identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
039D8447FFBA786FFF40FBB0FB69FBC0.text	039D8447FFBA786FFF40FBB0FB69FBC0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cuculicola Clay & Meinertzhagen 1939	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Cuculicola Clay &amp; Meinertzhagen, 1939</p>
            <p> Cuculicola Clay &amp; Meinertzhagen, 1939: 165 . Type species:  Degeeriella latirostris (Burmeister, 1838) . </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D8447FFBA786FFF40FBB0FB69FBC0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gustafsson, Daniel R.;Tian, Chunpo;Zou, Fasheng	Gustafsson, Daniel R., Tian, Chunpo, Zou, Fasheng (2021): New species of ischnoceran chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Chinese birds. Zootaxa 4990 (2): 305-328, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4990.2.6
039D8447FFBA786AFF40FB63FAB7FC36.text	039D8447FFBA786AFF40FB63FAB7FC36.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cuculicola calyptocamptus Gustafsson & Tian & Zou 2021	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Cuculicola calyptocamptus new species</p>
            <p>(Figs 1–6)</p>
            <p> Type host:  Hierococcyx sparverioides (Vigors, 1832) —large hawk-cuckoo (  Cuculidae ). </p>
            <p>  Type locality: “White Pheasant Formation”,  Basa Village ,  Hekou Township , Hekou County, Honghe Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China  . </p>
            <p> Diagnosis.  Cuculicola calyptocamptus is close to  Cuculicola erythrophthalmus Emerson, 1964 and  Cuculicola kui Kettle, 1980 in lacking ventral extensions in the distal endomere and having a small overlap between the endomere and the penile arms. However,  Cuculicola calyptocamptus can be separated from those species by having the median section of the ventral carina diffuse and displaced anteriorly to form a rudimentary clypeo-labral suture (Fig. 3); the dorsal endomeral arms are stouter in  C. calyptocamptus (Fig. 4) than in  C. erythrophthalmus . </p>
            <p> In addition,  Cuculicola calyptocamptus can be separated from  C. erythrophthalmus by the following characters: sternites III–VI of both sexes with only 1–2 sts on each side in  C. calyptocamptus (Figs 1–2), but with 3 sts on each side in  C. erythrophthalmus ; male tergopleurites VI–VII with 2 tergocentral setae on each side in  C. calyptocamptus (Fig. 1), but with 3 tergocentral setae on each side in  C. erythrophthalmus ; parameres with distinct “elbow” in  C. calyptocamptus (Figs 4–5), but gently rounded in  C. erythrophthalmus ; female vulval margin more concave and with setae more evenly distributed along margin in  C. erythrophthalmus than in  C. calyptocamptus (Fig. 6). </p>
            <p> Moreover,  Cuculicola calyptocamptus can be separated from  C. kui by the following characters: marginal carina broader in  C. calyptocamptus (Fig. 3) than in  C. kui ; female sternites IV–V with 3 sts on each side in  C. kui , but with 2 sts on each side in  C. calyptocamptus (Fig. 2); frons more evenly rounded in  C. calyptocamptus (Fig. 3) than in  C. kui ; endomere with somewhat elongated distal end in  C. calyptocamptus (Fig. 5), but with flattened distal end in  C. kui . In the original illustrations of  C. kui , the parameres appear to have a distinct bend at about midway, similar to those of  C. calyptocamptus (Fig. 4), but the parameres are more slender in  C. kui than in  C. calyptocamptus (Fig. 4), and the bend in the parameres is more abrupt, and with a more angular outer margin, in  C. calyptocamptus than in  C. kui . </p>
            <p>Description. Both sexes. Head about equally wide in pre- and postantennal sections, frons rounded (Fig. 3). Marginal carina broad throughout, with distinct canals to apertures of most preantennal setae. Dorsal preantennal suture present, curved. Ventral carina interrupted near midline, and appears to curve anteriorly, but this section diffuse, and exact shape unclear. Head chaetotaxy as in Fig. 3. Thoracic and abdominal segments and chaetotaxy as in Figs 1–2. Measurements as in Table 1.</p>
