identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
D87087C1D460FFF9A492FAC5FBC1E82B.text	D87087C1D460FFF9A492FAC5FBC1E82B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Zelus renardii Kolenati 1856	<div><p>Zelus renardii Kolenati, 1856 —Leafhopper Assassin Bug</p> <p>(Fig. 1)</p> <p>Distribution in Turkey (Map 1): Amasya, Ankara, Diyarbakır, İstanbul, İzmir (Çerçi &amp; Koçak 2016; Kıyak 2020; Dursun &amp; Fent 2020; Çelik et al. 2021); Antalya, Aydın, Balıkesir, Bursa, Çanakkale, Denizli, Eskişehir, Manisa, Muğla, Yalova (this study).</p> <p>New records by citizen scientists in Turkey: 1. Ankara: Çankaya, 27.IX.2020 (Akkoç 2020); 2. Çankaya, 11.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 3. Çankaya, 15.IV.2021 (GBIF.org 2021); 4. Çankaya, 20.VII.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 5. Keçiören, 21.VII.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 6. Yenimahalle, Susuz, 29.VII.2020 (Adsız, 2020). 7. Antalya: Alanya, 24.XI.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 8. Alanya, 14.VII.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 9. Gazipaşa, 24.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 10. Kemer (centre), 7.X.2019 (Mazdaexclusive1, 2019); 11. Kemer, Göynük, 7.IX.2019 (Leoshko 2019). 12. Aydın: Koçarlı, 3.XI.2018 (Oral 2018); 13. Kuşadası, 22.V.2016 (Yurdakul 2016a). 14. Balıkesir: Bandırma, İhsaniye, 12.XI.2020 (Yırgal 2020); 15. Burhaniye, 2.IX.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 16. Edremit, 15.VII.2018 (GBIF.org 2021); 17. Edremit, road to Ayvacık, 28.VI.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 18. Edremit, Güre Mah., road to Çanakkale, 6.X.2018 (Sisco, 2018); 19. Marmara, Avşa Island, 14.VIII.2019 (Ağar 2019). 20. Bursa: İznik, 6.X.2018, 18.VII.2020 (Sancar 2018a; 2020); 21. Nilüfer, 4.VIII.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 22. ibid., 28.VIII.2018 (Biçici 2018a); 23. Nilüfer, Görükle Zafer, Başköy, 1.X.2020 (Telli 2020); 24. Çanakkale: Ayvacık, 29.VI.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 25. Ayvacık, Küçükkuyu, 23.IV.2019 (Tosun 2019). 26. Denizli: Pamukkale, 25.V.2019 (Msarsay 2019); 27. Sarayköy, Karakıran, 24.V.2020 (GBIF.org 2021). 28. Eskişehir (centre), 31.III.2021 (GBIF.org 2021). 29. İstanbul, 26.II.2021 (Orkun 2021); 30. Adalar, 19.IX.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 31. Adalar, Heybeliada, 24.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 32. Beşiktaş, Abbasağa, 14.VIII.2020 (Mollman, 2020); 33. Kadıköy, Caddebostan, 2.X.2020 (Kurt 2020); 34. Kartal, 20.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 35. Pendik, 19.VIII.2020 (Yeşilyurt 2020); 36. Şile, 16.I.2021 (Sipahioğlu 2021); 37. Ümraniye, Tatlısu, 2.VIII.2019 (Ercin 2019b); 39. Üsküdar, 29.X.2020 (Aluvd 2020); 38. Üsküdar, Bulgurlu, 18.X.2020 (GBIF. org 2021). 40. İzmir Karşıyaka, 2.X.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 41-42. Bornova, 01.X.2015, 06.III.2016 (Yurdakul 2015; 2016b); 43-44. cf. Çeşme, 30. X. 2020, 31.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 45. Menemen, 3.II.2019 (Gül 2019); 46. Narlıdere, 31.VIII.2019 (Dere 2019); 47. Selçuk, İsabey, 10.XII.2020 (Oruz 2020a); 48. Tire, 16.VII.2020 (Oruz 2020b); 49. Urla, 28.VII.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 50. ibid., 03.VIII.2019 (Sarıoğuz 2019). 51. Manisa (centre), 13.XI.2019: (R36a1 2019); 52. ibid., 5.XII.2020 (Lovi 2020); 53. Şehzadeler, Sancaklıbozköy, 29.X.2020 (Koyuncu 2020). 54. Muğla: Bodrum, Bitez, 10.V.2020 (Carlisle 2020a); 55-59. Bodrum, Gümbet, 29.XI.2019, 10.V.2020, 31.V.2020, 05.VI.2020, 14.VIII.2020 (Carlisle 2020b –f); 60. Bodrum, 4.VIII.2019 (Maracalewaert 2019); 61. Bodrum, Turgutreis, 13.I.2021 (Şişman 2021); 62. Datça, 24.VIII.2020 (Parlak 2020); 63. Fethiye, Keçiler, 21.X.2020 (Efe 2020); 64. Marmaris, 19.IV.2021 (GBIF.org 2021); 65. Marmaris, Adaköy, 6.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 66. Marmaris, Çamlı, 21.XI.