identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
FD7A87A5CD7173139CFFFC0FFE68454E.text	FD7A87A5CD7173139CFFFC0FFE68454E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Smicromyrmillini Argaman 1988	<div><p>Tribe Smicromyrmillini Argaman, 1988</p><p>Diagnosis. MALE (alate or apterous). Eye with few short setae visible under high magnification or asetose. Mesoscutellum apex produced and overhanging metanotum. Propodeum dorsally with three very weakly defined anterior fields and many reticulations forming mini fields over posterior half. S2 with well developed lateral felt line; T2 with short lateral felt line. FEMALE. Eye with few short setae visible under high magnification or asetose. S2 with lateral felt line. T2 lacking felt line. Propodeum with disc and declivity smoothly merging, without any lateral transverse carinae and with two or more posterolateral teeth or spines. T6 with distinct glabrous pygidial area.</p><p>Remarks. The tribe is Afrotropical, Oriental and Palaearctic in distribution with three valid genera: Eosmicromyrmilla Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001, ♂, ♀; Hindustanilla Lelej in Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001, ♂, ♀ in the Oriental Region, and Smicromyrmilla Suárez, 1965, ♂, ♀ in the Palaearctic (two species) and Afrotropical (15 species) Regions. A monotypic genus Cameronilla Lelej in Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001 was previously described in the tribe Smicromyrmillini . Recently (Brothers et al. 2019), it was discovered that the holotype of Mutilla oedipus Cameron, 1897, type species of Cameronilla, belongs to the genus Spilomutilla Ashmead, 1903 from the subfamily Myrmillinae . It is distinct from other species of Spilomutilla in that the male has a strong dorsal median sharp spine on the propodeum. This character, and the three posterior setal spots on T2 resemble the apterous male of Hindustanilla indica Lelej in Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001 ( Ticoplinae), leading to Cameronilla mistakenly being described in that subfamily. Cameronilla Lelej in Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001 became a junior subjective synonym of Spilomutilla Ashmead, 1903 and M. oedipus Cameron is a valid species in Spilomutilla.</p><p>According to Pagliano et al. (2020) the genus Smicromyrmilla numbers 28 species, 10 of them are nomina nuda, eight were initially described in Nanomutilla André, 1900 (Bischoff 1920, Arnold 1960), two in Ctenotilla Bischoff, 1920 (Bischoff 1921), two in Odontotilla Bischoff, 1920 (Arnold 1956) and two in Mutilla Linnaeus, 1758 (André 1896, Péringuey 1898).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FD7A87A5CD7173139CFFFC0FFE68454E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lelej, Arkady S.;Terine, Joshua B.;Kumar, Girish P.	Lelej, Arkady S., Terine, Joshua B., Kumar, Girish P. (2021): New species of Ticoplinae (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) from India. Zootaxa 5052 (4): 567-578, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5052.4.6
FD7A87A5CD7273169CFFFB55FD49431E.text	FD7A87A5CD7273169CFFFB55FD49431E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eosmicromyrmilla Lelej & Krombein 2001	<div><p>Genus Eosmicromyrmilla Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001</p><p>Eosmicromyrmilla Lelej &amp; Krombein 2001: 4; Lelej 2005: 22; Lelej &amp; Brothers 2008: 21; Brothers &amp; Lelej 2017: 93; Pagliano et al. 2020: 22.</p><p>Smicromyrmilla: Lelej et al 2007: 54, ♂.</p><p>Type species Eosmicromyrmilla srilankiensis Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001 (♂, ♀; holotype is ♂), by original designation.</p><p>Diagnosis. MALE. Ratio of pedicel and F1-3 length 1.0:1.1:2.0:2.3. Mesoscutellum apex produced and overhanging metanotum, rounded or curved (not acuminate). Lateral and posterior propodeal faces separated by wavy carina or carina with teeth (in type species). S6 with deep median narrow emargination. Median longitudinal emargination of S8 (hypopygium) carinated laterally and narrowed basally with notch in mid part of carina; wide part of median emargination two thirds of S8 total length. Basal ring of genitalia (cupula, gonocardo) longer than paramere. Volsella lamellate. Body black or with mesosoma mostly red. FEMALE. Medial smooth shiny area of T6 reaching the base, laterally not carinated. Lateral propodeal face microsculptured, not reticulate. Mid and hind tibia with weak spines dorsally.