identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03CD87A2FF9FFFD2FF66A6ABC56BA2B9.text	03CD87A2FF9FFFD2FF66A6ABC56BA2B9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirridae Nogueira, Fitzhugh & Hutchings 2013	<div><p>Family Polycirridae Nogueira, Fitzhugh &amp; Hutchings, 2013</p> <p>Polycirrinae Malmgren, 1866: 390.</p> <p>Polycirrinae Hessle, 1917: 219.</p> <p>Polycirridae Nogueira, Fitzhugh &amp; Hutchings, 2013: 235–236.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Abranchiate Terebellida; expanded circular upper lip that may be folded into three lobes (= trilobed or trefoiled) carrying two or three types of tentacles; segment 2 distinctly narrower than adjacent segments; paired ventro-lateral pads (= shields) present.</p> <p>Remarks. The subfamily Polycirrinae was erected by Malmgren (1866) to include Polycirrus Grube, 1850 and four other genera described by him in the same paper: Amaea (now Amaeana), Ereutho, Leucariste, and Lysilla. Since then Hauchiella Levinsen, 1893, Enoplobranchus Webster, 1879, and Biremis Polloni et al., 1973 have been added to the subfamily (Webster 1879; Hessle 1917). Today, six of the eight genera are still recognised, with Ereutho and Leucariste having been relegated to synonymy with Polycirrus (Hessle 1917; Holthe 1986b:146). The subfamily was elevated to family level in the cladistic analysis of terebellomorphs by Nogueira et al. (2013).</p> <p>Polycirrinae was found to be monophyletic by Glasby et al. (2004), supported by four synapomorphies, viz. loss of branchiae; trilobed upper lip; secondary notochaetae pinnate (some taxa only); and anterior venter with prominent paired lateral pads. Garraffoni &amp; Lana (2008) also found in favour of a monophyletic Polycirridae with two synapomorphies that were essentially the same as the earlier study (prostomium with lateral expansion and ventral pads lower than the lateral pad), and two new ones (shape of the adult uncini and tube absent). In the most recent cladistic analysis of the group, Nogueira et al. (2013) confirmed the family’s monophyly and the presence of paired ventral shields as an unequivocal synapomorphy. The only other unequivocal synapomorphy in their dataset was segment 2 being distinctly narrower than adjacent segments.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF9FFFD2FF66A6ABC56BA2B9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FF9EFFCFFF66A2A2C39FA7BA.text	03CD87A2FF9EFFCFFF66A2A2C39FA7BA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus Grube 1850	<div><p>Polycirrus Grube, 1850</p> <p>Aphlebine Quatrefages in Milne Edwards, 1844: 18.</p> <p>Torquea Leidy, 1855: 146.</p> <p>Apneumea Quatrefages, 1865: 380.</p> <p>Ereutho Malmgren, 1866: 391.</p> <p>Leucariste Malmgren, 1866: 390.</p> <p>Cyaxares Kinberg, 1867: 348.</p> <p>Dejoces Kinberg, 1867: 348.</p> <p>Anisocirrus Gravier, 1905: 437.</p> <p>Pseudoampharete Hartmann-Schröder, 1960: 39–41.</p> <p>Litancyra Hutchings, 1977: 9.</p> <p>Type species: Polycirrus medusa Grube, 1850 by monotypy. Type considered lost and neotype designated herein.</p> <p>Type locality. France, Villa Franca, Mediterranean Sea, 43˚47ʹ11.24ʺ N, 7˚36ʹ26.11ʺ E. (see treatment of P. medusa for neotype locality).</p> <p>Diagnosis. Polycirridae with an expanded, often trilobed, upper lip bearing tentacles of two or three kinds. Outer lower lip enlarged and resembling a ventral pad. Notopodia from segment 3 continuing for 10–70 segments; neuropodia from segment 7–18, continuing to pygidium. Notochaetae capillaries of various types including smooth, hirsute, and pinnate (= spinose or corn-eared), present in anterior body only. Neurochaetae avicular uncini, present in anterior and/or posterior body. Five or more pairs of nephridia (segmental organs) in anterior segments opening through pre-gular nephridial papillae (segments 3 and 4) and post-gular nephridial papillae (segment 5 onward).</p> <p>Remarks. The diagnosis is modified from Holthe (1986b) and Hutchings &amp; Glasby (1986). The genus was shown not to be monophyletic in Nogueira et al. (2013).</p> <p>Key to the valid world species of Polycirrus</p> <p>(Region of type locality indicated after species name; P. mexicanus appears twice in the key because of the uncertainty over the starting position of its neuropodia.)</p> <p>1(0). Neurochaetae beginning well before last notochaetigerous segment.............................................. 2 Neurochaetae beginning on or about (within one or two segments of) last notochaetigerous segment................... 29 Neurochaetae beginning well after last notochaetigerous segment.............................................. 47</p> <p>2(1). 18 or fewer notochaetigerous segments.................................................................... 3 19–21 notochaetigerous segments........................................................................ 13 22 or more notochaetigerous segments.................................................................... 14</p> <p>3(2). Uncini of posterior body with long neck and concave base (Type 2; Fig. 3g)....................................... 4 Uncini of posterior body with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1; Fig. 3 e,f)............................. 9</p> <p>4(3). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 12 or earlier; mid-ventral groove from segment 2 or 3........................... 5 Neurochaetae beginning on segment 13–16; mid-ventral groove from segment 4 or 5................... P. medius (Japan) 5(4). Notochaetae hirsute (Fig. 3c); ventral pads incised........................................ P. porcatus (S Australia) Notochaetae pinnate (Fig. 3d); ventral pads more-or-less smooth................................................ 6</p> <p>6(5). Outer lower lip subconical lobe protruding above venter....................................................... 7 Outer lower lip flat, shield-like........................................................................... 8</p> <p>7(6). Ventro-lateral pads well defined, segmentally discrete (e.g. Fig. 1a, b)......................... P. abrolhensis (N Brazil) Ventro-lateral pads poorly defined (e.g. Fig. 1c, d)............................................. P. clavatus (Brazil)</p> <p>8(6). Anterior body uncini atypical Type 2 (almost flat base and smaller in size than those of posterior body)..................................................................................................... P. holthei (Caribbean) All uncini typical Type 2.............................................................. P. pumilis (E Australia)</p> <p>9(3). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 12 or earlier; outer lower lip flat, shield-like.................................. 10 Neurochaetae beginning on segment 13–16; outer lower lip subconical lobe protruding above venter..................................................................................................... P. nephrosus (E Australia)</p> <p>10(9). Notopodia with lobes distally flared; notochaetae hirsute.............................. P. kerguelensis (Kerguelen Is.) Notopodia with prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform; notochaetae smooth or hirsute...................... 11 Notopodia with lobes triangular; notochaetae smooth (narrowly winged)...................... P. denticulatus (N France)</p> <p>11(10). 10 notochaetigerous segments............................................................ P. rosea (E Australia) 14–20 notochaetigerous segments....................................................................... 12</p> <p>12(11). Lower lip longer than wide; uncini with 1–4 teeth above main fang............................ P. norvegicus (Norway) Lower lip wider than long; uncini with 11–15 teeth above main fang...................... P. elisabethae (Scotland, UK)</p> <p>13(2). Notochaetae smooth (may be narrowly winged).......................................... P. fedorovi (Arctic Ocean) Notochaetae pinnate................................................................ P. eous (Sea of Okhotsk)</p> <p>14(2). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 12 or earlier........................................................... 15 Neurochaetae beginning on segment 13–16................................................................ 26</p> <p>15(14). Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2); notochaetae pinnate.......................... P. twisti (Suez Canal) Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1); notochaetae smooth, narrowly winged, or hirsute........... 16</p> <p>16(15). Notopodial prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform; uncini with subrostral process present or absent............ 17 Notopodial lobes both similar, low and rounded; uncini with subrostral process present as a low protuberance........... 24 Notopodial lobes triangular; uncini with subrostral process absent.............................................. 25</p> <p>17(16). Ventro-lateral pads more-or-less smooth (e.g. Fig. 1a)........................................................ 18 Ventro-lateral pads incised, forming corrugations or grooves (e.g. Fig. 1b, c)...................................... 22</p> <p>18(17). Dorsum anteriorly smooth............................................................................. 19 Dorsum anteriorly papillose, ridged, or tessellated........................................................... 20</p> <p>19(18). Notopodia digitiform; uncini lacking subrostral process.................................. P. coibensis n.sp. (Panama) Notopodia more-or-less rectangular; uncini with subrostral process as low protuberance.......... P. swakopianus (Namibia)</p> <p>20(18). Upper lip with well-developed medial lobe, no lateral lobes; mid-ventral groove from segment 4–5..................................................................................................... P. californicus (California) Upper lip trefoiled (well-developed medial and lateral lobes); mid-ventral groove from segment 2–3.................. 21</p> <p>21(20). Neuropodial tori ridge-like; uncini with subrostral process present as low protuberance................ P. chilensis (Chile) Neuropodial tori erect pinnules; uncini lacking subrostral process...................... P. hamiltoni (Macquarie Island)</p> <p>22(17). Outer lower lip oblong, longer than wide............................................... P. arenivorus (N France) Outer lower lip inverted T-shaped..................................................... P. perplexus (California) Outer lower lip subtriangular and pointing toward mouth..................................................... 23</p> <p>23(22). Upper lip trefoiled (well-developed medial and lateral lobes); neuropodial tori erect pinnules........ P. dubius (N Carolina) Upper lip with well-developed medial lobe, no lateral lobes; neuropodial tori ridge-like............ P. luminosus (Bermuda) 24(16). Notochaetae one type only, faintly hirsute............................................. P. phosphoreus (E Canada) Notochaetae of two types, hirsute and pinnate.......................................... P. carolinensis (N Carolina)</p> <p>25(16). Outer lower lip grooved, oblong, wider than long; dorsum anteriorly smooth.................... P. tentaculatus (N Peru) Outer lower lip tessellated, subtriangular, and pointing toward mouth; dorsum anteriorly tessellated..................................................................................................... P. multisetigerous (Chile)</p> <p>26(14). Notochaetae smooth or hirsute; notopodia more-or-less rectangular; neuropodial tori ridge-like....................... 27 Notochaetae pinnate; notopodia digitiform; neuropodial tori erect pinnules...................... P. multus (Hong Kong)</p> <p>27(26). Uncini lacking subrostral process....................................................... P.purpureus (Jamaica) Uncini with subrostral process present as a low rounded protruberance.......................................... 28</p> <p>28(27). Uncini with enlarged median tooth plus smaller teeth above main fang......................... P. aurantiacus (France) Uncini with 2 rows of smaller teeth above main fang.......................................... P. nervosus (Japan)</p> <p>29(1). Neurochaetae begin on segment 12 or earlier................................................. P. paivai (N Brazil) Neurochaetae begin on segment 13 to 16.................................................................. 30 Neurochaetae begin on segment 17 or later................................................................ 42</p> <p>30(29). Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2)........................................................... 31 Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1)................................................... 34</p> <p>31(30). Notochaetae smooth, narrowly winged, or hirsute; outer lower lip flat, shield-like; inner lower lip divided into two equal lobes................................................................................ P. quadratus (Hong Kong) Notochaetae pinnate; outer lower lip subconical lobe protruding above venter; inner lower lip otherwise................ 32</p> <p>32(31). Notopodial prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform; teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series... 33 Notopodial pre- and post-chaetal lobes both similar, low and rounded; teeth above main fang arranged in single transverse series........................................................................... P. disjunctus (E Australia)</p> <p>33(32). Oral surface of upper lip without grooves leading to mouth; poorly defined ventro-lateral pads........................................................................................................ P. boholensis (Philippines) Oral surface of upper lip glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth; discrete ventro-lateral pads present............................................................................................ P. glaucus (W Australia)</p> <p>34(30). Outer lower lip oblong, wider than long.................................................................. 35 Outer lower lip subtriangular and pointing toward mouth..................................................... 39 Outer lower lip inverted T-shaped...................................................... P. hesslei (Subantarctic)</p> <p>35(34). Notochaetae include both smooth, narrowly winged and pinnate types in each notopodium...... P. decipiens (Gulf of Aden) Notochaeta all of one type, of various degrees of hirsuteness................................................. 36</p> <p>36(35). Oral surface of upper lip without grooves leading to mouth; notochaetae within a chaetiger of two distinct lengths........ 37 Oral surface of upper lip with grooves leading to mouth; notochaetae within a chaetiger graded long from dorsal to ventral..................................................................................................... 38</p> <p>37(36). Upper lip trefoiled (well-developed medial and lateral lobes); discrete ventro-lateral pads present....................................................................................................... P.antarcticus (Antarctic) Upper lip with medial lobe only, well developed; poorly defined ventro-lateral pads.............. P. dodeka (Hong Kong)</p> <p>38(36). Dorsum anteriorly smooth; neuropodial tori ridge like.................... P. macintoshi replacement name (Kerguelen Is) Dorsum anteriorly tessellated; neuropodial tori erect pinnules........................... P. latidens (Skagerrak, Europe)</p> <p>39(34). Upper lip with medial lobe only, well developed; notopodia digitiform.......................................... 40 Upper lip trefoiled (well-developed medial and lateral lobes); notopodia more-or-less rectangular.................... 41</p> <p>40(39). 17–18 notochaetigerous segments; pre-gular nephridial papillae present (on segments 3, 4)....... P. arcticus (Arctic Ocean) 11–14 notochaetigerous segments; pre-gular nephridial papillae absent............................. P. nonatoi (Brazil)</p> <p>41(39). Ventro-lateral pads corrugated (Fig. 1c); subrostral process of uncini as sharp protuberance.... P. broomensis (NW Australia) Ventro-lateral pads smooth; subrostral process of uncini low and rounded..................... P. breviuncinatus (Brazil)</p> <p>42(29). Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2); notochaetae comprise only pinnate types......................... 43 Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1); notochaetae comprise only smooth (winged) types, or both smooth and pinnate types.............................................................................. 44</p> <p>43(42). Up to 18 notochaetigerous segments; lower lip (outer region) subconical lobe protruding above venter............................................................................................... P. aquila (Malay Archipelago) Notochaetigerous segments 19 to 21; lower lip (outer region) flat, shield-like..................... P. coccineus (Red Sea)</p> <p>44(42). Outer lower lip subconical lobe protruding above venter...................................... P. plumosus (Norway) Outer lower lip flat, shield-like.......................................................................... 45</p> <p>45(44). Uncini with subrostral process present as low protuberance.................................................. 46 Uncini lacking subrostral process............................................... P. variabilis (Great Barrier Reef)</p> <p>46(45). Uncini with a single tooth above main fang....................................... P. mexicanus, in part (W Mexico) Uncini with two rows of teeth above main fang, terminal row comprising 7–9 teeth....... P. bicrinalis (Great Barrier Reef)</p> <p>47(1). Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2); subrostral process absent...................................... 48 Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1); subrostral process present as low protuberance............. 49</p> <p>48(47). Neurochaetae begin on segment 13–16; teeth above main fang arranged in single transverse series...................................................................................................... P. paucidens (S Australia) Neurochaetae begin on segment 17 or later; teeth above main fang arranged in multiple series...... P. octosetus (E Australia)</p> <p>49(47). Notochaetae include both smooth and pinnate types......................................................... 50 Notochaetae are all more or less smooth (includes minutely hirsute and narrowly winged types)...................... 51</p> <p>50(49). Outer lower lip oblong, wider than long; uncini with a single tooth above the main fang.... P. mexicanus, in part (W Mexico) Outer lower lip subtriangular and pointing toward mouth; uncini with a transverse row of teeth above main fang......... 52</p> <p>51(49). Ventro-lateral pads more or less smooth; midventral groove well defined..................... P. medusa (Mediterranean) Ventro-lateral pads papillated; midventral groove narrow, poorly defined due to encroachment of papillae.................................................................................................... P. papillosus (Brazil)</p> <p>52(50). Ventro-lateral pads more or less smooth, on segments 3–9................................. P. parvus (NW Australia) Ventro-lateral pads tessellated, on segments 3–15........................................ P. tesselatus (S Australia)</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF9EFFCFFF66A2A2C39FA7BA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FF83FFCEFF66A7A2C20CA106.text	03CD87A2FF83FFCEFF66A7A2C20CA106.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus abrolhensis Garraffoni & Costa 2003	<div><p>Polycirrus abrolhensis Garraffoni &amp; Costa, 2003</p> <p>Fig. 4a–d</p> <p>Polycirrus abrolhensis Garraffoni &amp; Costa, 2003: 3–5, figs 1–4.</p> <p>Type locality. Brazil, Abrolhos Archipelago.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Type material. HOLOTYPE: Brazil, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-38.71139&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-17.97889" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -38.71139/lat -17.97889)">Abrolhos Archipelago</a>, 17°58ʹ44ʺ S, 38°42ʹ41ʺ W, 10 m, associated with calcareous algae, IBUFRJ-0481. PARATYPES: all from Abrolhos Archipelago, IBUFRJ-0482 (16 specimens), IBUFRJ-0483 (5 specimens), MCEM-1303 (1 specimen).</p> <p>Description. Holotype complete, 28 mm long, 0.55 mm wide for about 25 segments. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 3 (Fig. 4a). Mid-ventral groove from segment 3.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles one type, cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved (some apparently missing), arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Upper lip prominent medial lobe with slight lateral expansions at base; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Outer lower lip subconical lobe protruding above venter, smooth (Fig. 4a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 15, extending to segment 17. Notopodia digitiform, lobes distally flared, postchaetal lobe equal long to prechaetal (Fig. 4c). Notochaetae within a chaetiger one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, pinnate (Fig. 4b), posteriorly same form as those anteriorly. Neurochaetae beginning on segment 7, about 6–8 uncini per row. Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2); posterior ones about three times larger than anterior ones; teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:8–10), enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process absent (Fig. 4d).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segment 4 only. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segments 5–12; situated at ventral base of notopodia (Fig. 4a).</p> <p>Comments. Polycirrus abrolhensis is similar to P. clavatus (Kinberg, 1867), which was described from the northeast coast of Brazil at 9°S in 33 m (18 fms). The two species appear to be differentiable based on the form of the ventro-lateral pads (discrete in P. abrolhensis; poorly defined in P. clavatus) and the distribution of nephridial papillae (on segment 4 only on P. abrolhensis; segments 3 and 4 on P. clavatus). Garraffoni &amp; Costa (2003) did not compare their species with P. clavatus, which is only very briefly described by Kinberg (1867). The redescription of P. clavatus in this study clarifies the attributes of this poorly known species.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF83FFCEFF66A7A2C20CA106	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FF81FFCDFF66A3CAC46CA528.text	03CD87A2FF81FFCDFF66A3CAC46CA528.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus antarcticus (Willey 1902)	<div><p>Polycirrus antarcticus (Willey, 1902)</p> <p>Fig. 5a–e</p> <p>Ereutho antarcticus Willey, 1902: 281, Pl. XLII., fig. 6, pl.XLVI, fig. 6.</p> <p>Polycirrus insignis Gravier, 1907: 54–56, figs 35, 36. New synonym.</p> <p>Type locality. Antarctica, Cape Adare.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: Antarctica, Cape Adare, coll. 25.i.1900, washed up after a gale, BMNH 1902:1.8.18, 71°17′ S, 170°14′ E.</p> <p>HOLOTYPE: Polycirrus insignis A 229, MNHN 1542, Expedition Charcot, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=135.91667&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-66.25" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 135.91667/lat -66.25)">Port Charcot</a>, 40 m, coll. 1903–1905, id. 1906, 66°15'S 135°55'E.</p> <p>Description. Based on holotypes of E. antarcticus and P. insignis. Holotype of E. antarcticus incomplete, 23 chaetigers, 15 mm long, 2.5 mm wide; mature female (from Willey 1902); original description does not mention any damage but some body wall damage now present. Holotype of P. insignis complete, 36 chaetigers, 25 mm long (Fig. 5a, b).</p> <p>Venter with anterior mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 3 to 10; mid-ventral groove from segment 4 (Fig. 5c).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of one type (most are missing), cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, not extending laterally. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral blindly ending enclosed diverticulae (lateral lobes not as large as medial lobe), margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip oblong; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, tessellated, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 5c, d).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 11 (10 on one side), extending to segment 13. Notopodia digitiform, lobes both similar, low and rounded (Fig. 5c). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetigers 5 and 10 examined; most chaetae damaged), of two distinct lengths, smooth, narrowly winged (some hirsute at tip as a result of wear), subdistally slightly expanded), posteriorly same form as those anteriorly with blades more striated (Fig. 5e); posterior notochaetae damaged and not illustrated.</p> <p>Neurochaetae beginning on segment 16. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), single tooth above main fang (in holotypes of both E. antarcticus and P. insignis) or teeth arranged in double transverse series (from type description), subrostral process absent (from type description) or present as low protuberance (observed in holotypes).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not observed.