taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03D587965102E77E4D95F9A808B4FDCB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583762/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583762	Fig. 6. Lumbrinerides shimodaensis based on specimens from Kumano Nada. A–F, 505 B, collected from Irago Strait: A, anterior end of specimen; B, parapodium 1; C, parapodium 8; D, parapodium 21; E, maxillae; F, mandibles; G, H, 505 A, collected from Irago Strait: G, maxillae; H, mandibles.	Fig. 6. Lumbrinerides shimodaensis based on specimens from Kumano Nada. A–F, 505 B, collected from Irago Strait: A, anterior end of specimen; B, parapodium 1; C, parapodium 8; D, parapodium 21; E, maxillae; F, mandibles; G, H, 505 A, collected from Irago Strait: G, maxillae; H, mandibles.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965102E77E4D95F9A808B4FDCB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583764/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583764	Fig. 7. Maxillae of Lumbrinerides shimodaensis. A-1, maxilla I of holotype (NSMT-Pol H-197); A-2, maxilla II; A-3, drawing of maxillae after original description by Imajima (1985: fig. 3i); B-1, maxilla I of holotype (NSMT-Pol H-198) of L. lineatus Imajima, 1985, showing damaged or absent parts; B-2, maxilla I of paratype (NSMT-Pol P-199) of same species; B-3, drawing of maxillae after original description of same species by Imajima (1985: fig. 4g); B-4, drawing of maxilla II after original description of same species by Imajima (1985: fig. 4h); C-1, maxilla I of holotype (NSMT-Pol H-200) of L. bidentatus Imajima, 1985; C-2, maxilla I of paratype (NSMT-Pol P-201) of same species; C-3, maxilla II of paratype (NSMT-Pol P-201); C-4, drawing of maxillae after original description of same species by Imajima (1985: fig. 5i); C-5, drawing of maxillae I and II after original description of same species by Imajima (1985: fig. 5j, l). A-3, B-3, B-4, C-4, and C-5 are reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Scale bar: 0.1mm. Arrows indicate basal projections not recognized accessory teeth.	Fig. 7. Maxillae of Lumbrinerides shimodaensis. A-1, maxilla I of holotype (NSMT-Pol H-197); A-2, maxilla II; A-3, drawing of maxillae after original description by Imajima (1985: fig. 3i); B-1, maxilla I of holotype (NSMT-Pol H-198) of L. lineatus Imajima, 1985, showing damaged or absent parts; B-2, maxilla I of paratype (NSMT-Pol P-199) of same species; B-3, drawing of maxillae after original description of same species by Imajima (1985: fig. 4g); B-4, drawing of maxilla II after original description of same species by Imajima (1985: fig. 4h); C-1, maxilla I of holotype (NSMT-Pol H-200) of L. bidentatus Imajima, 1985; C-2, maxilla I of paratype (NSMT-Pol P-201) of same species; C-3, maxilla II of paratype (NSMT-Pol P-201); C-4, drawing of maxillae after original description of same species by Imajima (1985: fig. 5i); C-5, drawing of maxillae I and II after original description of same species by Imajima (1985: fig. 5j, l). A-3, B-3, B-4, C-4, and C-5 are reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Scale bar: 0.1mm. Arrows indicate basal projections not recognized accessory teeth.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965102E77E4D95F9A808B4FDCB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583766/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583766	Fig. 8. Lumbrinerides shimodaensis. A, maxillae of an exceptionally large specimen (KT84-12 Station 12-1, 1.2mm body width) collected from Kii Channel; B, mandibles of same; C, maxillae of a smaller specimen (505A, 0.51mm body width) collected from Irago Strait (Fig. 6G) in same magnification.	Fig. 8. Lumbrinerides shimodaensis. A, maxillae of an exceptionally large specimen (KT84-12 Station 12-1, 1.2mm body width) collected from Kii Channel; B, mandibles of same; C, maxillae of a smaller specimen (505A, 0.51mm body width) collected from Irago Strait (Fig. 6G) in same magnification.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965102E77E4D95F9A808B4FDCB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583768/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583768	Fig. 9. Chaetal distribution in Lumbrinerides shimodaensis Imajima, 1985. NSMT-Pol H-197, holotype of L. shimodaensis; NSMT- Pol H-198, holotype of L. lineatus Imajima, 1985; NSMT-Pol P-199, paratype of same; NSMT-Pol H-200, holotype of L. bidentatus Imajima, 1985; NSMT-Pol H-202, holotype of L. acutuss japonicus Imajima, 1985; NSMT-Pol P-203, paratype of same. Numbers of hooks (closed circles) and limbate chaetae (open circles) per parapodium plotted on each parapodium from first to last chaetigers of fragmented specimens.	Fig. 9. Chaetal distribution in Lumbrinerides shimodaensis Imajima, 1985. NSMT-Pol H-197, holotype of L. shimodaensis; NSMT- Pol H-198, holotype of L. lineatus Imajima, 1985; NSMT-Pol P-199, paratype of same; NSMT-Pol H-200, holotype of L. bidentatus Imajima, 1985; NSMT-Pol H-202, holotype of L. acutuss japonicus Imajima, 1985; NSMT-Pol P-203, paratype of same. Numbers of hooks (closed circles) and limbate chaetae (open circles) per parapodium plotted on each parapodium from first to last chaetigers of fragmented specimens.