identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
0C477B405A7EE568FF62FD41FE50FAE9.text	0C477B405A7EE568FF62FD41FE50FAE9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euphranta figurata (Walker 1856)	<div><p>Euphranta figurata (Walker)</p> <p>Dacus figuratus Walker 1856.</p> <p>Ichneumonomacula wangyongi Chen, 2020, syn. n.</p> <p>Ichneumonomacula wangyongi was described from a single female from Sabah, East Malaysia, in a Supplementary file (S1) to a paper on Adramini phylogeny by Chen et al. (2020). It is morphologically compatible with the holotype female of Euphranta figurata, described from Sarawak by Walker (1856) and a second female recorded and redescribed from Brunei by Chua and Hancock (1999). The three known specimens show some slight variation in wing pattern but this is common in Euphranta species. The illustration in Chua and Hancock (1999) is not fully accurate and the description gives a better indication of the specimen’s morphology. Ichneumonomacula wangyongi Chen, 2020 is therefore placed here as a new synonym of Euphranta figurata (Walker, 1856). The latter species was referred to the chrysopila group by Hancock and Drew (2004) and is now known from Sarawak, Brunei and Sabah in northern Borneo. As Ichneumonomacula Chen becomes a new synonym of Euphranta Loew, the generic limits and phylogenetic relationships between Euphranta sens. lat. and related genera suggested by Chen et al. (2020) require further investigation.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C477B405A7EE568FF62FD41FE50FAE9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	David, K. J.;Hancock, D. L.;Sachin, K.;Mahendiran, G.	David, K. J., Hancock, D. L., Sachin, K., Mahendiran, G. (2021): A new species, new postabdominal descriptions and a new synonymy in Euphranta Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetinae: Adramini). Zootaxa 5057 (1): 87-98, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.5
0C477B405A7EE568FF62FEC5FAD5FD66.text	0C477B405A7EE568FF62FEC5FAD5FD66.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euphranta Loew 1862	<div><p>Euphranta Loew, 1862</p> <p>Type species: Musca connexa Fabricius, 1794, by monotypy.</p> <p>Ichneumonomacula Chen, 2020, syn. n.</p> <p>Type species: Ichneumonomacula wangyongi Chen, 2020, by original designation.</p> <p>The name Ichneumonomacula was established for a genus with a single nominal species, which is here considered to be a synonym of a species currently included in Euphranta, and we consider the first name a junior subjective synonym of the latter name. This synonymy is based on the following synonymy of the two nominal species.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C477B405A7EE568FF62FEC5FAD5FD66	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	David, K. J.;Hancock, D. L.;Sachin, K.;Mahendiran, G.	David, K. J., Hancock, D. L., Sachin, K., Mahendiran, G. (2021): A new species, new postabdominal descriptions and a new synonymy in Euphranta Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetinae: Adramini). Zootaxa 5057 (1): 87-98, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.5
0C477B405A7EE56BFF62FAC3FA15F93F.text	0C477B405A7EE56BFF62FAC3FA15F93F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euphranta Loew 1862	<div><p>Key to species of Euphranta Loew recorded from India</p> <p>Species groups follow those named and defined by Hancock and Drew (2004) except that the signatifacies group is renamed the klugii group, the two specific names being synonymous (David et al., 2013).</p> <p>1. Thorax with 3 anepisternal setae, one medial and two posterior; wing largely dark in apical half with broad hyaline indentations and no dark transverse bands [zeylanica group: a similar species from Sri Lanka, E. zeylanica (Senior-White), lacks the broad subapical hyaline indentation in cell r 1]..................................................................... 2</p> <p>- Thorax with 2 anepisternal setae, the medial seta absent; wing variably patterned................................... 3</p> <p>2. Wing with apical dark area connected to pterostigma, the hyaline indentation at apex of stigma in cell r1 extending only to vein R 4+5; oviscape almost as long as abdomen (David et al., 2013: fig. 72)...................... E. notabilis (van der Wulp)</p> <p>- Wing with apical dark area separated from pterostigma, the hyaline indentation at apex of stigma in cell r 1 extending to posterior margin; oviscape almost as long as abdominal tergites 3–6 (Figs 4–5)....................................................................................................... E. flavothoracica David, Hancock &amp; Sachin, sp.n.