            <p>Male. Basal apodeme relatively short for genus, tongue-like (Figs 4–5); in distal section with ventral folds that appear to connect to penile sclerites. Endomere without distal extensions, and with proximal extensions rather stout. Penile sclerites barely overlapping with endomere. No setae or sensilla visible on endomere or near base of penis in examined specimens. Parameres with characteristic bend at about midway, overlapping distally; pst1–2 sensilla.</p>
            <p>Female. Subgenital plate short, distal margin rounded and bulging slightly (Fig. 6). Vulval margin with poorly sclerotized plates along most of margin, but interrupted medianly; margin with shallow concavity medianly. Vulval chaetotaxy as in Fig. 6, with 4–6 long, slender vms and 2–3 long, slender vss on each side; 1–2 minute setae proximal to vss, often visible only as apertures; vos variable among specimens, generally with 2–3 medium-sized, slender setae on each side situated between subgenital plate and vss.</p>
            <p>Etymology: The species epithet is formed by “ kalupto ”, Greek for “to cover”, and “ kampto ”, Greek for “I bend”. This refers to the pronounced bending of the parameres, which are normally hidden inside the body.</p>
            <p> Type material.   Ex Hierococcyx sparverioides : Holotype ♂, “White Pheasant Formation”,  Basa Village ,  Hekou Township , Hekou County, Honghe Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China, 6 Jun. 2016, Wu Yuchun &amp; Chu Xingzhi, GD-PHTH-00565 (IZGAS). Paratypes: 12♂, 51♀, same data as holotype, GD-PHTH00566–00627 (IZGAS)  . </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D8447FFBA786AFF40FB63FAB7FC36	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gustafsson, Daniel R.;Tian, Chunpo;Zou, Fasheng	Gustafsson, Daniel R., Tian, Chunpo, Zou, Fasheng (2021): New species of ischnoceran chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Chinese birds. Zootaxa 4990 (2): 305-328, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4990.2.6
039D8447FFBF786AFF40FBB1FE2BF840.text	039D8447FFBF786AFF40FBB1FE2BF840.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Goniocotes Burmeister 1838	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Goniocotes Burmeister, 1838</p>
            <p> Goniocotes Burmeister, 1838: 431 . Type species:  Ricinus gallinae De Geer, 1778 . </p>
            <p> Dictyocotes Kéler, 1939: 153 . Type species: “  Goniocotes haplogonus (Nitzsch) ”. </p>
            <p> Remarks. The morphological separation of  Goniocotes and  Goniodes Nitzsch, 1818 has never been clearly established, and Clay (1951) suggested that these two genera would “seem to grade into each other” if sufficient species were examined. Characters that are often used to separate these genera include sexually dimorphic antennae in  Goniodes , but monomorphic antennae in  Goniocotes ; relatively narrow head with rounded temples in  Goniocotes , but relatively wide head with angular temples in  Goniodes ; simple, solenoid genitalia in  Goniocotes compared to the more complex genitalia in  Goniodes . (see Mjöberg 1910; Kéler 1939; Keirans 1967; Ledger 1980; Mey 1997; Price et al. 2003). </p>
            <p> However, neither these characters, nor the combination of some or all of them, clearly separate  Goniocotes from  Goniodes . For example, the two species described below have wide heads with angular temples as in  Goniodes (Figs 7, 10), but have sexually monomorphic antennae as in  Goniocotes . The male genitalia of  Goniocotes kristinae new species (Fig. 8) are simple and solenoid as in  Goniocotes , whereas those of  Goniocotes rolandi new species (Figs 14–15) are more complex, and intermediate between those of  Goniodes and those of  Goniocotes . Moreover, species such as  Goniocotes mayuri Lakshminarayana &amp; Emerson, 1971 have sexually dimorphic antennae, whereas the antennae of  Goniodes macrocephalus (Taschenberg, 1882) are not appreciably dimorphic. Also,  Goniodes dissimilis Denny, 1842 has male temples and genitalia that are more similar to those of  Goniocotes than to those of most other  Goniodes . </p>