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 67-69. Milas, 20.VII.2016, 04.VI.2017, 14.IX.2018 (Özek 2016; 2017; 2018); 70. Ortaca, Sarıgerme, 13.II.2021 (Dlmerme 2021); 71. Ula, Akyaka, 17.X.2020 (GBIF. org 2021); 72. Yalova (centre), 22.X.2018 (Uğur 2018); 73. ibid., 28.I.2018 (Sancar 2018b).</p> <p>Comments: Z. renardii is a Nearctic species and its native distribution is in North America (Zhang et al. 2016). It was introduced to Albania, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Portugal, Spain (Davranoglou 2011; Vivas 2012; Dioli 2013; Çerçi &amp; Koçak 2016; van der Heyden 2017, 2018; Garrouste 2019; van der Heyden &amp; Grosso-Silva 2020). Isolated records from Denmark, Germany and United Kingdom do not currently prove stable colonisation in these regions (van der Heyden 2021). The first record of Z. renardii from Turkey was given from İzmir in 2015 and İstanbul in 2016 (Çerçi &amp; Koçak 2016). With the new records presented above, this species is known from 15 provinces in Turkey (Map 1). According to the new records given here, Z. renardii is active all year round in Turkey. However, it was mostly seen in October, with 19 of 73 records (Graph 1).</p> <p>GRAPH 1. Seasonality of Zelus renardii Kolenati, 1856, based on records from Turkey.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D87087C1D460FFF9A492FAC5FBC1E82B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Çerçi, Bariş;Karataş, Ahmet;Karataş, Ayşegül	Çerçi, Bariş, Karataş, Ahmet, Karataş, Ayşegül (2021): Insecta non gratae: New Distribution Records of Eight Alien Bug (Hemiptera) Species in Turkey with Contributions of Citizen Science. Zootaxa 5057 (1): 1-28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.1
D87087C1D462FFFFA492F97CFBEAEDC8.text	D87087C1D462FFFFA492F97CFBEAEDC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Corythucha arcuata (Say 1832)	<div><p>Corythucha arcuata (Say, 1832) —Oak Lace Bug</p> <p>(Fig. 2)</p> <p>Distribution in Turkey (Map 2): Amasya, Ankara, Artvin, Bilecik, Bolu, Bursa, Çankırı, Düzce, Edirne, Eskişehir, İstanbul, Kastamonu, Kocaeli, Mersin, Niğde, Sakarya, Samsun, Tekirdağ, Tokat, Zonguldak (Mutun 2003; Mutun et al. 2009; Aytar et al. 2014; Küçükbasmacı 2014; Çerçi &amp; Koçak 2016; Dursun &amp; Fent 2017; Aysal &amp; Kıvan 2018; M. Fent pers. comm.); Kırklareli, Trabzon (this study).</p> <p>New records by citizen scientists in Turkey: 1. Bursa: İznik, 25.VIII.2015, 4.IX.2015, 18.IX.2015 (Sancar 2015a –c); 2. Nilüfer, Ürünlü, 27.IX.2016 (Biçici 2016a); 3. Eskişehir: (centre), 10.V.2021 (Suna 2021a). 4.</p> <p>İstanbul: Başakşehir, 17.IX.2015 (Uçar 2015); 5. Esenyurt, 11.VIII.2014, 23.VII.2016 (Çerçi 2014a; 2016); 6. Pendik, 28.VIII.2020 (Yıldız 2020); 7. Sancaktepe, 30.VIII.2019, 27.XI.2019 (Coşkun 2019a,b); 8. Sancaktepe, 1.V.2020 (Coşkun 2020a); 9. Sultangazi, 2.IX.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 10. Ümraniye, Tatlısu, 08.VIII.2019 (Ercin 2019a). 11. Kırklareli (centre), 20.V.2020 (Akıncıoğlu 2020). 12. Samsun: Atakum, 19 Mayıs Üniv. Kampüsü, 11.XI.2019 (Gökalp 2019). 13. Trabzon: Ortahisar, Ayvalı, 29.VII.2015 (Aslan 2015).</p> <p>Comments: C. arcuata is a North American species (Rabitsch 2008). Its first record for Europe was given from Italy in 2000 (Bernardinelli &amp; Zandigiacomo 2000). The bug later spread to many other European countries including Albania, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, France, Hungary, Croatia, Greece, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, Slovakia, Switzerland, Ukraine, and also Iran (Forster et al. 2005; Ghahari et al. 2010; Csóka et al. 2019). The first record in Turkey was given from Bolu Province in 2002 (Mutun, 2003). The bug, called “meşe kaplanı” in Turkish, spread to almost all the neighbouring provinces in a few years (Mutun et al. 2009). It reached Kastamonu in 2013 (Küçükbasmacı 2014), Central Black Sea and Mediterranean regions of Turkey in 2014 (Aytar et al. 2014). According to 17 new records from 13 localities, the activity period of C. arcuata ranges from May to November and it has been seen in August and September with a maximum of five records each (Graph 2).