</p> <p>Comments. We have synonymised P. insignis Gravier, 1907 with P. antarcticus (Willey, 1902) after finding no significant differences between the holotypes of both species. In particular, there are no differences in the number of notochaetigerous segments (11 in both species) and minimal difference in the segment having the first neurochaetae (segment 16 in P. antarcticus, segment 14 in P. insignis), which is acceptable intraspecific variability for the genus (see Table 1).</p> <p>Interestingly, Hessle (1917), Benham (1921), and Holthe (1986b) all considered that P. antarcticus might also be a synonym of E. kerguelensis McIntosh, 1885 (now Polycirrus kerguelensis). However we reject this synonymy since there are significant differences between the two taxa, including the first occurrence of neurochaetae (segment 16 in P. antarcticus, segment 6 in P. kerguelensis) and the form of the notochaetae which are smooth in P. antarcticus and hirsute in P. kerguelensis.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF81FFCDFF66A3CAC46CA528	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FF81FFCAFF66A5D0C5A9A2D0.text	03CD87A2FF81FFCAFF66A5D0C5A9A2D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus aquila Caullery 1944	<div><p>Polycirrus aquila Caullery, 1944</p> <p>Fig. 6a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus (Ereutho) aquila Caullery, 1944: 192–93, fig.152.</p> <p>Polycirrus aquila Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986: 333.</p> <p>Type locality. Banda Sea, Indonesia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: ZMA V pol 1532, Indonesia, Banda Sea, Siboga Expedition St. 240, 8˚48.7′ S 115˚39.5′ E, 9–36 m, coll. 22.iii.1899.</p> <p>Description. Holotype well preserved with body wall intact but most chaetae damaged; body yellowish in colour, 12 mm long and 1.5 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, complete with approximately 60 segments. Posterior body more compact and muscular than anterior body, sharply tapered near tail end. Sex male.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth with thin body wall. Venter with anterior mid-ventral groove from segment 2 (Fig. 6a) and poorly defined ventro-lateral pads; pads tessellated.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles detached from body, of two types, (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, and weakly grooved, both types arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral, blindly ending, enclosed diverticulae; three lobes similar in size, anterior one subtriangular, lateral ones covered in small tubercles; margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip circular (hidden by upper lip), smooth; subconical lobe of outer region protruding above venter, smooth. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured ventrally (Fig. 6a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 16, extending to segment 18. Notopodial prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, postchaetal lobe longer than prechaetal (Fig. 6b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetiger 2 examined), gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, pinnate (Fig. 6c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 17. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, similar along body. Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2), teeth above main fang arranged in single transverse series (MF: 4) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process absent (Fig. 6d, e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular, increasing in size posteriorly. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3–4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segments 5–16; situated at anterior base of notopodia. Pygidium small, simple, rosette.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF81FFCAFF66A5D0C5A9A2D0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FF86FFC8FF66A148C336A167.text	03CD87A2FF86FFC8FF66A148C336A167.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus arcticus Sars 1865	<div><p>Polycirrus arcticus Sars, 1865</p> <p>Fig. 7a–f</p> <p>Polycirrus arcticus Sars, 1865: 14; Holthe, 1986b: 147–148.</p> <p>Leucariste albicans Malmgren, 1865: 390–391.</p> <p>Type locality. Vadsø, Norway.</p> <p>Material examined. SYNTYPES of Polycirrus articus ZMO C3204 Norway, Vadsø, lg. Danielsen. SYNTYPES of Polycirrus albicans SMNH 1131 ‘ Spetsb Naygatia’, 182 m (100 fms), A.J. Malmgren SMNH 6741; 1127 ‘ Spetsb Crassob’, 91 m (50 fms), ‘ Goes et Smitt’ SMNH 6743; 1124 ‘ Spetsb Wydels’, 73 m (40 fms), 1126 ‘ Goes et Smitt’ SMNH 6738 (designated here as LECTOTYPE); 1125 ‘ Spetsb Wahlenb’, 92 m (50 fms), A.J. Malmgren SMNH 6737; ZMO C1536 ‘ Kingsbay Spitzbergen, Lerbund’ 220 m (120 fms), viii.1861 (all places on the island of Spitsbergen, Svalbard Archipelago, Norway, Arctic Ocean).</p> <p>Description. Syntypes of P. articus in poor condition, consisting of several complete specimens up to 30 mm long and 2 mm wide, colourless, virtually impossible to count number of chaetigers as segmentation indistinct, notopodia and neuropodia small and indistinct, ventral pads not differentiated. Following description based upon P. albicans (SMNH 6738) which consists of six individuals, the largest and best preserved specimen is described in detail and designated the lectotype; the other five lots (SMNH 6741, SMNH 6743, SMNH 6738, SMNH 6737 and ZMO C1536) are designated as paralectotypes. Lectotype pale cream in colour, 30 mm long and 2.5 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, complete with about 46 segments. Sex male.</p> <p>Body consists of 46–47 segments, 30–35 mm long. Body transparent, red nephridia and intestine visible through body wall according to Sars. Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and poorly defined narrow ventro-lateral pads which are longer than wide; pads more-or-less smooth. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, and weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, not extending laterally. Upper lip comprising single (medial) lobe only (folded, semicircular in shape), margin of lobe straight; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong (narrow), smooth; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular, and pointing toward mouth, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 7a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 17 or18, extending to segment 19 or 20. Notopodia digitiform (conical with 7–8 capillaries according to Sars), lobes both similar, low and rounded (Fig. 7b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger one type (chaetiger 3 and midbody chaetiger examined), two distinct lengths, smooth, narrowly winged, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (although fewer) (Fig. 7c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 16. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (Sars records only one small tooth above one larger tooth), enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low protuberance (Fig. 7d–f).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3 and 4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segments 5–14, situated at base of notopodia. Pygidium simple, short rosette.</p> <p>Comments. Based on a comparison of the syntypes of both P. arcticus and P. albicans, both of which were examined, we confirm Holthe’s (1986b) view that P. albicans is a junior synonym of P. arcticus. The only differences between the two species are that P. albicans has a slightly tessellated anterior dorsum (smooth in P. arcticus), the number of notochaetigerous segments is 17 or 18 in P. arcticus (18 in P. albicans), neurochaetae begin on segment 16 in P. arcticus (15 in P. albicans), the number of post-gular membrane nephridial papillae (14 in P. arcticus; 6 in P. albicans). The differences in the number of nephridial papillae may be related to the sexual maturity of the specimen. The chaetal differences are not considered sufficient to regard them as two distinct species (see Table 1 for typical intraspecific variability ranges in the number of notochaetigerous segments and start of neurochaetae). Holthe (1986b) reports a range of 15–22 notochaetigerous segments for P. arcticus. Although Sars mentions 17 or 18 notochaetigerous segments in the type description, his illustration only shows 14.</p> <p>Because the syntype specimens of P. arcticus are all in poor condition we have not designated a lectotype. Instead we have designated a lectotype from among the syntype series of P. albicans, and described and illustrated this specimen. The type locality of P. albicans was given as ‘ Spetsbergia’, which is now known as Spitsbergen. It is in the Arctic Circle about 1000 km to the NW of Vadsø, northern Norway, the type locality of P. arcticus.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF86FFC8FF66A148C336A167	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FF84FFC8FF66A19FC329A463.text	03CD87A2FF84FFC8FF66A19FC329A463.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus arenivorus Caullery 1915	<div><p>Polycirrus arenivorus Caullery, 1915</p> <p>Fig. 8a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus (Leucariste) arenivorus Caullery, 1915: 244–248, fig.1–2.</p> <p>Type locality. Anse, France.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE?: MNHN 1546, France, Anse, St. Martin, 49˚43′ N, 1˚55′30′′ W, sand, intertidal, coll. ix.1898. (Type status is questionable as this specimen was not included in the list of types held at the MNHN by Solís-Weiss et al. (2004)).</p> <p>Description. Holotype well preserved with body wall intact and chaetae mainly intact, pale cream in colour, in two fragments, anterior fragment 5 mm long and 1.2 mm wide for 10 segments excluding buccal tentacles, another fragment 20 mm long and 1.2 mm wide with about 85 segments. Two fragments possibly previously connected forming an entire animal. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated becoming less so posteriorly. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove from segment 3 (Fig. 8a) and discrete ventro-lateral pads from segment 2 to 18 (decreasing in size posteriorly); pads incised by transverse grooves.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles detached, numerous, of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved; both types arising dorsally on prostomial ridge. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral, blindly ending, enclosed diverticulae; margin of medial lobe straight; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip oblong (hidden by upper lip), tessellated; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, longer than wide, ridged and strongly grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3 (Fig. 8a). Achaetous segments not visible.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 29, extending to segment 31. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular and tapered distally, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, postchaetal lobe longer than prechaetal (Fig. 8b). Notochaetae all of one type (chaetigers 2, 19 examined), two distinct lengths, hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 8c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 12. Neuropodial tori ridge like, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:3:5) enlarged median tooth above main fang absent, subrostral process absent (Fig. 8d, e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular, flattened. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segments 5–8; situated at base of notopodia. Pygidium simple rosette.</p> <p>Comments. We assume that the specimen examined here is the holotype, but there is some uncertainty over its status as Caullery (1915) had previously indicated that he did not believe in depositing type material. The specimen examined is from the type locality specified by Caullery (1915) and it resembles the original description.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF84FFC8FF66A19FC329A463	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FF8AFFC6FF66A3CAC4CEA536.text	03CD87A2FF8AFFC6FF66A3CAC4CEA536.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus aurantiacus Grube 1860	<div><p>Polycirrus aurantiacus Grube, 1860</p> <p>Fig. 9a–f</p> <p>Polycirrus aurantiacus Grube, 1860: 110–112, pl. 4, fig. 8.</p> <p>Apneumea aurantiaca.— Quatrefages, 1865: 383.</p> <p>Type locality. Croatia, Adriatic Sea.</p> <p>Material examined. SYNTYPES: 2, ZMB Q4999, Croatia, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=14.416667&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=44.9" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 14.416667/lat 44.9)">Adriatic Sea</a>: Cherso (now Cres), 44º54′ N, 14º25′ E, coll. Grube; SYNTYPES: several, MPW 342, Cherso. SYNTYPE: SMNH 985, Croatia, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=14.466666&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=44.533333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 14.466666/lat 44.533333)">Meddelhavet Lussin</a> (now Lošinj), 44º32′ N, 14º28′ E.</p> <p>Description. Description based on ZMB Q4999, both well-preserved specimens with body wall intact and chaetae mainly intact, pale cream to yellowish brown in colour, both female, larger one 30 mm long and 2 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, complete with about 70 segments, smaller one 20 mm long and 2 mm wide excluding buccal segments, complete with about 60 segments. SMNH 985 an anterior fragment of tentacles and about 10 segments, 40 mm long and 4 mm wide, not well preserved, posterior fragment 30 mm long and 1.5 mm wide for about 50 segments. MPW 342 contains a large number of poorly preserved individuals, mainly buccal tentacles and few posterior fragments, one posteriorly incomplete individual 35 mm long and 3 mm wide for about 50 segments (one of these is figured in Fig. 9a, as it most clearly showed the structure of the upper lip).</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated. Anterior venter with mid-ventral groove from segment 4 (Fig. 9a) and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 3 to 12.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved; both types arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral blindly ending enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, smooth; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, longer than wide, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 4. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 46, extending to segment 48 (approximately). Notopodia short and more-or-less rectangular, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 9b). Notochaetae of one type (chaetigers 4, 21 examined), two distinct lengths, smooth with narrow striated wings, uniformly tapered (Fig. 9c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 14. Neuropodial tori ridge like, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in single transverse series or arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:0–6) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low, rounded protuberance (Fig. 9d–f).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, cylindrical. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3, 4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, on segments 5–9; situated at ventral base of notopodia. Pygidium simple rosette.</p> <p>Comments. It appears that Grube deposited syntype material of P. aurantiacus in three different museums; all of the syntype material examined is clearly labelled as types having been identified by Grube. As all specimens are conspecific and all were collected from the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago in the northern Adriatic, there appears to be nothing to be gained from designating a lectotype.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF8AFFC6FF66A3CAC4CEA536	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FF8AFFC3FF66A52FC39FA2E0.text	03CD87A2FF8AFFC3FF66A52FC39FA2E0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus bicrinalis Hutchings & Glasby 1986	<div><p>Polycirrus bicrinalis Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986</p> <p>Fig. 10a–f, Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus bicrinalis Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986: 333–334, figs 6a–f, 12D.</p> <p>Type locality. Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: AM W199637, Australia, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=141.46666&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-14.666667" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 141.46666/lat -14.666667)">Lizard Island</a>, 14º40′ S, 141º 28′ E, in amongst dead coral substrate.</p> <p>Description. Holotype pale yellow in colour, 5.1 mm long and 0.5 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, complete with about 72 segments. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum faintly tessellated anteriorly. Venter with mid-ventral groove from segment 3, with prominent papilla-like shields until chaetigers 7 or 8 (Fig. 10a); with poorly defined ventro-lateral pads, pads deeply incised with many small corrugations, appearing papillated.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of three types (most are missing): (1) leaf-shaped, deeply furrowed, (2) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved, and (3) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved; all tentacles arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, not extending laterally. Upper lip prominent medial lobe with slight lateral expansions at base, margin of medial lobe straight; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 10a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 16, extending to segment 18. Notopodia similar in size throughout, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 10b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger of two types: smooth, narrowly winged, subdistally slightly expanded, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers pinnate (Fig. 10c–d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 19, 15–25 uncini per row in mid-posterior segments. Neuropodial tori ridge like, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:7–9), enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low protuberance (Fig. 10e–f).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not visible.</p> <p>Comments. Hutchings &amp; Glasby (1986) report the following variation in the paratypes: 14–16 notochaetigerous segments, neurochaetae from segment 17–20 (Table 1), and dental formula of uncini MF:1:5–10.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF8AFFC3FF66A52FC39FA2E0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FF8FFFC3FF66A11FC2A3A5DA.text	03CD87A2FF8FFFC3FF66A11FC2A3A5DA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus boholensis Grube 1878	<div><p>Polycirrus boholensis Grube, 1878</p> <p>Fig. 11a–g, Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus boholensis Grube, 1878: 242–243, taf. XIII Fig. 7. Not Augener, 1914: 102 (= Polycirrus broomensis, see Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986: 334–336, fig. 6g –l).</p> <p>Type locality. Bohol, Philippines.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: ZMB 10654. Philippines, Bohol, leg Semper, coll. Grube.</p> <p>Description. Holotype poorly preserved with body wall damaged but parapodia and chaetae mainly intact, yellowish brown in colour, consists of five fragments that do not constitute an entire animal, all fragments only a few mm long; an anterior fragment consisting of 8 segments, mid-body fragment of 2 chaetigers, mid-posterior fragment of 12 chaetigers, and an extreme posterior fragment consisting of about 23 segments. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and poorly defined ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth with few papillations anteriorly. Mid-ventral groove divided into small shields, from segment 3 to 5 (Fig. 11a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of two types (Hutchings &amp; Glasby 1986): (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved (these now missing on type, see Fig. 11a) and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved; both types arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally. Upper lip trefoiled, with lateral, blindly ending, enclosed diverticulae (surface of diverticula with many small tentacles), margin of medial lobe thickened and overturned; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip oblong, smooth; outer region with subconical lobe protruding above venter, recurved posteriorly, smooth. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured ventrally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 10 or 11, extending to segments 12 or 13. Notopodial prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 11b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger of two types (anterior body chaetiger examined), pinnate, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers smooth, narrowly winged, uniformly tapered (Fig. 11c–e). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 14. Neuropodial tori ridge like, similar along body. Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:8), enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process absent (Fig. 11f–g).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not visible.</p> <p>Comments. Hutchings &amp; Glasby (1986) redescribed this species based on the holotype and additional specimens from NE Australia. They reported that neurochaetae begin from segment 13–15 and that the holotype had 10 or 11 notochaetigerous segments, although Grube mentions 12, possibly 13 (Table 1).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF8FFFC3FF66A11FC2A3A5DA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FF8FFFC1FF66A447C4A6A208.text	03CD87A2FF8FFFC1FF66A447C4A6A208.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus breviuncinatus Carrerette & Nogueira 2013	<div><p>Polycirrus breviuncinatus Carrerette &amp; Nogueira, 2013</p> <p>Polycirrus breviuncinatus Carrerette &amp; Nogueira, 2013: 163–165, figs 7, 8, tables 2, 5.</p> <p>Type locality. Continental shelf, State of Rio de Janeiro, 22˚3ʹ37.240ʺ S, 40˚24ʹ15.840ʺ W, 55 m.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Comments. The species has been thoroughly described by Carrerette &amp; Nogueira (2013), and the description is not repeated here. We have included it in the key to facilitate identification and comparison with other species. It appears to be closest to another Brazilian species, P. nonatoi Carrerette &amp; Nogueira, 2013, and P. broomensis Hartmann-Schröder, 1979 from NW Australia.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF8FFFC1FF66A447C4A6A208	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FF8DFFC1FF66A232C408A5E2.text	03CD87A2FF8DFFC1FF66A232C408A5E2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus broomensis Hartmann-Schroder 1979	<div><p>Polycirrus broomensis Hartmann-Schröder, 1979</p> <p>Fig. 12a–f</p> <p>Polycirrus broomensis Hartmann-Schröder, 1979: 148–149, figs 352–354.—Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1996: 336, fig. 7a–c. Polycirrus boholensis.— Augener, 1914: 102.— Not Grube, 1878.</p> <p>Type locality. Broome, Western Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: HZM P15532. Australia, Western Australia, Broome, 17˚57.04′ S, 122˚14.39′ E, sand flats in front of town, with ripple marks and plant debris from nearby Avicennia mangroves, intertidal, coll. 28.ix.1975.</p> <p>Other material examined. Australia, Western Australia, Shark Bay, Freycinet Estuary 25˚33.04’S 113˚59.09”E, 2 specimens, HZM V8270. South West Expedition 1905, 6.xi.1905, 7– 11 m, identified by Augener (1914).</p> <p>Description. Holotype well preserved with body wall slightly damaged and chaetae mainly intact, yellowpinkish in colour, 30 mm long and 1.5 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, incomplete with about 34 segments. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and poorly defined ventro-lateral pads; pads deeply incised and corrugated. Mid-ventral groove from segment 4.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved; both types arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, not extending laterally. Upper lip trefoiled, small wing-like lobes laterally, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip circular, weakly ridged; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, tessellated, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 12a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 12, extending to segment 14. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform with glandular tips, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 12b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of two types (chaetigers 4, 10 examined), hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers pinnate (Fig. 12c–d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 14. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in single vertical series (MF:1:1) subrostral process present as low, angular protuberance (Fig. 12e–f).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, cylindrical. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 11; situated at base of notopodia. Pygidium simple compact rosette.