            <p> A thorough study of this large group of species is needed to resolve what characters may separate  Goniodes and  Goniocotes or if they should be merged as one genus. Alternatively, this group may have to be subdivided into several genera, resurrecting some of the many current junior synonyms (see Hopkins &amp; Clay 1952: 146, 150). We here provisionally place these two new species in  Goniocotes due to their small size and the fact that their ocular setae are sexually dimorphic (Mey 1997). However,  Goniocotes rolandi is more closely related to the species Kéler (1939) included in  Dictyocotes , whereas  Goniocotes kristinae would belong to either  Goniocotes sensu stricto or another yet undescribed genus. </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D8447FFBF786AFF40FBB1FE2BF840	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gustafsson, Daniel R.;Tian, Chunpo;Zou, Fasheng	Gustafsson, Daniel R., Tian, Chunpo, Zou, Fasheng (2021): New species of ischnoceran chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Chinese birds. Zootaxa 4990 (2): 305-328, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4990.2.6
039D8447FFBE786BFF40FF3DFCA1FA76.text	039D8447FFBE786BFF40FF3DFCA1FA76.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Goniocotes kristinae Gustafsson & Tian & Zou 2021	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Goniocotes kristinae new species</p>
            <p>(Figs 7–9, 12)</p>
            <p> Type host:  Lophura swinhoii (Gould, 1863) —Swinhoe’s Pheasant (  Phasianidae ). </p>
            <p> Type locality: China (Zoo) . </p>
            <p> Diagnosis.  Goniocotes kristinae new species is most similar to  Goniocotes diplogonus Nitzsch [in Giebel], 1866 (see Kéler 1939: fig. 88), but can be separated by the following characters: male preantennal area proportionately shorter and frons flatter in  G. kristinae (Fig. 7) than in  G. diplogonus ; sutural setae present on male abdominal segment V in  G. kristinae (Fig. 7), but absent in  G. diplogonus ; male pterothorax with numerous small setae medianly on posterior margin in  G. kristinae (Fig. 7), but only one central seta on each side here in  G. diplogonus ; sternal section of female tergopleurite IV with two setae on each side apart from that situated at the posterior corner (Fig. 9), but without such setae on this segment in  G. diplogonus . </p>
            <p>Description. Both sexes. Head shape as in Fig. 7; temples flaring slightly, with distinct postero-lateral corner near aperture of mts1. Marginal carina slender, with irregular inner margin. Head chaetotaxy as in Figs 7, 9; os sexually dimorphic; s1–2 and s6–9 present, as well as one sensillum situated roughly on a line between pts and pns, which may be any of s3–5. Thoracic and abdominal segments and chaetotaxy as in Figs 7, 9. Reticulation covers almost all of dorsal surface of head, tergal, sternal and subgenital plates, pro- and pteronotal, and at least parts of femora. For clarity, we have here illustrated only parts of this reticulation in grey, to indicate the relative size of the cells in the pattern. Measurements as in Table 1.</p>
            <p>Male. Ocular seta macroseta (Fig. 7). Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 7; median section of posterior margin of pteronotum with multiple setae (2–4 longer marginal setae and 1–2 shorter submarginal setae on each side); ss present on tergopleurites II–V; tps present on tergopleurites II–IV. Male genitalia solenoid (Fig. 8).</p>