</p> <p>GRAPH 2. Seasonality of Corythucha arcuata (Say, 1832), based on records from Turkey.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D87087C1D462FFFFA492F97CFBEAEDC8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Çerçi, Bariş;Karataş, Ahmet;Karataş, Ayşegül	Çerçi, Bariş, Karataş, Ahmet, Karataş, Ayşegül (2021): Insecta non gratae: New Distribution Records of Eight Alien Bug (Hemiptera) Species in Turkey with Contributions of Citizen Science. Zootaxa 5057 (1): 1-28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.1
D87087C1D464FFFCA492FB9DFBF9E99E.text	D87087C1D464FFFCA492FB9DFBF9E99E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Corythucha ciliata (Say 1832)	<div><p>Corythucha ciliata (Say, 1832) —Sycamore Lace Bug</p> <p>(Fig. 3)</p> <p>Distribution in Turkey (Map 3): Bolu, Kastamonu, Tekirdağ, Trabzon (Mutun 2009; Aysal &amp; Kıvan 2011; Sevim et al. 2013; Kezik &amp; Eroğlu 2014; Küçükbasmacı 2014; Küçükbasmacı et al. 2016; Dursun &amp; Fent 2017; Aysal &amp; Kıvan 2018); Bursa, Samsun (this study).</p> <p>New records by citizen scientists in Turkey: 1. Bursa: Sapanca, 12.VIII.2014 (Çerçi 2014b). 2. Samsun: Ondokuzmayıs, 24.VII.2018 (Karataş 2018a).</p> <p>Comments: The species C. ciliata is called “sycamore lace bug”, since this oligophagous insect specialized especially on sycamores (Platanus spp.). It is originally a Nearctic species and it was reported in Italy (Padova) in 1964 for the first time in Europe (Rabitsch 2008; Mutun 2009). It rapidly expanded its range of distribution in many countries of Europe (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, France (incl. Corsica), SW Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Hungary, Italy (incl. Sicily), Madeira, Moldavia, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, south of Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland), Central and Eastern Asia (China (CE NO SW), Japan, Korea, Uzbekistan) and Australia (Aukema 2021). It was first discovered in Turkey by Mutun (2009) in Bolu in 2007. The invasive bug, named as “çınar kaplanı” or “çınar dantel böceği” in Turkish, has been seen in two provinces in Marmara and four in the Black Sea (Mutun 2009; Aysal &amp; Kıvan 2011; Sevim et al. 2013; Kezik &amp; Eroğlu 2014; Küçükbasmacı 2014; Küçükbasmacı et al. 2016; Dursun &amp; Fent 2017; Aysal &amp; Kıvan 2018). Of the two records obtained by the authors, the one from Bursa was in July and the one from Samsun was in August (Graph 3).</p> <p>GRAPH 3. Seasonality of Corythucha ciliata (Say, 1832), based on records from Turkey.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D87087C1D464FFFCA492FB9DFBF9E99E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Çerçi, Bariş;Karataş, Ahmet;Karataş, Ayşegül	Çerçi, Bariş, Karataş, Ahmet, Karataş, Ayşegül (2021): Insecta non gratae: New Distribution Records of Eight Alien Bug (Hemiptera) Species in Turkey with Contributions of Citizen Science. Zootaxa 5057 (1): 1-28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.1
D87087C1D466FFF3A492FF66FB13EDD5.text	D87087C1D466FFF3A492FF66FB13EDD5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Leptoglossus occidentalis (Heidemann 1910)	<div><p>Leptoglossus occidentalis (Heidemann, 1910) —Western Conifer Seed Bug</p> <p>(Fig. 4)</p> <p>Distribution in Turkey (Map 4): Adana, Afyonkarahisar, Amasya, Ankara, Ardahan, Artvin, Balıkesir, Bilecik, Burdur, Bursa, Edirne, Elazığ, Erzurum, Isparta, İstanbul, İzmir, Kastamonu, Kırklareli, Muğla, Yalova (Arslangündoğdu &amp; Hızal 2010; Fent &amp; Kment 2011; Hızal &amp; İnan 2012; Yıldırım et al. 2013; Çerçi &amp; Koçak 2016; Dursun 2016; Özek &amp; Avcı 2017; Parlak 2017; Aksu 2018; Oğuzoğlu &amp; Avcı 2018; Selek 2018; Özgen et al. 2017; İpekdal et al. 2019; Zengin &amp; Dursun 2019; Oğuzoğlu &amp; Avcı 2020); Antalya, Bartın, Bolu, Çorum, Denizli, Düzce, Eskişehir, Giresun, Karabük, Kayseri, Kütahya, Ordu, Osmaniye, Sakarya, Samsun, Tokat, Sinop, Tekirdağ, Uşak, Zonguldak (this study).