taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
0396A00EFFC5A9189926FCECFC3FFD94.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5156130/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5156130	Fig. 2. Neanthes goodayi sp. nov., holotype (NHM_739). A. Live image, entire specimen. B. Preserved entire specimen, dorsal view (left), ventral view (right). C. Live image, anterior view, arrows mark pigmentation. D. Preserved specimen, anterior view, arrows mark pigmentation. E. Dissected pharynx, with pharyngeal areas I, II, III, IV, VI, VII–VIII highlighted. Scale bars: B = 1 mm; D = 500 µm; E = 250 µm.	Fig. 2. Neanthes goodayi sp. nov., holotype (NHM_739). A. Live image, entire specimen. B. Preserved entire specimen, dorsal view (left), ventral view (right). C. Live image, anterior view, arrows mark pigmentation. D. Preserved specimen, anterior view, arrows mark pigmentation. E. Dissected pharynx, with pharyngeal areas I, II, III, IV, VI, VII–VIII highlighted. Scale bars: B = 1 mm; D = 500 µm; E = 250 µm.	2021-07-27	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.		Zenodo	biologists	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.			
0396A00EFFC5A9189926FCECFC3FFD94.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5156132/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5156132	Fig. 3. Neanthes goodayi sp. nov., holotype (NHM_739). A. Chaetiger 1, posterior view. B. Chaetiger 3, posterior view.C. Chaetiger 6, posterior view.D. Chaetiger 20, posterior view.E. Chaetiger 29, posterior view. F. Chaetiger 29, posterior view, detail of neuracicular postchaetal lobe. G. Chaetiger 40, posterior view. H. Chaetiger 46, posterior view. I. Notochaetae, detail of homogomph spinigers, chaetiger 20. J. Supraciular neurochaetae, detail of homogomph spiniger, chaetiger 3. K. Supracicular neurochaetae, detail of heterogomph falciger, chaetiger 10. L. Subacicular neurochaetae, detail of homogomph spiniger (left) and homogomph falciger (right), chaetiger 20. M. Subacicular neurochaetae, detail of heterogomph falcigers, chaetiger 20. Abbreviations: PtL = postchaetal lobe; VC = ventral cirrus. Postchaetal lobe in A–D, F outlined with a fine white line. Parapodia in C, E–H dissected from left side of specimen; parapodia in A–B, D dissected from right side of specimen, with images laterally inverted follow direction of other plates. Scale bars: A–E, G–H = 200 µm; F, I–M = 50 µm.	Fig. 3. Neanthes goodayi sp. nov., holotype (NHM_739). A. Chaetiger 1, posterior view. B. Chaetiger 3, posterior view.C. Chaetiger 6, posterior view.D. Chaetiger 20, posterior view.E. Chaetiger 29, posterior view. F. Chaetiger 29, posterior view, detail of neuracicular postchaetal lobe. G. Chaetiger 40, posterior view. H. Chaetiger 46, posterior view. I. Notochaetae, detail of homogomph spinigers, chaetiger 20. J. Supraciular neurochaetae, detail of homogomph spiniger, chaetiger 3. K. Supracicular neurochaetae, detail of heterogomph falciger, chaetiger 10. L. Subacicular neurochaetae, detail of homogomph spiniger (left) and homogomph falciger (right), chaetiger 20. M. Subacicular neurochaetae, detail of heterogomph falcigers, chaetiger 20. Abbreviations: PtL = postchaetal lobe; VC = ventral cirrus. Postchaetal lobe in A–D, F outlined with a fine white line. Parapodia in C, E–H dissected from left side of specimen; parapodia in A–B, D dissected from right side of specimen, with images laterally inverted follow direction of other plates. Scale bars: A–E, G–H = 200 µm; F, I–M = 50 µm.	2021-07-27	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.		Zenodo	biologists	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.			
0396A00EFFC5A9189926FCECFC3FFD94.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5156134/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5156134	Fig. 4. Neanthes goodayi sp. nov., paratypes. A. Paratype (NHM_1624), preserved specimen; dorsal anterior view, live image (left); lateral anterior view, preserved specimen (right). B. Paratype (NHM_755); dorsal anterior view, live image (left), preserved specimen (right); arrows marking pigmentation. C. Paratype (NHM_238), dorsal anterior view, arrows mark pigmentation. D. Paratype (NHM_512), dorsal anterior view, arrows mark pigmentation. Scale bars = 1 mm.	Fig. 4. Neanthes goodayi sp. nov., paratypes. A. Paratype (NHM_1624), preserved specimen; dorsal anterior view, live image (left); lateral anterior view, preserved specimen (right). B. Paratype (NHM_755); dorsal anterior view, live image (left), preserved specimen (right); arrows marking pigmentation. C. Paratype (NHM_238), dorsal anterior view, arrows mark pigmentation. D. Paratype (NHM_512), dorsal anterior view, arrows mark pigmentation. Scale bars = 1 mm.	2021-07-27	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.		Zenodo	biologists	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.			
