymology. The specific name refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Females of S. mapia sp. n. resemble those of S. muirapinima sp. n. and S. urucu by the epigyne with MS bearing a single anterior epigynal pocket (Figs 29, 46, 79). They are distinguished from those of S. muirapinima sp. n. by the pocket as wide as long (much wider than long in the latter species) and from S. urucu by the median septum roughly rectangular, with sinuous lateral margins (roughly trapezoid in the latter species) (Fig. 29). Males are unknown.</p> <p>Description. Female (holotype): Prosoma pale brownish yellow with irregular brown marks between thoracic striae and at the base of cephalic region; fovea and thoracic striae brown; eye borders black. Chelicerae, legs and palps yellowish orange with faint pale brown marks at the base of spines and setae. Labium brown, distally orange brown. Endites yellowish cream colored, Sternum yellowish cream colored with brown margins. Opisthosoma dorsally brownish yellow with gray marks around pale heart mark and one pair of brown muscle impressions; ventrally brownish cream colored with two curved lines of muscle impressions. Spinnerets pale yellow (Figs 34−35). Total length 6.8. Prosoma: 3.1 long, 3.2 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.6 long, 2.7 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.19, 0.24, 0.17, 0.25; interdistances: 0.15, 0.05, 0.32, 0.30, 0.29, 0.30. Legs (2143): I: 16.6 (4.7, 1.5, 4.9, 4.0, 1.5); II: 18.6 (5.3, 1.7, 5.6, 4.5, 1.5); III: 13.2 (4.0, 1.0, 3.6, 3.3, 1.3); IV: 14.5 (4.3, 1.1, 3.8, 3.8, 1.5). Epigyne: epigynal field longer than wide; anterior epigynal pocket wider than long, opening posteriorly; MS longer than wide (Figs 29, 38). Vulva: internal ducts sinuous, running posteriad; SP u-shaped; FD short, anteriad (Figs 30, 39).</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in northern Brazil (Fig. 81).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F8574A2E74FF5BFD8EA051FA9B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
D57D87F8574A2E6CFF5BFA66A7BFFDFB.text	D57D87F8574A2E6CFF5BFA66A7BFFDFB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Guadana muirapinima Rheims 2021	<div><p>Guadana muirapinima sp. n.</p> <p>Figs 43−56, 60, 70</p> <p>Type material: Holotype: ♂, from BRAZIL: Pará: Juruti, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-56.1776&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-2.5076" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -56.1776/lat -2.5076)">Beneficiamento</a>, ponto 1 (-2.5076, -56.1776), 7 January 2012, E.G.S. Cafofo Silva leg. (MPEG 30837). Paratypes: BRAZIL: Pará: 1♀, Juruti, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-56.2082&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-2.4728" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -56.2082/lat -2.4728)">Platô Capiranga</a>, linha 168E (-2.4728, -56.2082), 9 February 2007, N.F. Lo Man Hung leg. (MPEG 30688); 1♀, Juruti (-2.4643, -56.0024) (MPEG 30677).</p> <p>Etymology. The specific name refers to the original inhabitants of the margins of the old Juruti Lake, currently the oldest part of the city of Juruti. It is also the name of a tree of good solid timber, that is common to the region; noun in apposition.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Males of G. muirapinima sp. n. are distinguished from all other congeners by the palp with embolus bearing a bifid basal projection, with one branch long, distally widened and tapering towards tip and one shorter, distally semi-rounded branch (Figs 44, 70). Females resemble those of S. mapia sp. n. and S. urucu by the epigyne with MS bearing single epigynal pocket (Figs 29, 46, 79). They are distinguished from the latter species by the pocket much wider than long (as long as wide, or longer than wide in the latter species) (Figs 46, 55).</p> <p>Description. Male (holotype): Prosoma brownish orange with two irregular pale brown marks at the base of cephalic region and reticulated marks along lateral margins and between thoracic striae; fovea and thoracic striae pale brown; eye borders black. Chelicerae, legs and palps yellowish orange with gray marks at the base of striae and setae. Labium brown, distally pale brown. Endites pale yellowish orange, distally pale yellow. Sternum pale yellow with pale brown margins. Opisthosoma yellowish gray; dorsally with pale yellow marks laterally and pair of rounded, brown muscle impressions; ventrally with two lines of curved muscle impressions. Spinnerets yellowish cream colored (Figs 48−49). Total length 6.5. Prosoma: 3.2 long, 3.0 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.2 long, 2.3 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.24, 0.23, 0.15, 0.26; interdistances: 0.10, 0.03, 0.33, 0.30, 0.26, 0.23. Legs (2143): I: 23.2 (6.0, 1.7, 6.9, 6.3, 2.3); II: 26.1 (6.8, 1.7, 7.7, 7.4, 2.5); III: 16.1 (4.6, 1.2, 4.4, 4.4, 1.5); IV: 18.7 (5.1, 1.1, 4.9, 5.6, 2.0). Palp: vRTA reduced to a small bump on tibia; dRTA concave, distally widened with medially depressed tip; DTA roughly straight, abruptly narrowed at tip; small tegular projection present close to embolus base; conductor hyaline, same width throughout its entire length; embolus filiform, strongly curved prolaterally (Figs 43−45, 52−54; 60, 70).