            <p>Female. Ocular seta microseta (Fig. 9). Thoracic and abdominal segments and chaetotaxy as in Fig. 9; ventral submarginal ps present on abdominal segment IV. Vulval margin as in Fig. 12; 9–12 short, slender vms and 2–4 short, thorn-like vss on each side; 6–8 short, slender vos on each side.</p>
            <p>Etymology: The specific epithet is in honour of the first author’s mother, Kristina Bergman Gustafsson, who has supported his interest in and love for animals of all kinds since childhood —a love she has not always understood. With happiness tinged with fear, she has watched her son travelling ever farther away from the safety of the parental home in search of birds and lice finally to settle in the other end of the world. It is hoped that this dedication will go some way towards ameliorating the many sleepless nights she has spent on the first author’s account, and repay some of deep, enduring love she has given him over the years.</p>
            <p> Type material.   Ex “  Hierophasis swinhoii ” =  Lophura swinhoii : Holotype ♂, China (Zoo), Nov. 1937, R  .  Mei- nertzhagen, ID 10671, NHMUK1010675588 [middle male on slide] (NHMUK). Paratypes. 4♂, 3♀, same data as holotype, NHMUK010675587–88 (NHMUK) . </p>
            <p>Remarks. It is unclear from the slide labels whether the type specimens were collected from a zoo in China, a zoo in Taiwan (where the host species is endemic), or in another zoo, London Zoo for example. The reference to “ China ” is a statement of the presumed natural range of the louse.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D8447FFBE786BFF40FF3DFCA1FA76	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gustafsson, Daniel R.;Tian, Chunpo;Zou, Fasheng	Gustafsson, Daniel R., Tian, Chunpo, Zou, Fasheng (2021): New species of ischnoceran chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Chinese birds. Zootaxa 4990 (2): 305-328, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4990.2.6
039D8447FFBE7862FF40F9A4FD32FBA7.text	039D8447FFBE7862FF40F9A4FD32FBA7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Goniocotes rolandi Gustafsson & Tian & Zou 2021	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Goniocotes rolandi new species</p>
            <p>(Figs 10–11, 13–15)</p>
            <p> Type host:  Crossoptilon harmani Elwes, 1881 —Tibetan eared pheasant (  Phasianidae ). </p>
            <p>  Type locality:  Southeast Tibet, China  . </p>
            <p> Diagnosis.  Goniocotes rolandi new species is most similar to  Goniocotes crossoptiloni Liu, 1990 . These two species can be separated by the following characters: male tergopleurites V–VI with 1 tps on each side and tergopleurite VII without tps in  G. crossoptiloni , but tergopleurite V with 2–4 tps on each side, tergopleurite VI with 1–2 tps on each side, and tergopleurite VII with 1–2 tps on each side in  G. rolandi (Fig. 10); male sternite IV–V with 2 sts on each side in  G. crossoptiloni , but with 3–4 sts on each side in  G. rolandi (Fig. 10); head of  G. rolandi (Figs 10–11) proportionately wider and with flatter frons, especially in female, than head of  G. crossoptiloni ; vulval margins more or less gently rounded in  G. crossoptiloni , but with pronounced median bulge in  G. rolandi (Fig. 13); male genitalia not illustrated in sufficient detail for  G. crossoptiloni , but appear to have shorter parameres and broader mesosome than those of  G. rolandi (Figs 14–15). </p>
            <p>Description. Both sexes. Head shape as in Fig. 10; temples flaring with definite postero-lateral corner at aperture of mts1. Marginal carina of moderate width, widening anteriorly (more obvious in male). Head chaetotaxy as in Figs 10–11; os sexually dimorphic; s1–2 and s5–9 present, as well as one sensillum situated roughly on a line between pts and pns, which may be either of s3–4. Thoracic and abdominal segments as in Figs 10–11. Reticulation covers almost all of tergal and subgenital plates, but is less distinct elsewhere. For clarity, we have here illustrated only parts of this reticulation in grey, to indicate the relative size of the cells in the pattern. Measurements as in Table 1.</p>
