taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
FD2E87CAFFB8FF9FC5187D8EBBFBFCDD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4584060/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4584060	Fig. 8. Composetia tokashikiensis Sato, 2020, from Songkhla Lagoon, Thailand (PMBC 29970). A, dorsal views of the anterior body with the everted proboscis; B, ventral view of the everted proboscis; C, posterior view of right parapodium 1; D, posterior view of right parapodium 5; E, anterior view of right parapodium 5; F, posterior view of right parapodium 20. G, posterior view of right parapodium 46. H, homogomph spiniger from upper neurochaetae in parapodium 1; I, heterogomph spiniger with short blade from lower neurochaetae (lower position) in parapodium 5; J, heterogomph falciger from upper neurochaetae in parapodium 1. Abbreviations: g, glandular patch; i, neuropodial inferior lobe; ne, neuroacicula; no, notoacicula; p, neuropodial postchaetal lobe. Scale bars: 1mm (A, B); 0.1mm (C–G); 0.05mm (H–J).	Fig. 8. Composetia tokashikiensis Sato, 2020, from Songkhla Lagoon, Thailand (PMBC 29970). A, dorsal views of the anterior body with the everted proboscis; B, ventral view of the everted proboscis; C, posterior view of right parapodium 1; D, posterior view of right parapodium 5; E, anterior view of right parapodium 5; F, posterior view of right parapodium 20. G, posterior view of right parapodium 46. H, homogomph spiniger from upper neurochaetae in parapodium 1; I, heterogomph spiniger with short blade from lower neurochaetae (lower position) in parapodium 5; J, heterogomph falciger from upper neurochaetae in parapodium 1. Abbreviations: g, glandular patch; i, neuropodial inferior lobe; ne, neuroacicula; no, notoacicula; p, neuropodial postchaetal lobe. Scale bars: 1mm (A, B); 0.1mm (C–G); 0.05mm (H–J).	2020-01-01	Sato, Masanori;Ebihara, Takumi;Satake, Kiyoshi;Kojima, Shigeaki;Fukumori, Hiroaki;Angsupanich, Saowapa		Zenodo	biologists	Sato, Masanori;Ebihara, Takumi;Satake, Kiyoshi;Kojima, Shigeaki;Fukumori, Hiroaki;Angsupanich, Saowapa			
FD2E87CAFFB8FF9FC5187D8EBBFBFCDD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4584044/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4584044	Fig. 1. Distributions of two species of Composetia. *Mitochondrial COI gene was analyzed.	Fig. 1. Distributions of two species of Composetia. *Mitochondrial COI gene was analyzed.	2020-01-01	Sato, Masanori;Ebihara, Takumi;Satake, Kiyoshi;Kojima, Shigeaki;Fukumori, Hiroaki;Angsupanich, Saowapa		Zenodo	biologists	Sato, Masanori;Ebihara, Takumi;Satake, Kiyoshi;Kojima, Shigeaki;Fukumori, Hiroaki;Angsupanich, Saowapa			
FD2E87CAFFB8FF9FC5187D8EBBFBFCDD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4584054/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4584054	Fig. 6. Geographical variation in the number of paragnaths on areas I (A), II (B), III (C), IV (D) and all areas (E) in proboscis of two species of Composetia collected from 10 localities in the middle and southern Ryukyu Islands, southern Japan. Numbers of paragnaths on the areas II and IV were represented by the larger number in either right or left sides. Average and SD bar are shown in each locality. The number on each datum indicates sample size. The localities are arranged from north to south. Difference of mean numbers between the sympatric populations of C. kumensis and C. tokashikiensis was not significant (NS, P>0.05) or significant (*P<0.05; **P<0.001; ***P<0.0001) by the Mann-Whitney U-test. a, Amami-oshima (site numbers in Fig. 1 and Table 1: 1–5); b, Kakeromajima (6, 7); c, Kikai-jima (8); d, Tokuno-shima (9); e, Okinawa-jima (10–15); f, Tokashiki-jima (16), g1, northern Kume-jima (17–20); g2, southern Kume-jima (21); h, Ishigaki-jima (22–27); i, Yonaguni-jima (28).	Fig. 6. Geographical variation in the number of paragnaths on areas I (A), II (B), III (C), IV (D) and all areas (E) in proboscis of two species of Composetia collected from 10 localities in the middle and southern Ryukyu Islands, southern Japan. Numbers of paragnaths on the areas II and IV were represented by the larger number in either right or left sides. Average and SD bar are shown in each locality. The number on each datum indicates sample size. The localities are arranged from north to south. Difference of mean numbers between the sympatric populations of C. kumensis and C. tokashikiensis was not significant (NS, P>0.05) or significant (*P<0.05; **P<0.001; ***P<0.0001) by the Mann-Whitney U-test. a, Amami-oshima (site numbers in Fig. 1 and Table 1: 1–5); b, Kakeromajima (6, 7); c, Kikai-jima (8); d, Tokuno-shima (9); e, Okinawa-jima (10–15); f, Tokashiki-jima (16), g1, northern Kume-jima (17–20); g2, southern Kume-jima (21); h, Ishigaki-jima (22–27); i, Yonaguni-jima (28).	2020-01-01	Sato, Masanori;Ebihara, Takumi;Satake, Kiyoshi;Kojima, Shigeaki;Fukumori, Hiroaki;Angsupanich, Saowapa		Zenodo	biologists	Sato, Masanori;Ebihara, Takumi;Satake, Kiyoshi;Kojima, Shigeaki;Fukumori, Hiroaki;Angsupanich, Saowapa			
FD2E87CAFFB8FF9FC5187D8EBBFBFCDD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4584058/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4584058	Fig. 7. Geographical variation in the number of anterior chaetigers of two species of Composetia collected from 10 localities in the middle and southern Ryukyu Islands, southern Japan. Average and SD bar are shown in each locality. The number on each datum indicates sample size. The localities are arranged from north to south. Abbreviations of localities are the same as in Fig. 6. *Difference of mean numbers between the sympatric populations of C. kumensis and C. tokashikiensis was significant (Mann–Whitney Utest, P=0.0016).	Fig. 7. Geographical variation in the number of anterior chaetigers of two species of Composetia collected from 10 localities in the middle and southern Ryukyu Islands, southern Japan. Average and SD bar are shown in each locality. The number on each datum indicates sample size. The localities are arranged from north to south. Abbreviations of localities are the same as in Fig. 6. *Difference of mean numbers between the sympatric populations of C. kumensis and C. tokashikiensis was significant (Mann–Whitney Utest, P=0.0016).	2020-01-01	Sato, Masanori;Ebihara, Takumi;Satake, Kiyoshi;Kojima, Shigeaki;Fukumori, Hiroaki;Angsupanich, Saowapa		Zenodo	biologists	Sato, Masanori;Ebihara, Takumi;Satake, Kiyoshi;Kojima, Shigeaki;Fukumori, Hiroaki;Angsupanich, Saowapa			
