identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
EF793858687CFF9DFF47B822D2D80475.text	EF793858687CFF9DFF47B822D2D80475.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Luciola lambkinae Keller and Ballantyne 2021	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Luciola lambkinae Keller and Ballantyne , nomen novum </p>
            <p> Luciola roseicollis Pic 1935: 6 . McDermott 1966: 112 partim; Fu et al. 2010: 15 partim (nec  Luciola roseicollis Pic 1933: 109 ). </p>
            <p>  Type. Male. CHINA as  Kina S Kansu. MNHN. Labelled : 1.  Handwritten roseicollis n sp  ; 2. handwritten voisin de calceata; 3. Red card printed TYPE; 4. Printed Sven Hedins Exp. Ctr. Asien Dr Hummel; 5. Printed  Kina S. Kansu.</p>
            <p>Etymology. The species is named for Christine Lambkin (Queensland Museum, South Brisbane, Australia). Dr. Lambkin has been collaborating with LB since 2000 trying to make sense of the Australopacific and Asian lucioline fauna. This is a small honor for 21 years of shared interest and collaboration.</p>
            <p>Diagnosis. Rosy pink pronotum; narrow anterior dark marking may reflect retraction of fat body in this area and the dark color is probably the dark head showing through the transparent cuticle; mesoscutellum dingy yellow; elytra black and subparallel-sided; most of ventral surface (and head) black except for brown femora of hind legs (interpretation of other legs not possible), and white light organ occupying all of the terminal two abdominal ventrites except for a narrow median posterior yellowish portion; lateral margins of light organ in ventrite 7 converge posteriorly, and posterior margin truncate, with very slight broad emargination.</p>
            <p> Remarks. This specimen was not dissected and thus reliable assignment to any genus is not possible. We have assigned it to the genus  Luciola sensu lato , a category Ballantyne et al. (2019) used for  Luciolinae species still not investigated nor assigned to any genus. This category is one of convenience and has no taxonomic standing. Pic (1935) highlighted the very slight emargination of the posterior margin of the ventrite 7 light organ (“ultimo truncato aut paulo emarginato”) and considered the species close to the similarly colored  Luciola cerata Olivier differing in the pinkish pronotal tint with an anterior dark marking.  Luciola cerata was redescribed from a lectotype designation by Fu and Ballantyne (2008) and subsequently assigned to the genus  Abscondita by Ballantyne et al. (2013). It is only known from Taiwan. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EF793858687CFF9DFF47B822D2D80475	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Keller, Oliver;Ballantyne, Lesley	Keller, Oliver, Ballantyne, Lesley (2021): Luciola lambkinae Keller and Ballantyne, new replacement name for Luciola roseicollis Pic, 1935 (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Insecta Mundi 2021 (874): 1-3, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5113782
EF793858687DFF9DFF47BC8CD1EC02DF.text	EF793858687DFF9DFF47BC8CD1EC02DF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Luciola roseicollis Pic 1933	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Luciola roseicollis Pic, 1933</p>
            <p> Luciola roseicollis Pic 1933: 109 . McDermott 1966: 112 partim. Fu et al. 2010: 15 partim. </p>
            <p>Type. Not located.</p>
            <p>Diagnosis. In the absence of any reliably identified specimens this diagnosis is based on Pic’s original description. 7 mm long. With thorax rosy red, mesoscutellum yellow; elytra black; having a distinct costa (“in disco distincte costatis”).</p>
            <p> Remarks. Pic’s (1933) description relied on color patterns but he did highlight the presence of a (?single) elytral costa or ridge which is a feature of the genus  Curtos Motschulsky (see Ballantyne et al. 2019) and indicated the similarity of this species to  Luciola impolita Olivier , which has subsequently been assigned to  Curtos .  Curtos is also known to have distinctive dorsal punctation but Pic described the elytral punctation as “minute et dense punctatis”. We are unable to interpret what Pic intended in his description of the elytral apices as “depressis”. </p>
            <p> Assignment to the genus  Luciola sensu lato is made under the same provisions as outlined above. </p>
            <p> Fu et al. (2010) confused the issue in referring to  Luciola roseicollis Pic, 1933 . While their description of color patterns followed the 1933 format, they incorrectly referenced Pic’s (1933) description of the abdomen as possibly being that of a female. Pic (1935) had described the abdomen as truncated and slightly emarginate which suggested a female. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EF793858687DFF9DFF47BC8CD1EC02DF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Keller, Oliver;Ballantyne, Lesley	Keller, Oliver, Ballantyne, Lesley (2021): Luciola lambkinae Keller and Ballantyne, new replacement name for Luciola roseicollis Pic, 1935 (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Insecta Mundi 2021 (874): 1-3, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5113782