            <p>Male. Ocular seta macroseta (Fig. 10). Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 10; median section of pteronotum with one macroseta and one microseta on each side; tergopleurites II–IV with setal rows; tergopleurite V with 2–4 tps on each side; tergopleurite VI with 1–2 tps on each side (one specimen with no tps on one side); tergopleurite VII with one tps on each side. Basal apodeme long and slender (Figs 14–15). Mesosome present, roughly triangular dorsally (Fig. 14), but ventrally with distinct hook-shaped lateral extensions at about mid-length. One small sensillum on each side near the dorsal anterior margin; no other sensilla or setae visible. Postero-lateral corners of basal apodeme with rugose nodi; parameres slender and somewhat elongated.</p>
            <p>Female. Ocular seta microseta (Fig. 11). Thoracic and abdominal segments and chaetotaxy as in Fig. 11. Vulval margin with distinct median bulge and lateral sections deeply concave (Fig. 13). Vulval chaetotaxy: 41–48 long, slender vms (often in double rows at least laterally) and 2–3 large, thorn-like vss on each side; oblique set with 5–8 vos of varying length on each side, typically with distal setae longer than more proximal setae.</p>
            <p>Etymology: The specific epithet is in honour of the first author’s father, Roland Gustafsson, who spent many weekends taking him outdoors to watch birds, to camp, to enjoy nature, and introducing him to his first bird-ringing event outside Jönköping, Sweden, in the early 1990s. This laid the foundations of a solid interest in nature for the first author, who eventually devoted his life to biological research.</p>
            <p> Type material.   Ex  Crossoptilon harmani : Holotype ♂, S.E. Tibet [China], May 1912, R  .  Meinertzhagen, ID 3759, NHMUK010675935 [right-most male on slide, marked with black dot] (NHMUK). Paratypes. 3♂, 6♀, same data as holotype, NHMUK010675934–5 (NHMUK) . </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D8447FFBE7862FF40F9A4FD32FBA7	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gustafsson, Daniel R.;Tian, Chunpo;Zou, Fasheng	Gustafsson, Daniel R., Tian, Chunpo, Zou, Fasheng (2021): New species of ischnoceran chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Chinese birds. Zootaxa 4990 (2): 305-328, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4990.2.6
039D8447FFB77862FF40FB00FC35FA17.text	039D8447FFB77862FF40FB00FC35FA17.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rallicola Johnston & Harrison 1911	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Rallicola Johnston &amp; Harrison, 1911</p>
            <p> Oncophorus Piaget, 1880: 213 [preoccupied by  Oncophorus Rudow, 1870: 475 ]. </p>
            <p> Rallicola Johnston &amp; Harrison, 1911: 324 . Type species: “  O. attenuatus N.” =  Rallicola ortygometrae (Schrank, 1781) . Parricola Harrison, 1915: 90. Type species: “  Rallicola (Parricola) sulcata Piaget ” =  Rallicola sulcatus (Piaget, 1880) .  Furnaricola Carriker, 1944: 83 . Type species:  Furnaricola acutifrons Carriker, 1944 . </p>
            <p> Corvicola Carriker, 1949a: 3 . Type species:  Corvicola insulanus Carriker, 1949a . </p>
            <p> Epipicus Carriker, 1949b: 309 . Type species:  Epipicus scapanoides Carriker, 1949b . </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D8447FFB77862FF40FB00FC35FA17	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gustafsson, Daniel R.;Tian, Chunpo;Zou, Fasheng	Gustafsson, Daniel R., Tian, Chunpo, Zou, Fasheng (2021): New species of ischnoceran chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Chinese birds. Zootaxa 4990 (2): 305-328, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4990.2.6