</p> <p>New records by citizen scientists in Turkey: 1. Afyonkarahisar (centre): Sahipata, 12.VIII.2020 (GBIF.org 2021). 2. Ankara: Çamlıdere, Şahinler Nature Park, 24.X.2020 (Zengin 2020); 3. Çankaya, 28.IX.2017 (Yetgin 2017); 4. Çankaya, 17.X.2020 (Dilek 2020); 5. Çankaya, 24.IX.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 6. Çankaya, Aziziye, 9.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 7. Çankaya, Dikmen Vadisi, 28.VIII.2019 (Usta 2019); 8. Çankaya, İncek, near Prestij, 4.IX.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 9. Çankaya, Ümitköy, 14.X.2018 (Deniz 2018); 10. Etimesgut, Yavuz Selim, 30.VIII.2020 (Çimen 2020a); 11. Gölbaşı, 11.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 12. Gölbaşı, İncek, 8.III.2021 (Güler 2021); 13. Gölbaşı, Yavuz Sultan Selim, 20.IV.2021 (Kipritoğlu 2021); 14. Kızılcahamam, Karacaören, 25.X.2020 (GBIF. org 2021); 15. Yaşamkent, Yenimahalle, 3.I.2021 (Köseoğlu 2021); 16. Yenimahalle, 4.X.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 17. Yenimahalle, Mutlukent, 24.IX.2020 (Aversano 2020). 18. Antalya: Alanya, 25.II.2021 (GBIF.org 2021); 19. Manavgat, 12.VI.2014 (Şahin 2014); 20. Serik, Belek, 8.X.2020 (Klimchak 2020). 21. Balıkesir: cf. “Sındırgı”, 8.X.2018 (GBIF.org 2021). 22. Bartın (centre), 22.X.2020 (Amaç 2020a). 23. Bolu: Mudurnu, Taşkesti, 27.XI.2020 (Nihan 2020). 24. Bursa: Gemlik, 20.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 25. İznik, 4.X.2015 (Sancar 2015d); 26. Nilüfer, Ürünlü, 30.XI.2017, 23.X.2018 (Biçici 2017; 2018b); 27. Osmangazi, 29.IX.2018 (Biçici 2018c); 28. Yıldırım, 22.X.2015 (Yıldırım 2015). 29. Çorum (centre), 15.VIII.2015 (Deniz 2015); 30. ibid., 13.VII.2018 (Çimen 2018). 31. Denizli: Merkezefendi, 29.XI.2020 (Karaca 2020a); 32. ibid., 25.X.2020 (Özcan 2020); 33. Pamukkale, 13.X.2020 (Karaca 2020b). 34. Düzce (centre), 12.X.2018 (Öztürk 2018). 35. Eskişehir (centre): Çankaya, 11.XI.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 36. Muttalip Quarter, 14.X.2018 (GBIF.org 2021); 37. Odunpazarı, 23.IX.2018 (GBIF. org 2021); 38. Odunpazarı Cemetery, 8.IV.2021 (Suna 2021b). 39. Giresun: Espiye, 8.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021). 40.</p> <p>İstanbul: Kartal, 5.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 41. Ataşehir, Barbaros, 1.X.2020 (Ovich 2020); 42. Sarıyer, 27.X.2020 (Ozgurek 2020); 43. Bakırköy, 29.X.2019 (Arakaky 2019); 44. Bakırköy, Kartaltepe, 25.V.2020 (Sxhmxt 2020); 45. Başakşehir, 10.X.2015 (Uçar 2015b); 46. Esenyurt, 25.I.2015 (Çerçi 2015); 47. Kadıköy, 2.X.2019 (Burnaz 2019); 48. Kadıköy, 28.X.2018 (Sipahioğlu 2018); 49. Kadıköy, Bostancı, 10.XI.202 (Öztürk 2020); 50. Maltepe, Altayçeşme, 28.IX.2019 (Birol 2019); 51. Kartal, 25.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 52. Pendik, Yenişehir, 23.X.2020 (Caferoğlu 2020); 53. Sancaktepe, Çekmeköy, 4.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 54. Sarıyer, 4.II.2021 (GBIF.org 2021); 55. Sarıyer, Hacıosman, 3.II.2021: (Doğa 2021); 56. Sarıyer, Bahçeköy, 29.XI.2020 (Alkan 2020); 57. Sarıyer, road to Koç University, 4.IX.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 58. Silivri, 13.VIII.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 59. Ümraniye, 9.XI.2020 (GBIF.org 2021). 60. İzmir: Selçuk, 23.X.2020 (Oruz 2020c); 61. Urla, 19.VII.2018, 18.X.2020 (Çerçi 2018; GBIF.org 2021). 62. Karabük (centre), 10.X.2020 (Oral 2020); 63. Safranbolu, 29.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021). 64. Kastamonu (centre), 6.XI.2018 (Edebiibey 2018); 65. Araç, 9.XI.2014, 8.I.2016 (Tosun 2015; 2016a). 66.</p> <p>Kayseri: Yahyalı, 19.XI.2014, 23.XI.2015, 23.X.2018 (Şahin 2014; 2015; 2018). 67. Kütahya (centre), 17.X.2020 (Onur 2020); 68. Tavşanlı, 17.X.2018 (GBIF.org 2021). 69. Muğla: Menteşe, 9.V.2021 (Dmkurysh 2021). 70. Ordu (centre), 11.XI.2020 (Şenocak 2020). 71. Osmaniye (centre), 1.XI.2020 (Arıkan 2020). 