</p> <p>Comments. Material identified by Augener (1914) as Polycirrus boholensis from Shark Bay, Western Australia, has been re-examined, and is herein referred to P. broomensis. This material consists of two complete specimens, one about 50 mm long and 3.5 mm wide for about 150 segments, the specimen is coiled, and the other 60 mm long and 3 mm wide for about 110 segments. The pygidium is a compact rosette and the posterior segments are extremely short and compact.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF8DFFC1FF66A232C408A5E2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FF8DFFFFFF66A411C342A2DB.text	03CD87A2FF8DFFFFFF66A411C342A2DB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus caliendrum Claparede 1870	<div><p>Polycirrus caliendrum Claparède, 1870, species inquirenda</p> <p>Polycirrus caliendrum Claparède, 1870: 146–148, pl. XXIX, fig. 2.</p> <p>Type locality. Gulf of Naples, Mediterranean.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Comments. No material was examined, and attempts to find material from the type locality failed. This is not surprising as Claparède was not in the habit of designating types (K. Fauchald, pers. comm.). As no type material exists and the original description is very brief, we suggest that P. caliendrum is a species inquirenda. Claparède (1870) figured the animal in dorsal view and a neuropodium, showing uncini. In general, diagnostic characters are not described; however, the uncini illustrated are clearly of Type 1 sensu Glasby &amp; Glasby (1986). This is the same type as P. aurantiacus Grube, and as both species are reported to exhibit bluish or violet phosphoresence (Saint Joseph 1894), it is quite possible the two names apply to the same species, especially considering the proximity of their type localities on either side of Italy, viz. Gulf of Naples (P. caliendrum) and Croatia (P. aurantiacus).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FF8DFFFFFF66A411C342A2DB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFB3FFFFFF66A17CC73FA537.text	03CD87A2FFB3FFFFFF66A17CC73FA537.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus californicus Moore 1909	<div><p>Polycirrus californicus Moore, 1909</p> <p>Fig. 13a–f</p> <p>Polycirrus californicus Moore, 1909: 276–277, pl. 9, figs 52, 53.</p> <p>Type locality. California, USA.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: CAS 005272. USA, California, San Diego, 32˚41.05′ N, 117˚10.43′ W, coll. E.C. Starks, xii.1902.</p> <p>Description. Holotype well preserved with body wall and chaetae mainly intact, pale yellow in colour, 20 mm long and 1.2 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, complete with about 65 segments. Sex female.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tesellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 4 to 11. Mid-ventral groove from segment 4 (Fig. 13a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of one type, some shorter than others, cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip prominent medial lobe with slight lateral expansions at base, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, raised, smooth; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, ridged and grooved, extending to posterior margin of segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 13a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 28, extending to segment 30. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular but distally tapering, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, slightly longer than prechaetal (Fig. 13b). Notochaetae of one type (chaetigers 13, 19 examined), two distinct lengths, smooth, narrowly winged (wings finely striated), subdistally slightly expanded, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 13c–d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 7. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, slightly more erect posteriorly. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:8–10), enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low, rounded protuberance (Fig. 13e–f).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, large, globular. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 10; situated at base of notopodia. Pygidium simple rosette.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFB3FFFFFF66A17CC73FA537	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFB3FFFCFF66A52BC79DA2E0.text	03CD87A2FFB3FFFCFF66A52BC79DA2E0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus carolinensis Day 1973	<div><p>Polycirrus carolinensis Day, 1973</p> <p>Fig. 14a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus carolinensis Day, 1973: 122, fig. 16m –p.</p> <p>Type locality. North Carolina, USA.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: USNM 43122, USA, off <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-75.416664&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=34.066666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -75.416664/lat 34.066666)">Beaufort</a> North Carolina 34º04'N 75º25'W 20 m, coll. J.H. Day, 24.xi.1965.</p> <p>Description. Holotype well preserved, body wall cut in places to reveal nephridia, chaetae mainly intact, cream in colour, 10 mm long and 1.0 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, complete with about 60 segments. Sex unknown, no coelomic gametes visible.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth, thin body wall. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventrolateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 4 to 10. Mid-ventral groove from segment 5 (Fig. 14a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles detached (scars present) and missing, arising dorsally on prostomial ridge. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip comprising single (medial) lobe only, margin of lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip subtriangular, hidden by upper lip, smooth; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, smooth, extending to posterior margin of segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 29, extending to segment 31. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular with bulbous bases, lobes both similar, low, rounded (Fig. 14b). Notochaetae consisting of two types (chaetigers 4, 18 examined), hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers pinnate (Fig. 14c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 8. Neuropodial tori ridge-like, differ along body, posterior ones slightly curved and erect. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:7–10), enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low, rounded protuberance (Fig. 14d–e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, cylindrical, elongate. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 10; situated at ventral base of notopodia. Pygidium smooth ring.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFB3FFFCFF66A52BC79DA2E0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFB0FFFCFF66A11AC380A5BE.text	03CD87A2FFB0FFFCFF66A11AC380A5BE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus chilensis Schmarda 1861	<div><p>Polycirrus chilensis Schmarda, 1861</p> <p>Fig. 15a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus chilensis Schmarda, 1861: 39.</p> <p>Apneumea chilensis.— Quatrefages, 1865: 383.</p> <p>Dejoces chilensis Kinberg, 1867: 348.</p> <p>Type locality. Valparaiso, Chile.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: SMNH 571. Chile, Valparaiso, Ilongrotes, 33˚00.41′ S, 71˚36.37′ W, Eugene Expedition St. 488.</p> <p>Description. Holotype poorly preserved but body wall and chaetae mainly intact, in two probably contiguous fragments, pale cream in colour; anterior fragment 10 mm long and 1.5 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, consisting of approximately 25 segments; posterior fragment 5 mm long and 1 mm wide consisting of approximately 40 segments. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly papillose. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 2 to 11. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3 (Fig. 15a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of two types although few remain attached: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved, both types arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled, small wing-like lobes laterally (medial lobe subtriangular), margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, tessellated; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 15a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 35–37 (assuming two fragments are contiguous). Notopodia digitiform, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 15b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of two types (chaetigers 4, 23 examined), hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers pinnate (Fig. 15c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 8. Neuropodial tori ridge like. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:∞) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low protuberance (Fig. 15d–e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 9; situated at base of notopodia. Pygidium smooth ring.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFB0FFFCFF66A11AC380A5BE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFB0FFF9FF66A5A3C37DA458.text	03CD87A2FFB0FFF9FF66A5A3C37DA458.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus clavatus (Kinberg 1867)	<div><p>Polycirrus clavatus (Kinberg, 1867)</p> <p>Fig. 16a–e</p> <p>Cyaxares clavatus Kinberg, 1867: 348.</p> <p>Polycirrus clavatus.— Hessle, 1917: 227.</p> <p>Polycirrus habitats Carrerette &amp; Nogueira, 2013: 166–170, figs 9–10, tables 2, 6. New synonym.</p> <p>Type locality. Brazil, Alagoas, 9°S.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: SMNH 993. Brazil, 9° S, 33 m (18 fms), coll. Werngren, 1852.</p> <p>Description. Holotype poorly preserved with body wall and many chaetae damaged, pale brown in colour, anterior fragment of 9 segments 2 mm long, 0.5 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, mid-body fragment of 7 segments 2 mm long, 0.5 mm wide, poorly preserved, these 2 fragments may have been connected originally giving a total of 16 segments. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and poorly defined ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3 (Fig. 16a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of two types, with few remaining attached: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Upper lip prominent medial lobe with slight lateral expansions at base forming enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe straight; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Outer lower lip subconical lobe protruding above venter, tessellated (Fig. 16a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments at least 14, extending to segment 16 (holotype broken after segment 16). Notopodia digitiform, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 16b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetigers 4, 14 examined), gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, pinnate, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 16c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 4 or 5 (left-right side variation). Neuropodial tori ridge-like, similar along body. Uncini with moderately long neck and undulating base (Type 2, but see Comments), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:7) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process absent (Fig. 16d–e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3, 4. Postgular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 6; situated at ventral base of notopodia (Fig. 16a).</p> <p>Comments. There is some confusion in the literature on the type locality of P. clavatus. Most authors simply refer it to Brazil, but Carrerette &amp; Nogueira (2013) appear to have introduced the more specific locality of Rio de Janiero. However, the type description clearly states that it was found from latitude 9°S, which puts it in the present State of Alagoas in northeast Brazil. Polycirrus clavatus is very similar to two other species described from Brazil: P. abrolhensis Garraffoni &amp; Costa, 2003 from the Abrolhos Archipelago (18°S) in 10 m of water (see Comments for this species), and P. habitats Carrerette &amp; Nogueira, 2013, collected from off Rio de Janeiro in 720 m. The similarity with the latter species is in fact quite striking, and based on a comparison between the holotype of Cyaxares clavatus Kinberg, 1867 and the comprehensive description of Carrerette &amp; Nogueira (2013) we suggest formal synonymy of the two species. According to Carrerette &amp; Nogueira (2013) P. habitats differs from P. clavatus in having notopodia extending to segment 17 (i.e., 15 pairs) and neuropodia beginning on segment 9 (an additional difference mentioned in their key is the presence of both limbate and pinnate notochaetae in P. clavatus, but present observations indicate that P. clavatus only has pinnate notochaetae like P. habitats). As can be seen in Table 1 the mean variation within a Polycirrus species in terms of number of notopodia is about five segments and for the start of the neuropodia is about four segments, so that P. habitats falls in the range of variation expected for P. clavatus. As there appear to be no other differences between the two species, apart from the uncini (which are taken from different parts of the body and therefore would be expected to be different), we propose that P. habitats should be relegated to a junior synonymy.</p> <p>The holotype of P. clavatus consists of only 16 segments, so we were unable to observe the uncini of the posterior body. Those of the anterior body (Fig. 16d, e) however are not typical of Type 2 as defined by Glasby &amp; Glasby (2006), which has an elongate rostrum, long neck and arched (concave) base. Nevertheless, the results of their morphometric analysis utilising all components of shape variation placed these uncini in the Type 2 category. It is likely that the uncini of the posterior body have a more typical Type 2 shape. As noted in the section on morphological characters, at least three other species show the combination of Type 2 uncini and early start of uncini occurring on poorly developed neuropodia. In addition, analysis of co-varying notochaetal characters by these authors provided further support for the grouping of this species with other species bearing Type 2 uncini.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFB0FFF9FF66A5A3C37DA458	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFB4FFF7FF66A47FC38BA74D.text	03CD87A2FFB4FFF7FF66A47FC38BA74D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus coccineus Grube 1870	<div><p>Polycirrus coccineus Grube, 1870</p> <p>Fig. 17a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus (Leucariste) coccineus Grube, 1870: 515–516.</p> <p>Type locality. Red Sea.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: ZMB 529, Red Sea (no further details).</p> <p>Description. Holotype well preserved with body wall and many chaetae damaged, golden yellow in colour; body comprising three fragments which probably originally were connected, anterior fragment 3 mm long and 1.0 mm wide for seven segments excluding buccal tentacles, middle fragment 10 mm long and 1 mm wide for about 70 segments, and posterior fragment 4 mm long and 0.8 mm wide for about 30 segments. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads tessellated, extending posteriorly from segment 4. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3 (Fig. 17a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of two types with most tentacles detached from body: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved, both arising dorsally on prostomial ridge. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral blindly ending enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, smooth; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 2. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 17a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 20, extending to segment 22 (approximately). Notopodia digitiform, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe longer than prechaetal (Fig. 17b). Notochaetae consisting of one type (chaetigers 2, 16 examined), gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, pinnate, similar along body (Fig. 17c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 20. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, similar along body. Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:7–8) enlarged median tooth above main fang present (sometimes two enlarged teeth), subrostral process absent (Fig. 17d, e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular (flattened). Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3–4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 9; situated at base of notopodia. Pygidium simple rosette.</p> <p>Comments. Hartman’s (1959) view that Anisocirrus decipiens Gravier, 1905 is a junior synonym of P. coccineus is incorrect because the two species have different uncini: A. decipiens has Type 1 uncini with teeth arranged in a single vertical series, whereas P. coccineus has Type 2 uncini arranged in a double transverse series.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFB4FFF7FF66A47FC38BA74D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFBBFFF6FF66A7F1C55EA1B2.text	03CD87A2FFBBFFF6FF66A7F1C55EA1B2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus coibensis Glasby & Hutchings 2014	<div><p>Polycirrus coibensis n. sp.</p> <p>Figs 18a–e, 19a–f</p> <p>Polycirrus sp. A. Capa, 2003: 335–336.</p> <p>Type locality. Pacific coast of Panama.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: Panamá, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-81.70555&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=7.5916667" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -81.70555/lat 7.5916667)">Parque Nacional de Coiba</a>, Isla de Granito de Oro, Stn CM1 J96, 7º35ʹ30′′ N, 81º42′20′′ W, 2.3 m, dead coral substrate, MNCN 16.01 /14703, PARATYPE AM W43207. Both from same locality.</p> <p>Description. Holotype complete, gravid, 18 mm long, 1 mm wide, about 75 chaetigers (Capa 2003). Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 2 to 10. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3, not extending posteriorly beyond segment 10 (Figs 18a, 19f).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of three types: (1) leaf-shaped, deeply furrowed, (2) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved, and (3) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved, all arising dorsally on prostomial ridge. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, not extending laterally. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral, blindly ending enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe thickened and overturned; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip circular, smooth; outer region flat, shield-like (slightly inflated), subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, weakly rugose, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 39 or 40 (left side 39), extending to segments 41 or 42. Notopodia digitiform, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, slightly longer than prechaetal (Fig. 19a,f). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of two types (chaetiger 3 examined), smooth, narrowly winged and faintly hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers pinnate (Figs 18b, c; 16d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 7. Neuropodial tori ridge-like anteriorly or erect pinnules posteriorly. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:3–5:8–10) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process absent (Figs 18d, e; 19b, c,e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 8; situated at base of notopodia. Pygidium simple rosette.</p> <p>Comments. Polycirrus coibensis n. sp., appears to be closest to several Polycirrus species described from the Pacific coast of the Americas and P. swakopianus from Namibia. It differs from P. californicus (San Diego) and P. chilensis (Valparaiso) in having a smooth anterior dorsum (tessellated in P. californicus; papillose in P. chilensis) and it differs from P. swakopianus in having digitiform, more slender notopodia and with uncini lacking a subrostral process. Polycirrus coibensis n. sp., differs from P. mexicanus (La Paz, Mexico) in the dentition of the uncini—a single tooth above MF in P. mexicanus versus a double transverse series in P. coibensis n. sp.</p> <p>Etymology. The species name refers to the type locality, the National Park de Coiba, Panama.</p> <p>Habitat. In amongst dead coral substrate in shallow water.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFBBFFF6FF66A7F1C55EA1B2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFBAFFF5FF66A412C25AA2B8.text	03CD87A2FFBAFFF5FF66A412C25AA2B8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus corallicola Verrill 1900	<div><p>Polycirrus corallicola Verrill, 1900, species inquirenda</p> <p>Polycirrus corallicola Verrill, 1900: 665.</p> <p>Type locality. Atlantic Ocean, Bermuda.</p> <p>Type material examined.? HOLOTYPE: YPM 58078, Bermuda, Hamilton Parish, Bailey’s Bay, 1 m, collected during the A.E. Verrill Bermuda expedition of 1898.</p> <p>Comments. The probable holotype consists of a single slide. We dissolved the mounting medium and carefully peeled off the fragments of the specimen; however, it is now unidentifiable to species, although it clearly belongs to the genus. Therefore unless additional material is collected from this site, this species is indeterminate. The original description lacks illustrations and provides limited details regarding the noto- and neurochaetae. Verrill indicates that the type represents a small slender species, swollen anteriorly, attenuated posteriorly and consists of about 45 segments, and is 10 mm long and 1 mm wide; further he suggests it may be immature.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFBAFFF5FF66A412C25AA2B8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFB9FFF3FF66A50AC38BA7D5.text	03CD87A2FFB9FFF3FF66A50AC38BA7D5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus decipiens (Gravier 1905)	<div><p>Polycirrus decipiens (Gravier, 1905)</p> <p>Figs 20a–c; 21a–e</p> <p>Anisocirrus decipiens Gravier, 1905: 437–441.— 1906: 225–232, text figs 400–404, pl. V, figs 234–238.</p> <p>Type locality. Gulf of Aden.</p> <p>Material examined. SYNTYPES MNHN POLY TYPE 427, 428, several specimens collected from muddy sands west of the Residence at Djibouti, Gulf of Aden.</p> <p>Description. Several specimens in good condition, two specimens illustrated (one with and one without buccal tentacles), both about 2 mm maximum width and 11 mm long without buccal tentacles. Body colouration when preserved yellowish brown, not transparent.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly weakly tessellated (Fig. 20b). Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads deeply tessellated, extending from segment 3 to 12. Mid-ventral groove from segment 2 (Fig. 20a,c).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of three types, (1) leaf-shaped, deeply furrowed, (2) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (3) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, all arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip (Fig. 20a). Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral, blindly ending, enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe thickened and overturned; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip oblong, smooth; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, tessellated, extending posteriorly to segment 2. Achaetous segments only visible ventrally, obscured by prostomial ridge dorsally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 13, extending to segment 15. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, distally flared, lobes triangular, postchaetal lobe longer (Figs 20b, c, 21a). Notochaetae within a chaetiger of two types, smooth, narrowly winged, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers pinnate (Fig. 21b, c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 16, 28–30 uncini per row. Neuropodial tori ridge like, similar along body. Uncini have a short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in single vertical series (four teeth including main fang), subrostral process present as low protuberance (Fig. 21d–e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, cylindrical. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 10; situated at ventral base of notopodia. Pygidium smooth ring.</p> <p>Comments. Gravier (1905) described this species from specimens collected at several localities in the Gulf of Aden including the Golfe de Tadjourah, from reefs off Pingouin and Météore, Iles Musha, and intertidally at La Résidence à Djibouti. Although Gravier (1905, 1906) provides an extensive description of the species, some key character information is missing. For example, he does not mention the presence of smooth chaetae in addition to the pinnate types and the first segment bearing neurochaetae is not stated. We have recorded this information from the syntypes. Other points of difference between the present description and that of the type description is that Gravier reports 14 chaetigerous segments (compared to 13 observed here) and nephridial papillae extending to chaetiger 12 (segment 14), but they were observed to extend only to segment 10 on the specimen we examined.