identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
038C87CFFFEFFFA7E0A99600A2FCFADC.text	038C87CFFFEFFFA7E0A99600A2FCFADC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cephalotaxus mannii Hook.	<div><p>Cephalotaxus mannii Hook. f. (1886: t. 1523)</p> <p>Lectotype (Step I. Lang et al. (2013). Step II. designated here):— INDIA. Meghalaya: Khasi Hills, Lankhla Woods, July 1885, G. Mann s.n. (K000288019, digital image!; isolectotype CAL447046!) (Fig.1).</p> <p>Residual syntypes:— INDIA. Meghalaya: Khasi Hills, Lankhla Woods, 01 November 1885, G. Mann s.n. (DD!), (CAL 447050!), (K000288007, K000287675, K001325156, digital images!), (A00003307, digital image!), (GH00003308, digital image!), (E00112582, digital image!), (US00012030, digital image!), (P00731282, digital image!), (PH 00004039, digital image!).</p> <p>Distribution:— India (Meghalaya, Nagaland, Manipur), China (Guangdong, Guangxi, Yunnan, Tibet), Northern Myanmar, Laos (Khammouan, Vientiane), Thailand, Vietnam.</p> <p>Notes:— The species is distinguished from C. griffithii by several distinctive morphological characters. Leaves in C. mannii are borne 70º–90º to the branchlets where as it is 30º–45º in case of C. griffithii. Leaves of C. mannii are 1.5– 6 cm long, 2–4 mm wide and in C. grifithii leaves are 4–9 cm long and 4–7 mm wide. One of the main distinguishing character between the two species is the leaf base. Leaf base of C. griffithii is broadly rounded whereas C. mannii leaf have narrow base. Seeds of C. griffithii are 3.5–4.5 cm long and in C. mannii seeds are 1.8–2.8 cm long.</p> <p>Second-step lectotypification:— In the protologue of C. mannii, the provenance was quoted as: “Khasia Mts., in Lankhla woods, about 5,000 ft., Gustav Mann ”. During the study, we have traced out multiple sheets of (thirteen specimens) this homogenous collection (by Gustav Mann) housed at different herbaria. Farjon (2010, 2017) and Lang et al. (2013) considered the specimen at Kew bearing “ 1 November 1885, G. Mann s.n.” as a holotype. Since there was not one specimen or illustration indicated or used by Hooker, there can be no holotype according to Art. 9.1 (Turland et al. 2018). Nor can their use of “ holotype ” be corrected to “ lectotype ” under Art. 9.10, as they did not meet requirements of Art. 7.11 (Art. 9 Note 6), hence, their reference is therefore considered as effective first step lectotypification. So, the specimen selected here to be treated as second step lectotype.</p> <p>Notes on conservation status:— Cephalotaxus mannii is listed as Vulnerable in the IUCN Red List (Liao &amp; Yang 2013). In the eastern Himalayan region of India, populations of C. mannii and C. griffithii are threatened by shifting cultivation and forest fire. In Mizoram state, the timber of C. griffithii is used for house building and making furniture (Bhardwaj &amp; Gakhar 2008). However, in most of the other states in Northeastern India, populations of C. griffithii (Fig. 2A) remained unexplored due to remoteness of location and limited accessibility of the habitat of this species (Moirangthem et al. 2014).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C87CFFFEFFFA7E0A99600A2FCFADC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bisht, Sunita;Khuraijam, Jibankumar Singh;Singh, Rita	Bisht, Sunita, Khuraijam, Jibankumar Singh, Singh, Rita (2021): Revisiting the taxonomy of the names Cephalotaxus mannii and C. griffithii (Taxaceae). Phytotaxa 501 (1): 189-194, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.501.1.10, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.501.1.10
038C87CFFFEDFFA7E0A99643A7D1F9B4.text	038C87CFFFEDFFA7E0A99643A7D1F9B4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cephalotaxus griffithii Hook.	<div><p>Cephalotaxus griffithii Hook. f. (1888: 648) (Fig. 2B)</p> <p>Lectotype (designated by Lang et al., 2013): INDIA. Assam: Mishmi Hill, 1863–1864, W. Griffith 5000 (K000287674, digital image!) isolectotypes GH00003306, B100296990, P00731286, digital images!).</p> <p>Cephalotaxus lanceolata K.M.Feng in Cheng et al. (1975: 86), nom. illeg. non hort. ex Beissner (1901: 73–74 &amp; 117).</p> <p>Cephalotaxus fortunei var. lanceolata (K.M.Feng) Silba (1990: 27).</p> <p>Type: CHINA. Yunnan: Gongshan Dulong County, Dulongjiang Township, elev. 1900 m, 18 June 1959, G. M. Feng 24347 (PE!).</p> <p>Distribution:— India (Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Nagaland, Mizoram), China, Myanmar.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C87CFFFEDFFA7E0A99643A7D1F9B4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bisht, Sunita;Khuraijam, Jibankumar Singh;Singh, Rita	Bisht, Sunita, Khuraijam, Jibankumar Singh, Singh, Rita (2021): Revisiting the taxonomy of the names Cephalotaxus mannii and C. griffithii (Taxaceae). Phytotaxa 501 (1): 189-194, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.501.1.10, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.501.1.10
