taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03A687CEFFCB0E72FC6488C7FDACF9ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5636867/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636867	Figure 2. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree of Helicopsis and related groups based on sequences of the mitochondrial 16S rDNA. Nodes supported by posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 are marked by a dot. For information about sequenced specimens and detailed support values, see Supporting Information, Figure S1 and Table S1.	Figure 2. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree of Helicopsis and related groups based on sequences of the mitochondrial 16S rDNA. Nodes supported by posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 are marked by a dot. For information about sequenced specimens and detailed support values, see Supporting Information, Figure S1 and Table S1.	2020-12-22	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard			
03A687CEFFCB0E72FC6488C7FDACF9ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5636865/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636865	Figure 1. Sampled Helicopsis populations in Ukraine, the adjacent Central Russian Upland and Romania and distribution of mitochondrial haplotype clades: H. lunulata (yellow dots), H. hungarica (magenta triangles) and H. filimargo (clade A, red diamonds, clade B, green diamonds and mixed population of clades A and B, blue diamonds).	Figure 1. Sampled Helicopsis populations in Ukraine, the adjacent Central Russian Upland and Romania and distribution of mitochondrial haplotype clades: H. lunulata (yellow dots), H. hungarica (magenta triangles) and H. filimargo (clade A, red diamonds, clade B, green diamonds and mixed population of clades A and B, blue diamonds).	2020-12-22	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard			
03A687CEFFCB0E72FC6488C7FDACF9ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5636869/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636869	Figure 3. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree of European Helicopsis based on concatenated sequences of the mitochondrial COI, 12S rDNA and 16S rDNA. Support values at the nodes correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities (left), maximum likelihood (middle) and maximum parsimony (right) bootstrap values. Extraction voucher numbers are given at the tips of the tree. For information about sequenced specimens, see Supporting Information, Table S1.	Figure 3. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree of European Helicopsis based on concatenated sequences of the mitochondrial COI, 12S rDNA and 16S rDNA. Support values at the nodes correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities (left), maximum likelihood (middle) and maximum parsimony (right) bootstrap values. Extraction voucher numbers are given at the tips of the tree. For information about sequenced specimens, see Supporting Information, Table S1.	2020-12-22	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard			
03A687CEFFCB0E72FC6488C7FDACF9ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5636871/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636871	Figure 4. Neighbour-net network of Helicopsis from Ukraine based on Jaccard distances obtained from AFLP data. Coloration of clusters corresponds to the STRUCTURE solution for K = 2. Red corresponds to H. filimargo, yellow to H. lunulata. DNA voucher numbers for specimens are given at the tips of the network. Coloured dots at the tips of the network correspond to cluster assignments (on majority-rule basis) of specimens in the STRUCTURE solutions for K = 5 (inner) and K = 7 (outer). For locality data and the distribution of clusters, see also Supporting Information, Table S1 and Figure 6, respectively.	Figure 4. Neighbour-net network of Helicopsis from Ukraine based on Jaccard distances obtained from AFLP data. Coloration of clusters corresponds to the STRUCTURE solution for K = 2. Red corresponds to H. filimargo, yellow to H. lunulata. DNA voucher numbers for specimens are given at the tips of the network. Coloured dots at the tips of the network correspond to cluster assignments (on majority-rule basis) of specimens in the STRUCTURE solutions for K = 5 (inner) and K = 7 (outer). For locality data and the distribution of clusters, see also Supporting Information, Table S1 and Figure 6, respectively.	2020-12-22	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard			
03A687CEFFCB0E72FC6488C7FDACF9ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5636873/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636873	Figure 5. Assignment of specimens of Helicopsis from Ukraine to clusters resulting from the admixture analysis of AFLP data with STRUCTURE. A, solution for K = 2. B, solution for K = 5. C, solution for K = 7. Numbers below the plots refer to populations (see Fig. 6; Supporting Information, Table S1). Letters above the plots refer to mitochondrial clades: a, H. filimargo (clade A); b, H. filimargo (clade B); l, H. lunulata.	Figure 5. Assignment of specimens of Helicopsis from Ukraine to clusters resulting from the admixture analysis of AFLP data with STRUCTURE. A, solution for K = 2. B, solution for K = 5. C, solution for K = 7. Numbers below the plots refer to populations (see Fig. 6; Supporting Information, Table S1). Letters above the plots refer to mitochondrial clades: a, H. filimargo (clade A); b, H. filimargo (clade B); l, H. lunulata.	2020-12-22	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard			
03A687CEFFCB0E72FC6488C7FDACF9ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5636879/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636879	Figure 7. Relationships between Jaccard distances between individuals of Helicopsis filimargo and H. lunulata based on AFLP data and logarithmized geographical distances. Black circles and red triangles: distances between individuals belonging to H. filimargo and H. lunulata, respectively; green crosses: distances between individuals belonging to different species; black and red broken lines: regression lines fitted within species; green broken line: regression line fitted on the within-group distances only (i.e. the black circles and red triangles taken together); green solid line: regression line fitted on all distances together; blue lines: centres of the betweengroups geographical distances.	Figure 7. Relationships between Jaccard distances between individuals of Helicopsis filimargo and H. lunulata based on AFLP data and logarithmized geographical distances. Black circles and red triangles: distances between individuals belonging to H. filimargo and H. lunulata, respectively; green crosses: distances between individuals belonging to different species; black and red broken lines: regression lines fitted within species; green broken line: regression line fitted on the within-group distances only (i.e. the black circles and red triangles taken together); green solid line: regression line fitted on all distances together; blue lines: centres of the betweengroups geographical distances.	2020-12-22	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard			