</p> <p>Hartman (1959) considered that P. decipiens Gravier, 1905 was a junior synonym of P. coccineus; however, this view is incorrect because the two species have different uncini: P. decipiens has Type 1 uncini with teeth arranged in a single vertical series, whereas P. coccineus has Type 2 uncini arranged in a double transverse series.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFB9FFF3FF66A50AC38BA7D5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFBFFFF1FF66A652C28AA10D.text	03CD87A2FFBFFFF1FF66A652C28AA10D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus denticulatus de Saint-Joseph 1894	<div><p>Polycirrus denticulatus de Saint-Joseph, 1894</p> <p>Fig. 22a, b</p> <p>Polycirrus denticulatus de Saint-Joseph, 1894: 242–243, pl. X, figs 271–274.</p> <p>Type locality. Brittany, France.</p> <p>Material examined.? HOLOTYPE MNHN 1547 (formerly Jar A 229), Concarneau, Brittany, France, coll. M le Baron de St. Joseph no. 20.</p> <p>Description. Type specimen incomplete (broken at segment 12/13), slightly yellow, especially tentacles.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated (Fig. 22a). Venter with mid-ventral groove from segment 4 (Fig. 22b) and 10 pairs of discrete ventro-lateral pads, incised, extending from segment 3 to at least segment 12.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of two types all detached: (1) leaf-shaped, deeply furrowed and (2) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip comprising single (medial) lobe only, margin of lobe thickened and overturned; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Outer lower lip flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible entirely as distinct rings.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments, 10, extending to at least segment 12 (type specimen broken). Notopodia more-orless rectangular, lobes triangular (slightly rounded), equally long. Notochaetae within a chaetiger one type (chaetiger 5 examined), two distinct lengths, smooth, narrowly winged, subdistally expanded. Neuropodia and neurochaetae not observed.</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, cylindrical. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3–4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 8; situated at ventral base of notopodia.</p> <p>Comments. The above description is a composite based on the type description and a specimen identified on the label as the type of P. denticulatus (MNHN Type 1547) from Concarneau, Brittany, collected by M le Baron de St. Joseph. This specimen does not fit exactly the type description in that there are no neurochaetae on segments 9–10, which are stated to be present in the type description. Further, the type locality is reported by Saint-Joseph (1894) to be the coast of Dinard, Britanny, NW France (48˚37.36’N 2˚03.06’W), whereas the information on the label of the MNHN Type 1547 says Concarneau, Brittany. According to Solis Weiss et al (2004) the types of P. denticulatus are registered at the MNHN under POLY TYPE 970–973. These specimens were recorded as having been collected in 1894 from Dinard, Brittany, France, which corresponds to the locality given in the type description. However, according to the current polychaete collection manager at MNHN, Tarik Meziane, 970–973 are actually parts of Type 1547 mounted on slides. Therefore, Type 1547 is tentatively regarded as the holotype, but the matter warrants further investigation considering the conflicting information on specimen versus description and on the type locality.</p> <p>According to the type description there are 13–17 notochaetigerous segments and the notochaetae are finely hirsute on one side only (the flexed, convex side). This condition suggests that the hirsuteness is a result of wear of a normal winged-type chaeta, and does not represent a true hirsute chaeta, which has hairs on both sides. The following additional character data for the posterior body are taken from the type description: neurochaetae begin on segment 9–10 before last notochaetigerous segment; there are 25–40 uncini per row; uncini have a short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1); teeth above the main fang are arranged in a double transverse series, there is an enlarged median tooth present above the main fang and the subrostral process is absent.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFBFFFF1FF66A652C28AA10D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFBCFFF0FF66A3CAC373A78B.text	03CD87A2FFBCFFF0FF66A3CAC373A78B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus disjunctus Hutchings & Glasby. Ventral 1986	<div><p>Polycirrus disjunctus Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986</p> <p>Fig. 23a–i, Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus disjunctus Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986: 336–338, fig. 7d–l, 12D.</p> <p>Type locality. Solitary Islands, NSW, Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: AM W199632, Australia, New South Wales, Solitary Islands, 29˚56′ S, 153˚25′ E.</p> <p>Description. Holotype complete, 13.8 mm long, 1.6 mm wide for 52 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove from segment 3, with poorly defined ventro-lateral pads extending only to segment 5; pads more-or-less smooth apart from weak papillations on segments 2–5.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of two types (main tentacle mass detached): (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled, small wing-like lobes laterally, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong; outer region subconical lobe protruding above venter, smooth. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured ventrally (Fig. 23a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 11, extending to segment 13. Notopodia digitiform, posterior ones about 2/3 length of anterior ones, lobes both similar, low and rounded (Fig. 23b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral; pinnate anteriorly, hirsute (possibly result of wear) posteriorly (Fig. 23c–f). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 15, 7–12 uncini per row reaching maximum number in midposterior segments. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, differ along body, becoming more elongate posteriorly. Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2), teeth above main fang arranged in single transverse series (MF:3–6), enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process very small, tooth-like or absent (Fig. 23g –i).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, minute, cylindrical. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 13; situated at antero-ventral base of notopodia.</p> <p>Comments. Hutchings &amp; Glasby (1986) report the following variation in the paratypes: 10–11 notochaetigerous segments, neurochaetae from segment 10–14, and dental formula of uncini MF:3–8 (Table 1).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFBCFFF0FF66A3CAC373A78B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFBCFFEDFF66A7B0C452A24B.text	03CD87A2FFBCFFEDFF66A7B0C452A24B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus dodeka Hutchings 1990	<div><p>Polycirrus dodeka Hutchings, 1990</p> <p>Fig. 24a–d</p> <p>Polycirrus dodeka Hutchings, 1990: 381–383, fig. 1a–d.</p> <p>Type locality. Hong Kong.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: AM W201884, Hong Kong, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=114.35&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=22.5" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 114.35/lat 22.5)">Chek Chau</a>, 22°30' N 114°21' E, coll. 10.iv.1986, under boulders in shallow water.</p> <p>Description. Holotype, originally complete now with posterior part of body detached, 10 mm long, 1 mm wide anteriorly, for about 65 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum faintly tessellated anteriorly. Venter with mid-ventral groove from segment 4 and poorly defined ventro-lateral pads, pads deeply incised.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, not extending laterally. Upper lip comprising single (medial) lobe only, margin of lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip oblong, ridged; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 24a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 12, extending to segment 14. Notopodia digitiform, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, slighty longer than prechaetal. Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetiger 6 examined), two distinct lengths, strongly hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 24b). Neurochaetae begin on segment 14, 5–10 uncini per row. Neuropodial tori erect rectangular pinnules. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in multiple series or arranged in double transverse series (MF:2:∞), two enlarged median teeth above main fang, subrostral process absent (Fig. 24c).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, spherical, initially very small and difficult to discern. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 14; situated at base of notopodia (Fig. 24d).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFBCFFEDFF66A7B0C452A24B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFA1FFEDFF66A2F0C40EA528.text	03CD87A2FFA1FFEDFF66A2F0C40EA528.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus dubius Day 1973	<div><p>Polycirrus dubius Day, 1973</p> <p>Fig. 25a–d</p> <p>Polycirrus eximius dubius Day, 1973: 123, fig. 16q.</p> <p>Type locality. North Carolina, USA.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: USNM 43130, USA, off <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-76.43878&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=34.723602" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -76.43878/lat 34.723602)">Beaufort</a>, North Carolina, 34°43ʹ24.97ʺ N, 76°26ʹ19.61ʺ W, 18 m on coral.</p> <p>Description. Alcohol-preserved animal, yellowish brown in colour, 13 mm long, 2 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, complete with about 80 segments posteriorly segmentation compact. Sex unknown. Large sections of the epidermis have been removed anterodorsally to reveal the nephridia.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly faintly ridged. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads deeply incised (corrugated), extending from segment 3 to 10. Mid-ventral groove from segment 4 (Fig. 25a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles missing, arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, U-shaped, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral blindly-ending enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip subtriangular (hidden by upper lip); outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, strongly rugose, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 34, extending to segment 36. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, slightly longer than prechaetal (Fig. 25b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger of one type (chaetigers 4, 14 examined), gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, very finely hirsute, subdistally slightly expanded slightly, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 25c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 11. Neuropodial tori erect rectangular pinnules, differ along body becoming more erect posteriorly; extreme posterior ones becoming small. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:8–11) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low rounded protuberance (Fig. 25d).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, cylindrical, decreasing in size posteriorly. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3–4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, on segments 5–8, decreasing in size posteriorly; situated at ventral base of notopodia. Pygidium smooth ring.</p> <p>Comments. We have elevated the subspecies Polycirrus eximius dubia to a full species, P. dubia; it differs from the stem species P. eximius Leidy, 1855 in the number of notochaetigerous segments (25 in P. eximius; 34 in P.dubius), a difference that well exceeds normal intraspecific variation (Table 1). Polycirrus eximius is herein regarded as a species inquirenda.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFA1FFEDFF66A2F0C40EA528	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFA1FFEAFF66A5D0C228A6AE.text	03CD87A2FFA1FFEAFF66A5D0C228A6AE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus elisabethae McIntosh 1915	<div><p>Polycirrus elisabethae McIntosh, 1915</p> <p>Fig. 26a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus elisabethae McIntosh, 1915: 35–36.</p> <p>Polycirrus haematodes.— McIntosh, 1922: 198–200, pl. 127, figs. 2, 2d.— Not P. haematodes Claparède, 1864.</p> <p>Type locality. St Andrews, Scotland.</p> <p>Material examined. LECTOTYPE designated herein (NHMUK 2014.6. 1) Scotland, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-2.7815778&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=56.337032" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -2.7815778/lat 56.337032)">St Andrews</a>, 56°20ʹ13.32ʺ N, 2°46ʹ53.68ʺ W, from debris of fishing boats. PARALECTOTYPES: 2, BMNH ZK 1921:5:1:4119, same locality.</p> <p>Description. Lectotype designated from amongst McIntosh's syntypes, well preserved with body wall damaged and large parts removed but chaetae mainly intact, colourless, one complete individual, 7 mm long, 1 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, complete with about 30 segments. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 3. Mid-ventral groove from segment 4 (Fig. 26a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of two types, most missing: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip comprising single (medial) lobe only, margin of lobe straight; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong (narrow; hidden by upper lip), smooth; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 26a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 16, extending to segment 18. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, postchaetal lobe longer than prechaetal (Fig. 26b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger of one type (chaetigers 4, 14 examined), two distinct lengths, hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 26c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 11. Neuropodial tori ridge like, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:11–15) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low, angular protuberance (Fig. 26d, e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular, small and flattened. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segments 5 to 8; situated at posteroventral base of notopodia. Pygidium simple rosette.</p> <p>Comments. McIntosh described P. elisabethae in 1915, although briefly with no illustrations. Subsequently (1922) he illustrated the chaetae and formally synonymised it with P. haematodes (Claparède, 1864), described from Port Vendres on the French Mediterranean coast. However, after re-examination of McIntosh’s material, we believe that his specimens represent a distinct species and therefore should be removed from synonymy. McIntosh did not provide a precise locality for P. elisabethae in the original description, although from the title of his paper it is likely to be in the region of St Andrews, Scotland. However, the original label indicates that the specimens were collected from the debris of fishing boats at St Andrews. We have therefore designated the best specimen as the lectotype, and St Andrews is fixed as the type locality.</p> <p>Hessle (1917), Hartman (1959), and Holthe (1986a) considered P. elisabethae to be perhaps the same as P. norvegicus. Although the two species are both in the North Sea (although on opposite sides), we reject this synonymisation because of differences in the shape of the lower lip (longer than wide in P. norvegicus and wider than long in P. elisabethae) and the shape and dentition of the uncini (more prominent subrostral process and 11–15 minute teeth surmounting the MF in P. elisabethae compared to only 1–4 larger teeth in P. norvegicus). It seems unlikely that P. elisabethae is synonymous with P. haematodes given the distance between type localities, but as we have been unsuccessful in locating the type material of P. haematodes, which we currently regard as a species inquirenda, the necessary comparison of type specimens is presently not possible.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFA1FFEAFF66A5D0C228A6AE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFA6FFE9FF66A557C5B5A22E.text	03CD87A2FFA6FFE9FF66A557C5B5A22E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus eous Annenkova 1924	<div><p>Polycirrus eous Annenkova, 1924</p> <p>Polycirrus eous Annenkova, 1924:126.</p> <p>Type locality. Kulku Bay, Okhotsk Sea, Russia. 59˚16′N 146˚20′E.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Description. Based on original description, body transparent when preserved, 15 mm long (no width indicated) with 55–56 segments.</p> <p>Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads, ventro-lateral pads of first and second segments fused with each other. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3.</p> <p>Outer lower lip subconical, lobe protruding above venter (as stated in original description, 'large process which projects with an angle like point between parapodia of third segment').</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 21, extending to segment 23. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, long initially but becoming small and rounded on segments 10 and 11. Notochaetae within a chaetiger of one type, pinnate (the translator used term spicate), posteriorly presumably same form as those anteriorly. Neurochaetae beginning on segment 13. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:5) enlarged median tooth above main fang present.</p> <p>Comments. The original description lacks any illustrations, but there is sufficient character information to be able to code the important features and it keys out as a distinct species.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFA6FFE9FF66A557C5B5A22E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFA5FFE9FF66A2D7C392A6A6.text	03CD87A2FFA5FFE9FF66A2D7C392A6A6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus eximius Leidy 1855	<div><p>Polycirrus eximius Leidy, 1855, species inquirenda</p> <p>Torquea eximia Leidy, 1855: 146, pl. XI, figs 51–52.</p> <p>Apneumea eximia.— Quatrefages, 1865: 383.</p> <p>Polycirrus eximius.— Verrill, 1873: 616, pl.16, fig. 85.</p> <p>Type locality. East coast of USA, see notes in Comments.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Description. Body soft, colour blood-red. Notochaetae within a chaetiger one type, 12 chaetae per parapodium anteriorly, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral. Primary notochaetae in anterior chaetigers smooth, subdistally expanded with wings; posteriorly same form as those anteriorly, 3–6 chaetae per parapodium. Neurochaetae beginning on segment 8. Neurochaetae 12–40. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), subrostral process absent.</p> <p>Comments. The above brief description is based on the type description; however, there are insufficient data to allow us to fully code and differentiate this species. The original description has three illustrations: a lateral view of an uncinus that is short-handled (Type 1) and two notochaetae that have winged tips. The illustrations are very diagrammatic and not sufficient to characterise the species, therefore we have not reproduced them here. Leidy (1855) does not give a precise location as to where this species was collected, but indicates that the fauna described in this paper were collected from Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, and in the vicinity of Atlantic City and at the mouth of Great Egg Harbour, both in New Jersey, USA.</p> <p>Verrill (1873) described P. eximius as having 25 notochaetigerous segments and uncini from chaetiger 8, and this description was repeated by Miner (1950). Day (1973) suggested that P. eximius is a very variable species with 16–31 notochaetigerous segments, neurochaetae starting on chaetigers 7–9, and 3–6 pairs of nephridia. Day suggested that as such variation is greater than typically exhibited by species of Polycirrus, his specimen from North Carolina, USA, with 25–31 pairs of notochaetigers should be treated as a separate subspecies. We have elevated the subspecies to a full species (see P. dubia above). Day (1973) examined material from Vineyard Sound, Massachusetts, identified by Verrill in 1881 (USNM 8165) and some fresh material from off Beaufort in 5–80 m; he documented some variation in the number of pairs of notopodia and nephridial papillae present. It seems likely that Day was in fact examining more than one species. Day (1973) also states that the type of Torquea eximia Leidy is lost, the description is inadequate, and the original drawings are too small to show specific characters. We agree with Day (1973) and suggest that the species be treated as species inquirenda until additional material is available.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFA5FFE9FF66A2D7C392A6A6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFA5FFE8FF67A6ABC433A5CF.text	03CD87A2FFA5FFE8FF67A6ABC433A5CF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus fedorovi Jirkov & Leontovich 2001	<div><p>Polycirrus fedorovi Jirkov &amp; Leontovich in Jirkov, 2001</p> <p>Fig. 27a–c</p> <p>Polycirrus fedorovi Jirkov &amp; Leontovich in Jirkov, 2001, 504–505, fig. parts 1–3 (unnumbered).</p> <p>Type locality. Arctic Ocean.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Description. Based on type description and figures. Type series consists of 29 specimens, up to 35 mm long for 65 chaetigers, body thicker than other members of the genus, wide, relatively short. Body colouration whitish when preserved.</p> <p>Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 3 to 16 (at least). Mid-ventral groove from segment 2.</p> <p>Upper lip trefoiled, small wing-like lobes laterally (four folds are actually mentioned in type description; the extra fold is here interpreted as a convoluted medial lobe), margin of medial lobe convoluted. Outer lower lip subconical lobe protruding above venter (inferred from Fig. 27a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 19–21, extending to segments 21–23 (range of notochaetigerous segments for all specimens 18–25). Notopodia papilliform (inferred from Fig. 27a). Notochaetae within a chaetiger one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, smooth, narrowly winged (although wings not visible in fig. 2 of type description), uniformly tapered (Fig. 27b), posteriorly same form as those anteriorly. Neurochaetae beginning on segment 13–15, 20 uncini per row (approximation based on fig. 1 of type description). Neuropodial tori ridge-like, differ along body: relatively long on anterior chaetigers, longest in mid-body, becoming short on posterior chaetigers. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series, subrostral process tooth-like (Fig. 27c).</p> <p>Comments. The original description is brief but sufficiently detailed to code and determine that the species can be distinguished from other Polycirrus species, in particular for its papilliform notopodia and one type of notochaetae (smooth, narrow wings).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFA5FFE8FF67A6ABC433A5CF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFA4FFE6FF66A470C721A190.text	03CD87A2FFA4FFE6FF66A470C721A190.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus glaucus Hutchings 1993	<div><p>Polycirrus glaucus Hutchings, 1993</p> <p>Fig. 28a–c</p> <p>Polycirrus glaucus Hutchings, 1993: 322–323, fig. 1a–c.</p> <p>Type locality. Rottnest Island, Western Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: AM W20937, Australia, Western Australia, Rottnest Island, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=115.49551&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-32.020115" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 115.49551/lat -32.020115)">Roe</a> reef, 32°1ʹ12.42ʺ S, 115°29ʹ43.83ʺ E, 30 m.</p> <p>Description. Holotype complete, 12 mm long and 1.5 mm wide with about 65 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised (tessellated), extending from segment 3 to 7. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3 (Fig. 28a). Sex male.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral, blindly ending, enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe straight; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong with raised margin, smooth; outer region subconical lobe protruding above venter, weakly tessellated, extending posteriorly to anterior edge of segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured ventrally (Fig. 28a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 11, extending to segment 13. Notopodia digitiform, anterior ones more elongate than posterior ones, tips of podia swollen, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal. Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, pinnate, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 28c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 14 (first segment after last notopodial segment). Neuropodial tori erect rectangular pinnules, posteriorly pinnules becoming more erect with notopodial cirrus. Uncini with long neck and weakly concave base (Type 2), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:2:3), subrostral process absent (Fig. 28b).