identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
F84087F0FFA6A51C1BB8FAF7AE93FDF6.text	F84087F0FFA6A51C1BB8FAF7AE93FDF6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Onobrychis laconica Orph. ex Boissier 1872	<div><p>Typification of Onobrychis laconica</p> <p>Onobrychis laconica was validly published by Boissier (1872 –1873: 530) through a diagnosis and a description; the habitat and provenance were also provided (“Hab. in siccis regionis subalpinae, mons Malevo Laconiae (Orph), mons Kyllene alt. 6500′ (Heldr!), mons Tymphrestus Aetoliae supra Carpenisi alt. 4000′ (Samar. et Guicc.!)”. Boissier (1872 –1873) reported as synonyms “ O. pulchella Heldr. in Boiss. Diagn. Ser. II, 6, p. 64, non Schrenk” [i.e., O. pulchella Heldreich in Boissier (1859: 64), and “ O. Heldreichii Bge. in litt.” (not validly published according to the Art. 36.1b of ICN). Onobrychis laconica is therefore a replacement name, due to the existence of the previous and legitimate O. pulchella Schrenk in Fischer &amp; Meyer (1841: 87) (Arts. 6.11 and 53.3 of ICN). The type of O. laconica is the same of that of the illegitimate O. pulchella Heldr. in Boiss., non Schrenk (Art. 7.4 of ICN). The latter name was published providing a detailed description, habitat, provenance (“Hab. in pascuis regionis abietinae montis Tymphresti (Veluchi) Eurytaniae supra Carpenitzi alt. 4000′), and a diagnosis, all in Latin language.</p> <p>We traced the following specimens: FI010913, FI010914, JE00010035, MPU021490, MPU022851, P03077995, P02850986, and P02274509 (duplicates are available at G -Boiss and TAU; see Raptis et al. 2019). All the examined specimens bear the following original label, printed but in Heldreich’s handwriting (P02274509 was hand-copied): “De Heldreich Herbarium Graecum Normale | N. 664. Onobrychis pulchella Heldr. nov. sp. | In pascuis reg. abietinae m. Tymphresti Veluchi hod. Eurytaniae, l.d. Rovia, alt. 4000 supra Carpenisi. D. 8 Aug. 1857. Detexerunt am. Samaritani A Guicciardi”. Each one of these specimens is eligible as lectotype. but FI010913 is the best choice, due to its satisfying conservation status and completeness. In fact, it is represented by three individuals, two of them flowering, the remaining one showing mature fruits (very important for diagnostic purposes). The plant is characterized by appressed hairiness, elliptic-linear leaflets, calyx with brownish hairs, corolla twice longer than calyx, legume a little wider than calyx and with 3–4 short teeth, so both agreeing with the protologue (Boissier 1872 –1873) and with the current usage of the name (Ball 1968).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F84087F0FFA6A51C1BB8FAF7AE93FDF6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Guacchio, Emanuele Del;Bernardo, Liliana;Iamonico, Duilio	Guacchio, Emanuele Del, Bernardo, Liliana, Iamonico, Duilio (2021): The chimeric Onobrychis tenoreana (Fabaceae) and lectotypification of the names O. laconica and O. pentelica. Phytotaxa 505 (2): 240-244, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.505.2.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.505.2.11
F84087F0FFA4A51C1BB8F95EAB45FA69.text	F84087F0FFA4A51C1BB8F95EAB45FA69.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Onobrychis tenoreana Lacaita 1911	<div><p>Typification of Onobrychis tenoreana</p> <p>Two interesting Onobrychis specimens, bearing the localities reported Lacaita (1911: 276) in the protologue, are preserved at BM: one from Mt. Finestra (BM000824000) and another one from Mt. Cerealto (= Mt. Cervialto) (without barcode). However, the latter specimen is a syntype extensively reported in the protologue, so that it is to be preferred as lectotype (Art. 9.12 of ICN). Note that the name O. tenoreana does not appear on this sheet and the original Lacaita’s label reports O. alba. However, there is another label (Lacaita’s handwriting) with “ Onobrychis laconica Orph. | momento [= on suggestion by] Handel-Mazzetti | adsentio [= I agree] CCL [= C. C. Lacaita]”. Finally, a identification was also given by Širjaev in 1928 on a further label. This specimen is represented by a flowering and well preserved individual and, on the basis of the calyx length (about the half than corolla) and the colour of the corolla (pinkish), it is identifiable as O. alba subsp. pentelica. According to several field surveys by us on Mt. Finestra and Mt. Cervialto, this is the only occurring taxon of this group.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F84087F0FFA4A51C1BB8F95EAB45FA69	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Guacchio, Emanuele Del;Bernardo, Liliana;Iamonico, Duilio	Guacchio, Emanuele Del, Bernardo, Liliana, Iamonico, Duilio (2021): The chimeric Onobrychis tenoreana (Fabaceae) and lectotypification of the names O. laconica and O. pentelica. Phytotaxa 505 (2): 240-244, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.505.2.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.505.2.11