</p> <p>3. Wing with 2 prominent dark transverse bands from stigma, one basally and one apically (Figs 25, 35).................. 4</p> <p>- Wing without 2 prominent dark transverse bands from stigma (Fig. 15), if with an isolated subbasal band then band from stigma interrupted and misaligned along vein R 4+5................................................................. 8</p> <p>4. Wing with a medial hyaline V-shaped marking extending from anterior margin to cell cu 1 that does not reach posterior margin (David et al., 2013: fig. 70) [lemniscata group].......................................... E. lemniscata (Enderlein)</p> <p>- Wing without a medial hyaline V-shaped marking, the hyaline band from cell r 1 at apex of stigma reaching posterior margin.................................................................................................... 5</p> <p>5. Wing with a large apical brown patch with an isolated longitudinal hyaline band in cell r2+3 (Figs 34–35; David et al., 2013: fig. 56) [klugii (formerly signatifacies) group]................................................ E. klugii (Wiedemann)</p> <p>- Wing with a complete or interrupted subapical hyaline transverse band, not with an isolated longitudinal hyaline band in cell r2+3,................................................................................................ 6</p> <p>6. Head with 2 frontal setae; face pale and unspotted; wing with subapical hyaline band strongly kinked or interrupted; apical hyaline area large, extending across cell r 4+5 into cells r 2+3 and m; stigma fuscous with a fulvous apical tip (Figs 24–25; David et al., 2013: figs 66–69) [crux group]....................................................... E. crux (Fabricius)</p> <p>- Head with 3 frontal setae; face with 2 black spots; wing with subapical hyaline band broad and continuous at least from vein R 2+3 to posterior margin; apical hyaline area narrow and confined to cell r 4+5; stigma fulvous with a dark oblique medial band [mikado group]....................................................................................... 7</p> <p>7. Face with two elongate black marks along antennal foveae; dorsocentral setae vestigial or absent; wing with dark transverse band over crossvein dm-cu quadrate and vertical in cell r1; apex of aculeus with preapical indentations (David et al., 2013: fig. 7).................................................................................... E. dysoxyli David</p> <p>- Face with two subtriangular black spots; dorsocentral setae well developed; wing with dark transverse band over crossvein dmcu narrow and oblique in cell r1; apex of aculeus acute and without preapical indentations (David et al., 2013: fig. 48; 2020: fig. 18).................................................................... E. haldwanica Hancock &amp; Goodger</p> <p>8. Wing with costal-submarginal band narrow and curved, leaving a hyaline margin in cells r 2+3 and r 4+5, plus a large and isolated dark discal patch covering both crossveins dm-cu and r-m (David et al., 2013: fig. 71) [macularis group].............................................................................................. E. macularis (Wiedemann)</p> <p>- Wing without a curved costal-submarginal band and isolated dark discal patch covering both crossveins................ 9</p> <p>9. Wing with 3 transverse dark bands and a dark subapical area, the subbasal band not connected to stigma and the 2 medial bands interrupted at vein R4+5 and misaligned; face wholly black; scutum and abdomen shiny black (Bezzi, 1913: fig. 35) [toxoneura group]............................................................................... E. nigripeda (Bezzi)</p> <p>- Wing with transverse dark bands not as above or absent, often largely hyaline or with a single short band from stigma that does not reach posterior margin; face, scutum and abdomen often not wholly black.................................... 