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, spherical. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 13; situated at anterior base of notopodia. Pygidium smooth ring.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFA4FFE6FF66A470C721A190	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFAAFFE6FF66A18AC7ADA615.text	03CD87A2FFAAFFE6FF66A18AC7ADA615.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus haematodes (Claparede 1864)	<div><p>Polycirrus haematodes (Claparède, 1864), species inquirenda</p> <p>Aphlebina haematodes Claparède, 1864: 485, pl.2 fig.1.</p> <p>Polycirrus haematodes.— Langerhans, 1884: 265, fig. 26.</p> <p>Type locality. Port Vendres, on French-Spanish border, Mediterranean.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Comments. No type material exists as Claparède was not in the habit of designating types, and as the original description is very brief, we suggest that this is a species inquirenda. Attempts to locate any material from the type locality were unsuccesful. McIntosh (1922) synonymised P. elisabethae with P. haematodes (Claparède, 1864); however, without type material of the latter we cannot assess that validity of this synonymy.</p> <p>Holthe (1986b) provides a description of this species but it is unclear where his specimens were collected. He gives a very broad geographical distribution for this species, including the Mediterranean, the eastern North Atlantic to Madeira and the west coasts of Ireland and Scotland. We suggest that several species may have been confused under this name. Langerhans (1884) illustrates a Type 1 uncinus from a specimen from Madeira (see also Glasby &amp; Glasby 2006).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFAAFFE6FF66A18AC7ADA615	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFAAFFE4FF66A609C2CAA04E.text	03CD87A2FFAAFFE4FF66A609C2CAA04E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus hamiltoni Benham. Smallest 1921	<div><p>Polycirrus hamiltoni Benham, 1921</p> <p>Fig. 29a–f</p> <p>Polycirrus hamiltoni Benham, 1921: 94, pl. 9, fig. 101–106.</p> <p>Type locality. Macquarie Island, Antarctica.</p> <p>Material examined. SYNTYPES: 3, AM W611, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=158.95&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-54.5" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 158.95/lat -54.5)">Australian Antarctic Expedition</a>, Australia, Macquarie Island, Garden Bay, intertidal 54°30ʹ S, 158°57ʹ E (smallest syntype illustrated here).</p> <p>Additional material examined. 8 specimens, AM W824, Australia, Macquarie Island, 54°30ʹ S, 158°57ʹ E.</p> <p>Description. Syntypes mainly well preserved with body wall intact, yellowish in colour, 2 complete and 1 incomplete individuals forming type series. Complete individuals 10 mm long (without tentacles), 1 mm wide for 50 segments and 15 mm long (without tentacles) and 1.2 mm wide for 65 segments. Posteriorly incomplete specimen (illustrated here and separated in a microvial from other syntypes) 10 mm long (without tentacles which are missing) and 1 mm wide for 37 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 3 to 12. Mid-ventral groove from segment 2 (Fig. 29a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous of two types, (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral blindly-ending enclosed diverticula, margin of medial lobe convoluted (slightly); oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, raised, ridged; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 30–34, extending to segments 32–36. Notopodia digitiform anteriorly and moreor-less rectangular posteriorly, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal initially, though lobes becoming equal posteriorly (Fig. 29b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of two types (chaetigers 4, 16 examined), hirsute, subdistally expanded (slightly), posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers pinnate (Fig. 29c, d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 9. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, differ along body (uncini arranged in C-shaped row in posterior tori). Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:∞) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process absent (Fig. 29e, f).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segment 4 only. Postgular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 8; situated at ventral base of notopodia (Fig. 29a). Pygidium simple rosette.</p> <p>Comments. The specimens described here and labelled as syntypes are not the same as those described by Benham (1921). The size and chaetiger numbers do not match. Further, Benham states in his original description that one of the specimens is a mature female, whereas (AM W611) contains two mature males; however, in all other respects the material fits Benham's description and is accepted here as representing syntype material. It is likely that the syntypes were designated after Benham (1921) described the species P. hamiltoni.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFAAFFE4FF66A609C2CAA04E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFA8FFE4FF66A0F7C434A4C4.text	03CD87A2FFA8FFE4FF66A0F7C434A4C4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus hesslei Monro 1930	<div><p>Polycirrus hesslei Monro, 1930</p> <p>Fig. 30a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus hesslei Monro, 1930:195–197.</p> <p>Type locality. Falkland Islands.</p> <p>Material examined. SYNTYPES: BMNH ZK 1930.10.8.2911-15, St.WS 73, 51º02ʹ S, 58º5ʹ W to 51º00ʹ S, 58º53ʹ W, north of <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-58.883335&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-51.0" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -58.883335/lat -51.0)">East Falkland</a>, trawled 121–130 m, coll. 6.iii.1927, fine dark sand.</p> <p>Description. Syntypes fairly well preserved with body walls mainly intact and chaetae mainly intact, pale yellow in colour. Three individuals of which only one is complete. Complete individual 50 mm long, 4 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, with approximately 135 segments. Two individuals gravid.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised (transverse grooves), extending from segment 4 to 11. Mid-ventral groove from segment 4 (Fig. 30a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of one type, cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, some shorter than others, arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled, small wing-like lobes laterally, margin of medial lobe convoluted, thin; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip oblong, ridged; outer region flat, shieldlike, inverted T-shaped (expanded posteriorly), tessellated, extending posteriorly to posterior margin of segment 3. Achaetous segments not visible (Fig. 30a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 13, extending to segment 15. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular with expanded tips, lobes triangular, postchaetal lobe longer than prechaetal (Fig. 30b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger one type (chaetiger 4 and a mid-body chaetiger examined), gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, hirsute (under high power), uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 30c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 15. Neuropodial tori erect rectangular pinnules, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in single transverse series or arranged in double transverse series (MF:2–3 or MF:1:3–4) enlarged median tooth above main fang present or absent, subrostral process present as low, rounded protuberance (Fig. 30d, e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular, flattened. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 9; situated at base of notopodia. Pygidium simple cone with central depression.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFA8FFE4FF66A0F7C434A4C4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFAFFFE1FF66A457C55EA048.text	03CD87A2FFAFFFE1FF66A457C55EA048.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus holthei Londono-Mesa & Carerra-Parra 2005	<div><p>Polycirrus holthei Londoño-Mesa &amp; Carerra-Parra, 2005</p> <p>Fig. 31a–e, Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus holthei Londoño-Mesa &amp; Carerra-Parra, 2005: 4–6, fig. 1D–H.</p> <p>Type locality. Cancún, Mexico.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Type material. HOLOTYPE: ECOSUR 0054, Mexico, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-86.778946&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=21.036583" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -86.778946/lat 21.036583)">Cancún</a>, Punta Nizuc, 21°02′11.7′′ N, 86°46′44.2′′ W, coll. 10.ii.2001, 2 m, in coralline rock.</p> <p>Description. Based on type description. Holotype complete with 42 segments, 6.5 mm long, 1.1 mm wide; paratypes with up to 46 segments. Body transparent when preserved.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth (Fig. 31a). Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads (visible only with stain); pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 2 to 6–7. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3 (Fig. 31b).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled, small wing-like, clover-shaped lobes laterally, margin of medial lobe straight and narrow. Outer lower lip flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 2. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured ventrally (Fig. 31a, b).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 10–13, extending to segments 12–15. Notopodia digitiform, pointed. Notochaetae within a chaetiger one type, two distinct lengths, pinnate, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 31c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 6. Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2), anterior ones with almost flat base and smaller, teeth above main fang arranged in double or triple transverse series (anteriorly MF:1:3-4:5-6, but see comments; posteriorly MF:1:1) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process absent (Fig. 31d,e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, spherical. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 11–13; situated at posteroventral base of notopodia (Fig. 31a). Pygidium papillated ring with nine short papillae.</p> <p>Comments. The dental formula for the thoracic neurochaetae provided by Londoño-Mesa &amp; Carerra-Parra (2005) suggests three rows of teeth above the main fang, yet their figure (Fig. 31e) shows only two rows, at least in the way that we interpet a row (successive curved lines of teeth). Therefore using our definition, the dental formula would be MF:1:8–10. Another discrepancy between the description and the figures is in regard to the position of the nephridial papillae. Londoño-Mesa &amp; Carerra-Parra (2005) state that they are posterior to the notopodia, but figure 31a, b clearly show them to be anterior to the notopodia.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFAFFFE1FF66A457C55EA048	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFADFFE1FF66A0C2C4D3A7B8.text	03CD87A2FFADFFE1FF66A0C2C4D3A7B8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus jubatus Bobretzky	<div><p>Polycirrus jubatus Bobretzky in Annenkova, 1924, species inquirenda</p> <p>Polycirrus jubatus Bobretzky in Annenkova 1924: 126.</p> <p>Type locality. Black Sea.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Comments. As no type material could be located and the original description is very brief with no illustrations, we suggest that this species is a species inquirenda.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFADFFE1FF66A0C2C4D3A7B8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFADFFE0FF67A7ACC249A403.text	03CD87A2FFADFFE0FF67A7ACC249A403.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus kerguelensis (McIntosh 1885)	<div><p>Polycirrus kerguelensis (McIntosh, 1885)</p> <p>Fig. 32</p> <p>Euretho kerguelensis McIntosh, 1885: 474, pl. 28A, figs 20, 21. (secondary senior homonym of Polycirrus kergulenesis McIntosh, 1885).</p> <p>Type locality. Kerguelen Islands.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: BMNH 1885. 12.1.371. St. 149G, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=69.3&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-48.833332" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 69.3/lat -48.833332)">Kerguelen Islands</a>, off London River, 48º50ʹ S, 69º18ʹ E, coll. Challenger Expedition, 29.i. 1874, 201 m (110 fm).</p> <p>Description. Holotype well preserved with mid-body wall damaged and few chaetae intact, in three pieces representing two individuals, but only one with head. Head-end fragment 20 mm long, 2 mm width for 37 segments, no buccal tentacles remaining. Headless fragments not related to anterior fragment. The following description based on the head-end fragment. Preserved specimen pale cream in colour. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised into two by transverse groove), extending from segment 4 to 10. Mid-ventral groove from segment 5 (Fig. 32).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles missing, arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral, blindly ending, enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip subtriangular, rounded, ridged and tessellated; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, tessellated, extending posteriorly to posterior margin of segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 32).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 13, extending to segment 15. Notopodia digitiform, lobes distally flared slightly, postchaetal lobe slightly longer than prechaetal most marked posteriorly). Notochaetae of chaetiger 4 examined; most chaetae damaged (not illustrated here), tips hirsute (tips shorter and less attenuated than those of Polycirrus kerguelensis according to McIntosh), uniformly tapered, wings absent. Neurochaetae beginning on segment 6. Neuropodial tori ridge-like, differ along body, posterior body ones slightly more erect (not illustrated here). Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:5–6) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low rounded protuberance.</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not visible, although McIntosh describes them as being present on chaetigers 5–7.</p> <p>Comments. McIntosh (1885) indicates that the material is gravid, however coelomic oocytes are visible only in the posterior fragment, which is not part of the same individual as the anterior fragment. Because some fragments lacked a head we were unsure if all specimens belong to the same species.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFADFFE0FF67A7ACC249A403	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFACFF9EFF66A434C787A1D8.text	03CD87A2FFACFF9EFF66A434C787A1D8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus latidens Eliason 1962	<div><p>Polycirrus latidens Eliason, 1962</p> <p>Fig. 33a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus latidens Eliason, 1962: 286–287, fig. 23.</p> <p>Type locality. Skagerrak, Atlantic Ocean.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: UUZM 196 a. Atlantic Ocean, Skagerrak, Uppsala Expedition coll. 5.vii.1933, St.22, Bergskrapa, 57˚59′ N, 8˚13.5′ E, 531 m, coll 5.vii.1933. PARATYPE: UUZM 196 B, Atlantic Ocean, Uppsala Expedition 1933, St.6. 58˚18.8ʹ N 9˚57’ E, coll 27.vi.1933.</p> <p>Description. Type specimens well preserved with body wall intact and chaetae mainly intact, pale cream in colour. Holotype 17 mm long and 1.5 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, incomplete with 20 segments. Paratype consists of three posterior fragments: 10 mm long and 1.2 mm wide for 15 segments, 4 mm long and 1.2 mm wide for 6 segments, and about 20 mm long (strongly coiled) and 1.2 mm wide for about 20 segments. The following description is based upon the holotype other than where stated. Sex female.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; anterior pads with transverse grooves and tessellations extending from segment 5 to 9. Mid-ventral groove from segment 4 (Fig. 33a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of one type, few remaining, cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, some shorter than others; arising dorsally on prostomial ridge. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, not extending laterally. Upper lip triangular, comprising medial lobe only, margin thickened and overturned; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip subtriangular, hidden by upper lip, ridged; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 4. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 33a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 12, extending to segment 14. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular but rounded distally, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 33b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetigers 5, 14 examined), gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 33c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 14. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), 3–5 teeth above main fang arranged in single vertical series (MF:1:1:1 to MF:1:1:1:1:1) subrostral process present as low angular protuberance (Fig. 33d,e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, cylindrical. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segment 4 only. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 8; situated at ventral base of notopodia (Fig. 33a).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFACFF9EFF66A434C787A1D8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFD2FF9EFF66A042C2F1A73B.text	03CD87A2FFD2FF9EFF66A042C2F1A73B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus leocine (Quatrefages 1865)	<div><p>Polycirrus leocine (Quatrefages, 1865), species inquirenda</p> <p>Apneume leocine Quatrefages, 1865: 382–383, pl.14, figs 10–11.</p> <p>Type locality. Bay of Biscay.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Comments. As no type material exists and the original description is very brief, we suggest that P. leocine is a species inquirenda. Attempts to obtain additional material from the type locality were unsuccessful.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFD2FF9EFF66A042C2F1A73B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFD2FF9DFF66A7DCC71DA175.text	03CD87A2FFD2FF9DFF66A7DCC71DA175.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus luminosus Verrill 1900	<div><p>Polycirrus luminosus Verrill, 1900</p> <p>Fig. 34a–c</p> <p>Polycirrus luminosus Verrill, 1900: 666.</p> <p>Type locality. Bermuda.</p> <p>Material examined. SYNTYPES?: 4, YPM No. 1311. Bermuda, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-64.75737&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=32.32138" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -64.75737/lat 32.32138)">Bailey Bay</a>, 32°19ʹ16.98ʺ N, 64°45ʹ26.53ʺ W, coll. A.E. Verrill and party, 1901.</p> <p>Description. Possible syntype specimens well preserved with body wall and chaetae largely intact, consists of four posteriorly incomplete specimens and several headless fragments. Alcohol-preserved animals yellowishbrown in colour, 2–7 mm long, 0.2–0.7 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, 10–21 segments. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads tessellated, extending to segment 12. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally, distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin, weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip prominent medial lobe and small wing-like lateral lobes, margin of medial lobe straight. Inner lower lip hidden by upper lip; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 25, extending to segment 27 (minimum); posteriorly incomplete. Notopodia digitiform, decreasing in size posteriorly, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, postchaetal lobe equal long to prechaetal or slightly longer than prechaetal. Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetigers 4, 16, 25 examined), gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly, although fewer (Fig. 34a). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 10 and present on all remaining segments (but all material is incomplete). Neuropodial tori ridge-like, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:10) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low, angular protuberance (Fig. 34b, c).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 11; situated at ventral base of notopodia.</p> <p>Comments. Although the material examined is not labelled as types, it matches well with the description by Verrill (1900) and is from the same locality, Bailey Bay, Bermuda. We agree with Londoňo-Mesa (2009) that they are probably the type specimens. The view that P. luminosus is a junior synonym of P. purpureus (type locality, Jamaica) held by Hartman (1959), Holthe (1986a), and Londoño-Mesa (2009) is not accepted here as differences were noted in the types of both species including the form of the upper lip and shape of the uncini (see below for description of P. purpureus). Possibly the view is based on Augener’s (1925) opinion that the two species are synonymous, but Augener’s view was based on an examination of the types of only one of these species (P. purpureus).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFD2FF9DFF66A7DCC71DA175	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFD0FF9BFF66A58EC31BA61E.text	03CD87A2FFD0FF9BFF66A58EC31BA61E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus macintoshi Glasby & Hutchings 2014	<div><p>Polycirrus macintoshi nomen novum</p> <p>Fig. 35a–d</p> <p>Polycirrus kerguelensis McIntosh, 1885: xx, fig. 32a–d.</p> <p>Polycirrus kerguelensis McIntosh, 1885: 475.— Monro, 1930: 194; 1936: 184.— Gravier, 1911: 141–143, pl. 11, fig. 138.— Augener, 1932: 67.— Hartman, 1966: 106–107. (secondary junior homonym—of Ereutho kergulenesis McIntosh, 1885). Ereutho antarctica.— Willey, 1902: 281, Pl. XLII fig. 6, Pl. XLVI fig. 6. Not McIntosh, 1885.</p> <p>Ereutho antarctica.— Willey, 1902: 281, Pl. XLII fig. 6, Pl. XLVI fig. 6. Not McIntosh, 1885.</p> <p>Type locality. Kerguelen Island, Antarctic.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: BMNH ZK 1885:12:1:372. St.149 H, 48º45ʹ S, 69º14ʹ E, off <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=142.6&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-67.0" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 142.6/lat -67.0)">Christmas Harbour</a>, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=142.6&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-67.0" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 142.6/lat -67.0)">Kerguelen Island</a>, 232 m (127 fm), coll. 29.i.1874, dredged volcanic mud. NON-TYPES: AM W827, Adelie Land Commonwealth Bay, Boat Harbour, 67° S, 142°36ʹ E.</p> <p>Description. Based on type material plus material of AM W827 collected by the Australian Antarctic Expedition which closely resembles the type fragment. Alcohol preserved animal, pale yellow in colour, 4 mm long, 1 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, posteriorly incomplete. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Holotype poorly preserved with body wall damaged and large amounts of the body wall removed, chaetae mainly damaged, thus making the determination of number of segments impossible.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 2 to 13. Mid-ventral groove from segment 4 (Fig. 35a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles missing, arising dorsally on prostomial ridge, which extends laterally. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip comprising single (medial) lobe only, margin of lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, partially hidden by upper lip, smooth; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, smooth, divided in two by transverse groove, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 35a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 11, extending to segment 13 (determined from non-type specimens). Notopodia and notochaetae damaged. Notochaetae within a chaetiger one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, hirsute, uniformly tapered (Fig. 35b). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 14. Neuropodial tori ridge-like. Uncini with short neck and elongated straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series, subrostral process present as low, rounded protuberance (Fig. 35c, d).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not visible.</p> <p>Comments. McIntosh (1885) described two different species named kergulensis in two different genera (Polycirrus and Ereutho). As the two names are now considered to represent the same genus, Ereutho kerguelensis becomes a member of Polycirrus. Unfortunately this renders P. kerguelensis McIntosh, 1885 as a junior homonym on the basis of page priority. We therefore propose a new name, Polycirrus macintoshi n. nom., for P. kerguelensis.</p> <p>Earlier, Hartman (1966) synonymised E. kerguelensis with P. kerguelensis with no comment. She also gave a composite description of a species with 11–15 pairs of notopodia and neurochaetae from the first to the third last notopodium, which is an unusual configuration. We suggest that at least two species have been confused and all references listed by her on page 106 require a re-examination of material. However, we can confirm that material identified by Gravier (1911) as P. kerguelensis, as listed in the synonymy of Hartman (1966), is correct.