taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
CA3F4E7D813B0B37FF78C468FDE2D7D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813B0B37FF78C468FDE2D7D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813B0B37FF78C468FDE2D7D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813B0B37FF78C468FDE2D7D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813B0B37FF78C468FDE2D7D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81380B32FF78C379FAF6D5B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81380B32FF78C379FAF6D5B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81380B32FF78C379FAF6D5B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81380B32FF78C379FAF6D5B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81380B32FF78C379FAF6D5B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81030B08FF78C42EFE21D11C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81030B08FF78C42EFE21D11C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81030B08FF78C42EFE21D11C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81030B08FF78C42EFE21D11C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81030B08FF78C42EFE21D11C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813C0B37FF78C468FCA8D336.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813C0B37FF78C468FCA8D336.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813C0B37FF78C468FCA8D336.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813C0B37FF78C468FCA8D336.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813C0B37FF78C468FCA8D336.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81390B32FF78C274FB15D1C9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81390B32FF78C274FB15D1C9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81390B32FF78C274FB15D1C9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81390B32FF78C274FB15D1C9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81390B32FF78C274FB15D1C9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813C0B36FF78C3C9FE0AD78E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813C0B36FF78C3C9FE0AD78E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813C0B36FF78C3C9FE0AD78E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813C0B36FF78C3C9FE0AD78E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813C0B36FF78C3C9FE0AD78E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813A0B31FF78C6F0FC8FD366.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813A0B31FF78C6F0FC8FD366.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813A0B31FF78C6F0FC8FD366.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813A0B31FF78C6F0FC8FD366.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813A0B31FF78C6F0FC8FD366.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813A0B31FF78C6F0FC8FD366.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928565/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928565	FIGURE 7. A. Yarica hyalosoma, ROM 65737, 58.0 mm SL, New Caledonia, by R. Winterbottom. B. Rhabdamia gracilis, ROM 65791, 47.5 mm SL, New Caledonia, by R. Winterbottom.	FIGURE 7. A. Yarica hyalosoma, ROM 65737, 58.0 mm SL, New Caledonia, by R. Winterbottom. B. Rhabdamia gracilis, ROM 65791, 47.5 mm SL, New Caledonia, by R. Winterbottom.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813A0B30FF78C30BFAAED7D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813A0B30FF78C30BFAAED7D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813A0B30FF78C30BFAAED7D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813A0B30FF78C30BFAAED7D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813A0B30FF78C30BFAAED7D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81040B0EFF78C3E3FD35D41B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81040B0EFF78C3E3FD35D41B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81040B0EFF78C3E3FD35D41B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81040B0EFF78C3E3FD35D41B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81040B0EFF78C3E3FD35D41B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813E0B3BFF78C3C7FB8ED56E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928567/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928567	FIGURE 8. Fibramia thermalis. A. Live adults taken at Gilimanuk, Bali, Indonesia, about 50 mm by J.E. Randall. B. Preserved in 70% ethanol, USNM 361694, 50.2 mm SL, Vanuatu, Efate I., Emten Lagoon, by T. Fraser.	FIGURE 8. Fibramia thermalis. A. Live adults taken at Gilimanuk, Bali, Indonesia, about 50 mm by J.E. Randall. B. Preserved in 70% ethanol, USNM 361694, 50.2 mm SL, Vanuatu, Efate I., Emten Lagoon, by T. Fraser.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D813E0B3BFF78C3C7FB8ED56E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81030B0FFF78C1FEFDBBD32E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81030B0FFF78C1FEFDBBD32E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81030B0FFF78C1FEFDBBD32E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81030B0FFF78C1FEFDBBD32E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81030B0FFF78C1FEFDBBD32E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81050B0DFF78C145FA86D206.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81050B0DFF78C145FA86D206.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81050B0DFF78C145FA86D206.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81050B0DFF78C145FA86D206.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81050B0DFF78C145FA86D206.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81050B0DFF78C145FA86D206.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928565/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928565	FIGURE 7. A. Yarica hyalosoma, ROM 65737, 58.0 mm SL, New Caledonia, by R. Winterbottom. B. Rhabdamia gracilis, ROM 65791, 47.5 mm SL, New Caledonia, by R. Winterbottom.	FIGURE 7. A. Yarica hyalosoma, ROM 65737, 58.0 mm SL, New Caledonia, by R. Winterbottom. B. Rhabdamia gracilis, ROM 65791, 47.5 mm SL, New Caledonia, by R. Winterbottom.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81050B0EFF78C4DCFCBFD0A1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81050B0EFF78C4DCFCBFD0A1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81050B0EFF78C4DCFCBFD0A1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81050B0EFF78C4DCFCBFD0A1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81050B0EFF78C4DCFCBFD0A1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81060B33FF78C2B8FCC4D7FC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81060B33FF78C2B8FCC4D7FC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81060B33FF78C2B8FCC4D7FC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81060B33FF78C2B8FCC4D7FC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81060B33FF78C2B8FCC4D7FC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81020B08FF78C55EFC6FD7D7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928551/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928551	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree from the partitioned maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Species names of recent Ostorhinchus [we included here Apogonichthyoides melas as a possible Ostorhinchus, following Mabuchi et al. (2006)] were blue, those of Apogon sensu lato [genus Apogon in Fraser (1972)] excepting the Ostorhinchus red, and those of genus Rhabdamia in Fraser (1972) green. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated on the left of the corresponding clades. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML, Bayesian (BA: Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81020B08FF78C55EFC6FD7D7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928553/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928553	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree (50% majority-rule consensus tree) from the partitioned Bayesian (BA) analysis. Numbers besides internal branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs: shown as percentages, only those of> 50% shown). Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve major clades were indicated as in Figure 2. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and most parsimonious (MP: Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81020B08FF78C55EFC6FD7D7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928559/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928559	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	FIGURE 4. Strict consensus tree of two of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-A). Numbers besides internal branches indicate bootstrap probabilities (BPs) from 1000 replicates (only those of> 50% shown). Topological incongruity between the two MP trees denoted by an arrowhead. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. Species names were colored as in Figure 2. The names of the twelve clades were indicated as in Figure 2.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81020B08FF78C55EFC6FD7D7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928561/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928561	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree of the remaining three of the five most parsimonious (MP) trees (MP tree-B). Topological incongruities between the three MP trees denoted by arrowheads. Four species, which phylogenetic positions were largely different among the ML (Fig. 2), BA (Fig. 3), and MP (Figs. 4 and 5) tress, were indicated by arrows with asterisks. This tree was largely different from the MP tree-A (Fig. 4) in the positions of Pterapogon kauderni and Vincentia novaehollandiae.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
CA3F4E7D81020B08FF78C55EFC6FD7D7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4928563/files/figure.png	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4928563	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	FIGURE 6. Strict consensus tree of the ML, BA and MP trees shown in Figures 2-5. Species names were colored as in Figures 2–5. The names of the twelve major clades (clades I to XII) within the Apogoninae were indicated besides the corresponding clades, while the names of the thirteen tribes (defined based on morphological characters) on the right of corresponding major and minor clades. The tribe Lepidamiini is not in the tree. Tribes with solid bars include species of Apogon sensu lato, and those with open bars do not include it. Geographic ranges were indicated on the right of the clades only for the species of clade II (Apogonini), all the other apogonids occurring on Indo-Pacific Basin. For the revised genus names of some species, see Appendix A.	2014-08-01	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi		Zenodo	biologists	Mabuchi, Kohji;Fraser, Thomas H.;Song, Hayeun;Azuma, Yoichiro;Nishida, Mutsumi			