0396A00EFFC5A9189926FCECFC3FFD94.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5156136/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5156136	Fig. 5. Neanthes goodayi sp. nov., juvenile specimens. A. Paratype (1254), entire specimen, dorsal view. B. Paratype (NHM_171) dorsal anterior view. C. Paratype (NHM_127) entire specimen, dorsal view. D. Paratype (NHM_127), close up of dorsal anterior, arrows mark position of anterior eye pair. Scale bars: A, C = 1 mm; B = 500 µm; D = 100 µm.	Fig. 5. Neanthes goodayi sp. nov., juvenile specimens. A. Paratype (1254), entire specimen, dorsal view. B. Paratype (NHM_171) dorsal anterior view. C. Paratype (NHM_127) entire specimen, dorsal view. D. Paratype (NHM_127), close up of dorsal anterior, arrows mark position of anterior eye pair. Scale bars: A, C = 1 mm; B = 500 µm; D = 100 µm.	2021-07-27	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.		Zenodo	biologists	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.			
0396A00EFFC5A9189926FCECFC3FFD94.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5156140/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5156140	Fig. 6. Neanthes goodayi sp. nov., epitoke paratype (NHM_1783), preserved specimen. A. Entire specimen, dorsal view. B. Extruded pharynx, dorsal view (left), ventral view (right). C. Detail of prenatatory parapodium 4, with modified dorsal and ventral cirri, posterior view. D. Detail of modified natatory swimming parapodium, chaetiger 31, posterior view. E. Detail of papillated dorsal cirrus, chaetiger 31, posterior view. F. Modified swimming spinigers, subacicular neurocheatal fascicle, chaetiger 32. Abbreviations: DC = dorsal cirrus; VC = ventral cirrus. Lobe at base of dorsal cirrus in D and E outlined with a fine white or black line. Parapodium in C dissected from left side of specimen; parapodium in D dissected from right side of specimen, with images D and E laterally inverted to follow direction of other plates. Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B = 500 µm; C–D = 200 µm; E = 100 µm; F = 50 µm.	Fig. 6. Neanthes goodayi sp. nov., epitoke paratype (NHM_1783), preserved specimen. A. Entire specimen, dorsal view. B. Extruded pharynx, dorsal view (left), ventral view (right). C. Detail of prenatatory parapodium 4, with modified dorsal and ventral cirri, posterior view. D. Detail of modified natatory swimming parapodium, chaetiger 31, posterior view. E. Detail of papillated dorsal cirrus, chaetiger 31, posterior view. F. Modified swimming spinigers, subacicular neurocheatal fascicle, chaetiger 32. Abbreviations: DC = dorsal cirrus; VC = ventral cirrus. Lobe at base of dorsal cirrus in D and E outlined with a fine white or black line. Parapodium in C dissected from left side of specimen; parapodium in D dissected from right side of specimen, with images D and E laterally inverted to follow direction of other plates. Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B = 500 µm; C–D = 200 µm; E = 100 µm; F = 50 µm.	2021-07-27	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.		Zenodo	biologists	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.			
0396A00EFFC5A9189926FCECFC3FFD94.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5156146/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5156146	Fig. 8. Neanthes goodayi sp. nov., live specimens, in situ images. A. Paratype (NHM_2026), burrowing within nodule crevice. B. Detail of paratype (NHM_2026), in burrow. C. Paratype (NHM_512), burrowing within a foraminiferan growing on nodule. D–E. Detail of paratype (NHM_512), in burrow. F. Detail of paratype (NHM_1624), burrowing within a mudball encrusting the nodule surface. G–H. Details of paratype (NHM_1624), in burrow. Scale bars: 1 cm.	Fig. 8. Neanthes goodayi sp. nov., live specimens, in situ images. A. Paratype (NHM_2026), burrowing within nodule crevice. B. Detail of paratype (NHM_2026), in burrow. C. Paratype (NHM_512), burrowing within a foraminiferan growing on nodule. D–E. Detail of paratype (NHM_512), in burrow. F. Detail of paratype (NHM_1624), burrowing within a mudball encrusting the nodule surface. G–H. Details of paratype (NHM_1624), in burrow. Scale bars: 1 cm.	2021-07-27	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.		Zenodo	biologists	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.			
0396A00EFFC5A9189926FCECFC3FFD94.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5156142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5156142	Fig. 7. Phylogenetic analysis of Nereididae Blainville, 1818, 50% majority rule tree from the Bayesian analyses using 18S, 16S and COI, with posterior probability values on nodes. Forty-five taxa from GenBank were included, using three taxa from another family within Nereidiformia, Hesionidae Grube, 1850, as outgroup.	Fig. 7. Phylogenetic analysis of Nereididae Blainville, 1818, 50% majority rule tree from the Bayesian analyses using 18S, 16S and COI, with posterior probability values on nodes. Forty-five taxa from GenBank were included, using three taxa from another family within Nereidiformia, Hesionidae Grube, 1850, as outgroup.	2021-07-27	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.		Zenodo	biologists	Drennan, Regan;Wiklund, Helena;Rabone, Muriel;Georgieva, Magdalena N.;Dahlgren, Thomas G.;Glover, Adrian G.			