</p><p>Gender. Feminine.</p><p>Sex association. The type species was described from both sexes (Lelej &amp; Krombein 2001).</p><p>Species included. Eosmicromyrmilla srilankiensis Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001, ♂, ♀ (Sri Lanka); E. chinensis Lelej in Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001, ♀ (China: Yunnan); E. pulawskii Lelej, 2005, ♀ (India: Maharashtra); E. margalla (Lelej &amp; Ullah, 2007), comb. nov., ♂ (Pakistan: Islamabad). With the present description of two new species, Eosmicromyrmilla now includes six Oriental species. A key to known species is presented below. The re-analysis of Smicromyrmilla margalla shows that it differs from true Smicromrymilla in the following characters: lateral carina of median narrow longitudinal emargination of S8 with notch, S6 with median narrow emargination, and apex of mesoscutellum rounded. This is why S. margalla is here transferred to the genus Eosmicromyrmilla .</p><p>Natural history. Eosmicromyrmilla srilankiensis is an abundant and widespread species in Sri Lanka. The occurrence per months of 159 specimens collected in 1970, 1976-1981, 1993 are presented in Figure 1. The species is widespread in the Dry Zone of Sri Lanka, mostly at low elevations (Fig. 2). One female and two males were collected in the leaf litter in Hambantota District .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FD7A87A5CD7273169CFFFB55FD49431E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lelej, Arkady S.;Terine, Joshua B.;Kumar, Girish P.	Lelej, Arkady S., Terine, Joshua B., Kumar, Girish P. (2021): New species of Ticoplinae (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) from India. Zootaxa 5052 (4): 567-578, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5052.4.6
FD7A87A5CD7473149CFFFE97FB61401A.text	FD7A87A5CD7473149CFFFE97FB61401A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eosmicromyrmilla subbuka Terine, Lelej & Girish Kumar 2021	<div><p>Eosmicromyrmilla subbuka Terine, Lelej &amp; Girish Kumar, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 3–11, 21–23)</p><p>Diagnosis. MALE. Clypeus convex, punctate, without preapical groove. Pronotum anterodorsally transversely striate, posterodorsally sparsely punctate. Metapleuron dorsally transversely striate, mid and ventral part smooth. Lateral propodeal face reticulate with smooth portion adjacent to metapleuron. S6 strongly concave posteriorly with median narrow emargination almost half the length of visible (punctured) part of S6. S7 hidden. Apical part of paramere almost two times longer than paramere base (lateral view), compressed bilaterally, downcurved and pointed apically; paramere outside basally with long dense whitish setae. Penis valve without tooth preapically. FEMALE. Unknown.</p><p>Description. MALE. Body length 5.55–7.40 mm (holotype 7.04 mm). Coloration and setation. Body black. Ocellar triangle with sparse subappressed white and black setae. Mandible black, preapically brownish. Clypeus with long dense, recumbent white setae. Legs black, mid and hind tibial spurs white, fore tibial spurs brownish. Mandible, frons, vertex and genae with scattered recumbent white setae mixed with few erect black setae. Mesosoma with sparse, recumbent and erect white setae, denser on mesopleuron, mixed with sparse erect black setae on pronotum, mesoscutum and mesoscutellum; mesopleuron with dense white setae above mid coxa. Legs with recumbent and erect white setae. Metasomal segments 1–4 with scattered long, erect whitish setae, T2 disc and T5–7 with sparse long black setae. T1–4 and S2–5 with white apical fringe. S6 and S8 with black setae mixed with few white setae.</p><p>Head. Almost oval (frontal view), not elongated behind eyes, head width 1.16 × maximum pronotal width. Ocelli small, POL 0.55 × OOL. Mandible tridentate, without sub-basal inner tubercle. Ratio of pedicel and F1-3 length 1.0:1.3:2.7:2.7. Clypeus convex, punctate, without preapical groove.