</p> <p>Female (MPEG 30677): Coloration pattern as in male, slightly lighter (Figs 50−51). Total length 6.7. Prosoma: 3.1 long, 3.1 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.5 long, 2.9 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.17, 0.21, 0.13, 0.24; interdistances: 0.20, 0.06, 0.31, 0.32, 0.30, 0.30. Legs (2143): I: 16.9 (4.8, 1.7, 5.0, 4.0, 1.4); II: 18.5 (5.3, 1.8, 5.5, 4.4, 1.5); III: 12.9 (4.0, 1.2, 3.4, 3.1, 1.2); IV: 14.5 (4.2, 1.1, 3.7, 4.0, 1.5). Epigyne: epigynal field as wide as long; MS as wide as long, widest anteriorly; epigynal pocket seven times wider than long (Figs 46, 55). Vulva: internal ducts running anteriad from CO, then posteriad towards SP; SP U-shaped; FD short, anteriad (Figs 47, 56).</p> <p>Variation. Females (n = 2): total length 6.7−7.6; prosoma length 3.1−3.5; femur I length 4.8−5.0.</p> <p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in Brazil (Fig. 81).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F8574A2E6CFF5BFA66A7BFFDFB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
D57D87F857522E6DFF5BF8EFA7C8FCBE.text	D57D87F857522E6DFF5BF8EFA7C8FCBE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Guadana ucayali Rheims 2021	<div><p>Guadana ucayali sp. n.</p> <p>Figs 31−33, 36−37, 40−42, 65, 72</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: ♂ from PERU: Loreto: Jenaro Herrera Province, Requena District, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.65053&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-4.8944163" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.65053/lat -4.8944163)">Centro de Investigaciones Jenaro Herrera</a> (04°53’39.9”S, 73°39’01.9”W), 2 April 2013, C.A. Rheims &amp; R. P. Indicatti leg. (MUSM).</p> <p>Etymology. The specific name refers to Ucayali River, where the type locality is located; noun in apposition.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Males of S. ucayali sp n. resemble those of S. urucu by the palp with conductor distally widened (Fig. 32, Rheims 2010a: figs 34−35). They are distinguished from the latter species by the dRTA bearing two thornlike projections at tip (dRTA with single, hooked-shaped projection in S. urucu) and by the embolus with basal projection partly membranous (all sclerotized in S. urucu) (Figs 23, 41). Females are unknown.</p> <p>Description. Male (holotype): Prosoma pale yellow with grayish black margins and marks between thoracic striae and two orange brown marks at the base of cephalic region extending towards PLE; margins flanked by long, black, needle-like setae; fovea and thoracic striae orange brown; eye area slightly more orange than rest of prosoma; eye borders black; clypeus pale yellow. Chelicerae pale yellow with pair of grayish black marks at base. Legs pale yellow with small grayish black spots at the base of setae and larger round marks at the base of spines. Palps pale yellow with round, grayish black marks at the base of femoral spines. Sternum cream colored with pale brown margins. Endites cream colored. Labium orange, distally cream colored. Opisthosoma pale gray. Dorsally with pair of round, muscular impressions on posterior half, white spots laterally and covered by orange setae. Ventrally with white spots laterally (Figs 36−37). Total length 6.0. Prosoma: 2.7 long, 2.8 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.2 long, 2.4 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.18, 0.22, 0.16, 0.22; interdistances: 0.10, 0.02, 0.26, 0.26, 0.26, 0.26. Legs (2143): I: 23.6 (6.1, 1.6, 6.9, 6.5, 2.5); II: 26.0 (6.7, 1.7, 7.6, 7.5, 2.5); III: 16.3 (4.6, 1.2, 4.4, 4.5, 1.6); IV: 18.7 (5.0, 1.1, 4.8, 5.7, 2.1). Palp: vRTA small, triangular; dRTA laminar; DTA abruptly narrowed and curved at tip; conductor hyaline; embolus filiform, strongly curved prolaterally, with basal projection with pointed tip (Figs 31−33, 40−42, 65, 72).</p> <p>Female. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in Peru (Fig. 82).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F857522E6DFF5BF8EFA7C8FCBE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