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965102E77E4D95F9A808B4FDCB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583770/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583770	Fig. 10. Chaetal distribution pattern in five specimens of Lumbrinerides shimodaensis Imajima, 1985 from Kumano Nada. Numbers of hooks (closed circles) and limbate chaetae (open circles) per parapodium plotted on each parapodium from first to last chaetigers of fragmented specimens.	Fig. 10. Chaetal distribution pattern in five specimens of Lumbrinerides shimodaensis Imajima, 1985 from Kumano Nada. Numbers of hooks (closed circles) and limbate chaetae (open circles) per parapodium plotted on each parapodium from first to last chaetigers of fragmented specimens.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965102E77E4D95F9A808B4FDCB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583754/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583754	Fig. 2. Frequency histograms (%) for each local sample containing more than 20 specimens (treated initially as operational taxonomic units). Characters assessed included mean number of accessory teeth on maxilla I plates, number of anterior reduced parapodia, prostomium length to width proportion, chaetiger number on which first hooks present, number of concentric lines on mandibles and body width (mm). White bars represent juveniles or growing phase; black bars represent specimens grown sufficiently for use for taxonomic purposes.	Fig. 2. Frequency histograms (%) for each local sample containing more than 20 specimens (treated initially as operational taxonomic units). Characters assessed included mean number of accessory teeth on maxilla I plates, number of anterior reduced parapodia, prostomium length to width proportion, chaetiger number on which first hooks present, number of concentric lines on mandibles and body width (mm). White bars represent juveniles or growing phase; black bars represent specimens grown sufficiently for use for taxonomic purposes.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965102E77E4D95F9A808B4FDCB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583758/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583758	Fig. 4. Relationship between each taxonomic character state and body size (width) in an operational taxonomic unit, EK B. The number of accessory teeth on both plates of maxilla I, chaetiger number on which first hooks present, prostomium length to width proportion, number of anterior reduced parapodia and number of concentric lines on mandibles were plotted against body width in 24 specimens.	Fig. 4. Relationship between each taxonomic character state and body size (width) in an operational taxonomic unit, EK B. The number of accessory teeth on both plates of maxilla I, chaetiger number on which first hooks present, prostomium length to width proportion, number of anterior reduced parapodia and number of concentric lines on mandibles were plotted against body width in 24 specimens.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965102E77E4D95F9A808B4FDCB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583772/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583772	Fig. 11. Lumbrinerides dayi Perkins, 1979, based on specimens from off Soma, in 38–46 m depth. A, dorsal view of anterior end of specimen collected from sandy bottom (38m depth); B, anterior view of parapodium 1; C, anterior view of parapodium 7 on left side; D, anterior view of parapodium 15; E, anterior view of parapodium 20; F, maxillae; G, mandibles; H, hook from a posterior parapodium.	Fig. 11. Lumbrinerides dayi Perkins, 1979, based on specimens from off Soma, in 38–46 m depth. A, dorsal view of anterior end of specimen collected from sandy bottom (38m depth); B, anterior view of parapodium 1; C, anterior view of parapodium 7 on left side; D, anterior view of parapodium 15; E, anterior view of parapodium 20; F, maxillae; G, mandibles; H, hook from a posterior parapodium.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965105E7604EC1FF3309BEFE0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583772/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583772	Fig. 11. Lumbrinerides dayi Perkins, 1979, based on specimens from off Soma, in 38–46 m depth. A, dorsal view of anterior end of specimen collected from sandy bottom (38m depth); B, anterior view of parapodium 1; C, anterior view of parapodium 7 on left side; D, anterior view of parapodium 15; E, anterior view of parapodium 20; F, maxillae; G, mandibles; H, hook from a posterior parapodium.	Fig. 11. Lumbrinerides dayi Perkins, 1979, based on specimens from off Soma, in 38–46 m depth. A, dorsal view of anterior end of specimen collected from sandy bottom (38m depth); B, anterior view of parapodium 1; C, anterior view of parapodium 7 on left side; D, anterior view of parapodium 15; E, anterior view of parapodium 20; F, maxillae; G, mandibles; H, hook from a posterior parapodium.