72. Sakarya: Adapazarı, Taşkısığı, 22.X.2019 (Efe 2019). 73. Samsun: Atakum, Kurupelit, 01.X.2014, 03.III.2018 (Eren 2014; 2018); 74. İlkadım, 24.X.2020 (Coşkun 2020b); 75. İlkadım, Bahçelievler, 21.X.2020 (Kaan 2020). 76. Sinop (centre): Ada, 6.X.2020 (Coşkun 2020c). 77. Tekirdağ: Süleymanpaşa, 21.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021). 78. Tokat (centre), 12.I.2015 (Tilki 2015). 79. Uşak (centre), 26.X.2020 (AA 2020). 80. Yalova: Armutlu, 19.XI.2010 (Verün 2018). 81. Zonguldak: Çaycuma, 27.III.2016 (Yangın 2016a).</p> <p>Comments: Native distribution of L. occidentalis is in North America (Rabitsch 2008). Its first European record was given in Italy in 1999. The distribution of this bug rapidly expanded to eastern and western Europe from Italy and now it is very common and widespread throughout the continent, and known from Albania, Algeria, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, China, Croatia, Crete, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Finland, Georgia, Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, Moldavia, Montenegro, Morocco, Netherlands, Norway, Palestine, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, and Ukraine, as well as Central and South America and South Africa (Arslangündoğdu &amp; Hızal 2010; Fent &amp; Kment 2011; Aukema 2021). It reached Turkey a decade later following its first record in Europe and reported from the European side of İstanbul province in 2009 (Arslangündoğdu &amp; Hızal 2010). It was observed from Edirne (Fent &amp; Kment 2011) and Yalova (this study) in the same year. It spread toward southwestern Turkey over Balıkesir in 2011 (Dursun 2016) and İzmir in 2012 (Hızal &amp; İnan 2012) and arrived to Antalya in 2014 (this study). According to new data, it was also seen in Samsun in 2014, in Çorum and Tokat in 2015. Its occurrence in the surrounding provinces in the following years is probably due to the lack of observation. According to 89 records given from 81 localities in the present study, it is seen all year except December. With 43 records, almost half of the total was obtained in October (Graph 4).</p> <p>GRAPH 4. Seasonality of Leptoglossus occidentalis (Heidemann, 1910), based on records from Turkey.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D87087C1D466FFF3A492FF66FB13EDD5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Çerçi, Bariş;Karataş, Ahmet;Karataş, Ayşegül	Çerçi, Bariş, Karataş, Ahmet, Karataş, Ayşegül (2021): Insecta non gratae: New Distribution Records of Eight Alien Bug (Hemiptera) Species in Turkey with Contributions of Citizen Science. Zootaxa 5057 (1): 1-28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.1
D87087C1D468FFF0A492FBD0FC98EF92.text	D87087C1D468FFF0A492FBD0FC98EF92.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Perillus bioculatus (Fabricius 1775)	<div><p>Perillus bioculatus (Fabricius, 1775) —Two-spotted Stink Bug</p> <p>(Fig. 5)</p> <p>Distribution in Turkey (Map 5): Amasya, Ankara, Edirne, Kırklareli, Tekirdağ (Kıvan 2004; Fent &amp; Aktaç 2007; Dursun &amp; Fent 2018; Kıyak et al. 2019); Bolu, Kastamonu, Zonguldak (this study).</p> <p>New records by citizen scientists in Turkey: 1. Amasya: Merzifon, 25.VII.2017 (Şeker 2017). 2. Bolu: road to Avdan Village, 16.XI.2020 (Okur, 2020). 3. Kastamonu (centre), 14.VI.2016 (Yaşayacak 2016). 4. Zonguldak (centre), 14.X.2019 (Aşar 2019).</p> <p>Comments: P. bioculatus is originally a Nearctic species (Rabitsch 2008) and it was introduced to Algeria, Greece, Serbia and Turkey in Europe (Aukema 2021). This alien insect was firstly reported from Tekirdağ in 1997 (Kıvan 2004). However, the oldest material in Turkey was collected in Edirne in 1993 (Fent &amp; Aktaç 2007). Later, its distribution range expanded in the West and Central Black Sea and also Ankara in Central Anatolia (Dursun &amp; Fent 2018; Kıyak et al. 2019; this study). Probably it may appear in the provinces in between these regions. Therefore, additional observations are needed. Two of the new records were obtained in mid-summer (June, July) and the other two in autumn (October, November) (Graph 5).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D87087C1D468FFF0A492FBD0FC98EF92	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Çerçi, Bariş;Karataş, Ahmet;Karataş, Ayşegül	Çerçi, Bariş, Karataş, Ahmet, Karataş, Ayşegül (2021): Insecta non gratae: New Distribution Records of Eight Alien Bug (Hemiptera) Species in Turkey with Contributions of Citizen Science. Zootaxa 5057 (1): 1-28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.1