D57D87F857542E6BFF5BF89DA76BFDCC.text	D57D87F857542E6BFF5BF89DA76BFDCC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sparianthina Banks 1929	<div><p>Genus Sparianthina Banks, 1929</p> <p>Sparianthina Banks, 1929: 80 (Type species Sparianthina selenopoides Banks by original designation).</p> <p>Emended diagnosis. Species of Sparianthina resemble those of Guadana in having intermarginal denticles arranged in a row; two pairs of ventral spines on tibiae I−II and one lateral spine on each side of metatarsi I−II (see Jäger et al. 2009: figs 10, 33; Rheims 2010a: fig. 7); male palps with a strong dorsal tegular apophysis (DTA) (Figs 57−66, 94−102); and female palps with a long-toothed claw (Jäger et al. 2009: figs 13, 64). Males are distinguished from those of the latter genus by the palps with DTA roundly blunt, bifid, or widened at tip (Figs 94−102); and embolus with basal projection at the retrolateral or ventral side of the embolus (Figs 103−111) (DTA acutely tapering and embolus with basal projection absent or at the prolateral side of the embolus in Guadana). Females are distinguished by the epigyne with median septum smooth, without ledges or pockets (Figs 83, 112−116) (present in Guadana) and vulva bearing glandular projection and fertilization ducts long (Fig. 84; Jäger et al. 2009: figs 15, 29, 59; Rheims 2011: figs 5, 13) (glandular projection absent and fertilization ducts short in Guadana).</p> <p>Distribution. Southern Central America and Northern South America, with records in Costa Rica, Panamá, Colombia, Venezuela and Trinidad &amp; Tobago (Figs 117−118).</p> <p>Composition. Ten species: Sparianthina adisi; S. boyaca sp. nov.; S. deltshevi; S. gaita; S. milleri; S. parang; S. pumilla; S. saaristoi; S. selenopoides; S. soca sp. nov.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F857542E6BFF5BF89DA76BFDCC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
D57D87F857552E6BFF5BFDD1A1E7F919.text	D57D87F857552E6BFF5BFDD1A1E7F919.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sparianthina Banks 1929	<div><p>Identification key for all known species of Sparianthina</p> <p>1 Males.............................................................................................. 2</p> <p>- Females........................................................................................... 10</p> <p>2(1) Embolus with medial spine-like projection (Figs 103−104, 108, 109)............................................ 3</p> <p>- Embolus without medial spine-like projection (Figs 105−107, 110−111).......................................... 6</p> <p>3(2) Embolus with basal projection single, filiform (Figs 103−104, 109).............................................. 4</p> <p>- Embolus with basal projection bifid with one branch laminar and distally blunt and one branch pointed (Fig. 108; Jäger et al. 2009: figs 22−23)............................................................................. S. pumilla</p> <p>4(3) RTA subdistally bifid, with ventral branch shorter than dorsal branch (Jäger et al. 2009: figs 69−70, 72−73); embolus two and a half times longer than wide (Figs 104, 109)............................................................... 5</p> <p>- RTA subdistally bifid, with ventral branch longer and wider than dorsal branch (Jäger et al. 2009: figs 66−67) embolus almost as wide as long (Fig. 103)......................................................................... S. adisi</p> <p>5(4) RTA distally blunt in retrolateral view (Jäger et al. 2009: fig 70); DTA pointing retrolaterad (Fig. 95).......... S. deltshevi</p> <p>- RTA distally pointed in retrolateral view (Jäger et al. 2009: fig.73); DTA pointing anteriad (Fig. 100).......... S. saaristoi</p> <p>6(2) Embolus with basal projection single (Figs 103−107, 109−110)................................................. 7</p> <p>- Embolus with basal projection bifid, with one branch short, laminar and distally curved and one larger slightly concave (Fig. 111)...................................................................................... S. soca sp. n.</p> <p>7(6) DTA without projections (Figs 96, 98, 101)................................................................. 8</p> <p>- DTA with subdistal triangular projection (Fig. 97)..................................................... S. milleri</p> <p>8(7) DTA not strongly curved retrolaterally (Figs 98, 101); embolus with wide base, abruptly narrowed towards tip (Figs 107, 110)................................................................................................... 