taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
CF0387C3D50BB158FC8BA643FE8BF939.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583913/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583913	Fig. 4. Ototyphlonemertes (duplex) chernyshevi sp. nov. A, Entire body; B, composite photomicrograph of squeezed specimen; C–E, statoliths; F, stylet apparatus, G, H, central stylets and bases; I, posterior end of body. A, C, F, I, ICHUM 5348 (holotype); B, G, ICHUM 5349 (paratype); E, H, ICHUM 5350 (paratype).	Fig. 4. Ototyphlonemertes (duplex) chernyshevi sp. nov. A, Entire body; B, composite photomicrograph of squeezed specimen; C–E, statoliths; F, stylet apparatus, G, H, central stylets and bases; I, posterior end of body. A, C, F, I, ICHUM 5348 (holotype); B, G, ICHUM 5349 (paratype); E, H, ICHUM 5350 (paratype).	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D506B159FF0DA602FECBFC2A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583917/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583917	Fig. 5. Ototyphlonemertes (duplex) envalli sp. nov. A, Entire body; B, C, composite photomicrographs of squeezed specimens; D, E, statoliths; F, stylet apparatus; G, H, central stylets and bases; I, posterior end of body. A, B, D, G, ICHUM 5351 (jolotype); C, E, F, ICHUM 5353 (paratype); H, I, ICHUM 5352 (paratype).	Fig. 5. Ototyphlonemertes (duplex) envalli sp. nov. A, Entire body; B, C, composite photomicrographs of squeezed specimens; D, E, statoliths; F, stylet apparatus; G, H, central stylets and bases; I, posterior end of body. A, B, D, G, ICHUM 5351 (jolotype); C, E, F, ICHUM 5353 (paratype); H, I, ICHUM 5352 (paratype).	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D506B159FF0DA602FECBFC2A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583907/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583907	Fig. 2. Part of the phylogenetic tree resulting from the maximum-likelihood analysis of COI (ln L=−15264.650301), along with results of three species-delimitation analyses, ABGD, PTP, and TCS, as indicated by vertical bars. Numbers near nodes indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap support value.	Fig. 2. Part of the phylogenetic tree resulting from the maximum-likelihood analysis of COI (ln L=−15264.650301), along with results of three species-delimitation analyses, ABGD, PTP, and TCS, as indicated by vertical bars. Numbers near nodes indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap support value.	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D507B159FF36A2F1FB16FCA9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583921/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583921	Fig. 6. Ototyphlonemertes (duplex) norenburgi sp. nov. A, B, Entire body; C, composite photomicrograph of squeezed specimen; D, statoliths; E, stylet apparatus; F, central stylet and basis; G, posterior end of body. A, C, D, E, ICHUM 5355 (holotype); B, F, G, ICHUM 5356 (paratype).	Fig. 6. Ototyphlonemertes (duplex) norenburgi sp. nov. A, B, Entire body; C, composite photomicrograph of squeezed specimen; D, statoliths; E, stylet apparatus; F, central stylet and basis; G, posterior end of body. A, C, D, E, ICHUM 5355 (holotype); B, F, G, ICHUM 5356 (paratype).	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D507B159FF36A2F1FB16FCA9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583907/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583907	Fig. 2. Part of the phylogenetic tree resulting from the maximum-likelihood analysis of COI (ln L=−15264.650301), along with results of three species-delimitation analyses, ABGD, PTP, and TCS, as indicated by vertical bars. Numbers near nodes indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap support value.	Fig. 2. Part of the phylogenetic tree resulting from the maximum-likelihood analysis of COI (ln L=−15264.650301), along with results of three species-delimitation analyses, ABGD, PTP, and TCS, as indicated by vertical bars. Numbers near nodes indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap support value.	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D507B15BFC4AA273FBB2FEA1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583925/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583925	Fig. 7. Ototyphlonemertes (macintoshi) ani Chernyshev, 2007. A, Entire body; B, composite photomicrograph of squeezed specimen; C–J, statoliths (arrowhead on C indicates additional statolith); K, proboscis diaphragm and middle chamber; L, everted proboscis (arrowheads indicating rhabdoid-like papillae); M, central stylet and basis. A, E, M, ICHUM 5359; B, D, ICHUM 5358; C, K, ICHUM 5357; F, L, ICHUM 5360; G, ICHUM 5361; H, ICHUM 5362; I, ICHUM 5363; J, ICHUM 5364.	Fig. 7. Ototyphlonemertes (macintoshi) ani Chernyshev, 2007. A, Entire body; B, composite photomicrograph of squeezed specimen; C–J, statoliths (arrowhead on C indicates additional statolith); K, proboscis diaphragm and middle chamber; L, everted proboscis (arrowheads indicating rhabdoid-like papillae); M, central stylet and basis. A, E, M, ICHUM 5359; B, D, ICHUM 5358; C, K, ICHUM 5357; F, L, ICHUM 5360; G, ICHUM 5361; H, ICHUM 5362; I, ICHUM 5363; J, ICHUM 5364.	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D507B15BFC4AA273FBB2FEA1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583909/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583909	Fig. 3. Part of the phylogenetic tree resulting from the maximum-likelihood analysis of COI (ln L=−15264.650301), along with results of three species-delimitation analyses, ABGD, PTP, and TCS, as indicated by vertical bars. Numbers near nodes indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap support value.	