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFD0FF9BFF66A58EC31BA61E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFD7FF99FF66A602C213A2E0.text	03CD87A2FFD7FF99FF66A602C213A2E0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus medius Hessle 1917	<div><p>Polycirrus medius Hessle, 1917</p> <p>Fig. 36a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus medius Hessle, 1917: 225–226, fig. 64—a, b.</p> <p>Type locality. Sagami Misaki Ebbestrand, Japan.</p> <p>Material examined. SYNTYPES: UPZM 183 a, several, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=130.23653&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=33.11555" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 130.23653/lat 33.11555)">Dr Sixten Bocks</a>, Japan Expedition 1914. Japan, Sagami Misaki Ebbestrand, 33°6ʹ55.99ʺ N, 130°14ʹ11.47ʺ E, coll. S. Bock 1914. UPZM 183 b, 1 individual.</p> <p>Description. Complete syntype well preserved with body wall intact and chaetae mainly intact; pale cream in colour; 20 mm long, 1 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, complete with 80 segments. Sex male. Other specimens ranging from 50 mm long, 1.5 mm wide for about 90 segments and gravid; 25 mm long, 2.5 mm wide for about 80 segments; 23 mm long, 1.5 mm wide for about 75 segments; 20 mm long, 1.5 mm wide for about 70 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly faintly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised and weakly tessellated, extending from segment 2 to 8. Mid-ventral groove from segment 5 (Fig. 36a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising dorsally on prostomial ridge. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral blindly-ending enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong hidden by upper lip, ridged; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, longer than wide, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to posterior margin of segment 4. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 17, extending to segment 19. Notopodia digitiform, lobes both similar, low and rounded (Fig. 36b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetigers 4, 14 examined), gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, pinnate, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 36c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 15. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules (elongate), similar along body. Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2), single tooth above main fang, subrostral process absent (Fig. 36d,e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3, 4. Postgular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 8; situated at antero-ventral base of notopodia. Pygidium simple rosette with terminal orange pigment spot.</p> <p>Comments. Of the several syntypes available, the most complete one was separated from the rest of the material and is the one described above. The remaining type material varies in length as given in the above description and also varies in the number of pairs of notopodia, which range from 16 to 18 pairs. The segment on which the neuropodia first appear also varies, from chaetiger 15 to chaetiger 16.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFD7FF99FF66A602C213A2E0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFD5FF99FF66A167C54CA4F8.text	03CD87A2FFD5FF99FF66A167C54CA4F8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus medusa Grube 1850	<div><p>Polycirrus medusa Grube, 1850</p> <p>Figs 37a, b; 38a–f</p> <p>Polycirrus medusa Grube, 1850: 330; 1855: 120–121.</p> <p>Type locality. Anse du Rouet, just west of Marseille, France (neotype).</p> <p>Material examined. NEOTYPE: MNHN 1545, France, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=5.1527777&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=43.333054" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 5.1527777/lat 43.333054)">Mediterranean</a> coast, Anse du Rouet, just west of Marseille, France, dead Posidonia beds shallow subtidal, 43°19ʹ59ʺ N, 5°09ʹ10ʺ E, Site E. 3, M.C. 4 (I), 1.8 m, coll. A. Willsie, 9.ix.1982.</p> <p>Description. Fragile, body wall slightly damaged at mid-body level (Fig. 34a).</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 3 to 9. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3 (Fig. 37b). Mature female.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles missing, arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled, small wing-like lobes laterally, margin of medial lobe thin, convoluted; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip smooth, oblong, rounded, half size of outer lip; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, smooth, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 12, extending to segment 14. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 38a, b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of two types (chaetigers 3 and 10 examined): (1) smooth, narrowly winged, worn tips slightly hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; (2) secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers pinnate (Fig. 38e,f). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 15; 53 uncini per row on mid-posterior body neuropodium. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in single transverse series, enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low protuberance (Fig. 38c,d).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 8; situated at ventral base of notopodia. Pygidium smooth ring.</p> <p>Comments. Grube’s (1850) description of the species is very brief (two lines); in a later paper (Grube, 1855) he gives a more comprehensive (for the time) account of the species, but it is inadequate by today’s standards to differentiate the species from several other Polycirrus species. In this latter paper he also refers to the type locality as Villa Franca (near Nice, France). Further, a possible holotype was in the collection of the Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitat, Belin, but has been lost (Holthe, 1986b). Thus, designation of a neotype was deemed necessary. We have designated a neotype of P. medusa as the type of Polycirrus by monotypy from Anse du Rouet, just west of Marseille collected from a similar habitat. The neotype shows some resemblance to the description of material from the North Sea identified as P. medusa by Holthe (1986b), but it is not conspecific as he refers only to plumose (=pinnate) notochaetae unlike the neotype which has both smooth and pinnate types in the same notopodium. The identity of Holthe’s material is uncertain given that he does not specify material examined and that several similar Polycirrus species exist in the region.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFD5FF99FF66A167C54CA4F8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFDBFF96FF66A63FC474A4CE.text	03CD87A2FFDBFF96FF66A63FC474A4CE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus mexicanus (Rioja 1947)	<div><p>Polycirrus mexicanus (Rioja, 1947)</p> <p>Fig. 39a–h</p> <p>Anisocirrus mexicanus Rioja, 1947, 210–212, figs 18–25.</p> <p>Type locality. Western Mexico.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Description. Coded from original description.</p> <p>Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth. Midventral groove from segment 3 (Fig. 39a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles two types: (1) leaf-shaped, deeply furrowed and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled, small wing-like lobes laterally. Outer lower lip flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, with antero-median recess.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 14–18, extending to segments 16–20. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, postchaetal lobe cirriform, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 39b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger of two types, pinnate, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers smooth, narrowly winged, uniformly tapered (Fig. 39c, d). Neurochaetae probably beginning after last notochaetigerous segment (see Comments). Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), single tooth teeth above main fang, subrostral process present as low, rounded protuberance.</p> <p>Comments. While the original description states that the type is held in the collections of the Institute of Biology, attempts to locate it have been unsuccesful. We believe that these collections were transferred at some point to the National Museum in Mexico City, which was damaged during an earthquake.</p> <p>Rioja does not state in the original description where the neuropodia start in relation to the notopodia. Almost certainly they begin after the last notochaetigerous segment as this would account for Rioja’s placement in the genus Anisocirrus, which is defined by its lack of neurochaetae on the ‘thorax’. However, whether they begin one or two segments after the last notochaetigerous segment or well after this (couplet 1, key) is unknown. Therefore, this species was included twice in the key.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFDBFF96FF66A63FC474A4CE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFD9FF95FF66A3CAC528A7AB.text	03CD87A2FFD9FF95FF66A3CAC528A7AB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus multisetigerus Hartmann-Schroder 1962	<div><p>Polycirrus multisetigerus Hartmann-Schröder, 1962</p> <p>Fig. 40a–f</p> <p>Polycirrus multisetigerus Hartmann-Schröder, 1962: 158–160, figs 207–210.</p> <p>Type locality. Isla James, Chile.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: HZM P15172, Chile, Isla <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-67.61667&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-54.933334" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -67.61667/lat -54.933334)">James</a>, Puerto Lagunas, 54°56ʹ S, 67°37ʹ W, intertidal, in the holdfasts of Macroystis pyrifera. coll. 12.viii.1953 by Stuardo.</p> <p>Description. Holotype pinkish brown in colour, 15 mm long, 1.3 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, incomplete with approximately 70 segments. Sex unknown. Type well preserved except that body wall damaged at chaetiger 10 on one side of the body, chaetae mainly intact.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads extending from segment 2 to 11, incised with deep transverse grooves. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3 (Fig. 40a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, some shorter than others, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled, small wing-like lobes laterally, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, smooth; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing towards mouth, tessellated, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 40a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 48, extending to segment 50. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, lobes triangular, postchaetal lobe longer than prechaetal, especially in anterior notopodia (Fig. 40b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of two types (chaetigers 4, 14 examined), smooth, narrowly winged, wings appearing striated under high power, subdistally expanded, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers pinnate (Fig. 40c, d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 8. Neuropodial tori ridge-like, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:∞) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process absent (Fig. 40e, f).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, spherical. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 8.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFD9FF95FF66A3CAC528A7AB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFD9FF92FF66A64CC28DA10D.text	03CD87A2FFD9FF92FF66A64CC28DA10D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus multus Hutchings 1990	<div><p>Polycirrus multus Hutchings, 1990</p> <p>Fig. 41a–d, Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus multus Hutchings, 1990: 383–384, Fig. 2a–d.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: AM W201892, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=114.32995&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=22.462675" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 114.32995/lat 22.462675)">Tidal Pole Point</a>, Hoi Ha, Hong Kong, 22°27'45.63" N 114°19'47.82" E, part of crevice fauna amongst live coral in shallow water.</p> <p>Description. Holotype complete, 12 mm long, 1 mm wide, about 85 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly papillose. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised, tessellated, extending from segment 2 to 10. Mid-ventral groove very deep, from segment 3 (Fig. 41a). Sex unknown.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of three types: (1) leaf-shaped, deeply furrowed, (2) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved, and (3) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, all arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip with prominent medial lobe, small wing-like lateral lobes, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, ridged; outer region flat, shieldlike, oblong, wider than long, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 41a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 30, extending to segment 32. Notopodia digitiform, becoming progressively smaller posteriorly, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, slightly longer than prechaetal (Fig. 41a). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetigers 4, 12 examined), two distinct lengths, weakly pinnate, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 41b). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 14. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, rectangular initially, becoming wedge-shaped then globular more posteriorly (Fig. 41d). Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in single transverse series (MF:8–∞) (see Comments), subrostral process present as low protuberance (Fig. 41c).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, cylindrical, small. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3–4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present extending from segment 5 to 8; situated at ventral base of notopodia. Pygidium simple rosette.</p> <p>Comments. According to the type description, the uncini have a dental formula of MF:5:3:∞, that is three rows above the main fang. However, Fig. 41c shows only one row of teeth above the main fang. Therefore, using the present dental formula concept (i.e., counting teeth as a series in curved rows; see Table 2) the formula should be MF:8–∞, that is, eight to many teeth arranged in a single curved row above the main fang.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFD9FF92FF66A64CC28DA10D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFDEFF92FF66A132C360A41D.text	03CD87A2FFDEFF92FF66A132C360A41D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus nephrosus Hutchings & Glasby 1986	<div><p>Polycirrus nephrosus Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986</p> <p>Fig. 42a–f, Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus nephrosus Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986: 338–339, figs 8a–e, 12E.</p> <p>Type locality. Port Hacking, Sydney, NSW, Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: AM W199641, Australia, New South Wales, Port Hacking, Ship Rock, 34˚04′ S, 151˚06′ E.</p> <p>Description. Holotype 27 mm long, 1.2 mm wide with 37 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated and annulated, dorsal annulations may extend ventrally. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and poorly defined, slightly inflated, ventro-lateral pads, more-or-less smooth. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of two types although few tentacles remaining: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral blindly-ending enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip subtriangular (narrow), smooth; outer region subconical lobe protruding above venter (recurved posteriorly in some specimens), smooth. Achaetous segments not visible (Fig. 42a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 18, extending to segment 20. Notopodia digitiform, rapidly decreasing in size posteriorly, lobes both similar, low and rounded, sometimes upturned, making notopodium appear knob-tipped (Fig. 42b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, pinnate, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 42c, d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 14. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, differ along body, initially papilliform, then increasing in size slightly posteriorly. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), although uncini have a main fang and crest similar to the elongate Type 2, teeth above main fang arranged in single transverse series (MF:3–7), enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process absent (Fig. 42e, f).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, spherical. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3, 4. Postgular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 15; situated at anterior base of notopodia. Pygidium papillated ring.</p> <p>Comments. Hutchings &amp; Glasby (1986) report the following variation in the paratypes: 14–26 notochaetigerous segments, neurochaetae from segment 12–16 (Table 1). The notochaetae are described by them as being hirsute, but the closeup figure in the original description (fig. 8d) clearly indicates that they are pinnate.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFDEFF92FF66A132C360A41D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFC3FF8FFF66A3CAC5CBA610.text	03CD87A2FFC3FF8FFF66A3CAC5CBA610.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus nervosus Marenzeller 1884	<div><p>Polycirrus nervosus Marenzeller, 1884</p> <p>Fig. 43a–h</p> <p>Polycirrus nervosus Marenzeller, 1884: 209–210, pl. 2 fig. 7.</p> <p>Type locality. Japan.</p> <p>Material examined. SYNTYPES: NMW 1794. Japan, Musei Vindobonensis Evertebr. varia coll. Drasch, 1877.</p> <p>Description. Syntypes well preserved with body wall intact and chaetae mainly intact, pale yellow in colour. Syntypes consist of one complete individual 20 mm long, 2 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, with about 90 segments, and one anterior fragment 3 mm long, 1.5 mm wide for about 11 segments. Description based upon complete syntype. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly faintly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised and tessellated, extending from segment 3 to 11. Mid-ventral groove from segment 4 (Fig. 43a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of three types, numerous although mostly detached: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved, (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, and (3) leaf-shaped ones also possibly present, all arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip with prominent medial lobe, small wing-like lateral lobes, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip oblong, ridged; outer region flat, shield-like, inverted T-shaped, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 42, extending approximately to segment 44. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, slightly longer than prechaetal (Fig. 43b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetigers 2, 26 examined), gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 43c–e). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 15. Neuropodial tori ridge-like, differ along body, becoming more erect posteriorly. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in one or two transverse series (MF:3–7 or MF:3–5:3–5) enlarged median tooth above main fang absent, subrostral process present as low protuberance sharp or rounded (Fig. 43f–h).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, small, spherical. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3–4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 10 (at least, anterior body wall damaged); situated at ventral base of notopodia. Pygidium simple rosette.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFC3FF8FFF66A3CAC5CBA610	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFC3FF8FFF66A604C575A5E2.text	03CD87A2FFC3FF8FFF66A604C575A5E2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus nonatoi Carrerette & Nogueira 2013	<div><p>Polycirrus nonatoi Carrerette &amp; Nogueira, 2013</p> <p>Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus nonatoi Carrerette &amp; Nogueira, 2013: 152–158, figs 1–3, tables 2, 3.</p> <p>Type locality. Campos Basin, mouth of Rio Paraíba do Sol, State of Rio de Janeiro Brazil, 23˚12′4.250′′ S, 40˚59′41.700′′ W, in 142 m.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Comments. The species has been thoroughly described by Carrerette &amp; Nogueira (2013), and the description is not repeated here. We have included it in the key to facilitate identification and comparison with other species. It appears to be closest to another Brazilian species, P. breviuncinatus Carrerette &amp; Nogueira, 2013, and also P. arcticus Sars, 1865 and P. broomensis Hartmann-Schröder, 1979.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFC3FF8FFF66A604C575A5E2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFC3FF8DFF66A417C369A0BE.text	03CD87A2FFC3FF8DFF66A417C369A0BE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus norvegicus Wollebaek 1912	<div><p>Polycirrus norvegicus Wollebaek, 1912</p> <p>Fig. 44a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus norvegica Wollebaek, 1912: 83–85, pl. 21, figs 5–7.</p> <p>Polycirrus norvegicus.— Holthe, 1986b: 157, fig. 72a–c.</p> <p>Type locality. Drøbak, Norway.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: ZMO C3205, Norway, Drøbak, 59˚39′36.30′′ N, 10˚37′19.67′′ E, coll. M. Sars.</p> <p>Other material examined. Non-type: 1, ZMO C3206, Norway, Drǿbak, coll. M. Sars.</p> <p>Description. Holotype well preserved, body wall damaged with large parts of anterior body removed, chaetae mainly intact, pale yellow in colour, 15 mm long, 2 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, incomplete with about 50 segments. Sex unknown. Non-type material complete, 15 mm long, 2 mm wide, well preserved but large parts of anterior body wall have been removed.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised with transverse grooves, extending from segment 3 to 10–11 (anterior venter damaged on holotype). Midventral groove from segment 4.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles two types (according to Holthe, 1986b; tentacles now missing on type): (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip comprising single (medial) lobe only, margin of lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, smooth; outer region flat, shieldlike, oblong, longer than wide, tapering slightly toward mouth, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to posterior margin of segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 44a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 16, extending to segment 18 (approximately, body wall damaged). Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, short, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 44b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetigers 4, 14 examined), two distinct lengths, hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 44c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 10–12 (up to 15 according to Holthe (1986b); not discernable on type). Neuropodial tori ridge-like, differ along body becoming more rectangular and erect posteriorly. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in single transverse series (MF:1–4) enlarged median tooth above main fang present or absent, subrostral process present as low, rounded protuberance (Fig. 44d,e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present according to Holthe (1986b), though not visible on type. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3–4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 8.</p> <p>Comments. Holthe’s (1986b) redescription of the species is based upon the type material, including presumably a greater range of material than available for this study. He indicates that the buccal tentacles are numerous and of several thicknesses. He also states that the species is characterised by 14–20 pairs of notopodia and that neuropodia begin from chaetigerous segment 8–13. Nephridial papillae are reported on segments 3–8.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFC3FF8DFF66A417C369A0BE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFC1FF8DFF66A0A8C40AA4CC.text	03CD87A2FFC1FF8DFF66A0A8C40AA4CC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus octosetus (Hutchings 1977)	<div><p>Polycirrus octosetus (Hutchings, 1977)</p> <p>Fig. 45a–g</p> <p>Litancyra octoseta Hutchings, 1977: 10, fig. 4a–d.</p> <p>Polycirrus octoseta Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986: 339, figs 8g –l; 12D.</p> <p>Type locality. Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: AM W6852, Australia, Queensland, Moreton Bay, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=153.11667&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-27.4" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 153.11667/lat -27.4)">Serpentine Creek</a>, 27°24ʹ S, 153°7ʹ E.