039D8447FFB7787EFF40FA58FEEFFC8E.text	039D8447FFB7787EFF40FA58FEEFFC8E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rallicola (Rallicola) tibetana Gustafsson & Tian & Zou 2021	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Rallicola (Rallicola) tibetana new species</p>
            <p>(Figs 16–23)</p>
            <p> Type host:  Zapornia bicolor Walden, 1872 —black-tailed crake (  Rallidae ). </p>
            <p> Type locality: Pachakshiri, S.E. Tibet, China . </p>
            <p> Diagnosis. In the key of Emerson (1955),  Rallicola (Rallicola) tibetana new species keys out to  Rallicola (R.) ferrisi Emerson, 1955 , but the male genitalia of  R. (R.) tibetana are most similar to those of  Rallicola (R.) funebris (Nitzsch [in Giebel], 1866).  Rallicola (R.) tibetana can be separated from both these species by the following characters: female tergopleurites III–VIII transversally continuous in  R. (R.) tibetana (Fig. 17), but medianly interrupted in the other two species; male subgenital plate of  R. (R.) tibetana extended distally into a stylus (Fig. 16), but no stylus in either of the other two species. </p>
            <p> Furthermore,  Rallicola (R.) tibetana can be separated from  R. (R.) ferrisi by the following characters: hyaline margin extending more posteriorly along the lateral margin of head in  R. (R.) tibetana (Fig. 18) than in  R. (R.) ferrisi ; mesosome of  R. (R.) tibetana narrowing distally as in Figs 20, 22, whereas in  R. (R.) ferrisi the mesosome widens distally, with a deeply incised distal margin and no marginal thickenings [this character is illustrated erroneously by Emerson (1955)]; parameres of  R. (R.) tibetana stout and curved medianly (Fig. 21), but slender and curved laterally in distal third in  R. (R.) ferrisi ; vulval margin strongly arched and female subgenital plate with deep sublateral incisions on distal margin in  R. (R.) ferrisi , but vulval margin more flattened and subgenital plate without such incisions in  R. (R.) tibetana (Fig. 23). Emerson (1955) stated that the female of  R. (R.) ferrisi has only two stout setae on each post-vulval tubercle, but all specimens of this species we have examined, including two paratypes, have three setae on the tubercles on each side. However, we have not examined the allotype female of  R. (R.) ferrisi . By contrast, all specimens of  R. (R.) tibetana have two stout setae on the tubercles (Fig. 23). </p>
            <p> In addition,  Rallicola (R.) tibetana can be separated from  R. (R.) funebris (see Pessoa &amp; Guimarães 1935; Emerson 1955 for illustrations) by the following characters: distal mesosome gently rounded in  R. (R.) tibetana (Fig. 22), but with median extension in  R. (R.) funebris ; parameres with pointed distal ends and curved overall shape in  R. (R.) tibetana (Fig. 21), but with bluntly flattened distal ends and subparallel overall shape in  R. (R.) funebris ; male tergopleurites III–VIII transversally continuous in  R. (R.) tibetana (Figs 16–17), but interrupted medianly in  R. (R.) funebris ; shape of frons and hyaline margin also appears to differ between these two species, based on the illustration of Pessoa &amp; Guimarães (1935). However, photos of  R. (R.) funebris available at the NHMUK homepage (https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset) suggest that the hyaline margin of  R. (R.) funebris is more similar to that of  R. (R.) tibetana , and may have been shrunken or overlooked in the specimens examined by Pessoa &amp; Guimarães (1935). </p>
            <p>Description. Both sexes. Head trapezoidal, with preantennal section much narrower than postantennal section (Fig. 18); frons with elongated hyaline margin that extends along the lateral head margins to near aperture of as1. Dorsal anterior plate longer than wide, with rounded posterior margin. Head chaetotaxy as in Fig. 18; s 1–6 present; s1 and os mesosetae. Antennae sexually dimorphic. Thoracic and abdominal segments and chaetotaxy as in Figs 16–17; tergopleurite II divided medianly and tergopleurites III–VIII transversally continuous in both sexes. Measurements as in Table 1.</p>