</p><p>Mesosoma . Pronotum anterodorsally transversely striate, posterodorsally sparsely punctate, laterally mostly rugulose, pronotal carina strongly developed anteriorly. Mesoscutum sparsely punctate, with parapsidal furrows, notauli lacking. Mesoscutellum produced and overhanging metanotum, posterior margin slightly emarginated, mesoscutellum reticulate, reticulae smaller than on posterior propodeal face. Mesopleuron rugose to reticulate, tegula with smooth disc and few punctures marginally. Metapleuron in dorsal half transversely rugose, mid and ventral part smooth. Propodeal lateral face reticulate with smooth part adjacent to metapleuron. Dorsal and posterior propodeal faces reticulate, reticulae size larger towards metapostnotum, posterior and lateral propodeal faces separated by wavy carina.</p><p>Wings. Forewing evenly setose, hyaline except brownish apical third, veins brown, veins distal of cells nebulose; two submarginal cells, second submarginal cell petiolate with marginal cell and smaller than marginal cell, marginal cell with four abscissae.</p><p>Metasoma. T1 maximum width 0.75 × T2 maximum width, T1 length 0.5 × T2 length, T1 not constricted posteriorly. T2 with short lateral felt line, S2 with long lateral felt lines. S6 strongly concave posteriorly with median narrow emargination almost half the length of visible (punctured) part of S6. S7 hidden, not visible. S8 (hypopygium) with median longitudinal narrow emargination which carinated laterally and narrowed basally, with notch on half of carina, and oblique carina from notch to latero-basal corner of S8, densely punctate laterad of emargination.</p><p>Genitalia. Apical part of paramere almost two times longer than paramere base (lateral view), compressed bilaterally, downcurved and pointed apically; paramere outside basally with long dense whitish setae, apically with sparse whitish setae. Penis valve lamellate, apically rounded, without preapical tooth. Volsella lamellate, ventrally and apically with long yellowish setae.</p><p>Paratypes. Similar to the holotype except one paratype from Karnataka has the mesopleuron with dense setae obscuring the reticulations. Body length: 5.55 mm.</p><p>FEMALE. Unknown.</p><p>Material examined. Holotype ♂, INDIA, Goa, North Goa district, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=74.18778&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=15.596666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 74.18778/lat 15.596666)">Madei Wildlife Sanctuary</a>, 15°35′48″N 74°11′16″E, 800 m, 15.V.2018, coll. P. Girish Kumar &amp; party, ZSI/ WGRC /IR/INV.15049 [ZSIK] . Paratypes. INDIA: Goa, North Goa district, Madei Wildlife Sanctuary, 15°35′48″N 74°11′16″E, 800 m, 15. V.2018, 5 ♂, coll. P. Girish Kumar &amp; party, ZSI/ WGRC /IR/INV.15050-15054 [ZSIK]; North Goa district, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=74.1064&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=15.4401" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 74.1064/lat 15.4401)">Bondla Wildlife Sanctuary</a>, 15.4401°N 74.1064°E, 914.4 m, 16. V.2018, 3 ♂, coll. P. Girish Kumar &amp; party, ZSI/ WGRC /IR/INV.15055-15057 [ZSIK]. Karnataka, Chikmagalur district, Bygoor, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=75.70638&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=13.351389" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 75.70638/lat 13.351389)">Kabbinahalli</a> coffee estate, 13°21′05″N 75°42′23″E, 1208 m, 16. V.2018, 1 ♂, coll. P. Girish Kumar &amp; party, ZSI/ WGRC /IR/INV.15058 [ZSIK] .</p><p>Distribution. India: Goa, Karnataka.</p><p>Etymology. This species is named in honor of Kumarapuram A. Subramanian (nickname subbuka), Scientist-E &amp; Officer-in-Charge (Southern Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Tamil Nadu, India) for his contribution to aquatic insect taxonomy and encouragement for this study. Treat as a noun in apposition.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FD7A87A5CD7473149CFFFE97FB61401A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lelej, Arkady S.;Terine, Joshua B.;Kumar, Girish P.	Lelej, Arkady S., Terine, Joshua B., Kumar, Girish P. (2021): New species of Ticoplinae (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) from India. Zootaxa 5052 (4): 567-578, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5052.4.6