Fig. 3. Part of the phylogenetic tree resulting from the maximum-likelihood analysis of COI (ln L=−15264.650301), along with results of three species-delimitation analyses, ABGD, PTP, and TCS, as indicated by vertical bars. Numbers near nodes indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap support value.	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D505B15BFC72A06AFAEBFA73.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583929/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583929	Fig. 8. Ototyphlonemertes (parmula) lei sp. nov., ICHUM 5365 (holotype). A, Entire body; B, composite photomicrograph of squeezed specimen; C, statolith; D, central stylet and basis.	Fig. 8. Ototyphlonemertes (parmula) lei sp. nov., ICHUM 5365 (holotype). A, Entire body; B, composite photomicrograph of squeezed specimen; C, statolith; D, central stylet and basis.	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D505B15BFC72A06AFAEBFA73.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583907/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583907	Fig. 2. Part of the phylogenetic tree resulting from the maximum-likelihood analysis of COI (ln L=−15264.650301), along with results of three species-delimitation analyses, ABGD, PTP, and TCS, as indicated by vertical bars. Numbers near nodes indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap support value.	Fig. 2. Part of the phylogenetic tree resulting from the maximum-likelihood analysis of COI (ln L=−15264.650301), along with results of three species-delimitation analyses, ABGD, PTP, and TCS, as indicated by vertical bars. Numbers near nodes indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap support value.	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D505B15FFC93A4B8FE6CFF1E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583935/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583935	Fig. 9. Ototyphlonemertes (parmula) nakaoae sp. nov. A, D, Entire body; B, F, composite photomicrographs of squeezed specimens; C, posterior end of body; E, enlargement of head, anaesthetized specimen. A–C, ICHUM 5366 (holotype); D–F, ICHUM 5368 (paratype).	Fig. 9. Ototyphlonemertes (parmula) nakaoae sp. nov. A, D, Entire body; B, F, composite photomicrographs of squeezed specimens; C, posterior end of body; E, enlargement of head, anaesthetized specimen. A–C, ICHUM 5366 (holotype); D–F, ICHUM 5368 (paratype).	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D505B15FFC93A4B8FE6CFF1E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583937/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583937	Fig. 10. Ototyphlonemertes (parmula) nakaoae sp. nov. A, B, Composite photomicrographs of squeezed specimens; C–F, statoliths; G, stylet apparatus; H–K, central stylets and bases. A, E, J, ICHUM 5367 (paratype); B, F, K, ICHUM 5369 (paratype); C, G, H, ICHUM 5366 (holotype); D, I, ICHUM 5368 (paratype).	Fig. 10. Ototyphlonemertes (parmula) nakaoae sp. nov. A, B, Composite photomicrographs of squeezed specimens; C–F, statoliths; G, stylet apparatus; H–K, central stylets and bases. A, E, J, ICHUM 5367 (paratype); B, F, K, ICHUM 5369 (paratype); C, G, H, ICHUM 5366 (holotype); D, I, ICHUM 5368 (paratype).	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D505B15FFC93A4B8FE6CFF1E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583907/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583907	Fig. 2. Part of the phylogenetic tree resulting from the maximum-likelihood analysis of COI (ln L=−15264.650301), along with results of three species-delimitation analyses, ABGD, PTP, and TCS, as indicated by vertical bars. Numbers near nodes indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap support value.	Fig. 2. Part of the phylogenetic tree resulting from the maximum-likelihood analysis of COI (ln L=−15264.650301), along with results of three species-delimitation analyses, ABGD, PTP, and TCS, as indicated by vertical bars. Numbers near nodes indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap support value.	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D501B15FFF2CA025FD06F919.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583939/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583939	Fig. 11. Ototyphlonemertes (parmula) tsukagoshii sp. nov. A, Entire body; B, C, composite photomicrographs of squeezed specimens; D, E, statoliths; F, partially everted proboscis; G, H, central stylets and bases. A, B, D, F, G, ICHUM 5371 (holotype); C, E, H, ICHUM 5372 (paratype).	Fig. 11. Ototyphlonemertes (parmula) tsukagoshii sp. nov. A, Entire body; B, C, composite photomicrographs of squeezed specimens; D, E, statoliths; F, partially everted proboscis; G, H, central stylets and bases. A, B, D, F, G, ICHUM 5371 (holotype); C, E, H, ICHUM 5372 (paratype).	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
CF0387C3D501B15FFF2CA025FD06F919.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583907/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583907	Fig. 2. Part of the phylogenetic tree resulting from the maximum-likelihood analysis of COI (ln L=−15264.650301), along with results of three species-delimitation analyses, ABGD, PTP, and TCS, as indicated by vertical bars. Numbers near nodes indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap support value.	Fig. 2. Part of the phylogenetic tree resulting from the maximum-likelihood analysis of COI (ln L=−15264.650301), along with results of three species-delimitation analyses, ABGD, PTP, and TCS, as indicated by vertical bars. Numbers near nodes indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap support value.	2018-05-25	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri		Zenodo	biologists	Kajihara, Hiroshi;Tamura, Kotaro;Tomioka, Shinri			