            <p>1 N = 12 for PTW and AW, N =10 for TL.</p>
            <p>2 N = 46 for AW, N = 43 for TL, N = 38 for PTW.</p>
            <p>3 N = 3 for TL and AW.</p>
            <p>4 N = 3 for TL and AW.</p>
            <p>5 N = 5 for AW and PTW.</p>
            <p> Male. Antennae as in Fig. 18, with scape and pedicel swollen compared to female, and flagellomere I with distinct distal expansion into hook; antennae illustrated as seen in holotype. Tergopleurite III without anterior incision (Fig. 16). Subgenital plate extended distally along midline to form short stylus similar to those found in some  Oxylipeurus -complex genera (see Gustafsson et al. 2020); one short seta on each side of stylus near distal end. Basal apodeme rounded, trapezoidal, narrowing distally (Fig. 20); articulation between basal apodeme and parameral head as in Fig. 21. Mesosome as in Figs 20, 22; proximal mesosome bilobed, distal end gently rounded and narrowed. Gonopore dorsal, with U-shaped thickening along distal margin; distinct subparallel dorsal thickenings proximal to gonopore. Paramere overall arched, with distal ends convergent and pointed; no subsidiary median extension of paramere; pst1–2 as in Fig. 21. </p>
            <p>Female. Antennae as in Fig. 19. Tergopleurite III with deep, narrow incision of anterior margin at midline (Fig. 17). Subgenital plate as in Fig. 23, without sublateral incisions of distal margin. Vulval margin flattened, with 8–12 short, slender vms and 9–11 short, stout vss on each side; 6–8 short, slender vos on each side of subgenital plate. Vulval margin with sclerotized plate throughout.</p>
            <p>Etymology: The species epithet is derived from the type locality.</p>
            <p> Type material.   Ex Zapornia bicolor : Holotype ♂, Pachakshiri, S.E. Tibet [China], 6 May 1938, no collector, Brit. Mus. 1946-287, NHMUK010690305 (NHMUK). Paratypes. 4♀, same data as holotype, NHMUK010690304– 6 (NHMUK)  . </p>
            <p> Remarks. Slide NHMUK010690306 also contains a male louse that appears to be close to  Rallicola (R.) clayae Tandan, 1951 . </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D8447FFB7787EFF40FA58FEEFFC8E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gustafsson, Daniel R.;Tian, Chunpo;Zou, Fasheng	Gustafsson, Daniel R., Tian, Chunpo, Zou, Fasheng (2021): New species of ischnoceran chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Chinese birds. Zootaxa 4990 (2): 305-328, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4990.2.6
039D8447FFAB787EFF40FC79FBC6FBF9.text	039D8447FFAB787EFF40FC79FBC6FBF9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Resartor Gustafsson & Bush 2017	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Resartor Gustafsson &amp; Bush, 2017</p>
            <p> Resartor Gustafsson &amp; Bush, 2017: 104 . Type species:  Brueelia impressifrons Ansari, 1956 . </p>
            <p>Leiothrichinirmus Mey, 2017: 166. Type species: Leiothrichinirmus weigoldi Mey, 2017.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D8447FFAB787EFF40FC79FBC6FBF9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gustafsson, Daniel R.;Tian, Chunpo;Zou, Fasheng	Gustafsson, Daniel R., Tian, Chunpo, Zou, Fasheng (2021): New species of ischnoceran chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Chinese birds. Zootaxa 4990 (2): 305-328, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4990.2.6
039D8447FFAB787DFF40FB0AFE51FD1E.text	039D8447FFAB787DFF40FB0AFE51FD1E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Resartor elugeus Gustafsson & Tian & Zou 2021	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Resartor elugeus new species</p>
            <p>(Figs 24–32)</p>
            <p> Type host:  Alcippe fratercula yunnanensis Harington, 1913 — Yunnan fulvetta. </p>
            <p>  Type locality:  Ailaoshan , Jingdong County, Yunnan Province, China  . </p>