</p> <p>Description. Holotype complete, 9 mm long, 1 mm wide at anterior end with 48 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated (faintly, as reported in paratype). Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads weakly incised, tessellated, extending from segment 3 to 8. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3 poorly defined.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of one type, varying in length, cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip comprising very long single (medial)lobe only, margin of lobe straight; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip oblong; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, smooth, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 45a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 8, extending to segment 10. Notopodia digitiform, short, lobes both similar, low and rounded. Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of two types, smooth, narrowly winged (striations visible under oil), subdistally expanded, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers smooth, narrowly winged (though striations visible under oil), uniformly tapered (Fig. 45b–d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 17, 32–38 uncini per row. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, similar along body. Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2), teeth above main fang arranged in multiple series of three or four rows (MF:1–3:1–3:2:1) subrostral process absent (Fig. 45e–g).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not visible in holotype, although specimen is gravid.</p> <p>Comments. Hutchings &amp; Glasby (1986) reported that eight or nine notochaetigerous segments were present among all the material examined.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFC1FF8DFF66A0A8C40AA4CC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFC7FF8AFF66A56CC426A2B8.text	03CD87A2FFC7FF8AFF66A56CC426A2B8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus paivai Garraffoni & Costa 2003	<div><p>Polycirrus paivai Garraffoni &amp; Costa, 2003</p> <p>Fig. 46a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus paivai Garraffoni &amp; Costa, 2003: 5–6, figs 5–9.</p> <p>Type locality. Abrolhos Archpelago, Brazil, 17˚58ʹ44ʺ S, 38˚42ʹ41ʺ W.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Description. Based on type description. Hototype complete, 10 mm long, 0.72 mm wide, about 55 segments.</p> <p>Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised with slight transverse grooves, extending from segment 4. Mid-ventral groove from segment 4.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of one type. Upper lip prominent medial lobe, small wing-like lateral lobes, margin of medial lobe straight; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Outer lower lip flat, shield-like, pentagonal, large and cushionlike, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3 (Fig. 46a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 12, extending to segment 14. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 46b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of two types, pinnate (type description does not say if these are primary or secondary), posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; presumed secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers smooth, narrowly winged, uniformly tapered (Fig. 46c, d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 12, 9–12 uncini per row throughout. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:3:2) subrostral process present as low protuberance (Fig. 46e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not visible.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFC7FF8AFF66A56CC426A2B8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFC6FF8AFF66A2AFC4CEA707.text	03CD87A2FFC6FF8AFF66A2AFC4CEA707.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus papillosus Carrerette & Nogueira 2013	<div><p>Polycirrus papillosus Carrerette &amp; Nogueira, 2013</p> <p>Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus papillosus Carrerette &amp; Nogueira, 2013: 158–162, figs 4–6, tables 2, 4.</p> <p>Type locality. Campos Basin, mouth of Rio Paraíba do Sol, State of Rio de Janeiro Brazil. 21˚42′33.078′′ S, 40˚9′5.988′′ W, in 147 m.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Comments. The species has been thoroughly described by Carrerette &amp; Nogueira (2013) and the description is not repeated here. We have included it in the key to facilitate identification and comparison with other species. Carrerette &amp; Nogueira (2013) note the alliance of this species with other Group 1A taxa identified by Glasby and Glasby (2006), i.e., having Type 1 uncini and notopodia terminating before segment 20, and they make a number of comparisons with other Group 1A species. However, they do not compare their species with P. medusa, which we find to be most similar based on characters used in the key. Polycirrus papillosus may be easily distinguished from P. medusa by the form of the ventral pads (papillose in former, smooth in the latter) and the more elongate base of the uncini in P. papillosus compared to P. medusa.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFC6FF8AFF66A2AFC4CEA707	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFC6FF89FF66A704C2E7A3ED.text	03CD87A2FFC6FF89FF66A704C2E7A3ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus parvus Hutchings & Glasby 1986	<div><p>Polycirrus parvus Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986</p> <p>Fig. 47a–e, Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus parvus Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986: 339–341, figs 9a–e; 12E.</p> <p>Type locality. Off Port Hedland, Western Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: AM W199628, Australia, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=116.96&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-20.02" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 116.96/lat -20.02)">North West Shelf</a>, off Port Hedland, 20°1ʹ12ʺ S, 116°57ʹ36ʺ E, sandy sediments in 40–80 m.</p> <p>Description. Holotype incomplete, 5.1 mm long, 0.7 mm wide with 27 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly faintly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth with a few weak transverse grooves, extending from segment 3 to 9. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of two types (few remaining): (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, not extending laterally. Upper lip prominent medial lobe with slight lateral expansions at base, margin of medial lobe straight; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long almost pentagonal in shape, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to posterior margin of segment 3. Achaetous segments visible entirely as distinct rings; segment 1 equal in length to segment 2 dorsally (Fig. 47a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 10, extending to segment 12. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, short; prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 47b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, hirsute, subdistally slightly expanded, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 47c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 14, 15–30 uncini per row. Neuropodial tori erect rectangular pinnules, becoming more erect posteriorly. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:2–5:5–6) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low protuberance (Fig. 47d,e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not visible.</p> <p>Comments. Hutchings &amp; Glasby (1986) report the following variation in the paratypes: 9–13 notochaetigerous segments, neurochaetae from segment 12–18, and dental formula of uncini MF:2–6:3–7 (Table 1).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFC6FF89FF66A704C2E7A3ED	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFCBFF87FF66A3CAC426A723.text	03CD87A2FFCBFF87FF66A3CAC426A723.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus paucidens Hutchings & Glasby 1986	<div><p>Polycirrus paucidens Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986</p> <p>Fig. 48a–g, Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus paucidens Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986: 341, fig. 9f–l; 12D.</p> <p>Type locality. Bass Strait, Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: MV F50348, Australia, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=144.93333&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-40.515835" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 144.93333/lat -40.515835)">south western Bass Strait</a>, 40°30ʹ57ʺ S, 144°56' E, 60 m.</p> <p>Description. Holotype complete, 10.2 mm long, 1.2 mm wide, with about 50 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly heavily papillose. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove from segment 3 and discrete ventro-lateral pads flat and not well defined; pads deeply incised with many small corrugations, extending from segment 3 to 9 (Fig. 48a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both types arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, not extending laterally. Upper lip with prominent medial lobe, small wing-like lateral lobes, margin of medial lobe straight; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip not visible; outer lower lip small, flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, smooth. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 48a, b).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 7–9, extending to segments 9–11. Notopodia digitiform, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe broadly digitiform, postchaetal lobe longer than prechaetal (Fig. 48c). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, smooth, narrowly winged, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 48d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 13–17, 8–22 uncini per row. Neuropodial tori erect rectangular pinnules, similar along body. Uncini with long neck and slightly concave base (Type 2) (based on morphometric study, although appear somewhat intermediate), main fang unusually blunt, teeth above main fang arranged in single transverse series (MF:1–5) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process absent (Fig. 48e–g).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not visible.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFCBFF87FF66A3CAC426A723	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFCBFF87FF66A7D8C6EDA6ED.text	03CD87A2FFCBFF87FF66A7D8C6EDA6ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus pellucida (Quatrefages 1865)	<div><p>Polycirrus pellucida (Quatrefages, 1865), species inquirenda</p> <p>Apneumea pellucida Quatrefages, 1865: 380–382, pl. 14, figs 12–16.</p> <p>Type locality. France.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Comment. No material of this species can be located in the Museum d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris, where one would expect Quatrefages’s material to be lodged. The original description is too brief to allow it to be coded. Attempts to recollect material from the type locality or find additional material collected from there were unsuccesful. We therefore agree that P. pellucida is a species inquirenda as previously suggested by Hartman (1959).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFCBFF87FF66A7D8C6EDA6ED	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFCBFF85FF66A51AC556A196.text	03CD87A2FFCBFF85FF66A51AC556A196.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus perplexus Moore 1923	<div><p>Polycirrus perplexus Moore, 1923</p> <p>Fig. 49a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus perplexus Moore, 1923: 198–199.</p> <p>Type locality. Monterey Bay, California, USA.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: USNM 17366, USA, California, Monterey Bay off Santa Cruz Island, "Albatross" Expedition, coll. 13.v.1904.</p> <p>Description. Holotype well preserved with body wall intact and chaetae mainly intact, greyish in colour, 30 mm long, 3 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, complete with about 75 segments. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised, tessellated, extending from segment 3 to 14. Mid-ventral groove from segment 4.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of two types although few remaining: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral blindly-ending enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, strongly ridged; outer region flat, shield-like, inverted Tshaped, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to posterior margin of segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 49a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 42, extending to segment 44. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular (tapered distally), prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 49b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger of one type (chaetigers 3, 29 examined), two distinct lengths, hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 49c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 10. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, becoming more erect posteriorly, except for last few segments. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:∞) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low, rounded protuberance (Fig. 49d,e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular (pre-gular) or cylindrical (post-gular). Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3–4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 8; situated at ventral base of notopodia. Pygidium simple rosette.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFCBFF85FF66A51AC556A196	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFC9FF85FF66A18AC385A47F.text	03CD87A2FFC9FF85FF66A18AC385A47F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus phosphoreus Verrill 1880	<div><p>Polycirrus phosphoreus Verrill, 1880</p> <p>Fig. 50a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus phosphoreus Verrill, 1880: 181.</p> <p>Type locality. Cape Cod, USA.</p> <p>Material examined. SYNTYPE: USNM 9275, USA, off Cape Cod, US Fisheries Commission, St. 307, 57 m (31 fms), coll. 25.viii.1879.</p> <p>Description. Syntypes poorly preserved with body wall damaged, fragile and slightly dehydrated and chaetae mainly intact, pale golden in colour. Syntypes consist of two individuals, one in three pieces consisting of bunch of buccal tentacles; anterior fragment 10 mm long, 3 mm wide for 18 segments; and mid-posterior fragment 7 mm long, 2 mm wide for about 20 segments; possibly these fragments were originally joined. Other specimen 15 mm long, 2 mm wide for about 70 segments, all buccal tentacles absent, both syntypes incomplete. Sex, one type female, other sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly faintly tessellated, becoming ridged posteriorly. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and poorly defined ventro-lateral pads; pads incised with transverse grooves. Mid-ventral groove from segment 4 (Fig. 50a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip comprising single (medial), rectangular-shaped lobe only, margin of lobe strongly convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, hidden by upper lip, ridged and tessellated; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, tessellated, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 24, extending to approximately segment 26. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, lobes both similar, low and rounded (Fig. 50b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetigers 7, 19 examined), gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, minutely hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 50c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 10. Neuropodial tori ridge-like, differ along body, becoming more glandular and slightly more erect posteriorly. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:13) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low rounded protuberance (Fig. 50d,e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, cylindrical. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3–4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 13; situated at base of notopodia.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFC9FF85FF66A18AC385A47F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFCFFF82FF66A799C6D2A24B.text	03CD87A2FFCFFF82FF66A799C6D2A24B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus plumosus (Wollebaek 1912)	<div><p>Polycirrus plumosus (Wollebaek, 1912)</p> <p>Fig. 51a–d</p> <p>Ereutho plumosa Wollebaek, 1912: 82–83, figs 1–4.</p> <p>Type locality. Norway.</p> <p>Material examined. None.</p> <p>Description. Body long, anterior and mid- body usually thick, about 100 segments (no dimensions provided). Body colouration when preserved whitish.</p> <p>Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and poorly defined ventro-lateral pads (about 9 unpaired narrow ventral pads, followed by 4–5 paired ones); pads papillose, incised. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3 (Fig. 51a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved. Upper lip comprising medial broad lobe only. Outer lower lip subconical lobe protruding above venter, long, prominent (Fig. 51a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 17–19, extending to segments 19–21. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal. Notochaetae within a chaetiger two types: primary type smooth, narrowly winged, subdistally slightly expanded, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 51b); secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers pinnate (Fig. 51c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 18–20. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (formula not deducible), subrostral process present as low, rounded protuberance (Fig. 51d).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3–4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 9.</p> <p>Comments. The above description is scored primarily from Holthe (1986b), which appears to be based on material collected in the Faroes, the eastern North Sea, the west coast of Sweden, and western Norway near the type locality. The one exception is that the ventrolateral pads are illustrated by Wollebaek (1912) as being slightly papillose (Fig. 48a), whereas this detail is missing in Holthe’s illustration. According to Holthe (1986b) the type should be in the Zoological Museum, Oslo; however, our correspondance with this institution indicates that they have failed to locate the types. Wollebaek provides sufficient character information for the species to be accepted as valid.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFCFFF82FF66A799C6D2A24B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFCEFF82FF66A2F0C4C3A6E2.text	03CD87A2FFCEFF82FF66A2F0C4C3A6E2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus porcatus Knox & Cameron 1971	<div><p>Polycirrus porcatus Knox &amp; Cameron, 1971</p> <p>Fig. 52a–e, Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus porcata Knox &amp; Cameron, 1971: 36, figs 30–31.- Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986: 341, figs 10a–d, 12F.</p> <p>Type locality. Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: MV F41757, Australia, Victoria, Quiet Corner, Port Phillip Bay, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=145.02&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-37.97" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 145.02/lat -37.97)">Area</a> 14. St.175, 37º58.2′ S, 145º1.2′ E, coll. 18.xii.1962.</p> <p>Description. Holotype poorly preserved with body wall damaged, chaetae mainly intact, pale cream in colour, 30 mm long and 4 mm maximum width, excluding buccal tentacles, complete with 35 segments. Sex female.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and poorly defined ventrolateral pads; pads incised tessellated anteriorly. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising dorsally on prostomial ridge. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral blindly-ending enclosed diverticulae, lateral lobes with crenulate margins, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip subtriangular, smooth; outer region flat, shieldlike, oblong, longer than wide, rugose, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 52a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 12, extending to segment 14. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe subtriangular, slightly longer than prechaetal (Fig. 52b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetigers 5 and mid-body one examined), gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 52c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 6. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, differ along body, posterior ones with small notopodial cirrus. Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2), anterior-most ones more squat; teeth above main fang arranged in single transverse series (anterior-most ones; MF:3–4) or arranged in double transverse series (posterior ones; MF:3–4:∞) enlarged median tooth above main fang absent, subrostral process tooth-like (Fig. 52d,e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular, initially small, increasing in size posteriorly. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segment 4 only. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 13; situated at antero-ventral base of notopodia. Pygidium papillated ring with about 8 papillae.</p> <p>Comment. It should be noted that some of the original drawings of Knox &amp; Cameron (1971) were mislabelled and these errors have been corrected in this paper.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFCEFF82FF66A2F0C4C3A6E2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFCEFFBFFF66A51AC6BEA1D8.text	03CD87A2FFCEFFBFFF66A51AC6BEA1D8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus pumilis Hartmann-Schroder 1990	<div><p>Polycirrus pumilis Hartmann-Schröder, 1990</p> <p>Fig. 53a–d</p> <p>Polycirrus pumilis Hartmann-Schröder, 1990: 77, figs 40–43.</p> <p>Type locality. South of Yamba, NSW, Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. PARATYPES: 2, AM W203315, Australia, New South Wales, Angourie Point, south of <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=154.36667&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-29.35" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 154.36667/lat -29.35)">Yamba</a>, 29°21' S 154°22' E, 17.i.1976, intertidal.</p> <p>Description. According to original description, holotype incomplete, 5 mm long, 0.68 mm wide for 27 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 2 to 8. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of one type, cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, some shorter than others, arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, not extending laterally. Upper lip comprising single (medial) lobe only, margin of lobe straight; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, narrow, smooth; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, smooth, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 53a, b).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 10–11, extending to segments 12–13. Notopodia digitiform, short, lobes similar, low and rounded. Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, pinnate, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 53c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 7, 20–24 uncini per row, more in posterior body segments. Uncini with medium length neck and concave base (Type 2, as determined by morphometric study, see below), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1–3:6–8) subrostral process present as low protuberance (Fig. 53d).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not visible in paratype.</p> <p>Comments. According to Hartmann-Schröder (1990), nephridial papillae are present on chaetigers 1–3 of the holotype, that is, segments 3–5. Those on segments 3 and 4 would represent pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae as defined here. The ones on segment 5 would be post-gular membrane nephridial papillae.</p> <p>The shape of the anteriormost uncini in P. pumilis is not typical of Type 2 as defined by Glasby &amp; Glasby (2006), which has an elongate rostrum, long neck and arched concave base; however, the results of their morphometric analysis utilising all components of shape variation placed these uncini in the Type 2 category. In addition, analysis of co-varying notochaetal characters by these authors provided further support for the grouping of this species with other species bearing Type 2 uncini. Polycirrus pumilis probably belongs to a group of Type 2 species having dimorphic uncini; these species also have early commencement of neuropodia, i.e., prior to segment 10.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFCEFFBFFF66A51AC6BEA1D8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFF3FFBFFF66A042C213A4E0.text	03CD87A2FFF3FFBFFF66A042C213A4E0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus purpureus Schmarda 1861	<div><p>Polycirrus purpureus Schmarda, 1861</p> <p>Fig. 54a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus purpureus Schmarda, 1861:39, pl 25, fig. 194.</p> <p>Apneumea purpurea.