10</p> <p>10. Head with 3 frontal setae; wing with an isolated subbasal black patch below apex of cell c and a V-shaped black band from stigma connected with transverse band over crossvein dm-cu and subapical dark area and leaving a triangulat hyaline indentation in cell r1 at apex of stigma (David et al., 2020: fig. 7) [camelliae group]........................................................................................................ E. siruvani David, Hancock &amp; Sankararaman</p> <p>- Head with 2 frontal setae; wing without an isolated subbasal black patch and largely hyaline or with a complete hyaline crossband between dark bands from stigma and over crossvein dm-cu........................................... 11</p> <p>11. Wing with transverse band from stigma as wide as stigma and band over crossvein dm-cu connected medially with subapical dark area that leaves a large apical hyaline patch (David et al., 2013: fig. 29) [linocierae group]....... E. thandikudi David</p> <p>- Wing with transverse band from stigma much narrower than stigma or absent and band over crossvein dm-cu isolated or connected anteriorly with a reduced subapical dark area absent from posterior part of cell r 4+5 and from cell m........... 12</p> <p>12 Wing with a single transverse dark band from stigma that does not reach posterior margin; if confined to cell r1 then crossvein r-m also infuscated; band over crossvein dm-cu connected anteriorly with a subapical dark area that does not reach vein M [cassiae group]...................................................................................... 13</p> <p>- Wing without a short transverse dark band from stigma; band over crossvein dm-cu isolated and not connected with subapical dark area........................................................................................... 14</p> <p>13. All femora yellow, wing predominantly hyaline, wing with transverse band from stigma reduced to cell r 1 only or narrowed to end at or before an infuscated crossvein r-m (Figs 14–15; David et al., 2013: fig. 65)................. E. cassiae (Munro)</p> <p>- Forefemur with apical one-third black, wing with transverse band from stigma reaching cell dm (David and Singh, 2015: fig. 15)....................................................................... E. pseudocassiae David &amp; Singh</p> <p>14. Face fulvous; apex of wing broadly dark brown without a hyaline apical spot; subapical band over crossvein dm-cu fading and merging with anterior yellow-fumose area (David et al., 2013: fig. 16) [chrysopila group]............... E. diffusa David</p> <p>- Face mostly black or brown or with a large black patch; apex of wing with a large apical hyaline spot or wing largely hyaline to subhyaline and not yellow-fumose [ungrouped species].................................................... 15</p> <p>15. Face fulvous with a large black patch near epistomal margin; wing with a broad and isolated infuscation over crossvein dm-cu, a complete subapical dark band and a broad hyaline apical spot in cell r 4+5 extending into cells r 2+3 and m (David and Singh, 2015: fig. 3)................................................................... E. wrightiae David &amp; Singh</p> <p>- Face mostly black or brown; wing with band over crossvein dm-cu faint and extending anteriorly to costa, apex broadly hyaline to subhyaline without a dark subapical band or distinct hyaline apical spot (David et al., 2013: fig. 23).......................................................................................... E. hyalipennis David &amp; Freidberg</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C477B405A7EE56BFF62FAC3FA15F93F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	David, K. J.;Hancock, D. L.;Sachin, K.;Mahendiran, G.	David, K. J., Hancock, D. L., Sachin, K., Mahendiran, G. (2021): A new species, new postabdominal descriptions and a new synonymy in Euphranta Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetinae: Adramini). Zootaxa 5057 (1): 87-98, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.5
0C477B405A7DE56DFF62F8F1FE6EF80B.text	0C477B405A7DE56DFF62F8F1FE6EF80B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euphranta flavothoracica David, Hancock & Sachin 2021	<div><p>Euphranta flavothoracica David, Hancock &amp; Sachin, sp. n.</p> <p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 001B70E4-4656-4E66-A59C-AB6C3CC1DB3F</p> <p>Description: Female: length of body, 4.29 mm (Fig. 1).</p> <p>Head: Frons fulvous with three frontal setae,1 orbital seta, 1 medial vertical and 1 lateral vertical seta present; occiput fulvous (Fig. 2); ocellar triangle black, without ocellar seta, postocellar seta present, postocular setae thin and black. Face fulvous without any markings, antenna fuscous, as long as face and with plumose arista, gena narrow with seta present.