FD7A87A5CD76731B9CFFFD93FD78438A.text	FD7A87A5CD76731B9CFFFD93FD78438A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eosmicromyrmilla balakrishnani Terine, Lelej & Girish Kumar 2021	<div><p>Eosmicromyrmilla balakrishnani Terine, Lelej &amp; Girish Kumar, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 12–20, 24–26)</p><p>Diagnosis. MALE. Clypeus convex, punctate, with preapical groove. Pronotum conspicuously reticulate. Metapleuron dorsally transversely striate, mid and ventral part with weak rugae and few punctures. Lateral propodeal face reticulate with weak rugae adjacent to metapleuron. Lateral and posterior propodeal faces separated by wavy sub-dentate carina. S6 posteriorly with strong angulate concavity and median narrow emargination almost half the length of visible (punctured) part of S6. S7 partly visible. Apical part of paramere 1.5 times longer than paramere base (lateral view), compressed bilaterally, downcurved and pointed apically; paramere outside with few short whitish setae. Penis valve lamellate, apically rounded, with blunt tooth preapically. FEMALE. Unknown.</p><p>Description. MALE. Body length 5.79–8.27 (holotype 8.27 mm). Coloration and setation. Body black. Ocellar triangle with sparse subappressed black and white setae. Mandibles black with small preapical brownish spot. Clypeus with long dense recumbent white setae. Legs black, mid and hind tibial spurs white, fore tibial spurs brownish. Mandible, frons, vertex and genae with scattered recumbent white setae mixed with few erect black setae. Mesosoma with sparse, recumbent and erect white setae, which denser on mesopleuron, mixed with sparse erect black setae on pronotum, mesoscutum and mesoscutellum. Mesopleuron with dense white setae above mid coxa. Legs with recumbent and erect white setae. Metasomal segments 1–4 with scattered long, erect white setae, T2 disc and T5–7 with sparse long black setae. T1–4 and S2–5 with apical fringe of white setae. S6 with long white erect setae mixed with shorter recumbent black setae, S8 with long erect brownish setae mixed with shorter recumbent black setae.</p><p>Head. Almost oval (frontal view), not elongated behind eyes, head width 1.13 × maximal pronotal width. Ocelli small, POL 0.55 × OOL. Mandible tridentate, without sub-basal inner tubercle. Ratio of pedicel and F1–3 length 1.0:1.2:3.3:3.3. Clypeus convex, punctate, with preapical groove.</p><p>Mesosoma. Pronotum densely punctate, laterally mostly rugulose, anteriorly pronotal carina strongly developed. Mesoscutum sparsely punctate, with parapsidal furrows, notauli lacking. Mesoscutellum produced and overhanging metanotum, posterior margin slightly emarginated, mesoscutellum reticulate, reticulae size smaller than on propodeal posterior face. Mesopleuron rugose to densely punctate; tegula with smooth disc and large punctures anteriorly and posteriorly. Metapleuron transversely striate dorsally, mid and ventral part with weak rugae and few punctures. Lateral propodeal face reticulate with weak rugae adjacent to metapleuron. Dorsal and posterior propodeal faces reticulate, reticulae size larger towards metapostnotum, posterior and lateral propodeal faces separated by wavy carina.</p><p>Wings. Forewing evenly setose, hyaline except brownish apical third, veins brown, veins distal of cell nebulose; two submarginal cells, second submarginal cell petiolate with marginal cell and smaller than marginal cell, marginal cell with four abscissae.</p><p>Metasoma. T1 maximum width 0.75 × T2 maximum width, T1 length 0.57 × T2 length, T1 not constricted posteriorly. T2 with short lateral felt line, S2 with long lateral felt lines. S6 posteriorly with strong angulate concavity and median narrow emargination almost half the length of visible (punctured) part of S6. S7 partly visible. S8 (hypopygium) with median longitudinal narrow emargination which carinated laterally and narrowed basally, with notch near apical third of carina, and oblique carina from notch to latero-basal corner of S8, densely punctate laterad of emargination.</p><p>Genitalia. Apical part of paramere 1.5 times longer than paramere base (lateral view), compressed bilaterally, downcurved and pointed apically; paramere outside with few short whitish setae. Penis valve lamellate, apically rounded, with blunt tooth preapically. Volsella lamellate, ventrally and apically with long yellowish setae.</p><p>Paratypes. Body length 5.79–6.34 mm; white setae denser at gena.