D87087C1D46AFFF6A492FF2FFB44E87C.text	D87087C1D46AFFF6A492FF2FFB44E87C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Halyomorpha halys (Stal 1855)	<div><p>Halyomorpha halys (Stål, 1855) —Brown Marmorated Stink Bug</p> <p>(Fig. 6)</p> <p>Distribution in Turkey (Map 6): Artvin, Giresun, İstanbul, İzmir, Ordu, Rize, Samsun, Trabzon, Yalova (Çerçi &amp; Koçak 2017; Güncan &amp; Gümüş 2019; Ak et al. 2019; Cianferoni et al. 2019, Göktürk &amp; Tozlu 2019, Çerçi 2021; Özdemir &amp; Tuncer 2021); Ankara, Aydın, Bartın, Bursa, Eskişehir (this study).</p> <p>New records by citizen scientists in Turkey: 1. Ankara: Çankaya, 23.XI.2020 (GBIF.org 2021). 2. Artvin: Borçka, 28.VII.2019 (Bacak, 2019a). 3. Aydın: Kuşadası, 03.X.2020 (Oruz, 2020d). 4. Bartın (centre), 22.X.2020 (Amaç, 2020b). 5. Bursa: Nilüfer, 29.IX.2018 (Biçici, 2018d); 6. Nilüfer, 27.VII.2019 (GBIF.org 2021). 7. Eskişehir, 10.VIII.2020 (GBIF.org 2021). 8. İstanbul: Adalar, 19.IX.2019 (Kernane 2019); 9. Ataşehir, 3.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 10. Beşiktaş, 1.VI.2019 (Grommen 2019a); 11. Beşiktaş, 27.X.2020 (Kılıç 2020); 12. Beyoğlu, 12.VIII.2019 (Grommen 2019b); 13. Fatih, 29.VIII.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 14. Kadıköy, 05.X.2019 (Çelebi 2019); 15. Kadıköy, 13.XI.2019 (Uludağ 2019); 16. Kadıköy, 29.X.2020 (Sipahioğlu 2020); 17. Kadıköy, 30.VIII.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 18. Kadıköy, Caferağa, 23.IX.2018 (GBIF.org 2021); 19. Kartal, 24.IX.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 20. Küçükçekmece, 7.X.2020 (Usta 2020); 21. Kadıköy, Maltepe, 10.VIII.2020 (Coşkun, 2020e); 22. Sarıyer, 24.II.2021 (GBIF.org 2021); 23. Sarıyer, 20.VIII.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 24. Sarıyer, 6.X.2020 (Evans 2020); 25. Üsküdar, 19.X.2019 (Öztürk 2019); 26. Üsküdar, Altunizade, 27.I.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 27. Üsküdar, Küçük Çamlıca, 9.IV.2021 (Wak 2021). 28. İzmir (Konak), 7.IX.2020 (GBIF.org 2021); 29. Konak, 27.X.2020 (GBIF.org 2021). 30. Rize: Derepazarı, Tersane, 27.VII.2020 (Karataş 2020). 31. Trabzon (centre), 04.X.2019 (GBIF.org 2021).</p> <p>Comments: H. halys is native in East Asia and ranges in China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan (Rabitsch 2008). It is found firstly in North America and Chile as an invasive insect species. This bug was introduced to Europe in 2004 for the first time and spread to many European countries including Austria, Croatia, Germany, France, Hungary, Italy, Liechtenstein, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Switzerland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden (Cianferoni et al. 2018). It was recorded from Greece in 2011, from Georgia in 2015 and from Bulgaria in 2016 (Cianferoni et al. 2018; Özdemir &amp; Tuncer 2021; Çerçi 2021). Following these records from neighbouring countries, it arrived in Turkey and it was firstly discovered in İstanbul in 2017 (Çerçi &amp; Koçak 2017). According to the records given later, the oldest record in Turkey is from Artvin in 2016 (Göktürk &amp; Tozlu 2019). It seems, from these records, that this species spread to Turkey both from Georgia through Artvin and from Europe through İstanbul. According to new data, H. halys can be found year-round, but it is most common in autumn. Eleven of the 31 records were reported in October (Graph 6).</p> <p>GRAPH 6. Seasonality of Halyomorpha halys (Stål, 1855), based on records from Turkey.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D87087C1D46AFFF6A492FF2FFB44E87C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Çerçi, Bariş;Karataş, Ahmet;Karataş, Ayşegül	Çerçi, Bariş, Karataş, Ahmet, Karataş, Ayşegül (2021): Insecta non gratae: New Distribution Records of Eight Alien Bug (Hemiptera) Species in Turkey with Contributions of Citizen Science. Zootaxa 5057 (1): 1-28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.1