            <p> Diagnosis.  Resartor elugeus new species keys to couplet 13 in the key of Gustafsson et al. (2018), close to  Resartor longisuturalis Gustafsson et al., 2018 and  Resartor aterrimus Gustafsson et al., 2018 . However,  Resartor elugeus can be separated from these two species by the following characters: male tergopleurite VII without tps in  R. elugeus (Fig. 24) but with tps in the other two species; male tergopleurite IV with psps in  R. elugeus (Fig. 24) but without psps in the other two species; all three species differ in the shape of the proximal mesosome and the mesosomal lobes (Figs 29, 31). </p>
            <p> Resartor elugeus can be further separated from  R. longisuturalis by the following characters: female tergopleurite IV with psps in  R. elugeus (Fig. 25), but without psps in  R. longisuturalis ; mesosomal lobes with one rugose nodus on each side in  R. elugeus (Fig. 31) but with two distinct nodi on each side in  R. longisuturalis . </p>
            <p>Description. Both sexes. Head trapezoidal, frons broadly flattened, lateral margins of preantennal head slightly convex (Fig. 26). Dorsal preantennal suture reaches ads and dsms but not lateral margins of head. Marginal carina narrows anteriorly, with irregular median margin; preantennal nodi bulging. Thickening of dorsal anterior plate typical for genus. Head chaetotaxy as in Fig. 26. Marginal temporal carina with irregular median margin, but rather uniform in width except at mts3 and near occiput. Thoracic and abdominal segments and chaetotaxy as in Figs 24–25. Measurements as in Table 1.</p>
            <p>Male. Antennae distorted and placed underneath the head on both sides in single examined male, and not illustrated; from what can be seen, male antennae are similar to female antennae (Figs 27–28). Tergopleurite IV with psps (Fig. 24); tergopleurite VII without tps. Basal apodeme widening distally, proximal section not visible (Fig. 29). Proximal mesosome expanded into transversal rectangle (Fig. 31). Mesosomal lobes with sharply pointed anterior end, lateral margins convergent distally, with single rugose nodi visible at postero-lateral corner and two pmes microsetae on lateral margin on each side. Ventral section with broad antero-lateral extensions and rounded posterior margin. Parameres with slender heads (Fig. 30), widening distally; pst1–2 as in Fig. 30.</p>
            <p>Female. Antennae as in Figs 27–28. Tergopleurite IV with psps (Fig. 25). Subgenital plate roughly rectangular, with lateral margins barely or not concave (Fig. 32); connection to cross-piece of moderate width. Vulval margin gently rounded with 3–4 short, slender vms and 6–9 short, thorn-like vss on each side; 3–4 long, slender vos on each side of subgenital plate; distal vos near vss.</p>
            <p>Etymology: The species epithet is derived from “ elugeo ”, Latin for “I mourn”. This is in reference to the name of the type locality, Ailaoshan, which means “Mourning Prisoner Mountain”, as well as the dark lateral margins of the abdomen of this species.</p>
            <p> Type material.   Ex  Alcippe fratercula yunnanensis : Holotype ♂,  Ailaoshan Nature Reserve , Jingdong County, Yunnan Province, China, 23 Aug. 2018, D. R  .  Gustafsson &amp; L. Lei, bird J3689, GD-PHTH-00364 (IZGAS). Paratypes: 1♀, same data as holotype, GD-PHTH-00365 (IZGAS). 1♀, same data as holotype, except 4 Sep. 2018, bird J3751, GD-PHTH-00366 (IZGAS). 4♀, same data as holotype except 6 Sep. 2018, bird J3763, GD-PHTH- 00367–370 (IZGAS) . </p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D8447FFAB787DFF40FB0AFE51FD1E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gustafsson, Daniel R.;Tian, Chunpo;Zou, Fasheng	Gustafsson, Daniel R., Tian, Chunpo, Zou, Fasheng (2021): New species of ischnoceran chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Chinese birds. Zootaxa 4990 (2): 305-328, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4990.2.6