</p><p>FEMALE. Unknown.</p><p>Material examined. Holotype ♂, INDIA, Kerala, Wayanad district, Muthanga, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=76.390656&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=11.688891" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 76.390656/lat 11.688891)">Ponkuzhi</a>, 11°41'20.01"N 76°23′26.38″E, 844 m, 7.II.2021, coll. K.A. Subramanian &amp; party, ZSI/ WGRC /IR/INV.17651 [ZSIK] . Paratypes. INDIA: Kerala, Wayanad district, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=76.33806&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=11.68234" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 76.33806/lat 11.68234)">Edavambam</a>, 11°40′56.42″N 76°20′17.00″E, 876 m, 20.II.2021, 2 ♂, K.A. Subramanian &amp; party, ZSI/ WGRC /IR/INV.17652-17653 [ZSIK] .</p><p>Distribution. India: Kerala.</p><p>Etymology. This species is named in honor of Balakrishnan Valappil for his dedication to the study of natural history and taxonomy of Indian Lepidoptera .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FD7A87A5CD76731B9CFFFD93FD78438A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lelej, Arkady S.;Terine, Joshua B.;Kumar, Girish P.	Lelej, Arkady S., Terine, Joshua B., Kumar, Girish P. (2021): New species of Ticoplinae (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) from India. Zootaxa 5052 (4): 567-578, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5052.4.6
FD7A87A5CD79731B9CFFFAE2FA6A45F0.text	FD7A87A5CD79731B9CFFFAE2FA6A45F0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eosmicromyrmilla Lelej & Krombein 2001	<div><p>Key to the species of Eosmicromyrmilla Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001</p><p>1. Males, fully winged (unknown in E. chinensis and E. pulawskii)............................................... 2</p><p>- Females, wingless (unknown in E. balakrishnani, E. margalla and E. subbuka).................................... 5</p><p>2. Mesoscutum with well developed admedian line. Lateral and posterior propodeal faces separated by wavy carina with one long (basal) and two short teeth. Body black with mesosoma red. Sri Lanka ........... E. srilankiensis Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001</p><p>- Mesoscutum at most with weak admedian line. Lateral and posterior propodeal faces separated by wavy tuberculate carina. Body totally black.................................................................................... 3</p><p>3. S6 posteriorly with strong angulate concavity, anterior part of this concavity more or less transverse and parallel to posterior border of S7 or S5. India: Kerala ..................................................... E. balakrishnani sp. nov.</p><p>- S6 posteriorly with strong non-angulate concavity, anterior part of this concavity curved and not parallel to posterior border of S7 or S5............................................................................................ 4</p><p>4. Metapleuron transversely striate dorsally and ventrally, smooth medially. Lateral propodeal face totally reticulate. Pakistan: Islamabad...................................................... E. margalla (Lelej &amp; Ullah, 2007), comb. nov.</p><p>- Metapleuron transversely striate dorsally, smooth ventrally and medially. Lateral propodeal face reticulate with smooth part adjacent to metapleuron. India: Goa, Karnataka ............................................. E. subbuka sp. nov.</p><p>5. Head ferruginous-red.................................................................................. 6</p><p>- Head black.—Clypeus without medial basal tubercle. Mesosoma length 1.4 × maximal pronotal width. T1 with large medial spot of yellowish setae, T2 apical band of yellowish setae expanded medially and laterally. China: Yunnan .............................................................................. E. chinensis Lelej in Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001</p><p>6. Mesosoma length 1.5 × maximal pronotal width. T1 dorsally with medial spot of silver setae and laterally with short erect silver setae. T2 with three spots of silver setae apically. India: Maharashtra ......................... E. pulawskii Lelej, 2005</p><p>- Mesosoma length 1.2 × maximal pronotal width. T1 dorsally with lateral patch of short silver setae, medial patch lacking or, rarely, with a few short silver setae. T2 apically with medial triangle and small lateral transverse spots of whitish setae. Sri Lanka .............................................................. E. srilankiensis Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FD7A87A5CD79731B9CFFFAE2FA6A45F0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lelej, Arkady S.;Terine, Joshua B.;Kumar, Girish P.	