9</p> <p>- DTA C-shaped, strongly curved retrolaterally; embolus gradually tapering (Figs 96, 105)....................... S. gaita</p> <p>9(8) Embolus with rectangular base and basal projection gutter-shaped (Fig. 107); DTA gently curved (Fig. 98)....... S. parang</p> <p>- Embolus with elliptical base and basal projection straight and laminar (Fig. 110); DTA strongly bent dorsally (Fig. 101)............................................................................................ S. selenopoides</p> <p>10(1) Median septum with well-defined anterior atrium (Figs 83, 113−116); internal ducts strongly convoluted (Figs 84−85; Jäger et al. 2009: figs 15, 29, 59; Rheims 2011: fig. 5)............................................................. 11</p> <p>- Median septum without well-defined anterior atrium (Fig. 112); internal ducts not convoluted (Rheims 2011: figs 13−14)................................................................................................. S. gaita</p> <p>11(10) Lateral lobes converging and touching posteriorly (Figs 113−114).............................................. 12</p> <p>- Lateral lobes not touching posteriorly (Figs 83, 115−116).................................................... 13</p> <p>12(11) Median septum gradually narrowing posteriorly from anterior atrium (Fig. 114); glandular projection rounded, short (Rheims 2011: fig. 5).................................................................................. S. parang</p> <p>- Median septum constricted by lateral lobes close to anterior atrium (Fig. 113); glandular projection long, cylindrical (Jäger et al 2009: figs 59−60)............................................................................. S. milleri</p> <p>13(11) Lateral lobes touching each other medially (Figs 115−116)................................................... 14</p> <p>- Lateral lobes not touching each other (Fig. 83).................................................. S. boyaca sp. n.</p> <p>14(13) Anterior atrium rectangular, two times wider than long (Fig. 116).................................... S. selenopoides</p> <p>- Anterior atrium slightly rounded, as wide as long (Fig. 115)............................................ S. pumilla</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F857552E6BFF5BFDD1A1E7F919	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
D57D87F857552E67FF5BF8ECA780FE6B.text	D57D87F857552E67FF5BF8ECA780FE6B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sparianthina boyaca Rheims 2021	<div><p>Sparianthina boyaca sp. n.</p> <p>Figs 83−85</p> <p>Type material: Holotype: ♀ from COLOMBIA: Boyacá: [4.6776, -74.1485], between <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-74.1485&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.6776" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -74.1485/lat 4.6776)">Alto Belen</a> and San Jose, 23 September 1985, J. Sturm leg. (MCZ 46472).</p> <p>Etymology. The specific name refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Females of S. boyaca sp. n. resemble those of S. gaita, S. parang and S selenopoides by the presence of an anterior, transversal furrow on the epigyne (Figs 83, 112, 114, 116). They are distinguished from S. gaita by the presence of an anterior atrium bearing the CO (absent in the latter species) and from S. parang and S. selenopoides by the lateral lobes completely separated by the MS (Fig. 83) (touching each other posteriorly in S. parang and medially in S. selenopoides).</p> <p>Description. Female (holotype): Prosoma brownish orange with dark brown margins and brown marks along thoracic striae, lateral margins of cephalic region and extending posteriorly from between PME; fovea brown; eye borders black. Chelicerae and palps brownish orange. Legs brownish orange with large pale brown spots at the base of spines. Labium pale brownish orange, distally cream colored. Endites pale yellowish cream, distally cream colored. Sternum pale yellow with pale orange margins. Opisthosoma cream colored with no distinctive pattern; dorsally with two pairs of round brown muscle impressions; ventrally with two slightly curved lines of muscle impressions. Spinnerets yellowish-cream colored. Total length 10.9. Prosoma: 3.8 long, 3.5 wide. Opisthosoma: 6.8 long, 5.1 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.20, 0.26, 0.20, 0.26; interdistances: 0.10, 0.06, 0.30, 0.28, 0.22, 0.20. Legs (2143): I: 13.7 (3.8, 1.8, 3.6, 3.2, 1.3); II: 14.8 (4.4, 1.8, 3.9, 3.4, 1.3); III: 12.0 (3.7, 1.4, 3.0, 2.8, 1.1); IV: 13.5 (4.0, 1.4, 3.3, 3.5, 1.3). Epigyne: epigynal field longer than wide; lateral lobes running parallel and diverging posteriorly; anterior atrium oval, wider than long (Fig. 83). Vulva: internal ducts strongly convoluted; glandular projection small, rounded, close to CO; SP elongated, curved anteriorly; FD long, curved, antero-laterad (Figs 84−85).</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in Colombia (Fig. 117).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F857552E67FF5BF8ECA780FE6B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