</p> <p>Thorax: Elongate (2.10 mm) and predominantly fulvous without any fuscous markings (Fig. 3). Chaetotaxy; 2 scapular setae, 1 postpronotal, 1 postsutural supra-alar, 1 intra-alar, 1 postalar, 1 dorsocentral, and 1 prescutellar acrostichal seta present.Scutellum yellow with 2pairs of scutellar setae, anepisternum, katepisternum and anepimeron fulvous with 3 anepisternal setae (1 medial and 2 posterior) and single katepisternal and anepimeral setae, anatergite fulvous with fine erect hairs, katatergite and subscutellum fulvous, haltere yellow (Fig. 1).</p> <p>Legs: Fore coxa fuscous, mid and hind coxae fulvous, all femora fulvous without any fuscous markings, forefemur with 3 ventral setae and 2–3 dorsal setae; all tibiae and tarsi fulvous. (Fig. 1).</p> <p>Wing: 3.81 mm long, hyaline basally and dark fuscous apically with hyaline indentations and spots (Fig. 5); pterostigma fuscous, subcostal band faint with a prominent dark fuscous spot on vein R 1 just below pterostigma; hyaline indentation in cell r 1 ends at vein R 4+5; hyaline indentation in cell cu 1 ends in cell dm; apex of cell r 4+5 hyaline; crossvein r-m placed beyond the middle of cell dm.</p> <p>Abdomen: 1.57 mm long, elongate oval, tergites 1–3 predominantly fulvous with small black markings on lateral margins of tergite 3; tergites 4–6 glossy black (Figs 1, 4).</p> <p>Postabdomen: Oviscape 1.35 mm long, conical, black, about as long as tergites 3–6 (Figs 1, 4); eversible membrane (0.83 mm long) with dentate spicules on distal end (Fig. 9), aculeus (0.63 mm long) pointed, with single preapical indentation and devoid of preapical setae (Fig. 8); 3 spermathecae, elongate-tubular (0.29 mm), wrinkled and translucent (Fig. 10).</p> <p>Type material: Holotype ♀, INDIA, Tamil Nadu, Dharmapuri, Vathalmalai, 13.x.2020, Mahendiran G. (NIM). The holotype is deposited in the National Insect Museum (ICAR- NBAIR), Bangalore, India.</p> <p>Etymology: The species name is derived from “flavus” (Latin “yellow”) and “thorax” denoting its fully yellowish thorax.</p> <p>Remarks: This species belongs in the zeylanica group, characterised by the presence of three anepisternal setae, 1 anterior to the phragma and 2 posterior to it (Hancock and Drew, 2004). It is similar to E. laosica Hardy in the wing pattern and abdominal markings, but can be differentiated by the pale scutum and yellow scutellum, the hyaline indentation in cell r 1 reaching vein R 4+5, the oviscape shorter than abdomen and the aculeus with a preapical indentation. In E. laosica (Figs 10–13) the scutum is fuscous posteriorly and the scutellum fuscous, the hyaline indentation in cell r 1 not reaching vein R 4+5, the oviscape 2–3 times longer than abdomen and the aculeus tip pointed without preapical indentation.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C477B405A7DE56DFF62F8F1FE6EF80B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	David, K. J.;Hancock, D. L.;Sachin, K.;Mahendiran, G.	David, K. J., Hancock, D. L., Sachin, K., Mahendiran, G. (2021): A new species, new postabdominal descriptions and a new synonymy in Euphranta Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetinae: Adramini). Zootaxa 5057 (1): 87-98, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.5
0C477B405A79E56FFF62FF3CFCADF9A1.text	0C477B405A79E56FFF62FF3CFCADF9A1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euphranta cassiae (Munro 1938)	<div><p>Euphranta cassiae (Munro)</p> <p>(Figures 14–23)</p> <p>Rhacochlaena cassiae Munro, 1938: 33: Type locality: Pusa, Bihar.</p> <p>Material examined: 2♀, INDIA: Maharashtra, Nagpur, NRCC, 18.ix.2009, David, K.J.; 1♀, INDIA, Karnataka, Bangalore, Attur, 03.x.2020, Sachin K.; 1♂, INDIA, Karnataka, Bangalore, G.K. V. K, 10.xii.2020, Maruthi K. V. (NIM).</p> <p>Diagnosis: External morphology and sexual dimorphism in wing pattern was adequately described by Munro (1938) except for male and female genitalia.</p> <p>Postabdomen. Male. Epandrium dome-shaped with elongate lateral surstylus (1.5 times longer than epandrium), with hyaline proctiger higher than epandrium. Medial surstylus shorter than lateral surstylus with well-developed prensisetae (Figs 16, 17). Phallus elongate, coiled (3.05 mm), glans highly sclerotized with well-developed acrophallus (Fig. 18). Female. Oviscape elongate (1.92 mm), dark brown/black (Fig. 19); eversible membrane (1.36 mm) shorter than oviscape with conical spicules on proximal and distal ends (Figs 21, 22); aculeus shorter than oviscape and eversible membrane (0.69 mm) with three preapical indentations and four pairs of preapical setae (Fig. 22). Spermathecae hyaline, elongate and tubular (Fig. 23).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C477B405A79E56FFF62FF3CFCADF9A1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	David, K. J.;Hancock, D. L.;Sachin, K.;Mahendiran, G.	David, K. J., Hancock, D. L., Sachin, K., Mahendiran, G. (2021): A new species, new postabdominal descriptions and a new synonymy in Euphranta Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetinae: Adramini). Zootaxa 5057 (1): 87-98, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.5