— Quatrefages, 1865: 383.</p> <p>Type locality. Jamaica.</p> <p>Material examined. SYNYTPES: 9, NMW 1795. Jamaica, south coast.</p> <p>Description. Complete specimen well preserved with body wall mainly intact and chaetae mainly intact, pinkish brown in colour, 20 mm long, 1.5 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, with 160 segments. Anterior fragment 5 mm long, 1.5 mm wide for 11 segments; posterior fragment 20 mm long, 1.5 mm wide for about 60 segments. Description based upon complete specimen. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly faintly ridged or faintly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised with longitudinal grooves, extending from segment 3 to 12. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3 (Fig. 54a).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral blindly-ending enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, ridged; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, longer than wide, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. At least one achaetous segment visible entirely as distinct ring.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 82–84, extending to segments 84–86. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, short, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, postchaetal lobe longer than prechaetal (Fig. 54b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetigers 4, 21 examined), two distinct lengths, hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 54c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 14. Neuropodial tori ridge-like, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:3:5–6), single enlarged median tooth above main fang absent, subrostral process absent (Fig. 54d,e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular, inside a depression (Fig. 54a). Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3–4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segments 5 to 12; situated at antero-ventral base of notopodia. Pygidium simple rosette.</p> <p>Comments. Augener (1925) redescribed other syntypes of P. purpureus (Nr 99) housed in the Zoological Museum, Copenhagen, and concluded that this species is a senior synonym of P. luminosus. We have not followed this synonymy for the reasons stated earlier (see comments under P. luminosus).</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFF3FFBFFF66A042C213A4E0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFF1FFBDFF66A3CAC7E2A78B.text	03CD87A2FFF1FFBDFF66A3CAC7E2A78B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus quadratus Hutchings 1990	<div><p>Polycirrus quadratus Hutchings, 1990</p> <p>Fig. 55a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus quadratus Hutchings, 1990, 384–386, figs 3a–e.</p> <p>Type locality. Hong Kong.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: AM W201886. Hong Kong, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=114.25&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=22.25" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 114.25/lat 22.25)">Cox Head Rock</a>, 22°15' N 114°15'E, coll. 19.iv.1986, underneath boulders in 2–5 m.</p> <p>Description. Holotype incomplete, 20 mm long, 1.5 wide with 36 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated (and inflated). Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventrolateral pads; pads incised and tessellated, extending from segment 2 to 13. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled, small wing-like lobes laterally, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, rounded, divided into two equal lobes, ridged; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, longer than wide, smooth, extending posteriorly to posterior margin of segment 4. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 55a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 12, extending to segment 14. Notopodia digitiform with tips slightly swollen, lobes similar, low and rounded. Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of two types, smooth, narrowly winged, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers hirsute, uniformly tapered (Fig. 55c, d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 14. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, wedgeshaped, becoming more elongate posteriorly, similar along body (Fig. 55b). Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2), teeth above main fang arranged in single vertical series or arranged in double transverse series (MF:2:1) subrostral process absent (Fig. 55e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular pre-gular or cylindrical post-gular. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae present on segments 3–4. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 7; situated at base of notopodia.</p> <p>Comments. This species exhibits some unusual features including the hirsute secondary notochaetae and the elaborately shaped lower lips.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFF1FFBDFF66A3CAC7E2A78B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFF1FFBBFF66A7B0C58FA56A.text	03CD87A2FFF1FFBBFF66A7B0C58FA56A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus rosea Hutchings & Murray 1984	<div><p>Polycirrus rosea Hutchings &amp; Murray, 1984</p> <p>Fig. 56a–e</p> <p>Polycirrus rosea Hutchings &amp; Murray, 1984: 91–92, fig. 15, 1–5.</p> <p>Type locality. Hawkesbury River, NSW, Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: AM W196900, Australia, New South Wales, Hungry Beach, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=151.28334&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-33.583332" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 151.28334/lat -33.583332)">Hawkesbury River</a>, 33°35ʹ S, 151°17ʹ E, coll. 13.xii.1979.</p> <p>Description. Holotype complete, 8 mm long, 5 mm wide.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 3 to 12. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of two types, few remaining: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising dorsally on prostomial ridge. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, not extending laterally. Upper lip comprising single (medial), circular-shaped lobe only, margin of lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip circular; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, smooth, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible entirely as distinct rings (Fig. 56a, b).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 10, extending to segment 12. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe very small, digitiform, longer than prechaetal. Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, smooth, narrowly winged, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 56d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 10, 3–10 uncini per row, numbers highest on posterior segments. Neuropodial tori erect, rectangular pinnules, very small initially, becoming prominent on posterior body (Fig. 56c). Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:6:5), enlarged median tooth above main fang absent, subrostral process present as low protuberance (Fig. 56e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not visible.</p> <p>http://australianmuseum.net.au/Uploads/Journals/16834/101_complete.pdf</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFF1FFBBFF66A7B0C58FA56A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFF6FFBAFF66A3CAC593A7A8.text	03CD87A2FFF6FFBAFF66A3CAC593A7A8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus swakopianus Augener 1918	<div><p>Polycirrus swakopianus Augener, 1918</p> <p>Fig. 57a–f</p> <p>Polycirrus swakopianus Augener, 1918: 563–565, pl. VII, fig. 228, text fig. XCIV.</p> <p>Type locality. South West Africa.</p> <p>Material examined. SYNTYPES: 4, HZM V8733, 2, HZM V8802, South-West Africa (Deutsch-Südwestafrika, Swakopmund), Ebbestrand, coll. C. Manger &amp; W. Michaelson, 1911 and Lüderitzbucht, Flachwasser, 0–10 m, coll. W. Michaelson, 1911.</p> <p>Description. Syntypes well preserved with body wall intact and chaetae mainly intact, creamy yellow in colour. V-8733 includes four complete individuals of which largest is 150 mm long, 1.5 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, complete with about 70 segments; smallest 5 mm long and 1.5 mm wide with about 55 segments. V-8802 consists of anterior fragment 4 mm long, 1.2 mm wide for 12 segments (figured) and single complete individual 10 mm long, 1.2 mm wide with about 70 segments. Some individuals gravid.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 3 to 10. Mid-ventral groove from posterior edge of segment 3.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of one type, cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral blindly ending enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe straight; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip oblong, ridged; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 57a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 26, extending to segment 28. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, swollen, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe subtriangular, longer than prechaetal (Fig. 57b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type (chaetigers 4, 19 examined), two distinct lengths, hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 57c). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 7. Neuropodial tori ridgelike, similar along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:7–8) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low, rounded protuberance (Fig. 57d–f).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not visible. Pygidium simple sunken rosette.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFF6FFBAFF66A3CAC593A7A8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFF6FFB8FF66A64CC411A705.text	03CD87A2FFF6FFB8FF66A64CC411A705.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus tentaculatus (Hartmann-Schroder 1960)	<div><p>Polycirrus tentaculatus (Hartmann-Schröder, 1960)</p> <p>Fig. 58a–e</p> <p>Pseudoampharete tentaculata Hartmann-Schröder, 1960: 39–41, figs 84–88.</p> <p>Polycirrus tentaculatus.— Holthe, 1986a: 171.</p> <p>Type locality. North Peru, intertidal in rock pool.</p> <p>Material examined. Holotype ZMH-P15400, Bei Cancas, North Peru, coll. 13.ix.1950.</p> <p>Description. Coded from the original description and examination by PH of holotype at ZMH. Holotype 12 mm long, 1.5 mm wide with 41 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth (Fig. 55a). Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised by transverse grooves, extending from segment 2. Mid-ventral groove from segment 2 (Fig. 58b). Sex female.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles of three types: (1) leaf-shaped, deeply furrowed, (2) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (3) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, all arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral blindly ending enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular and ciliated. Inner lower lip not described; outer lower lip flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, ridged and grooved longitudinally, extending posteriorly to segment 2. Achaetous segments Achaetous segments visible entirely as distinct rings (Fig. 58a, b).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 45, extending to segment 47. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, lobes triangular, postchaetal (Fig. 58c), posterior notopodia cone-shaped. Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of two types: smooth, narrowly winged, wings striated; tips appears to be hooked, perhaps damaged, uniformly tapered; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers pinnate (Fig. 58d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 7. Uncini arranged in slightly curved row with about 43 within a single row. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1:6–8) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process absent (hook-shaped extension on the unicinus base assumed to be posterior anchor rod common to all Polycirrus) (Fig. 58e).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae, present, rounded. Pygidium smooth, no appendages.</p> <p>Comments. The above description is coded from the type descrition. Hartmann-Schröder (1960) interpreted the tentacles on the lateral part of the upper lip as possible branchiae; also she thought that an enlarged tentacle represented a palp—hence the view that the animal belonged to Ampharetidae; she corrected herself in a later publication (Hartmann-Schröder, 1962) transferring the genus to Polycirrinae. We have compared the type material of P. multisetigerous (from Chile) with the type description of Pseudoampharete tentaculatus (from northern Peru) and found the two species to be very similar, differing only in the following features: anterior dorsum is tessellated in P. multisetigerous and smooth in P. tentaculatus, the mid-ventral groove begins from segment 2 in P. multisetigerous (segment 1 in P. tentaculatus), the upper lip is trefoil shaped in both species, but with small lateral wing-like lobes in P. multisetigerous and lateral blindly ending closed diverticulae in P. tentaculatus, the oral surface of the upper lip lacks grooves leading to the mouth in P. multisetigerous but the grooves are present in P. tentaculatus, the outer lower lip is subtriangular and elevated in P. multisetigerous but oblong and longitudinally grooved in P. tentaculatus. There are no significant differences in the more reliable characters, viz. number of notochaetigerous segments, notochaetae and the segment on which the uncini start. However, we propose maintaining the two species as separate entities, but the hypothesis that they are conspecific should be tested when more material becomes available of each species, including mature specimens to allow comparison of the form and arrangment of nephridial papillae.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFF6FFB8FF66A64CC411A705	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFF4FFB6FF66A739C707A451.text	03CD87A2FFF4FFB6FF66A739C707A451.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus tesselatus Hutchings & Glasby 1986	<div><p>Polycirrus tesselatus Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986</p> <p>Fig. 59a–g, Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus tesselatus Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986: 343–345, figs 10f–l; 12E.</p> <p>Type locality. Western Port, Victoria, Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: MV F503337, Australia, Western Port Bay, 38˚26′ S, 145˚08′ E. coll. 20.xi.1973.</p> <p>Description. Holotype incomplete, 8 mm long, 2 mm wide.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated (Fig. 59a). Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised (tessellated), extending from segment 3 to 12 (to segment 15 in paratypes), posterior ones small and poorly defined. Mid-ventral groove from segment 5 but not well defined until about segment 10 (Fig. 59b).</p> <p>Buccal tentacles variable, long, numerous, of one or two types: (1) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip prominent medial lobe, small wing-like lateral lobes, margin of medial lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, narrow, ridged; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, almost semi-circular, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally, both equal in length to segment 2, but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 59a, b).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 10, extending to segment 12. Notopodia more-or-less rectangular, lobes triangular, postchaetal lobe slightly longer than prechaetal (Fig. 59c). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, smooth, narrowly winged although worn ones appear hirsute near tip, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 59d,e). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 15, 22–40 uncini per row. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules directed posteriorly; initially minute, then increasing in size posteriorly, differ along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in multiple series (MF:1:6–12) enlarged median tooth above main fang present, subrostral process present as low protuberance (Fig. 59f, g).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular. Pre-gular membrane nephridial papillae absent. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 to 10; situated at posteroventral base of notopodia.</p> <p>Comments. Hutchings &amp; Glasby (1986) report the following variation in the paratypes: 10–16 notochaetigerous segments, neurochaetae from segment 10–16, and dental formula of uncini MF:1–5:5–17:∞ (Table 1).</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFF4FFB6FF66A739C707A451	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFF9FFB4FF66A64BC451A000.text	03CD87A2FFF9FFB4FF66A64BC451A000.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus twisti Potts 1928	<div><p>Polycirrus twisti Potts, 1928</p> <p>Fig. 60a–c</p> <p>Polycirrus twisti Potts, 1928: 689–700, fig. 212.</p> <p>Type locality. Suez Canal.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: CUMZ AN 1.1930, Suez Canal, St. K. O, coll. Cambridge Expedition to the Suez Canal, 18.x.1924.</p> <p>Description. Holotype poorly preserved with body wall damaged, chaetae present mainly intact, yellowish brown in colour, consists of fragments of probably two individuals. First individual anterior fragment 4.0 mm long, 1.0 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, with eight segments. Second individual with anterior fragment 12 mm long, 1.2 mm wide for about 21 segments but posterior portion damaged and poorly preserved. Median fragment 30 mm long, 1.2 mm wide. Two posterior fragments with following dimensions: 12 mm long, 1.2 mm wide, and 20 mm long, 1.2 mm wide, only anterior 5 mm well preserved. Sex unknown.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly tessellated. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads incised and tessellated.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of two types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, both arising dorsally on prostomial ridge. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip trefoiled with lateral, blindly ending, enclosed diverticulae, margin of medial lobe convoluted, glandular; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong hidden by upper lip, ridged; outer region flat, shield-like, subtriangular and pointing toward mouth, inflated, ridged and grooved, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally.</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 30, extending to segment 32 (approx. according to Potts (1928)). Notopodia moreor-less rectangular, paddle-shaped, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, longer than prechaetal. Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of two types (chaetiger 12 examined), pinnate, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly; secondary notochaetae in all chaetigers smooth, narrowly winged, slender, uniformly tapered (Fig. 60a, b). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 3 (according to description, but this seems unlikely). Posterior neuropodial tori erect pinnules. Uncini with long neck and concave base (Type 2), posterior ones with shorter neck and straight base, teeth above main fang arranged in multiple series (posterior ones), subrostral process absent (posterior ones) (Fig. 60c).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae present, globular, post-gular ones flatter. Post-gular membrane nephridial papillae present, extending from segment 5 over an undeterminable number of anterior chaetigers; situated at base of notopodia. Pygidium simple rosette.</p> <p>Comments. The University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge, has a policy of not sending material in the mail and thus the types had to be examined in the Natural History Museum, London. Facilities for drawing the anterior end were not available; thus, the anterior end of the species unfortunately remains unfigured. We have reproduced Potts’ (1928) figure of the chaetae here.</p></div> 	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFF9FFB4FF66A64BC451A000	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
03CD87A2FFF8FFB2FF66A03AC5F1A128.text	03CD87A2FFF8FFB2FF66A03AC5F1A128.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Polycirrus variabilis Hutchings & Glasby 1986	<div><p>Polycirrus variabilis Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986</p> <p>Fig. 61a–g, Table 1</p> <p>Polycirrus variabilis Hutchings &amp; Glasby, 1986: 345–347, figs 11a–g, 12E.</p> <p>Type locality. Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia.</p> <p>Material examined. HOLOTYPE: AM W199538 Australia, Queensland, <a href="http://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=145.45&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-14.666667" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 145.45/lat -14.666667)">Lizard Island</a>, 14°40ʹ S, 145°27ʹ E, in coral substrate 7–12 m.</p> <p>Description. Holotype complete, 10.6 mm long, 0.8 mm wide with 57 segments.</p> <p>Dorsum anteriorly smooth, or faintly papillose. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and poorly defined ventro-lateral pads; pads deeply incised, prominently tesselated. Mid-ventral groove from segment 3.</p> <p>Buccal tentacles numerous, of two or three types: (1) cylindrical, thickened distally and distinctly grooved and (2) cylindrical, uniformly thin and weakly grooved, some shorter than others, all arising at junction between prostomium and upper lip. Prostomial ridge distinctly curved, not extending laterally. Upper lip comprising single (medial) lobe only, margin of lobe convoluted. Inner lower lip not visible, outer lower lip flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, slightly inflated, smooth, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally (Fig. 62a).</p> <p>Notochaetigerous segments 10–15, extending to segments 12–17. Notopodia digitiform, prechaetal lobe low, postchaetal lobe digitiform, postchaetal lobe slightly longer than prechaetal (Fig. 61b). Notochaetae within a chaetiger consisting of one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, smooth, narrowly winged, appearing faintly striated under oil; damaged ones appear hirsute, uniformly tapered, posteriorly same form as those anteriorly (Fig. 61c, d). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 18, 6–22 uncini per row, more present on posterior body neuropodia. Neuropodial tori erect pinnules, rectangular lamellae initially, elongating and becoming broader posteriorly, differ along body. Uncini with short neck and straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series (MF:1–5:2–6) enlarged median tooth above main fang often present, subrostral process absent (Fig. 61e–g).</p> <p>Nephridial papillae not visible. Pygidium ring with minute ventral papilla.</p> <p>Comments. Hutchings &amp; Glasby (1986) report the following variation in the paratypes: 10–17 notochaetigerous segments, neurochaetae from segment 15–19 (Table 1).</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>In this paper we have revised the genus Polycirrus based on a morphological study of the type material of most of the approximately 74 nominal species; 59 species, including a new species from the Pacific coast of Panama, are accepted as valid. We have provided a standardised illustrated description of most of these valid species. A small minority of nominal species could not be described because the original description is poor and no type material could be found; these 10 species have been designated as species inquirenda (Appendix). Nominal species lacking type material but having a sufficiently detailed original description that could be standardised using the present character set were accepted as valid provided they could be clearly differentiated from other species in the genus. Standardisation will facilitate future descriptions of species of Polycirrus as we are aware that many more remain to be described, including some in Australia and in New Zealand (four new species). However, well-preserved, intact specimens are needed and often they are damaged during collection. This study was based mainly on an examination of type specimens in order to clarify the validity of existing species; we have been unable to fully characterise the morphological limits of each species, apart from synthesing available data on intraspecific variability in the number of notochaetigerous segments and the first appearance of neuropodia. Future taxonomic studies of Polycirrus would be rewarded by a more thorough consideration of morphological variability, as currently we do not have a good understanding of the range of variability that can be accepted for each species. This applies in particular to intraspecific variation of uncini shape within each species and a better understanding of the form and distribution of nephridial papillae in relation to sexual maturity.</p> </div>	http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2FFF8FFB2FF66A03AC5F1A128	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Glasby, Christopher J.;Hutchings, Pat	Glasby, Christopher J., Hutchings, Pat (2014): Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae). Zootaxa 3877 (1): 1-117, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1