D87087C1D46DFFF4A492F8F1FB7BEADA.text	D87087C1D46DFFF4A492F8F1FB7BEADA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stictocephala bisonia Kopp et Yonke 1977	<div><p>Stictocephala bisonia Kopp et Yonke, 1977 —Buffalo Treehopper</p> <p>(Fig. 7)</p> <p>Distribution in Turkey (Map 7): Ankara, Artvin, Balıkesir, Edirne, Kırklareli, Rize (Lodos &amp; Kalkandelen 1981); Bolu, Bursa, Eskişehir, Giresun, İstanbul, Sakarya, Tokat, Zonguldak (this study).</p> <p>New records by citizen scientists in Turkey: 1. Bolu: Mudurnu, Karamurat, 10.X.2015 (Karacan 2015). 2. Bursa: Nilüfer, Ürünlü, 27.VI.2016 (Biçici 2016b). 3. Eskişehir, 23.VIII.2020 (GBIF.org 2021). 4. Giresun: Bulancak, Samugüney, 31.VIII.2017 (Karataş 2017). 5. İstanbul: Sarıyer, Bahçeköy, 4.IX.2019 (Güngör 2019a); 6. Ümraniye, 20.IX.2015 (Tosun 2016b). 7. Rize: Derepazarı, Tersane, 27.VII.2020: Ahmet Karataş. 8. Sakarya: Karasu, 08.IX.2015 (Eren G. 2015), ibid., 20.IX.2015 (Eren F. 2015), ibid., 07.VIII.2016 (Eren A. 2016). 9. Tokat (centre): Kömeç, 09.VIII.2017 (Uçar 2017). 10. Zonguldak: Alaplı, 09.IX.2014 (Yaşayacak 2015).</p> <p>Comments: S. bisonia is native to the central and eastern part of North America (Walczak et al. 2018). It was classified formerly as Ceresa bubalus (Fabricius, 1794) (Walczak et al. 2018). However, Andrade (1997) regarded it as a synonym of Stictocephala alta (Walker, 1851). This alien species was transported to eastern central Europe from North America and it was found for the first time in Serbia before 1912 (Walczak et al. 2018). It spread in most of the countries from Portugal to Azerbaijan in the Western Palearctic. As in North America, it is distributed just north of 50 o N latitude in Europe (Schedl 1991; Walczak et al. 2018). This insect was reported from Edirne in 1963 as Ceresa bubalus by Lodos &amp; Kalkandelen (1981). Although it is the oldest introduced species among the eight bug species considered in the present study; the number of provinces in which it was reported is low, as there is not much work on it or alternatively, its spreading speed may be low in Turkey. It is mostly seen in Marmara and Eastern Black Sea provinces. There are 13 records from 11 localities (Map 7). Most of them were in autumn, with five records each in September and October (Graph 7).</p> <p>GRAPH 7. Seasonality of Stictocephala bisonia Kopp et Yonke, 1977, based on records from Turkey.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D87087C1D46DFFF4A492F8F1FB7BEADA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Çerçi, Bariş;Karataş, Ahmet;Karataş, Ayşegül	Çerçi, Bariş, Karataş, Ahmet, Karataş, Ayşegül (2021): Insecta non gratae: New Distribution Records of Eight Alien Bug (Hemiptera) Species in Turkey with Contributions of Citizen Science. Zootaxa 5057 (1): 1-28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.1
D87087C1D46FFFEAA492FAE2FC04EBB6.text	D87087C1D46FFFEAA492FAE2FC04EBB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Metcalfa pruinosa (Say 1830)	<div><p>Metcalfa pruinosa (Say, 1830) —Citrus Flatid Planthopper</p> <p>(Fig. 8)</p> <p>Distribution in Turkey (Map 8): Bartın, Düzce, Edirne, İzmir, Kırklareli, Ordu, Sakarya, Samsun, Yalova (Karsavuran &amp; Güçlü 2004; Güncan 2014; Hantaş et al. 2014; Dursun &amp; Fent 2016; Demir 2018; Yıldız et al. 2018; Tuncer et al. 2020); Bursa, Giresun, İstanbul, Sinop, Zonguldak (this study).</p> <p>New records by citizen scientists in Turkey: 1. Bursa: Nilüfer, Ürünlü, 29.VII.2016, 17.IX.2018 (Biçici 2016c; 2018e); 2. Giresun: Bulancak, Samugüney Village, 28.VII.2020, 01.VIII.2020: Ahmet Karataş. 