0C477B405A79E561FF62F91BFC15FB3B.text	0C477B405A79E561FF62F91BFC15FB3B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euphranta crux (Fabricius 1794)	<div><p>Euphranta crux (Fabricius)</p> <p>(Figures 24–33)</p> <p>Musca crux Fabricius, 1794: 358: Type locality: “ India orientali” [east India].</p> <p>Material examined: 4♂, 2♀, INDIA: Maharashtra, Nagpur, NRCC, 13.vii.2011, David, K.J.; 1♂, INDIA, Karnataka, Bangalore, Attur, 20.i.2018, Prabhu G.; 1♂, 1♀, INDIA, Karnataka, Bangalore, Attur, 06.vii.2018, Prahu G.; 2♂, INDIA, Karnataka, Bangalore, Attur, 19.vii.2018, Prabhu G.; 2♀, INDIA, Karnataka, Bangalore, Attur, 07.viii.2018, Prabhu G.; 1♂, 3♀, INDIA, Karnataka, Bangalore, Attur, 04.ix.2018, Prabhu, G. 1♀, INDIA, Karnataka, Bangalore, Attur, 11.x.2018, Nithya S.; 1♀, INDIA, Karnataka, Bangalore, Attur, 14.ix.2019, Sachin K.; 1♂, 1♀, INDIA, Karnataka, Bangalore, Attur, 23.x.2019, Maruthi K. V. (NIM).</p> <p>Diagnosis: Originally described by Fabricius (1794) from India, Bezzi (1913) redescribed and illustrated E. crux based on specimens collected from Calcutta except for postabdominal structures. The wing pattern is variable and E. dissoluta (Bezzi) and E. burtoni Hardy were synonymised by David et al. (2013).</p> <p>Postabdomen. Male. Epandrium dome-shaped with elongate lateral surstylus twice as long as epandrium and proctiger higher than epandrium. Medial surstylus shorter than lateral surstylus with well-developed prensisetae (Figs 26, 27). Phallus elongate (2.87 mm) with well-developed glans of phallus heavily sclerotized (Fig. 28).</p> <p>Female. Oviscape (Fig. 29) dark brown, elongate (2.05 mm); eversible membrane shorter than oviscape (1.70 mm) with conical spicules in proximal and distal ends of eversible membrane (Figs 30, 31); aculeus (0.60 mm) much shorter than eversible membrane; aculeus tip broad with a single preapical indentation and four pairs of preapical setae (Fig. 33); spermathecae hyaline and tubular (Fig. 32).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C477B405A79E561FF62F91BFC15FB3B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	David, K. J.;Hancock, D. L.;Sachin, K.;Mahendiran, G.	David, K. J., Hancock, D. L., Sachin, K., Mahendiran, G. (2021): A new species, new postabdominal descriptions and a new synonymy in Euphranta Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetinae: Adramini). Zootaxa 5057 (1): 87-98, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.5
0C477B405A77E561FF62FABEFD07F901.text	0C477B405A77E561FF62FABEFD07F901.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euphranta klugii (Wiedemann)	<div><p>Euphranta klugii (Wiedemann)</p> <p>(Figures 34–38)</p> <p>Dacus klugii Wiedemann, 1824: 56. Type locality: “ India orientali” [east India].</p> <p>Material examined: 2♂, INDIA: Karnataka, Kundapur, 09. viii.2002. (collector name not mentioned, host: Avicennia officinalis) (NIM).</p> <p>Diagnosis: This species was described by Wiedemann (1824) based on a female collected from India and its generic placement resolved by David et al. (2013), who illustrated the holotype. The wing pattern (Fig. 35) is characteristic.</p> <p>Postabdomen. Male. Epandrium dome-shaped, shorter than lateral surstylus, proctiger shorter than epandrium; medial surstylus shorter than lateral surstylus with well-developed prensisetae (Figs 36, 37). Phallus elongate (2.80 mm); glans of phallus with well sclerotized acrophallus and hammer-shaped subapical lobe (Fig. 38).</p> <p>Females were not available in this study.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C477B405A77E561FF62FABEFD07F901	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	David, K. J.;Hancock, D. L.;Sachin, K.;Mahendiran, G.	David, K. J., Hancock, D. L., Sachin, K., Mahendiran, G. (2021): A new species, new postabdominal descriptions and a new synonymy in Euphranta Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetinae: Adramini). Zootaxa 5057 (1): 87-98, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.5