038C87CFFFEDFFA0E0A995ACA6EFFEB4.text	038C87CFFFEDFFA0E0A995ACA6EFFEB4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cephalotaxus Sieb. & Zucc. ex Endlicher 1842	<div><p>Key to the species of Cephalotaxus</p> <p>1. Leaves borne at 45º–110º to branchlet axis; leaf 1–16 cm long; seed cone peduncle 2–12 mm long; seeds 1.8–2.8 cm long........................................................................................................................................................................................................................2</p> <p>- Leaves borne at 30º–45º to branchlet axis; leaf 4–9 cm long; seed cone peduncle 1.5–2 cm long; seeds 3.5–4.5 cm long............................................................................................................................................................................................................ C. griffithii</p> <p>2. Bark yellow, reddish grey to greyish brown.......................................................................................................................................3</p> <p>- Bark light brown to reddish brown or dark reddish brown................................................................................................................4</p> <p>3. Bark yellow to greyish brown; leaf apex obtuse, shortly cuspidate; base cordate-truncate.................................................. C. oliveri</p> <p>- Bark reddish grey to greyish brown; leaf apex acuminate or slightly acute or abruptly mucronate; base cuneate or rounded cuneate................................................................................................................................................................................................5</p> <p>4. Bark thin, exfoliating in small or large flakes and strips, light brown to reddish brown...................................................................6</p> <p>- Bark thin, exfoliating in strips, reddish brown...................................................................................................................................7</p> <p>5. Leaf apex acuminate or slightly acute; male cones ca. 3 mm in dia........................................................................... C. harringtonii</p> <p>- Leaf apex abruptly mucronate; male cones ca. 6 mm in dia................................................................................................... C. nana</p> <p>6. Leaves borne at 70º–90º to branchlet axis, linear or slightly falcate arranged in to two rows, cuspidate apex................... C. mannii</p> <p>- Leaves borne at 45–80° to branchlet axis, linear and abruptly narrowing to a mucronate apex.................................. C. hainanensis</p> <p>7. Leaves 3.5–5 mm wide; pollen cone pedunculate, 3–7 mm long peduncles; arils have numerous indistinct striations.................................................................................................................................................................................................................. C. fortunei</p> <p>- Leaves 1.5–3.2 mm wide; pollen cone sessile or subsessile, peduncle 0–2 mm long; arils have longitudinal ridges........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ C. alpina</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C87CFFFEDFFA0E0A995ACA6EFFEB4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bisht, Sunita;Khuraijam, Jibankumar Singh;Singh, Rita	Bisht, Sunita, Khuraijam, Jibankumar Singh, Singh, Rita (2021): Revisiting the taxonomy of the names Cephalotaxus mannii and C. griffithii (Taxaceae). Phytotaxa 501 (1): 189-194, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.501.1.10, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.501.1.10