Lelej, Arkady S., Terine, Joshua B., Kumar, Girish P. (2021): New species of Ticoplinae (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) from India. Zootaxa 5052 (4): 567-578, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5052.4.6
FD7A87A5CD79731B9CFFFE2CFA6A46D1.text	FD7A87A5CD79731B9CFFFE2CFA6A46D1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Smicromyrmillini Argaman 1988	<div><p>Key to the Old-World genera of the tribe Smicromyrmillini</p><p>1. Wings almost always well developed (male)............................................................... 2</p><p>- Wings absent or rudimentary (female, rarely male).......................................................... 3</p><p>2. Lateral carina of median narrow longitudinal emargination of S8 (hypopygium) with notch near its half or apical third of carina length. Wide part of median emargination of S8 two thirds of S8 median length. Ratio of length of F1–3 1.1:2.0:2.3. S6 with median narrow emargination. Oriental Region ........................... Eosmicromyrmilla Lelej et Krombein, 2001</p><p>- Lateral carina of median narrow longitudinal emargination of S8 (hypopygium) without notch.Wide part of median emargination of S8 five sixths of S8 median length. Ratio of length of F1–3 1.0:1.5:2.0. S6 without median emargination. Palaearctic and Afrotropical Regions...................................................... Smicromyrmilla Suárez, 1965, part.</p><p>3. Apterous males. Ocelli developed. Antenna with 13 articles................................................... 4</p><p>- Female. Ocelli lacking. Antenna with 12 articles............................................................ 5</p><p>4. Propodeum with long medial spine dorsally. T1 dorsally with one median round spot of silver setae and lateral patch of same setae. Oriental Region ............................................................................................. Hindustanilla Lelej in Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001 (one male species H. indica Lelej in Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001)</p><p>- Propodeum without medial spines dorsally. T1 dorsally with apical band of whitish setae. Afrotropical Region................................................................................... Smicromyrmilla Suárez, 1965, part.</p><p>5. Smooth medial part of T6 not reaching the base of segment (tergum punctured basally and laterally). Lateral pronotal margin shorter than lateral mesonotal margin. T1 laterally without silver patches of setae.......... Smicromyrmilla Suárez, 1965</p><p>- Smooth medial part of T6 reaching the base of segment (tergum punctured only laterally). Lateral pronotal margin longer than lateral mesonotal margin. T1 laterally with silver patch....................................................... 6</p><p>6. Smooth medial part of T6 weakly carinated laterally and narrowed basally. Lateral propodeal face strongly reticulate. Mid and hind tibia with strong spines dorsally............................................................................... Hindustanilla Lelej in Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001 (one female species H. nathani Lelej in Lelej &amp; Krombein, 2001)</p><p>- Smooth medial shiny part of T6 not carinated laterally. Lateral propodeal face microsculptured, not reticulate. Mid and hind tibia with weak spines dorsally........................................ Eosmicromyrmilla Lelej et Krombein, 2001</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FD7A87A5CD79731B9CFFFE2CFA6A46D1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lelej, Arkady S.;Terine, Joshua B.;Kumar, Girish P.	Lelej, Arkady S., Terine, Joshua B., Kumar, Girish P. (2021): New species of Ticoplinae (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) from India. Zootaxa 5052 (4): 567-578, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5052.4.6