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965105E7604EC1FF3309BEFE0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583774/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583774	Fig. 12. Chaetal distribution pattern in type specimens for Lumbrinerides hayashii Imajima, 1985 and Japanese comparative specimens identified as Lumbrinerides dayi Perkins, 1979 from off Soma, in 38–46 m depth. Numbers of hooks (closed circle) and limbate chaetae (open circle) per parapodium were plotted for each parapodium from the first to the last chaetigers of fragmented specimens.	Fig. 12. Chaetal distribution pattern in type specimens for Lumbrinerides hayashii Imajima, 1985 and Japanese comparative specimens identified as Lumbrinerides dayi Perkins, 1979 from off Soma, in 38–46 m depth. Numbers of hooks (closed circle) and limbate chaetae (open circle) per parapodium were plotted for each parapodium from the first to the last chaetigers of fragmented specimens.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965105E7604EC1FF3309BEFE0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583754/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583754	Fig. 2. Frequency histograms (%) for each local sample containing more than 20 specimens (treated initially as operational taxonomic units). Characters assessed included mean number of accessory teeth on maxilla I plates, number of anterior reduced parapodia, prostomium length to width proportion, chaetiger number on which first hooks present, number of concentric lines on mandibles and body width (mm). White bars represent juveniles or growing phase; black bars represent specimens grown sufficiently for use for taxonomic purposes.	Fig. 2. Frequency histograms (%) for each local sample containing more than 20 specimens (treated initially as operational taxonomic units). Characters assessed included mean number of accessory teeth on maxilla I plates, number of anterior reduced parapodia, prostomium length to width proportion, chaetiger number on which first hooks present, number of concentric lines on mandibles and body width (mm). White bars represent juveniles or growing phase; black bars represent specimens grown sufficiently for use for taxonomic purposes.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D58796511BE7614C52FE5F0AC3FE0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583776/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583776	Fig. 13. Lumbrinerides kristiani sp. nov., paratype (NSMT-Pol P-612: A, B), and holotype (NSMT-Pol H-610: C–J). A, lateral view of anterior end; B, dorsal view of maxillae; C, ventral view of mandibles; D, anterior view of parapodium 1; E, anterior view of Parapodium 5; F, anterior view of parapodium 7; G, anterior view of parapodium 10; H, anterior view of parapodium 18; I, anterior view of parapodium 20; J, anterior view of parapodium 152.	Fig. 13. Lumbrinerides kristiani sp. nov., paratype (NSMT-Pol P-612: A, B), and holotype (NSMT-Pol H-610: C–J). A, lateral view of anterior end; B, dorsal view of maxillae; C, ventral view of mandibles; D, anterior view of parapodium 1; E, anterior view of Parapodium 5; F, anterior view of parapodium 7; G, anterior view of parapodium 10; H, anterior view of parapodium 18; I, anterior view of parapodium 20; J, anterior view of parapodium 152.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D58796511BE7614C52FE5F0AC3FE0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583778/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583778	Fig. 14. Chaetal distribution pattern in Lumbrinerides kristiani sp. nov., holotype (NSMT-Pol H-610), one of paratypes (NSMT-Pol P-611: BW 0.66mm) and non-type materials. Numbers of hooks (closed circles) and limbate chaetae (open circles) per parapodium plotted on each parapodium from first to last chaetigers of fragmented specimens.	Fig. 14. Chaetal distribution pattern in Lumbrinerides kristiani sp. nov., holotype (NSMT-Pol H-610), one of paratypes (NSMT-Pol P-611: BW 0.66mm) and non-type materials. Numbers of hooks (closed circles) and limbate chaetae (open circles) per parapodium plotted on each parapodium from first to last chaetigers of fragmented specimens.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D58796511AE7624C4BFE5F0A04F815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583780/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583780	Fig. 15. Lumbrinerides tamaii sp. nov., paratype (NSMT-Pol P-616, female: A, B, H) and paratype (NSMT-Pol P-615: C–G). A, anterior end, lateral view; B, posterior end, dorsal view; C, maxillae, dorsal view; D, mandibles, ventral view; E, parapodium 1, anterior view; F, parapodium 10, anterior view; G, parapodium 20, anterior view; H, parapodium 19, anterior view.	Fig. 15. Lumbrinerides tamaii sp. nov., paratype (NSMT-Pol P-616, female: A, B, H) and paratype (NSMT-Pol P-615: C–G). A, anterior end, lateral view; B, posterior end, dorsal view; C, maxillae, dorsal view; D, mandibles, ventral view; E, parapodium 1, anterior view; F, parapodium 10, anterior view; G, parapodium 20, anterior view; H, parapodium 19, anterior view.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D58796511AE7624C4BFE5F0A04F815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583790/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583790	Fig. 16. Chaetal distribution pattern in Lumbrinerides tamaii sp. nov. collected from off Tenryu River mouth, holotype (NSMT- Pol H-613), and paratypes (NSMT-Pol P-614). Numbers of hooks (closed circles) and limbate chaetae (open circles) per parapodium plotted on each parapodium from first to last chaetigers of fragmented specimens.	