03A687CEFFCB0E72FC6488C7FDACF9ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5636877/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636877	Figure 6. Distribution of clusters obtained from the admixture analysis of AFLP data of Helicopsis from Ukraine with STRUCTURE. A, solution for K = 2. B, solution for K = 5. C, solution for K = 7. Population numbers are given next to the bar plots (Supporting Information, Table S1). The bar plots show the proportional assignment of an individual to a cluster (see also Fig. 5).	Figure 6. Distribution of clusters obtained from the admixture analysis of AFLP data of Helicopsis from Ukraine with STRUCTURE. A, solution for K = 2. B, solution for K = 5. C, solution for K = 7. Population numbers are given next to the bar plots (Supporting Information, Table S1). The bar plots show the proportional assignment of an individual to a cluster (see also Fig. 5).	2020-12-22	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard			
03A687CEFFCB0E72FC6488C7FDACF9ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5636881/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636881	Figure 8. Distribution of Helicopsis species in Central and Eastern Europe and localities from which 16S rDNA sequences are available (symbols). The geographical boundaries of H. striata, H. hungarica and H. lunulata are not yet clear because of the lack of reliable morphological characteristics.	Figure 8. Distribution of Helicopsis species in Central and Eastern Europe and localities from which 16S rDNA sequences are available (symbols). The geographical boundaries of H. striata, H. hungarica and H. lunulata are not yet clear because of the lack of reliable morphological characteristics.	2020-12-22	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard			
03A687CEFFC00E70FF7F88D1FDBBFDCF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5636867/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636867	Figure 2. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree of Helicopsis and related groups based on sequences of the mitochondrial 16S rDNA. Nodes supported by posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 are marked by a dot. For information about sequenced specimens and detailed support values, see Supporting Information, Figure S1 and Table S1.	Figure 2. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree of Helicopsis and related groups based on sequences of the mitochondrial 16S rDNA. Nodes supported by posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 are marked by a dot. For information about sequenced specimens and detailed support values, see Supporting Information, Figure S1 and Table S1.	2020-12-22	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard			
03A687CEFFC00E70FF7F88D1FDBBFDCF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5636865/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636865	Figure 1. Sampled Helicopsis populations in Ukraine, the adjacent Central Russian Upland and Romania and distribution of mitochondrial haplotype clades: H. lunulata (yellow dots), H. hungarica (magenta triangles) and H. filimargo (clade A, red diamonds, clade B, green diamonds and mixed population of clades A and B, blue diamonds).	Figure 1. Sampled Helicopsis populations in Ukraine, the adjacent Central Russian Upland and Romania and distribution of mitochondrial haplotype clades: H. lunulata (yellow dots), H. hungarica (magenta triangles) and H. filimargo (clade A, red diamonds, clade B, green diamonds and mixed population of clades A and B, blue diamonds).	2020-12-22	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard			
03A687CEFFC00E70FF7F88D1FDBBFDCF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5636869/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636869	Figure 3. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree of European Helicopsis based on concatenated sequences of the mitochondrial COI, 12S rDNA and 16S rDNA. Support values at the nodes correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities (left), maximum likelihood (middle) and maximum parsimony (right) bootstrap values. Extraction voucher numbers are given at the tips of the tree. For information about sequenced specimens, see Supporting Information, Table S1.	Figure 3. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree of European Helicopsis based on concatenated sequences of the mitochondrial COI, 12S rDNA and 16S rDNA. Support values at the nodes correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities (left), maximum likelihood (middle) and maximum parsimony (right) bootstrap values. Extraction voucher numbers are given at the tips of the tree. For information about sequenced specimens, see Supporting Information, Table S1.	2020-12-22	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard			
03A687CEFFC00E70FF7F88D1FDBBFDCF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5636881/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636881	Figure 8. Distribution of Helicopsis species in Central and Eastern Europe and localities from which 16S rDNA sequences are available (symbols). The geographical boundaries of H. striata, H. hungarica and H. lunulata are not yet clear because of the lack of reliable morphological characteristics.	Figure 8. Distribution of Helicopsis species in Central and Eastern Europe and localities from which 16S rDNA sequences are available (symbols). The geographical boundaries of H. striata, H. hungarica and H. lunulata are not yet clear because of the lack of reliable morphological characteristics.	2020-12-22	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard		Zenodo	biologists	Balashov, Igor A.;Neiber, Marco T.;Hausdorf, Bernhard			