D57D87F8575A2E64FF5BFB28A019F838.text	D57D87F8575A2E64FF5BFB28A019F838.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sparianthina soca Rheims 2021	<div><p>Sparianthina soca sp. n.</p> <p>Figs 86−93, 102, 111</p> <p>Type material: Holotype: ♂ from TRINIDAD &amp; TOBAGO: Arima: Arima, Road to Blanchisseuse (-10.7061, -61.2914), 29 June 1999, R. <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-61.2914&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-10.7061" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -61.2914/lat -10.7061)">Pinto da Rocha</a> leg. (MZSP 18829).</p> <p>Etymology. The specific name refers to a type of dance music common in Trinidad, which is a mix of Calypso, Indian music and rhythms; noun in apposition.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Males of S. soca sp. n. resemble those of S. pumilla by the embolus with a bifid basal projection (Figs 108, 111). They are distinguished from the latter species by the embolus with no additional projections (medial spine-like projection present in S. pumilla) and by the basal projection with dorsal branch wide, concave and ventral branch shorter, laminar, distally rounded (dorsal branch tapering and ventral branch longer and distally blunt in S. pumilla). Females are unknown.</p> <p>Description. Male (holotype): Prosoma pale orange with brown margins and slightly darker thoracic striae; fovea pale brown; eye borders black. Chelicerae, legs and palps pale yellow, lighter than prosoma; legs with brownish gray marks at the base of spines. Labium pale brown, distally pale orange. Endites pale yellowish orange. Sternum pale yellowish orange with pale brown margins. Opisthosoma pale gray; dorsally with pair of rounded muscular impressions; ventrally with two posteriorly converging lines of muscle impressions; spinnerets pale yellow (Figs 89−90). Total length 6.3. Prosoma: 2.8 long, 2.7 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.3 long, 1.9 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.15, 0.20, 0.15, 0.25; interdistances: 0.15, 0.06, 0.26, 0.30, 0.29, 0.30. Legs (2143): I: 18.9 (4.9, 1.5, 5.5, 5.0, 2.0); II: 21.3 (5.5, 1.7, 6.2, 5.6, 2.3); III: 11.6 (4.3, 1.3, 4.2, 4.2, 1.6); IV: 17.9 (4.8, 1.2, 4.7, 5.3, 1.9). Palp: dRTA concave (slightly gutter-shaped in ventral view), longer than wide; DTA finger-like, gently curved retrolaterally at tip; embolus tapering; small, triangular tegular projection present, close to embolus base (Figs 91−93, 102, 111).</p> <p>Female: Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in Trinidad &amp; Tobago (Fig. 118).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F8575A2E64FF5BFB28A019F838	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
D57D87F8575B2E62FF5BF8EDA012FF1B.text	D57D87F8575B2E62FF5BF8EDA012FF1B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sparianthina rufescens (Mello-Leitao 1940)	<div><p>Sparianthina rufescens (Mello-Leitão, 1940)</p> <p>Anaptomecus rufescens Mello-Leitão, 1940: 180, figs 8−9 (♀ holotype from GUYANA: <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-58.6312&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=6.3648" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -58.6312/lat 6.3648)">Essequibo River</a> [6.3648, -58.6312], A.W. Richards, Oxford University Expedition K.B.G., NHM 1930.1164.3491, examined)</p> <p>Sparianthina rufescens: Jäger et al. 2009: 133, figs 71−73, 79.</p> <p>Note. While studying additional material of S. rufescens I observed that females of this species do not have the longtoothed palpal claw which is characteristic for the genus and subfamily. Thus, it is here considered incertae sedis until further studies are carried out and the placement of the species can be determined.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D57D87F8575B2E62FF5BF8EDA012FF1B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rheims, Cristina A.	Rheims, Cristina A. (2021): The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 5061 (3): 401-431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1