Fig. 16. Chaetal distribution pattern in Lumbrinerides tamaii sp. nov. collected from off Tenryu River mouth, holotype (NSMT- Pol H-613), and paratypes (NSMT-Pol P-614). Numbers of hooks (closed circles) and limbate chaetae (open circles) per parapodium plotted on each parapodium from first to last chaetigers of fragmented specimens.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D58796511AE7624C4BFE5F0A04F815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583786/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583786	Fig. 17. Chaetal distribution pattern in Lumbrinerides tamaii sp. nov. collected from Tosa Bay, paratypes (NSMT-Pol P-615). Numbers of hooks (closed circles) and limbate chaetae (open circles) per parapodium plotted on each parapodium from first to last chaetigers of fragmented specimens.	Fig. 17. Chaetal distribution pattern in Lumbrinerides tamaii sp. nov. collected from Tosa Bay, paratypes (NSMT-Pol P-615). Numbers of hooks (closed circles) and limbate chaetae (open circles) per parapodium plotted on each parapodium from first to last chaetigers of fragmented specimens.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D58796511AE7624C4BFE5F0A04F815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583754/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583754	Fig. 2. Frequency histograms (%) for each local sample containing more than 20 specimens (treated initially as operational taxonomic units). Characters assessed included mean number of accessory teeth on maxilla I plates, number of anterior reduced parapodia, prostomium length to width proportion, chaetiger number on which first hooks present, number of concentric lines on mandibles and body width (mm). White bars represent juveniles or growing phase; black bars represent specimens grown sufficiently for use for taxonomic purposes.	Fig. 2. Frequency histograms (%) for each local sample containing more than 20 specimens (treated initially as operational taxonomic units). Characters assessed included mean number of accessory teeth on maxilla I plates, number of anterior reduced parapodia, prostomium length to width proportion, chaetiger number on which first hooks present, number of concentric lines on mandibles and body width (mm). White bars represent juveniles or growing phase; black bars represent specimens grown sufficiently for use for taxonomic purposes.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965119E7634EB1FBA00D1FF9F9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583792/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583792	Fig. 18. Lumbrinerides yoshioi sp. nov., paratype (NSMT-Pol P-619) A, lateral view of anterior end; B, dorsal view of maxillae; C, ventral view of mandibles; E, anterior view of parapodium 13.	Fig. 18. Lumbrinerides yoshioi sp. nov., paratype (NSMT-Pol P-619) A, lateral view of anterior end; B, dorsal view of maxillae; C, ventral view of mandibles; E, anterior view of parapodium 13.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965119E7634EB1FBA00D1FF9F9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583794/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583794	Fig. 19. Chaetal distribution patterns in Lumbrinerides yoshioi sp. nov collected from off Tomakomai, holotype (NSMT-Pol H-618), and paratypes (NSMT-Pol P-619). Numbers of hooks (closed circles) and limbate chaetae (open circles) per parapodium plotted on each parapodium from first to last chaetigers.	Fig. 19. Chaetal distribution patterns in Lumbrinerides yoshioi sp. nov collected from off Tomakomai, holotype (NSMT-Pol H-618), and paratypes (NSMT-Pol P-619). Numbers of hooks (closed circles) and limbate chaetae (open circles) per parapodium plotted on each parapodium from first to last chaetigers.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
03D587965119E7634EB1FBA00D1FF9F9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4583754/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583754	Fig. 2. Frequency histograms (%) for each local sample containing more than 20 specimens (treated initially as operational taxonomic units). Characters assessed included mean number of accessory teeth on maxilla I plates, number of anterior reduced parapodia, prostomium length to width proportion, chaetiger number on which first hooks present, number of concentric lines on mandibles and body width (mm). White bars represent juveniles or growing phase; black bars represent specimens grown sufficiently for use for taxonomic purposes.	Fig. 2. Frequency histograms (%) for each local sample containing more than 20 specimens (treated initially as operational taxonomic units). Characters assessed included mean number of accessory teeth on maxilla I plates, number of anterior reduced parapodia, prostomium length to width proportion, chaetiger number on which first hooks present, number of concentric lines on mandibles and body width (mm). White bars represent juveniles or growing phase; black bars represent specimens grown sufficiently for use for taxonomic purposes.	2017-05-25	Miura, Tomoyuki		Zenodo	biologists	Miura, Tomoyuki			