3. İstanbul, 18.VIII.2019 (GBIF.org 2021); 4. Beykoz, 26.VIII.2016 (Koçak 2016); 5. Sarıyer, Bahçeköy, 28.VIII.2019 (Güngör 2019b); 6. Sarıyer, Emirgan, 18.VIII.2018 (GBIF.org 2021); 7. Sarıyer, Yeniköy, 27.VI.2006 (Dağ 2018); 8.</p> <p>Sakarya: Karasu, 13.VII.2016, 26.VIII.2016 (Eren F. 2016a–b); ibid., 09.VIII.2016 (Eren G. 2016). 9. Samsun: Ondokuzmayıs, Yörükler, 24.VII.2018 (Karataş 2018b). 10. Sinop (centre), 9.IX.2020 (Coşkun 2020d). 11. Yalova (centre): Kadıköy, 18.VIII.2019 (Bacak 2019b). 12. Zonguldak (centre), 07.VII.2016 (Aşar 2016); 13. Çaycuma, Burunkaya, 08.VIII.2016 (Yangın 2016b).</p> <p>Comments: Native distribution of M. pruinosa is in the Nearctic region (Zangheri &amp; Donadini 1980; CABI 2019). This invasive bug was accidentally introduced from North America to Italy in 1979 (Zangheri &amp; Donadini 1980). It has now been detected in 19 European countries (CABI 2019). The species was firstly recorded from İzmir in 2003 (Karsavuran &amp; Güçlü 2004). It was photographed three years later in 2006 by Saim Dağ from İstanbul (Dağ 2018). In the following years, it was seen in the Marmara Region and the Black Sea coastal provinces up to Giresun in the east (Map 8). Eighteen records were obtained from 14 localities (Graph 8). Accordingly, it was mostly seen in August (n= 9).</p> <p>A total of eight hemipteran species were reported from 50 provinces of Turkey. The most common species was Leptoglossus occidentalis reported from 40 provinces. The number of provinces where other species were observed is as follows: Corythucha arcuata (21), Zelus renardii (15), Metcalfa pruinosa (14), Halyomorpha halys (14), Stictocephala bisonia (13), Perillus bioculatus (8), and Corythucha ciliata (6).</p> <p>The highest diversity of species was in Bursa province where all species except Perillus bioculatus were found. Ankara and İstanbul share second place with six species. There were five provinces with five species (Bolu, Eskisehir, Kırklareli, Samsun, Zonguldak), nine provinces with four species (Amasya, Artvin, Edirne, Giresun, İzmir, Kastamonu, Sakarya, Tekirdağ, Yalova), five provinces with three species (Balıkesir, Bartın, Düzce, Ordu, Trabzon), eight provinces with two species (Antalya, Aydın, Bilecik, Denizli, Muğla, Rize, Sinop, Tokat) and 20 provinces with one species (Adana, Afyonkarahisar, Ardahan, Burdur, Çanakkale, Çankırı, Çorum, Diyarbakır, Elazığ, Erzurum, Isparta, Karabük, Kayseri, Kocaeli, Kütahya, Manisa, Mersin, Niğde, Osmaniye, Uşak) (Tab. 1).</p> <p>When records in Table 1 are examined, the number of provincial records is 131, 77 of which are presented in the previous literature. A total of 80 provincial records were obtained from citizen science, corresponding to more than those provided by the scientific literature in the intervening 58 years since the earliest record from 1963. Among these, 26 provincial records were previously mentioned in the literature and 50 provincial records are new meaning that the corresponding species was not reported from that province before. When the dates of the records are considered, there are 54 new provincial records in total since four provincial records were obtained by citizen scientists earlier than the previous literature records. These results show that citizen science is an important contributor as a data source, and it provides remarkable contribution for increasing the understanding on expansion of invasive species as well as providing clear picture on their distribution.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/D87087C1D46FFFEAA492FAE2FC04EBB6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Çerçi, Bariş;Karataş, Ahmet;Karataş, Ayşegül	Çerçi, Bariş, Karataş, Ahmet, Karataş, Ayşegül (2021): Insecta non gratae: New Distribution Records of Eight Alien Bug (Hemiptera) Species in Turkey with Contributions of Citizen Science. Zootaxa 5057 (1): 1-28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5057.1.1
